Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The above hadith is Da‟eef (weak) as it contains two Shia narrators i.e. Ahmed Bin Mufzal and Suddi. It
is a rule amongst the muhadditheen that any riwayat (report) from Shia narrators that is against a
Sahabi (RA) is not acceptable. Please see detail on this riwayat on Page 85-87 of Haqiqat-e-Khilafat-o-
Malookiyat by Mehmood Ahmed Abbasi
Note: this book, Haqiqat-e-Khilafat-o-Malookiyat is available for a free download in the e-books section
of the blog. Following is the link: http://therealislam1.wordpress.com/e-books/.
One of the narrators of this hadith, Usman al Shaham is not acceptable personality as confirmed by
Zahbi in his Meezan ul Aitidaal. See below:
i.e. He is not strong (saqqa) and there is no harm in it (which is said for a 4th rated narrator whose
hadith alone is not hujjat). Imam Muslim has only brought one hadith from this narrator in his Sahih and
that too as a corroborating report (Sahadat) for another narrator.
Narrator for Muslim and Bukhari. But there is considerable jirah (criticism) on him (Meezan vol 3, page
93).