The Early Childhood Council submitted views on an Education Amendment Bill concerning a proposal to exempt limited attendance centers like recreation facilities and shopping malls from early childhood education licensing standards. While supporting distinguishing short-term childcare, the Council raised concerns about how quality would be ensured and responsibilities managed for children's safety. They advocated defining limited attendance centers as not providing education unlike early childhood education centers in order to clarify expectations and accountability for each type of service.
The Early Childhood Council submitted views on an Education Amendment Bill concerning a proposal to exempt limited attendance centers like recreation facilities and shopping malls from early childhood education licensing standards. While supporting distinguishing short-term childcare, the Council raised concerns about how quality would be ensured and responsibilities managed for children's safety. They advocated defining limited attendance centers as not providing education unlike early childhood education centers in order to clarify expectations and accountability for each type of service.
The Early Childhood Council submitted views on an Education Amendment Bill concerning a proposal to exempt limited attendance centers like recreation facilities and shopping malls from early childhood education licensing standards. While supporting distinguishing short-term childcare, the Council raised concerns about how quality would be ensured and responsibilities managed for children's safety. They advocated defining limited attendance centers as not providing education unlike early childhood education centers in order to clarify expectations and accountability for each type of service.
The Chair Education Select Committee Parliament Buildings Wellington.
Dear Sir,
Education Amendment Bill (No 2) – Submission
The Early Childhood Council is pleased to submit our views on this draft amendment bill. Our response concerns one policy focus of the draft bill, being the proposal to “exempt limited attendance centres from early childhood education licensing standards to make it easier for recreation facilities, shopping centres and similar organisations to provide short-term childcare”. In summary, while we support the intent to distinguish between early childhood education (ECE) services and those shorter-term crèche-type services provided by recreation facilities, shopping centres and similar organisations, we are concerned about the following factors: 1. The robustness of the criteria proposed to distinguish between ECE services and crèche services, and the risk that the distinction proposes, may allow some services to avoid the responsibilities established under the ECE licensing regime. How will this be managed? We advocate that the provision of quality education services by licensed ECE providers is a further distinction. We are also concerned that the removal of these services from coverage under the Education Act risks cutting the services adrift in terms of any quality of service provision expectation, or in terms of responsibilities toward the appropriate care and safety of the children who use them. Where will these responsibilities be captured to ensure such services can be held to account should an incident occur, and in order to provide parents some assurance? 2. The statement used to mean or define an ECE centre appropriately uses the term “…for the education and care of 3 or more children…”. While this phrase may be appropriately used to describe ECE services, ie: involved in the delivery of quality education and care services for pre-school children, the implication is that crèche services are also delivering education and care services with the only distinction being the duration of exceeding two hours per day or not.
P O Box 31672 Lower Hutt 5040
T: 0800 742 742 – ceo@ecc.org.nz – www.ecc.org.nz It is clear that crèche services are not qualified or resourced to deliver education services at any level. There is no expectation for crèche services to employ qualified ECE teachers or to be held accountable to deliver against the ECE curriculum. We advocate, therefore, for the inclusion of a definition that covers crèche or limited attendance centres as referred to in the policy focus statement above. This definition should include recognition that crèche services do not provide education as part of their service package and therefore are not subject to the same requirements as ECE services. If you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact me.
Special Educational Needs in Practice (Revised Edition): A step-by-step guide to developing a SEN inclusion policy and delivering the requirements of Early Years Action Plus