Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Research methodology according to Emory (1980), is a scientific inquiry whose
procedures include observation of the available fact relating to a particular
problem followed by the formulation of theoretical situation, which is used as a
basis for experiment to obtain evidence for a conclusion or generalization.
This chapter shall therefore emphasize on the methods employed in carrying out
this study. It will start with a preview of case study method as a method of
research. It will discuss the population of study, sample size, sampling technique
and procedures. It will also deal with the instruments that will be used to collect
the needed data and the methods or procedures of processing and analyzing the
collected data. Also included in this chapter is the formulation of hypothesis on
which this study is based.
The representative-ness and typical-ness of cases and life documents have been
of great concern to social researchers. This is because life and personal traits and
complex and varied.
According to Young two questions arise here
• Do the authors of these studies enable us say that these cases are
representative of their land to those described cases similar enough.
Are we able to say that these data provide bases for generalization?
The primary data are those obtained from the completed questionnaire, that is,
from an original source. Secondary data are taken from journals, textbooks and
other publications.
3.7.1 QUESTIONNAIRE
The questionnaire is grouped into two the bio-data and the likert style. The
responses to the Likert-type statements are on five point scale, which range from
“Strongly Agree’’ to “Strongly Disagree’. The points awarded to each are as
follows:
Strongly Agree - 5
Agree - 4
Undecided - 3
Disagree - 2
Strongly Disagree - 1
Each item on the questionnaire is developed to measure the specific aspect of the
hypothesis. Questions are mainly closed so that qualification and analysis of the
results can be carried out effectively and efficiently.
3.8 LIMITATIONS
Bain (1929) vigorously attached the value of the value of the case study method as
a significant scientific material because according to him, they do not provide
impersonal, universal, non-ethical, non-practical, repetitive aspects of
phenomena. Instead, he argued that subjects might provide whatever data they
think the investigator wants.
The greater the report the more subjective the whole method is. The subject is
more likely to be self-justified than factual. Case situations are seldom
comparable in a practical universe of discourse, since the subject tells this story
in his own words, the logical concepts, units of scientific classificatory have to be
read into it by the investigator.
In spite of this attack on the case study method of research, the fact still remains
that it is a method of research that could provide a comprehensive study of
manpower training and development in the public sector of the Nigerian
economy. The researcher is very much aware of these limitations and has
therefore decided to use questionnaires, mainly composed of closed ended
questions.
3.9 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
The completed questionnaire will be collected, serialized, coded and analyzed
sequentially according to the research questions. Tables will be used to provide
information to facilitate analysis. Simple percentages will be used to analyze the
data.
Chi square was employed to test the hypothesis involved in this work and to
estimate the extent of discrepancy that exist between the observed and the
expected outcomes in respect of certain variables.
3.10 HYPOTHESIS
Hypotheses are tentative statements aimed at explaining the relationship
between more variables which still has to be subjected to testing. The following
hypothesis were developed and tested for.
HYPOTHESIS ONE
H0: There is no significant and positive relationship between training and
employee performance.
H1: There is a direct and positive relationship between training and employee
performance.
The aim of this hypothesis is to bring out the relationship between training and
employee performance. Through training, skills and knowledge required for job
performance is acquired and the employee become more competent on the job
and his performance and thus productivity improves. The result of this study will
reveal the validity or the otherwise of these claims.
HYPOTHESIS TWO
H0: There is no relationship between training and enhanced job satisfaction and
motivation
H1: There is a direct relationship between training and enhanced job satisfaction
and motivation.
HYPOTHESIS THREE
H0: There is no relationship between training and reduced employee turnover
H1: There is a direct relationship between training and reduced employee
turnover
This hypothesis tries to determine the relationship between training and reduced
employee turnover. To determine the effects of training on performance, its effect
on employee turnover needs to be known this is because high employee turnover
eventually leads to low performance of organizations. It is claimed that if
employees are trained then they would be less likely to leave their employers.
This hypothesis will put that to the test.
HYPOTHESIS FOUR
H0: There is no relationship between training and employee efficiency
H1: There is a direct relationship between training and employee efficiency
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.8 LIMITATIONS
3.10 HYPOTHESES