Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evolution Theory is
False
Positional Paper
Paul Cho
4/1/10
As I start: Evolution has been one of the main controversial issues in Science. According to
the 2001 landmark education law (No Child Left Behind), I have my right to present my
viewpoints about this theory and contradict the flaws and mistakes in it. Throughout the
paper, my position would be against Darwin’s Evolution Theory. I will fairly compare
every data of each point of view and judge it with my viewpoint.
Paul Cho
Science 6th
4/1/2010
Positional Paper: Evolution
First of all, evolution is change in inherited characteristics in species over time.
Evolution has been one of the controversial issues in Science over many years. Still, both the
evolutionists and non-evolutionists can’t prove their point with specific scientific evidence.
Charles Darwin, an English naturalist, presented his first evolution theory in a book called
On the Origin of Species, which was published in 1859. His theory was going straight against
the religious belief at that time and became controversial in society until now. There are
mainly two positions on this theory. One of the positions is going for this theory, stating that
they believe that Darwinism and his theory are correct. The other position is going against
this theory, often supported by religious reasons and purpose. I believe that evolution is false
Darwinism basically states that all living organisms evolved through the idea of
natural selection. “Natural selection means that organisms with traits best suited to their
environment are more likely to survive and reproduce.” Darwin believed that natural
selection would make organisms adapt better to their environment through many generations.
There are five principles of Natural Selection according to Darwin which generally states that
organisms evolve their genes into better format to adapt into their environment, and those
variations will be passed onto the next offspring. Through these changed variations, inherited
trait that makes different from other species, the organism can improve their adaptation.
Evolution theory also states that when an unnecessary parts or gene is found in an organism,
it should reject or eliminate it over time. But in this theory, there are many flaws and mistakes
wings that makes them fly over the sky. Unfortunately, ostrich can’t fly even though they
have wings. The main reason why they can’t fly is because their wings are too small for their
body size. Then this leads to a two solution under evolution theory, specifically under the
category of natural selection. One of the solutions that should have happened under evolution
theory is that ostrich should have eliminated the wings that are useless. Over hundreds of
years, ostrich’s wings were useless, but they kept produced their offspring with the wings on.
This means that natural selection didn’t happen under the principle of natural selection. The
other solution that should have happened under evolution theory is that they should have
developed their wings. Under the second principle of the natural selection, specie must
develop its variation when needed. We clearly see that ostrich’s diminutive wings are
insufficient for it to fly. Since the wings didn’t develop over time throughout the generations,
this gives us to two solutions in this proof. One of the solutions is that evolution is false, and
Secondly, the main flaw of the evolution theory is the origin of the simplest organism
in the world. Simplest organism, such as one-celled organism often known as viruses, or
amoeba, supports the flaw of this theory. Through evolution theory, it can’t be proved where
this simplest organism came from. This leads to a fall of another theory that is related to
Darwinism. Big bang is frequently related to the theory of evolution where it states that big
bang occurred from matter and energy. If it is proven that anything can’t evolve from nothing,
that means that matter and energy couldn’t just be there to form a world and start evolution.
This result makes me think that this theory is insufficient to create a universe.
among different species. Evolutionists say that humans evolved from apes or monkeys in the
past, but there is a flaw in this theory. Monkeys and other apes, such as orangutan or
chimpanzee, have twenty-four pairs of chromosomes, while humans have twenty-three pairs
lose or add a new chromosome onto the original gene. Even if a new set of chromosome are
made successfully by the means of meiosis, it wouldn’t be able to pass its wrong number of
chromosome onto the next offspring. So even if an ape had successfully evolved into a
human, it will go back to its original gene. Since no human had gone back to the gene form of
Concluding all of the points expressed above, I firmly believe that evolution is false.
It is scientifically proven that evolution is wrong according to those facts listed above. My
opinion about the beginning of the world is most likely to be anti-evolution. I think it would
be impossible to know the beginning of the world since nobody recorded or had witnessed
the scene of creation. I firmly believe on anti-evolution because through science, it has been
proven that it is false. It is possible that theories other than evolution may be right, but I am
sure that evolution is not one of those true theories. In my opinion, there should be a matter in
order to cause another change to occur. Since there was no matter in the beginning of the
world, the only theory, creationism, is what I support other than revolution. Conclusion to all
these questions, nobody knows the answer except the creator of this world.