Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Laws of Magick
By Simon Magus
Magick, not unlike physics or chemistry, operates according to certain laws.
These laws, as well as those of the sciences, reside in reality within the
heads of those who use them. However, the analysis of reality into artificial
categories is useful at certain levels of investigation. It is well to bear in
mind, nevertheless, that such categories reflect more the contents of the
human mind than they do of whatever "reality" might be out there.
For the following analysis we are indebted to REAL MAGIC by P.E.I.
Bonewits. Mr Bonewits, incidentally, holds the first Bachelor of Arts degree in
magic(k) ever awarded. He, much to the chagrin of some of the faculty of
the University of California, was awarded the degree in June, 1970.
LAW OF CAUSE AND EFFECT
Anything done under EXACTLY the same conditions will always be associated
with exactly the same result. This law is taken for granted in the sciences
and in everyday life. The whole concept of causation is now on shaky
ground, thanks to developments in the field of quantum physics. But for
practical purposes, in magick as well as in our everyday lives, we ignore
causality to our own peril. We must assume, at least in dealing with things
the size of human beings, that effects follow causes. Even in the constantly
flowing, changing astral realm we find the law of cause and effect in full
operation.
LAW OF KNOWLEDGE
This law tells us that "understanding brings control," that the more you know
the more powerful you are. If you know all about something, you have total
control over it. "Knowledge is power."
LAW OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE
This is a sub-law of the previous law and follows from it. If you know
yourself, you control yourself. The more you know about yourself, the better
you can control yourself.
LAW OF NAMES
This law is related to the Law of Knowledge and to the Law of Association. It
states if one knows the whole and complete name of a phenomenon or
entity, one has complete control over it. This is one of the reasons the
Mystery Religions (including Christianity) conferred a new name on the
neophyte. His new name was then his true name, but it was known only to
his fellow members of the mystery. The Law of Names also relates to the
Law of Personification which will be explained later. Two premises behind the
present law are: (1) Names are definitions. This is more obvious in simpler
languages, but it is as true of English as of any other. Sometimes
the definition is hidden in the origin of the word, as is often the case
with those derived from Latin or Greek, but it is there. (2) Names are
mnemonic (memory) devices which trigger a range of associations. (See the
Law of Association).
LAW OF WORDS OF POWER
This is a sublaw of the Law of Names. It states that certain words trigger
changes in the inner and outer realities of the person saying them. Many of
these words are corruptions of the names of ancient Gods. Words like
"Abraxas," Osorronnophris," "Abracadabra" are examples. They have no
meaning to us today, but THEIR POWER LIES IN THE SOUNDS OF THE
WORDS THEMSELVES.
LAW OF ASSOCIATION
If two things have something in common (anything!), that thing can be used
to control both. Bell's theorem in quantum mechanics indicates that every
particle in the Universe affects every other. The following two sublaws, which
anthropologists think are the basis of "primitive" magick, are more useful in
practice. These are the Laws of Similarity and Contagion.
LAW OF SIMILARITY
Most people have heard of sympathetic magick, which is based on this
principle. Effects resemble causes. To make something fly, put feathers on it
and make chirping noises. Wave it in the air. The example is not entirely
absurd and serves to illustrate the principle. Much of the magick of
"primitive" people is of this nature. For example, rain is made by (among
other actions) sprinkling water on the ground (or by washing your car -- a
modern example of the same principle!).
LAW OF CONTAGION
This is the principle behind doll-sticking and such in "primitive" magick. This
directly relates to Bell's theorem and states that things once in physical
contact continue to influence one another after they have been separated.
This relates more to our consciousness than to things as they are in the
physical world, but defining the two is more difficult than they appear on the
surface. Thinking, feeling, and memory are associational functions of the
human brain. New data are related to existing knowledge and patterns are
established which correlate particular elements of knowledge. The overall
pattern, which includes the "personality" and the "world view" is the
METAPATTERN of all this. This metapattern we may consider to be made up
of the memories, fantasy images,
beliefs, values, techniques, rules of behavior, attitudes, etc. which make up
the individuality of the person.
LAW OF IDENTIFICATION
This law relates to those of Knowledge, Association and Personification. It
states that by complete association between your metapattern and that of
another entity, you can BECOME that entity. You can then examine your own
metapattern from the point of view of that entity. At full identification, one
"becomes" the entity. All idea of distinctness vanishes and you are
empowered with all the attributes of that entity because you ARE that entity.
The danger here is that many people become lost in the new identity as the
stronger metapattern submerges the weaker. Proper training, practice and
guidance will lessen the danger.
834
LAW OF SYNTHESIS
Two opposing ideas or items of data will be resolved into a third idea that is
more valid than the first two. This principle allows you to hold two seemingly
contradictory ideas (such as, "Electrons are particles," and "Electrons are
waves.") at the same time. Reality is as it is, not as we conceive it (or even
as we perceive it, for that matter). The wave-particle duality in physics is an
example. Physicists were nonplussed to observe in their experiments that
light behaved (depending on the experiment) sometimes like a wave and
sometimes like a particle. Light striking a surface of copper, say, releases
electrons from the surface.
This phenomenon, when examined closely, demonstrates that light is made
up of particles (now called photons) which impart energy to the electrons,
allowing them to escape. However, another experiment, in which we direct a
beam of light at some pinholes, "proves" that light is of the nature of waves.
If we direct a beam of light at an arrangement of pinholes:
---------------------------------------
III
III
I I screen--> I
III
I <--pinhole I
III
III
II
LIGHT I I
II
III
III
I <--pinhole I
III
III
III
III
---------------------------------------
assuming that we have a beam of "parallel" light (a plane wavefront), we
see the light projected onto the screen. If we cover one of the pinholes, we
see a single illuminated spot on the screen. If wwe uncover the first and
cover the second pinhole, we again see a single spot projected onto the
screen. Now, if we uncover both pinholes, what do we see? Two spots of
light? No! We see a pattern of alternating light and dark bands on the
screen. This phenomenon is due to INTERFERENCE between the crests and
troughs of the WAVES of light as they strike the screen. When two crests
occur together, or two troughs, the amplitude is doubled,
and we get a bright area. But when a crest and trough coincide, they cancel
each other, and the result is a dark spot of zero amplitude (no brightness).
The point of all this is that interference is necessarily a WAVE phenomenon.
The experiment demonstrates the wave nature of light.
How do we resolve the dilemma? By realizing that we are dealing with
something that is neither a wave nor a particle, but SOMETHING ELSE.