1-23-11 BRS State Treasury Bond App 2

3881 Building Utilization Page 5-3
List # of 1 List the number of teaching station in

Capacity
Existing/Adequate Teaching X Capacity appropriate column.
Factor
Stations
(K-2) Lower Elementary x = 2 Calculate total capacity using the
20 0
applicable capacity factor.
x
(3-5) Upper Elementary 25 0
x = 3 Enter five (5) year projected enrollment.
(6-8) Junior High 22.5 0
(9-1 2) High School 30 x

21.25 =
638 4 Calculate building utilization rate.
Sub Totals 30 638
5 Attach floor and site plan of the building.
List # of Show the rooms and category (adequate,
Capacity
Remodeled Teaching x remodeled, proposed new, closed).
Factor
Stations Number the teaching stations in
x =
consecutive order.
(K-2) Lower Elementary 20 0
x
x =
(9-1 2) High School o x

21.25 =
0
Sub Totals 0 0
List # of List # of
Capacity Capacity
Proposed New Teaching X Facility to be Closed Teaching x Capacity
Factor Factor
Stations Stations
x = x =
(K-2) Lower Elementary 20 0 (K-2) Lower Elementary 20 0
x x =
(3-5) Upper Elementary 25 0 (3-5) Upper Elementary 25 0
x x
(6-8) Junior High 22.5 0 (6-8) Junior High 22.5 0
x = x =
(9-12) High School 21.25 0 (9-12) High School 21.25 0
Sub Totals 0 0 Total Teaching Stations 0
Total Teaching Total Square Footage for Total

30 638 0
Stations Capacity Closed Facility Capacity
Current Gr. Structure 9-12 Projected

5-Year 488
Proposed Gr. Structure 9-12 Pn r/->l lmant Please transfer applicable information
to the Utilization Summary o n Page 7 of
Utilization Percentage the application.
77%
(Projected 5-Year Enrollment / Total Capacity)
Page 6-3
Facility Condition Assessment
Project Number
High School
Perform walkthrough inspection of the facility including special-use areas such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas, Please provide an overall assessment
and science labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements. of each section or comment on any
deficiencies or special circumstances:
Health Section _____________________________________ Yes No N/A

1 . Visible mold/damage does not exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks. X"
2. Indoor surfaces are free of loose and peeling paint.
3. |AiF temperature is comfortable throughout the building. X
4. j Unique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas_or^throughout the'"bui~!ding7 ~ ' "~ ~x
Overall assessment or comments:
Life Safety Section HZHm j Yes I NO j N/A

1 . | Lighted exit signs are present at each entrance/exit and are clearly visible. X
2. iJîre suppressiqn_equigment is pjesenj injotchen, science rooms and corridors. X
.•L j Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility._ X
4. [Building access is limited to select, controlled entries, X"~|
structural section Yes i NO i N/A~

1 . Inside masonry walls do not show visible signs of cracks beyond nqrrn_aj_ aging. _ X
_2_ Surface cracks do no? exist around perimeter of interior/exterior doors and windows. ____ | "x
3. Roof structure does not show visible signs of damage. __ X
4. [Building exterior is intact and does not show visible deterioration beyond" normal aging. ___ _ X
Overall assessment or comments: Some interior masonry cosmetic cracking in storeroom at loading dock area. Some interior concrete floor cosmetic cracking at library entrance.
Mechanical Section _j ^Yes j_ NO__ [ _N/A^

1. "I Windows and exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage. • X
2 jWater pressure exists [o_wash_ha_ndsL sijp_glv_water fountains, and flush toilets. _ X _
3. I Water drains quickly from sinks. _ X __ j __ j __
4, iFloor area near toilets and sinks is dry ___ X _
Dverall assessment or comments. Some air infultration at door thresholds at some exterior doors.
Electrical Section j Yes j NO | N/A

1 | Lighting system provides adequate intensity, diffusion, and distribution orFllumination. _ X
2. Electrical controls are safely protected and accessible. __________ i X ; ____ j ____
3. | Classrooms have sufficient outlets to prevent regular use of electrical extension cords. __ ___ X j _ [_
4. j The proximity~oTeTectrical systems or panels is dry and free of standing water. __ _____________ [__X __ [ __ [ _____
Jverall assessment or comments:
Certificate by Registered Architect

certify that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. * 1301032176

ignature Printed Name Firm Name and License Number
scott@intdesiQns.com 810-229-6767 810-229-2701

Dale E-mail Address Fax Number Area Code and Telephone Number
7_0
3881
Page 4-4
Project Sheet
Name of School Building: Bus Garage
Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project: Instructional Technology Description

New maintenance garage. NA
Buses.
Description of Proposal or Series 2 Project:

Site Work Description
NA
Type of Project:
0 New Building —> New Construction Square Ft 1,500 Cost per Sq Ft 103.53
EH Addition(s) —> New Addition Square Ft. Cost per Sq Ft
- D Remodeling
D Facility Closing -> O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional
D Site Work O Sell or Lease O Undetermined
Statement describing any existing environmental or usability problems the proposed project will address.
(ex: asbestos, energy use, or ADA requirements)
NA
Estimated Cost of Proposed Construction Project: (Attach analysis showing how cost estimates were calculated.)
Total Proposal/Series 1 Proposal/Series 2 Proposal/Series 3
New Construction $155,300 $155,30_

Remodeling $0
Construction Contingencies $10,9_75
Instructional Technology _$0
Loose Furnishing/Equipment $o $0
Buses $1,509,266 _$532,064_ $977,202
Site Work __ $0_ O
Site Acquisition _____ $0_
Architectural Fees and Costs _|10,690 $10,690
CM Fees and Costs $14,320 $14,320
Estimated Costs $1,700,551 $723,349 $977,202 $0

(Not including election or bond issuance costs)

I certify that the details of the proposed project(s) described above and the attached detail relative to the construction project(s) are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief
Oôtl T. I looft Integrated Oeoignc, Inr
Signature Printed Name Firm Name and License Number
10/28/10 scott(5)intdesians.com_ 810-220-6767 81^-229-2701

Date E-mail Address Fax Number Area Code and Telephone Number
Wolgast Corporation BEAVERTON RURAL SCHOOLS 11/4/2010
Integrated Designs CONCEPT BUDGET SUMMARY
School Descriptiop Budget

Beaverton Rural Schools
Bus Garage Series 1
1,500 Sq Ft Maintenance Building $105,300.00
Fuel Tank @ Bus Garage $50,000.00
Construction Cost Subtotal $155,300.00
A/E Fees $10,690.00

CM Fees $10,415.00
Construction Support Cost $3,905 00
Contingency $10,975.00
Buses $532,064.00
Furniture/Equipment $0.00
Technology $0.00
TOTAL COSTS $723,349.00

[Bus Garage

Capacity
Existing/Adequate Teaching x Capacity appropriate column.
Factor
Stations
(K-2) Lower Elementary x
20 =! 2 Calculate total capacity using the
0
x
x 3 Enter five (5) year projected enrollment.

x =
(9-1 2) High School 21.25 0 4 Calculate building utilization rate.
Sub Totals 0 0
Capacity
Remodeled Teaching x remodeled, proposed new, closed).
Factor
x =
consecutive order.
x
x =
x =
(9-1 2) High School 21.25 0
Sub Totals 0 0
List # of List # of
Capacity
Proposed New Teaching x Facility to be Closed Teaching x c to Capacity
Factor
Stations Stations
x = x
x x =
x x
x = x =
(9-1 2) High School 21.25 0 (9-1 2) High School 21.25 0

0 NA 0
Current Gr. Structure NA Projected

5-Year NA
Proposed Gr. Structure NA Pnrnllmont Please transfer applicable information
to the Utilization Summary on Page 7 of
Utilization Percentage the application.
NA
Page 6-4

Project Number
Bus Garage
Perform walkthrough inspection of the facility including special-use areas such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas, Please provide an overall assessment
and science labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements. of each section or comment on any
Health Section Yes | No ; N/A

1 j Visible mold/damage does not exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks
2. j Indoor surfaces are free of loose and peeling paint.
Air temperature is comfortable throughout the building x
4. Unique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas or throughput the building. x
Life Safety Section Yes | No J_ N/A

Lighted exit signs are present at each entrance/exit and are clearly visible. i X
2._ Fire suppression equipment is present in kitchen, science_rpoms_ and corridors. i I *
3. [Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. 1 L X
_4. j Building access is limited to select, controlled entries. X
Washroom facilities accessible, but toilet room fixtures and toilet stall configeration do not meet the current barrier free requirements
structural section Yes jI No j N/A_

1. [Inside masonry walls do not show visible signs of cracks bey qnd_nprmaI agjng^ X
2. Surface cracks do not exist around perimeter of interior/exterior doors and windows. X
j | I
3. Roof structure does not show visible signs of damage. _
_4. jBuilding exterior is intact and does not show visible deterioration beyond normal aging,
Overall assessment or comments: Existing metal siding contains cosmetic denting at several locations.
Mechanical Section Yes No ; N/A

1. Windows and exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage. X
Water pressure exists to wash hands, supply water fountains, and flush toilets.
Water drains quickly from sinks. X
_4 j Floor area near toilets and sinks is dry. X
Electrical Section Yes i No j N/A

Lighting system provides adequate intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination.
Electrical controls are safely protected and accessible.
Classrooms have sufficient outlets to prevent regular use of_ejectri_cal_extens[qnCoords.
4. JThe proximity of electTlcal systems or panels is dry and free of standing water.

I certify that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. * 1301032176

icottf5?intdesiqns com 810-229-6767 810-229-2701

E-mail Address Area Code and Telephone Number
3881 Page 4-5
Project Sheet
Name of School Building: Preschool Building

Remove and replace approximately 3,000 s.f. of roof ares. NA

NA
Type of Project:
D New Building —> New Construction Square Ft Cost per Sq Ft
D Addition(s) —* New Addition Square Ft Cost per Sq Ft
0 Remodeling
D Facility Closing ~> O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional
Energy efficiency will be increased with the removal and Replacement of roofing materials.
New Construction SO $0
Remodeling $21,900 $21,900
Construction Contingencies _$1_,645_ $1,645
Instructional Technology $0 $0
Loose Furnishing/Equipment $0
Buses $0 $0
Site Work $0
Site Acquisition $0
Architectural Fees and Costs J 1,600 J51.6JDO
CM Fees and Costs $2,145 $2,145
Estimated Costs $27,290 $27,290 $0 $0


certify that the details of the proposed project(s) described above and the attached detail relative to the construction project(s) are Irue and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. #1301032176

10/28/10 scott <8> intdesiqns.com _8JO-22_0-676J 810-229-2701 _


Capacity
Factor
Stations
x = 2 Calculate total capacity using the
x =
x = 3 Enter five (5) year projected enrollment.
X
(9-12) High School 21.25 = 0 4 Calculate building utilization rate.
Sub Totals 0 0
Capacity
Remodeled Teaching X remodeled, proposed new, closed).
Factor
x =
consecutive order.
x
x =
x =
(9-12) High School 21.25 0
Sub Totals 0 0
List # of List # of
Capacity
Proposed New Teaching * Factor Facility to be Closed Teaching x ^paci^ = Capacity
Stations Stations
x = x =
x x =
x x =
x = x =
(9-1 2) High School 21.25 0 (9-1 2) High School 21.25 0
I

0 NA
Current Gr. Structure NA Projected

5-Year NA
Proposed Gr. Structure NA F^rtiVkllm int Please transfer applicable information
the aoolication.
Utilization Percentage NA
Wolgast Corporation BEAVERTON RURAL SCHOOLS 11/4/2010
Integrated Designs CONCEPT BUDGET SUMMARY
School Description Budget

Beaverton Rural Schools
Pre-School Building
Roof Replacement $21,900.00
A/EFees $1,600.00
CM Fees $1,560.00
Construction Support Cost $585.00
Contingency $1,645.00
Finance Cost/Earned Interest $670 00
Buses $0.00
Technology $000
TOTAL BOND ISSUE COSTS $27,960.00

Page 6-5
:t Number
Preschool Building
irm walkthrough nspection of the facility including special-use are=>s such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas, Please provide an overall assessment
icience labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements. of each section or comment on any
th Section |__Yes_ |_NO j N/A

Visible mold/damage does not exist due to past or present water/moisture leaks, X
Indoor surfaces are free of loose and peeling paint. X
Air temperature is comfortable throughout the building X
Unique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas or throughout the building^ X
I assessment or comments:
Safety Section ITZZZTTZZIZZZ Yes N^ 1 N/A

Lighted exit signs are present at each entrance/exit and are clearly visible. X
Fire suppression equipment is present in kitchen, science rooms and corridors. jNA~
Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. X
Building access is limitedJo jelect, controlled entries. _ X
I assessment or comments.
oom facilities accessible, but toilet room fixtures and toilet stall configeration do not meet the current barrier free requirements
:tural section ~ !_Yes j _NO_I_ N/A

Inside masonry walls do not show visible signs of cracks Beyond normal aging. j X
Surface cracks do not exist around perimeter of interior/exterior doors and_wjndows^_ j X _
Roof structure does not show visible signs of damage. X
Building exterior is intact and does not show visible deterioration_beypnd norrna[agjn_g. _ _X
assessment or comments: Existing metal siding contains cosmetic denting at several locations
lanical Section N/A

A/indows and exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage.
A/ater pressure exists to wash hands, supply water fountains, and flush toilets.
/Vater drains quickly from sinks. _
r
loor area near toilets and sinksjs dry.__
assessment or comments:
rical Section N;A

.ighting system provides adequate intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination. _
Electrical controls are safely protected and accessible.
Classrooms have sufficient outlets to prevent regular use of e]ectrica[extension cords^
'he proximity of electrical systems or panels is dry_andjre«[ of standjnc;j/vater._

that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. # 1301032176

Printed Name Firm Name and License Number
scoH@intdesigns.com 810-229-6767
3881 Page 4-6
Project Sheet
Name of School Building: Administration Building

Remove and replace approximately 3,535 s.f. of roof area. NA

NA
Type of Project:
D New Building —> New Construction Square Ft Cost per Sq Ft
D Addition(s) —> New Addition Square Ft. Cost per Sq Ft
GD Remodeling
D Facility Closing -* O Demolish O Retain for future use O Convert to non-instructional
Energy efficiency will be increased with the removaljand replacernentôf roofing materials^. _
New Construction $o
Remodeling $9,450- $_9,450
Construction Contingencies _ 5559
Instructional Technology _5P.
Loose Furnishing/Equipment $p $0
Buses $o
Site Work $
Site Acquisition _$0 _$_p_
Architectural Fees and Costs $535 $535
CM Fees and Costs $715^ $715
Estimated Costs $11,250 $11,250 $0 $0


certify that the details of the proposed project(s) described above and the attached detail relative to the construction project(s) are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief
Scptt_T.Jjoeft_ lntegrated_Designs, Inc. #1301032176

Signature
_10/28/irj
T PrirJtecTName ~
_scott@intdesiqns.£orn 810-220-6767
Firm Mamfi and License Number
810-229-2701
Wolgast Corporation BEAVERTON RURAL SCHOOLS
Integrated Designs CONCEPT Bl IDGET SUMMARY
School Description Budget

eaverton Rural Schools
Central Office
Roof Replacement $9,450.00
A/E Fees $535.00

CM Fees $520.00
Construction Support Cost $195.00
Contingency $550.00
Buses $0.00
Technology $0.00
TOTAL COSTS $11,250.00

Administration Building
List # of Capacity 1 List the number of teaching station in

Factor
Stations
<-2) Lower Elementary x
20 = 2 Calculate total capacity using the
0
x
5-5) Upper Elementary 25 0
5-8) Junior High x

22.5 = 3 Enter five (5) year projected enrollment.
0
x =
9-1 2) High School 21.25 0 4 Calculate building utilization rate.
>ub Totals 0 0
Capacity
Remodeled Teaching remodeled, proposed new, closed).
Factor
x = consecutive order.
<-2) Lower Elementary 20 0
x
3-5) Upper Elementary 25 0
x =
5-8) Junior High 22.5 0
x =
3-1 2) High School 21.25 0
>ub Totals 0 0
List # of List* of
Capacity
Proposed New Teaching x Facility to be Closed Teaching x c P< = Capacity
Factor r*. raCiOr
Stations Stations
x = x =
(-2) Lower Elementary 20 0 (K-2) Lower Elementary 20 0
x x =
i-5) Upper Elementary 25 0 (3-5) Upper Elementary 25 0
x x
i-8) Junior High 22.5 0 (6-8) Junior High 22.5 0
x = x =
i-12) High School 21.25 0 (9-1 2) High School 2125 0
ub Totals 0 0 Total Teaching Stations 0

0 NA 0
urrent Gr. Structure NA Projected

5-Year NA
•oposed Gr. Structure NA pnmllmant Please transfer applicable information
the aoolication.
Utilization Percentage NA
. i;
Page 6-6
;t Number
Preschool Building
rm walkthrough inspection of the facility including special-use areas such as the cafeteria, art rooms, industrial arts areas, Please provide an overall assessment
cience labs. Please complete the following assessment form by responding to ALL statements. of each section or comment on any
th Section __i_Y5s_ ! NO I N/A

Visible mold/damage does not exist due to past or present water/moisture jgaks. X
Indoor surfaces are free of loose and peeling paint. x"T~"
Air temperature is comfortable throughout the building. ~"x
Unique/objectionable odors are not present in specific areas or throughout The building. X~
Safety Section j Yes i NO | N/A

Lighted exit signs are present at each entrance/exit and are clearly visible. ~X
Fire suppression equipment is present in kitchen, science rooms and_corridors. T ~NA~
Washroom facilities have barrier free accessibility. >f^
Building access is limited to select, controlled entries. "Z*T~
oom facilities accessible, but toilet room fixtures and toilet stall configeration do not meet the current barrier free requirements.
:turai section !__Yes [ _NO__|_N/A_

Inside masonry walls do not show visible signs of cracks beyond normal aging. _ NA
Surface cracks do not exist around perimeter of interior/exterior doors jjnd windows. __X
Roof structure does not show visible signs of damage _X
Building exterior is intact and does not show visible deterioration Beyond normaj aging. X
assessment or comments: Existing metal siding contains cosmetic denting at several locations.
lanical Section [ Yes J_ N_O__| N/A

Mndows and exterior doors prevent inefficient air leakage. __X
A/ater pressure exists to wash hands, supply water fountains, and flush toilets. X_
/Vater drains quickly from sinks. X
r
loor area near toilets and sinks is dry. X j j
assessment or comments
rical Section !_Yes j NO i N/A

lighting'system provides adequaTiTntensity, diffusion, and~distributibriroflTluTniiTatjonr'" X
Electrical controls are safely protected and accessible. X
Classrooms have sufficient outlets to prevent regular use of electrical extension cords. i NA
fhe proximity of electrical systems or panels is dry and free o^sja£iding_water. X

that I have assessed the factors described above and that the conditions relative to the facility are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs. Inc * 1301032176

Printed Name Firm Name and License Number
:ott(S)intdesiqns-Com 810-229-6767 810-229-2701

Utilization Summary
(Name of School District: Beaverton Rural Schools (District Code Number: 26-010
List ALL district facilities in the following order: elementary schools, junior high/middle schools, high schools, and non-instructional facilities.
Current Grade Proposed Grade Projected Adequate Pupil Remodel Pupil Total Pupil Closed Pupil
Proj No. Name of School Facility Structure Structure 5-Year Enrollment Capacity Capacity New Pu pit Capacity Capacity Utilization % Capacity
1 Primary School K-3 K-3 " 342J 310 1 20 1 70 1_ 400 86% na

2 Middle School 4-8 4-8 491 635 0| OJ 635 77% na
3 High School 9-12 9-12 488 638 0 0 638 j 76% na
-
4 Bus Garage / Maintenance na na| na na na nai na na na
SiPreshool na naj na na na| na! na na na
6 Administration Building na na na na naj naj na| na na

Bus Garage / Maintenance na na na na na na{ na| na na
— Service Building na!
i
na na | na
i
na j na na na na
I
Storage / Primary School na! na na na na! na na na na
Athletic Storage na na nai na na na naj na na
Lockers / Concessions naj na na! na na na na| nai na
j !
Press Box / Storage nai na|_ nai na na naL na na na
i ! i
iAthletic Storage na na; na] na; na na naj na na
I Storage /Middle School na! na| na na na na na na na
\ \ \ I j i
Subtotals by School District's Grade Configuration

—i—
Elementary School K-3 K-3 342 _ 310|
...r-... 20' 70 i 400 110%j
Middle School 4-8 4-8 491 635 1 Oj 0 635 77%!
Highj5chool 9- 12 9-12 488 638 1 oj 0 638 76%
Total: I 1321 1583J 20) 70 1673 82% j
Facility Summary
| Name of School District: Beaverton Rural Schools District Code Number:26-010
List ALL district facilities in the following order: elementary schools, junior high/middle schools, high schools, and non-instructional facilities
Col. 1 Col 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col 5 Col. 5 Col. 7 Col. 8 Col. 9 Col. 10 Col. 1 1 Col. 12 Col 13
Weighted Sq Ft of
Pro/". Year Average New S/le Bldg In Closed Disposition of
Mo. Facility Type' Name of School Facility Address City Built Year(s) Ren modeled Site Size (Acres) Total Sq.Ft. Age CAcres) Use? Y/N Facility Closed Facility"
1 Instructional Primary School 1 27 Tonkin Street Beaverton 1953 1962, 6 7,97 10 32,281 33.30 0 Y 0 NA
j
2 Instructional Middle School 440 South Ross Street i Beaverton 1965 198 5 16 j 34,075 3730 0 Y 0 NA
I
1
' \
3 Instructional High School 3090 Crockett Road Beaverton 1997 33 102,330 1300 0 v 0 NA
i
|
4 Bus Garage Bus Garage / Maintenance 3384 M-18 JBeaverton new i 5 8,000 NA 0 S 0 NA
5 Non-Instructional Preschool 1 06 Tonkin j Beaverton 1935 1963, 97 i 2 25,222 49.17 0 Y NA
6 Non-instructional /
Administration
Adrnjnistration Building 468 South Ross Street i Beaverton 1972 2 3,535 28 0 :,Y 0 NA
!
Non-instructional / Bus
Bus Garage / Maintenance j 1 22 Tonkin Street ! Beaverton 1 942 2 1,540 NA 0 Y 1,540 Demolish
Garage j
[ ~ "" '
Non-instructional / Service
Service Building 122 Tonkin Street JBeaverton i 1942 2 2,160 NA 0 Y 2,160 Demolish
Building _ L . _. ..
Non-instructional /
Storage / Primary 127 Tonkin Street Beaverton 1985 ! incl in Primary 280 25 0 Y 0 NA
Storage, Primary School .
incl in High
Stadium Athletic Storage 3090 Crockett Road Beaverton 1986 : 1 ,344 24 0 Y 0 NA
School
.... .... .
incl in High I
Stadium / Fieldhouse \ Lockers / Concessions 1 3090 Crockett Road Beaverton 2003 3,950 7 0 Y 0 NA
School
incl in High
Stadium | Stadium Press Box /Storage 1 3090 Crockett Road Beaverton i 1986 : 704 24 0 Y 0 NA
School
incl in High
Stadium Athletic Storage 3090 Crockett Road Beaverton ; 1976 i 448 34 0 Y 0 NA
School
incl in Middle
Storage Storage / Middle School 406 Ross Beaverton j 1992 1,728 18 0 Y 0 NA
i School
i 72 217,597 -----
"Facility Type: "Closed Facility Ref:

Instructional 1. Demolish
Non-Instructional 2. Convert to non-instr.
Bus Garage 3. Sell or lease
Storage 4. Retain for future use
Stadium 5. Undetermined
Cost Summary
Name of School District: Beaverton Rural Schools [District Code Number: 26-010
Pro/. Cosf per New Cons New Instructional Loose Fum Site A/EFees CM Fees Project Election/ Total
# Sq Foot SqFeet Construction Remodeling Contingency Technology and Equip Buses Site Work Acquisition and Costs and Costs Costs Issue Costs Cost
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 $21.36 22,000 $3,042,200 $689,594 $257,419 $196,709 $80,000 $0 $312,500 $0 $264,056 $353,671 $5,196,149 $124,115 $5,320,264
2 $20.35 0 $0 $693,550 $77,920 $54,040 $0 $0 $562,000 $0 $75,900 $101,655 $1,565,065 $37,383 $1,602,448
3 $9.32 0 5U $954,115 $143,190 $335,350 $10,000 $0 $1,487,800 $0 $181,730 $243,405 $3,355,590 $80,152 $3,435,742
4 $0.00 1,500 $155,300 $0 $10,975 $0 $0 $1,509,266 $0 $0 $10,690 $14,320 $1,700,551 $40,619 $1,741,170
5 $10.14 0 $0 $21,900 L $1,645 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,600 $2,145 $27,290 $652 $27,942
6 $33.75 0 $0 $9,450 $550 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $535 $715 $11,250 $269 $11,519
Total $3,197,500 $2,368,609 $491,699 $586,099 $90,000 $1,509,266 $2,362,300 $0 $534,511 $715,911 $11,855,895 $283,190 $12,139,085
17. % of Project Costs: (= The total of each column /the total of Column 14)
26.97% 19.98% 4.15% 4.94% 0.76% 12.73% 19.93% 0.00% 4.51% [ 6.04%| 100.00%
18. Election/Bond Issue Costs: % of Proi Cost % of Proi Cost 19. Funding:
Bond (and Local) Attorney: $29.141 0.25% Capitalized Interest: $0 0.00% Total Estimated Cost of Project: $12,139.085
Financial Advisor: $27,910 0.24% Official Statement: $11,000 0.09% LESS:
Qualification Fee: $8,900 0.08% Election Notices: $18,658 0 16% Estimated Interest Earnings: $39,125
Treasury Filing Fee: $1,193 0.01% Bond Discount: $158,488 1.34% Other (specify):
Auditor Review: $1,000 0.01% Credit Rating: $26,500 0.22%
M.A.C. Fee: 400 0.00%
Miscellaneous Costs*: 0 0.00% Total Other Costs: $283,190 2.39% AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ISSUE
$12,099,960
(Prorate the total for each project in Col 14 and distribute prorate within Col 15) (Amount to be Qualified)
'Explanation of Miscellaneous Costs:

3881, Worksheet 1: Useful Life Calculation
A school district must demonstrate that the weighted average maturity of the qualified bond issue does not
exceed 120% of the average reasonably expected useful life of the facilities, excluding land and site
improvements, being financed with the proceeds of the qualified bonds.
The following table lists the recommended average useful life of the categories of assets that should be
considered in this calculation. If a specific item is not listed, it should be assigned to the most closely related
category.
Asset Cateory Useful Life

Years
New School Building " 40
Building Improvements - interior and exterior remodeling such as plumbing, electrical" HVAC, fire ! I
suppression, security systems, elevators, etc.
Roofing 20_
Flooring
, ...... ...~ « ,. : 10
Furnishings and Equipment - furniture and fixtures that are not a structural component of a
building such as desks, chairs, tables, storage units, office equipment, copiers, fax machines,
10
communications equipment, kitchen equipment and appliances, athletic equipment, etc.
Technology Infrastructure-cables, networks, etc.

Buses
Technology (instructional and non-instructional) - computers, printers, scanners, etc.
Use the worksheet below to calculate the weighted average useful life of assets included in
projects funded by bond proceeds.
Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8

Time
Average between Allocation of Average
Useful Life Bonds Issue Related Total Costs Useful Life of
of Asset (in Date and Useful Life of Asset Expenditure Professional (Incl. Related % of Total Assets (in
Asset Type Years) Purchase from Bond Issue Date Amount Fees Fees) Cost years)
School Buildings 40 0 40 3,418,325 212,481 3,630,806 41.92% 16.77

I
Building Improvements 30 0 30 1,440,296 89,528 1,529,824 17.66% 5.30

I
Roofing 20 0 20 708,400 44,033 752,433 8.69% 1.74
Flooring 10 0 10 1 1 ,442 710 12,152 0.14% 0.01

!
Furnishing/ Equipment 10 0 10 90,000 4,607 94,607 1.09% 0.11
Technology 509,140 0.59

10 0 10 479,345 29,795 5.88%
Infrastructure
_ -
Technology (instr/non- 36,432 622,531 7.19% 0.36
5 0 5 586,099
instr)
Buses 6 0 6 1,509,266 0 1,509,266 17.43% 1.05
Total for purposes of determining weighted avg useful life 8,243,173 417,586 8,660,759 | 100.00% 25.92
120% of average useful life of assets 31.11

1-23-11 BRS State Treasury Bond App 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1-23-11 BRS State Treasury Bond App 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3881 Building Utilization Page 5-3

List # of 1 List the number of teaching station in

(9-1 2) High School 30 x

(9-1 2) High School o x

Sub Totals 0 0 Total Teaching Stations 0

Total Teaching Total Square Footage for Total

Current Gr. Structure 9-12 Projected

Facility Condition Assessment

Health Section _____________________________________ Yes No N/A

Life Safety Section HZHm j Yes I NO j N/A

structural section Yes i NO i N/A~

Mechanical Section _j ^Yes j_ NO__ [ _N/A^

Electrical Section j Yes j NO | N/A

Certificate by Registered Architect

Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. * 1301032176

scott@intdesiQns.com 810-229-6767 810-229-2701

Name of School Building: Bus Garage

Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project: Instructional Technology Description

Description of Proposal or Series 2 Project:

Total Proposal/Series 1 Proposal/Series 2 Proposal/Series 3

New Construction $155,300 $155,30_

Estimated Costs $1,700,551 $723,349 $977,202 $0

Certificate by Registered Architect

O^otl T. I looft Integrated Oeoignc, Inr

Signature Printed Name Firm Name and License Number

10/28/10 scott(5)intdesians.com_ 810-220-6767 81^-229-2701

School Descriptiop Budget

Construction Cost Subtotal $155,300.00

A/E Fees $10,690.00

TOTAL COSTS $723,349.00

List # of 1 List the number of teaching station in

x 3 Enter five (5) year projected enrollment.

Sub Totals 0 0 Total Teaching Stations 0

Total Teaching Total Square Footage for Total

Current Gr. Structure NA Projected

Facility Condition Assessment

Health Section Yes | No ; N/A

Life Safety Section Yes | No J_ N/A

structural section Yes jI No j N/A_

Mechanical Section Yes No ; N/A

Electrical Section Yes i No j N/A

Certificate by Registered Architect

Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. * 1301032176

icottf5?intdesiqns com 810-229-6767 810-229-2701

Name of School Building: Preschool Building

Description of Proposal or Series 1 Project: Instructional Technology Description

Description of Proposal or Series 2 Project:

Total Proposal/Series 1 Proposal/Series 2 Proposal/Series 3

Estimated Costs $27,290 $27,290 $0 $0

Certificate by Registered Architect

Scott T. Hoeft Integrated Designs, Inc. #1301032176

10/28/10 scott <8> intdesiqns.com _8JO-22_0-676J 810-229-2701 _

List # of 1 List the number of teaching station in

Total Teaching Total Square Footage for Total

Current Gr. Structure NA Projected

School Description Budget

Construction Cost Subtotal $21,900.00

TOTAL BOND ISSUE COSTS $27,960.00

Facility Condition Assessment

th Section |__Yes_ |_NO j N/A

Safety Section ITZZZTTZZIZZZ Yes N^ 1 N/A

:tural section ~ !_Yes j _NO_I_ N/A

lanical Section N/A