Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4. In the analysis of Top Soil for β – Endosulfan, the raw data pertaining to
control/reference shows that only one value is obtained out of 6 samples
analyzed and remaining 5 are below detection limit or not detectable
(N.D.). In residue analysis, in such a case, the single value is generally
considered as “outlier”. However, in the final report, a value of
0.002±0.004 has been reported as a representative value for 6 samples.
However, in the analysis of top soil for Endosulfan sulfate, raw data shows
that there are 3 values and 3 N.D. for control/reference. In this case, the
sum of 3 values is divided by 3 for calculating mean and 0.051 figure is
obtained as shown in the raw data. If the sum would have been divided by
6, the value would have been 0.0257±0.039. Even this value (0.0257±0.039)
is not reported in the final report. What is reported in the final report is
0.007±0.012.
6. In the analysis of top soil for Endosulfan sulfate, the raw data shows that
there is only one value obtained out of 6 in case of exposed/study. This
should be considered as outlier. Mean is 0.0017±0.004, however even
this value is not reported. What is reported in final report is 0.025±0.03.
8. In the analysis of mid soil for β –Endosulfan, the raw data shows that
there is only one value obtained for exposed/study, and remaining 5 are
N.D. Therefore, ideally in the final report, N.D. should be reported since
a single value should be considered as an “outlier”. If you calculate
mean, it will be 0.0005±0.0012. The value was first printed in the final
report as 0.005±0.001, which was corrected (see Annexure-8 in the final
report) as 0.0005±0.0012. However, this value is below detection limit.
9. In the analysis of mid soil for Endosulfan sulfate, the value for
control/reference is reported in the final report as 0.007±0.012.
2
However, the raw data indicates that said value should be
0.0042±0.0065.
10. In the analysis of lower soil for α – Endosulfan, the value for
control/reference is reported in the final report as 0.0623±0.06.
However, raw data indicates that the value should be 0.086±0.053.
11. In the analysis of lower soil for Endosulfan sulfate, the value for
control/reference is reported in the final report as 0.0005±0.001.
However, the raw data shows that all values are N.D. and hence it should
be reported as N.D.
3
• Very high standard deviation from mean implies that data is
skewed and hence most of the residue levels fall below detection
limit.
4
Annex-1
5
6
7
Some values reported in NIOH report are below detection limit. Detection limits
for alpha-Endosulfan, beta-Endosulfan and Endosulfan-sulfate are reported to
be 1, 1 and 3 ppb respectively in NIOH report. However, values as low as
0.0004 ppb have been reported. Even after concentrating as described in the
procedure given in the report, this is far below detection limit. Moreover, for
many of the values, standard deviation is several hundred times greater than
the mean (please see below). This implies that the data is highly skewed.
Under circumstances, most of the values will fall below detection limit. This is
not scientifically valid and hence it is unacceptable.
8
Annex-2
9
10
11
12