Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY JOEY SEILER Nancy Gertner reduced the damages to and, most importantly to Nesson, the
$67,500, but Tenenbaum and his team jury’s role in assessing these damages is
During winter break, while most stu-
The HL Record
believe the award is still too high. flawed.
dents were trying to forget about exams Copyright law provides for statutory “When Congress created these statu-
and the impending start of J-Term, sev- damages between $750 and $30,000 per tory damages, they explicitly imagined
eral students’ work appeared in a brief infringed work and up to $150,000 per that it would be judges who had the wis-
filed with the First Circuit appealing the work for “willful” infringement. Nesson dom to assess them,” said Nesson. When News
damages award in a file-sharing case. and five students (Jason Harrow ‘11, the Supreme Court ruled that juries had
Prof. Charles Nesson ’63 and a team of Phillip Hill ‘13, Andrew Breidenbach to be involved, though, it “brought a con- • HLAB Elects 2011 Board
Harvard Law students represent Joel ‘11, Eric Fletcher ‘11, and Nathan Love- stitutional requirement that the jury not • WLA Plans Equality Conference
Tenenbaum in a lawsuit filed against him joy ‘13) assembled this brief to raise be left completely at sea.”
by the Recording Industry of America for three arguments about the damages on Instead, Tenenbaum’s jury was in- Culture
copyright infringement for illegally shar- appeal: extraordinary damages assessed structed that infringement occurred and
ing music files. After losing at the trial against people not making money from given a form to fill out with one range of • “Tacky Prom” is Back
level, Tenenbaum was on the hook for the infringement is “absurdly extreme,” damages for innocent infringement and • Indie Band to Play Boston
$675,000 in damages, or $22,500 each said Nesson; Congress never intended for another for willful infringement. There
for the 30 songs he was accused of shar- this regime to be applied to normal peo- was no context given, said Nesson, that
ing over Kazaa. District Court Judge ple as opposed to commercial infringers; NESSON, cont’d on pg. 2
Harvard Legal Aid Bureau Elects 2011 Board
Page 2 Harvard Law Record January 31, 2011
BY JENNY PAUL
Members of the Harvard Legal Aid
Bureau elected a new board of direc-
tors in January to manage Bureau serv-
ices and shepherd a development plan
to expand its legal service offerings in
the coming months.
Ten second-year law students will
serve on the Bureau’s board of direc-
tors for 2011. The Bureau’s 50 second-
and third-year “student advocates,”
who represent clients from Boston and
surrounding areas, elected the new
board.
The election process is “pretty infor-
mal,” newly elected President David
Williams said.
“A few weeks before elections start,
people talk about ideas they have, but
there’s definitely no official campaign-
ing,” Williams said. “It’s very colle-
gial. We’re all kind of one big happy
family.”
Williams said board members take DAVID BRODY/HL RECORD STAFF
on the day-to-day management of the
Bureau. Members of the Board manage
The 2011 HLAB Board of Directors poses in front of Bureau headquarters. Front (l-r): Training Director
case assignments, case files, recruit- Tyeesha Dixon ‘12; Research/Tech Director Anush Emelianova ‘12; Outreach Director Sam Levine ‘12;
ment of new student advocates, and fi- Vice President of Practice Standards Marcia Hook ‘12; Communications Director Sam Ferriss ‘12. Rear
nancial issues, he said. (l-r): President David Williams ‘12; Membership Director Rebecca Livengood ‘12; Executive Director
“Basically, we’re almost like our Emily Hostage ‘12; Secretary/Treasurer Adrianna Rodriguez ‘12; Intake Director Michael Lumley ‘12.
own private law firm,” he said. “Run- straining order disputes, Williams said. said. “There’s also a large community Department of Unemployment Assis-
ning an organization like this takes a Each student works on about four to five sense, too, which all of us enjoy and get tance. If the pilot program is successful,
lot of manpower….We don’t have a cases at a time and is supervised by a a lot out of.” the board may decide to roll out a more
huge support staff like a big firm’s clinical instructor. Clinical Prof. David The Bureau is also developing an em- comprehensive employment law pro-
going to have. A lot of it is really peo- Grossman ’88 serves as managing attor- ployment discrimination pilot program gram in the fall of 2011, Williams said.
ple who are dedicated to the organiza- ney for the Bureau. this semester to supplement its current "Creating a comprehensive employ-
tion and would be good at doing these Because students choose the cases the employment law practice, Williams said. ment law practice will not only give Bu-
particular tasks.” Bureau takes on, each student advocate Currently, the Bureau represents clients reau members more diverse practice
Much of the Bureau’s work is cen- is personally invested in the Bureau, in wage and hour cases, where clients opportunities, but it also fills a large need
tered in housing and family law, so stu- Williams said. seek to recover unpaid or underpaid in the community. "In these tough eco-
dents choose to concentrate in one of “There’s a level of investment and wages from employers. The Bureau also nomic times when jobs are scarce, pro-
those areas. They then receive cases in- dedication that you just don’t get with represents clients in unemployment in- tecting workers' rights is more important
cluding post-foreclosure and eviction your traditional clinical program,” he surance hearings at the Massachusetts than ever."
Will Eliminate
NESSON, cont’d from pg. 1 law may be a bit dated.
would encourage jurors to consider dif- “He recognizes in his opinion that the
Disruption
by the top number they’re given on the “I think that’s a real straw in the wind.”
scale,” said Nesson. “It’s a very odd Alito recognized the lack of a circuit
thing because the jury is instructed they split and left, in his dissent, the door
can return a judgment that the judge open for another opportunity. By the
herself found would be unconstitu- time a Supreme Court appeal rolls
tional,” referring to Judge Gertner’s re- around, though, new students may need
change,” he said. “The consistent duction of the damages by a factor of to play a role in Tenenbaum’s case.
EIP, cont’d from pg. 1
message I’ve heard from employers is, ten. Harrow, who Nesson describes as the
also said the callback interview sched-
‘We’ll make the necessary adjust- That system may be changing. Two head of the team, has worked on the
ule will be more flexible for students
ments, because we want to hire from years ago, said Nesson, it was almost case since his second year. As part of
and employers, who can choose to
Harvard.’” impossible to drum up sympathy for the winning Ames Moot Court team
schedule the second-round interviews this past year, Harrow had already
Hiring data from the 2010 EIP pro- Tenenbaum. Now that the focus of the
in either August or early September. logged quite a few hours in mock trials
gram and information on the 2011 case is on damages, more people find
Weber said he spoke with student and writing briefs. Nesson hopes to in-
program will be available later in the the law unreasonable, he said. With a
leaders, administrators, and faculty similar case proceeding in Minnesota clude him in the oral argument before
before finalizing the change, and they spring semester, Weber said. He cau-
against Jammie Rasset-Thomas, repre- the First Circuit as well, which offers a
voiced support for the new schedule. tioned that first-year students do not
sented pro bono by Kiwi Camara ’04, different perspective.
Law firm recruiters have also been have to worry about planning for their
there may soon be a split in circuits re- “It's hard to admit this after all the
supportive of the change, Weber said, EIP experience yet. time my teammates and I put into moot
garding statutory damages. That, says
though he noted that firms would “We haven’t spent a lot of time court, but Ames is not real. Our ‘client’
Nesson, could be all that’s needed.
rather have all law schools schedule other than letting students know the in the Finals, Kermit McBride, never
In Nov. 2010, the Supreme Court de-
interview programs later in the year, [EIP] dates, because it shouldn’t be a nied certiorari for Harper v. Maverick really went to jail. But Joel is a real per-
closer to when the firms will actually priority of theirs right now,” Weber Recording Company, a similar case son, and right now he has a judgment
be utilizing the summer classes they said. “They should be getting re-ac- against a 16-year-old file sharer. She against him that says that he has to pay
hire. climated to school, focusing on their was unable to raise an innocent in- $67,500 to some of the biggest compa-
“I think in a perfect world, law firms studies, learning about all the differ- fringer defense, as 17 U. S. C. §402(d) nies on the planet for sharing 30 songs,”
would prefer that all of the hiring was ent things they can do with a law de- essentially precludes innocence when said Harrow. “That means that every
done outside of August, but we’re not gree, and then we can start focusing notice is given on “the published word we say to the court has to further
in a perfect world, and, quite candidly, on the summer.” phonorecord.” As Justice Alito said at the goal of reversing that — not of
they understood why we made the the time, arguing to grant certiorari, that making us look good, like in Ames.”
GET SET TO TAKE TACKY BACK AT
January 31, 2011 Page 3
Twenty Harvard Law students spent J-Term in San Jose, Costa Rica for a course taught by Profs. James Caval-
laro and Stephanie Brewer.
I was in a 20-person class called "Doctrine and Practice of the Inter-American Court I conducted research for a paper on legislation before the Brazil-
of Human Rights." As the Court is located in San Jose, Costa Rica, the course was ian National Congress that would effectuate a major overhaul of
taught there. This gave us the opportunity to tour the Court and meet with one of the the notoriously inefficient Brazilian tax system. I had the oppor-
lawyers for the Court (the equivalent of a clerk) who explained to us how the Court tunity to speak with the main architects of the proposal, including
functioned. The course was co-taught by Prof. James Cavallaro and Prof. Stephanie the Attorney General Luís Inácio Adams. The project provided
Brewer, who have both litigated cases before the Court and were able to provide in- me the unique chance to observe a legal regime in a state of fun-
sight into how they strategized both the legal and advocacy aspects of cases. We also damental flux, as the government works to accommodate rapid
had the opportunity to meet with Judge Sonia Picado, a former judge of the Court and modernization and economic development.
the first woman to serve on the Court. She told us about her experience serving on -Jason Gross ‘12
the Court, including the discrimination she experienced as a woman, and answered
questions about her opinion on the development of jurisprudence at the Court.
-Katie Fischl ‘12
Jason Gross ‘12 and Brazilian Attorney General Luis Inacio Adams pose after meeting in the Attorney General’s
office in the capital city of Brasilia.
STUDENTS TRADE SNOW FOR SUN, FUN,
January 31, 2011 Harvard Law Record Page 5
Gaurav Toshniwal ‘12, Jason Gross ‘12, and Parker Zangoei ‘12 in front of the Escadaria Selaron, a landmark in the bohemian neighbor-
hood of Lapa in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
I spent four weeks in Brazil during January term this year — three weeks in
Rio de Janeiro and one in Sao Paulo. The purpose of my trip was to do research
and conduct interviews that would assist me in writing a paper about the Brazil-
ian Bar Association's regulations for foreign firms practicing in Brazil. The
Brazilian economy has taken off in the last several years, and with a booming
economy comes a boom in investors seeking to find an entry into the growing I travelled to Brazil to work on an independent paper on financial regulation.
market. Naturally, where investment increases, so does legal work, and in the The paper examines Brazilian financial regulation and macroeconomic policy
past two years, thirteen major international firms have opened offices in Brazil. during the recent financial crisis and contrasts Brazil’s relatively successful per-
Brazil, like most countries, has rules that govern who can and who cannot es- formance with the more turbulent experience of other big commodity exporters
tablish a legal practice within the country and in what kind of work such prac- such as Russia. I spent the first two weeks of my trip at a Brazilian law school,
tice can engage. With the vast influx of international firms, there exists some Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV), in Rio de Janeiro, where he discussed and de-
tension in what the Brazilian Bar Association rules are and how they will be in- veloped his paper with professors at that school. I also travelled to São Paulo to
terpreted and implied — not to mention the political pressures playing a role in interview various market participants including risk managers at financial in-
the background. I was able to interview several partners at law firms in Brazil, stitutions, economists at private sector banks and portfolio managers and traders
both at local firms and at international firms with an office in the country. Out at investment management firms.
of these interviews, I was able to gain insight into the perspective of each group -Gaurav Toshniwal ‘12
and their individual expectations about the future of the countries expanding
legal market.
I've always found traveling to be a worthwhile endeavor, and Brazil was no
exception. Experiencing a new culture and its people was a great experience
that proved for a great time. I'm currently enrolled in David Wilkins's course on
Global Lawyers and Emerging Economies where I continue to study Brazil and
plan to go back in, hopefully, the not too distant future.