A journalist was invited to attend a meeting as an observer at your premises. The director of planning, property and human settlement infrastructure ordered all members of the media to leave the room. Mr Davidson insisted that it was a planning meeting and that the press had to leave. The journalist left the meeting with one other journalist, stating for the record that he was withdrawing under protest.
A journalist was invited to attend a meeting as an observer at your premises. The director of planning, property and human settlement infrastructure ordered all members of the media to leave the room. Mr Davidson insisted that it was a planning meeting and that the press had to leave. The journalist left the meeting with one other journalist, stating for the record that he was withdrawing under protest.
A journalist was invited to attend a meeting as an observer at your premises. The director of planning, property and human settlement infrastructure ordered all members of the media to leave the room. Mr Davidson insisted that it was a planning meeting and that the press had to leave. The journalist left the meeting with one other journalist, stating for the record that he was withdrawing under protest.
I was invited to attend a meeting as an observer yesterday at your premises at 11.30am.
The invitation was issued by TATIB Foundation, which had arranged the meeting with certain of your officials. Upon arrival, all present were asked to state their names and interest in the proceedings, which we did. The director planning, property and human settlement infrastructure, Mr Basil Davidson, who had unilaterally assumed the chair of the meeting, ordered all members of the media to leave the room, failing which the meeting would not proceed. I challenged Mr Davidson, asking why, to which he replied he’d been instructed that the press may not be present at such “planning meetings” where matters of a “technical nature” were to be discussed. TATIB’s Ian Odendaal challenged the assertion that it was a planning meeting, pointing out it was a public meeting convened at the request of TATIB, as a means of following up formally on what had transpired iro certain undertakings made in previous meetings with municipal officials in the course of 2010, on the same subject. Mr Davidson insisted that it was a planning meeting and that the press had to leave. I asked Mr Davidson who had given the instruction to which he replied “It wasn’t a person, it’s a policy”. I asked for a copy of the policy, at which point he became flustered and said “We’ll have to get our hands on it and get it to you.” Mr Davidson did say that the media were welcome to have access to the minutes of the meeting. He also said in response to a request from me, that I was at liberty to speak directly to any of the municipal officials present at the meeting if I sought clarification from them about their contributions to the meeting as noted in the minutes. I then left the meeting with one other journalist, stating for the record that I was withdrawing under protest, in order to ensure that the meeting did actually take place. I would be grateful if you could help me with a few questions: 1. 1. I understands that you were invited, initially accepted the invitation then withdrew from the meeting. Is this indeed so, and if so, why did you not attend the meeting? 2. 2. In your absence, was Mr Davidson granted any delegated authority, and if so what was the nature and extent of that delegated authority? 3. 3. With regard to Mr Davidson ordering the media to leave: was he carrying out your or somebody else’s instructions, and if so whose? 4. 4. If indeed there is a formal written policy to exclude the media from meetings of a “planning nature” may I see that policy, and could you please explain the motivation for such a policy? 5. 5. If he was not carrying out anybody’s explicit instructions, and there is no such official policy, did he act within his powers? 6. 6. The answers to the above questions notwithstanding, what is your view of the manner in which Mr Davidson acted in ejecting the media from the meeting? In other words, did he have the right to do so, and do you support his actions? 7. 7. If you support his actions in ejecting the media, then I must ask what does the Municipality have to hide?
I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Yours truly, Norman McFarlane Correspondent
Bolander Lifestyle & Property
Cape Community Newspapers A division of Independent Newspapers Cape Ltd Office: +27 21 852 8932 Mobile: +27 82 554 0707