Dr Zakir Naik s fraud exposed

While I have always been critical of his approach and conclusions, I always admi
red Dr Zakir Naik s sincerity and loyalty to Muslims. I was impressed by his gigan
tic efforts in studying thousands of pages of scriptures and selecting verses th
at could be used to derive whatever crazy interpretations he has derived to prov
e Muhammad in all world scriptures. I always used to wonder how he could gain al
l the time and energy to do so despite such a busy schedule of lecturing world a
round!
But suddenly I came across a book Muhammad in World Scriptures by Maulana Abdul Ha
que Vidyarthi written in 1936. And I was shocked to find that Dr Zakir Naik has
done NOTHING MORE THAN simply copying-pasting from this book, mostly word-to-wor
d and cooked up his own original research which he uses to claim that he is an exp
ert in Comparative Religion . This is blatant plagiarization! And that too from a s
ource that his followers consider worse than Kafirs.
So all Dr Zakir Naik has done is copying from works of another person, memorizin
g those and claiming all the fame for himself! And he did this so blindly that h
e did not bother even see the background of the original writer or how he has ba
ckstabbed his followers in the process.
Because Maulana Adbul Haque Vidyarthi was not an ordinary Muslim.
On contrary, he belonged to a cult which almost the entire Muslim world, and esp
ecially the sects which believe in ideology of Dr Zakir Naik considers as non-Mu
slim. They are in fact banned in Pakistan and many other countries. Ask any Musl
im scholar, and he would start hurling abuses on them for disgracing Islam and M
uhammad.
Yes, I am referring to the Ahmadiyya or Qadiyani cult. Maulana Abdul Haque Vidya
rthi was a disciple of its founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed who is considered worse t
han a Kafir by all Muslims who are fan of Dr Zakir Naik.
The reasons why Muslims hate Ahmadiyyas and refuse to consider them as Muslims a
re because they hold certain beliefs that no Muslim and follower of Dr Zakir Nai
k would dare to agree. Some are as follows:
a. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed was a Prophet or Messenger, and th
is is shirk unpardonable sin as per Muslims
b. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed continued to receive new revelatio
ns
c. Ahmadiyyas believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmed to be a Messiah
d. Ahmadiyyas believe that Ram, Krishna, Buddha, Ashoka and Guru Nanak were also
Prophets
e. Ahmadiyyas believe that Kalki Avatar would also be the final Prophet
and most importantly, the founder of Ahmadiyya cult had hurled abuses and even c
ursed to Hell those who refused to believe in his prophethood!
The concept of Avtar is a shirk as per Islam. All Islamic Madarsa teach books of M
aulvi Md Ismail which specifically states that anyone believing in Avtars or fur
ther Prophets or Avtars as Prophets is doing shirk .
Dr Zakir Naik knows all this that is why in FAQ on Hinduism, he refused to accep
t that Vedas can be revelations.
But he forgot that the material he has used to write other articles are directly
lifted from Maulana Abdul Haque s writings who agrees that Vedas are revelations.
Thus proving Prophet in Vedas or Bhavishya Puran is fine with Ahmadiyyas becau
se that is how they justify prophethood of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad also.
But for all other Muslims, on whose faith popularity of Dr Zakir Naik rests, thi
s is shirk .
While these writings do not affect Hindus or even Buddhists, Christians etc much
, they definitely backstab a devout Muslim.
In summary, Dr Zakir Naik is guilty of :
a. Copying directly, even word to word, from works of Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyar
thi, an Ahmadiyya without even quoting his references
b. Using his own name instead to falsely proclaim that he is expert on comparati
ve religion
c. Cheating with other Muslims who consider Ahmadiyya and their beliefs to be wo
rse than those of Kafirs
d. Backstabbing his blind followers who quote his works without realizing that D
r Zakir Naik has made them a sacrificial goat at mercy of Qadianis/ Ahmadiyyas.
e. Trying to prove Vedas and Puran contain revelations of Muhammad but also refu
sing to clear admit Vedas as revelations. Thus he has deliberately not made clea
r whether in reality Dr Zakir Naik is a Qadiyani or not
It seems obvious that Dr Zakir Naik is actually a Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya in disguise
trying to fool common Muslims. But why does he need to put this disguise? is it
because Ahmadiyyas are persecuted in all Muslim countries? Or is it that he is
a spy with some other hidden agenda. Or perhaps, the way he claims to have disco
vered new researches in Quran that even Allah, Muhammad, Ali et al could not dis
cover, he is laying foundation of his own Prophethood!
Only Dr Zakir Naik knows what is the real truth and what is his true mission. Bu
t his backstabbing has left his blind followers nowhere. Either they will have t
o admit to Ahmadiyya beliefs, which is the complete foundation of his writings a
nd research or regret their faith in Dr Zakir Naik being a Muslim.
And as per Islamic Criminal Law, that Dr Zakir Naik is such a great fan of, he h
imself can decide what should be the most appropriate punishment for him. Sharia
says that a thief s hands should be chopped off. Hadiths say that one who deserts
his faith or community should be killed. This is time to test how sincere are D
r Zakir Naik and Muslims who have followed him so far, to the teachings of their
own divine texts.
I am attaching the scan of the book with this post so that everyone can see Dr Z
akir Naik s fraud with his own people themselves. You can download original here.
You can view (not-so) original article(s) of Dr Zakir Naik at IRF website: http:
//www.irf.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=128 to com
pare with the original.
To know more about Qadiyanis, please visit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophethood_%28Ahmadiyya%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmadiyya_Muslim_Community
or any Qadiyani site for that matter.
Addendum:
Here I provide comparison of work of Dr Zakir Naik and Maulana Vidyarthi, as exp
lained by a Qadiyani Zahid Aziz.
1. Zakir Naik s article gives various prophecies under four headings. Under the fi
rst heading (I) are three prophecies from the book Bhavishya Purana. The first o
f these is given as follows:
A malecha (belonging to a foreign country and speaking a foreign language) spirit
ual teacher will appear with his companions. His name will be Mohammad. Raja (Bh
oj), after giving this Maha Dev Arab (of angelic disposition) a bath in the Panc
hgavya and the Ganga water (i.e. purifying him of all sins), offered him the pre
sent of his sincere devotion and showing him all reverence said, I make obeisanc
e to thee. O Ye! The pride of mankind, the dweller in Arabia, Ye have collected
a great force to kill the Devil and you yourself have been protected from the ma
lecha opponents.

This is also the first prophecy in Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi s book. It is ident
ical with the quotation in Zakir Naik s article. Except that in the Maulana s book t
he word malecha is spelt as malechha, and his quotation has the following extra
words at the end: O Ye! The image of the Most Pious God, the biggest Lord, I am a
slave to thee, take me as one lying on thy feet.
2. After quoting the prophecy, Zakir Naik s article draws out six points from it.
The Maulana, after quoting the prophecy, lists ten points. We find that Zakir Na
ik s first three points are the same as the Maulana s first three points, and his po
ints (4), (5) and (6) are the same as numbers (10), (7) and (6) respectively of
the Maulana. The wording is also very similar.
For example, point (3) in both begins with the words: Special mention is made of
the companions of the Prophet .
3. Following these six points, there are two further comments in Zakir Naik s arti
cle. The first is in answer to the objection that Raja Bhoj lived in the 11th ce
ntury C.E. The objection and its answer as given in this article are exactly as
in the Maulana s book, namely, that there was not just one Raja Bhoj. The article
says:
The Egyptian Monarchs were called as Pharaoh and the Roman Kings were known as C
aesar, similarly the Indian Rajas were given the title of Bhoj.
while the Maulana s book has:
Just as the Egyptian monarchs were known as Pharaohs and the Roman kings were ca
lled Kaisers, similarly, the Indian rajas were given the epithet of Bhoj
4. The second comment relates to the part of the prophecy about giving the promi
sed one a bath in the Ganges, and the article says:
The Prophet did not physically take a bath in the Panchgavya and the water of Ga
nges. Since the water of Ganges is considered holy, taking bath in the Ganges is
an idiom, which means washing away sins or immunity from all sorts of sins. Her
e the prophecy implies that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was sinless, i.e. Maasoom
The same comment is found in the Maulana s book in the following words:
Another point which requires elucidation is the Prophet s taking bath in Panchgavya a
nd the water of the Ganges. This did not, of course, actually happen as it was o
nly a vision; so we give it the interpretation that the Prophet will be purged o
f and made immune from all sorts of sins.
5. The second prophecy from the book Bhavishya Purana in Zakir Naik s article is a
lso the second prophecy in the Maulana s chapter. It begins with the words:
The Malecha have spoiled the well-known land of the Arabs. Arya Dharma is not to
be found in the country.
The wording of the entire prophecy (of which about one-tenth is given above) is
identical in the article and the book.
6. Following the prophecy, Zakir Naik s article makes ten points about it, while t
he Maulana s book makes twelve points. Naik s first two points are the same as the M
aulana s first two points. His 3rd to his 10th point are the same as the Maulana s p
oints (5) to (12), in the same order.
7. The third and final prophecy from the book Bhavishya Purana in Zakir Naik s art
icle begins as follows:
Corruption and persecution are found in seven sacred cities of Kashi, etc
In the Maulana s book also, this is the next prophecy, and is given in almost the
same words.
8. We now reach the second heading (II) in Zakir Naik s article. Under this are gi
ven three prophecies from the Atharva Veda. In the Maulana s book also, these are
the prophecies that occur next.
Each and every point noted in the article about these prophecies is to be found
in the Maulana s book, in the same order. Below I list the chief aspects of these
prophecies as mentioned in Zakir Naik s article and place in parenthesis the page
number in Muhammad in World Scriptures where the same is mentioned:
Kuntap, which is the name of some chapters of the Atharva Veda, stands for Bakka
h, a name of Makkah.
The word Narashansah means the praised one and refers to the Holy Prophet.
The Holy Prophet is prophesied as the camel-riding rishi.
He is called Mamah Rishi and given certain signs such as a hundred gold coins, t
en chaplets, etc.
He is called Rebh, which means the same as the name Ahmad .
The battle of the Allies of the Holy Prophet s time is described and the word karo
refers to the Holy Prophet.
The conquest of Makka is prophesied and the Holy Prophet is termed as an abandhu
, meaning a helpless man.
9. Coming now to the third heading (III) in Zakir Naik s article, under it one pro
phecy is briefly mentioned, to the effect that the Sanskrit word sushrava in the
Rig Veda applies to the Holy Prophet. The same is in the Maulana s book.
10. The fourth and final heading in Zakir Naik s article gives one prophecy, which
is from the Sama Veda, and it is translated as follows:
Ahmed acquired from his Lord the knowledge of eternal law. I received light from
him just as from the sun.
This prophecy is found in similar words in the Maulana s book.
11. Zakir Naik s article then makes three points about this prophecy. The first of
these is that the word Ahmad here has been read by previous translators not as a
name but as Ahm at hi and therefore they translated the mantra as alone have acq
uired the real wisdom of my father . These three points under this prophecy are fo
und in the Maulana s discussion.
12. At this point Zakir Naik s article comes to an end and so does the chapter The
Prophet in the Hindu Scriptures in Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi s book.
It can be seen that the article by Zakir Naik is nothing at all more than a grea
tly compressed version of certain parts of the Maulana s treatment of the subject,
following exactly the same order as in the Maulana s book.
No doubt a later author can make use of the work of an earlier one, but if he be
nefits substantially from it then integrity requires that he must acknowledge th
e source.
In this case, the later author has merely repeated the results of the earlier wo
rk without any contribution at all by himself, and with no mention of the earlie
r work.
Do Hindu scriptures contain any Divine revelations?
The research by the Maulana was based on the teaching of Islam that prophets fro
m God had appeared among all nations before the Prophet Muhammad. Muslim scholar
s had generally limited this to the Israelite prophets and a few others.
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad revived and laid stress on this unique teaching and co
ncluded from it that the great sacred persons of the Hindu religion must have be
en true prophets and its scriptures must have been Divine revelations originally
. It was on the basis of this belief that the Maulana found prophecies about the
Holy Prophet Muhammad in Hindu scriptures. This is why, in explaining the secon
d prophecy given above, the Maulana writes:
The coming prophet will attest the truth of the Aryan faith.
However, Dr Zakir Naik has stated, in a different place, that the Vedas may not
be revealed scriptures. Answering the question, whether we can consider the Veda
s and the other Hindu Scriptures to be the revelations of God?, he replies:
There is no text in the Quran or Sahih Hadith mentioning the name of the revelat
ion that was sent to India. Since the names of the Vedas or other Hindu scriptur
es are no where to be found in Quran and Sahih Hadith, one cannot say for sure t
hat they were the revelations of God. They may be the revelation of God or may n
ot be the revelation of God.
If nothing at all in them was revealed by God, then how did prophecies about the
advent of the Holy Prophet come to be in these books? If they may not be revela
tions at all, then it is also possible that the quotations from them given by Dr
Zakir Naik may not be prophecies about the Holy Prophet Muhammad revealed by Go
d.
Interestingly, in his article Dr Naik has actually copied the Maulana s statement
above: The coming prophet will attest the truth of the Aryan faith, which means
that the Holy Prophet confirmed that those scriptures were originally revealed b
y God. Perhaps Dr Naik did not realise that this contradicts his own belief expr
essed elsewhere.
Zakir Bhai, MBBS defends Halal meat Answering Zakir Naik

Islam definitely means peace in Arabic. However fake Islamic representatives like
Zakir Bhai, MBBS (Dr Zakir Naik) are bent on proving the contrary. We have alrea
dy seen how Dr Zakir Naik, who claims to be a Wahabi, is actually a Qadiyani wit
h an agenda of his own. (Refer the expose on his fraud writings).
It is not a surprise that the world sees a brutal history in Islam, if people li
ke Dr Zakir Naik continue to remain its representative. We shall not dwell into
the historical part, but would review another extract from a book claimed to be
written by Dr Zakir Abdul Karim Naik Answer to Non-Muslims Common Questions About
Islam .
I am not sure from where Dr Zakir Naik has lifted the material for this book, no
w that we already know that all he does is to copy-paste from previous books fro
m copyrighted Qadiyani sources without acknowledging the author (since Qadiyanis
are considered non-Muslims by most Muslims especially Wahabis)
But very honestly, if one replaces Dr Zakir Naik s name with some other non-Muslim
name, this books appears to be a book of dark humor to humiliate Islam written
by an enemy of Islam. When I first got the copy of the book, I thought it was cr
eated by an anti-Muslim to denigrate Islam and Zakir Bhai, MBBS. But when I sear
ched on internet and found this to be actually written to promote Islam, I was s
hocked!
But now that we know the hidden agenda of Zakir Bhai, MBBS, I would request my M
uslim brothers and sisters to ensure they are not sharing this book Answer to No
n-Muslims Common Questions About Islam and promoting defamation of Islam which mea
ns peace.
We have already briefly seen how Zakir Bhai, MBBS has made mockery of Islam by g
iving funny reasons to justify polygamy in this post.
In present post, we shall discuss another topic from Answer to Non-Muslims Common
Questions About Islam and see why with friends like Zakir Bhai, MBBS, who needs e
nemies.

EATING NON-VEGETARIAN FOOD (Page 18-21)

Dr Naik starts with usual details of ayats from Quran permitting non-vegetarian
food and stating that even a vegetarian can be a Muslim. Then he goes to discuss
typical health benefits of non-vegetarian food which have been debated and cont
ested for long. We shall not dwell into those and recommend to go through a vari
ety of resources available on internet.
(The purpose of this article is not to debate vegetarian food vs non-vegetarian
food, but to see how Dr Zakir Naik is humiliating Islam).
Suddenly Dr. Zakir Naik gets bizarre. He claims, One may ask, if Almighty God wan
ted humans to have only vegetables, why did He provide us also with pointed teet
h? It is logical that He expected us to need and to have both vegetarian as well
as non-vegetarian food.
(Comment:
1. I am sure Zakir Bhai, MBBS who claims to be an MBBS knows at least that there
are large number of vegetarian food that require tearing and hence use of point
ed teeth (canines). A simple example is sugarcane. In fact almost all vegetarian
food that are hard require use of pointed teeth!
2. The pointed teeth (canine) in humans are not as large and pointed as in case
of carnivorous animals. In humans, they are of same size as other teeth. In fact
, it is the vegetarians who give this argument to justify vegetarianism!
3. Thus I am not sure if Zakir Bhai, MBBS actually wrote this to support Islamic
non-vegetarianism or make of mockery of it)

He goes further berserk and states, If Almighty God wanted us to have only vegeta
bles then why did He give us a digestive system that can digest both vegetarian
as well as non-vegetarian food?
(Comment:
1. I now sincerely doubt if Zakir Bhai, MBBS is an MBBS in first place. Maybe he
followed Munna Bhai is getting the degree. Or perhaps he does not check the con
tent before copy-pasting. Or perhaps he is doing it deliberately, being a Qadiya
ni.
2. Our digestive system can digest even human flesh and blood. In fact many part
s of human bodies can provide large amounts of nutrients. Does it mean we should
start eating dead bodies instead of burying them and drinking their blood?
3. Even if humans eat their own excreta, the digestive system would process it o
ne more time. Do we start eating that?
4. Now some followers of Zakir Bhai, MBBS have started quoting from Sahih Bukhar
i and Sahih Muslim, to justify that even saliva is good for health!
See some examples:
Muhammad used his saliva to soften a date, and then gave it to an infant to suck (
Sahih Bukhari, 25.5340, 5341, 5345)
When Anas s son was born Muhammad fed him with dates mixed with his (Muhammad s) sal
iva and gave him the name Abdullah (Sahih Bukhari, 31.6013)
Muhammad s saliva is good for children. He used to spit into the mouth of suckling
children, and his saliva would satisfy them until nightfall (Ash Shifa, p.184)
If a baby sucked Muhammad s tongue, the baby became quiet (Ash Shifa, p.184)
He gave al-Hasan and al-Husayn his tongue to suck. They had been weeping from th
irst and upon sucking Muhammad s tongue they became quiet (Ash Shifa, p.184)
People rubbed Muhammad s spittle on their faces (Ash Shifa, p.237)
Muhammad recommended that you can spit on your cloth and then fold it and rub it (
Sahih Muslim, 4.1121)
Spit three times to the left when someone questions who created Allah (ibn Ishaq,
p.270)
So perhaps, Zakir Bhai, MBBS is soon going start suggesting consumption of each
others saliva on same set of arguments and proofs from Hadiths, as he does to sup
port non-vegetarianism! Or maybe selling his saliva along with his books, on sam
e logic that he is using to justify meat here.)

Zakir Bhai, MBBS goes further beyond senses when he starts quoting from Hindu Sc
riptures that they contain permission to eat a variety of meat. He says: There are
many Hindus who are strictly vegetarian. They think it is against their religio
n to consume non-vegetarian food. But the true fact is that the Hindu scriptures
permit a person to have meat. The scriptures mention Hindu sages and saints con
suming non-vegetarian food. He goes on to cite evidences from Hindu Scriptures Ma
nu Smriti and Mahabharat.
(Comment:
1. I do not understand why suddenly Hindu scriptures emerge in a book on Muslims
. Its a common theme in his copy-pasted plagiarized material that in a research on
Hinduism, he would quote more from Quran and Hadiths; and in a research on Islam,
he would quote from Hindu texts!
Perhaps because, being a Qadiyani he believes that Hinduism is the oldest religi
on and Islam is only a revision! But then what about his Wahabi claim?
2. With regards to Manu Smriti, it clearly prohibits meat in 5.51 which says: Tho
se who permit slaying of animals; those who bring animals for slaughter; those w
ho slaughter; those who sell meat; those who purchase meat; those who prepare di
sh out of it; those who serve that meat and those who eat are all murderers.
Its an open fact that almost half of Manu Smriti is either adulterated or misint
erpreted. That is why no Brahmin involved in rituals ever resorts to meat-eating
. If indeed Manu Smriti allowed meat-eating, Brahmins would have been the bigges
t meat-eating class in India! One should refer to Manusmriti by Dr Surendra Kuma
r available from http://www.vedicbooks.com to evaluate this in detail.
3. The Mahabharat evidence is also irrelevant because Mahabharat is not consider
ed an authentic scripture in matters of Dharma in Hinduism. Mahabharat itself st
ates in Shantiparva 265.9.4:
Suraa Matsyaa Pashormaasam Aasavam Krisharoudanam
Dhurtaih Prvartitam Yajne Naitad Vedeshu Vidyate
Avyavasthitamaryaadaeh Vimudhairnaastikaeh Naraeh
Sanshayaatmabhiravyaktaih Hinsaa Samanuvarnitaa
Meaning: Alcohol-drinking, Fish, Meat eating, aasava consumption these are not p
resent in Vedas. These have been propagated by fraud people. They have fraudulen
tly added these uncontrolled, reckless, atheist descriptions in our texts.
Further Mahabharat states Mansaharinah Kuto Daya How can you expect compassion fro
m a meat-eater!
The only authoritative text for Hinduism is The Vedas. So if one has to prove me
at-eating, he has to show it in the Vedas. And for Vedas, refer to http://agnive
er.com/vedas/no-beef-in-vedas/ to see beyond doubt that Vedas severely condemn m
eat-eating.)

In next point, Dr Naik claims that Hindus adopted vegetarianism from Jains!
(Comment:
1. How is this point relevant in a book explaining logic of Muslim practices is
best known to Zakir Bhai, MBBS.
2. Hindus and Jains both have origin from same basic humanistic ideology as pres
ented in Vedas. The traits of Dharma as presented by both is almost similar. Jai
ns are an integrated part of the society that is nowadays called Hindu. Zakir Bh
ai, MBBS attempts to deliberately create differences between them by providing st
atements out of context is utterly deplorable.
3. Or perhaps he is trying to feed his Qadiyani agenda!)

Next he goes on to prove that Plants also have life and that Plants also feel pa
in. He states:
If a person can survive without killing any living creature, I would be the first
person to adopt such a way of life. In the past people thought plants were life
less. Today it is a universal fact that even plants have life. Thus their logic
of not killing living creatures is not fulfilled even by being a pure vegetarian .
There was research done by a farmer in U.S.A. who invented an instrument which c
onverted the cry of the plant so that it could be heard by human beings. He was
able to realize immediately when the plant itself cried for water. Latest resear
ches show that the plants can even feel happy and sad. It can also cry.
(Comment:
1. Look at the source of research of Zakir Bhai, MBBS: a FARMER in USA! No scien
tist, institution, or university, but a farmer best known only to Zakir Bhai MBB
S! What more one needs to see if he is defending or defaming Islam!
2. No such research has ever been conducted, nor it is possible to conduct. Whil
e researches have been done to establish similar electrochemical and biochemical
reactions in plants as in animals, there is nothing to suggest that plants cry
or feel pain. Opinion is divided among theists on whether plants have soul or no
t, but all agree that plants do not feel pain in the manner animals feels.
3. Incidentally, all Muslims are not as fanatic as Zakir Bhai, MBBS would want t
he world to believe. There is a growing population of Islamic vegetarians who in
terpret the Quran to justify vegetarianism. Many among them refuse to consider t
he Quran in current form as final word of Allah and are much progressive. Some e
ven believe that part of Quran is correct and the rest is adulterated or misquot
ed by followers of Prophet Muhammad to present an Islam which is completely agai
nst the true concept of Islam. Some are approaching Vedas to understand original
Dharma. We shall discuss the views of these rational Muslims who submit to reas
on in another article.
But here, let me reproduce reply to Zakir Bhai, MBBS by a leading Muslim vegetar
ians society (http://islamveg.com):
Do Plants Feel Pain?
Some Muslims have been misled by Internet discussions indicating that plants fee
l pain. This argument is used by those who wish to justify their meat consumptio
n by claiming that because both plants and animals feel pain, there is no ethica
l or religious difference between killing plants for food and killing animals fo
r food.
Not Taking Life
One argument begins by explaining that plants have life, presumably just the same
as animals and humans, and thus, this argument claims that one cannot avoid taki
ng life simply by consuming plant foods. The concept of life used in this argume
nt is nebulous and general, and the argument does not make a moral or religious
distinction between the life possessed by plants and that possessed by animals.
One author claims that if it were possible to eat a diet that did not involve ta
king life, he would adopt that diet immediately, but since, according to the aut
hor, a vegetarian diet also takes life, he states that he may as well carry on eat
ing meat. In addition to the lack of clarification about the concept of life and
the lack of distinction between animal life and plant life, the author failed t
o note that a diet that meets his criteria does exist. Many people follow a fruit
arian diet, meaning that they eat fruits, some vegetables that have seeds, and nu
ts. Fruitarian diets do not require the taking of life, as plants produce fruits,
seeds, and nuts so that they can be eaten. The plants neither suffer nor die to
provide these foods. While we do not recommend this diet, it does meet this auth
or s criteria, and if the taking of life really is so important, this is the diet fo
r him.
Supporters of this view of life also claim that since both plants and animals have
life, it is better to take the life of one animal, who might feed 100 people, t
han to take the life of 100 or more plants to feed the same number of people. Th
e fallacy of this argument will be investigated in more detail below.
Plants Inability to Feel Pain
Supporters of this theory also claim that plants feel pain and that one farmer u
sed a device to scientifically catch the sounds of plants crying out and screaming in
pain. They state that our limited range of hearing cannot pick up the screams of p
lants but that machines can.??The truth is that plants, when stressed, release a
chemical called ethylene. This chemical indicates that the plant needs to incre
ase cell growth or take other measures against the perceived stressor. Scientist
s measured levels of ethylene released from stressed plants by listening to them u
sing lasers until a certain frequency was measured.??While this research shows t
hat plants might have a stress-avoidance response, it is quite a stretch to refe
r to this as pain. It is even more erroneous to equate this response with the pain
suffered by animals and human beings. Plants lack nerve endings, brains, hormon
es, and other structures that would allow them to experience pain. They also lac
k the ability to move away from sources of stress, an evolutionary trait linked
with the ability to feel pain.
Even those who argue that plants feel pain and suffer should support a vegetaria
n diet because the number of plants that must be fed to an animal to produce eno
ugh meat for one human is greater than the number of plants required to feed tha
t same human if he or she ate the plants directly. Meat-eaters are responsible f
or killing 10 times more plants than vegetarians, and they also kill and cause suf
fering to animals.??The argument that plants feel pain and suffer and that killi
ng them is as bad as killing animals is weak and illogical. Those who use this a
rgument to justify their continued consumption of meat should attempt to approac
h the debate in a more logical, scientific manner.
Such claims have fooled many well-intentioned Muslims into perpetuating these fa
lsehoods on the Internet. This is harmful to our Ummah, as it makes us appear ig
norant and ill informed.
We ask that all Muslims who have put forward such unfounded claims remove these
claims from their Web sites and other public forums and cease spreading these fi
ctitious claims at conferences and debates. For more information regarding plant
s inability to feel pain, see Peter Singer s Animal Liberation.

Zakir Bhai surges ahead in his mission to defame Islam by stating another peculi
ar reason: If every human being was a vegetarian, it would lead to overpopulation
of cattle in the world, since their reproduction and multiplication is very swi
ft. Allah (swt) in His Divine Wisdom knows how to maintain the balance of His cr
eation appropriately. No wonder He has permitted us to have the meat of the catt
le.
(Comments:
1. By now, one would have no doubts that Zakir Bhai, MBBS is merely cracking jok
es on shoulders of Islam.
2. Despite his claims of MBBS, he seems to have no clues about natural ecologica
l cycles that automatically takes care of overpopulation of certain breeds.
3. Most importantly, he conveniently ignores stating that there is already an ov
erpopulation of cattle due to human demand for meat! Cattle are specifically rea
red for meat consumption who consume 4 times more resources than humans, and are
way above natural limits as per ecological requirements.
4. Either Zakir Bhai, MBBS has given this argument because he did not read the m
aterial that he stole for his book, or he is on a mission to denigrate Islam. Be
cause this again is a big argument in favor of vegetarianism, that meat-eaters c
annot answer.)

He ends up this section with a silly joke: I do not mind if some people are pure
vegetarians. However they should not condemn non-vegetarians as ruthless. In fac
t if all Indians become nonvegetarians then the present non-vegetarians would be
losers since the prices of meat would rise.
(Comment:
One cannot understand what he means by this statement. Is he defending vegetaria
ns or non-vegetarians. The para is quite confusing, but one thing is clear He is
demeaning Islam in any case. Perhaps because being a Qadiyani, his vision of Is
lam is different from the more rational ones among Muslims.)
Zakir Bhai, MBBS missed certain other arguments in favor of vegetarianism namely
:
- environmental conservation in raising vegetarian food compared to animal food
- resource optimization by minimizing food resources used to feed cattle reared
to feed humans
- feeding more people through vegetarian food that can feed at least 10 times mo
re people
- plants can be regrown, animals cannot be
- the number of disease that non-veg foods make one vulnerable to
- etc etc.
You can visit any vegetarian site like ivu.org or PETA or http://www.ethicalvege
tarian.com/arguments.html etc for more on this.
As I emphasized, the purpose of this article was not to get into veg vs non-veg
debate, but show how Zakir Bhai MBBS uses this as a ploy to demean Islam.
I would however like to emphasize that Vedas, where Zakir Bhai sees the source o
f Prophet, strongly condemns any practice that is based on killing innocent crea
tures, degrading environment and wasting valuable resources.

In next part of the article, he addresses the following issue:

ISLAMIC METHOD OF SLAUGHTERING ANIMALS APPEARS RUTHLESS (Page 22)
He explains the method and then provides following set of ridiculous arguments t
o justify it:
a. It is more hygienic
b. It keeps meat fresh for longer time
c. Animals do not feel pain
(Comments:
Instead of putting my personal views, I would like to share that it is the progr
essive Muslims of today who are demanding ban on meat and especially the form of
Halal meat that Zakir Bhai is recommending. They have provided ample material t
o prove that this is an extremely loathsome method in current context and goes a
gainst teachings of original Quran of Prophet Muhammad (and not Zakir Bhai).
They deplore the fact that fake people like Dr Zakir Naik are claiming to be sol
e representatives of Islam and presenting a distorted Islam to world that makes
lives of an average educated Muslim miserable.
Here are certain points from http://www.islamveg.com/halalmeat.asp which is dedi
cated to promoting Vegetarian Islam.
1. They quote from New Scientist, the premiere research journal on how Animals F
eel the Pain of Muslim Slaughter: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17972-an
imals-feel-the-pain-of-religious-slaughter.html?full=true&print=true
2. They provide several reasons why so-called Halal meat is not actually Halal.
3. They claim that Vegetarian foods and ingredients, not counting alcohol, are ha
lal by nature. Eating vegetarian is the best and easiest way to ensure that you
are keeping halal.
I hope the Muslims misled by like of Zakir Bhai MBBS, would reject the fake Qadi
yani, and embrace the rational approach of Vedas as welcomes by progressive Musl
ims. In Vedic approach, one does not kill innocent animals for taste-buds and he
nce the question of slaughter does not arise in first place.)
-
The next topic he takes is
NON-VEGETARIAN FOOD MAKES MUSLIMS VIOLENT (Page 23)
Question:
Science tell us that whatever one eats, it has an effect on one s behaviour. Why t
hen, does Islam allow Muslims to eat non-vegetarian food, since eating of animal
s could make a person violent and ferocious?
Answer:
1. Only eating of herbivorous animals allowed I agree that, what a person eats h
as an effect on his behaviour. This is one of the reasons why Islam prohibits th
e eating of carnivorous animals like lion, tiger, leopard, etc. who are violent
and ferocious. The consumption of the meat of such animals would probably make a
person violent and ferocious. Islam only allows the eating of herbivorous anima
ls like cow, goat, sheep, etc. that are peaceful and docile. Muslims eat peacefu
l and docile animals because Muslims are peace loving and non-violent people.
He then goes on to quote from Quran and Hadiths on the kind of meat that is hara
m and halal based on whether the animal is peaceful or violent.
(Comment:
1. Nothing could be more obvious can this concluding part of the topic of food,
on true motives of Zakir Bhai, MBBS. He is simply writing all this to ridicule I
slam on pretext of Veg-non-veg debate!
2. Let us analyze: First he admits that food has an impact on one s behavior.
Next, he says that Muslims are peaceful because they eat peaceful animals. By th
is logic, why are not carnivorous animals also considered peaceful? After all a
carnivorous animal like lion, tiger or leopard also eats docile animals like Mus
lims. So either one considers lion, tiger etc also to be peaceful like Muslims o
r should consider Muslims to be violent and ferocious like carnivorous animals.
3. And if we consider carnivorous animals to be peaceful because they eat same f
ood as Muslims, then Quran should not prohibit eating of carnivorous animals als
o. Because it is hence proved that even carnivorous animals are peaceful and Mus
lims are permitted to eat peaceful animals!
4. Going further, even eating of peaceful humans should be justified because eat
ing peaceful humans will make one loving and non-violent!
5. Zakir Bhai is perhaps creating grounds for defense of terrorists who kill inn
ocent people. He would thus argue in court, These terrorists are peace loving and
non-violent people because they kill peaceful and docile people! )
-
Muslims, especially followers of Zakir Bhai, MBBS should introspect and decide i
f they can afford to allow fake scholars like him to continue to be representati
ve of Islam. If yes, Muslims are bound to face ridicule and humiliation. If not,
they should promote more progressive Muslim movements, who evaluate Islam more
rationally.
I was happy to listen to Abdullah Tariq, eminent Muslim scholar from Rampur who
admits that true Islam is based on foundation of Vedas. I would welcome the rati
onal and peace-loving Muslims to take this progress further and return back to t
he roots of Vedas, their original source.

Why Muslims hate Zakir Naik so much?

Zakir Bhai MBBS aka Dr Zakir Naik has been among the most hated public figures o
f today. Deoband recently issued a fatwa against him. There is no doubt that Zak
ir Bhai is among the most smartly marketed religious celebrity of last few years
. He claims to represent and propagate Islam. He considers himself a servant of
Muhammad (pbuh). Yet it is the Muslims and Islamic clerics who hate Zakir Naik t
he most. (Why Muslims Hate Zakir Naik). In this post, I shall briefly list out r
easons why Muslims hate Zakir Naik so much that many claim that he would be the
first person to enter Dozakh (refer We Hate Zakir Naik )
Let me provide a brief background. Most people consider Islam to be the religion
propagated by Prophet Muhammad and narrated in Quran. On surface it appears all
so simple. Quran proclaims that one who submits to the word of final messenger
of Allah shall achieve Heaven. But things are not so simple for a layman, and ev
en a scholar. Because while there is only one Quran and one Prophet Muhammad, th
ere is tremendous variety in the types of interpretations that so-called Muslims
make out of this book and this great social-reformer.
In short, Islam is not as monolithic as it appears to be. The number of sects in
Islam are more than 72 and they are as different from each other as dry is from
wet and cold is from hot. All these sects have different customs, different lev
els of tolerances for non-Muslims, different food habits, different interpretati
ons of Quran, different level of importance given to Muhammad and his associates
and different descriptions of Heaven and Hell. The Shia-Sunni war is clearly kn
own.
What makes the things even more confusing is the belief that of these 72+ sects
only one is on path of truth and hence only one will go to Heaven. Rest go to He
ll. Thus it is not sufficient to just be a Muslim to achieve Heaven, you need to
follow only the right sect. Now each sect fights to prove that they are the gen
uine sect. Some sects are liberal enough to allow even non-Muslims to Heaven. So
me Muslims are even promoters of vegetarianism. Some consider nation ahead of ev
erything else. But there are some who believe that all except those who fully be
lieve in their sect and its practices without questioning anything, alone will g
o to Heaven. Rest of all will be in Hell forever.
Among the most fanatic of these cults is the Wahabi cult. This is supposed to be
the producer of largest number of terrorists including Osama and Al Qaeda since
its inception in 18th century and has been a cause of disgrace for rest of the
peace-loving Muslims. Dr Zakir Naik belongs to this Wahabi cult, believes that o
nly this Wahabi version of Islam can bring anyone close to Heaven, and rest of a
ll will go to Hell. And things are not as simple. Further, he mixes his Wahabism
with material from other scholars of different sects to create his own Zakirism
, that in the process blatantly insults and disgraces the vision of Islam as per
other sects, including the more tolerant ones. His Zakirism goes to such extent
that he does not even spare Wahabis from humiliations. Let us see how:
a. Zakir Bhai MBBS claims to be an expert of comparative religions. In his site,
he has put lots of articles on comparative religions under his name. But in rea
lity, they are merely word to word copy of texts from Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya sources
. So what is wrong if one refers to Qadiyani or Ahmadiyya sources? Perhaps nothi
ng, except that:
- Qadiyanis/ Ahmadiyyas are considered Kafirs and are prosecuted by most Muslims
for their radical beliefs.
- Wahabis have been greatest enemies of Qadiyanis
- The content of the Qadiyani writings that Zakir Bhai MBBS has swindled under h
is own name are blatantly against core beliefs of rest of the Muslims including
Wahabis. For example, Zakir Bhai MBBS tries to prove that Vedas prophecize about
Muhammad. (This has been completely refuted in a three-part expose starting wit
h this article)
Now this belief gels with the Qadiyani belief that Vedas were also revelations.
But Wahabis and other sects refuse to believe so. Hence even Zakir Bhai MBBS wri
tes in another article that he is not sure if Vedas are revelations. He convenie
ntly forgets that he himself has proved that Vedas reveal Muhammad in another ar
ticle! (Perhaps because he forgot to read it before asking his henchmen to copy
from Qadiyani book and paste under his name in his site and books)
In summary, Zakir Bhai continues to use Qadiyani source to show his scholarly ca
pabilities but refuses to accept Qadiyanis because he claims to be Wahabi and is
funded by Wahabi militants.Or is he a Qadiyani spy in Wahabi disguise? Only Zak
ir Bhai knows the reality, but his acts suffice to invite hatred of Qadiyanis as
well as other Muslim sects.
b. Zakir Bhai justifies non-vegetarianism as a scientific Islamic trait. While h
e does acknowledge that even a Muslim can be vegetarian, he attempts to justify
meat-eating on crazy arguments including research by some farmers. (read the reb
uttal here: (Zakir Bhai defends Halal meat). This catches ire of several progres
sive Muslims who refuse to believe that meat-eating has any association with rel
igion. Many progressive Muslims have even started a Muslim Vegetarian Society th
at is among the most powerful protagonists of Vegetarianism and opponents of Hal
al meat. They have severely condemned Zakir Naik and his spurious research for d
isgracing Islam to justify the lust of his own tongue. (You can visit their site
at http://www.islamveg.com/halalmeat.asp)
c. Being a Wahabi he has a soft corner for Osama Bin Laden. When someone questio
ned him on his views on Osama, he replied that he admires him because he has ter
rorized America! He shied away from criticizing terrorist activities of Osama. T
his created a lot of furore among Muslims and Deoband even issued a fatwa agains
t Zakir Bhai for his tacit support for Osama Bin Laden. (Deobandi Fatwa against
Zakir Bhai) Reasons are obvious -- the money that funds Osama and money that fun
ds Zakir Bhai have allegedly the same sources.Many terrorists caught in past few
years have admitted that they were inspired by rhetoric of Zakir Bhai MBBS.
d. While on surface he claims to be a conservative Muslim, he wears a non-Islami
c dress which has per Islamic hadiths would lead one to be treated as a non-Musl
im during Judgment Day. Many devout Muslims thus consider their dress very serio
usly and hate Dr Zakir Naik for setting wrong examples by wearing Kafir dress of
tie, suit and coat.
e. Wahabis have destroyed many Sufi shrines and even house of Prophet Muhammad b
ecause they believe these to be signs of idol worship. They killed many Muslim m
en, women and children in their campaigns to destroy tombs and holy places. (Ref
er wikipedia on Wahabism) In the same footsteps, Zakir Naik severely condemns th
ese practices to be anti-muslim and hence is hated by those who worship graves,
Sufis and tombs.
Watch this:
f. Shias obviously have a reason to hate Zakir Bhai MBBS because of his staunch
anti-Shia stance, being a Wahabi. But his admiration of Yazeed, considered to be
culprit for massacre of Karbala has been a strong point of contention for other
Muslims. So much is the hatred against Yazeed that many curse by name of Yazeed
.
g. Zakir justifies the ban on worship of other religions in Muslim countries. He
however also justifies that Muslims should be allowed in other countries to pro
mote their religion. The logic is curious -- as per Zakir Bhai, in matters of re
ligion, Muslims are the best. So they should be allowed everywhere -- Muslim or
non-Muslim countries. But non-Muslims should not be allowed to build places of w
orship in Muslim countries because their religions are inferior to Islam! Watch
this video.
Such ultra-fanaticism irks the more progressive Muslims who want to integrate wi
th rest of the world and rise above religious dogmas and hatred.
h. Being an ultra-conservative he propagates that despite a person being as much
good or noble, unless he unconditionally accepts his version of Islam, he will
go to Hell and Hell alone and forever. This goes against beliefs of more progres
sive Muslims who believe that all who act with genuineness, regardless of their
religion will go to Heaven and not Hell.
i. Muslim women obviously have all the reasons to hate Zakir Bhai because in nam
e of pseudo-science he is simply restricting their freedom that has been ordaine
d by the Creator. For example, he states that Muslim women should always wear Hi
jab and Burqa and cover their entire body always. Medical researchers are worrie
d that such unreasonable practices cause dreaded diseases due to lack of Vitamin
D in Muslim countries which enforce such beliefs on women. More liberal Muslims
see such insistence as dangerous dogma harming the cause of Muslims and Human R
ights.
He further states that Muslim women should not work in offices because they may
have chance to be alone with men even for a second. The only men that a woman is
allowed to be alone with are her husband and those who have suckled her. Taking
this crazy dogma of Zakir Bhai further, the Head of Hadith Department of the mo
st reputed university of Islam in world recently issued a fatwa that Muslim wome
n should allow their male colleagues to suckle them five times. This will allow
them to work with these men, even when alone!
Zakir Bhai debars women from being any doctor except gynecologists because that
is haram as per his version of Islam. Women should not take part in sports as we
ll!
He further defends polygamy by furnishing false data on population but disallows
polyandry.(Read this expose on his views on polygamy)
He justifies the belief that women are less intelligent than men and hence evide
nce of two women equal that of one man! He thus also justifies that women cannot
inherit equal to their male counterparts!
No wonder, he would agree to dogma that to prove a rape, a woman should bring am
ple number of witnesses who have witnessed actual penetration!
The list can go on and on. So much that now even Wahabis have started calling Za
kir Bhai a Shaitan. Read this.
And other sects who do not receive as much funding as Osama or Zakir Bhai try to
oth and nail to debunk his fraud through all means. Watch http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=VeV5F8fte14
The process of seeking truth demands process of elimination. One may not be sure
and continue to debate on which of the 72 or more sects of Islam would lead one
to Heaven, or whether Quran itself is the authentic Quran and not the new Quran
as created recently. One may not be sure whether a permanent Hell or Heaven, or
Fairshtas or Jinnas exist in first place. One may doubt if Muhammad was a great
non-divine social -reformer or actually a Messenger of Allah s word. One can deba
te if Quran deserves to be final word of Allah and what should be its interpreta
tion or what new good thing Quran provides which was not there in previous books
.
But one fact is sure, there is not even a scope for debate, and certain persons
should be out-rightly banished to Hell or hell-like place for benefit of rest of
 the civilized peaceful society. They include
- people who dare not condemn terrorists like Osama
- who consider that all except their sect will burn in permanent Hell despite ho
w-so-much good they do in their lives
- who cannot tolerate others but want themselves to be tolerated everywhere
- who believe that women are inferior or bereft of intelligence
- who justify inferior rights and curtailment of freedom for women
- who refuse to change their stands despite presence of factual information prov
ing the opposite
- who do not clear their stand and purely use material prepared by someone else
to claim scholar status for self and yet condemn the source
Such terrorism sympathizers are threat for any civilized society. Progressive an
d even conservative Muslims have showed the right way by criticizing Zakir Naik
so severely. The first and foremost religion of humans is humanity. The way nobl
e-minded Muslims have shown courage and mettle to condemn the dangerous frauds o
f Zakir Bhai that are detrimental to entire humanity is warmly welcomed. Such st
eps in right direction pave way for right direction for seekers of true knowledg
e.

Why is Zakir Naik so scared?

His fans hail him as the next big thing to come after Muhammad. To them, if one
has to understand Islam and Muhammad, it has to be through Zakir Naik. Just as M
uhammad is claimed to be messenger of Allah, Zakir seems to be the new messenger
of Muhammad. And anyone browsing internet can come through ample number of zeal
ots who attempt to be the messenger of the messenger of the messenger of Allah.
Its a different matter though that some Muslim clergies issued a fatwa that publ
icity of Islam through internet is haram !
Ever since I wrote first few articles exposing the fraud of Zakir Naik and level
of his medical expertise, I have been getting hate mails and hate comments. I k
now that I am destined for permanent Hell for proving that the messenger of mess
enger of Allah aka Zakir Naik should have his hands chopped off as per Islamic s
hariat. (Refer my article http:/agniveer.com/naikexposed)
But before the messengers of this new messenger of the messenger of Allah (I adm
it its sounding confusing!) decide to send me to Hell, as per Quran 2.191, 9.123
, 9.5, 66.9, 47.4 etc etc, as interpreted by Zakir Naik and his beloved Osama Bi
n Laden, I would like to present a summary chronology of events till date:
1.
It is not that I got a bout of epilepsy one night and an angel revealed to me th
at I should start questioning methods and designs of Zakir Naik. The articles wr
itten by me are milestones of a process that started much before and that would
continue until I am sent to Hell as per verses mentioned above, or the foolish c
oncept of such a Hell and Heaven and their promoters aka Osama Bin Laden, see th
eir doomsday.
In 2004, at height of his popularity among semi-literate fanatic Muslims, he sen
t a mail to Sri Mahendra Pal Arya, a leading member of our team with a photo of
himself holding Quran in front and Vedas in back. Sri Mahendra Pal replied back
inviting him for a debate on how Quran is considered superior to Vedas by Zakir
Naik.
Since then Zakir Naik has been extremely elusive. We have been trying to contact
IRF through mail and phone, but they refuse to accept the invitation.
2.
In 2006, again a detailed letter was written to Zakir Naik questioning his fraud
ulent negative publicity of Vedas and other Hindu texts. He ignored as usual.
3.
On 27 March, 2007, we organized a debate between Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya and Ta
riq Murtaza, a professor of Aligarh Muslim University and a core member of Zakir
Naik s team. The debate was recorded on video as well. When Tariq Murtaza was for
ced to turn speechless, he gave lame excuses for the same. He then suggested tha
t his teacher, Abdullah Tariq of Rampur would be able to debate better.
Now this gentleman Abdullah Tariq is another right-hand of Zakir Naik and suppos
ed to be the expert on comparative religions. His Taqiah belief (search on googl
e to discover yourself what is Taqiah) is that Vedas are first message of Allah
and Quran the final one. So all should go by the latest edition of His message.
4.
On 8 February, 2008, after a tiresome management of logistics, considering the b
usy schedule of both Mahendra Pal Arya and Abdullah Tariq (both are involved in
conversion activities primarily and hence keep traveling), we could finally sche
dule a public debate in Bulandshahar, UP. Abdullah Tariq, very confident about h
is conversion and conversation skills, claimed in very beginning that he would b
e willing to come each day to explain about Quran if he gets such a crowd to hea
r. But as the debate progressed, one could see droplets of sweat on forehead of
Abdullah Tariq. By the time debate was over, he had to cry foul that Mahendra Pa
l Arya deviated from core topic. The debate ended on a peaceful note though and
Abdullah Tariq reiterated his willingness to come for discussions again and agai
n.
5.
That was the last we saw of Abdullah Tariq. Meanwhile we continued our efforts t
o contact Zakir Naik directly and invite him for a debate. But Islamic Research
Foundation (IRF) would simply not respond. Sometime in mid of 2008, we uploaded
videos of Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya on youtube. You can check them at http://yout
ube.com/truthwisdom2008. The quality is bit dismal because it is difficult to ge
t funds for such activities from Hindus who are more busy wasting time and money
on lavish yajnas, constructions, festivals and costly idols. But that did creat
e an impact. We started getting hate mails and abuses, and also voices of suppor
t. Many disciples of Zakir Naik came to intermediate and stated that we have nev
er ever issued an invitation for debate in first place. IRF also denied having r
eceived any such invitation from any person ever.
AUM or OM is considered by the Arya Samaj to b...
Image via Wikipedia
6.
Meanwhile two fanatics filed a petition in Court to put a ban on Satyarth Prakas
h, the book by Swami Dayanand Saraswati that is severely critical of the neo-Isl
amic beliefs. It was a matter of surprise that our secular court admitted such a
petition in first place. And while rest of the Samaj was busy holding protest r
allies and holding press conferences, we filed a counter-petition in High Court
challenging the authority of lower court to even take up this case. We presented
a detailed petition highlighting importance of Satyarth Prakash and how the poi
nts made in this book regarding Islam are authentic and without malice. High Cou
rt had to use its special powers to bring the case to High Court for hearing. In
second hearing, the Court dismissed the case warning the petitioners to not fil
e such frivolous cases in future.
This added to our notorious fame in eyes of the Zakir cohort.
7.
Many ignorant disciples of Zakir Naik, unaware of our previous invitations, clai
med that if we ever come to face Zakir Naik, we would be crushed like anything.
Others said that Zakir Naik is too big a personality to accept challenges from e
very Tom, Dick and Harry.
We humbly admitted to the size of our erstwhile personality and to check out how
that crushing might appear, we issued another invitation in November 2008 on be
half of Sarvadeshik Arya Pratinidhi Sabha the apex body of Arya Samaj. You can rev
iew a copy of the invitation letter at http://www.scribd.com/doc/8142696/Officia
l-Challenge-to-Dr-Zakir-Naik-by-Sarvdeshik-Arya-Pratinidhi-Sabha-
8.
There was an even greater silence from Zakir team after this. Because now, even
Abdullah Tariq and Tariq Murtaza refused to come forward for another round of pu
blic discussions. They have now a standard stand - If you want to discuss somethi
ng, let us meet close doors and personally. We shall not discuss these things in
public.
Our team members spent most of 2009 debating select groups of Muslims, neo-conve
rts and old timers. We held many face to face debates, debates on phone with th
eir prominent leaders and then on internet forums. This was when we realized how
strong their network is. They have even priests of temples in their gang. In we
stern UP, we became quite popular in this circle. We thus received huge number o
f dawats (invitations) to embrace Islam which we countered with our dawats to c
ome back home to Vedic Dharma.
Many did indeed accept and 2009 was a fruitful year in terms of success of our S
huddhi (purification) movement to bring our family members back home. We also co
ntinued our debates on Zakir Naik and his tactics on internet forums like orkut
and facebook.
No surprise that we had turned even more notoriously popular in their circle by
now.
Osama bin Laden
Image via Wikipedia
9.
Then sometime in July or August of 2009, Abdullah Tariq addressed Peace TV and d
eclared that in 5 years, they would make India an Islamic State. This was the la
st straw to break everything. We replied him back with a counter-challenge that
in 5 years, truth-seeking Muslims would escape from their grips of falsehood lik
e sand.
In August 2009, we sent another invitation to IRF to come up for a debate on beh
alf of Paropkarini Sabha the apex intellectual body of Arya Samaj and caretaker
of original Satyarth Prakash. We expected to receive no response as usual. So th
is time, we posted the invitation all across the web and email lists. You can vi
ew that simply by searching for zakir naik paropkarini sabha on google.
We also called them up and we came to know that Zakir Naik is busy in Dubai. Aft
er lot of efforts, we finally got a response from IRF asking us about what is th
e strength of crowd that we can pull. I have attached this letter with this arti
cle as a pdf along with my reply.
In my reply, I invited IRF experts to be present at Rishi Mela between October 2
3 and October 25, 2009 where thousands of people and famed personalities are exp
ected to be present.
10.
That was the last ever communication we could make with IRF. Meanwhile the blabb
ering of Zakir Naik continued and I could see his messengers simply copy-pasting
his writings to sway non-Muslims. We were thus left with no recourse but to pre
pare rebuttals to Zakir Naik s demagoguery so as to prevent both Muslims and non-M
uslims to fall in trap and develop completely wrong notions about Islam and Hind
uism.
Ever since then, Abdullah Tariq has even refused to take calls if they come from
our phones. IRF is dead silent as usual. But the covert activities are going in
 full pace.
Its obvious that Zakir Naik does not want to debate us publicly. At best, he wou
ld allow outsiders to ask a question to which he could reply by a one-liner and
have his followers clap to their heart s content. Or he would deliberately choose
debaters who he knows are not trained in his covert methods.
He refused written debate with Al Sina because written debates expose everything
. He knows that his Qadiyani source of plagiarism is already exposed. And he kno
ws that Arya Samaj has been a thorn in eyes of Muslim evangelists for last 125 y
ears. He knows that this group is thoroughly well-versed with Quran, his ways an
d the blatant loopholes. He knows that to give a stage show among semi-literate
blind followers scared of Hell is not same as debating with those whose history
lies in Shuddhi movement.
Yes, Zakir may have access to petrodollars and funds sourcing Osama Bin Laden. Y
es, another bomb blasted in Pune killing innocents. True that Osama brand of ter
rorism ably supported by Zakir Naik continues. But Aurangzeb was scared of Shiva
ji despite his massive army and Ravan was scared of Ram despite he being Lankesh
. After all, truth is more powerful than the strongest weapon.

Zakir Naik refuses to debate Arya Samaj

Abdullah Tariq, the guru of Zakir Naik on matters of comparative religions had a
debate with Mahendra Pal Arya, an Arya Samaj scholar in Bulandshahar on Februar
y 8, 2008. While he was extremely eager to spend days after days to explain the
various concepts about Islam, things changed immediately after the debate. Now h
e refuses to have even a dialogue publicly. He suggests that he would discuss on
ly in complete privacy.
Why this happened would be obvious after going through the debate that happened.
It has been uploaded on Youtube and can be viewed by clicking here.
As you all know, we have been pursuing Zakir Naik for a public debate for severa
l years now. You can review the details on Why Zakir Naik is so scared?
We gave him several offers, agreeing to accommodate his schedule at any location
and even invited him for Rishi Mela in Ajmer. First he kept ignoring, then we g
ot mails from IRF seeking further details and now the secretary of Zakir Naik ha
s categorically stated that Zakir Naik will not debate with Arya Samaj, so we sh
ould not pursue him any further.
The reasons are pretty obvious.
Zakir Naik knows that Arya Samaj has been defending Hinduism and exposing Islami
c designs for last 125 years and that has been instrumental in shaping some sign
ificant directions of our history. For example the Shuddhi movement, adoption of
Devanagari Hindi as national language, breakdown of Nizam of Hyderabad etc etc.
He knows that while he can fool semi-literate Muslim youth and enslave fake Sha
nkaracharyas and fake Arya Samaj presidents, tackling a true Arya Samaji would b
e too much for him.
But now that he has refused to debate, we have also taken certain resolutions:
a. We would also not debate with common Muslims apart from scholars of level of
Zakir Naik or those whose photos are published in website of Islamic Research Fo
undation (IRF). These common Muslims are merely being guinea pigs in hands of fa
natics like Zakir Naik and we have full sympathy with them. We do not want to hu
rt their sentiments and would request them to refer any doubts with their expert
s and scholars, because our writings are primarily based on Islamic texts themse
lves. And if they want further discussions, kindly provide us details of their s
cholars s qualifications who would like to debate us.
This is exactly what Zakir Naik also demands, so we are not being unfair. We are
simply being equal and just. In fact while he has categorically refused to deba
te us, we still look forward to debates.
People can still debate each other through forum and comments features on the si
te, but they should not expect response from Agniveer henceforth unless we feel
that the person has sufficient calibre/ competence. This again is as per Zakir N
aik s policy.
b. Now our mission is to equip an average citizen of Bharat with sufficient ammu
nitions in form of arguments and facts, that he or she alone is able to tackle s
uch misleading propagation by frauds like Zakir Naik.
c. It was announced in Peace TV in 2009 that in next 5 years, they would make In
dia Darul Islam. Accordingly the conversion activities and propagation of distor
ted facts about Hinduism has intensified. We are aware of such designs in variou
s parts of the country. We have also accepted the challenge and would put our ut
most efforts to spoil any evil design to damage the culture of Ram and Krishna.
d. Our objective is not to hurt anyone s sentiments or denigrate anyone s belief sys
tem. Our objective is merely to defend and propagate truth and expose whatever i
s false. So if someone feels we are guilty of spreading hatred, we are only as m
uch guilty as Galileo or Copernicus who questioned the false beliefs of Church.
e. We have deepest love for all human beings. If we criticize Islam, it is only
out of compassion for our Muslim brothers and sisters. Our arguments are purely
based on facts and logic, and we are completely against use of any violent or de
ceitful means of influencing anyone. So while we severely condemn the violent me
ans in which Islam was spread in Indian subcontinent, we also do not want to ave
nge it through violent means.
f. We consider our Muslim brothers and sisters to share the same ancestry as us.
So there is no way we can think of harming them. But to provide them with true
perspectives of their true Dharma and the false trap in which they have fallen i
s our highest Dharma, because it has strong impact on future of humanity.
g. We believe in Freedom of Belief. So while we provide strongest reasons and fa
cts to Muslims to switch back to the original Dharma, we respect their freedom o
f belief and are against use of any illegal, violent, threatening or unethical m
eans to convince them. Our motto is Satyameva Jayate.
h. We understand that Zakir Naik is merely a stooge and what lies hidden behind
him is the whole cartel of sinister designs. We say so because many terrorists s
wear in name of Zakir Naik, and Zakir Naik openly defends Osama and states that
all non-Muslims will burn in hell forever. Thus our enmity is not against Zakir
Naik or his followers. Our enmity is against those forces who promote terrorism,
non-tolerance and blind faiths through threat of Hell.
We shall continue to keep exposing all that is false, not only in modern Islam o
f Zakir Naik, but also in other dogmas in time to come.
And hope that truth shall prevail, with peace, unity and brotherhood!
Zakir Naik Islam: The fastest growing religion?

Islam is claimed to be the fastest growing religion by the new prophet of Islam
Dr Zakir Naik and his followers. Large section of people inspired by the new mes
senger can be seen indulged in debating others over the issue of fastest rate of
growth of Islam. Interestingly, on one hand, Mullahs in countries like India ar
e assuring the people of other faiths about trueness of Islam through their own
census, on the other hand, in Muslim countries like Pakistan, Afganistan, Iraq,
etc, holy warriors are killing their fellow Muslims for not being true Muslims!
But, one thing, which makes Islam different from others, is the spectrum of its
preachers starting from Mullahs proving Islam through peaceful speeches to Osama
s and Kasabs, who implement the peaceful teachings of Islam through their peacef
ul actions! That s apart, today, we shall analyze the claims of muslims about Isla
m to be the fastest growing religion.
We will pick one by one the claims of Muslims on why Islam is from God, which we
have come across quite often, and will scrutinize those in two ways. Comment a be
low every claim will examine it by assuming the claim to be true. Comment b will c
ontain the reality of the claim, whether it is right or wrong.
Islam is best and the only religion from God because
Claim 1: it has the following of over 1.5 billion and in few years, Islam will b
ecome no. 1 surpassing Christianity.
(a).
(i) Still the majority is with Christians! If number is the criterion of being b
est, Christianity is better than Islam. Moreover, we can generalize this logic a
nd say that, since non muslims are 5.5 billions (almost 4 times the muslims), no
n muslims are better and hence Islam is not from God!
(ii) According to Zakir Naik, sinners in the world are increasing. Readers can w
atch one of his videos answering a question about reincarnation. This is evident
from the deeds of people as well. Everyone can see the moral values going down.
People have become more selfish and they are no longer ardent devotees of God,
as they happened to be in the past. People are not as truthful as the people of
past era used to be. So, the number logic says that lies, selfishness, immoralit
y, and atheism are from God as they are practiced the most! Also, sins and Islam
both are increasing simultaneously as per Zakir Naik. So, if one is from God be
cause it is increasing, other would also be from God by the same logic. Wise wil
l conclude the rest!
(iii) What about the time when Muhammad started preaching his philosophy? His re
ligion was neither in majority nor was its rate higher. Should not then Islam au
tomatically fails to qualify the majority/highest rate test at least in past?
(iv) Just like Islam today is claimed to have high growth rate, idolatry was at
boom some few thousand years ago. Isn t then idolatry from God? And everything, wh
ich either was/is in majority or had/has highest growth rate should be from God
by this logic!
(v) Since number is so important for Muslims, then, is it not strange that they
believe in just One God and one prophet? Why are not polytheists better than Mus
lims since they believe in more Gods? Or is it that number logic works opposite
here? Can anyone enlighten us, in which case this number logic works, in which,
it gets reversed, and in which it does not work at all?
(b). Islam will become number one for sure in terms of population. But the reaso
n behind this is not the people converting to Islam but higher number of babies
muslims produce. It is evident from the fact that muslim countries have highest
growth rates, which is the result of high birth rates rather than any conversion
, since all are already muslims there with nobody to convert.
Claim 2: more and more people are coming to Islam
(a).
(i) Logic of majority/high growth rate has been examined above.
(ii) Islam is the comfort zone for the people fond of lust. Thus people with low
er character accept this opportunity to enjoy 72 virgins forever. This is the ma
in reason behind most of the conversions to Islam. Moreover, Islam provides comp
lete package of 4 wives and innumerable concubines to the males in this world it
self. This makes Islam favorite for many, who are in search of moral justificati
on to have extra marital relationships!
(iii) It s true that more and more people are accepting Islam but at the same time
, many are leaving it too. If accepting Islam by people is seen as truthfulness
of it, why not leaving Islam by many people is a proof of its falsehood?
(b). Zakir Naik says that don t judge a car by its driver. Thus we should look dow
n to Islamic scriptures to know Islam and not see what the people say or do. One
will be called as a muslim only when he does Fard (duty) as per Quran and Hadit
h.
(i) Today, most of the muslims of Indian sub continent (I am not sure about othe
r muslim countries) worship graves. Nijamuddin Auliya in Delhi, Moinuddin Chisht
i in Ajmer, Haji Ali in Mumbai, and many others like these are visited by muslim
s in huge numbers, making these the largest gatherings of muslims anywhere in th
e world after Hajj. But according to Quran, grave worship is Shirk and Shirk is
the only sin, which will not be forgiven! Thus most of the people, who think the
y are muslims but actually they are not, will go to hell!
(ii) Praying 5 times a day and fasting in the month of Ramdan is also the duty o
f a muslim. Can Zakir Bhai tell us how many of so called muslims are actual musl
ims as per the above condition?
(iii) Many hadith say that a muslims should not dress like Kafirs. Many places,
it is written that a man s dress should not hang beneath the ankle. If it is, the
man will not be entertained by Allah on the day of resurrection! And interesting
ly, modern day prophet of many muslims, Zakir himself dresses like Kafirs (wear
s suit and tie), which has been called Haram by Muhammad!
(iv) Muhammad ordered muslims to grow beard. But today, we see hardly any muslim
except Madarsa bred Mullahs having beard.
In short, it can be concluded from the above points that a muslim is the one, wh
o does not do grave worship, does offer prayers five times a day, fasts for whol
e month of Ramdan, does not wear cloths like Kafirs i.e. pants, shirts, suit, ti
e etc, does not wear garment which hangs beneath the ankle, has beard as per Isl
amic norms etc etc. And the one, fails to do any one of the above, will burn in
hell forever!
There would hardly be few million people, who actually follow the above norms. I
f this is the case, Islam is actually the fastest declining religion today and h
as least number of followers among all religions!
Claim 3: Quran is the most read book of its time
(a). This is yet another logic which many muslims used to give. Again, by this l
ogic, Quran cannot be said as word of God because it was not read as much as oth
er books like Vedas used to be in the past. And today, books like Harry Potter,
five point someone etc are read by crores of people, which by number logic, shou
ld be from God! One can ask that we are discussing religious scriptures and not
the fantasy books or novels and hence Quran cannot be compared with these books.
But, we should remember that Quran too is full of the stories of angels, Jinns,
Satan, flying donkey, splitting of moon, birth of a baby without father, weepin
g of trees, stones talking to man, sky as roof supported by invisible pillars, s
even skies, heaven, hell, pre decided fates etc. So, for a sensible person, ther
e is hardly any difference between Quran and the stories of Ali Baba Chalis Chor
! We have categorically analyzed Quran in our previous articles and we have show
n that why cannot Quran be from God. Readers are requested to go through the art
icles listed under the section analysis of Islam in our site.
(b). Indeed, Quran is the most read book in the name of religion, but it is the
most hated book of its time as well! So, it cannot be from God since its haters
are more than its lovers.
Claim 4: Quran is the only text on the face of the earth, which is free from any
tampering
(a). By this logic, every article on this site is from God, since no tampering w
hatsoever has been done in those!
(b). Actually, this claim of muslims regarding perfectness of Quran is a hoax. T
here is a dispute among muslim scholars regarding the exact number of verses in
Quran. Everyone knows that Shia muslims consider this current Quran to be incomp
lete and they believe in a Quran, which they say original, which is comprised of
17000 verses, but is not available today. In other sects of Islam, some people
estimate about 6236 verses, some say 6349, some even claim 6666! Many even say t
hat some verses were from Satan instead of Allah! After this much of contraventi
on, how can one claim Quran to be free from any interpolation? Moreover, current
Quran was compiled much later after the death of Muhammad by his followers, who
were fighting each other to spread the message of religion of peace!. In these
circumstances, who can believe in the claims of Quran to be unchanged from its b
eginning?
Claim 5: many hindu Shankaracharyas like Shankaracharya of Banaras has openly a
nnounced Muhammad to be the last prophet and Quran to be the final word for whol
e humanity.
(a).
(i) First of all, we would like to know, can a hindu Shankaracharya, who is a Ka
fir and believes in idol worship, become source of inspiration for muslims to be
lieve in Islam? If that be so, why not idol worship be accepted by muslims as ho
ly work since Shankaracharya does it?
(ii) Bringing a hindu preacher in an Islamic gathering is itself against the doc
trines of Islam. So, the muslims including Zakir Naik should do Tauba for commit
ting this sin. Since muslims are not to believe in the words of Kafir, Shankarac
harya should not be taken seriously in the matters of Deen! Hence Islam is not f
rom God.
(b). There is no Shankar Math and hence no Shankaracharya in Banaras by the way!
Claim 6: many famous scientists have embraced Islam.

(a). All the scientists were/are non muslims. Thus, if scientists are to be foll
owed, Islam is not from God!
(b). The fame of those famous scientists is yet to reach non muslims and intelle
ctuals! We are trying to contact IRF regarding these famous (?) scientists but h
ave got no response.
Claim 7: Islam is being accepted by many people in west. Number of women convert
ing to Islam is higher than men. This is the biggest proof that Islam gives high
est respect to women.
(a). People of west do many more things like drinking, open sex, multiple partne
rs for both man and woman etc. Do muslims accept these deeds also right? If not,
how can the decision of such people accepting Islam be said right? Hence Islam
is not from God!
(b). People of west are really coming to Islamic ideology! That is why Zakir Nai
k has been banned from even entering in Canada and UK. May be, westerns have bec
ome so much Islamic that they don t require outside preachers preach Islam anymore
!
Claim 8: Miracle of Kaba being center of the earth has been proven scientificall
y.
(a). If Kaba is at the center, how does it prove trueness of Islam? Kaba was bui
lt by Ibrahim, who was the father of Jewish people. Should not then this miracle
of Kaba being the center of earth proves trueness of Judaism instead of Islam?
(b).
(i)Anyway, this is the most foolish thing one can claim! Earth is almost spheric
al and its center lies inside it. How can Kaba be at the center? Can the center
of a sphere lie on its surface? Even if one talks about the surface, every point
on the surface of a sphere is geometrically same. Then what is so special about
Kaba?
(ii) The scientists, who claimed it, must be Madarsa alumni because science has
not become advanced enough to shift the center of gravity of earth from its cent
er to its surface! Of course, Madarsas have the technology of Kun Fayakun , which i
s unique solution to every problem and above all, Allah knows the best!
Claim 9: Miracles of Allah are seen even in animals and birds. For example many
goats, cows have been found to have name of Allah and Muhammad written on their
backs. Many crows, dogs, and donkeys have been seen to call Allah Allah . One can t
ype miracles of Islam in youtube and find hundreds of such videos.
(a). It seems that the testimonies of famous (?) scientists, Moulvis, and Shanka
racharya were not enough to prove Islam best. Hence people have started giving t
estimonies of animals in order to show superiority of Islam. Wise choose the pat
h, which other wiser people have chosen. But in Islam, it is other way round. Mu
slims argue that we should accept Islam because animals say Allah Allah ! Again the
question arises, can deeds of animals be the bench mark for humans? If that be
so, why do muslims wear cloths, go to schools/Madarsas, accept the marriage bond
, work in offices, wash hands, take bath .? Moreover not all animals say Allah! So
 again, by number logic, Islam is not from God! Anyway, we give advice to Zakir
and his followers, not to follow animals, but follow intelligent.
(b). In reality, the videos of such miracles of Allah are nothing more than the
laughter shows! Readers can themselves see those videos and get a heavy dose of
laughter. Those videos are even more entertaining than those of stage performer
Zakir Naik. All I can say, it is the biggest mockery of Islam and Allah by musli
ms themselves in the name of miracles.
Claim 10: People are leaving other religions to accept Islam but no muslim leave
s Islam.
(a). This is obvious as Islam orders to kill the one, who leaves it. This is the
reason why is Islam a one way trap, in which one can enter but cannot come out.
Biggest reason behind this is the coward mentality of muslims of not allowing n
on muslims to preach in their countries. One can see heights of fanaticism of Mu
slims that they want freedom of speech in every country and they enjoy convertin
g others. But they don t have guts to let others preach their religion among musli
ms.
(b). This claim is false though! There have been great scholars within Islam, wh
o openly criticized many doctrines of it. For example, Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, the
biggest Islamic educationist of India, founder of Aligarh Muslim University, ope
nly denied the existence of Satan. He criticized many other beliefs as well and
as a result, fatwa was issued that he is a Kafir! Anwar Shaikh, another eminent
scholar of Islam from Pakistan, calls Islam, The Arab Imperialism ! He was cremated
instead of burying as per his wish to die as Vedic follower. He was very proud
of his Vedic culture and ancestors. Another notable scholar from Pakistan is Ghu
lam Jelani Barq, who completely rejected the hadith! He was also listed as Kafir
by the mullahs. Today, Ali Sina, Parvin Darabi, Wafa Sultan, Parvez Hoodbhoy, T
ariq Ali, Imam Mehboob Ali, and many more are criticizing Islam greater than any
non muslim. They all were born in Islamic families. So according to this logic,
Islam is false because many scholars have left it!
After analyzing these claims, we can conclude that fanatics like Zakir Naik are
spreading the hoax of Islamic superiority based on their own false census of hig
hest conversion rate. People are being fooled by the so called experts of compar
ative religion in the name of childish logic, self created census, and science.
We have seen that how mocking was it to claim Islam best because some animals sa
id Allah Allah . In the end, we request everyone to think rationally and then take
a decision. Crowded place should not be the destination of intellectuals. Rather
, it should be based on logic and morality.
Follow the right path, irrespective of how many people are with you. Don t reject t
he truth even if you are alone and whole world is against you, because in the en
d, it is only truth, which will prevail
-Rigved
In one of his most acclaimed articles that he narrates verbatim in all Peace TV
programs, Dr Zakir Naik answers a very pertinent question All religions basically
teach us to be good human beings. Why then follow only in Islam? .
In his characteristic style, Zakir Naik announces that Islam is the most practica
l religion of world and hence the best and ONLY religion to be accepted by Allah
or God.
He provides an example that Islam not only says that robbery is bad, but also pr
ovides a practical method to eliminate robbery. Hence Islam is the best. He conv
eniently forgets that the following facts:
a. Somalia the country with highest proportion of Sunni Muslims (the branch of I
slam that Zakir Naik follows) in world, produces the largest number of robbers i
n the world. Somalia s capital is the most dangerous place on earth as per all sur
veys and Somalian pirates have earned fame for reasons known to all of us. Somal
ia is a live example of what practical Islam means.
b. In Global Peace Index, the bottom five countries are those dominated by Islam
Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, Sudan and Pakistan.
c. Algeria (again 100% Muslim) is worst offender on human rights as per all surv
eys. In fact any layman can come up with a clear reverse correlation between pro
portion of Sunni Muslims and human rights in any country in the world!
Another example he provides is that of Islamic concept of hijab and rules regard
ing attitude toward women preventing atrocity and rape of women in a practical m
anner. Again he forgets that:
a. The worst offenders in matters of gender rights are the countries with highes
t proportion of Muslim population. Afghanistan, Somalia, Iran, Iraq, Algeria, Ba
ngladesh, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia you name the country and check their population
profile! (The only Muslim countries which are not culprits of human rights and
gender rights violation are those who do not take Islamic Sharia so seriously!)
b. The Islamic requirement of woman needing several live observers of crimes lik
e rape, or to prove that she is not adulterous, makes it impossible for women to
get justice.
c. There is no provision of divorce in Muslim countries, and freedom to marry se
veral women and keep others as slave-girls is ordained by Holy Quran.
What more, readers are advised to read the 5 articles on Islam and Women on Agni
veer site (under Category Islam ) to know more about practical methods that Islam p
rovides for women emancipation!
On contrary, countries with lowest proportion of conservative Muslim population
are among the most peaceful ones. Even in India, the state with least Muslim pop
ulation proportion is Himachal Pradesh which is the most peaceful and flourishin
g states. And we all know which states are worst in these matters and what is th
e population profile of those states. We all would like to know why Sachar Commi
ttee report was thrust across our throats if Islam indeed is such a practical re
ligion to provide peace and prosperity to its followers and why the poorest coun
tries of the world are Muslim?
In this article we explore Islamic scriptures to see what the practicality of Is
lam, that Zakir Naik shouts so much about, actually implies.
Hadiths: Practical Handbooks of Islam
Ahadith or Hadiths or Hadees are known to be the practical handbook of Islam. No
person can practice Islam unless he/she is guided with the light of Ahadith. It
will not be an exaggeration to say that if Quran is the principle of Islam, Aha
dith are implementation of the same. In other words, Quran is incomplete without
Ahadith. Hadith and Quran are like two poles, neither of which can exist alone.
A muslim can not practice Islam until he takes shelter of Hadith. This is evide
nt from the fact that a Muslim cannot even know how to offer prayers by using Qu
ran alone. This secret is unleashed in Ahadith.
Hadith have no lesser importance than Quran in terms of belief, as all the Islam
ic institutions clearly recommend hell for those who reject Sahih Hadith, irresp
ective of their belief in Muhammad, Allah, Satan, hell, heaven, angels, Quran, e
tc.
It is on basis of Hadiths that Muslims claim Islam to be the most practical reli
gion among all. Even Islamic law or sharia is derived from Hadiths. This article
contains quotes from the Sahih Hadiths, which are supposed to provide practical
solutions to concerns of mankind. This article hardly contains any of our perso
nal analysis. We quote straight from the scriptures and have left it to readers
to judge themselves, whether they see any practicality in Islam or not! We canno
t agree more with Zakir Bhai MBBS that to know about a religion look at the scri
ptures!
Note: We have taken these references of Hadiths directly from established Islami
c sources and websites and not from any anti-Islamic site(s). Nor did we find th
e need to modify the language of these self-explanatory Hadiths. You can search
most of these Hadiths yourself from http://www.msawest.net/islam/reference/searc
hhadith.html for example, or any other Islamic site or get from any seller of Is
lamic texts.)
1. Innovative rape techniques for Jehadis:
Sahih Muslim: Book 008, Number 3371:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa id, did
you hear Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al- azl? He said: Yes,
and added: We went out with Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expe
dition to the Bi l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we des
ired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same
time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse
with them but by observing azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emissio
n of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah s
Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah s Mes- senger (may pea
ce be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every
soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
Book 008, Number 3373:
Abu Sa id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives,
and we wanted to do azl (coitus interruptus) with them. We then asked Allah s Messe
nger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, veri
ly you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day
of judgment must be born.
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 137:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus wit
h them. So we asked Allah s Apostle about it and he said, Do you really do that? rep
eating the question thrice, There is no soul that is destined to exist but will c
ome into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.
Comment: Mohammad says to his followers to verily go ahead and rape the captive
infidel women. With such evil, ridiculous teachings in Islam, how can Zakir Naik
claim Islam to be practical for women rights and human rights! Or is it practic
al only for the rapists?
2. Killing those who refuse to accept Islam
Sahih Muslim
Chapter 1 : REGARDING PERMISSION TO MAKE A RAID, WITHOUT AN ULTIMATUM, UPON THE
DISBELIEVERS WHO HAVE ALREADY BEEN INVITED TO ACCEPT ISLAM
Book 19, Number 4292:
Ibn Aun reported: I wrote to Nafi inquiring from him whether it was necessary to e
xtend (to the disbelievers) an invitation to accept (Islam) before meeting them
in fight. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) made a raid upon Banu M
ustaliq while they were unaware and their cattle were having a drink at the wate
r. He killed those who fought and imprisoned others. On that very day, he captur
ed Juwairiya bint al-Harith. Nafi said that this tradition was related to him by
Abdullah b. Umar who (himself) was among the raiding troops.
Book 19, Number 4293:
This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Ibn Aun and the name of Juwairi
ya bint al-Harith was mentioned beyond any doubt.
Comment: Thus, if any one of us has ever been invited to accept Islam (as done t
hrough Peace TV and websites), now we can be murdered by grace of Allah without
any notice! Does Osama Bin Laden need any other justification? And That is why Z
akir Naik cannot criticize Osama after all this?
3. Killing Women and Children
SAHIH MUSLIM Chapter 9 : PERMISSIBILITY OF KILLING WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THE NIG
HT RAIDS
Book 19, Number 4321:
It is reported on the authority of Sa b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (ma
y peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists
being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.
Book 19, Number 4322:
It is narrated by Sa b b. Jaththama that he said (to the Holy Prophet): Messenger
of Allah, we kill the children of the polytheists during the night raids. He sai
d: They are from them.
Book 19, Number 4323:
Sa b b. Jaththama has narrated that the Prophet (may peace be upon him) asked: Wha
t about the children of polytheists killed by the cavalry during the night raid?
He said: They are from them.
Comment: What additional gospel do terrorists need to plant bombs, hijack planes
and conduct 26/11 or 9/11!
4. Breast-feeding young men
Sahih Muslim
Chapter 28: SUCKLING OF A YOUNG (BOY) Book 008, Number 3424: A isha (Allah be plea
sed with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail came to Allah s Apostle (may peace b
e eupon him) and said: Messengerof Allah, I see on the face of Abu Hudhaifa (sig
ns of disgust) on entering of Salim (who is an ally) into (our house), whereupon
Allah s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Suckle him. She said: How can I suc
kle him as he is a grown-up man? Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) smiled
and said: I already know that he is a young man Amr has made this addition in his
narration that he participated in the Battle of Badr and in the narration of Ib
n Umar (the words are): Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) laughed.
Book 008, Number 3425: A isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the
freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. She (
i. e. the daughter of Suhail came to Allah s Apostle (may peace be upon him) and s
aid: Salim has attained (purbety) as men attain, and he understands what they un
derstand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that something (r
ankles) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa, whereupon Allah s Apostle (may peace be upon
him) said to her: Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the ra
nkling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and s
aid: So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappe
ared.
Book 008, Number 3427: Umm Salama said to A isha (Allah be pleased with her): A you
ng boy who is at the threshold of puberty comes to you. I, however, do not like
that he should come to me, whereupon A isha (Allah be pleased with her) said: Don t y
ou see in Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) a model for you? She also said
: The wife of Abu Hudhaifa said: Messenger of Allah, Salim comes to me and now h
e is a (grown-up) person, and there is something that (rankles) in the mind of A
bu Hudhaifa about him, whereupon Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: S
uckle him (so that he may become your foster-child), and thus he may be able to
come to you (freely).
Book 008, Number 3428: Zainab daughter of Abu Salama reported: I heard Umm Salam
a, the wife of Allah s Apostle (may peace be upon himy, saying to A isha: By Allah, I
do not like to be seen by a young boy who has passed the period of fosterage, w
hereupon she ( A isha) said: Why is it so? Sahla daughter of Suhail came to Allah s Me
ssenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah s Messenger, I swear by Allah that
I see in the face of Abu Hudhaifa (the signs of disgust) on account of entering
of Salim (in the house), whereupon Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said
: Suckle him. She (Sahla bint Suhail) said: He has a heard. But he (again) said:
Suckle him, and it would remove what is there (expression of disgust) on the fa
ce of Abu Hudhaifa. She said: (I did that) and, by Allah, I did not see (any sig
n of disgust) on the face of Abu Hadhaifa.
Comment: A fatwa has already been issued to allow women to freely mix with men a
fter she breast-feeds them! Can one imagine the limits of insanity one can reach
in name of Islamic practicality!
5. Allah permits rape of married women
Sahih Muslim
Chapter 29: IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A CAPTIVE WOMAN AF
TER SHE IS PURIFIED (OF MENSES OR DELIVERY). IN CASE SHE HAS A HUSBAND, HER MARR
IAGE IS ABROGATED AFTER SHE BECOMES CAPTIVE
Book 008, Number 3432: Abu Sa id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported t
hat at the Battle of Hanain Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) sent an army
to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them a
nd taken them captives, the Companions of Allah s Messenger (may peace te upon him
) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their
husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: And
women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24) (i. e.
they were lawful for them when their Idda period came to an end).
Book 008, Number 3433: Abu Sa id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported th
at Allah s Apostle (may peace be upon him) sent a small army. The rest of the hadi
th is the same except this that he said: Except what your right hands possessout
of them are lawful for you; and he did not mention when their idda period comes t
o an end . This hadith has been reported on the authority of AbuSa id (al-Khudri) (A
llah be pleased with him) through another chain of transmitters and the words ar
e: They took captives (women) on the day of Autas who had their husbands. They w
ere afraid (to have sexual intercourse with them) when this verse was revealed: A
nd women already married except those whom you right hands posses (iv. 24) Book 0
08, Number 3434: Qatada reported a hadith like this with the same chain of trans
mitters.
Comment: And they say Islam protects dignity of women! Would Zakir Naik discuss
these verses in his next lecture on Practical Islam!
6. Kill Someone who leaves Islam
Sahih Muslim Book 16, Number 4154:
Abdullah (b. Mas ud) reported: Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) stood up and
said : By Him besides Whom there is no god but He, the blood of a Muslim who be
ars the testimony that there is no god but Allah, and I am His Messenger, may be
lawfully shed only in case of three persons: the one who abandons Islam, and de
serts the community [Ahmad, one of the narrators, is doubtful whether the Holy P
rophet (may peace be upon him) used the word li l-jama ah or al-jama ah), and the marr
ied adulterer, and life for life.
The definition of Islam is given in an earlier hadith:
Book 16, Number 4152:
Abdullah (b. Mas ud) reported Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying : I
t is not permissible to take the life of a Muslim who bears testimony (to the fa
ct that there is no god but Allah, and I am the Messenger of Allah, but in one o
f the three cases: the married adulterer, a life for life, and the deserter of h
is Din (Islam), abandoning the community.
Comment: Poor Muslims! One can only pity on the way they have been trapped to be
silent followers of perversion or face death. The situation of women is even wo
rse. (Refer the 5 articles on Women and Islam on Agniveer site)
Hadiths have been tools for stereotypical Mullahs to spread their venom and main
tain their control over innocent Muslims. However many progressive Muslims have
written against Hadiths and have suggested that unless Islam gets rid of these H
adiths, there can be no ray of hope for Muslims and the world. Prominent among t
hem is Maulana Jeelani Barq whose seminal work Dual Islam criticizes Hadiths as pl
ague of Islam. You can read it here.
When Rajpal published Rangeela Rasul, he was murdered as per the above Hadiths a
nd related verses of Quran. But the fact remains that the book was solely based
on Hadiths that are considered authoritative by all Maulvis. Interestingly, rece
ntly Deoband issued a fatwa that if someone accepts Quran but not Hadiths, he or
she is destined to burn in Hell forever!
7. Prophet orders to believe only in him or face Hell
Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 13: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah s Apostle said, By
Him in Whose Hands my life is, none of you will have faith till he loves me more
than his father and his children.
Volume 1, Book 2, Number 14: Narrated Anas: The Prophet said None of you will hav
e faith till he loves me more than his father, his children and all mankind.
Volume 1, Book 2, Number 25: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah s Apostle was asked, What
is the best deed? He replied, To believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The
questioner then asked, What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, To participate
in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah s Cause. The questioner again asked, What is
the next (in goodness)? He replied, To perform Hajj (Pilgrim age to Mecca) Mubrur,
(which is accepted by Allah and is performed with the intention of seeking Allah s
pleasure only and not to show off and without committing a sin and in accordanc
e with the traditions of the Prophet).
Agniveer appeals to all right-minded Muslims to rise above such madness and gene
rate the courage to outrightly reject all the Hadiths and all those verses of Qu
ran that spread hatred against non-believers and curtail rights of women. We app
eal to them to gather courage and reasoning to understand that this step of thei
rs is necessary to change the future of world, and they have to break the traps
of perverted Mullahs like Zakir Naik who use these Hadiths and false verses to p
romote intolerance. Here is a sample:
If this be the definition of practical Islam, may Ishwar grant us all impractica
lity so that world is a more peaceful and sensible place for dignified living!
Note: All our articles on analysis of Islam are based on the translations and co
mmentaries of Islamic texts like Quran, Hadiths etc as published by all major Is
lamic publishing sources. These are the publicly available translations that are
 used for promotion of Islam by prominent representatives. We however believe th
at most of these texts have been wrongly translated, misinterpreted, misquoted o
r even have been tampered with and interpolated to suit the selfish designs of p
roponents of Islam after Muhammad. Thus, we believe that original Islam and orig
inal Quran of Muhammad is totally different from what has been propagated by his
namesake followers in name of Islam. There are few minority groups in Muslims w
hose scholars subscribe to our views and interpret/translate Islamic texts diffe
rently or even refuse to consider the available Quran and Hadiths as authentic.
But these scholars themselves are considered Kafirs and are condemned by ruling
elite of Islam. Thus when we refer to Islam, we actually imply these ruling elit
es of Islam and not Muslims or all Islamic scholars in general. Wherever we crit
ically evaluate Muhammad, we imply the fictitious Muhammad propagated by these f
alse texts or their wrong translations and not the original Muhammad. We have hi
gh regard for original Muhammad who stood for non-violence and tolerance. Simila
rly when we analyze Islamic texts, we refer to these questionable translations/v
ersions and NOT original texts. Further, we have sense of highest level of broth
erhood for Muslims in general. Wherever we use the word Muslim in critical manne
r, it refers to false representatives of Islam and not Muslims in general. Reade
rs are requested to keep this in mind to understand correct perspective of the a
rticles.

Test of secularism for Zakir Naik

We live in a secular country. And indeed secularism is one of the most noble con
cepts of humanity that no policy, system, process or mindset shall be influenced
by any cult or notions about religion. The entire concept of secularism is base
d on the precept of communal harmony . Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was a great sup
porter of communal harmony . He popularized the bhajan Ishwar Allah Tero Naam which m
eans that Ishwar and Allah are same. The communally harmonious and secular peopl
e of his era used to sing this melodious song in all temples and the trend conti
nues till today. I still recall how we grew up singing this song in school and a
ll public gatherings.
Forces like VHP, RSS and Arya Samaj are often alleged to be fanatic, rightist an
d hell-bent on destroying communal harmony . The intelligentsia of the country and
world is thoroughly worried with growth of these fundamentalist forces in recent
times and how it is disrupting peace and harmony in the sub-continent. Whenever
there is a terrorist attack, these fundamentalist forces would term it as Islam
ic terror and then the secular media has to spend lots of efforts and energies t
o explain that terrorism has no religion. It has to come up with videos and film
s of nice Muslims and bad Hindus to compensate for the wrong notions regarding M
uslims. It has to blow out of proportion cases like petty bomb-blasts in Malegao
n where cow-slaughter is a rampant practice. And then the entire state machinery
gears up to catch hold of some rightist forces allegedly behind these attacks.
Its a different matter that some of the larger terrorist attacks are not big eno
ugh to awaken the same machinery of state and we keep waiting for Afzal s sentence
for ages. The summary notion that the intellectuals of this country (India) in
particular have is that Hindus have become very fundamentalist. They tend to bla
me all Muslims and specially the clergy for all the terrorism that is happening
internationally. It is just a matter of coincidence and conspiracy of western me
dia that most terrorists, terrorist groups or Somalian pirates who come in limel
ight happen to be Muslim. But the reality is that Hindu terrorism is even more d
angerous. And hence curbing this should be number one priority.
We shall evaluate the Hindu and Islamic terrorism and their cause in some of the
later posts. But for now, let us propose a very practical solution for all Hind
us and Muslims to enhance communal harmony and promote secularism. I am inspired
by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi to offer this solution. Those who abide by this s
olution are true secularists and those who refuse to accept it are the real fund
amentalists. Because all I offer is an extension of the Gandhian Ishwar Allah Te
ro Naam.
So here is the solution cum test of secularism:
1. Let all temples recite verses of Quran on loudspeaker every day after prayers
and let all mosques recite verses from Geeta and Vedas.
2. Let all temples and mosques announce through loudspeakers and write on their
walls that Ishwar and Allah are same, Ram and Rahim are same, Geeta and Quran ar
e same, Kashi and Kaba are same
3. Let there be Yajna/ Havan in mosques and Namaz in temples at same time.
To start the process, let the leading temples and mosques come out for this init
iative. Agniveer has already discussed this with leading temples of India to do
the same. Let now the Muslims come up with list of mosques like Jama Masjid who
agree to this.
Agniveer is ready to put Ishwar and Allah are same, Ram and Rahim are same, Geet
a and Quran are same, Kashi and Kaba are same prominently on its website on front
page. Let IRF also do the same.
Agniveer is ready to come on stage and bring prominent Hindu leaders who would a
nnounce this on stage. Let Zakir Naik, Imam Bukhari and other Islamic scholars a
lso announce this on stage.
Agniveer is ready to pronounce and also have other Hindu scholars pronounce that
: Hindu or non-Hindu, all good people will achieve Swarg/ Heaven . Let Zakir Naik,
Imam Bukhari, Deobandis and other Islamic scholars also proclaim that Muslim or n
on-Muslim, all good people will achieve Paradise or Zannat.
Let us now see who really wants communal harmony. Any organization that refuses
to agree to above should be banned for being fundamentalist in interest of commu
nal harmony.
This is the real test of secularism. If indeed Zakir Naik can proclaim the above
statements on stage and put on his website, Agniveer shall also do the same on
his website and remove all articles against Zakir Naik immediately.
But yes, if Zakir Naik, Bukhari and other representatives of Islam refuse to agr
ee to above and Hindus continue to sing Ishwar Allah Tero Naam , then there would b
e no community more foolish than Hindus. Because one who continues to offer milk
to a cobra and willingly puts it over his head, believing it to be a spiritual
Shesh Naag, deserves to be destroyed. Let Zakir Naik and Bukhari prove that they
are indeed Shesh Naag and not Aasteen ka Saanp through their actions.
And till these Muslim representatives refuse to pass the above test of secularis
m, so-called intellectuals have no business to term any Hindu organization or fo
rce as fundamentalist or extremist.
Mohandas could convince only the Hindus to sing Ishwar Allah Tero Naam in temples
and they continue to sing till today. Let this glorious song now reverberate in
mosques and IRF shows and bring true communal harmony in country and world.
Kaba or Idol Worship? Zakir Naik please explain

Idols are considered to be another means of representing and meditating upon the
Ultimate Ishwar/God which cannot be easily appreciated by human minds. Thus hum
ans created idol of God to show their respect to Him and offer their gratitude.
Vedas however do not prescribe idol worship because they offer alternate and mor
e effective means to worship and thank God through noble actions, noble thoughts
and noble emotions. The Vedic approach also saves us from various potential pit
falls of idol worship like human tendency to attempt to fool God by assuming tha
t his/her job is done after the bowing down or ritual of worship. It also ensure
s that dumb minds do not start taking an idol to be actually God and not mere a
piece of stone. And most importantly, the Vedic view is that the root cause of a
ll grief is ignorance or Avidya. And eradication of Avidya implies that everythi
ng should be considered what it exactly is. Thus a formless Ishwar must be worsh
ipped like a formless entity alone, through Yogic methods, to achieve salvation.
Nonetheless, Vedas, while not recommending idol worship, are also not intolerant
to those who perform idol worship. The only means that Vedas prescribe to eradi
cate the habit of idol worship is through spread of Vidya or true knowledge, com
passionate relationship among all humans like that between mother and child, and
allowing time and space for each soul to discover the truth by itself rather th
an being forced to believe in something through threat or force. That is why, in
Vedic culture, while many saints and scholars have been worshippers of formless
Ishwar and many others have been idol worshippers, they have debated with each
other in peaceful and cordial manner to come closer to truth without terming eac
h other as Hell-seekers, apostates or scoundrels. This is the way of the civiliz
ed as inspired from the Vedas.
There is however one cult Islam that claims to be completely monotheistic and ag
ainst idol worship and has had a history of banning idol-worship through all pos
sible forceful and deceitful means. Idol worship, as per Islam, is greatest sin.
And if someone worships an idol, despite he or she being how-so-much noble, gen
tle, saintly or good-hearted, there is no way he or she can go to Heaven and wil
l have to burn in Hell forever. The doors of Heaven are closed forever for a per
son, who despite the best qualities, is an idol worshipper. And he or she has no
choice but to burn in Hell forever and drink boiled water till eternity. A rapi
st, pedophile, murderer, cheat can still have access card to enter Heaven if he
shuns idol worship and embraces Quran, Muhammad, Allah without idols, Angels and
Judgment Day without any application of brain.
So much has been paranoia against idol worship in Islam, that even pictorial or
artistic representation of any animate entity is haram or banned.
In this article, we shall not analyze idol worship in general or the cause of ha
tred of Islam against idol worshippers. We would simply analyze if indeed Muslim
s are not idol worshippers? As we shall see, it is impossible for anyone to be a
Muslim without being an idol worshipper. And the greatest example of this idol
worship is Kaba worship. No Muslim can be a Muslim if he does everything else as
per Quran, but refuses to bow down to Kaba in his passion to avoid idol worship
of all forms.
Our dear old friend, Zakir Bhai, gives 6 arguments to prove that Kaba worship in
reality is not worship. The arguments are as intelligent as his overall intelle
ct exhibited in his other articles and videos. (Though I still admire the confid
ence with which he puts forth the most stupid argument, and still gets a big app
lause from his semi-literate audience. I wish I had the same shameless confidenc
e or had access to such a great audience that would clap on my silliest PJ s!)
For novices to Islam, let me set the context. Kaba is a square building in Mecca
which is the most sacred place for a Muslim. Kaba used to be worshipped in a se
t ritualistic manner since ages before advent of Muhammad. And while Muhammad tr
ied to stop almost prevalent practices of his times, he curiously allowed contin
uation of the same Kaba worship and kissing of black stone there. The other prac
tice that he continued to be allowed was circumcision. While all the Mecca dwell
ers were butchered by Muhammad s army in Holy war (Zakir Naik gives evidence of Veda
s to prove that Muhammad killed 60,000 people of Mecca!), still he could not sto
p the Kaba worship in same ritualistic manner, perhaps because the affection of
the people towards Kaba in that era was too strong to be mellowed down by sword.
So an exception was made for Kaba in Muhammad s Islam. And hence, if you want vir
gins of Heaven, better not ask any questions and simply go round the Kaba withou
t applying your mind.
(I have just provided gist of story as propounded by Islamic scholars. I persona
lly do not believe in Muhammad being author of all verses in present Quran in fi
rst place)
So here are the brilliant arguments of Zakir Naik. (Note that we will not dwell
into whether the black stone is washed after kissing by so many people, or the h
ygiene aspects of millions of people kissing the same stone and mixing each othe
r s saliva. Zakir Naik having been an MBBS sometime ago, may evaluate this better.
)
Argument 1. Kaba is Qibla (direction) and since we Muslims believe in unity, we
face in the direction of Kaba while praying.
Comments:
a. Muslims believe in unity according to Zakir Naik! More than 100 sects of Isla
m today are in support of his claim! Sunni, Shia, Qadiyani, Khoja, Wahabi, Bohra .
.all support him with unity! Can anyone still dare to ask him that if muslims we
re/are so united, how could more than 100 sects within Islam come into existence
?
b. What is the need of unity during the prayers? Should not one be free to pray
as per one s own choice? If unity is required everywhere then why not eat, drink,
and sleep at the same time and in same direction? If I want to pray in any direc
tion, why will not God accept it?
c. Many Muslims pray alone in their houses most of the times. How does Qibla (di
rection) matter in this case when there is no one to get united?
d. Do Muslims actually have unity in direction while prayers? When a Muslim in e
ast of Mecca faces west, at the same time a Muslim in west of Mecca faces east!
Both face opposite to each other! If Zakir Naik says this as unity then two armi
es facing each other should also be considered as united and thus friends!
e. To which direction a Muslim will bow, who is just opposite of Mecca on spheri
cal earth ? He has both options to bow to his east or west! How does the concept
of unity work there?
f. Very few Muslims know that inside Kaba, no direction is needed. People can fa
ce and bow down to any direction they want. This exposes the fallacies of Zakir s
claim of unity blatantly. Zakir says that Muslims should bow down to one directi
on only, so that they can remain united. One can ask him; don t Muslims inside Kab
a need unity? And if they can remain united without bowing down to a common dire
ction inside Kaba, why can t they do it outside too?
g. This is very strange that after so much of efforts to remain united, today, m
ost of the bombers and their victims are Muslims!
h. Uthmaan, third Caliph of Islam, compiler of modern Quran was killed by none o
ther than Muslims led by Aisha s brother and Abu Bakr s son while he was offering pr
ayer. Can there be a greater example of unity during prayers than this? (Remembe
r that Aisha was Muhammad s beloved child wife with whom Allah had divinely fixed
his marriage!)
Argument 2. Kaba is at the centre of the earth.
Comments:
a. According to Zakir s science, Kaba is at the centre of the globe but science sa
ys that every point on a sphere is geometrically same. In this way every place o
n earth is centre. If Zakir means equidistant from both poles, he is wrong. Kaba
is at 21 degree north on globe which means that if it is at a distance of 30 un
its from North Pole, it has to be 50 units distant from South Pole!
b. Anyway, whatever may be the case with Kaba s latitude and longitude, one thing
is clear. There are infinite number of places on earth which either have same la
titude or same longitude as that of Kaba. So there is no reason why Kaba should
be given a special status.
Argument 3. We Muslims circumambulate the Kaba because it represents that there
is only one God just like there is only one centre of a circle.
Comments:
a. Many hindus circumambulate their holy places. But then why is that Shirk in t
he eyes of Zakir Naik if circumambulation can mean just believe in one God ?
b. During Aarti , a Hindu ritual, in which prayers are offered by devotee, the plat
e is moved around making circle with a unique centre! So Hindus also believe in
one God and they show it by moving the plate so that it makes circle with one ce
ntre!
c. Can a Muslim circumambulate his house or a temple for this purpose? If yes, w
hy do Muslims go for Hajj? How does circumambulation of the temple or a house di
fferent than that of Kaba?
d. Can Zakir Naik give any reference from Quran or Sahih Hadith, which supports
his claim of one centre-one God concept behind circumambulation?
e. If I interpret the circumambulation as a circle has infinite points inside it
and thus there are infinite Gods in Islam ! How can Zakir refute my claim?
f. If circumambulation means one centre-one God , why don t Muslims do it in their mo
sques along with their prayers every time? If one says that prayers already incl
ude One God philosophy then circumambulation at Hajj is needless as Muslims offe
r their prayers there too!
g. According to Zakir Naik, unique centre of a circle represents One God. Is it
not Shirk to believe the centre of a circle similitude of God? If Muslims themse
lves believe in such representations of God, why do they condemn non Muslims for
their idols? If such rituals in the name of One Allah can be accepted by Zakir
Naik, why can t he accept the idols as yet another representation of God s different
qualities in different forms?
Argument 4: Bukhari [2-56-675]-Umar told muslims that he kissed the black stone
only because Muhammad did so, otherwise this stone can neither benefit me nor ca
n it cause me harm. This is the proof that we Muslims don t worship the Kaba.
a. Now Zakir Naik has the testimony of Umar that, kissing black stone is not ido
l worship because there is nothing special about that stone other than Muhammad
kissed it. Can we ask, why did Muhammad kiss the stone then? There must be somet
hing special with the black stone so that Muhammad kissed it.
Umar sees nothing special with black stone and thus Zakir says kissing it is not
idol worship! By the same logic, since Muhammad kissed it, he would certainly b
e convinced of its divinity and thus kissing it is idol worship and Muhammad did
it! Since Muhammad was a bigger authority than Umar, kissing black stone is ido
l worship! ( I know this one would be too complex for madarsa minds!)
b. If Umar and Muslims kiss black stone just because Muhammad did so, and if it
is not idol worship, it is no less than human worship since following someone s or
der even without thinking its right or wrong shows the ultimate belief of the fo
llowers of a person in him. This is Shirk to believe someone other than God to b
e ultimate. So it is up to Zakir Naik what he wants to be, an idol worshipper or
a human worshipper! In both cases, Islam would send him to Dozakh (Hell).
c. By the same logic, Hindus and Christians can say that they do idol worship be
cause this is written in their books and their ancestors did so. If their ancest
ors would have not done this, they also would not be doing so! How will Zakir Bh
ai refute their claim?
Argument 5: At the time of the prophet, Sahabas (companions of Muhammad) used to
stand on Kaba and then give the Azaan. Can any idol worshipper do that? This is
the proof that we Muslims don t worship Kaba.
a. Great logic! But all the Hindus on Ganesh Utsav throw their idols in the rive
rs! Can any Muslim do that with black stone? Since no Muslim can do that, it pro
ves by Zakir s logic that Hindus don t worship idols but Muslims do!
b. Can any Muslim today, to debunk the claims of non Muslims of idolatry in Isla
m, touch the black stone with his feet?
c. If Kaba is just a Kibla (direction), can Zakir Naik hammer it down just like
his Arab masters did with the idols of Hindus while they invaded India? (If anyo
ne is hurt by this, please read those verses of Quran which order Muslims to bre
ak idols of others and kill the idolaters)
Argument 6. We Muslims don t bow to Kaba, we only bow to Allah.
a. Zakir Naik says that Muslims actually bow to Allah, but for unity they bow in
one direction. But as we know, Allah is on seventh heaven, should not then Musl
ims face upwards which is the actual direction of Allah instead of facing Kaba,
which is a mere stone?
b. Every idol worshipper says that he bows to his God only, but for the sake of
physical representation, he bows before idol. Why then Zakir Naik sees Shirk in
the idols of others but Tauheed in bowing, kissing, circumambulation of a stone ca
lled Kaba?
Now we will quickly summarize the similarities and dissimilarities between idol
worship and Kaba worship.
Similarities:
1. Muslims bow down to Kaba. Hindus bow before idols.
2. Muslims claim to remember Allah while they bow to Kaba. Hindus claim to remem
ber Eeshvar while bowing before idol.
3. Muslims circumambulate and kiss the Kaba. Hindus do Aarti before idol and fol
d their hands.
Dissimilarities:
1. Muslims bow Kaba five times a day whereas most of the Hindus hardly bow to id
ols once a week.
2. Muslims don t have liberty of choosing their direction of bowing whereas Hindus
can face whichever direction they want by choosing appropriate direction of ido
l.
3. Hindus throw their idols after they perform their rituals especially on some
occasions but no Muslims can ever think of doing so with the stone of Kaba.
4. Hindus fold their hands before idol just to give respect to God but Muslims k
iss the black stone because Muhammad did so.
Conclusion:
The above analysis proves that if Hindus are idolaters for performing certain ri
tuals, Muslims are no less than idolaters. In fact Muslims, in addition to idol
worshippers, are human worshippers as well, which we have proven above.
Further, idol worship by Hindus has some rationale behind it, and is not obligat
ory to save one from Hell. Islam idol worship of Kaba is must to save one from H
ell and get 72 virgins in Paradise.
We request our Muslim brothers and sisters to think about it with an unbiased mi
nd and then draw conclusions themselves. We also request all Hindus, Christians
and public in general to start worshipping the Ultimate in the most perfect mann
er as described in Vedas through noble thoughts, noble actions and noble meditat
ion as prescribed by the path of Yog.
Remember: God is existent, intelligent and blissful. He is formless, omniscient,
just, merciful, unborn, endless, unchangeable, beginning-less, unequalled, the s
upport of all, the master of all, omnipresent, immanent, un-aging, immortal, fea
rless, eternal and holy, and the maker of all. He alone is worthy of being worsh
iped .
Let us worship God/Ishwar in the way He actually is, and achieve ultimate bliss
for one and all. That is the sole purpose of our life and that is also the need
of the hour. Let us start worshipping Ishwar in the truest form, unite together,
and bring back the era of bliss, prosperity and salvation for everyone. Let us
worship Ishwar in same manner as Ram and Krishna worshipped them. Let us arouse
the Ram and Krishna within us and be the best devotees of Supreme Lord!
May the truth prevail! Let us work towards making truth prevail! Let us come bac
k to the Vedas!

Zakir Naik If you kill an INNOCENT, you kill entire humanity

Listen to any of the Zakir Naik videos or read any of his defense of terrorism n
ot being a Muslim monopoly, and he would quote in his characteristic semi-stamme
ring shoulder shrugging style: Quran Surah 5 Verse No 32 says that If you kill a
n innocent human, it is as though you have killed the entire humanity. Almost sim
ilar is the statement of another popular stuttering star Shahrukh Khan when he e
ulogizes Islam for being religion of peace! (Sorry for the comment, but Zakir be
ing a medical student, knows that one stutters and shrugs shoulders when he lies
! At least he should know so if he actually remembers medical studies as well, a
s per his claims!)
Indeed a very noble thought, and Agniveer salutes all those great men and women
who believe in the above verse with utmost sincerity. Agniveer also agrees that
Zakir Naik is not providing a wrong reference. The only problem is that he is qu
oting the verse incomplete and using Taqiah to fool the world. Now Taqiah is an
interesting concept used in several sects of Islam which means that it is fair t
o use deceit and fraud to defeat the enemy or non-Muslim.
To know the reality, let us review what the verse actually means as per leading
translations and commentaries of Quran. Note that we only refer to authentic Isl
amic sites and books for reference and not sites of anti-Muslim kafirs who are b
ound to burn in Hell forever! With these Kafirs, we shall in any case be spendin
g eternity after Judgement Day! For now, we shall only live in company of those
with whom we shall never meet in Hell because they would be enjoying virgins in
Heaven while our skins are being roasted in Hell!
Now this particular verse appears in different places in different versions of Q
uran. We are not sure where it actually appears in first Quran that was written
20 years after Muhammad s death. But in new versions of Quran available today, it
is verse 35 of Chapter 5 in some editions and verse 32 in others. Let scholars h
ow Islam decide and explain this discrepancy in numbering of verses in final mes
sage of Allah. But for us, the focus is actual verse as given by various transla
tors.
Sahih International
Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a sou
l unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land it is as if he had slai
n mankind entirely. And whoever saves one it is as if he had saved mankind entir
ely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indee
d many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.
Tafsir al-Jalalayn
Because of that, which Cain did, We decreed for the Children of Israel that whoe
ver slays a soul for other than a soul, slain, or for, other than, corruption, c
ommitted, in the land, in the way of unbelief, fornication or waylaying and the
like, it shall be as if he had slain mankind altogether; and whoever saves the l
ife of one, by refraining from slaying, it shall be as if he had saved the life
of all mankind Ibn Abbas said [that the above is meant] in the sense of violating
 and protecting its [a soul s] sanctity [respectively]. Our messengers have alread
y come to them, that is, to the Children of Israel, with clear proofs, miracles,
but after that many of them still commit excesses in the land, overstepping the
bounds through disbelief, killing and the like.
Yusuf Ali
On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a p
erson unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land- -it would be
as if he slew the whole people: And if any one saved a life, it would be as if h
e saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our Apost
les with Clear Signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit exc
esses in the land.
Now several points are very clear from the verse:
a. This verse is applicable only for people of Israel, and that is why Muslims h
ate Jews so much!
b. The Allah of Quran did not know of world beyond Israel, or else the final mes
sage of Allah for whole world should have provided message for entire world and
not only Israel! Though I appreciate the spirit of fanatics who now try to imple
ment draconian inhuman teachings of this new Quran to entire world, as though en
tire world is Israel!
c. The verse provides the conditions of exception. Anyone who is corrupt can be
killed. A corrupt person is not innocent as per Islam. So far so good. Even we b
elieve that corruption should have severe punishment. But let us go a step furth
er and see what exactly is corruption or innocence as per Islam. Tafseer-e-Jalal
ayn details this corruption includes unbelief among other variants.
So in summary, if you are not a Muslim, or you disbelieve in Allah, Rasul, Quran
, Angels, Judgment Day, Heaven, Hell you are not an innocent. You are corrupt an
d hence this verse is no way applicable to you. If you want to be innocent or no
t corrupt, accept Islam. To further substantiate this definition of innocence/ c
orruption, let us review the following:
1. Refer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4
The mullah, a very eminent one, claims very clearly that a non-Muslim is not inn
ocent and whatever a Muslim does, including terrorism, cannot be condemned by an
other Muslim. That is why Zakir Naik never condemns Osama Bin Laden.
2. Zakir Naik himself answers a question stating that if non-Muslims are perturb
ed because they are called Kafirs, they should embrace Islam. Refer his book on
Common Questions non-Muslims ask about Muslims. Whole of Quran is full of treatm
ent to be meted out to Kafirs and the are further elaborated by Hadiths. We shal
l provide some excerpts here itself.
3. The very next verse from same Surah 5 (Verse 33 in Sahih Internationl version
) explains the context of the previous verse. It says:
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and st
rive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucifi
ed or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be e
xiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in
the Hereafter is a great punishment,
The Tafseer-e-Jalalyn only elaborates upon this meaning more brutally and reader
s can check out for themselves from www.quran.com. The intent is clear if you ar
e corrupt (as per Islamic definition), or oppose Allah/ messsenger, you would be
 punished in most brutal manner. I would have wished that a book of peace would
have emphasized more on forgiving and not the punishments that would be meted ou
t if you do not yield.
Thus the very verse which is cited as verse of Peace by Zakir Naik and ShShShahr
ukh Khan are actually verses of blackmail and threat.
4. Some Muslims may argue that corruption does not include disbelief in Allah/ M
uhammad but only publicly mischievous activities. Our counter-question would be
to show one single verse from entire Quran that explicitly says that non-Muslims
or disbelievers are to be treated equally and that disbelief is not the gravest
crime. In fact, huge number of verses exist which claim that disbelief is the w
orst punishment.
5. As per fanatic version of Islam propagated by new Quran, Allah would forgive
anything but not disbelief in Allah/Rasul/Quran etc. If peaceful disbelief is in
deed innocence and not corruption, why would Allah punish peaceful innocents for
ever in Hell fire?
6. To understand true character of peace in Islam, let us review the following v
erses from Chapter 4:
92: Never should a believer kill a believer; but [If it so happens] by mistake,
[Compensation is due]: If one [so] kills a believer, it is ordained that he shou
ld free a believing slave, and pay compensation to the deceased s family,unless th
ey remit it freely. If the deceased belonged to a people at war withyou, and he
was a believer, the freeing of a believing slave [Is enough]. If he belonged to
a people with whom ye have treaty of Mutual alliance, compensation should be pai
d to his family, and a believing slave be freed. For those who find this beyond
their means, [is prescribed] a fast for two months running: by way of repentance
to Allah: for Allah hath all knowledge and all wisdom.
93. If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, to abide th
erein [For ever]: And the wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him, and a dread
ful penalty is prepared for him.
Very clearly, Hell is recommended only for killing a believer and not an innocen
t or non-believer. Further, in case of emergency, even if a believer is killed u
nintentionally, it is NOT as though entire humanity is killed. You can compensat
e by freeing a slave or paying compensation or fasting. That is why terrorists a
re so comfortable throwing bombs around and then compensating through fasts!
7. Islam makes it more clear in Surate Nisa 150, 151 that those who differentiat
e between Allah and Muhammad and say that they shall believe in some things but
not on other, and want to have a middle path are true Kafirs. And we have prepar
ed worst of punishments for them. Clearly disbelief is greatest corruption and t
he favorite verse of Zakir and Shahrukh are not going to save you!
8. Read the articles on Partiality of Allah , Islamic Jehad , Islam Reward and P
unishment and Shirk Why Islam is fanatic to find numerous verses that ensure tha
t a non-believer is not innocent and disbelief is greatest form of corruption or
mischief. And hence as per new Quran, non-Muslims simply do not qualify to be c
alled human beings worthy of kindness.
9. Often parrots like Zakir Naik claim that Jehad is misinterpreted and in fact
he himself is true Jehadi. I agree that Zakir Naik is a true Jehadi. But so are
Osama Bin Laden, Kasab and all terrorists who spread Islam through violence. Hus
aini clearly states that to overpower on might of Islam, Quran or Sword is Jeha
d. Get more details on article on Islamic Jehad.
10. Surate Imran 28 is elaborated by Jalalyn as follows: If for fear or self-def
ense, one has to make friends with Kafirs, there is no harm provided in heart yo
u have hatred and jealousy with Kafirs. That is why likes of Zakir Naik tend to
fool people (read non-Muslim kafirs) by showcasing Islam as peaceful religion an
d working in-hand with Bin Ladens of the world. This was also the strategy of Su
fis like Chistis whose sole aim was to spread Islam by fooling Hindus and acting
as spies of terrorists like Muhammad Ghauri.
11. Visit the site of Darul Uloom Deoband. It states Rights of Muslims and Right
s of Human Beings separately. All compassion, brotherhood etc are only for Musli
ms. You are expected to conceal their shortcomings, overlook his faults, remove
his difficulties, accept his excuses and do 36 more things for him. That is why
Zakir Naik et al never condemn Muslim terrorists and overlook their faults and r
emove their difficulties. That is why a fatwa is never issued against Shahrukh K
han for his vulgar movies but they will have objection to idol worship! And for
humans, very tacftully, it is mentioned that innocents should not be harmed. (We
know definition of innocent in above analysis) After 2 more silly points it is
mentioned that they should be punished only as per Shariat. Now they assume here
that non-Muslims would be interacting with Muslims only when Shariat (Islamic l
aw) is applied for punishments and not otherwise. And what Shariat would say wou
ld be clear to all by now. You can visit http://www.darululoom-deoband.com/engli
sh/books/rightsinislam.htm and check out further details on the minds of the fan
atics.
The message is very clear. If you are not a Muslim, you are NOT innocent. If you
are not a Muslim, you are the most corrupt person. Rapists and murderers may be
forgiven by Allah, but not you. So despite how much you admire Zakir Naik s antic
s or Shahrukh Khan s nautanki, there is no way that modern Islam can recommend pea
ce for you!
I appeal to all true lovers of peace and brotherhood, Muslim or non-Muslim, to r
ise up to combat the fraud and fanaticism propagated by these perverts and help
make world a safer place. I welcome all to Vedic Dharma the only religion for en
tire humanity, (refer Vedic Religion in brief ) that appeals to rise above all f
alse dogmas and hatred, and strive for true world peace based on wisdom and tole
rance. Religion etymologically means Joining again . So let us rise above barbaric
cults that divide people and strive for true humanity.
Let us join hands to tackle the menace of intolerance and deceit. Let us no more
be fooled by false promises of peace by those who, in any case, curse us to Hel
l forever for not agreeing with them. Let us wake up to combat such terrorist an
d fraudulent mindsets ourselves and justify our existence as Manushya creatures
who can think, analyze and rise above the self for welfare of all.
May the truth prevail!
Addendum:
Do not have the illusion of comfort that if you are a woman and have child, Jeha
dis would have mercy on you. In Islamic wars, women are the worst tortured. Men
die but women have to face the torments of remaining alive. That is why througho
ut history, during Muslim wars, Hindu women preferred to commit Jauhar or have t
hemselves killed. The ghastly practice of Sati has its origin in the Islamic vie
w of Kafir women. So we appeal to all sensible non-Muslims to beware of fanatics
like Zakir and others who emphasize on modern Quran being a book of peace. The
only Muslims who are peaceful are those who do not believe in Islam, or do not t
ake Quran seriously or have never read it. If you ever find a Muslim who claims
that he has studied the current Quran thoroughly and believes it to be final and
ONLY book of Allah and completely perfect, considers that all non-muslims would
go to Hell; rest assured, he is simply doing Taqiah (fraud) and can potentially
 be as dangerous as Osama or Zakir. Rise up to unite people against such bombs a
nd time-bombs before its too late.
I quote from authentic (Sahih) Hadiths on Islamic view on kafir women:
1. Innovative rape techniques for Jehadis:
Sahih Muslim: Book 008, Number 3371:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa id, did
you hear Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al- azl? He said: Yes,
and added: We went out with Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expe
dition to the Bi l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we des
ired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same
time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse
with them but by observing azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emissio
n of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah s
Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah s Mes- senger (may pea
ce be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every
soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
Book 008, Number 3373:
Abu Sa id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives,
and we wanted to do azl (coitus interruptus) with them. We then asked Allah s Messe
nger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, veri
ly you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day
of judgment must be born.
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 137:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus wit
h them. So we asked Allah s Apostle about it and he said, Do you really do that? rep
eating the question thrice, There is no soul that is destined to exist but will c
ome into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.
Comment: Mohammad says to his followers to verily go ahead and rape the captive
infidel women. With such evil, ridiculous teachings in Islam, how can Zakir Naik
claim Islam to be practical for women rights and human rights! Or is it practic
al only for the rapists?
2. Killing those who refuse to accept Islam
Sahih Muslim
Chapter 1 : REGARDING PERMISSION TO MAKE A RAID, WITHOUT AN ULTIMATUM, UPON THE
DISBELIEVERS WHO HAVE ALREADY BEEN INVITED TO ACCEPT ISLAM
Book 19, Number 4292:
Ibn Aun reported: I wrote to Nafi inquiring from him whether it was necessary to e
xtend (to the disbelievers) an invitation to accept (Islam) before meeting them
in fight. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) made a raid upon Banu M
ustaliq while they were unaware and their cattle were having a drink at the wate
r. He killed those who fought and imprisoned others. On that very day, he captur
ed Juwairiya bint al-Harith. Nafi said that this tradition was related to him by
Abdullah b. Umar who (himself) was among the raiding troops.
Book 19, Number 4293:
This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Ibn Aun and the name of Juwairi
ya bint al-Harith was mentioned beyond any doubt.
Comment: Thus, if any one of us has ever been invited to accept Islam (as done t
hrough Peace TV and websites), now we can be murdered by grace of Allah without
any notice! Does Osama Bin Laden need any other justification? And That is why Z
akir Naik cannot criticize Osama after all this?
3. Killing Women and Children
SAHIH MUSLIM Chapter 9 : PERMISSIBILITY OF KILLING WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THE NIG
HT RAIDS
Book 19, Number 4321:
It is reported on the authority of Sa b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (ma
y peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists
being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.
Book 19, Number 4322:
It is narrated by Sa b b. Jaththama that he said (to the Holy Prophet): Messenger
of Allah, we kill the children of the polytheists during the night raids. He sai
d: They are from them.
Book 19, Number 4323:
Sa b b. Jaththama has narrated that the Prophet (may peace be upon him) asked: Wha
t about the children of polytheists killed by the cavalry during the night raid?
He said: They are from them.
Answering Zakir Naik Quran says there is no compulsion in religion

This is yet another favorite quote of everyone who wants to showcase Islam as re
ligion of peace Zakir Naik, Shahrukh Khan, Barrack Obama and My Name is Khan lover
s etc. Even we agree that Surah Bakar 2:256 is one of the most benevolent verses
of Quran. Had this been the only verse in Quran, I would have hailed it as the
greatest slogan for tolerance and peace an echo of Vedas. Let me reproduce this
great verse here:
La ikraha fee addeeniqad tabayyana arrushdu mina alghayyi faman yakfur bittaghoot
iwayu/min billahi faqadi istamsaka bilAAurwatialwuthqa la infisama laha wallahus
ameeAAun AAaleem
There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct fr
om error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped
a firm handhold which will never break. Allah is Hearer, Knower.
I believe this verse must be belonging to the original Quran. This was the time
when Muhammad was joining people together in Medina for his great faith. He want
ed to make it as lenient and tolerant as one could. But this is only a small par
t from beginning of Quran. The real story unfolds from here:
a. In modern Quran, many Ayats/ verses are supposed to have been abrogated and r
eplaced with new Ayats. Sounds confusing! But thats true! Because there was no o
ther way to create a new Quran from old message of Muhammad. Let me explain this
concept of abrogation a bit here:
This doctrine of abrogation is based on two verses that Allah allegedly instruct
ed Mohammed to put into the Quran.
None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitut
e something better or similar: Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all t
hings? Surah 2: 106
When We substitute one revelation for another, and Allah knows best what He revea
ls (in stages), they say, Thou art but a forger : but most of them understand not. S
urah 16:101
As per these, new verses (Nasikh) in Quran replace old verses (Mansoukh). Out of
114 Chapters of Quran, at least 71 are supposed to have been affected by this c
oncept of abrogation. Refer al-Nasikh wal-Mansoukh (The Abrogator and the Abrogate
d) which was authored by the revered Muslim scholar Abil-Kasim Hibat-Allah Ibn-S
alama Abi-Nasr. The book goes through every Surah (chapter) in the Quran and cit
es in great detail every verse that was cancelled-out/overridden by particular v
erses that were written later. You can find more details on abrogation from anot
her kafir site: http://www.islamreview.com/articles/quransdoctrine.shtml (Note t
hat it only summarizes findings from Islamic texts and has nothing new to offer
on this weird topic)
The summary conclusion is clear:
Out of 114 chapters of Quran, maximum of 43 chapters remain which can be taken a
s authentic.
Without getting into much details, let us come to the main point Verse 2.256 tha
t claims there is no compulsion in religion was abrogated and replaced by Verse
9:5 The verse of sword. Now let us see what this verse is:
Sahih International
And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you f
ind them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every pla
ce of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let t
hem [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
Pickthall
Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find th
em, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.
But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their
way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
Shakir
So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you
find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in
every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leav
e their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
Jalalayn
Then, when the sacred months have passed that is, [at] the end of the period of
deferment slay the idolaters wherever you find them, be it during a lawful [peri
od] or a sacred [one], and take them, captive, and confine them, to castles and
forts, until they have no choice except [being put to] death or [acceptance of]
Islam; and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush, [at every] route that
they use (kulla, every , is in the accusative because a [preceding] genitive-taking
preposition has been removed). But if they repent, of unbelief, and establish p
rayer and pay the alms, then leave their way free, and do not interfere with the
m. God is Forgiving, Merciful, to those who repent.
The essence is that kill the idol worshippers wherever you can. The next verses
explain why you can never have treaty with idol worshippers and there are other
verses which say that even if you have to make friends with Kafirs, make sure yo
u have hatred against them in your heart. (Surah Imran 28)
1. Now, in recent times, many scholars have started arguing that 2.256 was not a
brogated and it remains a valid verse of Quran. But this argument is contradicto
ry of facts and itself:
a. If indeed there is no compulsion in religion, why is punishment for apostasy
DEATH in Islamic Shariat? Why does no scholar like Zakir Naik or anyone else eve
r proclaim that Suadi Arabia and all those countries who give death punishment f
or apostasy and insulting Islam/Prophet are against Islam and anti-Muslim?
b. If indeed this peaceful verse is valid, why is propagation of non-Muslim reli
gions prohibited in Muslim countries?
c. If indeed there is no compulsion in religion, why are there countless verses
asking to have hatred against non-believers and kill them or force them to becom
e Muslim? Refer Islamic Jehad article.
2. Some other scholars say that this verse was indeed abrogated but abrogation m
eans that in a different context of war, verse of Sword (9.5) would be valid, el
se in non-war situation verse of no-compulsion would be applicable. If that be s
o, this implies double standards. It basically means that if you are not powerfu
l enough, let there be no compulsion. So talk peacefully, but having hatred in h
eart for non-Muslims as per Imran 28 and work for your agenda tactfully. But mom
ent you attain power, verse of Sword gets applicable. Then kill the non-believer
s unless they ask for mercy and agree to become Muslims.
This has been testified in history of growth of Islam. Wherever they were powerl
ess they talked of peace and no-compulsion. And moment they got powerful, they s
tarted forcing Islam through threat of sword.
Even in history of Quran, no-compulsion verse was revealed when Muhammad was sti
ll trying to get a set of followers for his mission. And the verse of sword was
allegedly revealed after Islam had already become dominant. We suspect, by this
time, Muhammad would have been imprisoned all false verse inserted in his name.
Or perhaps, after his death, this verse was inserted by his followers who were k
illing each other on might of sword.
In any case, only a very few scholars have started claiming that no-compulsion v
erse is not abrogated, primarily after Islam has been in scrutiny in last few ye
ars after its extremist face came to fore. They represent a minority and no one
dare condemn Muslim countries for having capital punishment for apostasy and deni
grating Islam.
3. Please also note that Islam claims to be the only religion of world. It refus
es to provide status of religion to other belief systems and puts them in foreve
r Hell. Thus the verse on no compulsion in religion only relates to minute differe
nces within Islamic fold and does not refer to non-Muslims.
4. Some Muslim scholars say that only religions are Islam, Christianity and Juda
ism and Islam is the only true one among them. So perhaps some terrorists may sp
are Christians and Jews as per this verse, but idolators like Hindus are for sur
e not under purview of this verse. This is evident from history where Islam was
spread in India, merely on force of sword after killing and rapes of crores. The
y say Hitler performed largest genocide. But if one looks into deeds of each of
the barbaric Muslim looter from Muhammad Bin Qasim to Babur to Akbar to Aurangze
b to Tipu Sultan, each of them had been miles ahead of Hitler in brutality with
added flavor of sexual perversion amounting to rape and sexual punishments.
5. As per Zakir Terrorist Naik, if a country follows Islamic law (and Islamic law
is best law as per Him, since islam is best religion!), then it is justfied to k
ill an apostate as per Holy Quran! Watch this video:
Here is another:
In fact, Zakir Naik quotes from Quran to claim that Islam alone is religion! Hen
ce the concept of no-compulsion is valid only for Muslims!
For more on this subject also review http://www.danielpipes.org/2110/the-issue-o
f-compulsion-in-religion-islam-is-what-its
I appeal to all Muslims and non-Muslims alike to come out of trap of such an inh
uman ideology. Neither is there any evidence of Quran available today being actu
ally a work of Muhammad, nor is it a book which stands anywhere on parameters of
human rights, tolerance, peace and rationality. It remains a book written by ba
rbarians for a barbaric society that is no way applicable today. It is the only
book on earth where God is supposed to have revised and canceled his own previou
s message causing bulk of Quran to be abrogated. There is nothing new in Quran t
hat is not already there in Vedas or other ancient texts. Belief in modern Quran
is based basically on blind belief on imaginary stories that provide no evidenc
e or logic to be true. And blind belief can only breed intolerance.
The evil designs of these fanatics is clear. They will showcase Islam as peacefu
l and friendly and tolerant and go all extent to prove this when they are not in
majority. The moment their power increases, they will start showing their true
face and start applying verse of Sword. This is how they plundered India and res
t of the world. This is how Islam contributes to almost entire supply of terrori
sm today. This is how any peaceful place in world becomes violent as Muslim popu
lation rises above a minimum level. At least Hindus should be aware of their evi
l designs. This is how they grabbed Pakistan and Bangladesh and became 20% of In
dian population at least. Hindus have been having their sisters, daughters and m
others raped by barbaric looters shouting Allah-Hu-Akbar for 1000 years and its
high time they start understanding true meaning of no-compulsion. An amnesiac pe
rson who enjoys feeding milk to snakes despite being bitten innumerable times, i
s bound to be killed one day.
The worst victims of this blinded intolerant cult are those innocent Muslims who
cannot get out of its clutches due to fear of death and repression, and can als
o not gain trust of rest of the world due to misdeeds of terrorists and extremis
ts who predominantly hail from Islam in last 1400 years. I appeal to them to com
e to the true original Vedic dharma the first and only religion for humanity, wh
ich is beyond barriers of caste and race, has no superstitions and only demand b
elief in path of truth. Even truth is defined not as blind dogma in any book inc
luding even the Vedas. Truth implies adopting what is best for self and world as
per one s best understanding and putting all efforts to enhance this understandin
g to best of one s abilities and intent. For more details, visit Vedic religion in
brief (Vedic Religion in brief) Also note that this Vedic religion was the orig
inal religion of forefathers of almost all Muslims in India, Pakistan, Banglades
h who were forced to convert either on threat of sword, or deceit or a stupid ca
ste system that was never part of Vedic religion. Also note that Vedic Dharma do
es not mean idol worship. It means La-Ilaha-Illallah (There is none else but All
ah) removing any association with any Muhammad. Vedas worship a shapeless, omnip
resent, perfect, timeless, kind, just, flawless, all-powerful Ishwar/Allah who n
ever takes birth, never alters his eternal laws and acts only for our benefits.
May the true religion of no-compulsion prevail and let all false dogmas be elimi
nated.
Please Contact us if you are keen to know more and come back to the original and
only true tolerant Vedic Dharma.
Addendum: As with other articles, all criticisms are directed to version of Isla
m as presented by fanatic mindsets like Zakir Naik, and their followers. It is n
ot directed towards a host of minor sects and ideologies in Islam which themselv
es face lot of atrocity for their beliefs. Some of them are:
Hashamiya / Taraqibiyah: They Predicate a body to Allah and also allege Prophet
(pbuh) of disobedience to Allah.
Khazimiyah: They believe Allah loves men of all faiths even if one has been disb
eliever most of his life.
Nazzamiyah: Followers of abu-Ishaq Ibrahim ibn-Saiyar. They do not believe in th
e miraculous nature of the Holy Quran nor do they believe the miracles of Holy P
rophet (pbuh) like splitting the moon.
Ibriyah: They believe that Holy Prophet (pbuh) was a wise man but not a prophet.
Fikriyya: They believe that doing Dhikr and Fikr (Remembering and thinking about
Allah) is better than worship.
Tanasikhiya: They believe in the re-incarnation of soul.
Ahadiyah: They believe in the Fardh (obligations) in faith but deny the sunnah.
Ammaliyah: They believe that faith for one is what he/she sincerely practices.
Hujjatiya: They do not believe in the punishment for deeds on the grounds that b
ecause everything is determined so whatever one does s/he is not responsible for
it.
Lafziyah: They believe that Quran is not the word of God but only its meaning an
d essence is the word of God. Words of Quran are just the words of narrator.

Zakir Naik the mentor of terrorists

I am often asked why I single out Zakir Naik and focus so much on him. Yes, I ag
ree to do so. Almost all adverse references to Islam on my site actually refer t
o the brand of Islam that Zakir Naik and his followers preach. There may be inte
llectual differences with other sects and religions also and that is even desira
ble among scholars so as to understand truth better. With them even arguments an
d debates are exactly the same as what happens between different members of our
family. But Zakir Naik is one person who is one of the greatest threats to human
ity today. I would put him higher than Osama Bin Laden as a terrorist because wh
ile Osama conducts terrorist acts himself, likes of Zakir Naik act as breeders o
f terrorism to give birth of Osama Bin Ladens of tomorrow. It is a matter of sha
me and foolishness that such psychopath anti-socials are allowed to propagate th
eir hatred in India.
We have already exposed virtually all his arguments and ideologies in various po
sts in this site. We have shown his blatant double standards and shamelessness.
In this article, we shall see why and how Zakir Naik is a terrorist. I shall add
ress him Terrorist Naik henceforth.
1. Zakir Naik would never ever condemn Osama Bin Laden. He would simply say he h
as not met him so he doesn t know if he is terrorist or not!
- Now why is meeting necessary to know about Osama? Are they supposed to get int
o some secretive/private acts to know each other better?
- How many people on whom Terrorist Naik comments freely has he actually met? He
says Hitler killed largest number of people in history. While this is a wrong f
act and Muslim invaders of India (from Qasim to Khilji to Tughlaqs to Babur to A
kbar to Aurengzeb to Muslim League etc) have each killed and raped and sodomized
a larger number of innocents, has Zakir actually met Hitler to comment on his t
errorism? He says that all the greatest terrorism acts of last several centuries
were done by non-Muslims as per some website best known to him. But has Zakir m
et those people to comment on them?
- Zakir blames it all on media and says no one knows the truth. But in that case
, even all other events he comments upon are also media reported. The exaggerate
d claims of Gujarat Massacre in 2001 were also media reported. Why does he so ea
sily believe in them then?
- In final defense, Zakir says that if Osama is terrorizing America a terrorist
nation he is with Osama and appeals all Muslims to be a terrorist to scare other
terrorists! Now what proof does Zakir have to conclude that America is a terror
ist?
- Zakir will never even utter that if Osama conducted 911 as indicated in media,
then he considers Osama to be among the worst sinners! He would simply say I do
n t know.
- Zakir conveniently ignores host of interviews that Osama himself gave to procl
aim his terrorist designs! But he is convinced that America is a terrorist! Does
he have insiders in CIA or White House? No wonder, that may also be true. After
all attacks like 911 are implausible without involvement of insiders, as Zakir
himself acknowledges!
Here is a popular video on his stand on Osama. Most of you must have already wat
ched this, but those who haven t, check it out and google for more such videos fro
m Terrorist Naik.
His summary is clear If Osama is with Quran manual of terrorism he is with him,
even if whole world is against him.
The reasons are obvious as even other Islamic scholars have presented. Unless th
ere are spurious sources of funds, one cannot become such a lavish preacher! We
shall see it in another video embedded in this post.
2. Zakir has unusually very clear views on status of non-Muslims in Muslim count
ries. He says:
- Non-Muslims should be prohibited from propagating their religion in Muslim cou
ntries because this is against Shariat and Quran
- He however vehemently defends that Muslims should be allowed to freely propaga
te Islam in non-Muslim countries. His logic is two-fold: a. Islam is the only re
ligious scripture on earth to claim that it is the best and only book of Allah.
Since other books are not so shamelessly self-glorifying, it is their loss! So as
per Islam, muslim countries cannot entertain non-Muslim ideologies. But since ot
her countries do not have such scriptures, they should allow Islam!. Logic b. Co
untries like India are secular countries and hence they cannot prohibit propagat
ion of Islam. He also states that Islamic law is better than secularism!
- He goes further and says that had non-Muslims been so sure about their religio
ns, they would have already prohibited propagation of other religions in their c
ountries!!
Thus it is win-win-win for Muslims:
- If say India becomes a Hindu country, then no book of religion says prohibit o
thers from freedom of expression. Hence Muslims should be allowed to preach
- Since India is a secular country, by law Muslims are free to preach
- If tomorrow Muslims have a majority in India and implement Shariat, then non-M
uslims are prohibited from preaching, hence ONLY Muslims should be allowed to pr
each!
Can there be a greater height of fanaticism? If you think NO, you are wrong! Sim
ply read on.
3. Zakir clearly supports that muslims who leave Islam or turn apostate should
be murdered in Islamic country. His logic is hilariously fanatic:
- Shariat and Islamic law are the best laws.
- As per Shariat, a person who rejects Islam is a traitor
- In many countries, traitors who give secrets of nation to outsiders are punish
ed to death for being traitor. By same logic Islam also punishes apostates with
death sentence.
- Since non-Muslim countries are not following Shariat and are secular, they can
not give such punishments. So in these countries, one is free to become Muslims.
But the opposite cannot happen in Muslim countries!
I have rarely heard a more terrorism inspiring speech being conducted in police
protection! See how foolishly he compares leaving Islam with selling secrets to
enemies. This example itself shows clearly the mindset of Muslim clergies:
- What they propagate openly is not true Islam. One would come to know of true I
slam only after conversion when secrets would be unravelled.
- These secrets are so dangerous that if known to public, it can have damaging i
mpact for Islam. So traitor has to be quickly killed!
- The concept of No compulsion in Religion is applicable only in non-Muslim domina
ted areas. The moment there is Muslim majority, Islam is like a crime mafia. One
can enter, but cannot leave without leaving his life as well!
Watch these videos to check out yourself in detail!
Dear non-Muslim fellow kafirs. The designs of fanatics like Zakir Naik are very
clear. As per Islam, they have to propagate Islam by all means. The strategies a
re as follows:
- If in minority or powerless, emphasize that Islam is only about peace and love
. Highlight incomplete verses or cancelled verses to showcase how there is no co
mpulsion or violence in Islam.
- Even if that demands falsehood, it is acceptable under concept of Taqiah. You
can even deny doing Taqiah or fraud.
- Never ever condemn a fellow Muslim, even if he be a terrorist like Osama. Simp
ly pretend ignorance
- Meanwhile work hands in hands, and get funds from spurious sources for lavish
publicty
- Do massive conversions at ground level through mixture of all above means
- Work with time-bound target of conversions to increase majority and meanwhile
also start preparing for armed struggle
- As and when opportunity comes, strike and attack and terrorize
- When you gain power, force one-way conversions, have death sentence for aposta
sy and rape and loot like Muslim invaders have done for 1000 years.
Remember, Islam of Zakir Naik et al is not only a religion, it has less to do wi
th spiritualism and more to do with global political power capture agenda. Thus
it acts as a terrorist manual ably supported by other texts like Hadiths and Taf
seers. All non-Muslims should start preparing to combat the present and future t
hreats from such fanatics that are inevitable. And all sensible Muslims should w
ork on two paths -
a. Reject Islam and adopt original religion of Vedas so as to get rid of both th
e stigma of being associated with such fanatics, and witness what a truly spirit
ual and free life is all about. This will also go a long way in thwarting the ev
il designs of fanatics like Zakir Naik and Osama. After all it is a number game
for them!
b. Oppose Zakir Naik as much as they can. Oppose terrorists as much as they can
. For example:
While most of these criticisms themselves are politically motivated and perhaps
ways to fool public at large, genuine condemnation should come through conversio
n out of Islam as mark of protest against view of Islam supporting murder of apo
states.
This is a question of our survival. We did not have bombs and modern weapon for
1000 years and hence we survived plunder of Muslim looters. But now it shall bec
ome a do-or-die situation if we do not rise up and start creating awareness abou
t this impending danger. Many young terrorists consider Zakir their role model.
Let everyone of us work together to thwart the designs of these false terror pro
phets and the entire mafia that is hiding behind his facade.
Let us all work together to expose fanatics and drive in society tolerance, peac
e and equality! Lets do it very quickly. In Peace TV, it was announced in 2008 t
hat they would go all way to make India a Darul Islam in next 5 years to fulfill
a 1000 years old dream. The work has already begun on all fronts very aggressiv
ely and meticulously. I do not know, how far this entire terrorists-preachers-co
rrupts-sickulars-traitors chain of mafia goes and what all do they influence tod
ay. But I know that unless we get into acts quickly and smartly and emphatically
, our survival would be under question mark very soon.
May truth and peace prevail! And very quickly!