MRA&amp FA 251,341

qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui
MRA&FA
opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgh
jklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvb
PROJECT ON
nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer
MRA AND FACTOR
tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas
ANALYSIS
dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx
Assignment #2
cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq
9/11/2010
By: Shakti Singh Rathore251
wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio
Birendra Singh 341
MBA CoreII Yr
pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj
klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn
mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty
uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf
ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc
vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrty
uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf
ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc
vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqw
ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiop
MRA&FA 2010
DATA DESCRIPTION
Data File is Share.Sav
The data included the various variables governing the Share Price of the equity. The various Variables
data has been taken from the net Randomly for various stocks of the Companies. The variables EPS, P/E,
Operating Profit Margin, Net Profit Margin, Dividend/Share(Rs), Return On Net Worth and Current Ratio
are the variables under Research to find out a relationship between the Share Price of the Stock and the
independent variables. The variables are important parameters in order to judge the performance of the
company and are a good indicator of the overall profile and valuation of the Company.
The data is taken for 30 Companies and subsequently the research is done on the data. The sample size is
30 which comprises of the Companies ranging from the small Cap to large Cap. The file name is
Share.xls.
2 | Page
MRA&FA 2010
MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS
NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

EPS(Rs/yr) P/E Current Ratio
N 33 33 33
a,,b
Normal Parameters Mean 28.2309 28.4991 2.271818
Std. Deviation 32.58242 22.95019 1.9324053
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .213 .201 .167
Positive .209 .201 .167
Negative -.213 -.168 -.153
Kolmogorov-Smirnov 1.222 1.155 .957
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .101 .139 .319
a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data.

DebttoEquity Assets Operating
ratio TurnOver Ratio Profit Margin
N 33 33 33
Normal Parametersa,,b Mean 1.596667 17.1227 .275842
Std. Deviation 2.5634836 55.64674 .2088116
Positive .278 .386 .184
Negative -.267 -.380 -.113
Kolmogorov-Smirnov 1.597 2.217 1.057
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .012 .000 .213
3 | Page
MRA&FA 2010

Net Profit Dividend/Share Return On Net
Margin (Rs) Worth
N 33 33 33
Normal Parametersa,,b Mean .164561 6.81939 .195124
Std. Deviation .1069685 7.364977 .1011862
Positive .086 .173 .104
Negative -.066 -.177 -.056
Kolmogorov-Smirnov .494 1.018 .600
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .968 .251 .865

EBDIT(RsCr) Price(Rs)
N 33 33
a,,b
Normal Parameters Mean 4490.848788 618.4090909
Std. Deviation 1.1184828E4 6.75112740E2
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .346 .234
Positive .303 .234
Negative -.346 -.193
Kolmogorov-Smirnov 1.988 1.346
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .053
RESULT INTERPRETATION:
We see from the output that all of the variables (except EBDIT, Debt/eqty ratio and ATR) are
normally distributed as the two tailed level of significance is high enough (alpha=0.05) to accept
the null hypothesis. So the data of all the variables (except EBDIT, Debt/eqty ratio and ATR)
follow a normal distribution approx. That means that all of the variables (except EBDIT,
4 | Page
MRA&FA 2010
Debt/eqty ratio and ATR) can be tested for ANOVA and can be applied to Regression Model.
This has tested our first assumption for linear regression.
This implies we need to find a MRA model of Price of a Share with the given independent
variables (except EBDIT, Debt/eqty ratio and ATR).
So the Assumption of normality of independent as well as dependent variables from KS test is
valid for the independent and dependent variables as Price, EPS, P/E, Operating Profit Margin,
Net Profit Margin, Dividend/Share(Rs), Return On Net Worth and Current Ratio.
In next step Run Linear Regression for the above variables with Price as dependent variables and
rest as the independent variables.
Regression With Enter Method
The descriptive statistics provide overall distributions of variables.

Descriptive Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
Price(Rs) 618.4090909 6.75112740E2 33
EPS(Rs/yr) 28.2309 32.58242 33
P/E 28.4991 22.95019 33
Current Ratio 2.271818 1.9324053 33
Operating Profit Margin .275842 .2088116 33
Net Profit Margin .164561 .1069685 33
Dividend/Share(Rs) 6.81939 7.364977 33
Return On Net Worth .195124 .1011862 33
Correlations
Price(Rs) EPS(Rs/yr) P/E Current Ratio
Pearson Correlation Price(Rs) 1.000 .851 .079 -.173
EPS(Rs/yr) .851 1.000 -.219 -.302
P/E .079 -.219 1.000 .544
Current Ratio -.173 -.302 .544 1.000
5 | Page
MRA&FA 2010
Operating Profit Margin -.123 -.142 .290 .466

Net Profit Margin .006 -.043 -.035 .010
Dividend/Share(Rs) .860 .783 -.011 -.149
Return On Net Worth .268 .267 -.319 -.458
Sig. (1-tailed) Price(Rs) . .000 .331 .168
EPS(Rs/yr) .000 . .111 .044
P/E .331 .111 . .001
Current Ratio .168 .044 .001 .
Operating Profit Margin .248 .215 .051 .003
Net Profit Margin .487 .406 .424 .479
Dividend/Share(Rs) .000 .000 .476 .204
Return On Net Worth .066 .067 .035 .004
N Price(Rs) 33 33 33 33
EPS(Rs/yr) 33 33 33 33
P/E 33 33 33 33
Current Ratio 33 33 33 33
Operating Profit Margin 33 33 33 33
Net Profit Margin 33 33 33 33
Dividend/Share(Rs) 33 33 33 33
Return On Net Worth 33 33 33 33
Correlations
Operating Net Profit Dividend/Share
Profit Margin Margin (Rs)
Pearson Correlation Price(Rs) -.123 .006 .860
EPS(Rs/yr) -.142 -.043 .783
P/E .290 -.035 -.011
Current Ratio .466 .010 -.149
Operating Profit Margin 1.000 .641 -.102
Net Profit Margin .641 1.000 -.007
Dividend/Share(Rs) -.102 -.007 1.000
6 | Page
MRA&FA 2010
Return On Net Worth -.036 .259 .429

Sig. (1-tailed) Price(Rs) .248 .487 .000
EPS(Rs/yr) .215 .406 .000
P/E .051 .424 .476
Current Ratio .003 .479 .204
Operating Profit Margin . .000 .286
Net Profit Margin .000 . .485
Dividend/Share(Rs) .286 .485 .
Return On Net Worth .421 .073 .006
N Price(Rs) 33 33 33
EPS(Rs/yr) 33 33 33
P/E 33 33 33
Current Ratio 33 33 33
Operating Profit Margin 33 33 33
Net Profit Margin 33 33 33
Dividend/Share(Rs) 33 33 33
Return On Net Worth 33 33 33
Correlations
Return On Net
Worth
Pearson Correlation Price(Rs) .268
EPS(Rs/yr) .267
P/E -.319
Current Ratio -.458
Operating Profit Margin -.036
Net Profit Margin .259
Dividend/Share(Rs) .429
Return On Net Worth 1.000
Sig. (1-tailed) Price(Rs) .066
EPS(Rs/yr) .067
P/E .035
7 | Page
MRA&FA 2010
Current Ratio .004

Operating Profit Margin .421
Return On Net Worth .
N Price(Rs) 33
EPS(Rs/yr) 33
P/E 33
Current Ratio 33
Operating Profit Margin 33
Net Profit Margin 33
Dividend/Share(Rs) 33
Return On Net Worth 33
Above Part and Partial Coorelations matrix is helpful in understanding the relationship between
independent and dependent variables. If the independent and dependent variables are highly interrelated
then this is refer to as Multicollinearity. The Regression Equation is valid only if there is no high
Multicollinearity. The above table found variables relationship among all the variables with each other.
The Pearson Correlation Coefficient is less than 0.80 between all the dependent variables taken two at a
time. So there appears no problem of multicollinearity to affect the regression model. All the dependent
variable have a Pearson Correlation of less than 0.7 except the EPS & Dividend per share correlation
which is .783. Also there are no very high correlations of more than .9, which might have made our entire
regression analysis unreliable for interpreting the regression coefficients.
Variables Entered/Removed
Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
8 | Page
MRA&FA 2010
1 Return On Net . Enter

Worth,
Operating
Profit Margin,
EPS(Rs/yr),
P/E, Current
Ratio, Net
Profit Margin,
Dividend/Share
(Rs)a
a. All requested variables entered.
The Above table shows that the method selected was Enter method without conveying any significant
meaning.
Method of entering the variables is enter.

Model Summaryb
Adjusted R Std. Error of

Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .936a .877 .842 2.68245955E2
a. Predictors: (Constant), Return On Net Worth, Operating Profit
Margin, EPS(Rs/yr), P/E, Current Ratio, Net Profit Margin,
Dividend/Share(Rs)
b. Dependent Variable: Price(Rs)
The coefficient of multiple determination is .877 which is high,
therefore 87.7% of the variation in the share Price(dependent
variable) is explained by the seven independent variables Return
On Net Worth, Operating Profit Margin, EPS (Rs/yr), P/E,
Current Ratio, Net Profit Margin, Dividend/Share (Rs). The
regression model would be significant to make predictions since
the value of R2 is close to 1.
Model Summaryb
Model Change Statistics
9 | Page
MRA&FA 2010
R Square
Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change Durbin-Watson
1 .877 25.385 7 25 .000 1.856
The Durbin-Watson coefficient is 1.856 is between the acceptable range of 1.5-2.5. So there is no
problem of autocollinearity of the independent variables. Error terms of any two variables are not
correlated with one another i.e. the correlation between any two of them is zero. Thus this assumption
that there is no serial correlation among residual terms is valid.
ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 1.279E7 7 1826567.635 25.385 .000a
Residual 1798897.313 25 71955.893
Total 1.458E7 32
a. Predictors: (Constant), Return On Net Worth, Operating Profit Margin, EPS(Rs/yr),
P/E, Current Ratio, Net Profit Margin, Dividend/Share(Rs)
The Anova table indicates whether the model is significant or not. From above Anova test at .05 level of
significance we see that Sig value=.00<00.05(level of significance), So there exists enough evidence to
conclude that the independent variables are useful or significant in predicting the Price of a
share(dependent variable). Therefore the Regression model is significant.
Coefficients a
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) -152.891 187.232 -.817 .422
EPS(Rs/yr) 11.945 2.730 .576 4.376 .000
P/E 7.797 2.640 .265 2.954 .007
10 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Current Ratio -6.138 37.878 -.018 -.162 .873

Operating Profit Margin -561.439 380.864 -.174 -1.474 .153
Net Profit Margin 1024.625 659.232 .162 1.554 .133
Dividend/Share(Rs) 37.149 12.822 .405 2.897 .008
Return On Net Worth -211.518 660.668 -.032 -.320 .752
a. Dependent Variable: Price(Rs)
The table gives the regression coefficients for each of the variables and their significance. The regression
equation can be framed as:
Price= -152.891+11.945*EPS+7.797*P/E-6.138*CurrentRatio-
561.439*OperatingprofitMargin+1024.625*NetProfitMargin+37.149*Dividend/Share-211.518*Return on
Net Worth.
The above Equation indicates that:
i) Average Price per share increases by 11.945Rs for every 1 Rs increase in EPS of a share
when all other variables are held constant.
ii) Average Price per share increases by 7.797Rs for every 1 unit increase in P/E ratio of a share
when all other variables are held constant.
iii) Average Price per share decreases by 6.138Rs for every 1 unit increase in Current Ratio of a
Company when all other variables are held constant.
iv) Average Price per share decreases by 5.61439Rs for every 1% increase in Operating profit
Margin of a Company when all other variables are held constant.
v) Average Price per share increases by 10.24625Rs for every 1% increase in Net profit Margin
of a Company when all other variables are held constant.
vi) Average Price per share increases by 37.149Rs for every 1Rs increase in Dividend/Share of a
Company when all other variables are held constant.
vii) Average Price per share decreases by 2.11518 Rs for every 1% increase in Return on Net
Worth of a Company when all other variables are held constant.
Coefficients a
95.0% Confidence Interval for
B Correlations
Model Lower Bound Upper Bound Zero-order Partial Part
11 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
1 (Constant) -538.503 232.721

EPS(Rs/yr) 6.323 17.567 .851 .659 .307
P/E 2.360 13.234 .079 .509 .207
Current Ratio -84.150 71.873 -.173 -.032 -.011
Operating Profit Margin -1345.842 222.964 -.123 -.283 -.104
Net Profit Margin -333.089 2382.340 .006 .297 .109
Dividend/Share(Rs) 10.741 63.557 .860 .501 .203
Return On Net Worth -1572.190 1149.153 .268 -.064 -.022
From above table we infer that
i) We are 95% Confident that for every single Re increase of EPS the Average price per
Share increases between the interval 6.323-17.567 Rs.
ii) We are 95% Confident that for every single unit increase of P/E the Average price per
Share increases between the interval 2.360-13.234 Rs.
iii) We are 95% Confident that for every single unit increase of Current Ratio the Average
price per Share decreases/increases between the interval -84.150-71.873 Rs
iv) We are 95% Confident that for every single percent increase of Operating Profit Margin
the Average price per Share decreases/increases between the interval -13.45842-2.22964
Rs
v) We are 95% Confident that for every single percent increase of Net Profit Margin the
Average price per Share decreases/increases between the interval -3.33089-23.8234 Rs.
vi) We are 95% Confident that for every single Re increase of Dividend Per Share the
Average price per Share increases between the interval 10.741-63.557 Rs
vii) We are 95% Confident that for every single percent increase of Return on Net Worth the
Average price per Share decreases/increases between the interval -15.72190-11.49153 Rs.
Coefficients a
Collinearity Statistics
Model Tolerance VIF
1 EPS(Rs/yr) .284 3.518
P/E .613 1.632
Current Ratio .420 2.383
Operating Profit Margin .356 2.813
12 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Net Profit Margin .452 2.211

Dividend/Share(Rs) .252 3.966
Return On Net Worth .503 1.987
Since none of the predictor variables has a variance inflation factor (VIF) greater than five (all VIFs are
Are less than 5 or Tolerance>0.20), there are no apparent multicollinearity problems; in other words, there
is no variable in the model that is measuring the same relationship/quantity as is measured by another
variable or group of variables.
Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Variance Proportions
Dimen Condition
Model sion Eigenvalue Index (Constant) EPS(Rs/yr) P/E Current Ratio
1 1 5.732 1.000 .00 .00 .00 .00
2 1.116 2.266 .00 .05 .02 .03
3 .494 3.406 .00 .01 .11 .06
4 .256 4.728 .03 .08 .11 .03
5 .167 5.859 .04 .00 .54 .37
6 .127 6.730 .09 .39 .05 .05
7 .076 8.691 .01 .01 .00 .08
8 .032 13.293 .84 .46 .16 .38
Dimen Operating Net Profit Dividend/Share Return On Net
Model sion Profit Margin Margin (Rs) Worth
1 1 .00 .00 .00 .00
2 .01 .00 .03 .00
3 .02 .08 .02 .03
4 .12 .02 .00 .12
5 .02 .05 .01 .03
6 .01 .00 .43 .04
13 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
7 .63 .75 .04 .16

8 .18 .10 .47 .62
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N
Predicted Value -26.8449707 2.7984128 618.4090909 6.32108907E2 33
E3
Residual - 7.4374310 .00000000 2.37098167E2 33
3.60662933E2 3E2
Std. Predicted Value -1.021 3.449 .000 1.000 33
Std. Residual -1.345 2.773 .000 .884 33
The mean of the Standardized Residuals is Zero.
Charts
14 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
15 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
From Above graphs it is clear that the points are close to the linear diagonal line with no substantial or
systematic departures and thus the standardized residuals are approximately normally distributed. So this
satisfies the assumption of Normal Distribution of residuals with conditional mean zero and
variance. So our another assumption for MRA is found to be true and Our Share Price Regression
Model is valid.
16 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
The plot of residual against the all the Standardized values of Predictor variable is somewhat showing the
constancy of residuals across all the set of Predicted values. This plot of Residuals against the predicted
dependent values is not showing any particular pattern, so the all the Residual terms are independent of
each of the standardized Predicted values. This validates the assumption of Homoscedasticity. So our
Regression Model is valid.
17 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
18 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
19 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
20 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
21 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
22 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
23 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
The Price is showing linear relationship in majority of the cases with the independent variables. So
our assumption of linearity is also verifies and the Regression model is valid.
MODEL1:
Price= -152.891+11.945*EPS+7.797*P/E-6.138*CurrentRatio-
561.439*OperatingprofitMargin+1024.625*NetProfitMargin+37.149*Dividend/Share-
211.518*Return on Net Worth.
24 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Regression with Step-Wise Method
Descriptive Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
Price(Rs) 618.4090909 6.75112740E2 33
EPS(Rs/yr) 28.2309 32.58242 33
P/E 28.4991 22.95019 33
Current Ratio 2.271818 1.9324053 33
Operating Profit Margin .275842 .2088116 33
Net Profit Margin .164561 .1069685 33
Dividend/Share(Rs) 6.81939 7.364977 33
Return On Net Worth .195124 .1011862 33
Correlations
Price(Rs) EPS(Rs/yr) P/E Current Ratio
Pearson Correlation Price(Rs) 1.000 .851 .079 -.173
EPS(Rs/yr) .851 1.000 -.219 -.302
P/E .079 -.219 1.000 .544
Current Ratio -.173 -.302 .544 1.000
Operating Profit Margin -.123 -.142 .290 .466
Net Profit Margin .006 -.043 -.035 .010
Dividend/Share(Rs) .860 .783 -.011 -.149
Return On Net Worth .268 .267 -.319 -.458
Sig. (1-tailed) Price(Rs) . .000 .331 .168
EPS(Rs/yr) .000 . .111 .044
P/E .331 .111 . .001
25 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Current Ratio .168 .044 .001 .

Operating Profit Margin .248 .215 .051 .003
Dividend/Share(Rs) .000 .000 .476 .204
Return On Net Worth .066 .067 .035 .004
N Price(Rs) 33 33 33 33
EPS(Rs/yr) 33 33 33 33
P/E 33 33 33 33
Current Ratio 33 33 33 33
Operating Profit Margin 33 33 33 33
Net Profit Margin 33 33 33 33
Dividend/Share(Rs) 33 33 33 33
Return On Net Worth 33 33 33 33
Correlations
Operating Net Profit Dividend/Share
Profit Margin Margin (Rs)
Pearson Correlation Price(Rs) -.123 .006 .860
EPS(Rs/yr) -.142 -.043 .783
P/E .290 -.035 -.011
Current Ratio .466 .010 -.149
Operating Profit Margin 1.000 .641 -.102
Net Profit Margin .641 1.000 -.007
Dividend/Share(Rs) -.102 -.007 1.000
Return On Net Worth -.036 .259 .429
Sig. (1-tailed) Price(Rs) .248 .487 .000
EPS(Rs/yr) .215 .406 .000
P/E .051 .424 .476
Current Ratio .003 .479 .204
Operating Profit Margin . .000 .286
Net Profit Margin .000 . .485
Dividend/Share(Rs) .286 .485 .
26 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Return On Net Worth .421 .073 .006

N Price(Rs) 33 33 33
EPS(Rs/yr) 33 33 33
P/E 33 33 33
Current Ratio 33 33 33
Operating Profit Margin 33 33 33
Net Profit Margin 33 33 33
Dividend/Share(Rs) 33 33 33
Return On Net Worth 33 33 33
Correlations
Return On Net
Worth
Pearson Correlation Price(Rs) .268
EPS(Rs/yr) .267
P/E -.319
Current Ratio -.458
Operating Profit Margin -.036
Return On Net Worth 1.000
Sig. (1-tailed) Price(Rs) .066
EPS(Rs/yr) .067
P/E .035
Current Ratio .004
Operating Profit Margin .421
Return On Net Worth .
N Price(Rs) 33
EPS(Rs/yr) 33
P/E 33
27 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Current Ratio 33
Operating Profit Margin 33
Net Profit Margin 33
Dividend/Share(Rs) 33
Return On Net Worth 33
The above table found variables relationship among all the variables with each other. The Pearson
Correlation Coefficient is less than 0.80 between all the dependent variables taken two at a time. So there
appears no problem of multicollinearity to affect the regression model. All the dependent variable have a
Pearson Correlation of less than 0.7 except the EPS/Dividend per share correlation which is .783.
Variables Entered/Removeda
Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
1 Dividend/Share . Stepwise
(Rs) (Criteria:
Probability-of-
F-to-enter <=
.050,
Probability-of-
F-to-remove >=
.100).
2 EPS(Rs/yr) . Stepwise
(Criteria:
Probability-of-
F-to-enter <=
.050,
Probability-of-
F-to-remove >=
.100).
28 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
3 P/E . Stepwise
(Criteria:
Probability-of-
F-to-enter <=
.050,
Probability-of-
F-to-remove >=
.100).
Method of entering the variables is stepwise.
Model Summaryd
Adjusted R Std. Error of

Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .860a .739 .731 3.50422262E2
2 .906b .820 .808 2.95576431E2
c
3 .927 .859 .844 2.66399216E2
a. Predictors: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs)
b. Predictors: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs), EPS(Rs/yr)
c. Predictors: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs), EPS(Rs/yr), P/E
d. Dependent Variable: Price(Rs)
It’s a stepwise method will give all the regression models that
are significant at each step. The last model is generally the best
model with highest adjusted R2. .So, We accept the last model as
it has the highest value of coefficient of multiple determination
R2 and is a better estimate.
The coefficient of multiple determination is .859, therefore
85.9% of the variation in the share Price is explained by the
independent variables EPS (Rs/yr), P/E, Dividend/Share (Rs).
The regression model would be significant to make predictions
since the value of R2 is close to 1.
29 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Model Summaryd
Change Statistics
R Square
Model Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change Durbin-Watson
1 .739 87.773 1 31 .000
2 .081 13.572 1 30 .001
3 .039 7.931 1 29 .009 1.737

The Durbin-Watson coefficient is 1.737 is between the acceptable range of 1.5-2.5. So there is no
problem of autocollinearity of the independent variables. Error terms of any two variables are not
correlated with one another i.e. the correlation between any two of them is zero. Thus this assumption that
there is no serial correlation among residual terms is valid.
ANOVAd
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 1.078E7 1 1.078E7 87.773 .000a
Residual 3806668.619 31 122795.762
Total 1.458E7 32
2 Regression 1.196E7 2 5981953.978 68.470 .000b
Residual 2620962.801 30 87365.427
Total 1.458E7 32
3 Regression 1.253E7 3 4175594.342 58.837 .000c
Residual 2058087.731 29 70968.542
Total 1.458E7 32
a. Predictors: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs)
b. Predictors: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs), EPS(Rs/yr)
c. Predictors: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs), EPS(Rs/yr), P/E
30 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
From above Anova test at .05 level of significance and significance<.05 there exists enough evidence to
conclude that the variables are useful are significant in predicting the Price of a share. Therefore the
Regression model is useful.
Coefficients a
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) 81.040 83.732 .968 .341
2 (Constant) 37.355 71.615 .522 .606
EPS(Rs/yr) 9.506 2.580 .459 3.684 .001
3 (Constant) -149.873 92.660 -1.617 .117
EPS(Rs/yr) 11.857 2.471 .572 4.798 .000
P/E 6.140 2.180 .209 2.816 .009
We accepted the third model.
The table gives the regression coefficients for each of the variables and their significance. The
regression equation can be framed as:
Price=
-149.873+37.917*Dividend/Share+11.857*EPS+6.14*P/E
The above Equation indicates that:
i) Average Price per share increases by 37.917Rs for every 1 Rs increase in
Dividend/Share of a share when all other variables are held constant.
ii) Average Price per share increases by 11.857Rs for every 1 Rs increase in EPS of a
share when all other variables are held constant.
iii) Average Price per share increases by 6.14Rs for every 1 unit increase in P/E of a
share when all other variables are held constant
31 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Coefficients a
95.0% Confidence Interval for
B Correlations
Model Lower Bound Upper Bound Zero-order Partial Part
1 (Constant) -89.732 251.812
2 (Constant) -108.902 183.613
EPS(Rs/yr) 4.236 14.776 .851 .558 .285
3 (Constant) -339.385 39.638
EPS(Rs/yr) 6.803 16.910 .851 .665 .335
P/E 1.681 10.599 .079 .463 .196
From above table we infer that
i) We are 95% Confident that for every single Re increase of Dividend/Share the
Average price per Share increases between the interval 16.099-59.735 Rs.
ii) We are 95% Confident that for every single Re increase of EPS the Average price per
Share increases between the interval 6.803-16.910Rs.
iii) We are 95% Confident that for every single unit increase of P/E ratio the Average
price per Share increases between the interval 1.681-10.599Rs.
Coefficients a
Model Tolerance VIF
1 Dividend/Share(Rs) 1.000 1.000
2 Dividend/Share(Rs) .386 2.589
EPS(Rs/yr) .386 2.589
3 Dividend/Share(Rs) .359 2.783
32 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
EPS(Rs/yr) .342 2.923

P/E .886 1.129
Since none of the predictor variables has a variance inflation factor (VIF) greater than five (all VIFs are
Are less than 5 or Tolerance>0.20), there are no apparent multicollinearity problems; in other words, there
is no variable in the model that is measuring the same relationship/quantity as is measured by another
variable or group of variables.
Excluded Variables d
Partial
Model Beta In t Sig. Correlation
1 EPS(Rs/yr) .459a 3.684 .001 .558
P/E .089a .965 .342 .173
Current Ratio -.046a -.486 .630 -.088
Operating Profit Margin -.036a -.383 .705 -.070
Net Profit Margin .012a .124 .902 .023
Return On Net Worth -.124a -1.230 .228 -.219
2 P/E .209b 2.816 .009 .463
Current Ratio .045b .547 .588 .101
Operating Profit Margin -.007b -.086 .932 -.016
Net Profit Margin .029b .369 .715 .068
Return On Net Worth -.086b -.999 .326 -.182
3 Current Ratio -.077c -.905 .373 -.169
Operating Profit Margin -.066c -.900 .376 -.168
Net Profit Margin .041c .576 .569 .108
Return On Net Worth .006c .072 .943 .014
a. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs)
b. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs), EPS(Rs/yr)
c. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), Dividend/Share(Rs), EPS(Rs/yr), P/E
33 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Excluded Variables d
Minimum
Model Tolerance VIF Tolerance
1 EPS(Rs/yr) .386 2.589 .386
P/E 1.000 1.000 1.000
Current Ratio .978 1.023 .978
Operating Profit Margin .990 1.011 .990
Net Profit Margin 1.000 1.000 1.000
Return On Net Worth .816 1.225 .816
2 P/E .886 1.129 .342
Current Ratio .889 1.125 .351
Net Profit Margin .996 1.004 .385
3 Current Ratio .668 1.496 .335
Net Profit Margin .993 1.007 .340
Dimen Condition
Model sion Eigenvalue Index
1 1 1.685 1.000
2 .315 2.313
2 1 2.489 1.000
34 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
2 .393 2.517
3 .118 4.589
3 1 2.988 1.000
2 .728 2.026
3 .187 3.999
4 .097 5.544
Dimen Dividend/Share
Model sion (Constant) (Rs) EPS(Rs/yr) P/E
1 1 .16 .16
2 .84 .84
2 1 .06 .03 .03
2 .93 .06 .10
3 .01 .91 .87
3 1 .02 .02 .02 .02
2 .03 .04 .08 .22
3 .73 .20 .02 .44
4 .21 .74 .89 .32
E3
Residual - 7.7355230 .00000000 2.53604498E2 33
4.64872833E 7E2
2
Std. Residual -1.745 2.904 .000 .952 33
35 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
E3
Residual - 7.7355230 .00000000 2.53604498E2 33
4.64872833E 7E2
2
Std. Residual -1.745 2.904 .000 .952 33
Charts
36 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
From Above graphs it is clear that the points are close to the linear diagonal line and thus the standardized
residuals are approximately normally distributed. So this satisfies the assumption of Normal Distribution
of with conditional mean zero and variance. So our another assumption for m MRA is found to be true
and Our Share Price Regression Model is valid.
37 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
The plot of residual against the all the Standardized values of Predictor variable is somewhat showing the
constancy of residuals across all the set of Predicted values. This plot of Residuals against the predicted
dependent values is not showing any particular pattern, so the all the Residual terms are independent of
each of the standardized Predicted values. This validates the assumption of Homoscedasticity. So our
Regression Model is valid.
38 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
39 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
The Price is showing linear relationship in majority of the cases with the independent variables. So our
assumption of linearity is also verifies and the Regression model is valid.
40 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
41 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Model2:
Price=
-149.873+37.917*Dividend/Share+11.857*EPS+6.14*P/E
Factor Analysis by Shakti Singh
42 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
FACTOR ANALYSIS
PRINCIPLE COMPONENT ANALYSIS
Correlation Matrix
DebttoEquity
EPS(Rs/yr) P/E CurrentRatio ratio
Correlation EPS(Rs/yr) 1.000 -.219 -.302 .523
P/E -.219 1.000 .544 -.040
CurrentRatio -.302 .544 1.000 -.128
DebttoEquity ratio .523 -.040 -.128 1.000
Assets TurnOver Ratio -.095 .111 .034 .216
Operating Profit -.142 .290 .466 .016
Margin
Net Profit Margin -.043 -.035 .010 -.202
Dividend/Share(Rs) .783 -.011 -.149 .364
Return On NetWorth .267 -.319 -.458 -.221
EBDIT(RsCr) .670 -.151 -.237 .745
Correlation Matrix
Assets
TurnOver Operating Net Profit Dividend/Shar
Ratio Profit Margin Margin e(Rs)
Correlation EPS(Rs/yr) -.095 -.142 -.043 .783
P/E .111 .290 -.035 -.011
CurrentRatio .034 .466 .010 -.149
DebttoEquity ratio .216 .016 -.202 .364
Assets TurnOver Ratio 1.000 -.174 -.322 -.070
Operating Profit -.174 1.000 .641 -.102
Margin
Net Profit Margin -.322 .641 1.000 -.007
Dividend/Share(Rs) -.070 -.102 -.007 1.000
Return On NetWorth -.126 -.036 .259 .429
EBDIT(RsCr) -.066 -.048 -.032 .577
Correlation Matrix
43 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Return On EBDIT(RsCr
NetWorth )
Correlation EPS(Rs/yr) .267 .670
P/E -.319 -.151
CurrentRatio -.458 -.237
DebttoEquity ratio -.221 .745
Assets TurnOver Ratio -.126 -.066
Operating Profit -.036 -.048
Margin
Net Profit Margin .259 -.032
Dividend/Share(Rs) .429 .577
Return On NetWorth 1.000 -.041
EBDIT(RsCr) -.041 1.000
The above matrix is a correlation matrix. The PCA can be carried out if the correlation matrix for the
variables contains at least two correlations of .3 or greater. We see from above that there are more than
two correlations of more than 0.3 so we can carry out PCA.
KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling .532
Adequacy.
Bartlett's Test of Approx. Chi-Square 156.183
Sphericity df 45
Sig. .000
KMO Bartlett’s measure of Sampling Adequacy is an index used to test appropriateness of the factor
analysis.The minimum required valu of KMO is 0.5. The above table shows that the index for the data is
.532 and the chi-square statistics is significant(<0.05). This means that the PCA(Principle Component
Analysis is appropriate for this data.
Communalities
Initial Extraction
EPS(Rs/yr) 1.000 .820
P/E 1.000 .542
44 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
CurrentRatio 1.000 .722
DebttoEquity ratio 1.000 .763
Assets TurnOver Ratio 1.000 .362
Operating Profit 1.000 .820
Margin
Net Profit Margin 1.000 .770
Dividend/Share(Rs) 1.000 .687
Return On NetWorth 1.000 .670
EBDIT(RsCr) 1.000 .809
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
External Communalities are estimates of the variance in each variable accounted for by each component.
The communalities in this table are all high, which indicates that the extracted components explains the
variables well. If any communalities are very low in a principal components extraction, then we may need
to extract another component.
Total Variance Explained
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 3.139 31.388 31.388 3.139 31.388 31.388
2 1.946 19.462 50.850 1.946 19.462 50.850
3 1.878 18.784 69.634 1.878 18.784 69.634
4 .988 9.876 79.510
5 .845 8.452 87.962
6 .451 4.509 92.471
7 .303 3.031 95.502
8 .224 2.237 97.738
9 .130 1.304 99.042
10 .096 .958 100.000

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Component Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2.841 28.410 28.410
2 2.204 22.037 50.447
3 1.919 19.186 69.634
45 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

The above table gives the total variance explained. The table gives the total variance contributed by each
component. We see that the percentage of total variance contributed by first component is 31.388, by
second component is 19.462 and by the third component is 18.784. It is also clear from this table that
there are a total of three distinct components for given set of variables
46 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
The scree plot gives the number of components against the eigen values and helps to determine the
optimal number of components. The variable having a steep slope indicates that the good percentage of
total variance is explained by that component, hence the component is justified. The shallow slope
indicates that the contribution of total variance is less and the component is not justified.
IN the above plot, the first and third components have steep slope and second component has the shallow
slope. This indicates that ideal number of components are two that is the first and the third component.
Component Matrix a
Component
1 2 3
EPS(Rs/yr) .879 .028 .214
P/E -.400 .476 .394
CurrentRatio -.555 .441 .468
DebttoEquity ratio .637 .559 .209
Assets TurnOver Ratio -.027 .491 -.346
Operating Profit -.330 -.099 .838
Margin
Net Profit Margin -.140 -.579 .644
Dividend/Share(Rs) .774 -.019 .295
Return On NetWorth .352 -.738 -.040
EBDIT(RsCr) .799 .285 .299
a. 3 components extracted.
The above table gives each variables component loadings but it’s the next table which is easy to interpret.
Rotated Component Matrix a

Component
1 2 3
EPS(Rs/yr) .856 -.287 .060
P/E -.051 .734 .013
DebttoEquity ratio .808 .188 -.274
Assets TurnOver Ratio -.004 .157 -.580
Operating Profit .002 .553 .717
Margin
47 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Net Profit Margin -.055 .028 .875
Return On NetWorth .064 -.695 .428
EBDIT(RsCr) .898 -.028 -.040
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
This table is the most important for interpretation. The maximum of each row
indicates that the respective variable belongs to respective component. The
variables ‘EPS’,DebttoEquity ratio’,’Dividend/Share’ and ‘EBDIT’ are highly
coorelated and contribute to single first component. ‘’P/E’, ‘CurrentRatio’, ‘Return
on NetWorth’ contribute to the second component. And ‘AssetTurnOverRatio’,
‘OperatingProfitMargin’ and ‘Net Profit Margin’ contribute to the third component.
Component Transformation Matrix

Component 1 2 3
1 .871 -.483 -.091
2 .309 .681 -.664
3 .382 .550 .742
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser
Normalization.
Component Score Coefficient Matrix

Component
1 2 3
EPS(Rs/yr) .292 -.063 .050
P/E .045 .344 .005
CurrentRatio .011 .377 .051
Assets TurnOver Ratio .000 .075 -.303
Margin
Net Profit Margin .000 .008 .456
48 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Return On NetWorth -.027 -.324 .226
EBDIT(RsCr) .328 .064 -.002
Component Scores.
This table gives the components scores for each variables. The component scores can be saved for each
case in the Shares.sav file. These scores are useful to replace internally related variables in the regression
analysis. In the above table scores are given component wise. The factor score for each component can be
calculated as the linear combinations of the component scores of that component.
Component Score Covariance Matrix

Component 1 2 3
1 1.000 .000 .000
2 .000 1.000 .000
3 .000 .000 1.000
Component Scores.
49 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
COMMON FACTOR ANALYSIS
Correlation Matrix
DebttoEquity
Correlation EPS(Rs/yr) 1.000 -.219 -.302 .523
P/E -.219 1.000 .544 -.040
CurrentRatio -.302 .544 1.000 -.128
DebttoEquity ratio .523 -.040 -.128 1.000
Assets TurnOver Ratio -.095 .111 .034 .216
Operating Profit -.142 .290 .466 .016
Margin
Net Profit Margin -.043 -.035 .010 -.202
Dividend/Share(Rs) .783 -.011 -.149 .364
Return On NetWorth .267 -.319 -.458 -.221
EBDIT(RsCr) .670 -.151 -.237 .745
Correlation Matrix
Assets
TurnOver Operating Net Profit Dividend/Shar
Ratio Profit Margin Margin e(Rs)
Correlation EPS(Rs/yr) -.095 -.142 -.043 .783
P/E .111 .290 -.035 -.011
CurrentRatio .034 .466 .010 -.149
DebttoEquity ratio .216 .016 -.202 .364
Assets TurnOver Ratio 1.000 -.174 -.322 -.070
Operating Profit -.174 1.000 .641 -.102
Margin
Net Profit Margin -.322 .641 1.000 -.007
Dividend/Share(Rs) -.070 -.102 -.007 1.000
Return On NetWorth -.126 -.036 .259 .429
EBDIT(RsCr) -.066 -.048 -.032 .577
Correlation Matrix
50 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Return On EBDIT(RsCr
NetWorth )
Correlation EPS(Rs/yr) .267 .670
P/E -.319 -.151
CurrentRatio -.458 -.237
DebttoEquity ratio -.221 .745
Assets TurnOver Ratio -.126 -.066
Operating Profit -.036 -.048
Margin
Net Profit Margin .259 -.032
Return On NetWorth 1.000 -.041
EBDIT(RsCr) -.041 1.000
The above matrix is a correlation matrix. The Common Factor Analysis can be carried out if the
correlation matrix for the variables contains at least two correlations of .3 or greater. We see from above
that there are more than two correlations of more than 0.3 so we can carry out CFA.
KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling .532
Adequacy.
Bartlett's Test of Approx. Chi-Square 156.183
Sphericity df 45
Sig. .000
KMO Bartlett’s measure of Sampling Adequacy is an index used to test appropriateness of the factor
analysis. The minimum required valu of KMO is 0.5. The above table shows that the index for the data is
.532 and the chi-square statistics is significant(<0.05). This means that the CFA(Common Component
Analysis) is appropriate for this data.
Anti-image Matrices
DebttoEquity
51 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Anti-image EPS(Rs/yr) .261 .092 .045 -.050

Covariance P/E .092 .588 -.053 .012
CurrentRatio .045 -.053 .336 .077
DebttoEquity ratio -.050 .012 .077 .273
Assets TurnOver Ratio .055 -.055 -.024 -.170
Operating Profit -.010 -.085 -.179 -.112
Margin
Dividend/Share(Rs) -.142 -.126 -.103 -.003
Return On NetWorth .034 .125 .184 .081
EBDIT(RsCr) -.017 .053 .048 -.146
a
Anti-image EPS(Rs/yr) .749 .234 .154 -.188
Correlation P/E .234 .609a
-.119 .030
a
CurrentRatio .154 -.119 .464 .256
DebttoEquity ratio -.188 .030 .256 .551a
Assets TurnOver Ratio .125 -.083 -.048 -.376
Operating Profit -.036 -.211 -.588 -.409
Margin
Dividend/Share(Rs) -.616 -.364 -.393 -.012
Return On NetWorth .116 .285 .554 .271
EBDIT(RsCr) -.066 .135 .163 -.550
Anti-image Matrices
Assets
TurnOver Operating Net Profit
Ratio Profit Margin Margin
Anti-image EPS(Rs/yr) .055 -.010 .009
Covariance P/E -.055 -.085 .052
CurrentRatio -.024 -.179 .118
DebttoEquity ratio -.170 -.112 .112
Assets TurnOver Ratio .752 .060 .040
Operating Profit .060 .275 -.231
Margin
Net Profit Margin .040 -.231 .373
Dividend/Share(Rs) -.005 .064 -.023
52 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010

EBDIT(RsCr) .098 .006 -.044
Anti-image EPS(Rs/yr) .125 -.036 .027
Correlation P/E -.083 -.211 .111
CurrentRatio -.048 -.588 .334
DebttoEquity ratio -.376 -.409 .350
a
Assets TurnOver Ratio .481 .132 .075
Operating Profit .132 .378a -.723
Margin
Net Profit Margin .075 -.723 .439a
Dividend/Share(Rs) -.012 .272 -.082
EBDIT(RsCr) .223 .022 -.142
Anti-image Matrices
Dividend/Shar Return On EBDIT(RsCr
e(Rs) NetWorth )
Anti-image EPS(Rs/yr) -.142 .034 -.017
Covariance P/E -.126 .125 .053
DebttoEquity ratio -.003 .081 -.146
Assets TurnOver Ratio -.005 -.041 .098
Operating Profit .064 -.098 .006
Margin
Net Profit Margin -.023 .010 -.044
Dividend/Share(Rs) .203 -.159 -.083
Return On NetWorth -.159 .328 .084
EBDIT(RsCr) -.083 .084 .259
Anti-image EPS(Rs/yr) -.616 .116 -.066
Correlation P/E -.364 .285 .135
DebttoEquity ratio -.012 .271 -.550
Operating Profit .272 -.327 .022
Margin
53 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Dividend/Share(Rs) .508a -.615 -.361
Return On NetWorth -.615 .400a .288
EBDIT(RsCr) -.361 .288 .691a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Communalities
Initial Extraction
EPS(Rs/yr) .739 .784
P/E .412 .302
CurrentRatio .664 .554
DebttoEquity ratio .727 .672
Assets TurnOver Ratio .248 .140
Operating Profit .725 .919
Margin
Net Profit Margin .627 .619
Return On NetWorth .672 .591
EBDIT(RsCr) .741 .766
Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.
Initial Communalities are the proportion of the variance accounted for in each variable by the rest of the
variables. Small communalities for the variable indicates that the proportion of the variance that this
variable shares with other variables is too small. Thus this variable does not fit the factor solution.IN the
above table most of the intial communalities are high indicating that all the variables share a good amount
of variance with each other, an ideal solution for factor analysis.
Extraction Communalities are the estimates of the variance in each variable accounted for by the factors
in the factor solution. The communalities in this table are all high. It tells that the extracted factors
represents the variables well.

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Factor Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
54 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
1 3.139 31.388 31.388 2.817 28.168 28.168

2 1.946 19.462 50.850 1.593 15.928 44.096
3 1.878 18.784 69.634 1.490 14.897 58.993
4 .988 9.876 79.510
5 .845 8.452 87.962
6 .451 4.509 92.471
7 .303 3.031 95.502
8 .224 2.237 97.738
9 .130 1.304 99.042
10 .096 .958 100.000

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Factor Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2.525 25.252 25.252
2 1.801 18.008 43.260
3 1.573 15.733 58.993
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

The Output gives the variance explained by the initial solution. This table gives the total variance
contributed by each component. We may note that the percentage of total variance contributed by first
component is 31.388, by second component is 19.462 and by the third component is 18.784. So
percentage of variances is highest for the first factor and decreases thereafter. It is also clear from the
table that there are a total of three distinct factors for each given set of variables.
The below SCree Plot give the number of factors against the eigen values and helps in determining
optimal number of factors. IN the below plot only first and third factors have steep slope and eigen values
greater than 1. Although 2nd factor has eigen value greater then 1 but it has a shallow slope which
55 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
indicates the contribution of total variance by this 2nd factor is less. Hence the ideal number of factors are
two i.e. 1st and 3rd factors.
Factor Matrix a
Factor
1 2 3
EPS(Rs/yr) .865 .189 -.016
P/E -.316 .243 .378
DebttoEquity ratio .619 .176 .508
Operating Profit -.340 .896 -.027
Margin
56 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
Dividend/Share(Rs) .706 .223 -.065
Return On NetWorth .298 .010 -.708
EBDIT(RsCr) .790 .263 .270
a. 3 factors extracted. 24 iterations required.
Rotated Factor Matrix a

Factor
1 2 3
EPS(Rs/yr) .822 -.323 .060
P/E -.071 .545 .007
Assets TurnOver Ratio .002 .118 -.354
Margin
Net Profit Margin -.060 .007 .785
Return On NetWorth .042 -.660 .392
EBDIT(RsCr) .873 -.040 -.042
a. Rotation converged in 5 iterations.
This table is the most important for interpretation. The maximum of each row
indicates that the respective variable belongs to respective component.
The variables ‘EPS’,DebttoEquity ratio’,’Dividend/Share’ and ‘EBDIT’ are highly
coorelated and contribute to single first factor which can be named as
‘Comprehensive Earnings of the Company’.
‘’P/E’, ‘CurrentRatio’, ‘Return on NetWorth’ are highly coorelated and contribute
to the second factor which can be named as ‘Financial Leverage of the Company’.
‘AssetTurnOverRatio’, ‘OperatingProfitMargin’ and ‘Net Profit Margin’ are highly
coorelated and contribute to the third factor which can be named as ‘Profitability of
the Company’.
57 | P a g e
MRA&FA 2010
FACTORS Variables
Factor1 EarningsPerShare, DividendperShare and Earnings Before Depriciation,Interest
Comprehensive abd taxes and Debt to equity Ratio.
Earnings of the
Company
Factor3 ‘AssetTurnOverRatio’, ‘OperatingProfitMargin’ and ‘Net Profit Margin’.
Profitability
Margins of the
Company
It Implies that the an Investor before investing in the Share Market should consider the Above important
factors which are Comprehensive Earnings of the Company over the years and its Profitability
Margins e.g. How much profit Company is able to generate per unit of sales.
Factor Transformation Matrix

Factor 1 2 3
1 .878 -.465 -.116
2 .362 .483 .798
3 .315 .742 -.592
Extraction Method: Principal Axis
Factoring.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser
Normalization.
58 | P a g e

MRA&amp FA 251,341

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MRA&amp FA 251,341

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui

By: Shakti Singh Rathore251

MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Regression With Enter Method

The descriptive statistics provide overall distributions of variables.

Operating Profit Margin -.123 -.142 .290 .466

Return On Net Worth -.036 .259 .429

Current Ratio .004

1 Return On Net . Enter

Method of entering the variables is enter.

Adjusted R Std. Error of

b. Dependent Variable: Price(Rs)

Current Ratio -6.138 37.878 -.018 -.162 .873

1 (Constant) -538.503 232.721

Net Profit Margin .452 2.211

7 .63 .75 .04 .16

Regression with Step-Wise Method

Current Ratio .168 .044 .001 .

Return On Net Worth .421 .073 .006

Adjusted R Std. Error of

d. Dependent Variable: Price(Rs)

EPS(Rs/yr) .342 2.923

d. Dependent Variable: Price(Rs)

PRINCIPLE COMPONENT ANALYSIS

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Total Variance Explained

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotated Component Matrix a

Component Transformation Matrix

Component Score Coefficient Matrix

Component Score Covariance Matrix

COMMON FACTOR ANALYSIS

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Anti-image EPS(Rs/yr) .261 .092 .045 -.050

Return On NetWorth -.041 -.098 .010

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Total Variance Explained

1 3.139 31.388 31.388 2.817 28.168 28.168

Total Variance Explained

Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.

Rotated Factor Matrix a

Factor Transformation Matrix

You might also like