Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstra
t
We present here an introdu
tion to the subje
t of innite-dimensional
Lie algebras. First we give a
ompa
t a
ount on the stru
ture of simple
Lie algebras and their
lassi
ation, introdu
ing the basi
terminology we
are going to use throughout the paper. Then we study the untwisted aÆne
Lie algebras (also known as untwisted aÆne Ka
-Moody algebras) whi
h
are a spe
ial kind of Ka
-Moody algebras. We will dene aÆne Lie alge-
bras in two ways. The rst - more abstra
t - uses the notion of generalized
Cartan matri
es while the se
ond
onstru
ts them as
entral extensions
of loop algebras and it is more intuitive. We will also des
ribe the Vi-
rasoro algebra, the innite-dimensional Lie algebra related to
onformal
transformations in two dimensions.
1
1 Introdu
tion
Innite-dimensional Lie algebras appeared in mathemati
s in 1967 when
V. Ka
[1℄ and R. Moody [4℄ generalized the notion of Cartan matrix - whi
h
des
ribes the stru
ture of semisimple Lie algebras - and so they
onstru
ted
Lie algebras with an innite number of generators. At the same time, physi-
ists were studying the so-
alled \dual resonan
e models" whi
h led to what is
known as \string theory". The resear
h on string theory showed the parti
ular
importan
e of the
onformal invarian
e of the two-dimensional quantum eld
theory that is taking pla
e on the two-dimensional string world-sheet. So,
on-
formal quantum eld theory in two dimensions be
ame of parti
ular interest
and it was proved that its symmetries
ould be des
ribed with
ertain
lasses
of innite-dimensional algebras.
However, innite-dimensional Lie algebras had already o
ured in elemen-
trary parti
le physi
s in the form of \
urrent algebras". The simplest theory
where su
h an algebra
an be en
ountered is that of free massless fermions in
1+1 dimensions. Later it was found that several two-dimensional -models give
rise to innite-dimensiomal symmetry algebras and now these models are
alled
Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) theories. Finally, the most ex
iting dis
overy is
that the models that des
ribe the behaviour of statisti
al systems near the
riti
al temparature of a se
ond order phase transition, are also equiped with
innite-dimensional Lie algebras that are related to the symmetry of the
riti
al
point under lo
al s
ale tranformations. Sin
e there is a general
orrespondan
e
between statisti
al systems and Eu
lidean quantum eld theories, it seems nat-
ural that stru
tures that
hara
terize two-dimensional
onformal quantum eld
theories will also appear in two-dimensional statisti
al models with
onformal
symmetry, that is lo
al s
ale invarian
e.
Here, we will fo
us on the mathemati
al aspe
ts of the most
ommon
innite-dimensional Lie algebras, the untwisted aÆne Lie algebras and the Vi-
rasoro algebra. First we will review some basi
fa
ts about simple Lie algebras
with an orientation towards their
lassi
ation with Cartan matri
es. Then
we will present two dierent ways to dene aÆne Lie algebras. The rst -
based on the Cartan matrix approa
h - is the same as the one followed by Ka
and Moody and it is a straightforward generalization of the Cartan matrix by
relaxing some of the
onditions on its elements. The se
ond is
onstru
tive
and so gives an intuitive pi
ture of aÆne Lie algebras and their relation with
the nite-dimensional simple Lie algebras. It is based on the notions of loop
algebras and
entral extensions. We will also introdu
e the Virasoro algebra.
This is a innite-dimensional Lie algebra that results as
entral extension of the
2
Witt algebra. The Witt algebra is related to
onformal transformations in two
dimensions be
ause the Lie algebra of these transformations is the dire
t sum
of two Witt algebras.
3
Sin
e the generators fH ig of a Cartan subalgebra
ommute among themshelves,
the
orresponding adjoint maps are simultaneously diagonalizable. A
tually, it
an be seen that this holds for every element of the Cartan subalgebra. We
an now
hoose the rest of the generators of g in su
h a way that the following
ondition is satised :
[H i; E ℄ = i E for i = 1; 2; :::; r; (3)
where fE g together with fH ig are a basis of g. The eigenvalue i := (H i)
must be non-zero for at least one i. The r-dimensional ve
tor (ai)i=1;2;:::;r is
alled a root ve
tor or root of g and we
an see that it belongs to the dual
ve
tor spa
e of g0. The set of all root ve
tors is
alled the root system and will
be denoted be . It
an be proved that for a semisimple Lie algebra the roots
are non-degenerate. That means that there is only one - up to normalization
- generator E for every label and so the spa
es g := spanC fE g are one-
dimensional. We see that g
an be written as :
g = g0 =6 0 g (4)
and this splitting is
alled root spa
e de
omposition relative to g0. The basis
B = fH i j i = 1; 2; :::; rg[ fE j 2 g is the Cartan-Weyl basis of g. It must
be obvious that this basis is far from being unique. The generators fE j 2 g
are
alled step or ladder operators asso
iated with the roots 2 , be
ause
the a
tion of them on an element of a representation spa
e with eigenvalues
i with respe
t to the Cartan subalgebra generators, produ
es elements with
eigenvalues i + i .
The roots span the dual spa
e of the Cartan subalgebra, spanC () = g0,
whi
h is
alled root spa
e, while it
an also be proved than if 2 then the
only multiple of than belongs to is . Sin
e g is an algebra and thus
a ve
tor spa
e, we
an dene inner produ
ts on it. There is a natural inner
produ
t on g
alled the Cartan-Killing form, whi
h is dened as :
: gg ! C; (x; y) := tr(adx Æ ady ) 8 x; y 2 g: (5)
With \Æ" we mean the
omposition of maps while \tr" is the tra
e. Sin
e the
adjoint map is linear, the Cartan-Killing form is bilinear while
y
li
invari-
an
e of the tra
e implies that it is symmetri
. Finally the following invarian
e
property holds :
([x; y℄; z) = (x; [y; z℄) 8 x; y; z 2 g: (6)
For a simple Lie algebra g these properties dene the Cartan-Killing form up
4
to a normalization
onstant.
In order to provide an inner produ
t for g, must be non-degenerate.
Cartan proved that this is true exa
tly when g is semisimple. A
tually, in
this
ase, the restri
tion of to g0 is also non-degenerate and so the Cartan
subalgebra is equiped with an inner produ
t an thus we are able to identify it
with its dual spa
e, that is the root spa
e. For every root we
an asso
iate
an element H of g0 (up to normalization) so that :
(h) =
(H ; h) 8h2g ;0 (7)
where
is a normalization
onstant that we will
hoose later. We
an dene
an inner produ
t in g0 in the following way :
(; ) :=
(H ; H ) 8 ; 2 (8)
and extend it to all g0 g0 by bilinearity.
In general the number of roots is greater than the rank of g and so they
are linearly dependent. We
an always
hoose r of them to serve as a basis, with
the following
ondition : every other root
an be written as an integral linear
onbination of the basis roots with either only positive or negative
oeÆ
ients.
The
orresponding roots are
alled positive and negative roots respe
tively.
The roots that
onsist this basis are
alled simple roots and we will denote
them by f(i) j i = 1; 2; :::; rg. It must be obvious that they span the whole
root spa
e. However the simple root basis is not orthonormal - in terms of the
indu
ed metri
on the root spa
e by the Cartan-Killing form - and a
tually
the stru
ture of g is en
oded in the inner produ
ts of the simple roots among
themshelves. So we dene the Cartan matrix A of g as the r r matrix with
elements :
((i) ; (j))
Aij := 2 (j) (j) ; i; j = 1; 2; :::; r: (9)
( ; )
For any root we dene the
oroot ^ as :
2
^ := (10)
(; ) :
In terms of
oroots, the Cartan matrix elements are :
Aij := (i ; ^(j)): (11)
If we
onsider the root spa
e as the real span of the simple roots, its dual spa
e
is
alled weight spa
e and its elements the weights of g. The basis B of the root
5
spa
e with elements the simple
oroots :
B := f^(i) j i = 1; 2; :::; rg (12)
will be frequently used in the next se
tions. We
an also
onsider the dual basis
of B. Its elements are
alled fundamental weights f(i) j i = 1; 2; :::; rg and
their denition is :
(i) (^(j) ) = Æij for i; j = 1; 2; :::; r: (13)
The basis B := f(i) j i = 1; 2; :::; rg is
alled the Dynkin basis of the weight
spa
e. Sin
e the root spa
e is endowed with an inner produ
t, we
an identify
it with its dual spa
e, the weight spa
e. That means that roots and weights
an be treated in equal footing sin
e for every root we
an asso
iate a weight
as follows :
(
) = (;
) 8
2 span (): (14)
Sin
e every root
an be written as = Pri=1 bi (i) where bi are either all
R
I
6
subalgebra generators :
[E ; E ℄ =
Xr e H i: (19)
i
i=1
We return now at the denition of the inner produ
t on the root spa
e and x
the normalization
onstant
we left arbitrary in (7). We
hoose
= 12 (; )
and if we put h = H in (7) we get :
(H ) =
1(; ) (20)
or by using the denition of
oroots :
(H ) = (; ^): (21)
Now, any root
an be written as a sum of simple roots or - that is the same -
simple
oroots :
Xr
= i ^(i) : (22)
i=1
Also any weight, element of the dual of the root spa
e,
an be written in the
basis of fundamental weights :
=
Xr i : (23)
i
i=1
(; ) =
Xr i (24)
i
i=1
7
[E ; E ℄ = H ; (29)
[E ; E ℄ = e(; )E + for 6= : (30)
Now we see that [E ; E m+ ℄ / E (m+1)+ for every m 2 ZZ. That
means that the subspa
e mgm+ is a module of sl(2), where sl(2) is a
sl(2)-subalgebra of g spanned by fH ; E; E g. Sin
e g is non-degenerate
this module is irredu
ible and so the roots + m are its weights. We know
however from the representation theory of sl(2) that the string of weights of an
irredu
ible sl(2)-module must have the form :
S; = f + m j m = n ; n + 1; :::; n
1 1 2 1; n2g (31)
with n1; n2 non-negative integers. S; is
alled an -string through . Also
the lowest weight must be minus the highest and so ( n1)(H ) = ( +
n2)(H ). That gives (; ^) = (H ) = 21 (n1 n2)(H ) = n1 n2 sin
e
(H ) = (; ^) = 2. So, we get the important result, that the inner produ
t
(; ^) is an integer. Also n1 > n2 0 if (; ) > 0 while n2 > n1 0 if
(; ) < 0. Thus we have :
2 , (; ) > 0; (32)
+ 2 , (; ) < 0: (33)
Sin
e however only the simple roots are enough to des
ribe the root sys-
tem, we
an keep only the step operators asso
iated with them. We write
Ei := E . Now [E+i ; E j ℄ = 0 if i 6= j sin
e the dieren
e of simple
(i)
roots a(i) a(j)
annot be a root. This is true be
ause all roots
an be
written as linear
ombinations of simple roots wih either all positive or all
negative
oeÆ
ients. Otherwise we have [E+i ; E i ℄ = H from (29). From
(i)
(25) we see that H = Pri=1(^(i) )jH j = H i sin
e obviously (^(i) )j = Æji .
(i)
So the generators of the Cartan subalgebra asso
iated to the simple roots
are just the original Cartan subalgebra generators. Now from (28) we get
[H ; E ℄ = (^(i) ; (j))E or, using the denition of the Cartan ma-
(i) (j) (j)
trix and the previous formulas, [H i; Ej ℄ = Aji Ej . Finally, it
an be proved
that the equation (adE ) )1 A Ej = 0 is equivalent to (28). Here (adx )n is a
i
ji
short way to write adx Æadx Æ:::Æadx for n times, where (adx Æadx )(y) = [x; [x; y℄℄.
The set of generators fH i; E j i = 1; 2; :::; rg is
alled Chevalley-Serre
i
basis. We
an summarize the Lie bra
ket relations among these generators as :
[H i; H j℄ = 0; (34)
8
[H i; Ej ℄ = Aji Ej ; (35)
[E+i ; E j ℄ = Æij H j ; (36)
(adE ) )1 Aji E j
i = 0: (37)
The Chevalley-Serre basis is an algebrai
basis of the Lie algebra. That means
that the Lie algebra is spanned by arbitrary linear
ombinations of arbitraty
multiple Lie bra
kets of the basi
generators, taking into
onsideration the
above relations. The
onstru
tion of a Lie algebra from its Chevalley-Serre
basis is
alled Serre
onstru
tion and it
an be proved that for a given Cartan
matrix their is a unique Lie algebra that results from this
onstru
tion. So the
stru
ture of every semisimple Lie algebra is en
oded in its Cartan matrix.
The
lassi
ation of Lie algebras rests now upon the
lassi
ation of all
the possible Cartan matri
es. First it is easy to see that for a semisimple Lie
algebra there is an arrangement of the simple roots so that the Cartan matrix
be
omes blo
k diagonal. Sin
e semisiple Lie algebras are dire
t sums of simple
Lie algebras, we
an restri
t the
lassi
ation to simple Lie algebras. To a
hieve
this we have to
onsider inde
omposable Cartan matri
es, matri
es for whi
h
no renumbering of the simple roots exists that brings them to blo
k diagonal
form.
From the denition (9) of the Cartan matrix we see that Aii = 2. The
symmetry of the inner produ
t in root spa
e suggests that Aji = 0 if and only
if Aij = 0. We have proved that the inner produ
t (; ^) is an integer and so
Aij = ((i) ; ^(j)) 2 ZZ. Furthermore, sin
e the dieren
e of simple roots is never
a root and (33) holds, it follows that ((i) ; (j)) 0 for i 6= j and hen
e Aij
must be a non-positive integer.
Now, it
an be shown that the symmetrized Cartan matrix :
10
3 Ka
-Moody algebras
If someone relaxes some of the
onditions on the Cartan matrix elements,
it is possible to get new and in fa
t very interesting
lasses of Lie algebras. The
expli
it
onstru
tion of these algebras is done with the Serre
onstru
tion ap-
plied for the new
lass of Cartan matri
es. Usually however, one has to enlarge
the Cartan subalgebra with new generators
alled derivations, for reasons that
will be explained later.
The notion of general Ka
-Moody algebras refers to Lie algebras whose
Cartan matrix satises equations (39),(40),(41) but its determinant is not re-
stri
ted to be positive. Su
h a matrix will be
alled generalized Cartan matrix.
In general if the determinant of the Cartan matrix is not positive, the
orre-
sponding Lie algebra is innite-dimensional. Also the number of su
h algebras
is extremely large and usually suÆ
es to study the so-
alled symmetrizable Ka
-
Moody algebras. For these, there exist a non-degenerate diagonal matrix D so
that the matrix DA, with A the generalized Cartan matrix, is symmetri
. Any
nite-dimensional simple Lie algebra is symmetrizable as it
an be easily seen.
Also it
an be proved that a symmetrizable Ka
-Moody algebra is simple if and
only if the generalized Cartan matrix is inde
omposable and its determinant is
non-zero.
2); Dr(1)(r 4); Br(2)(r 3); Cr(2)(r 2); B~r(2)(r 2) and the ex
eptionals are
A(1)
1
; E6(1); E7(1); E8(1); F4(1); G(1)
2
; A(2)
1
; F4(2); G(2)
2
. The aÆne Lie algebras are thus
(l)
denoted by Xr where Xr is a simple Lie algebra and l 2 f1; 2; 3g. The algebras
with l = 1 are known as untwisted aÆne Lie algebras while those with l = 2; 3
are
alled twisted aÆne Lie algebras.
5 Central extensions
Central extensions are a formal way to handle the normal-ordering diÆ-
uties that are asso
iated with the transition from
lassi
al to quantum theories.
While in the
lassi
al level the symmetries of a
ertain system are des
ribed by
a Lie algebra g, in many
ases the
orresponding Lie bra
kets for the quantum
ase
annot be re
overed
ompletely. Usually, in addition to the terms already
present at the
lassi
al equations, there appear further terms whi
h however are
not entirely arbitrary. The
onstraint is that these terms must have
onstant
eigenvalues on the irredu
ible modules of the Lie algebra g. Thus - from S
hur'r
lemma - they must have zero Lie bra
kets with all the elements of g. The set
of the original generators of g with the additional \
entral" terms is
alled a
entral extension g of the Lie algebra g.
From the previous dis
ussion we see that in order to
onstru
t a
entral
extension of g, we have to adjoin l additional generators K j ; j = 1; 2; :::; l to a
basis T a of g and impose the following relations :
[K i ; K j℄ = 0; [T a; K j ℄ = 0; i; j = 1; 2; :::; l; a = 1; 2; :::; d = dim(g): (52)
If the Lie bra
kets of the original Lie algebra g are :
[T a; T b℄ =
Xd f ab T
(53)
=1
then the most general form for the Lie bra ket of generators of g is :
[T a; T b℄ =
Xd f ab T
+ Xl f ab K i : (54)
i
=1 i=1
The new additional stru
ture
onstants f abi are not
ompletely arbitrary but
are
onstrained by the Ja
oby identity. The simplest solution would be f abi 0
and then the
entral extension is just the dire
t sum of the original Lie algebra
12
g and an l-fold of one-dimensional Lie algebras :
g
= g (u(1))l: (55)
It must be obvious however that this extension of g is not parti
ularly impor-
tant. In fa
t there are many other
entral extensions whi
h
an be redu
ed to
this form by a redenition of the generators and the stru
ture
onstants. So the
spa
e of the inequivalent non-trivial
entral extensions is the spa
e of solutions
for f abi that satisfy the
onstraint from the Ja
obi identity modulo these solu-
tions that give
entral extensions of the form (55). It
an be proved that the
set of these inequivalent non-trivial
entral extensions is a ve
tor spa
e and it
is
alled the se
ond Lie algebra
ohomology H 2(g; RI ) of g. Finally we mention
here that the
entral extension of a redu
tive Lie algebra is again redu
tive.
6 Loop algebras
Loop algebras are a parti
ularly interesting
lass of innite-dimensional
Lie algebras be
ause their
entral extensions
an be promoted to aÆne Lie alge-
bras. For every Lie algebra g we
an dene its loop algebra gloop as the algebra
of analyti
mappings from S 1 to g with pointwise addition and multipli
ation.
Suppose now that fT a j a = 1; 2; :::; d = dim(g)g is a basis of g. Then sin
e S 1
an be
onsidered as the unit
ir
le in the
omplex plane, it
an be parametrized
by z = e2it; t 2 [0; 2℄. A basis of gloop is the set :
B = fTna j a = 1; 2; :::; d; n 2 ZZg (56)
with Tna := T a zn. A
tually this set is not a ve
tor spa
e basis but a topologi
al
basis of gloop be
ause gloop results as the
losure of the set of all linear
ombina-
tions of elements of B. It is easy to see that the following Lie bra
ket relation
is true :
Xd
[Tna; Tmb ℄ = f ab
Tn
+m (57)
=1
where f ab
are the stru
ture
onstants of g. So gloop inherits from g a Lie algebra
stru
ture. We
an also see that gloop is a ZZ-graded Lie algebra. The subspa
e
of gloop generated by fT0a j a = 1; 2; :::; dg is a Lie subalgebra of gloop
alled
zero mode subalgebra of gloop and it is isomorphi
to the original Lie algebra g.
If g is the Lie algebra of a Lie group G, then gloop is the Lie algebra of the loop
group Gloop of G, that is the set of analyti
mappings from S 1 to G. Finally
13
we
an summarize the stru
ture of gloop as :
gloop := C [z; z 1℄
C g: (58)
[Tma ; Tnb℄ =
Xd f ab T
Xl (f ab ) i:
n+m + i mnK (59)
=1 i=1
[Tma ; Tnb℄ =
Xd f ab T
a b
n+m + mÆn+m;0 (T0 ; T0 )K (60)
=1
14
It
an be proved that the generators fD; K; Tna j a = 1; 2; :::; r; n 2 ZZg span
indeed an aÆne Lie algebra g(1) , whi
h stru
ture is :
g(1) := C [z; z 1℄
C g CK CD: (63)
The reason for the supers
ript (1) is that when g = Xr, with X 2 fA; B; C; D; E; F; Gg,
then g(1) is exa
tly the aÆne Lie algebra Xr(1) we dened in se
tion 4. So, we
see that the pro
edure of
onstru
ting aÆne Lie algebras as
entral extensions
of loop algebras yields the untwisted aÆne Lie algebras. However it
an be
proved that if we
onsider multi-valued maps from S 1 to g as elements of a new
algebra, then the
orresponding
entral extension will give a twisted aÆne Lie
algebra.
Although the
onstru
tion of aÆne Lie algebras in terms of
entral ex-
tensions of loop algebras shows that they are indeed innite-dimensional, it is
not a trivial task to prove that they are the same with the aÆne Lie algebras
we dened earlier using generalized Cartan matri
es. In order to a
hieve this,
a
arefull and
omplete analysis of the root system of the former is required.
We will give a brief introdu
tion to this subje
t in the next se
tion.
Sin
e the generator D appears only at the left side of any Lie bra
ket we
see that the derived algebra of g(1) , that is the algebra spanned by all the Lie
bra
kets of elements of g(1), is the same as gloop :
[g(1); g(1)℄ = gloop (64)
and for this reason D is
alled the derivation of g(1). The introdu
tion of
D is ne
essary for a number of reasons. We see that D measures the mode
number of Tma and thus avoids
ertain innite multipli
ities that are en
ountered
in the root system of gloop , as we will see later. Also D makes the Cartan-
Killing form non-degenerate, sin
e the original denition of it as a tra
e gives
ill-dened results over innite-dimensional algebras. Usually for su
h algebras,
one denes the Cartan-Killing form from its properies, whi
h for semisimple
algebras
hara
terize the Cartan-Killing form up to a normalization
onstant.
Using this pro
edure, the Cartan-Killing form for g(1) gives :
(Tma ; Tnb) = (T0a; T0b)Æm+n;0; (65)
(Tma ; K ) = (Tma ; D) = (K; K ) = 0; (66)
(D; D) = 1; (67)
where (T0a; T0b) is the Cartan-Killing form of g.
15
8 Stru
ture of aÆne Lie algebras
We
an
onstru
t the generators and the Lie bra
kets among them, for
aÆne Lie algebras, dire
tly from the
orresponding Cartan matri
es using Serre's
onstru
tion. However this
an be proved a very
ompli
ated pro
edure and
it is mu
h easier to use their expli
it realization as
entral extensions of loop
algebras of simple Lie algebras with a derivation.
We
hoose rst a Cartan-Weyl basis for the original simple Lie algebra
g. Let fH i j i = 1; 2; :::; rg [ fE j 2 g su
h a basis. In terms of the
orresponding generators for g(1) and given (27),(28),(29),(30), the Lie bra
ket
relations (60)
an be written as :
[Hmi ; Hnj ℄ = mGij Æn+m;0K; (68)
[Hmi ; En℄ = i En+m; (69)
[En; En ℄ = e(; )Em++n if + 2 ; (70)
[En; E n℄ =
Xr H i + nK; (71)
i 0
i=1
where i; j 2 f1; 2; :::; rg and ; are roots of g. G is the symmetrized Cartan
matrix (38) and we use it here sin
e (T0i; T0j) = Gij as it
an easily be seen by
its denition.
We want now to determine the Cartan subalgebra g0(1) of g(1). It is obvious
that the Cartan subalgebra of g, spanned by H0i , will be a subspa
e of g0(1).
Moreover from the bra
ket relations for K and D we see that they must also
belong to g0(1). Sin
e [D; Hnj ℄ 6= 0 for n 6= 0, there are no other
ommuting
generators. So we
an write g0(1) = spanC fK; D; H0i j i = 1; 2; :::; rg. We
an
also use the notation H~ for fH0i j i = 1; 2; :::; rg.
A simple inspe
tion of (68),(69),(70),(71) shows that the roots, with re-
spe
t to the Cartan subalgebra generators (H; ~ K; D), are :
= (; 0; n); 2 ; n 2 ZZ (72)
and
= (0; 0; n); n 2 ZZ (73)
where the
orresponding step operators are fEn j n 2 ZZg and fHnj j n 2
Z g. We see that the roots (72) are non-degenerate while the roots (73) have
Z
16
the
orresponding roots would be innitely degenerate. So D is ne
essary be-
ause it distinguishes between dierent labels n and leaves only a nite (r-fold)
degenera
y of the roots (73).
A root of g(1) will be
alled positive if either n > 0 or n = 0 and is
positive in , while the remaining roots will be negative. With this
hoi
e, the
simple roots are :
(i) = ((i) ; 0; 0); i = 1; 2; :::; r (74)
and
(0) = ( ; 0; 1) (75)
where is the highest root of g. Any positive root of g(1)
an be written as a
linear
ombination of them with positive
oeÆ
ients while for a negative root
the
oeÆ
ients will be negative.
Any weight of g(1)
an be written in terms of the eigenvalues with respe
t
to the generators of the Cartan subalgebra (H; ~ K; D) as = (; k; n), where
is the weight with respe
t to the generators of g0. The inner produ
t of
two weights 1 = (1; k1; n1) and 2 = (2; k2; n2), as
an be dened from
(65),(66),(67), is :
(1; 2) = (1; 2) + k1n2 + k2n1 (76)
where (1; 2) the inner produ
t of the weights of the original Lie algebra g.
The inner produ
t of roots of g(1) is the same as the inner produ
t of the
orresponding roots of g :
(1; 2) = (1; 2) (77)
for i = (i ; 0; 0); i = 1; 2. It follows that the inner produ
t of the non-
degenerate roots is positive, while that of the degenerate roots is zero. These
roots are
alled lightlike sin
e the metri
in the root spa
e, as dened by
(65),(66),(67), has a negative eigenvalue and thus a Lorentzian stru
ture.
Finally we
an dene the Cartan matrix A as :
Aij := 2
((i) ; (j)) ; i; j = 1; 2; :::; r: (78)
((j); (j))
It
an be proved that this is the same as the aÆne Cartan matrix we introdu
ed
earlier and that means that the
entral extensions of loop algebras of simple
Lie algebras are indeed aÆne Lie algebras in the sense of se
tion 4.
17
9 The Virasoro algebra
The Virasoro algebra is the unique
entral extension of the Witt algebra,
that is the Lie algebra of
onformal tranformations in two dimensions. If we
onsider a two dimensional spa
e as a
ompa
tied
omplex plane parametrized
by z and z, the
onformal transformations of this spa
e are generated by all the
mappings z ! f (z) and z^ ! f^(^z), where f and f are independent meromorphi
fun
tions. Writing ea
h of these fun
tions as a Laurent expansion in z and
z
orrespondingly, we see that the operators ln = zn+1 dzd ; n 2 ZZ and the
similar ones with z instead of z, a
t as innitesimal generators of the
onformal
transformations. We will study now the algebra of the operators ln = zn+1 dzd
sin
e the algebra spanned by the similar ones for z is in fa
t isomorphi
to the
former. The algebra of the
onformal transformations is the dire
t produ
t of
these algebras.
The Lie bra
kets among ln, dened as their
ommutator, are :
[lm; ln℄ = (m n)ln+m; n 2 ZZ (79)
and they dene the so-
alled Witt algebra. It is obvious that this Lie algebra
is innite-dimensional.
For appli
ation to physi
s, one is again interested in
entral extensions of
this algebra. The Lus
her-Ma
k theorem proves that there is a unique
entral
extension, whi
h
onsists of adding a
omplex number term an the right side of
equation (79). The generators of this
entral extension are denoted by Ln and
their Lie bra
ket is :
[Lm; Ln℄ = (m n)Ln+m + 12 1 n(n2 1)Æ (80)
n+m;0
;
[Ln;
℄ = 0; n 2 ZZ (81)
where
2 C . The
orresponding Lie algebra is
alled the Virasoro algebra.
To end this review, we mention that the subje
t of representations of both
the aÆne Lie algebras and the Virasoro algebra is very important for appli
ation
to physi
s. Unfortunately la
k of spa
e doesn't permit this dis
ussion here.
Referen
es
[1℄ Ka
V. Fun
t. Anal. Appl. 1 328 (1967).
[2℄ Ka
V. Innite dimensional Lie algebras, Cambridge University Press, Cam-
bridge, 1990.
18
[3℄ Ka
V. Vertex algebras for beginners, Ameri
an Mathemati
al So
iety, Prov-
iden
e, 1997.
[4℄ Moody R. Bull. Amer. Math. So
. bf 73 217 (1967).
[5℄ Fu
hs J. AÆne Lie algebras and quantum groups : an introdu
tion, with
appli
ations in
onformal eld theory, Cambridge University Press, Cam-
bridge, 1992.
[6℄ Fu
hs J., S
hweigert C. Symmetries, Lie algebras and representations : a
graduate
ourse for physi
ists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1997.
[7℄ Fu
hs J. Le
tures on
onformal eld theory and Ka
-Moody algebras, Grad-
uate Course on Conformal Field Theory and Integrable Models, Budapest,
1996.
[8℄ Olive D., Goddard P. Ka
-Moody and Virasoro algebras : a reprint volume
for physi
ists, World S
ienti
, Teane
k, 1988.
[9℄ Di Fran
es
o P., Mathieu P., Sene
hal D. Conformal eld theory, Springer,
New York, 1997.
[10℄ Ketov, S Conformal eld theory, World S
ienti
, River Edge, 1995.
[11℄ Dolan L. Noti
es of the Ameri
an Mathemati
al So
iety De
1995 1489
(1995).
19