Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edition
2007 Syllabus:
Radiation Biology for Diagnostic
and Interventional Radiologists
Wayne R. Hedrick, PhD, Editor
Canton, Ohio
Mahadevappa Mahesh, PhD, Contributor
Baltimore, Maryland
Contents
Instructions
To use this interactive PDF, click once (with your mouse) on the section above
that you wish to study. You will be forwarded to that part of the syllabus.
Each question is one of the following types, as indicated immediately preceding the question:
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
I. Radiation Biology/Effects X
5. Which of the following statements concerning
chromosomal aberrations in stimulated
A
peripheral lymphocytes are true?
1. The majority of the energy received by
biologic material from x rays is transferred by A. They can be used to assess whole-body
radiation exposures
A. Electrons
B. They can be used to detect a dose of 1 cGy
B. Degraded gamma photons
C. They can be used to measure a total body
C. Protons
dose of 10 Gy 3 weeks after exposure
D. Spallation products
D. The number of interchange aberrations is a
linear function of dose for x rays
A
2. The percentage of x-ray damage to biologic
X
material mediated by free radicals is closest to
6. Chromosome changes induced by radiation
A. 10% include
B. 20%
A. Acentric fragments
C. 40%
B. Centric fragments
D. 60%
C. Inversions
E. 90%
D. Symmetric translocations
E. Dicentrics
A
3. X-ray–produced chromosomal aberrations,
A
such as dicentrics and rings, are generated as
7. The phase of the cell cycle that is most variable
a consequence of
in length is
A. A single chromosomal break interacting
A. G1
with itself
B. G2
B. Interaction of two separate chromosomal
C. M
breaks
D. S
C. High-dose events caused by a single
electron
D. Misreplication events A
8. If an asynchronous population of cells is
exposed to a single x-ray dose of 10 Gy, the
A
surviving cells are partly synchronized because
4. Cell killing by x rays correlates best with
A. Radiation block occurs in the G1 phase
A. Damage to DNA bases
B. Radiation block occurs in the S phase
B. The initial number of DNA double-strand
C. Most survivors are in the G2 phase
breaks
D. Most survivors are in the late S phase
C. The final number of DNA double-strand
breaks
D. The number of thymine dimers
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A A
11. The shoulder in cell survival curves is MOST 15. The most likely consequence of an acute total
pronounced when cells are irradiated with body exposure to 1 Gy of x rays is
A. 1-MeV neutrons A. Diarrhea
B. 2-MeV alpha particles B. Decrease in lymphocyte count
C. 5-MeV electrons C. Epilation
D. 100-MeV pi mesons D. Sterility in a female
E. Erythema
A
12. For a given total dose of x rays, a protracted B
exposure at a low dose rate is less effective in 16. Match the items (1–4) with the doses (A–D)
killing mammalian cells than an acute exposure (single acute x-ray exposures).
at a high dose rate, primarily because
1. Dose producing the cerebrovascular
A. Fewer free radicals are produced syndrome
B. The mitotic cell cycle is shortened 2. Estimated dose to double the natural
C. Cell division occurs during exposure mutation rate
D. Ion pairs recombine during extended 3. Typical LD 50/5 (ie, gastrointestinal death)
exposure 4. Typical LD 50/60 in humans
E. Repair of sublethal damage occurs during
A. 100 Gy
exposure
B. 10 Gy
C. 4 Gy
D. 1 Gy
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A
A
78. At the point of interest in the ultrasonic field,
74. What is the principal source of MR-generated the instantaneous intensity is directly propor-
acoustic noise during MR imaging? tional to the square of the ________.
A. Cryogen reclamation system A. Acoustic pressure
B. Room air conditioners B. Acoustic velocity
C. Vibrations of the gradient coils C. Frequency
D. Thermoelastic expansion caused by the D. Mass density
absorption of RF energy in the head
A
A
79. Which of the following describes intensity mea-
75. Current MR imagers produce time-varying surements using the unit of the decibel?
magnetic fields (dB/dt), which can result in
________ in some patients. A. Based on a logarithmic scale
B. Measure of relative intensity
A. Induction of intense pain (brain stimulation) C. A factor of two reduction in intensity corre-
B. Cardiac stimulation sponds to a 3-dB change
C. Peripheral nerve stimulation D. Point of interest may be greater or less than
D. All of the above the reference value
E. All of the above
A
76. Local thermal injury to a patient during MR
imaging can be caused by ________.
A. Disconnected surface coil lead left on the
patient
B. Patient contact with the inner bore of the
magnet
C. Patients crossing their arms or legs in the
MR imager
D. Implanted metallic foreign objects in the
patient
E. All of the above
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
A Only one answer is correct B Match answers X True/False–any number of answers may be True
53. C
54. A-False
B-True
C-False
D-True
1. Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the radiologist. 6th ed. 13. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. FDA Public Health
Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006. Advisory: avoidance of serious x-ray-induced skin injuries to
2. Bushberg JT, Siebert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The patients during fluoroscopically-guided procedures. Rockville,
essential physics of medical imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Md: Food and Drug Administration, 1994.
Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002. 14. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document
3. American College of Radiology. Disaster preparedness for for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol (in press).
radiology professionals: response to radiological terrorism— American College of Radiology Web site. http://www.acr.org/
a primer for radiologists, radiation oncologists, and medical s_acr/bin.asp?TrackID=&SID=1&DID=25812&CID=3260&VID
physicists. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2002. =2&DOC=File.PDF. Accessed May 4, 2007.
4. Military Medical Operations. Medical management of radiologi- 15. Shellock FG, ed. Magnetic resonance procedures: health effects
cal casualties handbook. 2nd ed. Armed Forces Radiobiology and safety. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press, 2001.
Research Institute Web site. http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/www/ 16. Computed Imaging Devices Branch, Office of Device Evaluation,
outreach/pdf/2edmmrchandbook.pdf. Published April 2003. Center for Devices and Radiologic Health. Guidance for the
Accessed April 23, 2007. submission of premarket notifications for magnetic resonance
5. Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. diagnostic devices: guidance for industry. Food and Drug Ad-
Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. ministration Web site. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/mri340.pdf.
Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Updated November 14, 1998. Accessed April 24, 2007.
Research Council, 1990. 17. Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L. Safety considerations in
6. Hendee WR, Ritenour ER. Medical imaging physics. 4th ed. MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176(3):593–606.
New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, 2002. 18. Hedrick WR, Hykes DL, Starchman DE. Ultrasound physics
7. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. and instrumentation. 4th ed. St Louis, Mo: Elsevier Mosby, 2005.
Medical radiation exposure of pregnant and potentially pregnant 19. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and National
women. NCRP report no. 54. Bethesda, Md: National Council Electrical Manufacturers Association. Standard for real-time
on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1977. display of thermal and mechanical indices on diagnostic
8. Hedrick WR, Feltes JJ, Starchman DE, Berry GC. Managing ultrasound equipment. Rockville, Md: American Institute of
the pregnant radiation worker: a realistic policy for hospitals Ultrasound in Medicine and National Electrical Manufacturers
today. Radiol Manage 1986:8(3):28–34. Association, 1992.
9. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 20. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
Limitations of exposure to ionizing radiation. NCRP report no. Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound. I. Criteria
116. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection based on thermal mechanisms. NCRP report no. 113.
and Measurements, 1993. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements, 1992.
10. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United 21. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Bioeffects and
States. NCRP report no. 93. Bethesda, Md: National Council safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Laurel, Md: American Institute
on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1987. of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1993.
11. Hernanz-Schulman M, Emmons MA, Price RR. Fluoroscopy 22. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
clinical practice: controlling dose and study quality—new Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound. II. Criteria
challenges and opportunities. In: Frush DP, Huda W, eds. based on all known mechanisms. NCRP report no. 140.
2006 Syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic radiology Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and
physics—from invisible to visible: the science and practice of Measurements, 2002.
x-ray imaging and radiation dose optimization. Oak Brook, Ill: 23. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Diagnostic
Radiological Society of North America, 2006; 133–139. ultrasound imaging in pregnancy. NIH publication no. 84-667.
12. Balter S. Teaching radiation safety to invasive fluoroscopists. In: Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, 1984.
Frey GD, Sprawls P, eds. The expanding role of medical physics
in diagnostic imaging: proceedings of the 1997 summer school.
American Association of Physicists in Medicine monograph no.
23. Madison, Wis: Medical Physics Publishing, 1997.