Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How to build
Rules of Mind Mapping
Mind Mapping® has a specific design that is guided
by a simple set of principles. As my first article in
a Mind Map®
issue 12 of TEX demonstrated, it is these principles
that differentiate Mind Mapping from other visual
association tools, such as spider diagrams. The very
features that make it such an effective technique for
rapid learning also make it outstanding as a tool for
promoting clarity of thought and communication.
To get the best out of Mind Mapping, it should be
taught in an understanding and consistent way.
Because the architecture of the map is crucial to
The first article in this series explained its effectiveness, it is important that anyone who
Mind Mapping’s unique features and takes on the role of teaching Mind Mapping has
why they matter. In his second feature, fully integrated its operational design into their
everyday practice. We would not expect to be
Barry Mapp shows you how to
taught French by a person who can’t speak any
construct a Mind Map French and the same principle holds true for Mind
Mapping. Students will learn about the principles
and benefits of Mind Mapping not through being
of the less obvious features of the Mind Map and All about Jim
to identify and help those who are having some
general difficulty with the process.
Sit down with a plain sheet of paper on your
desk and copy this same Mind Map, slowly and
carefully, to get a ‘feel’ for the technique. I recom-
mend that you copy initially without adding any
colour. When your copy is complete, just colour
in one of the branching sections to start with.
Figure 3
This will allow you to notice the power of adding
colour to maps, and how the colour makes a topic
section of the map ‘stand out’ from the rest. This
demonstrates the power and purpose of colour –
to make each grouping on the map stand out. We
all notice features that standout from the back-
ground, we all ‘forget’ features that merge into
the background!
By the way, if you find this copying difficult, start
by tracing the Mind Map. Quite often what we
draw initially is actually very different from what
Figure 4
we are copying. Be aware of this phenomenon.
Betty Edwards1, in her book Drawing on the Right
Side of the Brain, suggests that the reason we are
often poor copiers is because we try to copy on the
‘left-side of our brain’. When we do this, we copy
not what we see in front of us but a symbolic
version of what we see, filtered through prior
habits, beliefs and pre-conceptions (so trace a
Mind Map first, if you think your left brain may
deceive you!).
Once you are happy with your copying, then
move on to the construction phase of the map.
Figure 5
current jobs and so on. The disadvantage of writing trated by Mind Mapping because the traditional
in this (traditional) way is that he has to think about way has worked reasonably well for them and they
and recall all his important relationship issues find this different way of working difficult and
before moving on to the next ‘topic’ of his educa- uncomfortable. In general, the younger the student,
tion and to complete that before moving on to his the less set in their ways they are and the quicker
past jobs etc. He thus needs to complete things they take to the technique.
before moving on to the next area (otherwise things
will be missed out) – a process that considerably Choose your topic
slows down his writing, reduces his productivity So now it’s your turn. Choose your topic and give
and dampens his spontaneity. yourself a good 10 minutes to sit quietly and
This way of working is a reductive approach construct your first Mind Map. When you have
rather than one that creates a ‘synthesis’. With completed the task, think about how easy or difficult
Mind Mapping, ‘synthesis’ is easy. Jim arranges his it was, and how you could do it better next time.
blank paper in landscape format and writes the Compare your finished design structure to the ones
topic ‘Jim’ in the centre of the page. He thinks briefly you have read and copied. Are you managing to
about some of his main topic headings and imme- adhere to the design rules? Probably the trickiest part
diately adds four main branch headings to the is in selecting keywords and the discipline of keeping
map (because these headings immediately spring to just one word on a branch. This becomes easier
into his mind): family, education, work and sport with practise.
(Figure 3) he will think of further headings and add Creating one Mind Map is just a start. In school,
these later. (Remember thoughts actually arrive at I believe it is the teacher’s responsibility to create
random, so the map acts as a ‘thought catcher’). the opportunity for students to use the technique
Jim allows the map to catch his thoughts as they regularly and consistently in classroom situations.
arise, rather than trying to force thoughts in a Some of the ways in which this can be achieved
particular order. This saves him time and keeps will be discussed in the next issue. We can always
the writing in ‘flow’. He works with his ‘butterfly give our students some assignments as Mind
mind’ rather than against it. So, in creating his Maps rather than essays.
Reference
map, he actually flits back and forth between As a final note, Gregory Bateson and others have 1. Drawing on the Right
branches, adding afterthoughts as they arise and suggested that abstraction and categorisation are Side of the Brain, Betty
Edwards, New York:
adding extra ‘twigs’ or new main branches. Notice essential to ‘sense making’. If this is the case, then
Tarcher/Putnam,1989
how Jim has initially worked around the ‘Work’ Mind Mapping actually helps the user to make
branch – perhaps needing more time to chunk this sense of information. It is probably this predisposi-
down, or perhaps this is a bit of a ‘block’ for him tion to help make ‘sense’ (rather than its suggested
(due to his recent redundancy). However, the fact ability to utilise the ‘whole brain’) that makes it
that he may have a thinking or writing block, does such a powerful accelerated learning tool.
not stop him from continuing to work on other When taught and used correctly and appropri-
parts of the map. ately, Mind Mapping works well with students of
By the time he reaches the stage shown in all learning styles and all learning abilities. Age is
Figure 5, he has more or less completed his map no barrier. I have taught Mind Mapping to students
apart from the ‘work’ branch. He is encouraged not of seven to 70 years of age. However, as this article
to focus on this (‘the problem’) but instead focus has outlined, the way in which the technique is
his conscious mind on something else (in this case taught, and how well the teacher understands and Barry Mapp trained with
Tony Buzan in Mental
adding colour to map 6a) allowing his subcon- models the technique, is crucial to student uptake
Literacy and Mind
scious mind to continue to explore the work issue and benefit. Students see lists and bullet points Mapping and runs his
in the background. He also adds a few extra everyday at school and college, so they are encour- own courses in schools,
colleges and business.
doodles to the map at this time. Finally (6b) he is aged to use them. Students need to see Mind Maps
He is a visiting Lecturer
able to add some branches and keywords that in everyday use if they are to be convinced of their at Birmingham
summarise his ‘work’. importance as a serious learning tool. So give your University and Morley
College and a
As Jim is finding out, Mind Mapping is a tech- students a good Mind Mapping environment and, consultant for Dudley
nique that allows him to work in either a linear or after a couple of months of regular use in the Regional Staff College,
a non-linear way, and to have multiple thought classroom, see how their clarity of thought and where he runs modular
workshops for teachers
streams open simultaneously. Non-linear thinking communication improves and how they then and trainers on Mind
and thought multi-tasking are faster methods choose to manage information – bullet points or Mapping and thinking
skills. Barry has worked
than serial, bit-by-bit thinking. Mind Maps. Notice as well what happens to their
with primary schools
Here, Jim has taken to the technique like a duck test scores! integrating the Mind
to water, but he has always been frustrated by tradi- In my next article, I will show you how to use Map technique across
the whole school.
tional ways of working. Be aware, though, that Mind Mapping before, during and after your
Tex@BarryMapp.co.uk
many mature students are actually initially frus- teaching sessions. TEX