Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What is research?
INTRODUCTION
Research is an often-misused term, its usage in everyday language very different
from the strict scientific meaning. In the field of science, it is important to move
away from the looser meaning and use it only in its proper context. Scientific
research adheres to a set of strict protocols and long established structures.
Often, we will talk about conducting internet research or say that we are researching
in the library. In everyday language, it is perfectly correct grammatically, but in
science, it gives a misleading impression. The correct and most common term used
in science is that we are conducting a literature review.
DEFINITION OF RESEARCH :
Research can be defined as a process that is followed by a person to answer either his/her
own queries or somebody else queries about a particular object, person, subject etc.
The person that do the research is known as researcher and the thing about which he/she
is doing research is known as area of research.
When a person has a strong will or keen nature to know about something he/she starts
thinking :
And to answer all these queries, all these why, how, what an individual starts to think
about that particular thing (depending upon his/her area of interest) and this process
continues till he/she comes out with some satisfactory result.
TYPES OF RESEARCH :
Types of research is a very broad concept because almost everything in this world can be
a area of research depending upon one's own interest.
Jacob Yancey
03/16/08
A. Terms
d. "Reviewing the Literature" - finding out about previous research pertinent to the
endeavor. You do this to hopefully avoid repeating a prior experiment and wasting time.
f. Causal Relationships - a direct relationship between one event (cause) and another
event (effect) which is the consequence (result) of the first.
i. Operational definition - a completely explicit description of the means and criteria used
to measure the concept. Must give in all research articles.
k. Deductive Research - having a general conclusion then looking for the data.
l. "Publish or Perish" - must submit research to the scrutiny of your scientific peers.
B. Concept Q's
a. What is the difference between basic and applied research. Which is most likely to
produce breakthroughs in knowledge and theory? Basic research is more likely to
produce breakthroughs. I imagine the reasoning behind this is that when you undertake
research purely to gain information, there is a chance that you will encounter something
completely new. Whereas within applied research the motive seems primarily to enhance
the answers we have for specific practical questions. Applied research would seem
geared toward efficiency, while basic research would seem geared toward pushing the
envelope and encountering perhaps murky, but brand new ideas.
c. What is an operational definition, and how is that distinct from a merely conceptual
definition? An operation definition is a complete, thorough, and explicit description of
the means and criteria used to measure the concept. The conceptual definition is the
broader idea, and the operational definition is the replicable terms of how one has
attempted to measure it.
By stating their operation definitions researchers make it possible for other researchers
to use, criticize, or refine the measurement technique, or to compare results with other
researchers who used different operational definitions to measure the same thing.
Therefore, what makes observations objectively quantifiable is merely that the researcher
has provided an operational definition that makes the measurement technique explicit,
public, and subject to examination by the scientific community.
Part II: Three Basic Types of Research and the Fundamentals of Experimental Design
A. Terms
a. Naturalistic Observation - Observing something within its natural environment without
the subject being aware, or more importantly changing its behavior because of the
observation.
g. Correlations Study - A study in which the researchers measure the type and strength of
relationships among variables that are not under the researchers control. Cannot prove
causation.
j. External Validity - Typically derived from field based research; applicable to outside
world but hard to prove cause and effect; generalizable.
k. Negative or Inverse Correlation - (-1.00) means that the two things never had in
conjunction.
o. Internal Validity - Typically derived from lab experiments, looks to prove cause and
effect, but hard to apply to real world.
q. Inter observer Reliability - assesses the degree to which different raters/observers give
consistent estimates of the same phenomenon. (on a subjective thing like an essay, do
teachers all give within 5 or so points?)
r. Participant Observer Technique - Using a researcher in the experiment as a "fly on the
wall" to participate and observer from inside the experiment. (case studies)
t. Confounding Variable - an EV with additional properties that are correlated with the
IV.
v. Hawthorne Effect - specific version of reluctance in which the IV doesn't cause the
effect, but the awareness of change causes the effect and increases productivity.
ii. Hold EV's constant - involves making sure that some factors are the
iii. Manipulate EV's into IV's - makes a more complex but informative
experiment.
A. Terms
e. Population Mean (or pop true score) - (pop x_) often hypothetical target
f. Statistical Significance - When the researcher can be at least 95% that the effect is
real. Does not equal validity.
g. Sample - means of drawing, randomly or not, people from a given group into an
experiment.
i. Validity (in the context of measurement theory) - Does the operational definition
measure what it is supposed to?
k. Sample Size - The higher the sample size the more likely the results are to be accurate.
Must be at least 20 to be considered an accurate representation of any given group.