You are on page 1of 14

SUM-110

SUMMONS FOR COURT USE ONt y


(SOLO PARA US~ DE LA CORTE)
Cross-Complaint
(CITACION JUDICIAL-CONTRADEMANDA)
NOTICE TO CROSS-DEFENDANT:
(A VISO AL CONTRA-DEMANDADO):
MELODY GILLESPIE

YOU ARE BEING SUED BY CROSS-COMPLAINANT:


(LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL CONTRADEMANDANTE):
THE H.M. WYSOCKI TRUST BY AND THROUGH ITS ETC.ET.AL

You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a
copy served on the cross-complainant. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you
want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more
Information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.r;a.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse
nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may
lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an
attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services
program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California
Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.eourtinfo.ea.govlselfhe/p), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The
court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration aWard of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court's
lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.
Tiene 30 DlA5 DE CALENDARIO despues de que Ie entreguen esta eitseion y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta par esqrito
en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al eontrademandante. Una carta 0 una lIamada te/efonica no 10 protegen. Su respuesta
por escrito tlene que estsr en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que hays un formulario que
usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede eneontrar estos formularios de la corte y mas informaci6n en el Centro de Ayuda de las
Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov). en la biblioteca de leyes de su condacJo 0 en Is corte que Ie quede mas cerea. 5i no puede
pagar la cuota de presentacion, piela al secretarlo de la corte que Ie de un formulario de exenci6n de pago de cuotas. 5i no presenta su
respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el easo por ineumpl/miento y la corte Ie podrfl qultsr su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin mas advertenc/a.
Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que lIame a un abogado inmedlatamente. 51 no conoce a un abogado, puede lIamar a un
servicio de remisi6n a sbogados. 51 no puede psgar a un abogsdo, es poslble que eumpla can 105 requisltos para obtener servicios legales
gratuitos de un programs de servicios legales sin fines de luero. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitl0 web de
California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcallfornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), 0
oniendose en contacto con 18 corte 0 el colegio de abogados locales. A VISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los
costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquler recuperac/6n de $10,000 6 mas de valor raeibida mediante un acuerdo 0 una
coneesi6n de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso.
The name and address of the court is: SHORT NAME OF CASE (from Complaint): (Nombre de caso):

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE


(EI nombre y direcci6n de la corte es): GILLESPIE VS. HOFFMAN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF TULARE CASE NUMBER: (NLimerodeICaso)'

221 S. MOONEY BLVD, VISALIA, CA 93291 10-238961


The name, address, and telephone number of cross-complalnant's attorney, or cross-GomplalOant Without an attorney, IS:
(EI nombre, la direcci6n y el numero de telefono del abogado del contrademandante, 0 del eontrademandante que no tiene
abogado, es):
Robert J. Fletcher, Attorney at Law, P.O. Box 824, Tulare, CA 93275 (559) 684-1795
, Deputy
DATE: _ NOV 1 9 20~O Clerk, by . ~ -, ,., G'_ _op =" (Adjunto)
(Fecha) ••• l'r ~ tV (Secretario) Lal.;.ayne Clee ..k
(For proof of seNiee of this summons, use Proof of Service of Summons (form POS-010).) .
(Para prueba de entrega de esta citation use el formulario Proof of Service of Summons (POS-010).)

00
NOTICE TO THE PERSON SERVED: You are served
[SEAL] 1. as an individual cross-defendant.
2. as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify):

0
oo
3. on behalf of (specify):

0
COURT SEAL
under:
oo CCP 416.10 (corporation)
CCP 416.20 (defunct corporation)
o
CCP 416.60 (minor)
CCP 416.70 (conservatee)

4. 0 o CCP 416.40 (association or partnership)


other (specify):
by personal delivery on (date):
CCP 416.90 (authorized person)

Page 1 of 1
Form Adopted for Mandatory UM §§ 412.20.428.60,465
Judicial Council of CaUfomla $UMMONS-CROSS·COMPLAINT Coda of Civil Procedure.
www.courlinfo.c8.goV
SUM·110 rR~v, Jllly 1. 2009]

Amencan LegaINe!. Inc.


www.FormsWorkffow.com
------.
r )

1 Robert J. Fletcher No. 119770


Attorney at Law FILED
'TUlARE COUNlY SUPERIOR COURT
2 P.O. Box 824 VISALIA DIVISION

Tulare, CA 93274
3 (559) 684-1795 NOV 19 2010
4 Attorney [or Nicklas Hoffman and
LAAAYNE CLEEK, CLERK
the Wysocki Irrevocable Trust
5 BV:------
6 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

7 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TULARE


GILLESPIE
OR
THE EQillTABLE
H.M.
PROPERTY AND
WYSOCKIALL
RIGHT,
)) NICKOL
ADVERSE PERSONS
) IRREVOCABLE
TO )
TITLE,
)Gillespie, )))) )))
Courtney
CLOUD
Case
QIDET No.:
HOFFMAN,
DOES
COURTNEY1
VS.
and
TITLE
8 EJECTMENT, ON
CROSS-COMPLAINT Melody
10-238961
CO-TRUSTEES, AND
THROUGH FOR
DAMAGES
DECLARATORY D.CROSS-
CROSS-COMPLAINANT'S
Cross-defendants
100
GILLESPIE, )
RELIEF,
Defendants
inclusive,
Cross-complainant,
MELODY )
GAL
THE ) )) 1- Nicklas Hoffman; et. al.
SANY
ND

Cross-Complaint to Quiet Title, For Ejectment, For Declaratory Relief and For Damages

Wysocki Irrevocable Trust vs. Gillespie et.al.


(~)
1 COMES NOW cross-complainant, the H.M. Wysocki Trust by and through its

2 Co-Trustees, Nickol D. Gerritsma and Nicklas Hoffman and by way of cross-complaint alleges
3 2.
as follows:
8 1.
2 4 10
724 25
18
19623
51
14
15
17
13
16
12
19
21
20
I.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

EJECTMENT

Cross-complainant is, and at all times mentioned was, the owner in fee pursuant

to that Grant Deed recorded with the office of the Tulare County Recorder on

May 17, 2004 as document number 2004-0046807, a copy of which is attached

hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set

forth at length, and is entitled to possession of all that real property and

improvements thereon located in the County of Tulare, State of California

commonly known as 1831 North Lime Street, Porterville, California, consisting

of approximately ten (l0) acres, more or less, hereinafter referred to as the

"Property" artd is more particularly described as:

Lot 10 of Hermosa Orange Colony, County of Tulare,


State of California, according to the Map thereof
Recorded in Book 2, Page 131 of Maps, Tulare
County Records

A.P.N. 255-230-004

Cross-complainant is ignorant of the true names and capacities of the

cross-defendants sued herein as Does I through 100, inclusive, and therefore sues

these cross-defendants by such fictitious names and will amend this

cross-complaint when that information is discovered. Cross-complainant is

informed and believes and based -~-


lJ..1ereon alleges that each of the cross-defendants

Cross-Complaint to Quiet Title, For E;jectment, For Declaratory Relief and FOl"Damages

Wysocki Irrevocable Trust vs. Gillespie et.aI. Case No. 10-238961


1 Courtney Gillespie) Melody Gillespie and all those cross-defendants designated
2 herein as a Doe is legally responsible for each of the acts, failures to act,
3 circumstances, events and happenings alleged in this cross-complaint.
4 3. Cross-complainant is informed and believes and based thereon alleges that at all
5 times herein mentioned each of the cross-defendants was an agent, servant,
6 employee, partner, joint venturer or surety of each of the remaining
7 cross- defendants, and at all times herein relevant was acting within the scope and
8
purpose of said servant, employment, agency, partnership, joint venture or surety
9 relationship with the full knowledge and consent, either express or implied, of
10 each of the remaining cross-defendants.
11 4. On or about February, 2005, cross-defendants, Courtney Gillespie and Melody
12 Gillespie, entered and took possession of approximately one and three quarters
13
(1-3/4) acres ofthe subject Property and has since that time withheld possession
14
of this occupied Property from cross-complainant. This occupancy was initiated
15
under an orally contemplated sales agreement which was understood by the
16 parties would be fully set forth in writing at such point as a full and final
17 agreement would be reached by all the parties wherein the different contingencies,
18 known or unknown, were satisfied. This negotiation process resulted in only two
19 written memorandums which are the documents attached hereto as Exhibit B,
20
entitled "Agreement to Terms" and Exhibit C, entitled "Installment Note Secured
21 by Deed of Trust" each of which documents are incorporated herein by this
22 reference as though fully set forth at length.
23 5. The document entitled "Agreement to Terms') (Exhibit B) was the only document
24
actually signed by both cross-defendant Courtney Gillespie and Wysocki Tru~t
25
co-trustee, Nicklas Hoffinan. N~}?erson associated with Wysocki Trust ever

Cross-Complaint to Quiet Title, fi()f Ejectment, For Declaroltory I{elief and For Damages

Wysocki Irrevocable Trust vs. Gillespie et.al. Case No. 10-238961


'J

1 6. signed acceptance of the document entitled "Installment Note Secured by Deed of


7 1086
16
220
17
9
121322
24
25
513
414
23
15
21
19
181
Trust" (Exhibit C) which was only signed and offered by cross-defendant,

Courtney Gillespie. Cross~defendant, Melody Gillespie, never signed either of

these two documents. Cross-complainant, Nickol D. Gerritsma, likewise never

signed either of these two documents.

On or about January 10, 2006, Wysocki Trust co-trustee, Nicklas Hoffman, after

tendering and delivering a full refund of sums previously paid by

cross-defendants, wrote "VOID LATE 2005" across the face of the document

entitled "Installment Note Secured by Deed of Trust"(Exhibit C) and delivered it

back to cross-defendant Courtney Gillespie and informed said cross-defendant

that the ongoing negotiations for the contemplated sales agreement were

terminated. The terms that existed in the negotiation prior to, and at, this time 0

termination contemplated that the cross-defendants would purchase half of the

approximately ten (l0) acres owned by cross-complainant and that

cross-defendants would not have to pay any cash money as a down payment if the
cross-defendants would apply for and obtain the contemplated subdivision of the

Property in a configuration acceptable to all parties and to the County of Tulare

all at cross-defendants' own personal expense. Under the Installment Note

(Exhibit C), which had been prepared by cross-defendants and presented by

cross-defendants, the cross-defendants had proposed paying $600.00 per month at

seven (7) percent interest, and did pay the sum of $4,800.00, but failed to take any

material action to obtain the requisite sub-division approval by either the

cross-complainant or the County of Tulare which led to the tender and delivery of

a check for fun refund of the said SlUll paid, voidance of the proffered Installment

Note (Exhibit C) and termination of the negotiation for sale.


-4·

Cross-Complaint to Quiet Title, For Ejectment, For Declaratory Relief and For Damages

Wysocki Irrevocable Trust vs. Gillespie et.al. Case No. 10-238961


1 7. At no time mentioned herein has any land sales agreement been accepted by

2 cross-complainant nor has there been any recording of any land sales document
3
with the office of the Tulare County Recorder, nor has there been any change in
4
the real property tax status with the office of the Tulare County Assessor nor has
5 any "Deed of Trust" as contemplated by the offered "Installment Note Secured by
6 Deed of Trust" (Exhibit C) ever been prepared or executed or delivered or
7 accepted or recorded by any of the parties of this action.
8 8. Following the above referenced termination of negotiations for sale,
9 cross-defendants remained in possession of the approximately one and three
10 quarters (1-3/4) acres living in their travel trailer they had parked on this Property
11 and paying for Nicklas Hoffman's own personal electrical services direct to the

12 electrical service company, all in lieu of any other cash rental payments to
13 cross-complainant, all of which was with the oral permission by
14
cross-complainant until on or about December, 2009 at which time
15 cross-defendants breached this oral tenancy by installing an electrical sub-panel
16 on the electrical service panel over the objections by cross-complainant's
17 co-trustee, Nicklas Hoffman, and by refusing to relinquish possession of the
18 occupied property to cross-complainant or enter into a formal written rental

19 agreement for the occupied property all as requested by cross-complainant by and


20 through its co-trustee, Nicklas Hoffman, who fIrst made the request to
21 cross-defendants in August, 2009 and continued periodically to make this request
22 through the time of cross-defendants' fInal breach in December, 2009 by virtue of

23 the installation of the above referenced electrical sub-panel. At all times


24
mentioned herein cross-complainant has performed all obligations required to be
25 perfo1'lut:d or is excused from further perfonnance by cross-defendants' breach.
-5-

Cruss-Complainllo Quiet Title, For Ejectment, For Declaratory Reliefand For Damages

Wysocki Irrevocable Trust vs. Gillespie et.al. Case No. ] 0-238961


1 9. Because cross-defendants continue to withhold possession of the Property,
2 cross-complainant has been denied the use and occupation of the Property to
3 cross-complainant's damage in the approximate sum of$1,200.00 per month
4
according to proof and will continue to sustain damages in the sum of
5 approximately $1,200.00 per month as long as cross-defendants withhold
6 possession of the property from cross-complainant.
7

8 II.

9 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION


10 DECLARATORY RELIEF
11 10. Cross-complainant hereby incorporates by this reference each allegation in
12
Paragraphs 1 - 8 of the first caus€(of action above as though fully set forth at
13 length.
14 11. An actual and justiciable controversy now exists between the parties as to their
15 respective rights and duties under the above described oral tenancy and proposed
16 sale agreements. Cross-complainant contends, and cross-defendants deny, that
17
cross-defendants have no right to require cross-complainant to transfer any title
18 interest to any portion of the subject Property to themselves because a full and
19 complete land sale agreement was never finalized between the parties and ,because
20
the cross-defendants failed to make any material progress towards obtaining, and
2J did not obtain, either agreement to, or authority for, a sub-division lot split
22
acceptable by both cross-complainant and by the County of Tulare.
23
Cross-defendants contend, an~t cross-complainant denies, that a full and complete
24
land sale agreement was entered into by all relevant parties and that
25 cross-defendants are entitled to require specific performance of this contended
-6-

Cross-Complaint to Quiet Title, For Ejectment, For Declaratory Relief and For D;:Images

Wysocki Irrevocable Trust vs. Gillespie et.al. Case No. 10-238961


!.~)

1 agreement. Possession, or return of possession, of the approximately one and


2 three quarters (1-3/4) acres actually occupied by the cross-defendants is urged by
3 each of the contending paJties in accordance with this stated controversy.

4 12. Cross-complainant desires ajudicial determination of cross-complainant's rights


5 and duties under the proposed land sale agreement and a declaration of its
6 non-existence or invalidity or its enforceability or non-enforceability or both.
7 13. A judicial determination and declaration is appropriate and necessary at this time
8 in order that the parties may ascertain their respective rights and duties there
9 under.

10 III.
11 TIDRD CAUSE OF ACTION

12 QUIET TITLE
13 14. Cross-complainant hereby incorporates by this reference each allegation in
14
Paragraphs 1 - 8 of the first cause of action and Paragraph 11 of the second cause
15 of action above as though fully set forth at length.
16 15. Cross-complainant seeks to quiet title against the claims of cross-defendants and
17 each of them as aforesaid. Cross-defendants claims are without any right and
18 cross-defendants have no right, title, estate, lien or interest in the above described
19 Property all without exception.
20 16. Cross-complainant does not know the exact names, capacities or interests in the
2] Property of certain of the cross-defendants which cross-complainant designates
22 for this action as "all persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable right, title,
23 estate, lien or interest in the Property adverse to cross-complainant's title, or any
24
cloud on cross-complainant's title to the Property." Cross·complainant seeks to
25
4ui~t title in the Property against -7-
the claims of each such cross-defendant and

Cross-Complaint to Quiet Title, For Ejectment, For Declaratory Relief and For Damuges

Wysocki Irrevocable Trust vs. Gillespie et.al. Case No. 10-238961


each such cross-defendant has no right, title, estate, lien or interest in the Property
2 or any part of it. Cross-complainant will serve this class of cross-defendants by
3 publication as the Court allows.
4 17. Cross-complainant seeks to quiet title against all cross-defendants and each of
5 them as of January 10, 2006 which is the date on which the document attached
6 hereto as Exhibit C was delivered back to cross-defendants marked

7 "VOID LATE 2005" and the sales negotiation was terminated by


8 cross-complainant.
9 18. The claim of cross-defendants is contingent and uncertain in that at no time

10 mentioned herein has any land sales agreement been accepted by


11
cross-complainant nor has there been any recording of any land sales document
12 with the office of the Tulare County Recorder, nor has there been any change in
13 the real property tax status with the office ofthe Tulare County Assessor nor has
14 any "Deed of Trust" as contemplated by the "Installment Note Secured by Deed
15 of Trust" (Exhibit C) ever been prepared or executed or delivered or accepted
16 or recorded by any of the parties of this action.

17 WHEREFORE CROSS-COMPLAINANT PRAYS as follows,

18 On the :first cause of action:

19 1. That this Court decree that cross-complainant is entitled to have and recover
20
possession of the Property described in Paragraph I of this cross-complaint,
21 2. That this Court issue its Writ of Execution directed to the Sheriff of Tulare

22 County, California directing the Sheriff to remove cross-defendants and all those
23
claiming by, through or under cross-defendants and to place cross-complainant in
24 possession of the Property;
25
-8-

Cross-Complainl to Quiet Title, For Ejeclment, For Dec1aratl}ry Rcliehnd For Damag~s

Wysocki Irrevocable Tru3t Y3. Gillespie et.a1. Cl:lst: No. 10-238961


I _
'----)

3. For an award ofdainages for cross-defendants' wrongful withholding of the


2
premises in the sum of $40.00 per day from and after December, 2009 according
3 to proof until delivery of possession of the Property,
4 4. For costs of suit and prejudgment interest according to proof, and
5 5. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper according to
6 proof.
7 On the second cause of action:

8 6. That this Court decree that the subject land sale agreement is void and of no legal
9 effect,
10 7. For costs of suit and prejudgment interest according to proof, and
11 8. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper according to
12
proof.
13 On the third cause of action:

14 9. That this Court decree that all money or money equivalent paid by
15
cross-defendant since entering into possession of that portion of the subject
16
Property occupied by cross-defendants shall be retained by cross-complainant as
17
payment for the fair rental value of the Property according to proof,
18 10. For damages at the rate of $40.00 per day, from and after December, 2009
19
according to proof, for cross·defendants' wrongful detention of the premises until
20
such time as the premises are restored to cross-complainant,
21 11. For a judgment that cross-complainant is the sole owner of the property and that
22
cross-defendants have no interest in the Property adverse to cross-complainant or
23 any other interest,
24 12. For costs of suit and prejudgment interest according to proof, and
25
-9-

Cross-Complaint to Quiet Title, For Ejectment, For Declaratory Relief and For Damages

Wysocki irrevocable Tmst vs. Gillespie et.aL Case No. 10-238961


1 13. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper according to
2 proof.
3

4 THE H.M. WYSOCKI IRREVOCABLE TRUST

5 Dated: t 1- )~ -' )D
126 14 Dated:Jj
9713
118
Dated: \ \ ......\~. -l~ - L.t7(O
D J

BY:~~ iCkol D. Gerritsma, Co-Trustee """'"


10

By:~Jj~·
Nicklas Hoffinan,~----

VERIFICATION

15 I, Nicklas Hoffman, hereby declare as follows:

16
1. I am a co-trustee of the H.M. Wysocki Irrevocable Trust and I make this
17
declaration of my own personal knowledge. If called I could and would testify competently
18
hereto.
19
2. I have read the foregoing cross-complaint and know its contents. The same is true
20
to the best of my knowledge, information and/or belief.
21
I declare under penalty of peljury under the laws of the State of California that the
22
foregoing is true and correct.
23

24

25

Cross-Complaint to Quiet Title, For Ejectment, For Declaratory Relief and For Damages

Wysocki Irrevocable Trust vs. Gillespie et.al. Case No. 10-238961


- RECORDING REO~~D BY
tIv·
11II110111111111_111·
..._ .. _, CHICAGO TJ:TLE COMPANY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAD.. TO
2004---004&8.7
Rtt:ordtd I RECFEE
f;;;COLE D. GERRIT~, TRUSTEE " Official Records J TAX 1•••
95.7'
1614 N. BRADLEY Coanty Of I
Tedan I
VISALiA, CA 93292 6REGORY B. ~ I
Recorder I
J
INt
08:81AM 17-ffay-28fM 'Pas, 2 of 2

L
Escrow No. 1057379 - SRS
QIder No! 1057372 - ED

Maeuor'! Parcel No:


.f} P Ai ~.:ss- ()~.9-X- Pi GRANT DEED 255-230-004
nm UNDBRSIGNED ORA.WOR(S) D.:ea.ARE(S)

o
DOCUMENl'AAY TRANSPBR. TAX IS $95.70
Wlincmporaled aRa 00 Otyof PORTERv:ILLR
o
IX] computed Ofttfl~fulhalue of(he iltt=uorproperty~ or is
ccmpukd 011tbeMJ whae Jess the value oflieDI or enaambraDccs rauiniog at time of sale, and

FOR
ANNE M. AM:INTER,
VALUABLE CONSIDERATION.
TRUSTEe ~
ONDER -TIm ANNE M.ofwbich
MINTERis herebYaclalow1cdacd.
LIVDlG '!'RUS'!"- BSTABL:ISHBI> NOVEMBER
2, 1998

hereby GRANT(S) to.


NICKOL D. GERR:ITSMA, TRtfSTBB OF THB H. M. WYSOCKI IRREVOCABLE TROST

the foll~ describedreal property in the City of PORTERVILLE'


Countyof TOLARB , State of California:

LO'l' 1.0 OF HERMOSA OlUWGB COLONY, COUNTY OF TULARE, S'l'ATE OF CALlPOllNXA, ACCORDmG TO
THE MAP THEREOF RBCORD2D m BOOK 2, PAGE 131 OF MAPS, '1'tJIlARB COON'l'Y RECORDS.

APN NO. 255-230-004

Dated May 4, 2004 ANNE M. MIN'1'BR, TROSTlE UNPElt 'l'BE


ANNE H. MiN'1')m x,IVING TROST

per1lClnally known to me (of' proved 10 me on the b8Iia Of IItiaftC:ft)ry


8v1det1ce) to be 1he Per8On(8) wtloee narne(a) 'sf.re aubecrlbed to the
within instnlment and acknowledged to me ~ heJrstra/they executed the
same in tflsfher/fMlr authorized capacUy(les). and that by hlsjhlr/th8Il
8ignature(s) on 111. Instrument 1118pet'BOn(a). 01 tha entity upon behalf Of
which the pet1On(.) ectad. execuled the Instrument.

gmv
~~ .... Of &iy \J..J~.,
hand and official teal.
IJ-/lrntS
Da1eMYcom EiPiia FOR NOTAA'i SEAL OR ~
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO PARTY SHOWN ON FOlLOWING UNE: IF NO PARTY SO SHOWN. MAlt. IS OIAECTED ABOVE

City, SUIte &Z1p


i

---'"

A & f-C C· yvt[l'j \


TO
1?ri·~·.tate cr.-ansier of prcpert::{ rights ;.,it.hin TrtlSt.. Acceptan.ce of first
~~~'m.~~~1~:I~~l~=8~·~~~2~r~~~~~~t~f a;~o~e~~y p~~~~~e~O a~~t~~~~y
p~~J. ~~~;~~ I
of Tulare with the oblig~tions incurred thereby. Tulare County APN255- j
238 -004. j
Property Description:
fE2t aithe east half
Of the approximately 10 acre parcel the
ar.d that part of the west half excluding
south 120
the north
I
~
:.20 feet.

P2.y-ments shall be a minimum of $600/mcnth with a 7% apr and all due on


:1-15-2012 (7yrs). Tax obligation (State rent) 13 retroacti·..:e t;'\
possession and portion shall be due upon demand per County of Tulare.

Ttis isa private law document, any adjudication shall be assigned only
by the church 'at Kaweah board of elders or other body 0:: Christi;:; .."'1 me!~
per lCor 6 :1.
I hereby accept: the above terms and position of trustee of the H. f.'l.
Wj/socki Trust ~

1331 ~ LIME S'!

5 ACRES AT R~ 245 & AVE ~71


;J.·-10-:llI05 b~g~~ h~l.nc.
?~aut data
3-01.-05 int.r&Gt ~aer~ed (7%- x_oo5a/~~·) 3.:;.a.

pill.y;:.~nt
Balance .

-I

I
.~
I

••
()
;~ -_. __~ .._.,_"
::
~ ..~_. _._- __~_._~,_.~.- ..__ ·_~v~~v.~.·~·.·~_~~~~ ~~_~.~ __ .·_~ _.-_ ..,.~. __~
5
I
-r;-o-:t-q--;Y-[-:C-E-·~-<::-T-R-O-_l-"
-T-H-I-S-'
TtuS~ musi be s~-rendered-.-~-(j-'.I'-E-· -: -\'I-h-e-n-p-a-i-o.-'
with a req~est ,--t-h-i-S-N-~-q-t-e-.-a-n-_-d-t-h-e-D-e-e-d-71Il
for reconveYfucce_ . ~.
~

:~
Installment Note Secured by Deed of Trust

.f:...

You might also like