Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assemblage and diversity of filamentous fungi on leaf Kallichroma tethys and Verruculina enalia) and seven
and woody litter accumulated on the floor of two man- anamorphic taxa (Arthrinium sp., Aspergillus sp. 1, Cir-
grove forests (Nethravathi and Udyavara) in the south- renalia pygmea, Cirrenalia tropicalis, Penicillium sp.,
west coast of India have been studied. Leaf and woody Periconia prolifica and Trichocladium alopallonellum)
litter collected during summer and monsoon seasons belonging to core-group fungi (frequency of occurrence,
incubated in the laboratory (2, 8, 16 and 32 weeks) 10%) were identified. Woody litter collected during
yielded 78 taxa belonging to 32 ascomycetes and 46 mito- summer season showed highest fungal diversity than
sporic fungi. Significant difference (ANOVA) was seen during monsoon. Rarefaction estimates of expected
in the frequency of occurrence of fungal taxa in diffe- number of fungal taxa out of 150 isolates were higher
rent incubation periods of leaf litter (P = 0.179 × 10–5 to in woody litter than leaf litter. Sporulation of terrestrial
0.24 × 10–5) and woody litter (P = 0.887 × 10–8 to 0.0326). fungi, marine fungi and arenicolous fungi (sand-inhabit-
The number of fungal taxa per leaf litter ranged from ing) was successional on leaf and woody litter. Terres-
1 to 5, while for woody litter it was 1 to 8. Mean number trial fungi sporulated within eight weeks and declined
of fungal taxa per wood ranged between 2.5 and 3.6, thereafter, sporulating marine fungi were highest dur-
which is higher than that in the mangroves of the Indian ing 16 weeks, while arenicolous fungi attained a peak
Ocean and South East Asia. Seven ascomycetes (Anip- after 32 weeks of incubation. Substrate preference, suc-
todera chesapeakensis, Aniptodera sp., Arenariomyces cession, competition and techniques of study of mangrove
parvulus, Lulworthia grandispora, Savoryella lignicola, filamentous fungi have been discussed.
MANGROVES are highly productive ecosystems next to the Materials and methods
coral reefs and provide energy to marine habitats through
production and decomposition of plant detritus1,2. Litter Study area and sampling
biomass in mangrove forests3,4 ranges between 0.011 and
23.69 t h–1 y–1. Studies have been carried out on fungal Nethravathi and Udyavara mangroves in the southwest
colonization and the pattern of decomposition of mangrove coast of India were chosen for the study. Nethravathi is situa-
leaf litter5–10 and woody litter10–14. However, a few quan- ted south of Mangalore (12°50′00″N, 74°50′00″E) and its
titative studies are available on fungal association with major part has been denuded due to human interference
mangrove litter in the Indian coast (west coast15–18; east (tile and wood factories, railways, agriculture and aqua-
coast19,20). Raghukumar et al.16 studied the sequence of col- culture). Recently, part of this mangrove area has been reve-
onization, densities and biomass of fungi, thraustochytrids getated. Common mangrove plant species include Rhizophora
and bacteria on leaf litter of Rhizophora apiculata at Caorao mucronata and Avicennia officinalis. Udyavara is located
mangrove, Goa. Several studies on mangroves in India re- north of Mangalore (13°17′50″N, 74°44′32″E) with large
ported either marine fungi19,20 or terrestrial fungi21,22. It is mangrove vegetation. Acanthus ilicifolius, A. officinalis
evident that both marine and terrestrial fungi are involved and R. mucronata are the major mangrove species. Dry
in mangrove litter decomposition23. Terrestrial fungi in man- season (summer) starts during February, while wet season
grove habitats are ignored as transient mycota24,25. There- (monsoon) during June. Dead leaf and woody litter accu-
fore, the current study aims at understanding (i) the richness mulated on the mangrove floor (about 0.25 km2 area) were
and diversity of filamentous fungi on randomly collected randomly sampled three months after initiation of summer
leaf and woody litter of two mangrove forests in the south- (May 2000) and three months after initiation of monsoon
west coast of India during summer and monsoon seasons; (September 2000). They were pooled in sterile polythene
(ii) the succession of fungal sporulation on mangrove litter bags and brought to the laboratory for fungal assessment.
at different intervals of incubation.
Incubation, observation and data analyses
Each leaf and wood was incubated (25 ± 2°C) separately
*For correspondence. (e-mail: sirikr@yahoo.com) in polythene bags containing sterile sand wetted with sterile
CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 87, NO. 10, 25 NOVEMBER 2004 1431
RESEARCH ARTICLE
50% sea water. They were screened under a stereomicro- revealed significant difference in the frequency of occurrence
scope for the fungal structures at different intervals of incu- of fungal taxa during different incubation periods of leaf litter
bation (2, 8, 16 and 32 weeks) and the sporulated fungi were (Nethravathi, P = 0.24 × 10–5; Udyavara P = 0.179 × 10–5) as
identified. well as woody litter (Nethravathi, P = 0.887 × 10–8; Udya-
Per cent frequency of occurrence of each fungus and vara, P = 0.0326).
mean number of fungi per litter sample were calculated: Among 13 core-group fungi (>10%) on mangrove litter,
Arenariomyces parvulus and Cirrenalia pygmea were
Frequency of occurrence (%) = dominant on leaf as well as woody litter (Table 1). Arthri-
Total number of leaf or wood colonized by a specific fungus nium sp. was restricted to leaf litter, while Kallichroma
Total number of leaf or wood supporting sporulating fungi tethys and Verruculina enalia were confined to woody litter.
× 100. Aspergillus sp. 1, Cirrenalia tropicalis, Lulworthia gran-
dispora, Penicillium sp. and Trichocladium alopallonellum
Mean number of fungi per sample = were dominant on leaf litter, while Aniptodera chesa-
Total number of fungal isolations peakensis, Periconia prolifica and Savoryella lignicola
. were dominant on woody litter. Based on the frequency of
Total number of leaf or wood sporulating fungi
occurrence in summer and monsoon, 12 fungi were consi-
dered as core-group fungi. Aniptodera chesapeakensis, Are-
One-way ANOVA was employed to determine the differ-
nariomyces parvulus, Arthrinium sp., C. pygmea, L. grandi-
ences in the frequency of occurrence of fungal taxa based
spora and T. alopallonellum were dominant during summer
on sporulation at different incubation periods26.
as well as monsoon seasons. Aniptodera sp. was dominant in
Diversity of fungi on litter during monsoon and summer
summer, while Aspergillus sp. 1, C. tropicalis, Penicillium
seasons was assessed based on the diversity indices27:
sp., P. prolifica and V. enalia were dominant during monsoon.
Simpson diversity, D′ = 1/Σ(pi)2 and Shannon diversity,
The mean number of fungal taxa per sample of leaf and
H′ = –Σ(pilnpi), where pi is the proportion of individuals
wood was 2.4 (range 2.1–2.6) and 3 (range: 2.5–3.6) res-
that taxa i contributes to the total.
pectively (Table 2). The number of taxa per leaf litter
The evenness was expressed by: J′ = H′/H′max, where
ranged from 1 to 5, while for woody litter it was 1 to 8
H′max is the maximum value of diversity for the number of
(Figure 2). Maximum leaf and woody litter (33.8 and
taxa present28.
26%) was colonized by three taxa. Leaf litter of Nethra-
To compare species richness among the isolations on
vathi mangrove showed the highest fungal diversity during
substrata during two seasons, rarefaction indices were
summer, while for Udyavara it was during monsoon. On
calculated29. The expected number of fungal taxa, E(t), in
woody litter of both locations, summer samples showed
a random sample of n isolations taken from a total popu-
the highest diversity. The rarefaction estimates of expected
lation of N isolations was calculated using the formula:
number of species out of 150 isolations were consistently
higher on woody litter irrespective of substrata and season
s N − ni N
E(t) = ∑ 1 − ,
(Table 2, Figure 3).
i =1 n n Fungal taxa on leaves and woody litter comprised ter-
restrial, marine and arenicolous (sand-inhabiting) fungi.
where ni is the number of isolations of the ith taxa. The pattern of sporulation of these fungi at different dura-
tions of incubation is given in Figure 4. More mitosporic
fungi sporulated at initial phases of incubation followed by
Results ascomycetes and arenicolous fungi. By and large, maxi-
mum terrestrial fungi sporulated during eight weeks and
Altogether 78 fungal taxa were recovered from leaf and declined thereafter. Sporulating marine fungi peaked dur-
woody litter. Out of 473 isolations from leaf litter, 45 taxa ing 16 weeks and declined subsequently, except on woody
and among 599 isolations from woody litter, 65 taxa were litter of Udyavara. Sporulating arenicolous fungi reached
obtained (Tables 1 and 2). Samples collected during summer a peak at 32 weeks of incubation.
showed maximum fungi (68 taxa) than those collected
during monsoon (55 taxa). Per cent fungal taxa and cumu-
lative fungal taxa sporulated on litter at different periods Discussion
of incubation are given in Figure 1. Sporulating fungi on
leaf litter attained a peak during 8 or 16 weeks and decli- The occurrence of core-group fungi in our study corrobo-
ned thereafter, while on woody litter such drastic decline rates with earlier investigations17,18. It is predicted that
was not seen. Cumulative taxa between 16 and 32 weeks among fungal species in a community, core-group fungi
showed slight increase. The frequency of occurrence was exert major influence on turnover of litter in mangrove
highest on leaves at eight weeks incubation, while on ecosystem. Perhaps fungi colonized on leaf and woody
wood, it was at 16 weeks incubation. One-way ANOVA litter may have different vegetative and reproductive stra-
1432 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 87, NO. 10, 25 NOVEMBER 2004
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Table 1. Frequency of occurrence (%) of filamentous fungi on leaf and woody litter of Nethravathi and Udyavara mangroves in the west coast of India
Ascomycetes
Arenariomyces parvulus Koch 11.1, 15.8 36.4, 10.5 15.1, 7.8 5.7, 15.9 18.5, 11.1 17.1, 12.5
Lulworthia grandispora Meyers 35.6, 18.4 0, 15.8 9.1, 7.8 3.8, 4.6 17.5, 6.3 12.1, 11.7
Aniptodera chesapeakensis Shearer et Miller 11.1, 7.9 6.1, 10.5 18.2, 20.3 5.7, 11.4 8.9, 13.9 10.3, 12.5
Verruculina enalia (Kohlm.) Kohlm. et Volkm.-Kohlm. 0, 0 0, 0 19.7, 28.1 3.8, 22.7 0, 18.6 5.9, 12.7
Sovoryella lignicola Eaton et Jones 0, 0 6.1, 2.6 15.1, 23.4 7.6, 6.8 2.2, 13.2 7.2, 8.2
Aniptodera sp. 6.7, 0 15.1, 0 10.6, 0 9.4, 18.2 5.5, 9.6 10.5, 4.6
Kallichroma tethys (Kohlm. et Kohlm.) 0, 0 0, 0 10.6, 7.8 5.7, 22.7 0, 11.7 4.1, 7.6
Kohlm. et Volkm.-Kohlm.
Savoryella paucispora (Cribb et Cribb) Koch 0, 0 7.9, 0 4.6, 7.8 9.4, 11.4 2, 8.3 5.5, 4.8
Corollospora maritima Werdermann 2.2, 0 3, 0 10.6, 4.7 1.9, 11.4 1.3, 7.2 4.4, 4
Leptosphaeria australiensis (Cribb et Cribb) Hughes 11.1, 0 3, 0 4.6, 0 9.4, 0 3.3, 3.5 7, 0
Corollospora pulchella Kohlm., Schmidt et Nair 0, 0 3, 0 6.1, 0 3.8, 13.6 0.8, 5.9 1.3.4
Corollospora angusta Nakagiri et Tokura 0, 10.5 0, 0 6.1, 4.7 0, 0 2.6, 2.7 1.5, 3.8
Ascomycete sp. 1 4.4, 0 9.1, 0 0, 0 7.6, 0 3.4, 1.9 5.3, 0
Buergenerula sp. 4.4, 10.5 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 3.7, 0 1.1, 2.6
Lignincola laevis Höhnk 0, 0 0, 0 0, 3.1 9.4, 0 0, 3.1 2.4, 0.8
Lulworthia sp. 0, 0 0, 0 3, 0 9.4, 0 0, 3.1 3.1, 0
Torpedospora radiata Meyers 0, 0 0, 0 4.6, 0 0, 6.8 0, 2.9 1.2, 1.7
Mycosporella salicorniae (Auerswald) Petrak 0, 0 0, 7.9 0, 0 1.9, 0 2, 0.5 0.5, 2
Ascosalsum cincinnatula (Shearer et Crane) Campb., 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 1.9, 6.8 0, 2.2 0.5, 1.7
Anderson et Shearer
Dactylospora haliotrepha (Kohlm. et Kohlm) Hafellner 0, 0 3, 0 1.5, 0 3.8, 0 0.8, 1.3 2.1, 0
Didymosphaera lignomaris Strongman et Miller 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 7.6, 0 0, 1.9 1.9, 0
Etheirophora unijubata Kohlm. et Volkm.-Kohlm. 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 3.8, 2.3 0, 1.5 1, 0.6
Mycosphaerella apophlaeae Kohlm. 0, 0 6.1, 0 0, 0 0, 0 1.5, 0 1.5, 0
Panorbis viscosa (Schmidt) Campb., Anderson et Shearer 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 5.7, 0 0, 1.4 1.4, 0
Arenariomyces trifurcatus Höhnk 0, 0 0, 0 1.5, 0 3.8, 0 0, 1.3 1.3, 0
Biflua physasca Koch et Jones 0, 0 0, 5.3 0, 0 0, 0 1.3, 0 0, 1.3
Mycosporella staticicola (Patouillard) Dias 0, 0 3, 0 0, 1.5 0, 0 0.8, 0.4 0.8, 0.4
Lindra marinera Meyers 4.4, 0 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 1.1, 0 1.1, 0
Corollospora sp. 0, 0 0, 0 3, 0 0, 0 0, 0.8 0.8, 0
Corollospora cinnamomea Koch 0, 0 0, 2.6 0, 0 0, 0 0.7, 0 0, 0.7
Littospora ratnagiriensis (Patil et Borse) Campb., 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 1.9, 0 0, 0.5 0, 5, 0
Anderson et Shearer
Natiantispora retorquens (Shearer et Crane) Campb., 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 1.9, 0 0, 0.5 0.5, 0
Anderson et Shearer
Halographis runica Kohlm. et Volkm.-Kohlm. 0, 0 0, 0 0, 1.6 0, 0 0, 0.4 0, 0.4
Halosarpheia sp. 0, 0 0, 0 1.5, 0 0, 0 0, 0.4 0.4, 0
Leptosphaeria oraemaris Linder 0, 0 0, 0 0, 1.6 0, 0 0, 0.4 0, 0.4
Ascomycete sp. 2 0, 0 0, 0 1.5, 0 0, 0 0, 0.4 0.4, 0
Mitosporic fungi
Cirrenalia pygmea Kohlm. 13.3, 18.4 6.1, 10.5 27.3, 21.9 20.8, 13.6 12.1, 20.9 16.9, 16.1
Arthrinium sp. 37.8, 36.8 24.2, 29 0, 0 0, 0 32, 0 15.5, 16.4
Aspergillus sp. 1 20, 44.7 0, 18.4 1.5, 0 5.7, 15.9 20.8, 5.8 6.8, 19.8
Trichocladium alopallonellum (Kohlm. et Kohlm.) 11.1, 10.5 30.3, 15.8 4.6, 12.5 7.6, 13.6 16.9, 9.6 13.4, 13.1
Kohlm. et Volkm.-Kohlm.
Periconia prolifica Anastasiou 8.9, 0 3, 18.4 9.1, 17.2 3.8, 11.4 7.6, 10.1 6.2, 11.8
Cirrenalia tropicalis Kohlm. 2.2, 0 6.1, 7.9 13.6, 34.4 0, 0 4.1, 12 5.5, 10.6
Penicillium sp. 0, 29 0, 13.2 4.6, 1.6 0, 13.6 10.6, 5 1.2, 14.4
Zalerion varium Anastasiou 0, 0 0, 15.8 12.1, 1.6 5.7, 18.2 4, 9.4 4.5, 8.9
Alternaria sp. 1 2.2, 13.2 6.1, 2.6 4.6, 6.1 5.7, 0 6, 4.1 4.7, 5.5
Mitosporic fungus 15.6, 0 12.1, 5.3 0, 3.1 3.8, 0 8.3, 1.7 7.9, 2.1
Trichocladium sp. 1 2.2, 7.9 0, 0 4.6, 4.7 1.9, 18.2 2.5, 7.4 2.2, 7.7
Zalerion maritimum (Linder) Anastasiou 0, 0 6.1, 2.6 10.6, 7.8 9.4, 2.4 2.2, 7.6 6.5, 3.2
Aspergillus sp. 2 2.2, 18.4 0, 13.2 0, 0 0, 4.6 8.5, 1.2 0.6, 9.1
Trichocladium achrasporum (Meyers et Moore) Dixon 6.7, 10.5 6.1, 10.5 3, 0 0, 0 8.5, 0.8 3.4, 5.3
Alternaria sp. 2 8.9, 7.9 0, 2.6 6.1, 3.1 0, 0 4.9, 2.3 3.4, 3.4
(Contd…)
Clavatospora bulbosa (Anast.) Nakagiri et Tubaki 0, 0 6.1, 5.3 6.1, 4.7 3.8, 0 2.9, 3.7 4, 2.5
Alternaria sp. 3 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 17, 9.1 0, 6.5 4.3, 2.3
Zygosporium masonii 0, 7.9 0, 6.1 1.5, 3.1 5.7, 0 3.5, 2.6 1.8, 4.3
Fusarium oxysporum Schl. et Fries 4.4, 15.8 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 5.1, 0 1.1, 4
Nigrospora oryzae (Berk. et Br.) Petch 17.8, 0 0, 0 0, 1.6 0, 0 4.5, 0.4 4.4, 0.4
Monodictys pelagica (Johnson) Jones 0, 2.6 0, 2.6 6.1, 3.1 3.8, 0 1.3, 3.3 2.5, 2.1
Pestalotiopsis sp. 4.4, 10.5 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 3.7, 0 1.1, 2.6
Phoma sp. 1 0, 0 0, 0 3, 3.1 3.8, 4.6 0, 3.6 1.7, 1.9
Cladosporium sp. 3 11.1, 0 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 2.8, 0 2.8, 0
Cladosporium oxysporum Berk. et Curt. 4.4, 0 0, 0 0, 3.1 0, 2.3 1.1, 1.4 1.1, 1.4
Periconia sp. 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 9.4, 0 0, 2.4 2.4, 0
Fusarium sp. 1 0, 2.6 0, 0 1.5, 4.7 0, 0 0.7, 1.6 0.4, 1.8
Fusarium sp. 2 8.9, 0 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 2.2, 0 2.2, 0
Cirrenalia basiminuta Raghukumar et Jainal 0, 0 6.1, 0 0, 0 0, 2.3 1.5, 0.6 1.5, 0.6
Cladosporium sp. 2 0, 7.9 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 2, 0 0, 2
Sporidesmium sp. 0, 0 0, 0 0, 7.8 0, 0 0, 2 0, 1.2
Cladosporium sp. 1 0, 0 0, 0 1.5, 0 0, 4.6 0, 1.5 0.4, 1.2
Cytospora sp. 4.4, 0 0, 0 0, 1.6 0, 0 1.1, 0.4 1.1, 0.4
Alternaria chartarum Preuss 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 0, 4.6 0, 1.2 0, 1.2
Camarosporium sp. 0, 0 0, 0 3, 0 0, 0 0, 0.8 0.8, 0
Curvularia lunata (Wakker) Boedijn 0, 0 3, 0 0, 0 0, 0 0.8, 0 0.8, 0
Phomopsis sp. 0, 0 3, 0 0, 0 0, 0 0.8, 0 0.8, 0
Coelomycete sp. 2 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 1.9, 0 0, 0.5 0.5, 0
Dicyma pulvinata (Berk. et Curt.) v. Arx 0, 0 0, 0 0, 1.6 0, 0 0, 0.4 0, 0.4
Phoma sp. 2 0, 0 0, 0 1.5, 0 0, 0 0, 0.4 0.4, 0
Trichocladium sp. 2 0, 0 0, 0 0, 1.6 0, 0 0, 0.4 0, 0.4
Coelomycete sp. 1 0, 0 0, 0 1.5, 0 0, 0 0, 0.4 0.4, 0
Total ascomycetes 9, 5 12, 7 19, 13 23, 13 17, 31 32, 22
Total mitosporic fungi 19, 18 13, 17 21, 22 16, 15 28, 34 36, 33
Total taxa 28, 23 25, 25 40, 35 39, 28 45, 65 68, 55
S, Summer; M, Monsoon; L, Leaf litter; W, Woody litter; arranged in decreasing frequency of occurrence (%) in each group.
Figure 1. Per cent fungal taxa and cumulative fungal taxa sporulated on mangrove litter collected from
Nethravathi and Udyavara mangroves during summer and monsoon seasons on incubation in the labora-
tory for different durations.
Leaf litter
Nethravathi Summer 50 125 2.5 0.939 4.349 0.971 0.905 23
Nethravathi Monsoon 50 116 2.6 0.932 4.082 0.975 0.929 19
Udyavara Summer 50 71 2.1 0.925 4.134 0.959 0.890 23
Udyavara Monsoon 50 94 2.2 0.946 4.333 0.981 0.933 23
Woody litter
*SA, Number of samples assessed; FI, Number of fungal isolations; FPS, Number of fungi per sample.
**E(t150), Expected number of taxa out of 150 isolations.
Figure 4. Per cent terrestrial, marine and arenicolous fungal taxa sporulated on mangrove litter col-
lected from Nethravathi and Udyavara mangroves on incubation in the laboratory for different durations.
upstream and result in colonization of substrata by terres- lignicola) on wood. It is likely that such coexistence prevails
trial fungi. Preference of some fungi to the kind of sub- due to positive rather than negative interaction on the
strata and season was seen in our study. Mitosporic fungi woody litter. It may be possible that such aggressive behaviour
were dominant on leaf and woody litter than ascomycetes; of fungi is dependent on the kind of substrata. Halogra-
so also during summer and monsoon seasons. Terrestrial phis runica was recovered on the woody litter of Nethrava-
fungi, Arthrinium sp., Aspergillus sp. 1 and Penicillium thi mangrove (1.6%) after long incubation (32 weeks). It has
sp. were competitive against marine fungi on leaves and been reported as an endolithic lichenoid from the Belize
they were dominant during monsoon than summer. Areni- and the Great Barrier Reef38,39. It was associated with
colous fungi usually reached a peak after 32 weeks of in- coral rock, shells of snails and worm tubes. Its phyloge-
cubation. Similarly, marine fungi, including arenicolous nesis links to the terrestrial rather than marine ascomyce-
fungi were seen on the intertidal wood collected from the tes.
North Island (St. Mary’s Isles) in the southwest coast of Mangrove fungi are known for their niche and substrate
India32. A few taxa of arenicolous fungi were recorded on specificity40. Based on the kind of mangrove substrata
the mangrove substrata11,33, possibly due to short-term in- (leaf, wood and bark), fungal preferences and succession
cubation in the laboratory. may vary. Assessment of fungal colonization on mangrove
Mangrove woody litter has been considered the second litter will be more effective and informative, if different
important host for marine fungi after driftwood34. Greater methods are employed. Fungal colonization of mangrove
fungal diversity and species richness were seen on woody and intertidal woody litter was assessed by plating22,41 and
litter than on leaf litter (65 vs 49 taxa), so also the fungal damp incubation42–44 techniques. Plating technique usually
taxa per sample (1–8 vs 1–5) in the present study. Such results in the isolation of terrestrial fungi, while using the
diversity and richness of fungi might be due to the persis- damp incubation technique, besides terrestrial fungi, marine
tence of woody litter than leaf litter in mangrove habitats. fungi can also be recovered. Similarly, submerged aeration
However, mean fungal taxa per woody litter was 3 (range: technique facilitates isolation of freshwater hyphomycetes
2.5–3.6). This is higher than the mangrove woody litter from mangrove or estuarine substrata45,46. Future studies may
studied at Seychelles, Brunei, Malaysia, Sumatra, Thailand, address substrate specificity, seasonal impacts, interference
Singapore, Hong Kong and Macau (1–2.7 per wood)35. competition and biotechnological potential of fungi in the
Tan et al.36 showed that V. enalia exhibited the highest mangrove ecosystem.
antagonism against associated fungi followed by Aigialus
parvus and Lignincola laevis. V. enalia became the most
‘aggressive’ taxon than A. parvus and L. laevis on coculturing 1. Lugo, A. E. and Snedaker, S. C., Properties of a mangrove forest
on mangrove wood36. Corollospora maritima and Lulwor- in southern Florida. In Proceedings of the International Sympo-
sium on Biology and Management of Mangroves (eds Walsh, G. E.,
thia sp. were also considered as ‘aggressive’ taxa by Miller
Snedaker, S. C. and Teas, H. J.), University of Florida, Gaines-
et al.37. But V. enalia in the present study coexisted with ville, 1975, pp. 170–212.
many core-group fungi (A. chesapeakensis, A. parvulus, 2. Qusim, S. Z. and Wafer, M. V. M., Marine resources in the trop-
C. pygmea, K. tethys, L. grandispora, P. prolifica and S. ics. Resour. Manage. Optim., 1990, 7, 141–169.