Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul
a
Centro de Investigaciones Biol
ogicas del Noroeste, S.C., Mar Bermejo #195, Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz,
Baja California Sur CP 23090, Mexico
b
Amigos para la Conservaci
on de Cabo Pulmo, Calle 20 de Nov S/N, Box 66, Los Barriles, Baja California Sur CP 23501, Mexico
c
US Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Ecological Exposure Research Division,
Environmental Contaminant Characterization Branch, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA
Abstract
We measured organochlorine residues in three species of sea turtles from the Baja California peninsula, Mexico. Seventeen of 21
organochlorine pesticides analyzed were detected, with heptachlor epoxide and c-hexachlorocyclohexane the most prevalent (14
(40%) and 11 (31%) of the 35 tissue samples, respectively). PCBs were detected in all but one of the 9 turtles studied, with congener
18 the most commonly detected (8 (23%) of the samples). The dioxin-like congeners 118 and 180 were detected in 4 (11%) and 3 (9%)
of the samples, respectively. Percent contribution of congeners was negatively correlated to their octanol–water partition coeffi-
cients, with kidney and muscle containing more lower-chlorinated congeners than liver or adipose samples. Levels of organochlo-
rines detected in the present study were low, potentially attributable to the feeding habits of the predominant species collected in this
study (herbivorous) and/or the samples obtained in an unindustrialized region.
Ó 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Sea turtle; Chelonia mydas; Halogenated hydrocarbons; Pesticides; Developing countries; Mexico
Fig. 1. Locations where sea turtles were collected along the Baja California peninsula, Mexico.
1084 S.C. Gardner et al. / Marine Pollution Bulletin 46 (2003) 1082–1089
analyses, the relative percent deviation was also 50% for ficients (Kow ) as reported by Hawker and Connell
80% of the analytes. (1988).
The influence of concentration differences among
2.3. Computational methods and statistical analyses samples was removed for principal components analysis
(PCA)
P by converting them to percent contribution to
Data are expressed as nanograms per gram lipid OC. In a separate PCA employing only congener
(ng g1 lipid) basis, but for comparison purposes non- data, sample congener signatures were compared to the
lipid-corrected data expressed on a wet weight basis signatures of five commercial Aroclor mixtures (1016,
(ng g1 ww) are also included in the discussion and data 1242, 1248, 1254 and 1260) reported by the USEPA
tables. Contaminants that were not detected in any of (2002).
the samples were removed from statistical treatments.
Contaminants reported as less than the detection limit (3
ng g1 ww) in individual samples were replaced with a 3. Results
random number between the detection limit and one-
half the detection limit (Helsel, 1990;
PTravis and Land, One or more OCs were detected P in each of the nine
1990). Total PCB concentrations ( PCBs) were cal- turtles collected for this study. PCBs were detected in
culated based on the sum of the detectedP congeners, and all but one of the turtles (89% of individuals) and in 18
total organochlorine concentrations ( OCs) were cal- of 35 (51%) individual tissue samples. Seventeen of the
culated based on the sum of these same congeners and 21 organochlorine pesticides for which analyses were
the detected organochlorine pesticides. conducted were detected in at least one sample (2,40 -
Data were natural log (ln) transformed prior to DDE, Endosulfan I, Dieldrin, and Mirex were not de-
conducting parametric statistics. Statistical analyses tected
P in any of the samples) (Table 1).
employed the Systat Statistical Software Package (Ver- OCs in sea turtle
P tissues ranged1from 29 P to 5100
sion 8.0, SPSS Inc., 1998). Reported statistics are geo- ng g1 lipid (mean OCs ¼ 300 ng g lipid). PCBs
metric means and 95% confidence intervals. The null ranged over three
P orders of magnitude, 0.040–40 ng g1
1
hypothesis was rejected if p 6 0:05. Pairwise compari- lipid (mean PCBs ¼ 1:5 ng g lipid). Heptachlor
sons following analysis of variance (ANOVA) employed epoxide, a toxic metabolite of the pesticide Chlordane,
the Tukey test (SPSS Inc., 1998). Percent contributions was the most prevalent of 41 organochlorine com-
of each PCB congener to the signatures of individual pounds examined in this study and was detected in 14
samples were averaged for the dataset and plotted (40%) of the 35 tissue samples. Among tissue types it
against congener-specific octanol–water partition coef- was most commonly detected in adipose, 7 out of the 9
Table 1
Organochlorine residues detected in tissue samples from three sea turtle species collected along the Baja California peninsula, Mexico
Species Tissue (n) Contaminant class
P P P
PCBa DDTb Chlorc HCB Aldrin/diel- Endosulfan Endrin Lindane
drind I & IIe
C. mydas Muscle (7) ND-17.4 ND-14.0 ND-13.5 ND ND-4.8 ND-7.6 ND-4.0 ND-9.7
agassizii Liver (7) ND-44.7 ND-7.8 ND-10.4 ND-18.6 ND ND ND ND-11.5
Adipose (7) ND-49.5 ND-12.2 ND-65.1 ND ND ND-7.8 ND-3.5 ND-11.9
Kidney (7) ND-15.9 ND-10.2 ND-22.9 ND ND-4.8 ND-7.7 ND-3.9 ND-9.7
60
Adipose
Kidney
30
20
10
0
8 18 28 52 44 66 118 153 187 128 180 209
IUPAC Congener No.
Fig. 2. PCB congener compositions (percent contribution to totals) of representative sea turtle adipose, liver, kidney and muscle samples.
2
Tissue
Adipose
CmK26 CmA26
LoK25 CmK29 Kidney
1 CmA29 CmM21 CmL4
CmL26 Liver
LoA25 CmK21
LoL25 LoM25 A1242 Muscle
Aroclor
0 CmA21 A1248
PC2
CmL27 A1016
CmA34
CcM12
-1 A1254
CcM12 CcL12
A1260
-2
CmA27
-3
(a) -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
PC1
1.0
C8
C18
C28
0.5 C209 C66
C118
PC2
Fig. 5. Comparison of total PCB concentrations among sea turtle C180 C128
tissues ðn ¼ 18Þ. Values are geometric means and 95% confidence in- C153
0.0 C187
tervals. Differences were determined by Tukey pairwise comparisons C44
ðp < 0:05Þ. C52
-0.5
Contaminant loads of the samples were further com- -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
(b) PC1
pared using principal components analysis. PCA that
included data for all OCs generated three principal 1.0
PC1 score = -0.46 log K + 2.9
components that explained only 36.4% of the total (n=12, r = 0.57, p = 0.004)
variance in the data (18%, 9.4% and 9.0%, respectively). C52
C44
0.5
PCA that included only PCB congener data generated C18
C28
C66
PC1Score
total variance in the data (31%, 17% and 15%, respec- 0.0
tively). Plotted relative to the first two principal com- C118 C209
ponents, the commercial Aroclor mixtures separated in a -0.5
manner that suggested both PC1 and PC2 reflect the C128 C187
Gordon, A.N., Pople, A.R., Ng, J., 1998. Trace metal concentrations Mckenzie, C., Godley, B.J., Furness, R.W., Wells, D.E., 1999.
in livers and kidneys of sea turtles from south-eastern Queensland, Concentrations and patterns of organochlorine contaminants in
Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 49, 409–414. marine turtles from Mediterranean and Atlantic waters. Marine
Hutchinson, J., Simmonds, M., 1992. Escalation of threats to marine Environmental Research 47, 117–135.
turtles. Oryx 26, 95–102. McKim Jr., J.M., Johnson, K.L., 1983. Polychlorinated biphenyls and
Hawker, D.W., Connell, D.W., 1988. Octanol–water partition coeffi- p,p0 -DDE in loggerhead and green postyearling Atlantic sea turtles.
cients of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners. Environmental Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 31, 53–
Science and Technology 22, 382–387. 60.
Helsel, D.R., 1990. Less than obvious. Environmental Science and Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-133-ECOL-2000, 2001. Protecci on
Technology 24, 1766–1774. ambiental bifenilos policlorados (BPCÕs)––especificaciones de man-
Herbst, L.H., 1994. Fibropapilloma of marine turtles. Annual Reviews ejo. Diario Oficial de la Federacion DOF December 10.
of Fish Disease 4, 389–425. Norstrom, R.J., Muir, D.C.G., 1994. Chlorinated hydrocarbon
Herbst, L.H., Klein, P.A., 1995. Green turtle fibropapillomatosis: contaminants in arctic marine mammals. The Science of the Total
Challenges to assessing the role of environmental cofactors. In: Environment 154, 107–128.
Rolland, R., Gilbertson, M. (Eds.), Colborn Wildlife Development Pugh, R.S., Becker, P.R., 2001. Sea turtle contaminants: a review with
NIH-95-218. Environmental Health Perspectives 103 (Supp.), 27– annotated bibliography. US Department of Commerce Report.
30. NISTIR 6700. 144 pp.
Instituto Nacional de Ecologıa. INE, 2001. Sistema nacional de Rybitski, M.J., Hale, R.C., Musick, J.A., 1995. Distribution of
informaci on ambiental de las sustancias t oxicas de atenci on organochlorine pollutants in Atlantic sea turtles. Copeia 2, 379–
prioritaria en Mexico. Situaci on general con relaci on a las 390.
sustancias quımicas. Available from <http://sepultura.semar- Safe, S., 1994. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): environmental
nat.gob.mx/upsec/programas/prog_gastap/39.html>. impact, biochemical and toxic responses, and implications for risk
IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group, 1995. A global strategy assessment. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 24, 87–149.
for the conservation of marine turtles. UICN, Cambridge CB# SPSS, Inc., 1998. SYSTATÒ 8.0, Statistics. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
ODL, UK. Travis, C.D., Land, M.L., 1990. Estimating the mean of datasets with
Ju
arez, C.J.A., Barrag an, R.A.R., G omez, R.H., 2000. Contamination nondetectable values. Environmental Science and Technology 24,
by phtlate ester plasticizers in two marine turtle species. In: Abreu- 961–962.
Grobois, F.A., Brise~ no-Due~ nas, R., Marquez, R., Sarti, L. (Eds.), United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2002. PCB
Proceedings of the eighteenth International Sea Turtle Symposium. ID––congener-specific PCB (Aroclor) composition data. United
US dep. Commer. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-SEFSC-436, p. States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Polychlori-
118. nated Biphenyl Identification. Available from <http://www.epa.-
Lake, J.L., Haebler, R., Mckinney, R., Lake, C.A., Sadove, S.S., 1994. gov/toxteam/pcbid/aroclor_comp.htm>.
PCBs and other chlorinated organic contaminants in tissues of Vazquez, G.F., Reyes, M.C., Fernandez, G., Aguayo, J.E.C., Sharma,
juvenile kempÕs ridley turtles (Lepidochelys kempi). Marine Envi- V.K., 1997. Contamination in marine turtle (Dermochelys coriaca)
ronmental Research 38, 313–327. egg shells of Playon de Mexiquillo, Michoacan, Mexico. Bulletin of
Lazorchak, J.M., Klemm, D.L., 1994. US Environmental Protection Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 58, 326–333.
Agency. Laboratory methods manual for streams. EPA/620/R-94/ Waldichuk, M., 1987. Sea turtles––endangered species. Marine Pollu-
003. Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH. tion Bulletin 18, 623–627.
Lopez Mendilaharsu, M., 2002. Ecologıa alimenticia de Chelonia Yeardley Jr., R.B., Lazorchak, J.M., Paulsen, S.G., 1998. Elemental
mydas agassizii en Bahıa Magdalena, Baja California Sur, Mexico. fish tissue contamination in northeastern US Lakes: evaluation of
MasterÕs of Science Thesis. Centro de Investigaciones Biol ogicas an approach to regional assessment. Environmental Toxicology
del Noroeste, S.C. La Paz, Mexico. 89 pp. and Chemistry 17, 1875–1884.