Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Email: - annaiahmh@yahoo.co.in
Dr.Soma v chetty
Email: - soma_chetty@rediffmail.com
Email: - bsudheerpk@yahoo.co.in
ABSTRACT
The wear behaviour of as cast and heat treated A 356.0 alloys containing 7.25% silicon slid against
hardened steel counter face were studied using Pin-on-Disc apparatus by varying loads , sliding distances and
sliding velocity. Cast alloys were subjected T6 heat treatment involving solutionisin at 5400deg celg, water
quenching and artificially aged for 6 hrs at three different ageing temperatures namely 170, 180 and 190 deg cel.
The microstructure of both as cast and heat treated alloys were observed using Light Optical Microscope and
photographed. The worn surfaces of Pins were photographed using Light Optical and Scanning Electron
Microscopes to analyze for wear mechanism. Spherodization of needle shaped silicon particles, reduction in size
and their uniform distribution due to heat treatment resulted in improved wear resistance of heat treated alloys
compared to as cast alloys. The wear resistance increased with ageing temperature.
Ni 0.025
Zinc 0.005
Others 0.028
Al Balance
Table II
Alloy Hardness(RHN)
designation
540-6h-170 92
540-6h-180 93
540-6h-190 95
4
Fig 5; Wear Testing Machine
5
Fig 8; SEM of the worn end of as cast alloy under Fig 15; SEM of the worn of as cast alloy under a
a Normal load of 30 N slid for 300meters
normal load of 30 N slid for 1500 meter
meters.
meters.
6. References
Fig 14; Magnified SEM of the Worn end of as cast
alloy under a normal load of 30 N slid for 1500 1.A.D Sarkar.;Wear 31(1975) 331-343
meter showing the intersecting cracks. 2.R.Shivanath et al; Br Foundry man 70 (1977)
349-356
3.K.Razavizadeh and T.S.Eyre; Wear 79(1982)
325-333
4.K.Razavizadeh and T.S.Eyre; Wear 87(1983)
261-271
5.A.B.Gurcan,T.N.Baker ; Wear 188(1995) 185-
191
6
6.Ashok Sharma and T.V.Rajan; Wear74(1994) 11.Hozimo Gotu,Kenji Uchijo; Wear 259(2005)
217-228 613-619
7.Mohd. Harun, I.A.Talib,A.R.Daud ;Wear 12.Dheerendra Kumar Dwivedi; ISIJ
194(1996) 54-59 International, vol46 (2006) No.7pp1101-1105
8.H.Akbulut,M.Durman,F.Yilmaz ;Wear 13.M.Elmadagli,T.Perry,A.T.Alpas; Wear 262
215(1998 )170-179 (2007) 79-82
9.J.An, Y.B.Liu, Y.Lu, Q.Y.Zhang,C.Dong ;Wear 14.S.K.Dey,T.A.Perry,A.T.Alpas;Wear
256(2004) 374-385 267(2009) 515-524
10.M.Cai, D.P.Field,G.W.Lorimer; Matl Science
& Engg.A 373(2004 ) 65-71
5 5 4 0 -4 h
4
5 4 0 -5 h
3
2 5 4 0 -6 h Light optical Micrographs
1
0
1 1.2 5 1 .5 1 .75 2 2.25
Fig. 3.4. (a,b,c) shows the light optical
S l i d in g V e l o c ity , m /s
micrographs of the worn surfaces of as cast,
peak solution treated and age hardened alloys
Fig. 3.2. As cast versus age hardened alloys tested at a sliding velocity of 1 m/s and the
Fig. 3.2. shows the plot of wear rate verses optical micrographs obtained appear almost
sliding velocity for as cast and age hardened identical with slightly wider and deeper grooves
alloys.A decreased trend in wear rate was observed for as cast material compared to
observed with increase in sliding velocity till a solution treated and age hardened alloys.
7
Fig.3.4c. LOM of worn surface of 540-6h -170
alloy slid at 1m/s
Fig.3.4h. LOM of worn surface of 540-6h-170
alloy slid at 2.25m/s
In Fig 3.4(d,e,f) are shown the optical
micrographs of worn surfaces at which transition This increased wear rate in as cast material
is observed with comparatively less wider and compared to the other heat treated alloys was
deeper grooves compared to Fig 3.4(a,b,c). The attributed to the low hardeness of as cast
decreased trend may be attributed to a portion of material compared to heat treated alloys. The
debris produced filling the grooves on the wear other factor resulting in higher wear rate at low
surface and forming a compact protective layer sliding velocity is the metal to metal contact at
of debris at the Pin-Disc interface. the Pin-Disc interface where the rate at which
the material was removed was higher compared
to the rate at which tribolayers are formed at the
Fig 3.4(g,h,i) shows the optical micrographs of Pin-Disc interface.
the worn surface of as cast and heat treated
alloys photographed after transition velocity 4. Scanning Electron Micrographs Analysis
resulting in wider and deeper grooves. The
increased wear rate after transition (at high Figs.4(a,b,c). show the Scanning Electron
velocity) may be attributed to steep increase of Micrographs of as cast ,peak solution treated and
temperature at the Pin-Disc interface and sub peak age hardened Al-Si-Mg alloys slid at a
surface leading to the softening of Pin material, velocity of 1m/s under a normal load of 20 N for
irrespective of condition of material (as cast or 10 minutes.These micrographs are almost
heat treated). similar with the worn surfaces characterised by
long continuous grooves and severely damaged
regions indicating higher wear rate
.
8
Fig.4f. SEM of 540-6h alloy slid at 2m/s
Plate 4.39:Light optical micrograph of 540-6h-
170 alloy slid at 1m/s
The Scanning Electron Micrographs are again
Plates 4.36, 4.38, and 4.40 shows the almost identical but with lot of striations and
scanning electron micrographs of as lesser width grooves compared to alloys slid at 1
cast ,peak solution treated and peak m/s. The decreased width of the grooves and
age hardened Al-Si-Mg alloys slid at a lesser damage caused to the surface results in
velocity of 1m/s under a normal load minimum wear. This decreased wear rate with
of 20 N for 10 minutes.These increased sliding velocity is attributed to the
micrographs are almost similar with increased hardness achieved by heat treatment.
the worn surfaces characterised by
long continuous grooves and severely Figs.4(g,h,i). show the Scanning Electron
damaged regions indicating of higher Micrographs of as cast (slid at 2.25 m/s), peak
wear rate. solution treated and peak age hardened (slid at
2.25 m/s) under a normal load of 20 N for 10
minutes.
9
The worn sufaces are charaterized by severe
damage resulting in higher wear rate compared
to wear transition velocity (figs. d,e,f). the wear
rate was maximum for as cast material and least
for 540-6h alloy.
5. DEBRIS ANALYSIS
5e
5a
5f
The debris produced at higher velocity 2.25 m/s
5b (Fig.5g) was a mixture of bigger sized irregular
flakes indicating the occurrence of delamination
of Pin specimen.
10
5g 5i
Wear rate
Wear Rate of Wear Rate of 540-6h- Wear rate of 540-6h- of 540-6h-
Load,N As cast 170 180 190
10 6.50E-06 4.00E-06 3.47E-06 2.93E-06
20 1.02E-05 6.50E-06 6.53E-06 5.00E-06
30 1.42E-05 8.83E-06 7.53E-06 6.87E-06
40 1.47E-05 1.08E-05 8.47E-06 6.99E-06
50 1.51E-05 1.35E-05 1.09E-05 8.02E-06
60 2.19E-05 1.56E-05 1.31E-05 9.20E-06
Sliding Wear Rate Wear Rate of 540-6h- Wear Rate of 540- Wear Rate of
Distance,m of As cast 170 6h-180 540-6h-190
300 1.28E-05 8.60E-06 3.33E-06 1.70E-06
600 1.43E-05 9.80E-06 7.17E-06 6.03E-06
900 1.52E-05 1.09E-05 8.45E-06 6.57E-06
1200 1.62E-05 1.12E-05 7.67E-06 6.89E-06
1500 1.86E-05 1.45E-05 1.01E-05 9.27E-06
11