You are on page 1of 96

Governor’s State-of-State Speech

Gov. Perry: We Must Reform, Streamline State


Government
Outlines priorities for legislative session, biennium in State of the State address
Tuesday, February 08, 2011 • Austin, Texas • Speech

Thank you, Speaker Straus and thank you, Governor Dewhurst for your leadership and
service to our state. The three of us are bound together by shared duties, shared
responsibilities, and, most importantly, shared outcomes. When the final gavel sounds on
this legislative session, we won't get points for our speeches or extra credit for our
process. Instead, we'll be judged on our results, by the outcomes we achieve for the
people of Texas.

I'm confident our efforts will be found wise, prudent and effective.

So let me begin by greeting my fellow statewide officials, members of the judiciary and
the Legislature, distinguished guests, friends and fellow Texans. I am honored to uphold
our constitutional tradition, and speak to you today on the state of our state.

As you know, I owe everything I am to Texas, for raising me, blessing me with
opportunity, and teaching me the value of good, old fashioned hard work.

The shaping process that began under the watchful eye of my loving parents, Ray and
Amelia Perry, continues to this day through the greatest gift of my life, Anita Thigpen
Perry. She represents all that is good about Texas women, with her grace, strength and
compassion and wonderful smile.

She also shares in my greatest joy: our children, Sydney, Griffin and his wife, Meredith.

I also credit the Boy Scouts for molding my character and shaping my values. I want to
recognize the Scouts from the Capitol Area Council who are with us today, and
congratulate the Boy Scouts of America at the conclusion of their Centennial Celebration.

Throughout my life and service to this state, my optimism about Texas and its people has
never wavered, and, by any meaningful measure, the state of our state is strong.
As I look out over this chamber and see the familiar faces of so many friends and
colleagues, I'm reminded of those who are no longer with us, especially my old
roommate and mentor, Edmund Kuempel. His passing was a reminder to all of us that life
is fleeting, that friendship matters and that we only have a short time to make a
difference.

As legislators, you get 140 days to make that difference, and the clock is ticking.

Page 1 of 12

4
As this session gets rolling, some folks are painting a pretty grim picture of our situation,
so we need to balance their pessimism with the good news that continues to flow from
our comparatively strong economy.

Have the doomsayers forgotten that Texas added more jobs in 2010 than any other state?
Last year, the growth rate of Texas jobs was nearly double that of any other top ten state.

Some partisan commentators have tried to downplay our economic success by giving sole
credit to our energy industry. Now, let me tell you, I'm mighty proud of what our energy
industry has done and still does for our state, but our economic strength is built on a
much broader base.

Our job growth occurred across a wide variety of sectors, including business services,
healthcare, construction, manufacturing, hospitality, and, of course, our substantial
energy industry.

According to the Brookings Institute, Texas had six of the nation's 20 Strongest-
Performing Metros.

Those figures paint a much more encouraging picture, don't you think?

Our economic strength is no accident. It's a testimony to our people, our entrepreneurs
and, yes, to the decisions made in this building. Employers from across the country and
around the world understand that the opportunity they crave can be found in Texas, and
they're headed our way, with jobs in tow.

People are seeking opportunity as well, and newcomers arrive every day, ready to pursue
their dreams. For the sixth year running, research from Allied Van Lines showed that
Texas was the top destination for relocations.
Need I go on? Well, don't mind if I do.

Newsweek magazine had four Texas cities on their list of "Top 10 American Cities Best
Situated for Recovery", and Forbes considers our growth prospects best in the nation,
based on projected increases in jobs, income, and gross state product.

In a category that really affects the bottom line for Texas families, our state leads the
nation in strong home values. According to one industry analyst, the strongest
appreciation in home values over the next seven months, will take place in the Houston
area, the Metroplex and Amarillo.

According to our meticulous, hardworking Comptroller, Susan Combs, Texas has ten
consecutive months of sales tax growth.

I could keep listing accolades, but I don't want to give the other states a complex, and
we've got a lot of ground to cover this morning. So let me boil it down to these simple

Page 2 of 12

5
truths:, the core elements of our economy are strong, and Texas is still the envy of our
nation.

We have a strong advantage over those states that care more about the expansion and
extension of government than the freedom and prosperity of their citizens. As Exhibit A,
I submit the Illinois legislature's recent decision to raise taxes as much as 66 percent.
That may have seemed like an easy fix from Springfield, Illinois, but it takes on a
completely different meaning, for families on a budget or employers on tight margins.

Some experts have predicted that other states will follow their lead, including our key
competitors like California and New York. When those states dig deeper into their
citizens' wallets, Texas looks even better by comparison.
I can assure you that we will compete and win jobs from those states, or should I say
more jobs, since we've already won thousands.

It might be time to send a few more letters to their employers, inviting them to move to
Texas. I'd include stories about business leaders like some that are here in this historic
chamber today.

About ten years ago, a small group of entrepreneurs in Los Angeles created a company
called LegalZoom, that grew rapidly. When it came time to expand, they looked to Texas,
where they found the right mix of factors including our workforce, our quality of life, and
investments from the Texas Enterprise Fund and the city of Austin.

We are proud to welcome them and their 600 jobs to Texas, and thank them for their
contribution to our economy. Those jobs are among the tens of thousands of jobs that the
Enterprise Fund has brought to Texas, along with nearly $15 billion in capital investment.

As the nation struggles to recover from the ongoing economic crisis, and states go head-
to-head for new jobs, now is not the time for Texas to roll up our tents and go home.
Instead, it's time to keep attracting good Texas jobs by funding our premiere economic
development tools like the Enterprise Fund, and the Emerging Technology Fund.

If we pulled the plug on our economic development efforts, no one would be happier than
my fellow governors, in states like Oklahoma and New Jersey, who are creating their
own versions of the TEF, to compete for the jobs we've been landing.

We owe it to our citizens to maintain our competitive edge, especially because our
economy's relative prosperity does not extend into every single Texas home.

I am deeply concerned about those Texas families that are dealing with joblessness and
the fear and uncertainty that it cultivates. These are friends who live in our
neighborhoods, worship in our churches, then wonder how long they'll have a roof over
their heads.

Page 3 of 12

6
An unemployment level that has hovered about a full point below the national average is
a good indicator of our comparative strength, but it also tells a tough story for more
Texans than any of us can or should accept. When it comes to our vision for this state,
our work will not be done until every Texan who wants a job has a job.

Research and experience tell us that the only way to create those jobs is to knock down
the senseless obstacles to economic growth. For more than a decade, those of us elected
to serve in this building have been working diligently to remove those obstacles, and
create a level playing field, following a few simple rules.

For example, setting aside resources for a rainy day has given us a resource that other
states would love to have, and some in our state would love for us to spend dry.
Emptying the savings account to pay for recurring expenses is a bad idea, whether it
happens at home, the workplace or in our state budget.

That approach would not only postpone tough, necessary decisions, but also leave us ill-
equipped to handle bigger emergencies in the future. Therefore, we must protect the
Rainy Day Fund.

Second, we've created a predictable regulatory environment, so that employers know


what to expect from one quarter to the next. I'm talking about programs like our flexible
permitting program that has contributed to cleaner air and economic development in
Texas.

Between 2000 and 2009, this program helped Texas achieve a 27% reduction of
statewide ozone levels, more than any other state. NOx has fallen by 53-percent and
almost every metropolitan area is meeting the current air standard. For those of you
keeping track, Dallas is within just one part per billion of meeting the standard as well. In
true Texas style, we made those air quality improvements, while Texas employers were
creating more private sector jobs, than any other big state in the nation.

Third, we've reformed our legal system to cut down on frivolous lawsuits, so employers
and doctors don't spend all their time in court. Since tort reform took effect, more than
26,000 medical license applications have been received, and 33 counties got their first
emergency room physician. Since the passage of reforms, Senator Lucio, the Rio Grande
Valley has added 220 physicians to care for its growing population.

Joining us today is Dr. Javier Cardenas, an OB/GYN who returned to his hometown of
McAllen to practice medicine, thanks to tort reform. He represents all those doctors who
are able to practice medicine in our state without the ever-present threat of a frivolous
lawsuit. Those doctors represent better access to care, a higher quality of life, and, more
importantly, lives saved.

Fourth, thanks to leaders like Representative Rob Eissler and Senator Florence Shapiro,
we've increased accountability in our public schools. We've engaged legislators, local

Page 4 of 12

7
districts, teachers and parents in the process and genuinely reformed education in our
state.

Over the past decade, the state's share of public education spending increased from $11
billion per year, to $20 billion in '09. That's an 82% increase. Part of our push for
accountability has included a sharper focus on the basics like math, science, English &
social studies.

Those efforts are paying off in the lives of our young people. For example, Texas has
been recognized as one of only four states closing the achievement gap in math. On the
latest National Assessment of Educational Progress, Texas children scored significantly
higher than their peers.

The quality of education in our state is getting better and better preparing hardworking
Texans to apply their legendary work ethic and provide for their families.

Those families sent a pretty clear message with their November votes. They want
government to be even leaner and more efficient, and they want us to balance the budget
without raising taxes on families and employers.

Fortunately, the leaders in this room, led by Chairman Ogden and Chairman Pitts, have
balanced the budget before and they'll do it again. We just can't forget that dollars do far
more to create jobs and prosperity in the people's hands, than they can in the
government's.

Taking more money away from Texas families and employers is not the answer to our
challenges because they've already sacrificed plenty. Balancing our budget without
raising taxes will certainly set a nice example for the rest of the nation, but we have a
bigger motivation.

Balancing our budget without raising taxes will keep us moving forward out of these
tough economic times, creating more jobs and opportunity and leaving Texas more
competitive than ever.

Now, the mainstream media and big government interest groups are doing their best to
convince us that we're facing a budget Armageddon. Texans don't believe it and they
shouldn't because it's not true.

Are we facing some tough choices? Of course, but we can overcome them by setting
priorities, cutting bureaucracy, reducing spending and focusing on what really matters to
Texas families.

Fortunately, we saw this challenge coming. That's why we didn't touch the Rainy Day
Fund during the last legislative session. That's why Lt Governor Dewhurst, Speaker
Straus and I called on state agencies to get involved in the process.

Page 5 of 12

8
Starting in January 2010, we asked them to identify 5 percent savings in the 2010-2011
biennium and 10 percent for the ‘12-‘13 biennium. Those agency leaders responded with
a concerted effort, taking stock of their organizations and coming up with proactive cuts,
that will keep Texas moving in the right direction. To keep that momentum going, the
three of us recently asked agencies to identify an additional 2.5 percent savings for the
2011 fiscal year.

My office is an agency as well, and we cut $34.6 million in this cycle, which equates to
almost 11 percent of our budget. As all Texans tighten their belts, we need to do more
than just shave off a dollar here and there.

If ever there was a time to truly reform our approach to governance and streamline our
organization, it is now. Frank discussions about the true purpose of state government,
must be followed by a willingness to act on our convictions.

There should be no sacred cows in this business and that reality is reflected in the budget
that I submitted this morning. To eliminate duplication, let's consolidate functions, like
moving the Department of Rural Affairs into the Department of Agriculture.

Let's suspend non-mission-critical entities like the Historical Commission or the


Commission on the Arts until the economy improves. Let's take an even closer look at the
way we deliver essential services, to make sure we're taking the most efficient, cost-
effective approach.

We should follow the lead of HHSC, whose inspector general has saved the state more
than $5.3 billion dollars since its creation in 2004. Applied across all state agencies and
departments, these practices could significantly reduce wasteful spending, and save
taxpayers' money. A state Inspector General would work directly with the agencies,
enhancing the state auditor's efforts and improving efficiencies.

While we're at it, let's be sure we're not burdening local authorities with unfunded
mandates, because they're facing their own budget challenges.

In the end, our decisions should always reflect a fundamental truth: we work for the
people, not the other way around.

With a balanced budget as our foundation, I encourage you to move quickly on the
emergency items I've submitted. Most Texans, regardless of party, believe the integrity of
elections would be improved, by requiring participants to show a valid photo
identification before voting. I wholeheartedly agree and thank Senator Fraser for carrying
that bill.

We also need to protect property ownership with tougher eminent domain laws using the
approach taken by Senator Estes & Representative Geren in their bill.
We need to protect the unborn by fast-tracking the sonogram bill, so that women are

Page 6 of 12

9
fully, medically informed before they make the life-changing decision to terminate a
pregnancy.

We also need to hold Washington more accountable, with a bill calling for a balanced
budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

As those bills come to my desk for signature, I hope they'll be closely followed by others
aimed at improving our public education system, especially efforts to reduce our dropout
rate.

So let's expand our Virtual School Network, with a Virtual High School that will not only
enable students who have dropped out to earn a diploma online, but also give students
across the state access to classes their own schools may not offer.

To encourage students to stay in high school, let's require them to either be enrolled or
working towards a GED, if they want to get and/or keep their Texas driver's license.

Let's also create an incentive program for employers who encourage their employees to
continue their high school education.

Let's offer employers a $1,500 tax incentive for every employee who earns their diploma
or GED after receiving two hours off per week with pay to study or go to class.
Let's expand our STEM academies, those innovative schools that teach young Texans the
science, technology, engineering and math skills they need, to compete for high tech jobs
and college scholarships.

We also need to help school districts reduce their expenses in these tight budgetary times,
made worse by a certain Texas Congressman who singled out our state for punishment in
pursuit of his own agenda.

One approach is to encourage districts to enter into shared service arrangements with
other entities in their area.

On the higher education front, we've experienced enrollment growth over the last two
years higher than any time in Texas history. Our public institutions had 200,000 more
students enrolled in 2010 than they did in 2008, so let's be sure those students and their
families are getting the best value for their time and money.

Change does not come easily or naturally to these big institutions, but it is critical to
educational effectiveness and efficiency. Back in September of '09,
I ordered a review of cost efficiencies at our universities as a way to make education
more affordable.
One idea that emerged from that process is called "Outcomes-Based Funding" in which a
significant percent of undergraduate funding, would be based on the number of degrees
awarded. Texans deserve college graduation for their hard-earned tax dollars, not just
college enrollment.

Page 7 of 12

10
As families continue to struggle with the cost of higher education, I am renewing my call
for a four-year tuition freeze, locking in tuition rates at or below the freshman level for
four years.

As leaders like Senator Zaffirini search for more low-cost pathways to a degree, it's time
for a bold, Texas-style solution to this challenge, that I'm sure the brightest minds in our
universities can devise. Today, I'm challenging our institutions of higher education to
develop bachelor's degrees that cost no more than $10,000, including textbooks.

Let's leverage web-based instruction, innovative teaching techniques and aggressive


efficiency measures to reach that goal. Imagine the potential impact on affordability and
graduation rates, and the number of skilled workers it would send into our economy.

Speaking of skilled workers, we have a ready source of technical skills living among us
that too often goes untapped. Countless Texas veterans receive top-level training in the
military, but have a hard time getting credit for their knowledge and skills when they
return to civilian life. We should support what one school calls "College Credit 4
Heroes."

With the support of Senator Van de Putte, the Texas Workforce Commission is working
with Higher Education Coordinating Board and our community colleges on a plan to
offer veterans credit for their skills & experience. The goal is to accelerate them into the
Allied Health Occupations, which are critically needed across our state, and offer
immense opportunity to these brave men and women.

As we increase the opportunity inherent in our economy, let's increase the accountability,
transparency and efficiency of our legal system as well. Let's take the next step in our
fight against lawsuit abuse by sparing our citizens and our job creators the financial
burden of defending themselves from frivolous lawsuits.

Texas needs a "loser pays" component in our legal system, in which those who sue and
lose are required to pay the court costs and legal expenses of those they sued.

Texas is one of a very few states who don't have an "early dismissal" option for obviously
frivolous lawsuits...but we should. We need to make our system more accessible to the
little guy, by setting up expedited trials and limited discovery, for lawsuits with claims
between $10,000 and $100,000 dollars.

These reforms would further improve the legal climate in our state, and impart even more
energy, stability and security to our economy.

The pursuit of true stability and security also requires us to maintain law and order and
keep our citizens safe. Last fall, I proposed legislation targeting sex offenders, to better
protect our citizens. We should empower prosecutors to seek life without parole for
certain repeat sex offenders, and requiring active GPS monitoring of high risk offenders
for three years after they've done their time and been released by TDCJ.

Page 8 of 12

11
On a broader scale, we should also continue our investment in border security because
the threat of cross-border violence has only grown, as the drug wars escalate. I don't raise
the issue of border security as a criticism of our neighbors to the south, but to show our
resolve and unity in the struggle, as they deal with a wave of violence unlike anything
outside of the world's war zones.

Our relationship with Mexico predates our establishment as a state, and our proud
Hispanic citizens are friends, neighbors, partners and family Our desire is to strengthen
our trade and cultural ties with Mexico through a climate of law and order, that brings
peace and security to our border region.

The vicious criminals who murdered American missionary Nancy Davis just two weeks
ago, are, no doubt, inflicting the same violence and intimidation on the people of Mexico,
and they must be brought to justice. I must admit that news of Mrs. Davis' death brought
the events of this last fall rushing back, as we grieved with Tiffany Hartley over the loss
of her husband, David, at the hands of narco-terrorists on Falcon Lake.

Tiffany is with us here today. Tiffany, know that we continue to pray for you as we
demand the perpetrators of this brutal crime be brought to justice.

Tiffany's presence reminds us that border security is not just a hot button issue for the
talk shows, but a matter of life and death for American citizens, in the border region and
in communities across our state.

We must keep taking the fight to vicious Mexican drug cartels, and the gangs that operate
in our state on their behalf , as we support the men and women of law enforcement who
remain on the front lines of this struggle.

I also want to thank Senator Williams and Representative Solomons for supporting my
efforts to abolish sanctuary city policies, restrictions that handcuff our police officers as
they work to uphold the law and protect our communities.

Joining us today is Officer Joslyn Johnson from Houston, whose husband, Rodney, was
killed by an undocumented alien, who had previously been in police custody multiple
times. Texas law enforcement professionals must have the discretion to use their
judgment; judgment honed by years of training and experience, when it comes to
inquiring about immigration status during lawful detentions and apprehensions. Thank
you, Sgt. Johnson for being here and for your grace and courage in these difficult times.
It is also time to seriously address the demand side of illegal immigration. We must
establish criminal penalties for employers who knowingly hire workers who are here in
violation of immigration law.

At the same time, we need to increase the heat on the parasites who repeatedly exploit
those seeking a better life in our state. I want to commend Representatives Senfronia
Thompson and Randy Weber for their unrelenting focus on Human Trafficking, which
impacts far too many in our state. It's time to target the worst offenders with a 25-year

Page 9 of 12

12
minimum sentence for a first conviction for Continuous Human Trafficking, and life
without parole for repeat offenders.

I'll tell you, it's frustrating that we're still having these border security conversations, but
Washington remains an abject failure in this area. It is part of that frustrating paradox
where Washington neglects their responsibility for areas clearly within their purview,
while interfering in other areas in which they're neither welcome nor authorized.

Despite our frequent requests, Washington has yet to dedicate sufficient resources to
secure our international border. We still need 1,000 National Guard troops to support
current law enforcement operations on our border until they can provide those 3,000
more border patrol agents. We also need Predator drones flying along the Texas-Mexico
border, providing real time intel to our state and local operation centers.

It's time for our delegation in Washington, on both sides of the aisle, to step up and speak
out in support of our state's needs. If it seems that their interest in this legislative session
is higher than usual, that's to be expected in a redistricting year.

When you do hear from our Congressmen, try guiding the conversation away from
redistricting, and suggest that they should be asking "How can I help Texas by ending
federal mandates or easing the growth of Medicaid costs?"
Then ask them about their progress on repealing the Doggett amendment that is taking
more than $830 million from Texas schoolchildren and teachers right now.

Enlist them in our ongoing battle with an activist EPA, intent on derailing our Texas air
quality program, which is cleaning our air as we create jobs.

Tell them it's time to repeal Obamacare, with its mandates that will cripple our healthcare
system, and a price tag that will bust our budget.

Our Medicaid population and accompanying financial burden are growing as we speak,
and, in 2014, ObamaCare will cause them to explode. This Washington-centric healthcare
plan puts many states on a collision course with bankruptcy.

Instead of oppressive mandates, we need solutions like block grants, and the freedom to
improve health care delivery, with innovation, flexibility and local input from leaders like
Senator Jane Nelson.

We most definitely do not need Washington encroaching even further on our individual
liberties.

I hope you'll support Representative Creighton's legislation stating the simple truth -
upheld by at least two federal courts, that it's unconstitutional and wrong for the
government to force someone to buy health insurance.

Page 10 of 12

13
In this and other areas of overreach, we must be united in sending one clear and simple
message to Washington: "Enough."

The differences between Texas values and Washington's self-serving games have never
been more stark than they are right now. The federal government's efforts to accumulate
more power, by bribing us with our own tax dollars are simply unacceptable.

We must continue to call attention to the essential truth of the 10th Amendment and
commit these 28 words to memory: The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or
to the people.

Our founders knew that a federal government powerful enough to run our lives would be
powerful enough to rob us of our liberties. In this chamber, where so many great Texas
leaders have served, we affirm the principle of state sovereignty, and proclaim without
reservation that Texans can run Texas better than bureaucrats in Washington DC.

Where Washington encroaches upon the rights of states, this state will push back with
resolve and the full force of the law. In that regard, we are blessed to have a leader with
the wisdom and courage of Attorney General Greg Abbott, who is using every resource at
his disposal and working with Texas lawmakers to protect the best interests of our state.

Some will say we're just spoiling for a fight, and I'll admit that Texans rarely walk away
from a tussle, but we'll also never walk away from our freedom. Our state was built on
that that freedom and its unlimited opportunity.

The spirit of discovery and adventure that drove the earliest settlers still beats in the
hearts of Texans everywhere, as they push past the known into the unknown, in the
laboratory, in the marketplace and in our universities.

Long known for our bountiful natural resources, Texas is now esteemed for its greatest
resource, the intellect and character of our people.

Our culture of sturdy pragmatism, forged through centuries of exploration, exertion and
endurance strengthens our resolve, and equips us to overcome the challenges we now
face together.

As other states flounder about, oppressing their citizens with more taxes and driving
away jobs with bad policy, Texas will make the right decisions, and emerge stronger.

As I've said before, I believe this will someday be regarded as the Texas century, as our
resolve, our discipline and our commitment to one another carry us to brighter days, and
blazes a path for other states and even for our federal government to follow. Our charge
is to lead and, together, we will blaze this path.

Page 11 of 12

14
May God bless you all and, through you, may He continue to bless the great state of
Texas.

Page 12 of 12

15
Plan to fix Texas budget hole taking shape
By JAY ROOT
© 2011 The Associated Press

Feb. 12, 2011, 9:12AM

AUSTIN, Texas — Texas lawmakers who make fiscal austerity their calling card have come face-
to-face in recent weeks with the specter of staggering cuts to public education and health care,
and they appear ready to blink.

There is still no groundswell for new taxes, and nobody expects one. But as the Legislature
moves into the nitty-gritty of writing an extra-lean budget, there is growing agreement that more
revenue — billions of it — will be needed to help bridge the gap.

The two biggest and most popular sources of new money: The so-called Rainy Day Fund and
old-fashioned, smoke-and-mirrors accounting gimmicks. These options could wipe out half or
more of the shortfall, officially estimated at $15 billion. It's also possible an improving economy
will fatten tax collections, though the official in charge of making those estimates says legislators
shouldn't count on it.

"It's insane not to use the Rainy Day Fund," said Sen. Kevin Eltife, a Republican from
conservative Tyler.

Even Gov. Rick Perry, who has repeatedly opposed tapping the state's savings account for the
shortfall, last week cracked open the door to using part of the account — just not "emptying" it.
The Rainy Day Fund will have more than $9 billion in it when the next budget period ends in
2013, officials say.

"I think the political argument is going to revolve not on whether you spend it or not, but how
much do you spend," said Sen. Steve Ogden, author of the Senate version of the budget and
chairman of the chamber's powerful Senate Finance Committee.

Accounting tricks are another easy option. Influential state Rep. Jim Pitts, chairman of the
House Appropriations Committee, said the payment deferrals would bring in anywhere from $2
billion to $4 billion, and officials say there is broad agreement for doing it.

Modest fee increases also are possible, and more than $800 million in federal education money
could be added before the session ends in May. The federal dough has been tied up in a partisan
squabble between Austin and Washington.

It's too early to say what the final state budget will look like this summer, and cuts are likely to be
painful and probably historic — particularly in public education. But it's clear that the spending
plan that goes into effect next year will have a lot more money in it than the first drafts that are
causing such alarm among lawmakers, health care providers and school districts.

The budget is "not going to be anywhere near (as low as) what's being discussed right now," said
Bill Hammond, president of the conservative Texas Association of Business, a chamber-of-
commerce type group. "Even the most ferociously conservative members understand that."

Hammond last week urged lawmakers to make up the $15 billion with new revenue that included
legalizing gambling, dipping into the huge Rainy Day Fund, kicking forward certain large financial

Page 1 of 3

16
obligations into the future and broader use of a multi-billion dollar education endowment to pay for
public school programs.

Gambling would be the toughest and least likely among the options in the conservative
Legislature. But top state leaders now agree the Rainy Day Fund will be tapped for at least $3-4
billion, maybe more.

The talk of new revenue comes as lawmakers are beginning to hear from educators, health care
providers and advocates for the poor about the impact of the proposals under consideration in the
Legislature. The initial budgets would leave public schools with up to $10 billion short, or 25
percent less state funding, than what state law requires, figures show.

That has prompted fears that tens of thousands of teachers could be laid off and that school
campuses could be shuttered and consolidated.

"The cuts we've seen are very severe," said conservative Republican Rep. George Lavender of
Texarkana, a newly elected tea-party-backed member who campaigned against bloated
government. "I'm hoping this will be just an initial budget and we'll be able to restore a lot of the
funding for schools."

Lavender said he opposes tax increases but would favor taking money from the Rainy Day Fund.

Rep. Jim Keffer, R-Eastland, said voters in his district are beginning to hear about the cuts and
are calling his office flummoxed. Taking a swipe at Perry, Keffer said many of them had been
listening to the governor's lofty campaign rhetoric and now see a different reality.

"I'm getting a lot of emails and phone calls from people who are surprised that we even have a
budget problem at all based on what his campaign looked like," Keffer said. "There's a lot of
people waking up to the fact that we have, not just a little deficit, but a big bear."

Keffer said he could not vote for the bill as currently drafted and has no doubt the final legislation
will have more funding in it, including money for tiny Ranger College in his district. It's one of four
community colleges targeted for closure in the first draft of the budget.

Republicans have pushed through cuts before. In 2003, lawmakers emptied the Rainy Day Fund,
then far smaller at about $1.2 billion. They also raised almost $3 billion in fees and cost-shifting
moves and used accounting gimmicks and deep spending reductions in social services to help
make up a $10 billion shortfall.

But the proposed cuts this year are fraying nerves like never before. Sen. Leticia Van De Putte,
leader of the Senate Democrats, said tearful testimony has made the budget-writing Senate
Finance Committee take on the feel of a "funeral parlor."

"We're having to put out Kleenex boxes at all the different seats everywhere, because of the
families, the Texans, who understand what a precarious situation we're in."

Democratic Sen. Kirk Watson says Republican leaders are deliberately promoting worst-case
scenarios so they can "save the day" by passing a budget that's not quite as awful as it might
have been.

Even after tapping into more revenue to enlarge the draft budget, Pitts, the chief House budget,
predicts the final product will be the grimmest he's ever seen.

Page 2 of 3

17
"This is my 20th year and this is the biggest cut I know of," Pitts said. "People compare it to '03,
but `03 was a cakewalk compared to this."

Page 3 of 3

18
Texas' budget challenges could persist beyond
2011
Some lawmakers, others advocate fixing 'structural deficit'
By Kate Alexander
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Published: 10:22 p.m. Monday, Jan. 31, 2011

Texas' budget problems will not go away when legislators eventually sign a balanced budget
later this year, senators heard on Monday.

A $10 billion budget shortfall will reappear in future legislative sessions again and again
unless lawmakers better align how much money comes in and how much goes out, said
John Heleman, chief revenue estimator for Comptroller Susan Combs.

Some state leaders have attributed the state's budget woes solely to the economic downturn
and have vowed to deal with the current budget shortfall, estimated at $15 billion to $27
billion, through spending cuts alone.

Heleman, with some prompting from senators, said a "structural deficit" developed in the
state budget after the 2006 school finance reform package that lowered local school property
taxes and restructured the business tax.

After the Texas Supreme Court found the state's school finance system to be
unconstitutional, the state increased its contribution to public education to the tune of $14
billion in each two-year budget.

But the costs of that tax swap have been greater than expected, and the revenue sources
meant to pay for it — primarily the revised business tax — have not covered the cost. The
combined taxes will generate $4.5 billion in the 2012-13 biennium.

"We need to not fool ourselves that this is a one-time phenomenon," said state Sen. John
Whitmire, D-Houston, who instigated the discussion at the first meeting of the Senate
Finance Committee. "We need to be grown up and deal with reality and make plans for the
future of Texas."

That reality might well be creating a bit of a thaw among legislators who have been averse to
raising any new revenue. Last week, the Senate released a base budget that reduced overall
spending of state and federal dollars by about 15 percent and included significant cuts to
public education and social services.

Florence Shapiro, the Plano Republican who leads the Senate Education Committee, said
many of those education cuts were "unacceptable."

She predicted there will probably be a "tremendous appetite" for changing the business tax
given its poor performance. She also supports tapping some of the $9.4 billion rainy day
fund.

Page 1 of 2

19
John Folks, superintendent of San Antonio's Northside school district, was part of a
contingent of school administrators at the Capitol on Monday to urge lawmakers to make
education a budget priority.

Folks called the structural deficit "unconscionable" and called on lawmakers to fix it.

"Let's make one thing clear: This funding crisis did not start with a shortfall in revenue," he
said at a morning rally. "This funding crisis, as others have said, started in 2006 when the
Legislature created one of the most inequitable and inadequate school finance systems
that's around."

Dale Craymer, president of the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association , said there is a
tendency to blame the business tax for the current budget problems though the poor
economy is a much bigger driver.

Any change to the tax will probably increase the burden on businesses at a tenuous time in
the economic recovery, Craymer said.

Billy Hamilton, a former deputy comptroller, said in an interview that there was always an
understanding that the 2006 tax changes did not completely pay for themselves.

"As long as the economy was going great guns, there was a structural problem, but it was a
manageable structural problem," Hamilton said. "When you run into the Great Recession,
your options get narrowed real fast. ... They basically go away."

Unlike the federal government, Texas is constitutionally required to balance its budget every
two years.

Legislators face a $4.3 billion deficit in the current budget and must close it before the end of
the two-year budget period on Aug. 31. They have already called for spending cuts that will
produce $1.3 billion in savings and could use the rainy day fund to cover the remainder.

Legislators will soon take up a resolution calling for a constitutional amendment that would
force the federal government to balance its budget in a similar manner.

kalexander@statesman.com; 474-2847

Page 2 of 2

20
Impact of Reducing Public Education Funding
by $5 billion per Year
January 21, 2011

The attached HB 1 budget reduction printouts and summary information were produced by Moak,
Casey & Associates. These estimates were originally released to the TASBO Pipeline members on
Wednesday, January 19, the same day HB 1 was filed. The TASBO Pipeline provides its members
with early updates on major legislative issues, multi-year financial projections on our new web-
based system, projections of impact for all major proposals on school finance, and regular reports
on all newly introduced education legislation.

If you are interested in the TASBO Pipeline service, please visit:

http://www.tasbo.org/resources/programs/tasbo-legislative-pipeline

Summary of HB 1 (Public Education Reductions)


The House introduced its initial version of the General Appropriations Act (House Bill 1) for the
2012-13 biennium on Wednesday, January 19. While it is the first draft of the state budget with
many hearings and floor debates to come, it does indicate that substantial budget reductions to
public education are likely.

In addition to eliminating almost all discretionary grant programs ($1.3 billion in General Revenue
over the biennium) in this first draft, HB 1, as filed, reduces the Foundation School Program by $10
billion below what was requested by the Texas Education Agency.

Some of the grant programs that were eliminated in the 2012-13 biennium include: the technology
allotment ($270.9 million), New IFA ($52 million), property value decline protections, ADA decline
provisions ($22 million), DAEP funding, the Reading, Mathematics, and Science Initiatives ($16.1
million), the Early High School Scholarship Program ($43.2 million), the Pre-Kindergarten Grant
Program ($223.3 million) , all of the grant programs funded under the Student Success Initiative
($293.2 million) , the High School Completion and Success Initiative ($86 million), the LEP Student
Success Initiative ($19,4 million), the DATE program ($385.1 million), science lab grants ($35
million), middle school PE grants ($20 million), virtual school network ($20.3 million), the steroid
testing program ($2 million), school bus seat belt program ($10 million), the optional extended
year program ($14.1 million), teen parenting ($19.7 million), and the AP Incentive Program ($28.4
million).

HB 1 also includes a rider that stipulates that the appropriation for the foundation school program
assumes passage of a bill that reduces FSP entitlements to a level that would fit within appropriated
funds, meaning that the legislature is not planning to make school finance changes in the
appropriations bill but will work on passage of a separate school finance bill.

District-by-District Impact www.moakcasey.com Page 1

21
Moak, Casey & Associates Budget Reduction Printouts Description

There are numerous ways that the $10 billion in reductions to the FSP could be implemented (this
amount does not include any reductions made to the grant programs). Moak, Casey & Associates
chose to show the effects of three potential scenarios. Each is designed to remove $5 billion per
year from the FSP. The three options illustrated are as follows and correspond to the columns in the
spreadsheet attached:

Proration: If the legislature were to do nothing to the school finance formulas, but pass an
appropriations bill that under-funds the state aid that the current formulas dictate, then proration
would automatically ensue (TEC 42.253(h)). Proration is designed to be wealth-based, so each
district’s share of a funding shortfall would be based on its share of total statewide property wealth.
In the scenario attached, we assume that ASATR payments are eligible for proration, and that the
statute would allow proration to occur in each year of the biennium.

Percentage reduction to total General Fund: In the second scenario, a 14.95 percent reduction to
each district’s projected 2011-12 General Fund revenue (state aid and local taxes net of recapture)
would be made to the state aid the district receives. For those that receive insufficient state aid, it
is assumed they would be required to pay additional recapture.

Eliminate ASATR, Reduce Basic Allotment: The final scenario assumes that the legislature
withheld revenue by reducing payments under the additional state aid for tax reduction (ASATR)
program. To get to a savings of $5 billion per year, the legislature would need to not only eliminate
ASATR payments, but also reduce the basic allotment to $4,304 and the equalized wealth level up to
the compressed tax rate to $430,400.

District-by-District Impact www.moakcasey.com Page 2

22
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
ANDERSON COUNTY 001902 CAYUGA ISD -$990,672 -$856,964 -$1,323,222
ANDERSON COUNTY 001903 ELKHART ISD -$752,913 -$1,442,078 -$893,285
ANDERSON COUNTY 001904 FRANKSTON ISD -$939,941 -$872,058 -$775,072
ANDERSON COUNTY 001906 NECHES ISD -$299,338 -$463,085 -$285,205
ANDERSON COUNTY 001907 PALESTINE ISD -$3,113,270 -$3,339,154 -$2,057,724
ANDERSON COUNTY 001909 SLOCUM ISD -$312,147 -$513,486 -$589,100
ANDERSON COUNTY 001908 WESTWOOD ISD -$1,361,702 -$1,663,917 -$1,584,260
ANDREWS COUNTY 002901 ANDREWS ISD -$6,512,944 -$3,998,965 -$6,197,712
ANGELINA COUNTY 003907 CENTRAL ISD -$852,480 -$1,597,886 -$905,380
ANGELINA COUNTY 003905 DIBOLL ISD -$900,365 -$1,951,085 -$1,227,484
ANGELINA COUNTY 003902 HUDSON ISD -$1,098,851 -$2,613,028 -$2,223,528
ANGELINA COUNTY 003904 HUNTINGTON ISD -$639,392 -$1,778,434 -$1,033,229
ANGELINA COUNTY 003903 LUFKIN ISD -$6,986,678 -$8,011,364 -$5,679,957
ANGELINA COUNTY 003906 ZAVALLA ISD -$272,445 -$584,970 -$325,602
ARANSAS COUNTY 004901 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD -$6,688,674 -$4,005,148 -$6,326,805
ARCHER COUNTY 005901 ARCHER CITY ISD -$564,782 -$666,200 -$967,753
ARCHER COUNTY 005902 HOLLIDAY ISD -$761,109 -$952,939 -$775,490
ARCHER COUNTY 005904 WINDTHORST ISD -$192,287 -$621,956 -$412,009
ARMSTRONG COUNTY 006902 CLAUDE ISD -$381,848 -$458,230 -$702,312
ATASCOSA COUNTY 007901 CHARLOTTE ISD -$317,398 -$687,251 -$697,978
ATASCOSA COUNTY 007902 JOURDANTON ISD -$1,381,361 -$1,518,631 -$1,365,101
ATASCOSA COUNTY 007904 LYTLE ISD -$682,786 -$1,749,559 -$1,198,027
ATASCOSA COUNTY 007905 PLEASANTON ISD -$2,130,078 -$3,298,074 -$2,087,209
ATASCOSA COUNTY 007906 POTEET ISD -$574,998 -$1,831,141 -$1,292,465
AUSTIN COUNTY 008901 BELLVILLE ISD -$2,936,943 -$2,326,810 -$2,246,526
AUSTIN COUNTY 008903 BRAZOS ISD -$1,051,024 -$960,211 -$848,692
AUSTIN COUNTY 008902 SEALY ISD -$3,534,246 -$2,904,333 -$4,078,065
BAILEY COUNTY 009901 MULESHOE ISD -$790,006 -$1,604,490 -$1,020,399
BANDERA COUNTY 010902 BANDERA ISD -$3,875,327 -$2,762,028 -$3,418,769
BANDERA COUNTY 010901 MEDINA ISD -$581,056 -$502,229 -$562,437
BASTROP COUNTY 011901 BASTROP ISD -$8,311,642 -$8,957,814 -$5,368,017
BASTROP COUNTY 011902 ELGIN ISD -$2,806,784 -$4,214,285 -$2,548,788
BASTROP COUNTY 011905 MCDADE ISD -$218,776 -$219,873 -$145,237
BASTROP COUNTY 011904 SMITHVILLE ISD -$1,779,544 -$1,727,390 -$1,022,443
BAYLOR COUNTY 012901 SEYMOUR ISD -$458,286 -$774,171 -$536,408
BEE COUNTY 013901 BEEVILLE ISD -$1,816,032 -$3,392,867 -$2,092,584
BEE COUNTY 013902 PAWNEE ISD -$378,730 -$218,635 -$374,230
BEE COUNTY 013903 PETTUS ISD -$494,996 -$550,589 -$333,644
BEE COUNTY 013905 SKIDMORE-TYNAN ISD -$441,311 -$993,578 -$591,499
BELL COUNTY 014901 ACADEMY ISD -$683,686 -$1,146,263 -$760,111
BELL COUNTY 014902 BARTLETT ISD -$272,044 -$443,557 -$269,626
BELL COUNTY 014903 BELTON ISD -$6,139,678 -$9,679,261 -$7,125,992
BELL COUNTY 014905 HOLLAND ISD -$269,464 -$647,690 -$552,310
BELL COUNTY 014906 KILLEEN ISD -$19,207,238 -$38,716,133 -$36,137,885
BELL COUNTY 014907 ROGERS ISD -$446,905 -$917,750 -$633,135
BELL COUNTY 014908 SALADO ISD -$1,867,434 -$1,465,475 -$1,971,753

1 1/21/2011
23
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
BELL COUNTY 014909 TEMPLE ISD -$8,552,455 -$7,864,030 -$5,233,064
BELL COUNTY 014910 TROY ISD -$743,900 -$1,289,171 -$793,962
BEXAR COUNTY 015901 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD -$6,616,296 -$5,133,559 -$6,097,915
BEXAR COUNTY 015911 EAST CENTRAL ISD -$5,836,400 -$9,413,720 -$7,037,651
BEXAR COUNTY 015905 EDGEWOOD ISD -$2,831,146 -$12,895,216 -$7,284,707
BEXAR COUNTY 015904 HARLANDALE ISD -$3,948,574 -$15,371,754 -$8,729,281
BEXAR COUNTY 015916 JUDSON ISD -$19,086,984 -$22,221,604 -$17,787,731
BEXAR COUNTY 015910 NORTH EAST ISD -$86,527,038 -$70,053,313 -$96,582,230
BEXAR COUNTY 015915 NORTHSIDE ISD -$103,899,380 -$96,835,024 -$97,937,980
BEXAR COUNTY 015907 SAN ANTONIO ISD -$38,412,228 -$51,605,734 -$34,103,064
BEXAR COUNTY 015909 SOMERSET ISD -$1,072,398 -$3,800,094 -$2,513,323
BEXAR COUNTY 015908 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD -$3,969,380 -$9,966,188 -$6,152,446
BEXAR COUNTY 015917 SOUTHSIDE ISD -$1,521,147 -$5,209,554 -$3,164,016
BEXAR COUNTY 015912 SOUTHWEST ISD -$4,994,987 -$12,657,187 -$11,916,308
BLANCO COUNTY 016902 BLANCO ISD -$1,900,505 -$1,198,246 -$1,758,834
BLANCO COUNTY 016901 JOHNSON CITY ISD -$1,370,674 -$1,031,199 -$1,233,264
BORDEN COUNTY 017901 BORDEN COUNTY ISD -$1,122,848 -$681,178 -$1,095,718
BOSQUE COUNTY 018901 CLIFTON ISD -$1,446,280 -$1,196,242 -$1,029,019
BOSQUE COUNTY 018908 CRANFILLS GAP ISD -$213,812 -$188,190 -$142,036
BOSQUE COUNTY 018906 IREDELL ISD -$228,083 -$189,750 -$184,395
BOSQUE COUNTY 018907 KOPPERL ISD -$327,919 -$298,938 -$206,957
BOSQUE COUNTY 018902 MERIDIAN ISD -$440,628 -$700,858 -$1,053,692
BOSQUE COUNTY 018903 MORGAN ISD -$182,988 -$203,742 -$133,227
BOSQUE COUNTY 018904 VALLEY MILLS ISD -$606,260 -$724,029 -$440,635
BOSQUE COUNTY 018905 WALNUT SPRINGS ISD -$232,193 -$262,849 -$444,186
BOWIE COUNTY 019901 DEKALB ISD -$517,100 -$915,143 -$684,068
BOWIE COUNTY 019902 HOOKS ISD -$453,721 -$1,238,063 -$1,884,710
BOWIE COUNTY 019913 HUBBARD ISD -$58,041 -$152,995 -$115,141
BOWIE COUNTY 019914 LEARY ISD -$93,181 -$147,078 -$143,678
BOWIE COUNTY 019908 LIBERTY-EYLAU ISD -$1,584,978 -$3,018,641 -$1,923,310
BOWIE COUNTY 019910 MALTA ISD -$53,902 -$117,505 -$92,389
BOWIE COUNTY 019903 MAUD ISD -$174,554 -$689,036 -$606,961
BOWIE COUNTY 019905 NEW BOSTON ISD -$1,046,002 -$1,624,918 -$1,203,630
BOWIE COUNTY 019912 PLEASANT GROVE ISD -$2,508,213 -$2,019,154 -$2,370,493
BOWIE COUNTY 019911 RED LICK ISD -$497,578 -$450,902 -$708,144
BOWIE COUNTY 019906 REDWATER ISD -$601,466 -$1,243,996 -$1,170,779
BOWIE COUNTY 019909 SIMMS ISD -$302,135 -$780,055 -$1,196,822
BOWIE COUNTY 019907 TEXARKANA ISD -$5,889,253 -$7,392,469 -$6,056,428
BRAZORIA COUNTY 020901 ALVIN ISD -$11,341,438 -$19,463,211 -$10,566,411
BRAZORIA COUNTY 020902 ANGLETON ISD -$7,735,084 -$6,463,756 -$6,450,633
BRAZORIA COUNTY 020905 BRAZOSPORT ISD -$16,560,115 -$12,907,618 -$13,930,890
BRAZORIA COUNTY 020907 COLUMBIA-BRAZORIA ISD -$2,471,467 -$3,004,971 -$1,856,929
BRAZORIA COUNTY 020910 DAMON ISD -$135,952 -$255,151 -$230,453
BRAZORIA COUNTY 020904 DANBURY ISD -$557,376 -$883,037 -$741,457
BRAZORIA COUNTY 020908 PEARLAND ISD -$17,947,637 -$18,708,035 -$14,118,591
BRAZORIA COUNTY 020906 SWEENY ISD -$2,581,681 -$2,185,977 -$2,361,499

2 1/21/2011
24
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
BRAZOS COUNTY 021902 BRYAN ISD -$14,609,489 -$15,122,550 -$11,035,995
BRAZOS COUNTY 021901 COLLEGE STATION ISD -$13,441,003 -$10,671,640 -$12,417,717
BREWSTER COUNTY 022901 ALPINE ISD -$1,263,800 -$1,417,770 -$1,575,375
BREWSTER COUNTY 022902 MARATHON ISD -$195,069 -$196,399 -$119,276
BREWSTER COUNTY 022903 SAN VICENTE ISD -$23,151 -$103,635 -$116,499
BREWSTER COUNTY 022004 TERLINGUA CSD -$189,106 -$217,546 -$170,034
BRISCOE COUNTY 023902 SILVERTON ISD -$173,616 -$239,232 -$259,913
BROOKS COUNTY 024901 BROOKS COUNTY ISD -$2,768,485 -$2,127,524 -$4,366,386
BROWN COUNTY 025901 BANGS ISD -$806,223 -$1,181,200 -$1,051,357
BROWN COUNTY 025904 BLANKET ISD -$118,089 -$316,696 -$325,018
BROWN COUNTY 025908 BROOKESMITH ISD -$145,159 -$201,957 -$126,206
BROWN COUNTY 025902 BROWNWOOD ISD -$3,412,452 -$3,521,057 -$3,214,684
BROWN COUNTY 025909 EARLY ISD -$708,807 -$1,337,990 -$1,469,537
BROWN COUNTY 025905 MAY ISD -$390,035 -$357,604 -$409,850
BROWN COUNTY 025906 ZEPHYR ISD -$107,038 -$278,158 -$157,911
BURLESON COUNTY 026901 CALDWELL ISD -$2,210,337 -$2,067,533 -$2,449,610
BURLESON COUNTY 026903 SNOOK ISD -$455,185 -$636,157 -$591,854
BURLESON COUNTY 026902 SOMERVILLE ISD -$621,131 -$518,742 -$449,902
BURNET COUNTY 027903 BURNET CONS ISD -$5,288,093 -$3,675,821 -$3,949,063
BURNET COUNTY 027904 MARBLE FALLS ISD -$5,708,859 -$4,624,375 -$5,209,809
CALDWELL COUNTY 028902 LOCKHART ISD -$2,686,511 -$4,668,385 -$3,490,217
CALDWELL COUNTY 028903 LULING ISD -$1,044,950 -$1,462,800 -$1,704,953
CALDWELL COUNTY 028906 PRAIRIE LEA ISD -$318,538 -$320,287 -$586,183
CALHOUN COUNTY 029901 CALHOUN CO ISD -$4,822,917 -$4,630,248 -$4,366,139
CALLAHAN COUNTY 030903 BAIRD ISD -$328,510 -$505,798 -$471,678
CALLAHAN COUNTY 030902 CLYDE CONS ISD -$1,061,277 -$1,444,653 -$795,549
CALLAHAN COUNTY 030901 CROSS PLAINS ISD -$308,294 -$503,857 -$707,966
CALLAHAN COUNTY 030906 EULA ISD -$663,984 -$465,148 -$493,173
CAMERON COUNTY 031901 BROWNSVILLE ISD -$15,927,633 -$50,577,139 -$31,251,360
CAMERON COUNTY 031903 HARLINGEN CONS ISD -$9,653,034 -$18,813,603 -$11,678,498
CAMERON COUNTY 031905 LA FERIA ISD -$1,095,926 -$3,783,331 -$3,307,767
CAMERON COUNTY 031906 LOS FRESNOS CONS ISD -$3,748,692 -$10,360,938 -$7,262,812
CAMERON COUNTY 031909 POINT ISABEL ISD -$4,085,507 -$3,038,086 -$3,839,145
CAMERON COUNTY 031911 RIO HONDO ISD -$672,576 -$2,436,483 -$1,461,155
CAMERON COUNTY 031912 SAN BENITO CONS ISD -$2,535,579 -$12,470,267 -$6,863,820
CAMERON COUNTY 031913 SANTA MARIA ISD -$121,009 -$862,177 -$536,602
CAMERON COUNTY 031914 SANTA ROSA ISD -$218,107 -$1,405,524 -$828,820
CAMP COUNTY 032902 PITTSBURG ISD -$2,139,659 -$2,689,688 -$2,883,465
CARSON COUNTY 033901 GROOM ISD -$227,127 -$195,920 -$316,344
CARSON COUNTY 033902 PANHANDLE ISD -$1,201,828 -$934,218 -$1,096,451
CARSON COUNTY 033904 WHITE DEER ISD -$675,280 -$541,163 -$631,201
CASS COUNTY 034901 ATLANTA ISD -$1,492,027 -$1,861,948 -$1,759,858
CASS COUNTY 034902 AVINGER ISD -$167,687 -$211,186 -$202,119
CASS COUNTY 034909 BLOOMBURG ISD -$110,452 -$395,580 -$223,852
CASS COUNTY 034903 HUGHES SPRINGS ISD -$1,403,795 -$1,453,135 -$2,246,478
CASS COUNTY 034905 LINDEN-KILDARE CONS ISD -$666,628 -$987,099 -$553,738

3 1/21/2011
25
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
CASS COUNTY 034906 MCLEOD ISD -$102,871 -$565,323 -$763,231
CASS COUNTY 034907 QUEEN CITY ISD -$1,223,790 -$1,130,885 -$700,379
CASTRO COUNTY 035901 DIMMITT ISD -$664,863 -$1,400,769 -$858,349
CASTRO COUNTY 035902 HART ISD -$208,978 -$369,475 -$274,180
CASTRO COUNTY 035903 NAZARETH ISD -$99,738 -$296,991 -$164,195
CHAMBERS COUNTY 036901 ANAHUAC ISD -$933,045 -$1,384,192 -$1,016,529
CHAMBERS COUNTY 036902 BARBERS HILL ISD -$8,782,432 -$5,567,922 -$8,331,198
CHAMBERS COUNTY 036903 EAST CHAMBERS ISD -$755,738 -$1,492,025 -$1,436,405
CHEROKEE COUNTY 037901 ALTO ISD -$505,560 -$795,067 -$561,024
CHEROKEE COUNTY 037904 JACKSONVILLE ISD -$2,836,374 -$4,803,552 -$3,258,688
CHEROKEE COUNTY 037908 NEW SUMMERFIELD ISD -$124,372 -$736,828 -$1,302,625
CHEROKEE COUNTY 037907 RUSK ISD -$1,185,476 -$2,140,330 -$1,307,073
CHEROKEE COUNTY 037909 WELLS ISD -$344,471 -$367,009 -$228,092
CHILDRESS COUNTY 038901 CHILDRESS ISD -$661,111 -$1,323,892 -$1,100,871
CLAY COUNTY 039904 BELLEVUE ISD -$134,372 -$184,247 -$112,690
CLAY COUNTY 039901 BYERS ISD -$69,846 -$120,476 -$67,729
CLAY COUNTY 039902 HENRIETTA ISD -$1,006,052 -$1,078,049 -$817,240
CLAY COUNTY 039905 MIDWAY ISD -$253,892 -$206,540 -$215,772
CLAY COUNTY 039903 PETROLIA ISD -$281,241 -$542,638 -$329,779
COCHRAN COUNTY 040901 MORTON ISD -$209,497 -$557,939 -$456,486
COCHRAN COUNTY 040902 WHITEFACE CONS ISD -$1,757,780 -$871,691 -$1,714,701
COKE COUNTY 041901 BRONTE ISD -$284,387 -$382,219 -$358,498
COKE COUNTY 041902 ROBERT LEE ISD -$371,140 -$388,925 -$343,669
COLEMAN COUNTY 042901 COLEMAN ISD -$361,816 -$1,146,704 -$979,113
COLEMAN COUNTY 042906 NOVICE ISD -$136,827 -$136,101 -$86,849
COLEMAN COUNTY 042905 PANTHER CREEK CONS ISD -$257,822 -$265,034 -$171,751
COLEMAN COUNTY 042903 SANTA ANNA ISD -$173,823 -$396,046 -$252,184
COLLIN COUNTY 043901 ALLEN ISD -$23,221,005 -$18,489,483 -$19,561,306
COLLIN COUNTY 043902 ANNA ISD -$1,656,054 -$2,859,425 -$3,749,424
COLLIN COUNTY 043917 BLUE RIDGE ISD -$389,216 -$797,673 -$458,231
COLLIN COUNTY 043903 CELINA ISD -$2,090,339 -$2,243,924 -$2,231,569
COLLIN COUNTY 043918 COMMUNITY ISD -$1,472,071 -$1,728,994 -$1,373,998
COLLIN COUNTY 043904 FARMERSVILLE ISD -$1,068,800 -$1,477,599 -$1,133,093
COLLIN COUNTY 043905 FRISCO ISD -$51,469,062 -$40,394,290 -$84,130,998
COLLIN COUNTY 043919 LOVEJOY ISD -$4,717,701 -$4,745,921 -$12,306,784
COLLIN COUNTY 043907 MCKINNEY ISD -$28,410,008 -$25,248,126 -$36,401,675
COLLIN COUNTY 043908 MELISSA ISD -$1,359,873 -$1,910,323 -$2,368,103
COLLIN COUNTY 043910 PLANO ISD -$65,697,981 -$57,068,521 -$58,934,267
COLLIN COUNTY 043911 PRINCETON ISD -$1,619,884 -$3,415,702 -$3,153,775
COLLIN COUNTY 043912 PROSPER ISD -$4,993,279 -$6,708,239 -$16,892,808
COLLIN COUNTY 043914 WYLIE ISD -$10,214,012 -$13,746,289 -$11,521,637
COLLINGSWORTH COUNTY 044904 SAMNORWOOD ISD -$125,474 -$158,631 -$187,979
COLLINGSWORTH COUNTY 044902 WELLINGTON ISD -$302,396 -$756,329 -$681,605
COLORADO COUNTY 045902 COLUMBUS ISD -$2,325,739 -$1,698,212 -$1,856,753
COLORADO COUNTY 045903 RICE CONS ISD -$1,987,469 -$1,673,869 -$1,987,865
COLORADO COUNTY 045905 WEIMAR ISD -$816,372 -$771,568 -$1,086,099

4 1/21/2011
26
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
COMAL COUNTY 046902 COMAL ISD -$29,215,763 -$17,698,947 -$26,713,770
COMAL COUNTY 046901 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD -$9,419,662 -$7,648,104 -$8,557,373
COMANCHE COUNTY 047901 COMANCHE ISD -$866,593 -$1,361,871 -$2,147,646
COMANCHE COUNTY 047902 DE LEON ISD -$491,157 -$837,395 -$1,212,029
COMANCHE COUNTY 047903 GUSTINE ISD -$135,450 -$285,159 -$197,554
COMANCHE COUNTY 047905 SIDNEY ISD -$67,714 -$186,269 -$193,122
CONCHO COUNTY 048901 EDEN CONS ISD -$453,305 -$394,199 -$421,138
CONCHO COUNTY 048903 PAINT ROCK ISD -$207,231 -$231,022 -$156,526
COOKE COUNTY 049905 CALLISBURG ISD -$1,727,787 -$1,585,323 -$2,532,483
COOKE COUNTY 049906 ERA ISD -$384,849 -$553,024 -$429,327
COOKE COUNTY 049901 GAINESVILLE ISD -$2,974,145 -$2,582,249 -$1,822,848
COOKE COUNTY 049907 LINDSAY ISD -$629,583 -$634,512 -$871,412
COOKE COUNTY 049902 MUENSTER ISD -$227,780 -$540,409 -$179,004
COOKE COUNTY 049909 SIVELLS BEND ISD -$149,647 -$111,199 -$146,647
COOKE COUNTY 049903 VALLEY VIEW ISD -$569,160 -$790,816 -$466,986
COOKE COUNTY 049908 WALNUT BEND ISD -$88,696 -$111,918 -$141,866
CORYELL COUNTY 050910 COPPERAS COVE ISD -$3,821,700 -$7,550,064 -$6,188,549
CORYELL COUNTY 050901 EVANT ISD -$245,986 -$285,045 -$324,345
CORYELL COUNTY 050902 GATESVILLE ISD -$1,790,566 -$2,938,372 -$3,011,101
CORYELL COUNTY 050909 JONESBORO ISD -$183,517 -$185,089 -$141,198
CORYELL COUNTY 050904 OGLESBY ISD -$108,194 -$243,973 -$469,607
COTTLE COUNTY 051901 PADUCAH ISD -$496,568 -$373,199 -$463,207
CRANE COUNTY 052901 CRANE ISD -$5,126,452 -$2,205,979 -$5,026,543
CROCKETT COUNTY 053001 CROCKETT CO CONS CSD -$2,299,420 -$1,370,048 -$2,211,514
CROSBY COUNTY 054901 CROSBYTON ISD -$256,615 -$579,622 -$553,307
CROSBY COUNTY 054902 LORENZO ISD -$392,692 -$404,180 -$387,605
CROSBY COUNTY 054903 RALLS ISD -$322,656 -$619,922 -$360,669
CULBERSON COUNTY 055901 CULBERSON COUNTY-ALLAMOORE ISD-$979,822 -$659,809 -$791,133
DALLAM COUNTY 056901 DALHART ISD -$1,437,006 -$1,684,580 -$1,311,074
DALLAM COUNTY 056902 TEXLINE ISD -$292,781 -$274,565 -$151,027
DALLAS COUNTY 057903 CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD-$43,837,422 -$27,095,676 -$39,486,272
DALLAS COUNTY 057904 CEDAR HILL ISD -$8,746,503 -$7,936,501 -$6,514,433
DALLAS COUNTY 057922 COPPELL ISD -$12,618,692 -$10,600,050 -$11,651,920
DALLAS COUNTY 057905 DALLAS ISD -$253,040,290 -$168,388,973 -$238,851,428
DALLAS COUNTY 057906 DESOTO ISD -$7,180,290 -$9,240,566 -$5,585,396
DALLAS COUNTY 057907 DUNCANVILLE ISD -$10,512,805 -$12,851,078 -$7,997,224
DALLAS COUNTY 057909 GARLAND ISD -$43,815,145 -$55,608,117 -$33,430,427
DALLAS COUNTY 057910 GRAND PRAIRIE ISD -$14,996,373 -$25,989,206 -$16,081,423
DALLAS COUNTY 057911 HIGHLAND PARK ISD -$10,947,752 -$6,861,521 -$10,315,275
DALLAS COUNTY 057912 IRVING ISD -$29,492,840 -$32,843,000 -$21,687,291
DALLAS COUNTY 057913 LANCASTER ISD -$4,948,541 -$6,256,883 -$5,181,753
DALLAS COUNTY 057914 MESQUITE ISD -$19,909,099 -$37,658,966 -$28,370,669
DALLAS COUNTY 057916 RICHARDSON ISD -$54,177,353 -$35,207,190 -$41,843,547
DALLAS COUNTY 057919 SUNNYVALE ISD -$2,363,738 -$1,596,229 -$2,930,135
DAWSON COUNTY 058902 DAWSON -$431,229 -$285,118 -$413,912
DAWSON COUNTY 058905 KLONDIKE ISD -$974,709 -$458,311 -$950,523

5 1/21/2011
27
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
DAWSON COUNTY 058906 LAMESA ISD -$1,369,814 -$2,088,648 -$1,223,295
DAWSON COUNTY 058909 SANDS ISD -$636,764 -$389,429 -$613,091
DEAF SMITH COUNTY 059901 HEREFORD ISD -$3,109,039 -$4,169,437 -$2,690,617
DEAF SMITH COUNTY 059902 WALCOTT ISD -$142,076 -$158,798 -$405,397
DELTA COUNTY 060902 COOPER ISD -$482,281 -$999,850 -$557,051
DELTA COUNTY 060914 FANNINDEL ISD -$179,354 -$268,527 -$186,371
DENTON COUNTY 061910 ARGYLE ISD -$2,949,469 -$2,004,985 -$2,681,658
DENTON COUNTY 061907 AUBREY ISD -$1,789,357 -$2,077,325 -$2,293,897
DENTON COUNTY 061901 DENTON ISD -$30,125,038 -$27,576,437 -$44,337,030
DENTON COUNTY 061905 KRUM ISD -$2,295,866 -$2,271,157 -$5,155,994
DENTON COUNTY 061912 LAKE DALLAS ISD -$4,026,559 -$4,289,129 -$3,007,847
DENTON COUNTY 061902 LEWISVILLE ISD -$73,790,955 -$57,181,191 -$74,256,857
DENTON COUNTY 061914 LITTLE ELM ISD -$5,336,225 -$6,619,399 -$6,991,556
DENTON COUNTY 061911 NORTHWEST ISD -$34,232,473 -$19,438,825 -$36,985,555
DENTON COUNTY 061903 PILOT POINT ISD -$1,657,032 -$1,625,177 -$908,319
DENTON COUNTY 061906 PONDER ISD -$3,128,614 -$1,879,165 -$3,676,011
DENTON COUNTY 061908 SANGER ISD -$2,267,119 -$2,710,842 -$2,466,895
DEWITT COUNTY 062901 CUERO ISD -$1,434,789 -$2,161,979 -$2,923,352
DEWITT COUNTY 062906 MEYERSVILLE ISD -$260,826 -$261,538 -$516,479
DEWITT COUNTY 062902 NORDHEIM ISD -$311,239 -$227,023 -$285,469
DEWITT COUNTY 062905 WESTHOFF ISD -$63,074 -$53,087 -$55,067
DEWITT COUNTY 062903 YOAKUM ISD -$1,237,014 -$1,594,740 -$1,161,542
DEWITT COUNTY 062904 YORKTOWN ISD -$458,496 -$610,379 -$552,259
DICKENS COUNTY 063906 PATTON SPRINGS ISD -$89,023 -$153,585 -$92,905
DICKENS COUNTY 063903 SPUR ISD -$912,385 -$561,837 -$878,950
DIMMIT COUNTY 064903 CARRIZO SPRINGS CONS ISD -$1,352,764 -$2,562,130 -$1,449,961
DONLEY COUNTY 065901 CLARENDON ISD -$426,104 -$765,456 -$867,843
DONLEY COUNTY 065902 HEDLEY ISD -$138,762 -$231,799 -$231,154
DUVAL COUNTY 066901 BENAVIDES ISD -$779,057 -$617,679 -$692,324
DUVAL COUNTY 066903 FREER ISD -$1,516,087 -$1,105,042 -$1,295,285
DUVAL COUNTY 066005 RAMIREZ CSD -$5,636 -$34,425 -$2,017
DUVAL COUNTY 066902 SAN DIEGO ISD -$426,050 -$1,439,557 -$966,998
EASTLAND COUNTY 067902 CISCO ISD -$1,342,356 -$1,160,324 -$1,769,422
EASTLAND COUNTY 067903 EASTLAND ISD -$1,138,366 -$1,251,692 -$1,061,804
EASTLAND COUNTY 067904 GORMAN ISD -$166,141 -$404,262 -$287,101
EASTLAND COUNTY 067907 RANGER ISD -$290,654 -$569,556 -$461,613
EASTLAND COUNTY 067908 RISING STAR ISD -$108,201 -$294,372 -$193,216
ECTOR COUNTY 068901 ECTOR COUNTY ISD -$30,037,856 -$26,459,450 -$26,058,301
EDWARDS COUNTY 069902 NUECES CANYON CONS ISD -$587,500 -$474,043 -$408,339
EDWARDS COUNTY 069901 ROCKSPRINGS ISD -$887,288 -$529,660 -$849,803
EL PASO COUNTY 071906 ANTHONY -$471,982 -$985,449 -$606,281
EL PASO COUNTY 071907 CANUTILLO ISD -$4,292,625 -$6,130,221 -$4,552,821
EL PASO COUNTY 071901 CLINT ISD -$2,967,331 -$11,244,223 -$6,966,884
EL PASO COUNTY 071902 EL PASO ISD -$46,255,851 -$61,528,151 -$44,852,515
EL PASO COUNTY 071903 FABENS ISD -$429,863 -$2,752,870 -$1,701,020
EL PASO COUNTY 071904 SAN ELIZARIO ISD -$453,572 -$4,359,404 -$2,602,062

6 1/21/2011
28
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
EL PASO COUNTY 071909 SOCORRO ISD -$22,206,977 -$40,923,535 -$41,637,272
EL PASO COUNTY 071908 TORNILLO ISD -$165,083 -$1,510,894 -$895,523
EL PASO COUNTY 071905 YSLETA ISD -$20,710,977 -$46,253,545 -$26,923,911
ELLIS COUNTY 070901 AVALON ISD -$103,104 -$464,046 -$253,008
ELLIS COUNTY 070903 ENNIS ISD -$5,453,936 -$5,878,089 -$4,113,099
ELLIS COUNTY 070905 FERRIS ISD -$1,036,852 -$2,645,309 -$1,573,248
ELLIS COUNTY 070907 ITALY ISD -$315,663 -$793,191 -$447,855
ELLIS COUNTY 070915 MAYPEARL ISD -$787,307 -$1,280,670 -$853,868
ELLIS COUNTY 070908 MIDLOTHIAN ISD -$8,901,589 -$7,830,547 -$10,323,220
ELLIS COUNTY 070909 MILFORD ISD -$222,791 -$355,277 -$294,272
ELLIS COUNTY 070910 PALMER ISD -$698,236 -$1,358,360 -$757,722
ELLIS COUNTY 070911 RED OAK ISD -$3,759,890 -$5,678,512 -$3,320,559
ELLIS COUNTY 070912 WAXAHACHIE ISD -$8,851,961 -$7,608,309 -$8,635,501
ERATH COUNTY 072904 BLUFF DALE ISD -$273,496 -$173,801 -$270,996
ERATH COUNTY 072902 DUBLIN ISD -$822,845 -$1,398,177 -$1,656,598
ERATH COUNTY 072908 HUCKABAY ISD -$372,744 -$253,447 -$331,174
ERATH COUNTY 072909 LINGLEVILLE ISD -$274,478 -$268,257 -$227,387
ERATH COUNTY 072910 MORGAN MILL ISD -$197,404 -$145,919 -$182,361
ERATH COUNTY 072903 STEPHENVILLE ISD -$3,987,627 -$3,373,500 -$2,540,473
ERATH COUNTY 072901 THREE WAY ISD -$141,066 -$88,284 -$127,762
FALLS COUNTY 073901 CHILTON ISD -$152,817 -$656,377 -$403,036
FALLS COUNTY 073903 MARLIN ISD -$599,364 -$1,329,787 -$948,688
FALLS COUNTY 073905 ROSEBUD-LOTT ISD -$392,581 -$975,769 -$2,038,287
FALLS COUNTY 073904 WESTPHALIA ISD -$48,189 -$155,919 -$175,809
FANNIN COUNTY 074903 BONHAM ISD -$1,727,586 -$1,923,520 -$1,176,557
FANNIN COUNTY 074904 DODD CITY ISD -$113,791 -$366,133 -$226,441
FANNIN COUNTY 074905 ECTOR ISD -$106,615 -$316,186 -$194,174
FANNIN COUNTY 074907 HONEY GROVE ISD -$456,821 -$713,652 -$544,533
FANNIN COUNTY 074909 LEONARD ISD -$427,980 -$1,142,292 -$876,580
FANNIN COUNTY 074917 SAM RAYBURN ISD -$257,279 -$545,946 -$357,076
FANNIN COUNTY 074911 SAVOY ISD -$275,755 -$377,476 -$229,535
FANNIN COUNTY 074912 TRENTON ISD -$469,648 -$698,940 -$685,790
FAYETTE COUNTY 075906 FAYETTEVILLE ISD -$400,740 -$302,843 -$359,054
FAYETTE COUNTY 075901 FLATONIA ISD -$736,365 -$706,823 -$658,512
FAYETTE COUNTY 075902 LA GRANGE ISD -$2,950,830 -$2,297,463 -$3,718,197
FAYETTE COUNTY 075908 ROUND TOP-CARMINE ISD -$453,102 -$344,310 -$429,515
FAYETTE COUNTY 075903 SCHULENBURG ISD -$1,046,642 -$870,258 -$911,007
FISHER COUNTY 076903 ROBY CONS ISD -$260,929 -$412,254 -$249,569
FISHER COUNTY 076904 ROTAN ISD -$227,402 -$477,017 -$270,035
FLOYD COUNTY 077901 FLOYDADA ISD -$680,822 -$1,021,689 -$628,139
FLOYD COUNTY 077902 LOCKNEY ISD -$266,706 -$657,570 -$378,568
FOARD COUNTY 078901 CROWELL ISD -$226,878 -$345,295 -$309,756
FORT BEND COUNTY 079907 FORT BEND ISD -$73,944,516 -$66,302,658 -$53,552,074
FORT BEND COUNTY 079908 KENDLETON ISD -$158,216 -$106,995 -$183,690
FORT BEND COUNTY 079901 LAMAR CONSOLIDATED ISD -$32,280,758 -$26,596,983 -$32,427,701
FORT BEND COUNTY 079906 NEEDVILLE ISD -$1,880,667 -$2,623,370 -$1,695,026

7 1/21/2011
29
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
FORT BEND COUNTY 079910 STAFFORD MSD -$3,074,864 -$3,397,464 -$2,643,365
FRANKLIN COUNTY 080901 MOUNT VERNON ISD -$2,441,598 -$1,754,443 -$2,125,113
FREESTONE COUNTY 081906 DEW ISD -$501,799 -$260,263 -$495,799
FREESTONE COUNTY 081902 FAIRFIELD ISD -$3,299,471 -$2,464,535 -$3,098,689
FREESTONE COUNTY 081904 TEAGUE ISD -$2,890,195 -$1,761,653 -$2,750,051
FREESTONE COUNTY 081905 WORTHAM ISD -$454,120 -$643,813 -$699,944
FRIO COUNTY 082902 DILLEY ISD -$404,427 -$1,250,900 -$714,511
FRIO COUNTY 082903 PEARSALL ISD -$1,135,902 -$2,500,647 -$1,799,603
GAINES COUNTY 083902 LOOP ISD -$625,455 -$316,323 -$606,995
GAINES COUNTY 083901 SEAGRAVES ISD -$777,587 -$1,020,509 -$2,652,132
GAINES COUNTY 083903 SEMINOLE ISD -$7,275,452 -$3,044,008 -$7,019,975
GALVESTON COUNTY 084910 CLEAR CREEK ISD -$49,531,510 -$39,878,986 -$50,572,898
GALVESTON COUNTY 084901 DICKINSON ISD -$7,511,221 -$9,482,535 -$7,673,700
GALVESTON COUNTY 084911 FRIENDSWOOD ISD -$6,482,732 -$5,438,985 -$4,673,285
GALVESTON COUNTY 084902 GALVESTON ISD -$8,029,949 -$6,319,169 -$7,412,492
GALVESTON COUNTY 084903 HIGH ISLAND ISD -$120,124 -$272,242 -$326,980
GALVESTON COUNTY 084908 HITCHCOCK ISD -$1,582,422 -$1,386,484 -$1,340,579
GALVESTON COUNTY 084904 LA MARQUE ISD -$4,460,076 -$3,389,388 -$3,184,231
GALVESTON COUNTY 084909 SANTA FE ISD -$2,944,732 -$4,301,078 -$2,713,736
GALVESTON COUNTY 084906 TEXAS CITY ISD -$11,814,438 -$6,554,462 -$10,541,555
GARZA COUNTY 085902 POST ISD -$1,939,991 -$1,227,321 -$1,796,395
GARZA COUNTY 085903 SOUTHLAND ISD -$235,593 -$234,552 -$177,312
GILLESPIE COUNTY 086024 DOSS CONS CSD -$2,112 -$17,938 -$2,112
GILLESPIE COUNTY 086901 FREDERICKSBURG ISD -$5,611,915 -$3,629,000 -$5,256,988
GILLESPIE COUNTY 086902 HARPER ISD -$984,955 -$887,415 -$1,060,511
GLASSCOCK COUNTY 087901 GLASSCOCK COUNTY ISD -$596,984 -$561,718 -$566,676
GOLIAD COUNTY 088902 GOLIAD ISD -$3,245,527 -$2,017,580 -$4,358,812
GONZALES COUNTY 089901 GONZALES ISD -$1,856,577 -$2,705,032 -$3,575,246
GONZALES COUNTY 089903 NIXON-SMILEY CONS ISD -$545,117 -$1,346,099 -$1,545,493
GONZALES COUNTY 089905 WAELDER ISD -$392,321 -$360,789 -$342,047
GRAY COUNTY 090905 GRANDVIEW-HOPKINS ISD -$109,402 -$71,157 -$106,402
GRAY COUNTY 090902 LEFORS ISD -$500,190 -$291,457 -$730,821
GRAY COUNTY 090903 MCLEAN ISD -$519,986 -$378,644 -$669,522
GRAY COUNTY 090904 PAMPA ISD -$3,321,977 -$3,436,722 -$2,803,106
GRAYSON COUNTY 091901 BELLS ISD -$489,902 -$965,431 -$816,096
GRAYSON COUNTY 091902 COLLINSVILLE ISD -$385,795 -$669,646 -$678,311
GRAYSON COUNTY 091903 DENISON ISD -$4,081,290 -$4,959,902 -$2,965,282
GRAYSON COUNTY 091917 GUNTER ISD -$695,065 -$986,526 -$872,605
GRAYSON COUNTY 091905 HOWE ISD -$596,075 -$1,047,513 -$645,960
GRAYSON COUNTY 091913 POTTSBORO ISD -$2,081,370 -$1,443,649 -$2,210,313
GRAYSON COUNTY 091914 S AND S CONS ISD -$1,045,318 -$956,185 -$890,240
GRAYSON COUNTY 091906 SHERMAN ISD -$7,360,892 -$6,585,369 -$4,744,957
GRAYSON COUNTY 091907 TIOGA ISD -$228,615 -$206,680 -$270,351
GRAYSON COUNTY 091918 TOM BEAN ISD -$464,375 -$880,214 -$647,144
GRAYSON COUNTY 091908 VAN ALSTYNE ISD -$1,283,675 -$1,409,263 -$893,178
GRAYSON COUNTY 091909 WHITESBORO ISD -$1,486,864 -$1,658,943 -$1,187,323

8 1/21/2011
30
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
GRAYSON COUNTY 091910 WHITEWRIGHT ISD -$496,027 -$907,507 -$532,216
GREGG COUNTY 092901 GLADEWATER ISD -$1,791,511 -$2,031,757 -$1,734,472
GREGG COUNTY 092902 KILGORE ISD -$5,586,459 -$3,760,295 -$3,771,466
GREGG COUNTY 092903 LONGVIEW ISD -$12,452,613 -$8,810,205 -$11,330,151
GREGG COUNTY 092904 PINE TREE ISD -$5,343,777 -$4,598,547 -$2,933,636
GREGG COUNTY 092906 SABINE ISD -$1,217,772 -$1,458,302 -$1,960,313
GREGG COUNTY 092907 SPRING HILL ISD -$1,405,809 -$1,634,658 -$1,063,240
GREGG COUNTY 092908 WHITE OAK ISD -$1,075,214 -$1,415,967 -$1,082,271
GRIMES COUNTY 093901 ANDERSON-SHIRO CONS ISD -$1,312,296 -$889,167 -$1,029,584
GRIMES COUNTY 093903 IOLA ISD -$477,099 -$615,591 -$592,284
GRIMES COUNTY 093904 NAVASOTA ISD -$3,934,427 -$2,909,091 -$2,496,197
GRIMES COUNTY 093905 RICHARDS ISD -$382,602 -$238,612 -$369,011
GUADALUPE COUNTY 094904 MARION ISD -$1,537,289 -$1,275,784 -$766,359
GUADALUPE COUNTY 094903 NAVARRO ISD -$1,622,035 -$1,630,941 -$940,787
GUADALUPE COUNTY 094902 SCHERTZ-CIBOLO-U CITY ISD -$10,680,682 -$13,045,625 -$14,941,986
GUADALUPE COUNTY 094901 SEGUIN ISD -$7,826,502 -$6,996,263 -$4,290,935
HALE COUNTY 095901 ABERNATHY ISD -$1,321,553 -$1,137,558 -$1,691,433
HALE COUNTY 095902 COTTON CENTER ISD -$114,102 -$203,544 -$114,952
HALE COUNTY 095903 HALE CENTER ISD -$239,477 -$778,018 -$478,380
HALE COUNTY 095904 PETERSBURG ISD -$175,638 -$339,743 -$191,367
HALE COUNTY 095905 PLAINVIEW ISD -$3,448,180 -$5,333,685 -$3,324,557
HALL COUNTY 096904 MEMPHIS ISD -$386,474 -$770,253 -$812,317
HALL COUNTY 096905 TURKEY-QUITAQUE ISD -$129,424 -$270,811 -$162,545
HAMILTON COUNTY 097902 HAMILTON ISD -$859,312 -$1,030,342 -$887,648
HAMILTON COUNTY 097903 HICO ISD -$483,948 -$845,531 -$1,024,930
HANSFORD COUNTY 098901 GRUVER ISD -$1,835,953 -$859,759 -$1,789,403
HANSFORD COUNTY 098903 PRINGLE-MORSE CONS ISD -$434,589 -$266,296 -$428,589
HANSFORD COUNTY 098904 SPEARMAN ISD -$1,298,654 -$1,215,359 -$1,865,653
HARDEMAN COUNTY 099902 CHILLICOTHE ISD -$362,078 -$266,671 -$377,028
HARDEMAN COUNTY 099903 QUANAH ISD -$692,999 -$802,098 -$794,613
HARDIN COUNTY 100905 HARDIN-JEFFERSON ISD -$3,172,400 -$2,195,284 -$2,871,527
HARDIN COUNTY 100903 KOUNTZE ISD -$1,068,913 -$1,345,901 -$894,651
HARDIN COUNTY 100907 LUMBERTON ISD -$2,630,870 -$3,921,141 -$3,870,211
HARDIN COUNTY 100904 SILSBEE ISD -$2,105,267 -$3,141,710 -$2,055,233
HARDIN COUNTY 100908 WEST HARDIN COUNTY CONS ISD -$543,545 -$676,520 -$422,943
HARRIS COUNTY 101902 ALDINE ISD -$42,884,279 -$65,596,951 -$39,674,404
HARRIS COUNTY 101903 ALIEF ISD -$34,373,240 -$46,627,508 -$27,125,268
HARRIS COUNTY 101905 CHANNELVIEW ISD -$7,837,532 -$8,973,126 -$6,362,830
HARRIS COUNTY 101906 CROSBY ISD -$4,010,282 -$5,389,851 -$3,951,279
HARRIS COUNTY 101907 CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD -$115,512,593 -$99,266,055 -$66,075,510
HARRIS COUNTY 101908 DEER PARK ISD -$15,428,617 -$13,860,680 -$13,500,899
HARRIS COUNTY 101910 GALENA PARK ISD -$18,883,152 -$23,364,352 -$13,523,020
HARRIS COUNTY 101911 GOOSE CREEK ISD -$28,268,170 -$23,539,699 -$32,655,938
HARRIS COUNTY 101912 HOUSTON ISD -$348,155,369 -$202,786,293 -$321,265,092
HARRIS COUNTY 101925 HUFFMAN ISD -$2,453,125 -$3,046,573 -$2,120,017
HARRIS COUNTY 101913 HUMBLE ISD -$30,243,805 -$37,334,844 -$23,630,405

9 1/21/2011
31
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
HARRIS COUNTY 101914 KATY ISD -$62,736,066 -$62,274,283 -$49,034,973
HARRIS COUNTY 101915 KLEIN ISD -$41,434,489 -$44,798,874 -$28,465,453
HARRIS COUNTY 101916 LA PORTE ISD -$8,764,403 -$8,701,855 -$7,923,249
HARRIS COUNTY 101909 NORTH FOREST ISD -$5,200,537 -$6,498,527 -$3,930,626
HARRIS COUNTY 101917 PASADENA ISD -$31,980,226 -$52,771,470 -$32,753,595
HARRIS COUNTY 101924 SHELDON ISD -$14,535,704 -$8,828,076 -$15,168,655
HARRIS COUNTY 101920 SPRING BRANCH ISD -$45,636,480 -$34,527,296 -$40,613,634
HARRIS COUNTY 101919 SPRING ISD -$26,672,046 -$36,799,699 -$23,616,964
HARRIS COUNTY 101921 TOMBALL ISD -$16,127,438 -$11,563,034 -$20,797,115
HARRISON COUNTY 102906 ELYSIAN FIELDS ISD -$2,008,699 -$1,280,918 -$1,885,775
HARRISON COUNTY 102904 HALLSVILLE ISD -$7,790,255 -$5,137,514 -$6,995,544
HARRISON COUNTY 102905 HARLETON ISD -$557,663 -$923,076 -$933,740
HARRISON COUNTY 102901 KARNACK ISD -$262,012 -$263,460 -$242,518
HARRISON COUNTY 102902 MARSHALL ISD -$8,670,890 -$5,465,185 -$5,884,657
HARRISON COUNTY 102903 WASKOM ISD -$1,468,322 -$1,022,718 -$1,287,701
HARTLEY COUNTY 103901 CHANNING ISD -$298,977 -$266,250 -$269,108
HARTLEY COUNTY 103902 HARTLEY ISD -$405,379 -$338,054 -$304,621
HASKELL COUNTY 104901 HASKELL CISD -$500,844 -$931,363 -$519,968
HASKELL COUNTY 104907 PAINT CREEK ISD -$122,735 -$260,175 -$145,988
HASKELL COUNTY 104903 RULE ISD -$106,270 -$210,651 -$117,756
HAYS COUNTY 105904 DRIPPING SPRINGS ISD -$6,158,659 -$4,794,032 -$5,457,507
HAYS COUNTY 105906 HAYS CONS ISD -$11,636,453 -$17,842,245 -$24,496,297
HAYS COUNTY 105902 SAN MARCOS CONS ISD -$10,593,207 -$7,907,512 -$11,081,387
HAYS COUNTY 105905 WIMBERLEY ISD -$3,420,863 -$2,270,794 -$3,154,723
HEMPHILL COUNTY 106901 CANADIAN ISD -$1,518,691 -$433,266 -$1,438,112
HENDERSON COUNTY 107901 ATHENS ISD -$3,537,048 -$3,379,721 -$2,688,658
HENDERSON COUNTY 107902 BROWNSBORO ISD -$2,087,492 -$2,775,970 -$2,072,946
HENDERSON COUNTY 107904 CROSS ROADS ISD -$1,035,151 -$751,787 -$788,786
HENDERSON COUNTY 107905 EUSTACE ISD -$1,595,060 -$1,452,265 -$1,243,673
HENDERSON COUNTY 107910 LAPOYNOR ISD -$1,162,262 -$679,791 -$1,079,214
HENDERSON COUNTY 107906 MALAKOFF ISD -$2,493,969 -$1,558,494 -$2,348,658
HENDERSON COUNTY 107908 MURCHISON ISD -$129,779 -$192,477 -$192,788
HENDERSON COUNTY 107907 TRINIDAD ISD -$124,706 -$212,782 -$181,778
HIDALGO COUNTY 108902 DONNA ISD -$3,053,448 -$17,875,373 -$10,145,853
HIDALGO COUNTY 108903 EDCOUCH-ELSA ISD -$802,378 -$5,712,139 -$3,433,227
HIDALGO COUNTY 108904 EDINBURG CISD -$18,095,803 -$34,708,045 -$22,065,495
HIDALGO COUNTY 108905 HIDALGO ISD -$1,339,785 -$4,083,901 -$2,537,332
HIDALGO COUNTY 108912 LA JOYA ISD -$7,077,904 -$30,038,110 -$18,460,831
HIDALGO COUNTY 108914 LA VILLA ISD -$291,424 -$720,197 -$463,262
HIDALGO COUNTY 108906 MCALLEN ISD -$19,582,317 -$25,299,986 -$16,172,087
HIDALGO COUNTY 108907 MERCEDES ISD -$1,423,541 -$5,757,154 -$3,575,921
HIDALGO COUNTY 108908 MISSION CONS ISD -$5,074,941 -$16,277,735 -$10,025,490
HIDALGO COUNTY 108915 MONTE ALTO ISD -$230,958 -$1,123,864 -$792,785
HIDALGO COUNTY 108909 PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD -$11,024,574 -$33,176,210 -$20,483,946
HIDALGO COUNTY 108910 PROGRESO ISD -$428,882 -$2,575,153 -$1,610,427
HIDALGO COUNTY 108911 SHARYLAND ISD -$7,546,880 -$10,565,978 -$8,769,361

10 1/21/2011
32
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
HIDALGO COUNTY 108916 VALLEY VIEW ISD -$1,422,606 -$5,349,736 -$3,969,010
HIDALGO COUNTY 108913 WESLACO ISD -$5,676,951 -$18,349,881 -$10,813,600
HILL COUNTY 109901 ABBOTT ISD -$151,380 -$363,344 -$213,085
HILL COUNTY 109912 AQUILLA ISD -$169,916 -$334,215 -$196,935
HILL COUNTY 109913 BLUM ISD -$488,934 -$514,656 -$401,000
HILL COUNTY 109902 BYNUM ISD -$172,102 -$337,220 -$188,740
HILL COUNTY 109903 COVINGTON ISD -$332,538 -$348,983 -$202,983
HILL COUNTY 109904 HILLSBORO ISD -$1,682,256 -$2,128,450 -$1,218,681
HILL COUNTY 109905 HUBBARD ISD -$223,305 -$539,911 -$889,685
HILL COUNTY 109907 ITASCA ISD -$663,511 -$985,007 -$553,929
HILL COUNTY 109908 MALONE ISD -$112,881 -$122,581 -$148,534
HILL COUNTY 109910 MOUNT CALM ISD -$70,358 -$206,832 -$129,436
HILL COUNTY 109914 PENELOPE ISD -$65,408 -$278,507 -$158,397
HILL COUNTY 109911 WHITNEY ISD -$1,681,687 -$1,567,198 -$1,056,937
HOCKLEY COUNTY 110901 ANTON ISD -$348,169 -$301,867 -$177,574
HOCKLEY COUNTY 110902 LEVELLAND ISD -$4,808,172 -$3,497,877 -$5,203,008
HOCKLEY COUNTY 110905 ROPES ISD -$281,707 -$415,307 -$231,990
HOCKLEY COUNTY 110906 SMYER ISD -$306,848 -$498,699 -$429,593
HOCKLEY COUNTY 110907 SUNDOWN ISD -$3,936,403 -$1,656,041 -$3,875,360
HOCKLEY COUNTY 110908 WHITHARRAL ISD -$231,786 -$289,313 -$404,492
HOOD COUNTY 111901 GRANBURY ISD -$9,126,225 -$7,652,265 -$8,263,112
HOOD COUNTY 111902 LIPAN ISD -$346,915 -$357,365 -$280,625
HOOD COUNTY 111903 TOLAR ISD -$810,494 -$712,604 -$891,358
HOPKINS COUNTY 112908 COMO-PICKTON CISD -$497,810 -$959,765 -$1,361,155
HOPKINS COUNTY 112905 CUMBY ISD -$204,406 -$567,824 -$550,516
HOPKINS COUNTY 112907 MILLER GROVE ISD -$148,909 -$349,489 -$190,806
HOPKINS COUNTY 112906 NORTH HOPKINS ISD -$248,055 -$556,239 -$482,086
HOPKINS COUNTY 112909 SALTILLO ISD -$128,614 -$358,762 -$410,394
HOPKINS COUNTY 112910 SULPHUR BLUFF ISD -$185,423 -$313,016 -$257,116
HOPKINS COUNTY 112901 SULPHUR SPRINGS ISD -$3,560,581 -$3,970,619 -$3,689,575
HOUSTON COUNTY 113901 CROCKETT ISD -$1,300,754 -$1,445,453 -$964,042
HOUSTON COUNTY 113902 GRAPELAND ISD -$842,292 -$668,840 -$912,585
HOUSTON COUNTY 113906 KENNARD ISD -$576,970 -$577,393 -$1,046,195
HOUSTON COUNTY 113905 LATEXO ISD -$455,421 -$529,619 -$475,267
HOUSTON COUNTY 113903 LOVELADY ISD -$725,826 -$744,879 -$799,385
HOWARD COUNTY 114901 BIG SPRING ISD -$3,414,949 -$3,935,999 -$5,187,376
HOWARD COUNTY 114902 COAHOMA ISD -$1,122,722 -$987,727 -$924,665
HOWARD COUNTY 114904 FORSAN ISD -$1,153,933 -$914,484 -$1,084,089
HUDSPETH COUNTY 115903 DELL CITY ISD -$180,627 -$133,289 -$81,367
HUDSPETH COUNTY 115901 FT HANCOCK ISD -$485,551 -$740,032 -$1,005,772
HUDSPETH COUNTY 115902 SIERRA BLANCA ISD -$237,182 -$258,429 -$195,759
HUNT COUNTY 116915 BLAND ISD -$376,920 -$681,326 -$550,297
HUNT COUNTY 116916 BOLES ISD -$52,171 -$706,281 -$399,677
HUNT COUNTY 116901 CADDO MILLS ISD -$1,101,655 -$1,561,351 -$1,354,584
HUNT COUNTY 116910 CAMPBELL ISD -$232,580 -$502,776 -$433,179
HUNT COUNTY 116902 CELESTE ISD -$237,156 -$607,908 -$390,865

11 1/21/2011
33
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
HUNT COUNTY 116903 COMMERCE ISD -$1,470,334 -$1,523,248 -$1,277,469
HUNT COUNTY 116905 GREENVILLE ISD -$4,728,084 -$4,425,101 -$2,978,116
HUNT COUNTY 116906 LONE OAK ISD -$766,137 -$1,067,385 -$1,043,456
HUNT COUNTY 116908 QUINLAN ISD -$2,161,304 -$2,455,947 -$1,893,940
HUNT COUNTY 116909 WOLFE CITY ISD -$296,878 -$752,695 -$534,772
HUTCHINSON COUNTY 117901 BORGER ISD -$1,731,579 -$2,607,692 -$1,632,653
HUTCHINSON COUNTY 117904 PLEMONS-STINNETT-PHILLIPS CONS ISD
-$1,548,954 -$1,054,587 -$1,473,084
HUTCHINSON COUNTY 117903 SANFORD ISD -$501,008 -$930,732 -$790,180
HUTCHINSON COUNTY 117907 SPRING CREEK ISD -$169,058 -$135,048 -$165,154
IRION COUNTY 118902 IRION CO ISD -$1,020,613 -$600,675 -$979,181
JACK COUNTY 119901 BRYSON ISD -$149,051 -$236,686 -$129,027
JACK COUNTY 119902 JACKSBORO ISD -$2,153,301 -$1,474,320 -$2,831,630
JACK COUNTY 119903 PERRIN-WHITT CONS ISD -$205,313 -$479,985 -$165,835
JACKSON COUNTY 120901 EDNA ISD -$1,365,256 -$1,776,170 -$2,781,842
JACKSON COUNTY 120902 GANADO ISD -$476,717 -$752,583 -$485,641
JACKSON COUNTY 120905 INDUSTRIAL ISD -$1,713,391 -$1,357,920 -$1,684,977
JASPER COUNTY 121902 BROOKELAND ISD -$598,993 -$591,113 -$373,409
JASPER COUNTY 121903 BUNA ISD -$829,891 -$1,399,222 -$1,074,940
JASPER COUNTY 121906 EVADALE ISD -$135,146 -$572,803 -$84,862
JASPER COUNTY 121904 JASPER ISD -$2,221,270 -$2,818,113 -$1,687,869
JASPER COUNTY 121905 KIRBYVILLE CISD -$558,339 -$1,429,582 -$899,209
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY 122901 FT DAVIS ISD -$560,234 -$536,770 -$942,928
JEFF DAVIS COUNTY 122902 VALENTINE ISD -$114,696 -$186,367 -$244,887
JEFFERSON COUNTY 123910 BEAUMONT ISD -$27,850,632 -$21,005,485 -$26,720,342
JEFFERSON COUNTY 123914 HAMSHIRE-FANNETT ISD -$2,082,412 -$1,934,745 -$1,669,907
JEFFERSON COUNTY 123905 NEDERLAND ISD -$5,793,562 -$4,979,444 -$3,258,873
JEFFERSON COUNTY 123907 PORT ARTHUR ISD -$12,922,863 -$9,646,438 -$11,423,963
JEFFERSON COUNTY 123908 PORT NECHES-GROVES ISD -$4,788,487 -$4,521,351 -$4,168,661
JEFFERSON COUNTY 123913 SABINE PASS ISD -$608,022 -$610,722 -$571,682
JIM HOGG COUNTY 124901 JIM HOGG COUNTY ISD -$1,363,613 -$1,385,855 -$1,556,884
JIM WELLS COUNTY 125901 ALICE ISD -$3,391,197 -$4,890,892 -$2,916,842
JIM WELLS COUNTY 125902 BEN BOLT-PALITO BLANCO CISD -$228,121 -$774,163 -$823,195
JIM WELLS COUNTY 125906 LA GLORIA ISD -$140,460 -$166,512 -$127,483
JIM WELLS COUNTY 125903 ORANGE GROVE ISD -$620,188 -$1,983,612 -$1,114,843
JIM WELLS COUNTY 125905 PREMONT ISD -$438,014 -$667,413 -$405,451
JOHNSON COUNTY 126901 ALVARADO ISD -$5,046,825 -$3,497,122 -$2,654,518
JOHNSON COUNTY 126902 BURLESON ISD -$11,405,470 -$9,768,814 -$7,233,605
JOHNSON COUNTY 126903 CLEBURNE ISD -$10,811,173 -$7,166,512 -$8,144,707
JOHNSON COUNTY 126911 GODLEY ISD -$4,640,044 -$2,315,532 -$5,518,442
JOHNSON COUNTY 126904 GRANDVIEW ISD -$1,194,353 -$1,293,092 -$1,522,903
JOHNSON COUNTY 126905 JOSHUA ISD -$5,192,122 -$5,047,032 -$3,179,389
JOHNSON COUNTY 126906 KEENE ISD -$645,724 -$1,094,485 -$620,702
JOHNSON COUNTY 126907 RIO VISTA ISD -$977,575 -$1,048,218 -$974,305
JOHNSON COUNTY 126908 VENUS ISD -$1,390,023 -$2,253,747 -$1,337,718
JONES COUNTY 127901 ANSON ISD -$314,312 -$869,920 -$534,440
JONES COUNTY 127903 HAMLIN ISD -$439,743 -$640,224 -$369,172

12 1/21/2011
34
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
JONES COUNTY 127904 HAWLEY ISD -$293,354 -$861,959 -$531,993
JONES COUNTY 127905 LUEDERS-AVOCA ISD -$190,482 -$223,230 -$224,431
JONES COUNTY 127906 STAMFORD ISD -$253,967 -$775,743 -$435,749
KARNES COUNTY 128904 FALLS CITY ISD -$213,080 -$381,358 -$258,300
KARNES COUNTY 128901 KARNES CITY ISD -$681,717 -$1,151,428 -$1,018,074
KARNES COUNTY 128902 KENEDY ISD -$509,303 -$795,432 -$467,848
KARNES COUNTY 128903 RUNGE ISD -$244,363 -$390,908 -$384,556
KAUFMAN COUNTY 129901 CRANDALL ISD -$1,661,155 -$2,919,589 -$2,076,878
KAUFMAN COUNTY 129902 FORNEY ISD -$7,326,593 -$8,824,856 -$9,432,731
KAUFMAN COUNTY 129903 KAUFMAN ISD -$2,003,639 -$3,688,061 -$2,274,802
KAUFMAN COUNTY 129904 KEMP ISD -$1,045,976 -$1,560,377 -$1,062,033
KAUFMAN COUNTY 129905 MABANK ISD -$3,271,134 -$3,264,571 -$2,669,122
KAUFMAN COUNTY 129910 SCURRY-ROSSER ISD -$509,624 -$968,396 -$612,503
KAUFMAN COUNTY 129906 TERRELL ISD -$4,500,770 -$4,079,831 -$2,603,944
KENDALL COUNTY 130901 BOERNE ISD -$9,475,897 -$7,003,718 -$8,679,240
KENDALL COUNTY 130902 COMFORT ISD -$1,942,493 -$1,441,978 -$2,036,465
KENEDY COUNTY 131001 KENEDY COUNTY WIDE CSD -$222,847 -$256,314 -$219,847
KENT COUNTY 132902 JAYTON-GIRARD ISD -$909,008 -$494,392 -$889,532
KERR COUNTY 133901 CENTER POINT ISD -$676,023 -$836,254 -$859,415
KERR COUNTY 133905 DIVIDE ISD -$115,799 -$70,008 -$115,799
KERR COUNTY 133902 HUNT ISD -$523,445 -$287,032 -$517,195
KERR COUNTY 133904 INGRAM ISD -$1,347,541 -$1,109,773 -$772,079
KERR COUNTY 133903 KERRVILLE ISD -$6,868,550 -$5,646,041 -$8,306,255
KIMBLE COUNTY 134901 JUNCTION ISD -$948,204 -$796,479 -$845,383
KING COUNTY 135001 GUTHRIE CSD -$784,971 -$515,811 -$1,040,034
KINNEY COUNTY 136901 BRACKETT ISD -$515,561 -$848,856 -$918,442
KLEBERG COUNTY 137901 KINGSVILLE ISD -$2,251,624 -$3,778,690 -$2,894,542
KLEBERG COUNTY 137902 RICARDO ISD -$420,506 -$761,756 -$582,680
KLEBERG COUNTY 137903 RIVIERA ISD -$1,085,681 -$691,836 -$677,431
KLEBERG COUNTY 137904 SANTA GERTRUDIS ISD -$579,025 -$710,485 -$1,858,798
KNOX COUNTY 138904 BENJAMIN ISD -$93,498 -$137,955 -$80,627
KNOX COUNTY 138902 KNOX CITY-O'BRIEN ISD -$232,039 -$398,994 -$225,341
KNOX COUNTY 138903 MUNDAY ISD -$149,334 -$461,724 -$260,025
LA SALLE COUNTY 142901 COTULLA ISD -$1,281,804 -$1,582,400 -$1,289,701
LAMAR COUNTY 139905 CHISUM ISD -$803,409 -$1,013,346 -$695,170
LAMAR COUNTY 139911 NORTH LAMAR ISD -$2,669,796 -$2,887,743 -$2,001,275
LAMAR COUNTY 139909 PARIS ISD -$2,208,587 -$3,691,058 -$2,125,662
LAMAR COUNTY 139912 PRAIRILAND ISD -$498,856 -$1,250,820 -$818,113
LAMAR COUNTY 139908 ROXTON ISD -$189,406 -$241,216 -$165,175
LAMB COUNTY 140901 AMHERST ISD -$153,161 -$214,859 -$132,680
LAMB COUNTY 140904 LITTLEFIELD ISD -$717,809 -$1,463,752 -$1,024,550
LAMB COUNTY 140905 OLTON ISD -$417,114 -$763,161 -$487,286
LAMB COUNTY 140907 SPRINGLAKE-EARTH ISD -$255,718 -$531,146 -$318,874
LAMB COUNTY 140908 SUDAN ISD -$1,119,161 -$687,967 -$1,226,714
LAMPASAS COUNTY 141901 LAMPASAS ISD -$2,991,248 -$3,463,326 -$3,487,885
LAMPASAS COUNTY 141902 LOMETA ISD -$253,703 -$401,791 -$240,493

13 1/21/2011
35
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
LAVACA COUNTY 143906 EZZELL ISD -$30,086 -$101,809 -$25,586
LAVACA COUNTY 143901 HALLETTSVILLE ISD -$1,965,002 -$1,250,515 -$1,819,130
LAVACA COUNTY 143902 MOULTON ISD -$255,542 -$377,657 -$375,894
LAVACA COUNTY 143903 SHINER ISD -$621,844 -$659,009 -$538,591
LAVACA COUNTY 143905 SWEET HOME ISD -$232,370 -$166,465 -$190,332
LAVACA COUNTY 143904 VYSEHRAD ISD -$194,335 -$150,246 -$336,411
LEE COUNTY 144903 DIME BOX ISD -$318,654 -$282,175 -$283,976
LEE COUNTY 144901 GIDDINGS ISD -$2,302,399 -$2,027,700 -$2,016,216
LEE COUNTY 144902 LEXINGTON ISD -$1,023,311 -$1,072,709 -$1,144,728
LEON COUNTY 145901 BUFFALO ISD -$1,534,544 -$1,159,167 -$2,115,560
LEON COUNTY 145902 CENTERVILLE ISD -$872,890 -$908,572 -$688,617
LEON COUNTY 145911 LEON ISD -$3,702,931 -$1,383,762 -$3,835,705
LEON COUNTY 145906 NORMANGEE ISD -$630,833 -$631,078 -$510,011
LEON COUNTY 145907 OAKWOOD ISD -$462,527 -$326,233 -$424,292
LIBERTY COUNTY 146901 CLEVELAND ISD -$2,198,884 -$3,924,329 -$3,007,581
LIBERTY COUNTY 146902 DAYTON ISD -$4,243,267 -$4,776,667 -$3,247,876
LIBERTY COUNTY 146903 DEVERS ISD -$691,697 -$308,663 -$682,697
LIBERTY COUNTY 146904 HARDIN ISD -$753,756 -$1,377,203 -$1,536,437
LIBERTY COUNTY 146905 HULL-DAISETTA ISD -$715,949 -$702,083 -$789,138
LIBERTY COUNTY 146906 LIBERTY ISD -$2,409,043 -$2,269,773 -$2,127,942
LIBERTY COUNTY 146907 TARKINGTON ISD -$1,166,871 -$1,922,612 -$1,200,549
LIMESTONE COUNTY 147901 COOLIDGE ISD -$105,204 -$365,786 -$226,975
LIMESTONE COUNTY 147902 GROESBECK ISD -$4,343,816 -$2,269,987 -$4,168,833
LIMESTONE COUNTY 147903 MEXIA ISD -$1,290,801 -$2,240,659 -$1,388,055
LIPSCOMB COUNTY 148901 BOOKER ISD -$825,359 -$565,918 -$682,441
LIPSCOMB COUNTY 148905 DARROUZETT ISD -$660,149 -$350,089 -$740,931
LIPSCOMB COUNTY 148902 FOLLETT ISD -$587,462 -$318,239 -$567,062
LIPSCOMB COUNTY 148903 HIGGINS ISD -$361,913 -$187,563 -$350,827
LIVE OAK COUNTY 149901 GEORGE WEST ISD -$1,636,359 -$1,294,817 -$1,255,069
LIVE OAK COUNTY 149902 THREE RIVERS ISD -$1,810,249 -$939,872 -$1,718,605
LLANO COUNTY 150901 LLANO ISD -$2,966,624 -$2,480,734 -$2,768,377
LUBBOCK COUNTY 152907 FRENSHIP ISD -$7,362,860 -$7,698,586 -$8,702,436
LUBBOCK COUNTY 152910 IDALOU ISD -$645,216 -$1,121,032 -$821,571
LUBBOCK COUNTY 152901 LUBBOCK ISD -$27,583,033 -$26,346,562 -$16,393,593
LUBBOCK COUNTY 152906 LUBBOCK-COOPER ISD -$4,407,122 -$4,477,365 -$6,128,410
LUBBOCK COUNTY 152902 NEW DEAL ISD -$575,790 -$926,390 -$558,818
LUBBOCK COUNTY 152908 ROOSEVELT ISD -$646,039 -$1,261,272 -$806,550
LUBBOCK COUNTY 152909 SHALLOWATER ISD -$687,327 -$1,693,352 -$1,222,116
LUBBOCK COUNTY 152903 SLATON ISD -$817,786 -$1,439,423 -$809,877
LYNN COUNTY 153905 NEW HOME ISD -$157,259 -$227,155 -$151,377
LYNN COUNTY 153903 O'DONNELL ISD -$324,121 -$510,120 -$682,360
LYNN COUNTY 153904 TAHOKA ISD -$349,436 -$762,712 -$473,604
LYNN COUNTY 153907 WILSON ISD -$156,700 -$206,291 -$114,447
MADISON COUNTY 154901 MADISONVILLE CONS ISD -$1,403,749 -$2,403,684 -$1,794,121
MADISON COUNTY 154903 NORTH ZULCH ISD -$359,841 -$457,422 -$343,862
MARION COUNTY 155901 JEFFERSON ISD -$1,823,009 -$1,441,598 -$1,866,912

14 1/21/2011
36
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
MARTIN COUNTY 156905 GRADY ISD -$779,995 -$379,718 -$755,574
MARTIN COUNTY 156902 STANTON ISD -$2,220,929 -$1,169,394 -$2,134,233
MASON COUNTY 157901 MASON ISD -$826,705 -$1,014,960 -$885,033
MATAGORDA COUNTY 158901 BAY CITY ISD -$3,287,506 -$4,142,641 -$3,495,536
MATAGORDA COUNTY 158904 MATAGORDA ISD -$360,189 -$201,697 -$357,189
MATAGORDA COUNTY 158905 PALACIOS ISD -$4,515,277 -$2,183,004 -$4,355,609
MATAGORDA COUNTY 158902 TIDEHAVEN ISD -$1,590,186 -$1,182,129 -$1,502,632
MATAGORDA COUNTY 158906 VAN VLECK ISD -$1,862,693 -$1,282,902 -$1,754,594
MAVERICK COUNTY 159901 EAGLE PASS ISD -$5,375,429 -$14,851,285 -$8,959,427
MCCULLOCH COUNTY 160901 BRADY ISD -$1,004,686 -$1,481,372 -$1,440,078
MCCULLOCH COUNTY 160905 LOHN ISD -$58,396 -$192,968 -$129,166
MCCULLOCH COUNTY 160904 ROCHELLE ISD -$140,622 -$322,865 -$220,632
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161918 AXTELL ISD -$301,427 -$1,049,038 -$584,146
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161923 BOSQUEVILLE ISD -$400,972 -$730,693 -$478,200
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161919 BRUCEVILLE-EDDY ISD -$435,706 -$1,073,223 -$693,750
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161920 CHINA SPRING ISD -$1,684,157 -$2,337,931 -$2,496,668
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161921 CONNALLY ISD -$1,682,775 -$2,392,687 -$1,471,023
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161901 CRAWFORD ISD -$429,976 -$629,260 -$385,979
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161925 GHOLSON ISD -$108,392 -$208,357 -$259,021
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161924 HALLSBURG ISD -$134,661 -$125,887 -$122,061
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161906 LA VEGA ISD -$1,919,549 -$3,058,829 -$2,070,341
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161907 LORENA ISD -$1,151,376 -$1,512,700 -$1,078,102
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161908 MART ISD -$267,093 -$711,648 -$851,897
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161909 MCGREGOR ISD -$834,735 -$1,525,758 -$1,793,442
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161903 MIDWAY ISD -$10,678,864 -$7,532,769 -$12,851,922
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161910 MOODY ISD -$435,700 -$878,583 -$1,290,597
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161912 RIESEL ISD -$393,303 -$665,283 -$415,022
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161922 ROBINSON ISD -$1,427,529 -$2,269,741 -$1,496,187
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161914 WACO ISD -$11,763,499 -$15,055,130 -$11,108,006
MCLENNAN COUNTY 161916 WEST ISD -$985,734 -$1,614,329 -$1,078,928
MCMULLEN COUNTY 162904 MCMULLEN COUNTY ISD -$870,860 -$453,106 -$847,560
MEDINA COUNTY 163902 D' HANIS ISD -$280,908 -$448,695 -$316,476
MEDINA COUNTY 163901 DEVINE ISD -$956,168 -$2,131,042 -$1,550,342
MEDINA COUNTY 163904 HONDO ISD -$1,348,177 -$2,218,500 -$1,367,736
MEDINA COUNTY 163908 MEDINA VALLEY ISD -$2,994,015 -$3,766,478 -$2,832,716
MEDINA COUNTY 163903 NATALIA ISD -$442,994 -$1,217,593 -$680,663
MENARD COUNTY 164901 MENARD ISD -$412,600 -$436,239 -$318,671
MIDLAND COUNTY 165902 GREENWOOD ISD -$2,147,123 -$1,882,767 -$2,361,196
MIDLAND COUNTY 165901 MIDLAND ISD -$32,734,998 -$20,910,435 -$23,848,184
MILAM COUNTY 166907 BUCKHOLTS ISD -$85,024 -$198,306 -$126,175
MILAM COUNTY 166901 CAMERON ISD -$882,745 -$1,693,638 -$1,275,280
MILAM COUNTY 166902 GAUSE ISD -$242,216 -$197,902 -$256,441
MILAM COUNTY 166903 MILANO ISD -$241,601 -$528,219 -$324,103
MILAM COUNTY 166904 ROCKDALE ISD -$1,037,243 -$1,691,216 -$750,244
MILAM COUNTY 166905 THORNDALE ISD -$350,460 -$717,573 -$526,244
MILLS COUNTY 167901 GOLDTHWAITE ISD -$445,956 -$653,920 -$610,117

15 1/21/2011
37
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
MILLS COUNTY 167902 MULLIN ISD -$161,649 -$208,166 -$183,401
MILLS COUNTY 167904 PRIDDY ISD -$56,647 -$181,961 -$189,806
MILLS COUNTY 167903 STAR ISD -$74,162 -$108,745 -$54,332
MITCHELL COUNTY 168901 COLORADO ISD -$965,462 -$1,389,263 -$891,494
MITCHELL COUNTY 168902 LORAINE ISD -$134,042 -$223,742 -$103,753
MITCHELL COUNTY 168903 WESTBROOK ISD -$1,291,896 -$880,402 -$2,091,067
MONTAGUE COUNTY 169901 BOWIE ISD -$1,815,200 -$1,742,797 -$2,126,132
MONTAGUE COUNTY 169910 FORESTBURG ISD -$313,866 -$260,016 -$241,714
MONTAGUE COUNTY 169906 GOLD BURG ISD -$200,143 -$198,524 -$174,727
MONTAGUE COUNTY 169908 MONTAGUE ISD -$93,100 -$140,187 -$172,455
MONTAGUE COUNTY 169902 NOCONA ISD -$557,153 -$900,256 -$690,155
MONTAGUE COUNTY 169909 PRAIRIE VALLEY ISD -$427,631 -$249,794 -$421,080
MONTAGUE COUNTY 169911 SAINT JO ISD -$573,972 -$436,682 -$508,325
MONTGOMERY COUNTY 170902 CONROE ISD -$66,871,201 -$53,283,596 -$50,382,968
MONTGOMERY COUNTY 170906 MAGNOLIA ISD -$10,887,516 -$12,733,861 -$12,160,308
MONTGOMERY COUNTY 170903 MONTGOMERY ISD -$8,599,275 -$7,623,274 -$7,143,333
MONTGOMERY COUNTY 170908 NEW CANEY ISD -$6,444,953 -$10,415,105 -$6,194,314
MONTGOMERY COUNTY 170907 SPLENDORA ISD -$1,127,086 -$3,455,097 -$2,122,733
MONTGOMERY COUNTY 170904 WILLIS ISD -$6,418,097 -$6,636,340 -$6,048,894
MOORE COUNTY 171901 DUMAS ISD -$7,238,109 -$5,020,270 -$6,448,809
MOORE COUNTY 171902 SUNRAY ISD -$1,048,078 -$745,464 -$959,355
MORRIS COUNTY 172902 DAINGERFIELD-LONE STAR ISD -$1,812,833 -$1,470,851 -$1,556,959
MORRIS COUNTY 172905 PEWITT ISD -$772,964 -$1,075,206 -$869,458
MOTLEY COUNTY 173901 MOTLEY COUNTY ISD -$235,255 -$306,133 -$192,091
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174908 CENTRAL HEIGHTS ISD -$373,285 -$986,684 -$699,270
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174901 CHIRENO ISD -$181,588 -$410,721 -$252,397
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174902 CUSHING ISD -$1,524,970 -$812,723 -$1,652,878
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174911 DOUGLASS ISD -$662,175 -$526,711 -$1,019,267
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174910 ETOILE ISD -$141,062 -$157,838 -$86,397
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174903 GARRISON ISD -$969,813 -$966,883 -$1,838,159
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174909 MARTINSVILLE ISD -$325,963 -$405,000 -$251,692
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174904 NACOGDOCHES ISD -$5,882,305 -$6,169,461 -$3,544,318
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY 174906 WODEN ISD -$478,321 -$912,226 -$678,457
NAVARRO COUNTY 175902 BLOOMING GROVE ISD -$394,746 -$904,164 -$553,655
NAVARRO COUNTY 175903 CORSICANA ISD -$4,259,743 -$5,414,137 -$3,966,962
NAVARRO COUNTY 175904 DAWSON ISD -$300,149 -$505,565 -$308,812
NAVARRO COUNTY 175905 FROST ISD -$208,763 -$468,779 -$309,881
NAVARRO COUNTY 175907 KERENS ISD -$623,352 -$826,794 -$937,245
NAVARRO COUNTY 175910 MILDRED ISD -$1,266,251 -$969,110 -$1,616,575
NAVARRO COUNTY 175911 RICE ISD -$258,996 -$937,245 -$706,199
NEWTON COUNTY 176901 BURKEVILLE ISD -$529,631 -$402,537 -$276,950
NEWTON COUNTY 176903 DEWEYVILLE ISD -$1,163,956 -$803,583 -$964,368
NEWTON COUNTY 176902 NEWTON ISD -$1,044,688 -$1,362,314 -$1,106,720
NOLAN COUNTY 177903 BLACKWELL CONS ISD -$867,850 -$412,210 -$848,426
NOLAN COUNTY 177905 HIGHLAND ISD -$23,176 -$414,757 $0
NOLAN COUNTY 177901 ROSCOE ISD -$287,450 -$506,038 -$227,759

16 1/21/2011
38
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
NOLAN COUNTY 177902 SWEETWATER ISD -$1,760,443 -$2,333,630 -$1,807,937
NUECES COUNTY 178901 AGUA DULCE ISD -$396,245 -$450,735 -$255,044
NUECES COUNTY 178913 BANQUETE ISD -$824,445 -$942,426 -$665,699
NUECES COUNTY 178902 BISHOP CONS ISD -$1,592,287 -$1,314,546 -$1,096,898
NUECES COUNTY 178903 CALALLEN ISD -$3,654,292 -$3,563,266 -$2,363,916
NUECES COUNTY 178904 CORPUS CHRISTI ISD -$37,082,050 -$38,136,140 -$21,979,262
NUECES COUNTY 178905 DRISCOLL ISD -$431,658 -$589,823 -$2,053,222
NUECES COUNTY 178914 FLOUR BLUFF ISD -$7,366,647 -$5,452,552 -$5,511,027
NUECES COUNTY 178906 LONDON ISD -$729,666 -$564,818 -$1,449,983
NUECES COUNTY 178908 PORT ARANSAS ISD -$1,590,945 -$891,184 -$1,523,089
NUECES COUNTY 178909 ROBSTOWN ISD -$1,061,089 -$3,248,980 -$2,002,966
NUECES COUNTY 178912 TULOSO-MIDWAY ISD -$4,759,389 -$3,458,130 -$2,466,858
NUECES COUNTY 178915 WEST OSO ISD -$1,656,689 -$2,308,223 -$1,421,576
OCHILTREE COUNTY 179901 PERRYTON ISD -$2,896,622 -$2,328,975 -$1,975,467
OLDHAM COUNTY 180903 ADRIAN ISD -$142,867 -$225,342 -$127,884
OLDHAM COUNTY 180902 VEGA ISD -$346,185 -$441,855 -$441,763
OLDHAM COUNTY 180904 WILDORADO ISD -$121,928 -$109,956 -$100,659
ORANGE COUNTY 181901 BRIDGE CITY ISD -$1,915,640 -$2,560,271 -$1,813,646
ORANGE COUNTY 181908 LITTLE CYPRESS-MAURICEVILLE CISD -$2,994,441 -$3,384,243 -$2,110,677
ORANGE COUNTY 181905 ORANGEFIELD ISD -$1,237,100 -$1,755,705 -$1,097,972
ORANGE COUNTY 181907 VIDOR ISD -$2,562,806 -$5,164,052 -$3,010,388
ORANGE COUNTY 181906 WEST ORANGE-COVE CONS ISD -$1,545,539 -$2,651,441 -$1,073,792
PALO PINTO COUNTY 182901 GORDON ISD -$419,660 -$307,705 -$496,819
PALO PINTO COUNTY 182902 GRAFORD ISD -$444,142 -$442,949 -$411,613
PALO PINTO COUNTY 182903 MINERAL WELLS ISD -$2,450,835 -$3,518,619 -$2,644,522
PALO PINTO COUNTY 182906 PALO PINTO ISD -$215,231 -$148,729 -$211,481
PALO PINTO COUNTY 182904 SANTO ISD -$806,414 -$564,654 -$378,762
PALO PINTO COUNTY 182905 STRAWN ISD -$249,242 -$239,669 -$187,087
PANOLA COUNTY 183901 BECKVILLE ISD -$2,398,763 -$1,013,809 -$2,341,839
PANOLA COUNTY 183902 CARTHAGE ISD -$7,240,326 -$3,205,360 -$6,954,440
PANOLA COUNTY 183904 GARY ISD -$985,504 -$629,615 -$1,203,921
PARKER COUNTY 184907 ALEDO ISD -$6,120,242 -$5,269,707 -$5,206,615
PARKER COUNTY 184909 BROCK ISD -$1,221,014 -$1,010,082 -$1,074,034
PARKER COUNTY 184911 GARNER ISD -$310,106 -$274,612 -$292,387
PARKER COUNTY 184904 MILLSAP ISD -$912,992 -$924,700 -$560,721
PARKER COUNTY 184908 PEASTER ISD -$847,475 -$1,158,728 -$969,959
PARKER COUNTY 184901 POOLVILLE ISD -$556,864 -$680,014 -$684,991
PARKER COUNTY 184902 SPRINGTOWN ISD -$2,696,924 -$3,417,124 -$2,305,221
PARKER COUNTY 184903 WEATHERFORD ISD -$10,892,527 -$7,472,944 -$7,666,252
PARMER COUNTY 185901 BOVINA ISD -$250,121 -$608,184 -$553,267
PARMER COUNTY 185902 FARWELL ISD -$424,724 -$655,562 -$533,515
PARMER COUNTY 185903 FRIONA ISD -$976,494 -$1,438,044 -$2,758,932
PARMER COUNTY 185904 LAZBUDDIE ISD -$200,550 -$244,540 -$274,655
PECOS COUNTY 186901 BUENA VISTA ISD -$323,856 -$272,913 -$307,565
PECOS COUNTY 186902 FT STOCKTON ISD -$5,470,793 -$3,188,592 -$5,218,595
PECOS COUNTY 186903 IRAAN-SHEFFIELD ISD -$2,062,560 -$1,212,079 -$1,976,725

17 1/21/2011
39
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
POLK COUNTY 187901 BIG SANDY ISD -$945,563 -$610,663 -$545,336
POLK COUNTY 187904 CORRIGAN-CAMDEN ISD -$840,058 -$1,125,326 -$675,522
POLK COUNTY 187903 GOODRICH ISD -$303,530 -$322,521 -$258,417
POLK COUNTY 187906 LEGGETT ISD -$394,530 -$260,230 -$269,275
POLK COUNTY 187907 LIVINGSTON ISD -$4,270,226 -$3,987,392 -$4,300,899
POLK COUNTY 187910 ONALASKA ISD -$1,311,119 -$1,112,535 -$1,547,576
POTTER COUNTY 188901 AMARILLO ISD -$23,096,491 -$30,551,218 -$18,408,210
POTTER COUNTY 188904 BUSHLAND ISD -$2,628,352 -$1,717,869 -$2,596,437
POTTER COUNTY 188903 HIGHLAND PARK ISD -$1,501,027 -$1,265,904 -$1,411,167
POTTER COUNTY 188902 RIVER ROAD ISD -$760,357 -$1,473,769 -$933,490
PRESIDIO COUNTY 189901 MARFA ISD -$422,490 -$516,377 -$643,759
PRESIDIO COUNTY 189902 PRESIDIO ISD -$261,374 -$2,079,013 -$3,597,989
RAINS COUNTY 190903 RAINS ISD -$1,565,061 -$1,713,389 -$1,924,829
RANDALL COUNTY 191901 CANYON ISD -$9,398,338 -$8,103,138 -$6,804,665
REAGAN COUNTY 192901 REAGAN COUNTY ISD -$2,675,856 -$1,339,820 -$2,595,800
REAL COUNTY 193902 LEAKEY ISD -$931,381 -$398,425 -$977,731
RED RIVER COUNTY 194902 AVERY ISD -$144,446 -$469,098 -$274,673
RED RIVER COUNTY 194904 CLARKSVILLE ISD -$592,740 -$1,031,822 -$1,333,895
RED RIVER COUNTY 194905 DETROIT ISD -$183,644 -$613,982 -$361,670
RED RIVER COUNTY 194903 RIVERCREST ISD -$560,774 -$953,374 -$1,535,542
REEVES COUNTY 195902 BALMORHEA ISD -$96,072 -$283,657 -$500,059
REEVES COUNTY 195901 PECOS-BARSTOW-TOYAH ISD -$2,904,405 -$2,585,193 -$3,934,424
REFUGIO COUNTY 196901 AUSTWELL-TIVOLI ISD -$961,167 -$337,796 -$942,110
REFUGIO COUNTY 196903 REFUGIO ISD -$1,707,720 -$1,156,992 -$2,005,107
REFUGIO COUNTY 196902 WOODSBORO ISD -$452,475 -$685,707 -$584,660
ROBERTS COUNTY 197902 MIAMI ISD -$865,790 -$410,805 -$843,601
ROBERTSON COUNTY 198901 BREMOND ISD -$1,153,604 -$777,317 -$1,105,693
ROBERTSON COUNTY 198902 CALVERT ISD -$281,185 -$201,515 -$232,794
ROBERTSON COUNTY 198903 FRANKLIN ISD -$6,102,886 -$2,281,382 -$5,978,036
ROBERTSON COUNTY 198905 HEARNE ISD -$1,057,267 -$1,211,788 -$1,057,530
ROBERTSON COUNTY 198906 MUMFORD ISD -$269,918 -$744,800 -$649,930
ROCKWALL COUNTY 199901 ROCKWALL ISD -$18,384,159 -$15,115,191 -$23,865,315
ROCKWALL COUNTY 199902 ROYSE CITY ISD -$3,408,632 -$5,120,606 -$7,148,390
RUNNELS COUNTY 200901 BALLINGER ISD -$734,327 -$1,347,881 -$1,227,491
RUNNELS COUNTY 200902 MILES ISD -$195,641 -$508,127 -$376,710
RUNNELS COUNTY 200906 OLFEN ISD -$14,943 -$121,011 -$109,043
RUNNELS COUNTY 200904 WINTERS ISD -$565,108 -$875,870 -$1,200,280
RUSK COUNTY 201913 CARLISLE ISD -$314,689 -$856,159 -$488,284
RUSK COUNTY 201902 HENDERSON ISD -$3,806,919 -$3,466,815 -$3,313,055
RUSK COUNTY 201903 LANEVILLE ISD -$251,564 -$250,995 -$181,839
RUSK COUNTY 201904 LEVERETTS CHAPEL ISD -$104,741 -$354,377 -$200,182
RUSK COUNTY 201907 MOUNT ENTERPRISE ISD -$204,542 -$451,596 -$279,599
RUSK COUNTY 201908 OVERTON ISD -$224,126 -$618,389 -$386,325
RUSK COUNTY 201910 TATUM ISD -$2,974,850 -$1,526,860 -$2,832,536
RUSK COUNTY 201914 WEST RUSK ISD -$1,484,772 -$1,228,780 -$2,001,903
SABINE COUNTY 202903 HEMPHILL ISD -$1,187,324 -$1,161,087 -$1,580,502

18 1/21/2011
40
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
SABINE COUNTY 202905 WEST SABINE ISD -$275,322 -$752,110 -$574,345
SAN AUGUSTINE COUNTY 203902 BROADDUS ISD -$331,858 -$565,853 -$458,835
SAN AUGUSTINE COUNTY 203901 SAN AUGUSTINE ISD -$906,327 -$847,091 -$587,663
SAN JACINTO COUNTY 204901 COLDSPRING-OAKHURST CONS ISD -$2,722,914 -$1,820,290 -$1,402,635
SAN JACINTO COUNTY 204904 SHEPHERD ISD -$891,277 -$1,954,723 -$1,195,058
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY 205901 ARANSAS PASS ISD -$2,181,330 -$1,778,988 -$1,275,244
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY 205902 GREGORY-PORTLAND ISD -$3,623,658 -$4,237,588 -$2,367,215
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY 205903 INGLESIDE ISD -$1,794,779 -$2,089,625 -$1,459,201
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY 205904 MATHIS ISD -$760,372 -$1,839,521 -$1,047,413
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY 205905 ODEM-EDROY ISD -$673,220 -$1,323,663 -$793,885
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY 205906 SINTON ISD -$1,032,727 -$2,309,780 -$1,309,347
SAN PATRICIO COUNTY 205907 TAFT ISD -$1,350,612 -$1,319,607 -$1,151,500
SAN SABA COUNTY 206903 CHEROKEE ISD -$120,689 -$181,035 -$124,140
SAN SABA COUNTY 206902 RICHLAND SPRINGS ISD -$166,372 -$276,316 -$174,299
SAN SABA COUNTY 206901 SAN SABA ISD -$527,051 -$864,188 -$659,769
SCHLEICHER COUNTY 207901 SCHLEICHER ISD -$1,072,956 -$974,690 -$1,285,486
SCURRY COUNTY 208901 HERMLEIGH ISD -$441,125 -$385,270 -$419,240
SCURRY COUNTY 208903 IRA ISD -$656,040 -$423,420 -$614,295
SCURRY COUNTY 208902 SNYDER ISD -$7,517,369 -$3,974,656 -$8,469,977
SHACKELFORD COUNTY 209901 ALBANY ISD -$876,184 -$722,290 -$994,043
SHACKELFORD COUNTY 209902 MORAN ISD -$166,617 -$378,684 -$432,277
SHELBY COUNTY 210901 CENTER ISD -$1,774,814 -$2,513,233 -$1,571,995
SHELBY COUNTY 210906 EXCELSIOR ISD -$234,808 -$209,325 -$202,081
SHELBY COUNTY 210902 JOAQUIN ISD -$876,175 -$951,665 -$1,234,565
SHELBY COUNTY 210903 SHELBYVILLE ISD -$733,576 -$983,266 -$1,379,898
SHELBY COUNTY 210904 TENAHA ISD -$260,007 -$766,530 -$1,152,474
SHELBY COUNTY 210905 TIMPSON ISD -$619,785 -$937,511 -$1,355,485
SHERMAN COUNTY 211902 STRATFORD ISD -$1,103,977 -$897,286 -$969,873
SHERMAN COUNTY 211901 TEXHOMA ISD -$167,975 -$141,582 -$152,043
SMITH COUNTY 212901 ARP ISD -$1,348,815 -$1,176,105 -$2,357,214
SMITH COUNTY 212902 BULLARD ISD -$2,260,882 -$2,206,495 -$2,904,694
SMITH COUNTY 212909 CHAPEL HILL ISD -$3,395,473 -$3,445,173 -$2,515,263
SMITH COUNTY 212903 LINDALE ISD -$3,291,717 -$3,666,016 -$3,266,123
SMITH COUNTY 212904 TROUP ISD -$1,350,521 -$1,427,161 -$3,209,999
SMITH COUNTY 212905 TYLER ISD -$22,389,817 -$18,666,255 -$19,342,091
SMITH COUNTY 212906 WHITEHOUSE ISD -$5,164,124 -$4,332,061 -$3,522,131
SMITH COUNTY 212910 WINONA ISD -$1,049,827 -$1,173,975 -$1,123,417
SOMERVELL COUNTY 213901 GLEN ROSE ISD -$3,584,378 -$2,756,724 -$3,391,293
STARR COUNTY 214901 RIO GRANDE CITY CISD -$4,463,091 -$12,114,616 -$7,083,478
STARR COUNTY 214903 ROMA ISD -$1,572,314 -$6,898,832 -$4,044,316
STARR COUNTY 214902 SAN ISIDRO ISD -$635,911 -$473,878 -$584,598
STEPHENS COUNTY 215901 BRECKENRIDGE ISD -$2,244,745 -$1,733,189 -$2,270,046
STERLING COUNTY 216901 STERLING CITY ISD -$348,445 -$432,483 -$323,014
STONEWALL COUNTY 217901 ASPERMONT ISD -$545,423 -$384,850 -$640,859
SUTTON COUNTY 218901 SONORA ISD -$3,960,326 -$1,797,335 -$3,849,383
SWISHER COUNTY 219901 HAPPY ISD -$251,388 -$372,160 -$367,679

19 1/21/2011
41
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
SWISHER COUNTY 219905 KRESS ISD -$179,242 -$270,298 -$160,550
SWISHER COUNTY 219903 TULIA ISD -$443,956 -$1,327,444 -$831,213
TARRANT COUNTY 220901 ARLINGTON ISD -$60,329,968 -$57,811,308 -$36,584,304
TARRANT COUNTY 220915 AZLE ISD -$7,509,994 -$5,618,489 -$5,883,708
TARRANT COUNTY 220902 BIRDVILLE ISD -$23,797,081 -$21,738,675 -$13,382,763
TARRANT COUNTY 220919 CARROLL ISD -$9,872,531 -$7,842,402 -$9,024,554
TARRANT COUNTY 220917 CASTLEBERRY ISD -$1,579,340 -$3,661,643 -$2,283,353
TARRANT COUNTY 220912 CROWLEY ISD -$16,122,640 -$14,134,833 -$10,649,286
TARRANT COUNTY 220918 EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD -$20,805,431 -$19,485,232 -$33,036,716
TARRANT COUNTY 220904 EVERMAN ISD -$3,608,918 -$5,628,806 -$3,206,827
TARRANT COUNTY 220905 FORT WORTH ISD -$82,212,722 -$78,540,008 -$53,493,640
TARRANT COUNTY 220906 GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLE ISD -$13,324,607 -$13,466,112 -$11,877,253
TARRANT COUNTY 220916 HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD -$28,139,581 -$21,496,256 -$24,647,835
TARRANT COUNTY 220907 KELLER ISD -$34,978,536 -$31,728,055 -$30,380,942
TARRANT COUNTY 220914 KENNEDALE ISD -$3,194,051 -$3,332,356 -$1,880,584
TARRANT COUNTY 220910 LAKE WORTH ISD -$2,307,500 -$3,346,569 -$2,914,987
TARRANT COUNTY 220908 MANSFIELD ISD -$31,255,538 -$32,983,837 -$30,869,420
TARRANT COUNTY 220920 WHITE SETTLEMENT ISD -$4,935,214 -$5,821,122 -$4,488,744
TAYLOR COUNTY 221901 ABILENE ISD -$12,127,666 -$15,783,110 -$9,748,266
TAYLOR COUNTY 221911 JIM NED CONS ISD -$1,001,471 -$1,351,040 -$4,351,079
TAYLOR COUNTY 221904 MERKEL ISD -$1,246,873 -$1,464,672 -$2,467,284
TAYLOR COUNTY 221905 TRENT ISD -$46,498 -$270,572 -$11,328
TAYLOR COUNTY 221912 WYLIE ISD -$3,902,775 -$3,272,202 -$4,814,090
TERRELL COUNTY 222901 TERRELL COUNTY ISD -$818,996 -$432,283 -$789,742
TERRY COUNTY 223901 BROWNFIELD ISD -$2,113,964 -$2,104,478 -$2,209,737
TERRY COUNTY 223902 MEADOW ISD -$221,839 -$350,166 -$197,840
TERRY COUNTY 223904 WELLMAN-UNION CONS ISD -$206,939 -$305,031 -$164,409
THROCKMORTON COUNTY 224901 THROCKMORTON ISD -$355,079 -$319,894 -$378,384
THROCKMORTON COUNTY 224902 WOODSON ISD -$99,477 -$224,748 -$180,984
TITUS COUNTY 225906 CHAPEL HILL ISD -$351,424 -$1,063,994 -$900,449
TITUS COUNTY 225907 HARTS BLUFF ISD -$430,339 -$561,395 -$743,484
TITUS COUNTY 225902 MOUNT PLEASANT ISD -$7,141,538 -$5,343,742 -$4,103,577
TITUS COUNTY 225905 WINFIELD ISD -$166,825 -$240,661 -$151,428
TOM GREEN COUNTY 226901 CHRISTOVAL ISD -$465,804 -$607,094 -$405,571
TOM GREEN COUNTY 226907 GRAPE CREEK ISD -$412,173 -$1,269,087 -$719,872
TOM GREEN COUNTY 226903 SAN ANGELO ISD -$10,599,406 -$12,717,773 -$10,047,377
TOM GREEN COUNTY 226908 VERIBEST ISD -$247,835 -$321,643 -$182,959
TOM GREEN COUNTY 226906 WALL ISD -$822,835 -$1,374,873 -$1,690,342
TOM GREEN COUNTY 226905 WATER VALLEY ISD -$361,976 -$476,079 -$415,833
TRAVIS COUNTY 227901 AUSTIN ISD -$181,876,037 -$98,898,010 -$174,193,767
TRAVIS COUNTY 227910 DEL VALLE ISD -$10,207,712 -$11,709,641 -$13,044,535
TRAVIS COUNTY 227909 EANES ISD -$11,405,745 -$8,327,732 -$10,413,109
TRAVIS COUNTY 227912 LAGO VISTA ISD -$2,689,660 -$1,547,204 -$2,570,415
TRAVIS COUNTY 227913 LAKE TRAVIS ISD -$13,292,766 -$7,666,627 -$12,583,389
TRAVIS COUNTY 227907 MANOR ISD -$9,240,353 -$10,734,056 -$15,334,573
TRAVIS COUNTY 227904 PFLUGERVILLE ISD -$23,920,509 -$22,596,423 -$18,964,817

20 1/21/2011
42
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
TRINITY COUNTY 228905 APPLE SPRINGS ISD -$114,327 -$256,129 -$241,384
TRINITY COUNTY 228904 CENTERVILLE ISD -$85,656 -$193,486 -$146,808
TRINITY COUNTY 228901 GROVETON ISD -$755,435 -$911,265 -$625,663
TRINITY COUNTY 228903 TRINITY ISD -$951,039 -$1,244,237 -$1,040,157
TYLER COUNTY 229906 CHESTER ISD -$196,405 -$224,918 -$162,728
TYLER COUNTY 229901 COLMESNEIL ISD -$334,264 -$524,298 -$329,611
TYLER COUNTY 229905 SPURGER ISD -$209,954 -$407,261 -$289,860
TYLER COUNTY 229904 WARREN -$787,770 -$1,332,429 -$1,422,635
TYLER COUNTY 229903 WOODVILLE ISD -$2,630,732 -$1,932,376 -$3,707,299
UPSHUR COUNTY 230901 BIG SANDY ISD -$572,636 -$823,910 -$623,719
UPSHUR COUNTY 230902 GILMER ISD -$2,894,969 -$2,564,355 -$3,173,895
UPSHUR COUNTY 230905 HARMONY ISD -$1,261,810 -$1,259,335 -$1,396,896
UPSHUR COUNTY 230906 NEW DIANA ISD -$504,951 -$1,095,520 -$1,032,115
UPSHUR COUNTY 230903 ORE CITY ISD -$481,096 -$975,682 -$606,216
UPSHUR COUNTY 230908 UNION GROVE ISD -$690,451 -$942,624 -$1,167,449
UPSHUR COUNTY 230904 UNION HILL ISD -$275,153 -$352,060 -$290,583
UPTON COUNTY 231901 MCCAMEY ISD -$1,491,457 -$937,178 -$1,432,737
UPTON COUNTY 231902 RANKIN ISD -$697,718 -$583,271 -$671,152
UVALDE COUNTY 232901 KNIPPA ISD -$151,374 -$264,831 -$241,506
UVALDE COUNTY 232902 SABINAL ISD -$623,240 -$676,994 -$1,296,539
UVALDE COUNTY 232904 UTOPIA ISD -$524,574 -$373,780 -$630,063
UVALDE COUNTY 232903 UVALDE CONS ISD -$2,553,810 -$4,459,733 -$3,932,382
VAL VERDE COUNTY 233903 COMSTOCK ISD -$584,628 -$358,243 -$550,136
VAL VERDE COUNTY 233901 SAN FELIPE-DEL RIO CONS ISD -$4,349,358 -$9,768,066 -$5,937,260
VAN ZANDT COUNTY 234902 CANTON ISD -$1,927,368 -$2,064,887 -$1,949,892
VAN ZANDT COUNTY 234903 EDGEWOOD ISD -$653,719 -$1,065,571 -$1,074,495
VAN ZANDT COUNTY 234909 FRUITVALE ISD -$183,078 -$450,650 -$279,358
VAN ZANDT COUNTY 234904 GRAND SALINE ISD -$732,241 -$1,392,489 -$2,974,209
VAN ZANDT COUNTY 234905 MARTINS MILL ISD -$277,749 -$606,062 -$529,566
VAN ZANDT COUNTY 234906 VAN ISD -$1,818,169 -$2,476,595 -$1,677,309
VAN ZANDT COUNTY 234907 WILLS POINT ISD -$1,589,068 -$2,652,208 -$1,962,887
VICTORIA COUNTY 235901 BLOOMINGTON ISD -$434,814 -$935,988 -$604,002
VICTORIA COUNTY 235904 NURSERY ISD -$306,600 -$194,481 -$304,850
VICTORIA COUNTY 235902 VICTORIA ISD -$13,742,826 -$12,404,844 -$8,931,251
WALKER COUNTY 236902 HUNTSVILLE ISD -$5,502,221 -$5,732,189 -$4,174,092
WALKER COUNTY 236901 NEW WAVERLY ISD -$619,438 -$1,053,703 -$1,144,676
WALLER COUNTY 237902 HEMPSTEAD ISD -$1,346,166 -$1,686,756 -$1,046,285
WALLER COUNTY 237905 ROYAL ISD -$2,231,958 -$2,389,034 -$2,444,411
WALLER COUNTY 237904 WALLER ISD -$5,100,623 -$5,577,875 -$4,563,279
WARD COUNTY 238904 GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY ISD -$407,862 -$263,157 -$515,330
WARD COUNTY 238902 MONAHANS-WICKETT-PYOTE ISD -$3,868,105 -$2,459,503 -$3,494,959
WASHINGTON COUNTY 239901 BRENHAM ISD -$6,436,706 -$4,824,853 -$5,091,014
WASHINGTON COUNTY 239903 BURTON ISD -$623,165 -$512,645 -$582,644
WEBB COUNTY 240901 LAREDO ISD -$6,926,418 -$26,023,049 -$24,726,622
WEBB COUNTY 240903 UNITED ISD -$31,655,844 -$45,153,546 -$51,082,777
WEBB COUNTY 240904 WEBB CONS ISD -$3,463,623 -$1,011,837 -$3,424,989

21 1/21/2011
43
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
WHARTON COUNTY 241901 BOLING ISD -$588,761 -$1,135,635 -$928,692
WHARTON COUNTY 241902 EAST BERNARD ISD -$886,536 -$1,151,308 -$783,845
WHARTON COUNTY 241903 EL CAMPO ISD -$3,582,489 -$4,020,816 -$6,097,613
WHARTON COUNTY 241906 LOUISE ISD -$539,451 -$667,050 -$504,669
WHARTON COUNTY 241904 WHARTON ISD -$2,752,037 -$2,266,152 -$1,906,461
WHEELER COUNTY 242906 FORT ELLIOTT CONS ISD -$865,697 -$514,839 -$844,058
WHEELER COUNTY 242905 KELTON ISD -$1,722,557 -$514,384 -$1,714,408
WHEELER COUNTY 242902 SHAMROCK ISD -$516,768 -$433,587 -$433,778
WHEELER COUNTY 242903 WHEELER ISD -$815,236 -$588,136 -$995,596
WICHITA COUNTY 243901 BURKBURNETT ISD -$2,333,625 -$3,621,115 -$2,001,919
WICHITA COUNTY 243906 CITY VIEW ISD -$537,845 -$948,345 -$589,949
WICHITA COUNTY 243902 ELECTRA ISD -$711,430 -$631,671 -$815,503
WICHITA COUNTY 243903 IOWA PARK CONS ISD -$1,671,946 -$1,661,914 -$1,265,094
WICHITA COUNTY 243905 WICHITA FALLS ISD -$12,363,932 -$13,477,473 -$8,771,143
WILBARGER COUNTY 244901 HARROLD ISD -$141,611 -$209,284 -$346,963
WILBARGER COUNTY 244905 NORTHSIDE ISD -$82,043 -$248,723 -$147,486
WILBARGER COUNTY 244903 VERNON ISD -$2,410,714 -$2,537,390 -$3,553,889
WILLACY COUNTY 245901 LASARA ISD -$119,997 -$700,807 -$690,847
WILLACY COUNTY 245902 LYFORD CISD -$591,341 -$1,744,236 -$1,072,670
WILLACY COUNTY 245903 RAYMONDVILLE ISD -$1,239,852 -$2,378,980 -$2,418,168
WILLACY COUNTY 245904 SAN PERLITA ISD -$202,824 -$423,036 -$261,366
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246914 COUPLAND ISD -$173,396 -$179,323 -$172,854
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246902 FLORENCE ISD -$823,198 -$1,199,836 -$1,149,372
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246904 GEORGETOWN ISD -$16,697,205 -$11,900,968 -$19,163,929
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246905 GRANGER ISD -$315,684 -$488,746 -$329,861
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246906 HUTTO ISD -$4,399,595 -$6,320,037 -$7,507,152
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246907 JARRELL ISD -$1,992,458 -$1,471,867 -$3,013,820
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246913 LEANDER ISD -$41,910,591 -$37,221,405 -$61,307,431
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246908 LIBERTY HILL ISD -$3,278,438 -$2,872,049 -$2,982,439
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246909 ROUND ROCK ISD -$63,522,174 -$46,949,717 -$73,137,694
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246911 TAYLOR ISD -$2,476,543 -$3,159,863 -$1,948,865
WILLIAMSON COUNTY 246912 THRALL ISD -$503,205 -$752,572 -$464,201
WILSON COUNTY 247901 FLORESVILLE ISD -$3,000,202 -$3,840,001 -$3,039,214
WILSON COUNTY 247903 LA VERNIA ISD -$2,161,233 -$3,048,211 -$1,966,308
WILSON COUNTY 247904 POTH ISD -$517,809 -$901,223 -$551,753
WILSON COUNTY 247906 STOCKDALE ISD -$511,586 -$932,347 -$797,575
WINKLER COUNTY 248901 KERMIT ISD -$2,240,840 -$1,693,004 -$2,068,760
WINKLER COUNTY 248902 WINK-LOVING ISD -$2,790,234 -$1,062,948 -$2,750,648
WISE COUNTY 249901 ALVORD ISD -$839,636 -$943,633 -$899,278
WISE COUNTY 249902 BOYD ISD -$2,326,213 -$1,452,213 -$2,136,817
WISE COUNTY 249903 BRIDGEPORT ISD -$4,008,887 -$2,802,452 -$4,564,803
WISE COUNTY 249904 CHICO ISD -$1,349,468 -$848,972 -$1,287,898
WISE COUNTY 249905 DECATUR ISD -$6,203,381 -$3,733,467 -$5,873,731
WISE COUNTY 249906 PARADISE ISD -$1,001,492 -$1,390,417 -$2,294,153
WISE COUNTY 249908 SLIDELL ISD -$609,017 -$357,045 -$621,232
WOOD COUNTY 250906 ALBA-GOLDEN ISD -$716,138 -$969,108 -$736,597

22 1/21/2011
44
IMPACT OF REDUCING PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING BY $5 BILLION PER YEAR
CHANGE FROM CURRENT LAW PROJECTION FOR 2011-12
NO ASATR, REDUCE
BA TO $4,304,
PRORATE FORMULA 14.956% DISTRICT EQUALIZED
District AID, INCLUDING GENERAL FUND WEALTH TO
County Name Number District Name ASATR REDUCTION $430,400
WOOD COUNTY 250902 HAWKINS ISD -$1,589,905 -$1,051,346 -$1,512,866
WOOD COUNTY 250903 MINEOLA ISD -$1,427,124 -$1,759,910 -$1,386,505
WOOD COUNTY 250904 QUITMAN ISD -$1,325,149 -$1,346,328 -$1,511,996
WOOD COUNTY 250907 WINNSBORO ISD -$1,275,691 -$1,533,837 -$1,323,007
WOOD COUNTY 250905 YANTIS ISD -$838,387 -$559,060 -$909,921
YOAKUM COUNTY 251901 DENVER CITY ISD -$4,686,722 -$2,572,383 -$4,540,254
YOAKUM COUNTY 251902 PLAINS ISD -$1,523,883 -$901,068 -$1,471,068
YOUNG COUNTY 252901 GRAHAM ISD -$1,987,377 -$2,617,525 -$2,259,741
YOUNG COUNTY 252902 NEWCASTLE ISD -$162,964 -$261,826 -$171,630
YOUNG COUNTY 252903 OLNEY ISD -$575,118 -$1,075,465 -$647,087
ZAPATA COUNTY 253901 ZAPATA COUNTY ISD -$8,512,145 -$4,993,488 -$8,128,440
ZAVALA COUNTY 254901 CRYSTAL CITY ISD -$595,374 -$2,011,699 -$1,450,186
ZAVALA COUNTY 254902 LA PRYOR ISD -$139,383 -$768,164 -$444,044
STATE TOTALS -$5,003,512,393 -$5,000,000,000 -$5,004,395,638

23 1/21/2011
45
Responses to Questions Regarding
Increases in Education Staff and Expenditures
As the legislature has begun reviewing the financing of state government, many are concerned that
public education budget cuts are being justified by attacks on district staffing and finance decisions
made over past years. Although public education must confront the potential of reduced revenue,
charges that school districts have misspent available funds must be answered. Below are some
misperceptions that deserve a response. We will provide additional information as new questions
arise.

Misperception #1: The ratio of teachers to non-teaching staff has shifted from 5:1 in the
1970s to 1:1 today.

Texas did not count all staff in the 1970s—the largest portion of non-teaching staff, auxiliary
staff, were not counted until the PEIMS data collection system was put into place in the 1980s.
A look at comparable data shows that the percentage of teachers to non-teachers has actually
not changed substantially since the late 1980s. The percentage of staff that are teachers has
declined from 52 percent to 50 percent since 1989-90—a slight decrease, but nothing like
moving from 5:1 to 1:1.

% % %
Total % Professional Campus Central % %
Year Staff Teachers Support Admin Admin Aides Auxiliary
1989-90 383,349 52 5 3 2 8 30
1994-95 449,421 52 7 2 1 9 29
1999-00 522,422 51 7 3 1 10 28
2004-05 583,760 50 8 3 1 10 28
2009-10 659,821 50 9 3 1 10 27

The percentage of staff who are auxiliary (typically maintenance staff, custodians,
transportation staff, and food service staff) has actually declined during this time while the
percentage of aides and professional support personnel has slightly increased. This suggests a
minor shift away from operations expenses toward instructional support, and probably
corresponds to districts’ increased emphasis on academic performance as accountability
requirements grew during this timeframe. An additional factor is the use of contract personnel
to replace employees.

Page 1 of 4

46
Misperception #2: Since there are a large number of non-teaching staff, staff reductions can
be made without impacting classroom instruction.

Non-teaching staff will no doubt be reduced if some of the budget scenarios currently being
proposed are implemented, but cuts cannot come from non-teaching staff alone, and these cuts
will impact the level of services currently provided.

In looking at general fund expenditures (over which districts will have the most degree of
control when making budgetary decisions), teacher salaries were $15.2 billion, or 64 percent of
total salary costs in 2009-10. All non-teaching salaries combined totaled $8.4 billion that year.
Even a 50 percent reduction in all non-teaching staff would leave districts short of finding the
cuts necessary to implement the reductions called for in the introduced appropriations bills.

Worse, substantial reductions in these areas would impact the level of services provided to
students. Elimination of positions such as school librarians, counselors, nurses, principals,
assistant principals, food service staff, custodians, and school bus drivers will change the
atmosphere on our public school campuses and push more responsibility for fulfilling these
functions onto classroom teachers, who should be focused on instruction.

Misperception # 3. There is unexplainable growth in public school expenditures.

Over time, Texas has increased expenditures for public education, even on a per student basis.
Between 1997-98 and 2008-09, per student spending from all funds has grown by 72 percent,
counting capital outlay and debt services. However, counting both capital outlay and debt
service arguably double-counts a portion of the funds expended on school construction by
adding the actual dollars spent for construction to the payments on debt associated with those
same expenditures. Further, since Texas adds 70,000 to 80,000 students to our school system
each year, our school districts have been struggling to keep pace with a growing demand for
classroom space. During this time, the state has added 1,269 campuses in addition to
expansions and renovations.

Restricting the analysis to operating funds, spending still grew over this timeframe by 59
percent per student. Some of this increase is attributable to increases in federal funds associated
with things like IDEA, Title I and the free breakfast and lunch programs. General fund
operating expenditures have grown by 54 percent during this time (unadjusted for inflation).
Much of this growth was due to legislative decisions to invest in particular areas, like
improving teacher wages. For example:

In 1999, the legislature passed a required teacher pay increase of $3,000 per teacher. It
also put the pre-kindergarten grants in place and a 9th grade initiative aimed at
improving graduation rates;
In 2001, the legislature passed new requirements for school districts to offer health
care benefits, including a $1,000 pay supplement for school staff that could be used for
the purchase of health insurance.
Page 2 of 4

47
In 2003, the legislature passed a $110 per WADA supplement to school districts that
could be used for any necessary educational expenses.
In 2005, the legislature bought down property tax rates and established the target
revenue system. At the same time, it required a $2,500 teacher salary increase and
provided for a new high school allotment that was to be used to improve graduation
rates and prepare students for a college readiness curriculum,
In 2007, the legislature provided $23.63 per student to be used for staff salaries and
provide for a substantial number of new grant programs aimed at improving high
school effectiveness; and
In 2009, the legislature passed a required pay increase of $800 or half of any new
dollars associated with formula changes designed to improve equity.
In all of these years, the legislature provided equalized funding for tax rate increases.

In addition, school districts have been busy responding to a changed student-population as well
as changed educational expectations. The percentage of students who are from low-income
families has increased from 48.5 percent in 1997-98 to 56.7 percent in 2008-09. However, this
has not kept Texas from increasing academic expectations. Districts have worked hard to
implement additional requirements for mathematics education, train teachers to instruct to
higher-level college readiness standards, and provide student support as more challenging
assessments are administered.

Misperception # 4. School districts can rely on fund balances to weather this storm.

The optimum fund balance calculation established by TEA now requires school districts to add
two months cash disbursements to dollars needed to cover any cash flow deficits. Fall cash
flow deficits occur because districts often need surplus funds to operate schools in the fall
months before the bulk of property taxes are received in December and January. Other cash
flow deficits are due to delays in payments from state or federal sources.

2008-09 audit reports showed $3.4 billion in statewide one month cash disbursements, so two
months would cost an estimated $6.8 billion. $4.3 billion were required to cover cash flow
deficits. Combined, these rules call for fund balances of $11.1 billion, substantially in excess
of what our school districts currently maintain.

Texas operates a large public school system. In 2008-09, our school system served 4.7 million
students and paid the salaries of 650,000 staff. While some districts may be able to tap into
fund balances to temporarily cover some of the cost of cuts, the prudent operation of a system
of this size requires substantial reserves and prevents additional cost increases due to the need
to borrow.

Page 3 of 4

48
Misperception # 5. Districts that need additional revenue because of cuts can hold tax rate
elections to make up the difference.

Many school districts have already gone to the voters for additional taxing authority and cannot
legally access any additional pennies. Others may be able to do so, but cannot access enough
additional revenue to make up for the kinds of cuts the legislature is contemplating in the
proposed budget. In fact, if all school districts were to successfully go to the voters for the
maximum taxing authority allowed by statute, the total available additional revenue is $2.4
billion. This includes increased local property taxes of $2 billion, increased recapture costs of
$346 million, and increased state aid requirements of $780 million in guaranteed yield funds
that would be available by law. This is roughly half of what HB 1 and SB1 contemplate in cuts
to the Foundation School Program.

These additional pennies were put into place to ensure meaningful local discretion over tax
rates in response to a court mandate. Accessing them to make up for cuts in base state aid runs
counter to this purpose.

Page 4 of 4

49
2011-12 Budget
Resource Allocation Work
Study

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 1


Allocation
50 Work Study-February 24, 2011
Resource Allocation
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• “High performing districts ensure that the


necessary resources, including time,
money, personnel, and materials are
allocated to accomplish the district’s
goals.”
OBJECTIVE 3

• “This can mean cutting back on or


dropping initiatives that are not aligned
with district goals for achievement and
instruction.”

District Leadership That Works – Robert Marzano & Timothy


Waters, page 8

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 2


Allocation Work
51 Study-February 24, 2011
State Financing
Plan – Background
History

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 3


Allocation
52 Work Study-February 24, 2011
Texas State Financing Plan
Background History
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Fact - The quality of being actual,


not speculation.

• Fact: In 2006, the Texas Legislature


OBJECTIVE 3

passed House Bill (HB) 1. The


legislation provided a reduction of
Maintenance & Operation (M&O) tax
rates and the creation of the “Target
Revenue” funding model.

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 4


Allocation Work
53 Study-February 24, 2011
Texas State Financing Plan continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Goal - Something that one hopes or


intends to accomplish.

• The goal of Target Revenue funding


OBJECTIVE 3

was to prevent school district revenue


LOSSES due to the M&O property tax
relief measure.

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 5


Allocation Work
54 Study-February 24, 2011
Texas State Financing Plan continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Reality - Something that actually


exists.
• Reality: Target Revenue tied C-FB to
2006 revenue levels without ability to
OBJECTIVE 3

increase other than a voter approved


tax increase.
• Since Target Revenue is tied to 2006
revenue, it is not equal among school
districts.

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 6


Allocation Work
55 Study-February 24, 2011
State Deficit
Information

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 7


Allocation
56 Work Study-February 24, 2011
Texas State Deficit Information
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Supposition - (1.) To assume to be


real or true for the sake of an
argument or explanation. (2a.) To
believe, especially, on uncertain or
OBJECTIVE 3

tentative grounds. (2b.) To consider


to be likely.

• The Texas Legislature is faced with a


$20-$27 BILLION dollar deficit for the
coming biennium.
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 8
Allocation Work
57 Study-February 24, 2011
Texas State Deficit Information
continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• HB1 & SB1 will be revised many times


before the end of the legislative
session, but it is clear that all Texas
School Districts including C-FB ISD
OBJECTIVE 3

will face state revenue reductions for


2011-12 and 2012-13.

HB – House Bill; SB – Senate Bill


C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 9
Allocation Work
58 Study-February 24, 2011
Texas State Deficit Information
continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Current third party estimates show


C-FB revenue reductions of between
$26 - $44 million for 2011-12.
OBJECTIVE 3

• Revenue for 2012-13 would remain at


the new Lower level (basically equal
to the reduced 2011-12 amount).

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 10


Allocation Work
59 Study-February 24, 2011
Texas State Deficit Information
continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Perspective – (1.) The relationship of


aspects of a subject to each other
and to a whole. (2.) Subjective
evaluation of relative significance.
OBJECTIVE 3

• $26 million = approximately 473


staffing positions
• $44 million = approximately 800
staffing positions

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 11


Allocation Work
60 Study-February 24, 2011
Texas State Deficit Information
continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Public School Districts make up


44% of the state’s budget.
OBJECTIVE 3

• Final Legislative Action may not


be known until May-June or later.

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 12


Allocation Work
61 Study-February 24, 2011
C-FB ISD’s
Financial Position

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 13


Allocation
62 Work Study-February 24, 2011
C-FB ISD Financial Position

• Fact: Due to reductions the district


has made over the past several
years, C-FB is in a better financial
position to weather this storm than
many districts.

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 14


Allocation Work
63 Study-February 24, 2011
C-FB ISD Financial Position continued

• Plan - A method worked out in


advance for achieving some
objective.
• Past reductions, although painful, will
allow C-FB some breathing room, so we
can plan wisely and not react in crisis
mode.
• Plan: Instead, we will be able to wait to
see what our portion of the deficit is
before proposing large program and/or
staffing reductions.
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 15
Allocation Work
64 Study-February 24, 2011
C-FB ISD Financial Position continued
GENERAL FUND - FUND BALANCE
and PERCENTAGE of ACTUAL EXPENDITURES

Excluding Tax Increment Finance Zone & Chapter 41 Payments


in $1,000's of dollars (*Estimated: **Budget)

$80,000

$60,000

$40,000

$20,000

$0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 *2010 **2011
GF Fund Bal $48,641 $47,424 $49,568 $53,215 $55,456 $65,014 $62,489 $63,047 $70,831 $64,825
% Tl Bdgt 30.68% 29.57% 30.27% 32.65% 32.15% 35.70% 31.42% 27.30% 35.70% 31.51%
Days Operating 112 108 110 119 117 130 115 115 130 115

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 16


Allocation Work
65 Study-February 24, 2011
C-FB ISD Resource Allocation
Strategy
This means that
• The C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Resource
Allocation Proposed Strategy is
– No immediate Draconian Staffing Reductions
– No immediate Reduction of C-FB ISD
Signature Programs/Initiatives
– Decision Points will be Use of Levers
available to us
• Utilization of a portion of Fund Balance
• Tax Ratification Election
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 17
Allocation Work
66 Study-February 24, 2011
C-FB ISD Resource Allocation
Strategy continued
• Stop Look Listen
• Rate your agreement with the
Basic Strategy
– No immediate Draconian Staffing Reductions
– No immediate Reduction of C-FB ISD
Signature Programs/Initiatives
– Decision Points will be Use of Levers
available to us
• Utilization of a portion of Fund Balance
• Tax Ratification Election
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 18
Allocation Work
67 Study-February 24, 2011
Board Decisions
to Ponder

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 19


Allocation
68 Work Study-February 24, 2011
Board Decisions to Ponder
• Ponder - To give serious and careful
thoughts to.

• Fund Balance Utilization – How much


• Tax Election – No Tax Election
– If Tax Election
• For how many pennies (Maximum $0.13)
• When
– September
– November
• Raise
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 20
Allocation Work
69 Study-February 24, 2011
Projection Models

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 21


Allocation
70 Work Study-February 24, 2011
Projection Models
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Model - A preliminary pattern serving as


the plan from which an item not yet
constructed will be produced.
• As If - Something taken as being true or
OBJECTIVE 3

factual and used as a starting point for a


course of action or reasoning.

• Models are presented as if current State revenue


formulas are not changed to accommodate a
reduction in public school funding.
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 22
Allocation Work
71 Study-February 24, 2011
Projection Models continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Probability - (1.) The quality or state of


being probable. (2.) Likelihood.

• The Models should be viewed keeping in


OBJECTIVE 3

mind the probability that State reductions in


school district funding will become a reality.

• However, the actual reduction amount is not


currently known.
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 23
Allocation Work
72 Study-February 24, 2011
Projection Models
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Model “A” • Model “B”


• No Tax Increase • Maximum Tax
Increase
• No Raise • No Raise
• No new • No new
OBJECTIVE 3

Programs or Programs or
Initiatives Initiatives

Objective 3 – Reduce Costs,


where possible, for Increased
Efficiencies

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 24


Allocation Work
73 Study-February 24, 2011
Projection Models continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Estimate – (1.) To calculate


approximate amount or extent of.
(2a.) A preliminary calculation of
OBJECTIVE 3

the cost of a project. (2b.) The


statement of such a calculation.

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 25


Allocation Work
74 Study-February 24, 2011
Model “A”
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Tax Rate $1.04 – Deficit


– No change • $3 million
• Estimates – Fund Balance
– Revenue • $61 million
OBJECTIVE 3

• $214 million • ($35 million if


State reduces
– Expenditure revenue $26
• $217 million million)
– No Raise • 110 days
• (63 days)
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 26
Allocation Work
75 Study-February 24, 2011
Model “B”
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Tax Rate $1.17 – Surplus


– Increase $0.13 • $12 million
– Requires Tax – Fund Balance
Ratification Election
• $76 million
• Estimates
• ($50 million if
OBJECTIVE 3

– Revenue State reduces


• $232 million revenue $26
– Expenditure million)
• $220 million • 138 Days
– No Raise
• Includes Chapter 41 • (90 days)
payment
– $3 million
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 27
Allocation Work
76 Study-February 24, 2011
Additional
Information

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 28


Allocation
77 Work Study-February 24, 2011
Additional Information
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• 1% Raise costs approximately $1.4


million

• $0.01 of tax increase generates


OBJECTIVE 3

approximately $1.377 million


EXCLUDING Chapter 41

• $0.13 of tax increase net of Chapter 41


generates approximately $15 million
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 29
Allocation Work
78 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study
Activity

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 30


Allocation
79 Work Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Fund Balance
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Fund Balance Utilization


– Context
• What is Fund Balance?
– Created or Increased when Revenues
OBJECTIVE 3

exceed Expenditures for a fiscal period


– Decreased when Expenditures exceed
Revenues
– Positive Fund Balance represents financial
resources available to finance Expenditures
of the next fiscal period

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 31


Allocation Work
80 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Fund Balance
continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

– Common Misconception that Fund


Balance is a Cash Account
• Part of Fund Balance is Cash, but other
portions of the Fund Balance is not cash
such as
OBJECTIVE 3

– Inventories
– Receivable
» Which cannot be converted to cash
quickly
– Portions are committed to provide funding
for purchase orders that were outstanding at
the fiscal year end
» Called encumbrances
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 32
Allocation Work
81 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Fund Balance
continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

– A District with an Adequate Fund


Balance Can
• Avoid short-term borrowing
– Avoid interest costs
OBJECTIVE 3

• Demonstrate financial stability


– Preserve or enhance its bond rating
» Lowering debt issuance costs
– Provide for unforeseen expenditure
requirements

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 33


Allocation Work
82 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Fund Balance
continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

– How Much Fund Balance is Appropriate


• Less than 90 days may cause the
district to borrow money to fund
operations
OBJECTIVE 3

• Less than 60 days may cause loss of


financial standing
• Substantial use of Fund Balance can
only be used for ONE YEAR

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 34


Allocation Work
83 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Fund Balance
continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

– Fund Balance Activity

• Discuss your comfort level with the


District utilizing Fund Balance
OBJECTIVE 3

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 35


Allocation Work
84 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Exercise-Tax
Ratification Election (TRE)
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• Tax Ratification Election (TRE)


– Context
• TRE requires Tax Election
– September
OBJECTIVE 3

– November
• Maximum pennies $0.13
• Above $1.06 – possible Chapter 41
payment

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 36


Allocation Work
85 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Tax Ratification
Election (TRE) continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

Year Passed Failed Total %


2006 14 1 15 93
2007 94 26 120 78
2008 71 46 117 61
OBJECTIVE 3

2009 29 18 47 62
2010 56 16 72 78
Total 264 107 371 71

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 37


Allocation Work
86 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Tax
Ratification Election (TRE)
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

• TRE Activity

• Discuss your comfort level with calling a


Tax Ratification Election
OBJECTIVE 3

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 38


Allocation Work
87 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Raise
• Raise
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

– Context
• Impact on the New Hire Schedule
• Raises may help the District recruit High
Quality Employees
OBJECTIVE 3

• Raises affect Employee Morale (can be


a negative or positive depending on
how administered; i.e. across the board
or to selected groups)
• Raises affect community perceptions
• 1% raise across the board costs
approximately $1.4 million
C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 39
Allocation Work
88 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Raise continued
Continuously Improve Operational Effectiveness

DFW Finance Survey: PAY & RAISE


2010-2011
2007-2008 2008-09 2009-10
Beginning Beginning Beginning Beginning Raise
Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher Non-
District Pay Pay Pay Pay Administrators Administrators

Irving $44,000 $46,400 $48,300 1 $49,200 2.00% 2.00%


1% of 1% of
Birdville $46,000 $47,000 $48,000 2 $48,500 midpoint midpoint
OBJECTIVE 3

Northwest $46,322 $47,000 $47,500 3 $48,200 2.50% 2.50%

Mansfield $44,000 $45,800 $46,800 4 $47,500 2.00% 2.00%

Coppell $43,808 $45,370 $46,370 5 $47,155 2.00% 2.00%

C-FB $43,250 $45,000 $45,940 6 $46,741 2.50% 2.50%

Grand Prairie $43,500 $45,500 $46,500 7 $46,500 1.5%-2% 1.5%-2%

Mesquite $43,225 $45,000 $45,900 8 $46,300 1.50% 1.50%

Highland Park $44,000 $45,275 $46,055 9 $46,250 2.00% 2.00%

Plano $43,150 $44,250 $45,100 10 $46,150 2.50% 2.50%

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 40


Allocation Work
89 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Raise continued
DFW Finance Survey: PAY & RAISE
2010-2011
2007-2008 2008-09 2009-10
Beginning Beginning Beginning Beginning Raise
Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher Non-
District Pay Pay Pay Pay Administrators Administrators
2% of 2% of
Allen $42,625 $44,500 $45,000 11 $46,000 midpoint midpoint
2% of 2% of
Frisco $43,000 $44,500 $45,250 12 $46,000 Midpoint Midpoint

Richardson $42,850 $44,000 $45,100 13 $45,800 2.00% 2.00%

Cedar Hill $43,000 $44,500 $45,600 14 $45,600 $0 $0

Wylie $40,000 $43,000 $44,000 15 $45,500 3.00% 3.00%

Arlington $44,000 $44,500 $45,422 16 $45,422 $0 $0

Lewisville $43,700 $44,600 $44,900 17 $45,350 1.18% aver of 1.18%

Lancaster $42,100 $43,328 $44,428 18 $45,250 2.50% 2.50%


1% of 1% of
McKinney $43,000 $44,000 $44,900 19 $45,100 Midpoint Midpoint

Duncanville $41,000 $41,000 $44,000 20 $45,000 3.00% 3.00%

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 41


Allocation Work
90 Study-February 24, 2011
Work Study Activity-Raise continued

• Raise Activity

– Discuss at your table the importance of


raises.

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 42


Allocation Work
91 Study-February 24, 2011
BREAK

• BREAK

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 43


Allocation Work
92 Study-February 24, 2011
Here is What We Think We Heard

• Fund Balance Utilization

• TRE

• Raise

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 44


Allocation Work
93 Study-February 24, 2011
Reference

• District Leadership that Works – Robert


J. Marzano, Timothy Waters

• Webster’s II New College Dictionary

• Merriam-Webster on-line Dictionary


and Thesaurus

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 45


Allocation Work
94 Study-February 24, 2011
2011-12 Budget
Resource Allocation Work
Study

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget Resource 46


Allocation
95 Work Study-February 24, 2011
• Fund Balance Utilization

• Context:

• What is Fund Balance?


o Created or Increased when Revenues exceed Expenditures for a fiscal period
o Decreased when Expenditures exceed Revenues
o Positive Fund Balance represents financial resources available to available to
finance Expenditures of the next fiscal period

• Common Misconception that Fund Balance is a Cash Account


o Part of Fund Balance is Cash, but other portions of the Fund Balance is not cash
such as
ƒ Inventories
ƒ Receivable
• Which cannot be converted to cash quickly
o Portions are committed to provide funding for purchase orders that were outstanding
at the fiscal year end
ƒ Called encumbrances

• A District with an Adequate Fund Balance Can


o Avoid short-term borrowing
ƒ Avoid interest costs
o Demonstrate financial stability
ƒ Preserve or enhance its bond rating
• Lowering debt issuance costs
o Provide for unforeseen expenditure requirements

• How Much Fund Balance is Appropriate


o Less than 90 days may cause the district to borrow money to fund operations
o Less than 60 days may cause loss of financial standing
o Substantial use of Fund Balance can only be used for ONE YEAR

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget


Resource Allocation Work Study-February 24, 2011

96
• Tax Ratification Election (TRE)

• Context

• TRE requires Tax Election


o September
o November

• Maximum pennies $0.13

• Above $1.06 – possible Chapter 41 payment

• TRE State Election Results

Year Passed Failed Total %


2006 14 1 15 93
2007 94 26 120 78
2008 71 46 117 61
2009 29 18 47 62
2010 56 16 72 78
Total 264 107 371 71

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget


Resource Allocation Work Study-February 24, 2011

97
• Raise

• Context

o Impact on the New Hire Schedule

o Raises may help the District recruit High Quality Employees

o Raises affect Employee Morale (can be a negative or positive


depending on how administered; i.e. across the board or to
selected groups)

o Raises affect community perceptions

o 1% raise across the board costs approximately $1.4 million

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget


Resource Allocation Work Study-February 24, 2011

98
DFW Finance Survey: PAY & RAISE
2010-2011
2007-2008 2008-09 2009-10
Beginning Beginning Beginning Beginning Raise
Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher Non-
District Pay Pay Pay Pay Administrators Administrators

Irving $44,000 $46,400 $48,300 1 $49,200 2.00% 2.00%


1% of 1% of
Birdville $46,000 $47,000 $48,000 2 $48,500 midpoint midpoint

Northwest $46,322 $47,000 $47,500 3 $48,200 2.50% 2.50%

Mansfield $44,000 $45,800 $46,800 4 $47,500 2.00% 2.00%

Coppell $43,808 $45,370 $46,370 5 $47,155 2.00% 2.00%

C-FB $43,250 $45,000 $45,940 6 $46,741 2.50% 2.50%

Grand Prairie $43,500 $45,500 $46,500 7 $46,500 1.5%-2% 1.5%-2%

Mesquite $43,225 $45,000 $45,900 8 $46,300 1.50% 1.50%

Highland Park $44,000 $45,275 $46,055 9 $46,250 2.00% 2.00%

Plano $43,150 $44,250 $45,100 10 $46,150 2.50% 2.50%


2% of 2% of
Allen $42,625 $44,500 $45,000 11 $46,000 midpoint midpoint
2% of 2% of
Frisco $43,000 $44,500 $45,250 12 $46,000 Midpoint Midpoint

Richardson $42,850 $44,000 $45,100 13 $45,800 2.00% 2.00%

Cedar Hill $43,000 $44,500 $45,600 14 $45,600 $0 $0

Wylie $40,000 $43,000 $44,000 15 $45,500 3.00% 3.00%

Arlington $44,000 $44,500 $45,422 16 $45,422 $0 $0

Lewisville $43,700 $44,600 $44,900 17 $45,350 1.18% aver of 1.18%

Lancaster $42,100 $43,328 $44,428 18 $45,250 2.50% 2.50%


1% of 1% of
McKinney $43,000 $44,000 $44,900 19 $45,100 Midpoint Midpoint

Duncanville $41,000 $41,000 $44,000 20 $45,000 3.00% 3.00%

C-FB ISD 2011-2012 Budget


Resource Allocation Work Study-February 24, 2011

99

You might also like