Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I
n 2007 the author was invited to take 3. To what extent will climate change
part in an international workshop on bring about disruptive change in your
climate change and national security country/region of expertise? And will
hosted by the US National Intelligence disruptive change result in a
Council (NIC). The purpose of this breakdown or state failure?
workshop was to examine the impact of 4. Does your country/region of expertise
climate change on 49 countries of concern possess the latent reserves of social
to the US Government. resilience and ingenuity and/or
institutional capital that would enable it
Workshop participants were told that no
to meet the challenges of global
one US Government intelligence agency
climate change successfully?
had the means and resources to study the
5. Will global climate change make your
global impact of climate change on
country/region of expertise a
national security. This was why the
destination for migrants and refugees?
workshop—an unprecedented outreach by
Will neighbours resort to aggression to
the NIC—was organised. The workshop
seize resources and living space at a
was one of many inputs into the
time of environmental stress?
preparation of a US National Intelligence
6. Will your country/region of expertise
Assessment mandated by the US
be more or less open to engagement
Congress.
with external states to address the
Prior to the workshop, participants were impact of global climate change? And
given data on climate change that included will your country/region of expertise be
a range of estimates of aggregate more or less amenable to American
temperature vulnerability, agricultural influence and interests?
productivity impact, fresh water availability
For purposes of the workshop, national
and sea level rise in coastal zones.
security was defined broadly to include:
Participants were also provided with
direct impact on the US homeland and a
several specialist studies including the
US economic partner or ally; potential for
findings of the United Nation’s Fourth
humanitarian disaster that would call on
assessment report of the
U.S. resources; and short- and long-term
intergovernmental panel on climate
impact on the elements of national power
change. Staff members from Columbia
(geopolitical, military, economic or social
University’s Center for International Earth
cohesion).
Science Information Network (CIESIN)
later briefed workshop participants on the The NIC submitted its National intelligence
strengths and weaknesses of climate assessment on the national security
change data. implication for global climate change to
2030 to the US Congress in June 2008.
Each of the workshop participants was a
Although the assessment was directed
country or regional specialist. Each
towards an American audience, its general
participant was tasked with preparing and
findings have applicability to Southeast
presenting a scenario-based analysis for
Asia and to Australia’s national security
peer review that addressed six questions:
interests. For example, one of the National
1. What is the likely political, economic Intelligence Assessment’s (NIA) key
and social evolution of your observations was: ‘We assess that climate
country/region of expertise over the change alone is unlikely to trigger state
next two decades? failure in any state out to 2030, but the
2. What has been the response of your impacts will worsen existing problems—
country/region of expertise to such as poverty, social tensions,
environmental stress (domestic environmental degradation, ineffectual
instability and/or migration) in the leadership, and weak political institutions’
past? (p.5).Continued page 11>>