Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aaas. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Science.
http://www.jstor.org
A
ARTI LE s Xi
The population of the developing world is currently expanding at the unprecedented rate and many governmentswere reluctant to
of more than 800 million per decade, and despite anticipated reductions in growth during intrudein the sensitiveand privatematters
the 21 st century, its size is expected to increase from 4.3 billiontoday to 10.2 billionin 2100. of human reproductionand sexuality. In
Past efforts to curb this growth have almost exclusively focused on the implementation of addition, religious (mainly Catholic) and
family planning programs to provide contraceptive information, services, and supplies. conservativegroupsstronglyopposedbirth
These programs have been partiallysuccessful in reducing birthrates. Furtherinvestments control.
in them will have an additional but limited impact on population growth; therefore, other By the 1960s population growth had
policy options, in particularmeasures to reduce high demand for births and limitpopulation acceleratedto more than 2.5% a year, and
momentum, are needed. rates of growth were greaterthan 3% in
many developingcountries (6). The main
cause was a decline in the death rate as a
result of improved nutrition and public
The arithmetic of global population living standardsof additionalbillionsin the health measuressuch as immunization,an-
growth has become numbinglyfamiliar:1 decadesahead.As a consequence,in recent tibiotics, and better sanitation. Birth rates
billion in 1800, 2.5 billion in 1950, and5.5 decadesconcertedeffortsto curbpopulation remainedhigh in much of the developing
billion today. In the pastfourdecadesmore growthhave been undertakenin much of world. The threat of food shortagesin the
people have been addedto the globe than the developingworld. An estimated$4 to mid-1960s caused alarm about the race
in all of history before the middle of this $5 billion peryearis now spentby the world betweenfood supplyand populationgrowth
century. And growth continues unabated. on population programsin Africa, Asia, and providedan impetusfor strongergov-
The world'spopulationis now expandingat and Latin America (4). ernmentaction, increasedfundingfor pop-
the unprecedentedrate of nearly 1 billion In this article I review past approaches ulationprograms,and the establishmentin
per decade, and the United Nations and to populationpolicy and assessalternatives 1967 of the U.N. Fund for Population
the World Bank project an additional 6 availableto governmentsof the developing Activities (UNFPA).
billion inhabitantsby the end of the next countries.Such questionswere discussedat Governmentsconcernedaboutthe pros-
century(1, 2). Virtuallyall of this growthis the United Nations (U.N.) Conferenceon pects of large increasesin populationtypi-
expected to occur in Africa, Asia, and Environmentand Development(the "Earth cally responded by implementing family
Latin America;therefore,in this article I Summit")in Rio de Janeiroin 1992 and planning programsto provide information
focus on the developingworld. will be a focus at the U.N. International about and access to contraceptives.Newly
Concern about the adverse effects of Conference on Population and Develop- available contraceptivemethods, such as
populationgrowth on human welfarewas ment in September1994 in Cairo. the birth control pill and the intrauterine
expressednearly 200 yearsago by Thomas device, greatly facilitated the delivery of
Malthuswho concludedthat "the powerof Population Policy Since 1950 familyplanningservices.The rationalefor
populationis indefinitelygreaterthan the this approachwas largelyprovidedby re-
power in the earth to producesubsistence The potentialmagnitudeof the population searchon attitudestowardbirthcontroland
for man" (3). The result, he predicted, problembecameclearto demographers and on knowledge and use of contraception.
wouldbe increasingdeprivationand starva- a smallgroupof developmentplannersand Surveysof women of reproductiveage in
tion as exponentiallygrowingpopulations activistsin the early 1950s. Populationhad the 1960s found that manywomen wanted
outstrippedtheir food supply.Malthuswas, grownslowlyover previouscenturies,but a to limit familysize or space births but did
of course, not without his critics who be- large expansion was expected after 1950. not practice contraception (7, 8). This
lieved that increasesin human knowledge Although projectionsmade in 1951 by the informationreassuredpolicy-makersof the
and technologicalinnovationwouldenable newly created PopulationDivision of the acceptabilityof action programs.
humankindto provide rising standardsof U.N. considerablyunderestimatedthe ac- By the early 1970s concern about the
living for growingpopulations.This debate tual courseof growth(5), they led to strong adverseconsequencesof populationgrowth
has continued until today, with the opti- concern about adverse effects of a large had increased to the point that family
mists pointing to the notable successesin expansion of the human population on planningbecamea worldwidesocial move-
improvingthe welfareof much of human- social and economic development in the ment. Severalbooks as well as the exten-
kind, whereasthe neo-Malthusiansempha- developingworld. sive mediacoverageof the firstU.N. Con-
size the widespreadpoverty in the Third In response, organizationssuch as the ference on the Human Environmentheld
World and the many signs of stressin our InternationalPlanned ParenthoodFedera- in Stockholmin 1972 raisedglobal aware-
environment:air, water,and soil pollution; tion (to link familyplanningprogramsap- ness of populationand environmentissues.
globalwarming;and depletionof renewable pearingin many countries)and the Popu- This led to strongsupportfor action and a
and nonrenewableresources.Despite sharp lation Council (to serve as a scientific large increase in funding from the devel-
disagreementsaboutfutureprospects,there resourcefor the field)werecreatedin 1952. opedcountries,especiallythe United States
is broadagreementthat a reductionin rapid India became the firstcountryto adopt an (9). In addition, the health and human
populationgrowthin the developingworld officialpolicy to reducepopulationgrowth rightsrationalesforfamilyplanningbecame
will enhance the prospectsfor improved by promotingfamily planning. However, increasinglyimportant.Numerousgovern-
on the whole, progresswasslow initially, in ments initiated family planning programs
The author is director of the Research Division, The
Population Council, One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, partbecausebirthcontrolactivistswerenot even though this approachremainedpolit-
New York, NY 10017, USA. respected by the political establishment, ically sensitive and was a sourceof contro-
SCIENCE * VOL. 263 * 11 FEBRUARY 1994 771
versy. However, at the 1974 U.N.-spon- few (for example, China and Bangladesh), projected to more than double to 6.5
sored World PopulationConference, gov- the effect of familyplanningprogramspre- billion by 2100. Africa is projected to
ernmentsfromthe developingworldresist- dominates,whereasin many others socio- experience by far the largest relative
ed setting targetsfor loweringpopulation economic developmentis more important. growth:a nearlyfivefoldincreasefrom0.6
growthand insteadarguedfor a new inter- By 1990 most governmentsof develop- billion to 2.8 billion between 1990 and
nationaleconomicorderto stimulatedevel- ing countrieshad adoptedpoliciesto reduce 2100. Latin America is the smallestof the
opment. In the decade between the 1974 populationgrowth, and 85% of the Third three regions, and althoughits population
and 1984 World Populationconferences, World'spopulationnow lives in countries size is expected to double to 0.9 billion
governmentsthat were initially reluctant in which the government considers the over the same period, the absolutegrowth
came to accept the importanceof reducing fertilityrate too high (12). Most of these is substantiallysmaller than in Asia and
populationgrowthby implementingfamily countries have implementedfamily plan- Africa.
planningprograms(10). The Chinese gov- ning programs,but the effortsand resources The projected trend in population
ernment became so concerned about the devoted to them varywidely (13), and the growth shown in Fig. 2 indicates that we
consequencesof populationgrowththat it coverage and quality of services in many are now at the climaxof an unprecedented
adopteda controversialone-childpolicy in familyplanningprogramsneed to be greatly periodof populationexpansion(2). Overall
1978. improved. patternsof changein absoluteannualaddi-
The implementationof familyplanning tions to the populationof the developing
programshas in most countriesbeen a key Demographic Projections world (Fig. 2A) are similarto those in the
factor in assistingindividualsin changing rate of growth (Fig. 2B): At the beginning
their reproductivebehavior. In the devel- Despite rapidchanges in reproductivebe- of this century,growthwas low and it will
opingworldas a whole, the averagenumber havior during the past quarter century, againbe low at the end of the next century,
of children born per woman has declined population growth in the Third World but there is rapidgrowthduringthe inter-
from6.1 in the mid-1960sto 3.8 in 1990, continues at an unprecedentedpace (Fig. vening years. Absolute annual population
and the proportionof couplesusingcontra- 1). The population of the developing increments have been rising throughout
ception has risen sharply from less than worldis expected to growfrom4.1 in 1990 this century, and during the 1980s, 774
10%to 50% (6, 11). These averagescon- to 8.6 billion in 2050 and 10.2 billion in million people were added to the Third
ceal wide variationsamong regions (Table 2100, according to projections made by World (6). More importantly,growthwill
1). The most rapidchangeshave occurred the World Bank (2). In 1990 Asia (ex- likely exceed this level for the next three
in EastAsia wherefertilityhas declined to cluding Japan, Australia, and New decades, adding 830 million in the 1990s
2.3 birthsperwomanand contraceptiveuse Zealand)had 3 billion inhabitants,nearly and about the same again in the first two
is now at 750/o-a level usuallyfound in three quartersof the total of the develop- decades of the next century, before a de-
developedcountries.In contrast,reproduc- ing world, and the population there is cline is expectedto occuras fertilityreaches
tive behavior has changed little in sub- low levels.
SaharanAfrica, althoughthere arenotable Although the peak in absolute growth
exceptions(forexample,Botswana,Kenya, 10 - Developingworld will occur in the next three decades, the
South Africa, and Zimbabwe)wherefertil- rate of growth already reached its maxi-
ity declines are now under way. These mum in th-e late 1960s and has been
trends in reproductivebehavior are also . 8- Asia declining since then. A declining growth
attributableto rapid social and economic rate is consistent with a growingabsolute
development,which has reducedthe moti- increment in populationbecause the base
vation for largefamilies.The relativecon- 1990 population to which the growth rate ap-
tributionsof familyplanningprogramsand plies keeps growing. When the fact that
socioeconomicdevelopmentto fertilityde- 26 _ _ _ I
the growthrate had peakedbecamewidely
clines vary widely among countries. In a IL known in the late 1970s, some observers
~~~~~~~~~~Africa
concluded that we had defusedthe popu-
lation bomb (14). That conclusion is ob-
Table 1. Estimates of total fertilityrate and
contraceptiveprevalence rateforregionsof the 0 |I LatinAmerica viously incorrect because population will
developing world, from 1960 to 1965 and in 1950 2000 2050 2100 likely more than doublebefore stabilizing,
1990 (6, 11). Year but the declining growthrate is good news
and it is consistent with the claim that
Totalfer- Contracep- Fig. 1. Projections of population size for regions efforts to reduce population growth have
tive preva- of the developing world, 1990 to 2100 (2). had an impact.
tilityrate lence rate
tbiritys
pr (%of mar-
(birtsnpe
Country woa) ried-women) 3.0 Fig. 2. Estimatesand pro-
0, 100 A B1990 jections of (A) annualpop-
1960 1960 1990 2.5 - ulation increase and (B)
tn
to 1990 to 1990 5 80 l population growth rate of
1965 1965 the developing world (2,
1900 2000 2100 1 6).
Africa 6.8 6.1 5 17 g .260 Ye 1.5 Y
East Asia* 5.9 2.3 13 75
South Asiat 6.0 4.3 7 41
0C4
CL0 40- I.-
~~~~1.0
0.
LatinAmerica 6.0 3.5 14 61 0
All developing 6.1 3.8 9 50 20- 0.5-,
countries
0 0l
*ExcIudingJapan. tincluding
Southeast
andWest 1900 2000 2100 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100
Asia. Year Year
772 SCIENCE * VOL. 263 * 11 FEBRUARY 1994
ARTICLE
Future Policy Options family planning services; (iii) side effects ily planning programsby making a hypo-
and inconvenienceof contraceptivemeth- thetical projection of future population
The alreadydifficulttask of reducingpov- ods; (iv) disapprovalof husbands, family growth in which all unwanted fertility is
erty and bringingabout sustainabledevel- members,and others;and (v) cost of con- eliminatedafter1995. An estimated20%of
opmentin Africa,Asia, and LatinAmerica traceptivecommoditiesand travel. fertility in 1995-2000 will be unwanted
will be made even more difficultby the Several of these problemscan be ad- (19), and I assumed that the trend in
expected additionof 6 billion people over dressed if family planning programsare wantedfertilityin the futureis the sameas
the next century. Increasedeffortsto slow strengthenedby expandingcoverageto un- the trend in total fertilityprojectedby the
this populationexpansionare thereforede- servedor underservedareas,improvingser- World Bank, that is, a slow decline to
sirable.Three broadpolicy options can be vice quality, providingmore understand- replacementfertility in the middle of the
pursued. able contraceptiveinformationthroughthe next century (2). The results (Table 2)
1) Reduce unwanted pregnancies by media and in one-to-one communication imply that the elimination of unwanted
strengthening familyplanningprograms.The with service providers, and giving ready births after 1995 would reducepopulation
most direct way to bring about significant access to a wider variety of birth control growthand that the populationsize of the
furtherfertilitydeclinesis by the implemen- methods including abortion. In addition, developingworldwouldreachan estimated
tation of comprehensiveand high-quality existing programsneed to reach out to 7.5 billion in 2050 and 8.3 billion in 2100.
familyplanningprogramsin all countries. groupssuch as adolescentsand the sexually This projectionis considerablybelow the
Althoughpasteffortshave been substantial, active unmarriedwho are now often ex- standardprojection of the World Bank.
servicesare still poor and limited in cover- cluded. With the implementationof these The differencebetweenthe two projections
age in many countries. It is thereforenot measures, programscan substantiallyin- provides an estimate of the demographic
surprisingthat recentsurveysin developing crease the demand for contraceptionand impact of unwanted fertility: 1.1 billion
countries have found that many women reduceunmet need. (8.6 minus 7.5) in 2050 and 1.9 billion
who wish to delay or stop childbearingare As a consequenceof this unmetneed for (10.2 minus 8.3) in 2100. It should be
not practicingcontraception(15). Analysis birthcontrol, manywomenbearmorechil- emphasizedthat these projectionsare the-
of these findingssuggeststhat one in six drenthan they want. Approximatelyone in oretical upper limits on what can be
marriedwomenin the developingcountries fourbirthsin the developingworld(exclud- achieved. In practice,resourceconstraints,
outsideChina has an unmet need for con- ing China) is unwanted(17). In addition, imperfect technology, human error, and
traception-a total of about 100 million there are approximately25 million abor- reluctanceof governmentsto takeappropri-
women (16). Estimatesforunmarriedwom- tions annually,a largeproportionof which ate action pose limits on the impact of
en are not as readily available, but their take place under illegal or unsafe condi- family planning programs.Even in coun-
needs are no doubt also substantial.The tions, or both (18). Manyof these undesir- trieswith good programs,a significantpro-
unmet need for contraceptionis highest in able pregnanciescan be preventedif wom- portion of women are reluctant to adopt
countriesof sub-SaharanAfrica (averaging en are given greater control over their methods because of concerns about their
near 25%), but even in Asia and Latin sexualand reproductivelives. health and other side effectsand pressures
America, where services are much more The centralgoal of familyplanningpro- from spouses and other family members.
accessible,unmetneed levels of about 15% gramsis to providewomen and men with However, there is no doubt that improve-
are typicalin the countriesfor which data the informationand meansto control fully ments in the quantityand qualityof these
areavailable.These estimatesareconserva- their fertilityand thus eliminate mistimed programscan bringaboutsubstantialfuture
tive becausethey arelimitedto womenwho and unwantedpregnancies.In addition to reductions in fertility and population
are currentlynonusers.There are, in addi- directlybenefitingwomen and their fami- growth. In addition, strengthenedsupport
tion, substantialnumbersof contraceptive lies, the absenceof unwantedchildbearing for family planning will bring substantial
userswho are not satisfiedwith their cur- would have a substantialeffect on fertility social and health benefits to women and
rent method or who practicerelativelyin- andhence on populationgrowth.I estimat- children.
effectivemethodsthat put them at risk of ed the potentialdemographiceffectof fam- 2) Reducethe denmndfor largefamilies
contraceptivefailure. throughinvestmentsin humandevelopment.
The causesof this unmet need for con- Botswana
Although family planning programsnow
traceptioninclude (i) lack of knowledgeof Burundi Sub-Saharan claimthe bulkof the attentionandresources
Ghana Afric
contraceptivemethodsor sourcesof supply; Kenya of populationpolicy-makers,the potential
Liberia
(ii) limited access to and low quality of Mali effect of programsthat provide supplies,
Ondo State
Senegal services,andinformationis limitedto reduc-
Togo
Uganda ing the unmet need for contraception.Be-
Table 2. Projections of the population size of Zimbabwe
cause such programsare voluntary, they
the developing world with and without unwant- Egypt
ed births. Morocco cannotreducefertilitybelowthe level want-
N Africa
Tunisia
Indnnena _and Asia ed by couples (20). As a consequence,this
Projected
Sri Lanka
Thailand so-called"supply"approachcannot reduce
population size Bolivia
population growth to zero in countries
Projection (billions) in year Brazil
Colombia
where, on average,desiredfertilitystill ex-
Dominican Republic
Ecuador[an Latin ceeds two. This is apparentlythe case in
2050 2100 ElSalvador Ameica most developing countries. An extensive
Guatemala
Table 3. Simulated effect of delayed childbearing on population momentum if replacement fertility tween births. In general, however, the ef-
was reached in 1995. fect of a given incrementin birth spacing
on the meanage of childbearing(andhence
Average age at Population Population in 2100, Reduction on population momentum) is somewhat
childbe arngeamomentum* (billions) momentum only resulting from
childbearing (billions) delay (billions) smallerthan can be obtainedby the same
increment in the mean age at first birth,
No change 2.8 7.3 0 because spacing only affects subsequent
Increase of births.Lengtheningbirthintervalsalsopro-
2.5 years 2.2 6.7 0.6 vides substantialhealth benefitsformothers
5 years 1.6 6.1 1.2
and children; therefore, it should be en-
estimates includeeffect of futuremortalitydecline.
*Momentum couragedfor health as well as for demo-
graphicreasons.