.. ~:\. ~ C~’J- a. .

’"
;;;~>fS;:~~~,}\ot~~~o’
Registered File Disposal Form

~’, -:~:~~C’2::::"::::
.

:. >.-~ACc
, ,_ ~-
,~ -- \
,
I
TX\~
",",\..,,~_N~~)"-\\\\",,’
- \’-~ ,\ -
= <
-,<::JK’
,I
Dc., " ,
\
’
"’--’’’’:::’’’~
’C} -
-’,’’’’’’
I
: ;
,
- .Q
- , - , ~ -~S\i~ ’:-;E-
(~’i"<\"""<:
~n~o
- ’0- r~ri, ~_ ’.-
,-
IE~-;~\tD\~\\S
.._-"’~" -- . .--
MOD Form 262F
(Re\/ised 9/;)

’---J’
.
~
MAf-{KING cescriPI~~~~.........___
PHOrECl \l[::

Date of last enclosure:

(including caveats &

PART 1, DISPOSAL SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATION

(To be completed wher1 ttle ’ile is closed)
\ ,
<;}-c~~""S
r----.I
I
"ale closed
Q=
FOR DEFENCE I~JFO(EXP)-R USE 0 LY
~)~,____________.1,
i
1

v I - ----

.>c-=- -
--------- - ------i

Dr-strey after
ForNard 10 ;NFO{l:.xP)-f-:: after _
years

yesrs
~_J I _____
Cste ot 1 s1
.
reviev~_,,/""’-
\\’. ’-.-’<:~ ’0.\ ;’-.’-’
Date of 2nd review FOr\’/ard
--------’
DssTuclion DA1e

..
/’/

R8’/ieWE/S Reviewer s

.- -,. .,
/
No rocomrr81ldatior SignatL~ly;/ Signa1ure:

- .J
--
/
PART 2. BRANCH REVIEW //
(To be fully completed d time of fiI8c!osure:__._/
(De!ete as appropriate)
/
/ v’ !
a" Of no fU1i1er administrA1ive ’(siue and nnt worthy of perm< nert preservation Ji::ST={QY IMMEDIATI::.~Y (Hemember [la"TOP SECRET
and Codeword rna1erial cannot be destroyed locally and musi be forwd;"d::d 10 INFO(EXP)-R.
b. Ii: To be re1a:ned until1he end of the Ilea, _~_ for the follO’.ving reason{s).

v v
LEGAL

CONTRACTJAL
-
II
DEFENCE POLICY + OPERATIOI\’S

ORiGINAL COMMITTi::E PM;ERS

PPQ = 100
FINANCE//\UDIT

DIRECTORATE POLICY
I
~
,
MAJOFi EQUIP/v1I:;NT PHOJECT

OTHER (Speeiy) /’ FoJ

,:COfl1ir:ued o’Je,~leaf)
.
.
;

SW1A 2HB

e-mail:das-ufo-office@mod.uk
21 September 2005
the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
t~g
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

t~the of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
intended recipient is prohibited. North Wales Newspapers Ltd will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damage as a result of any virus
being passed on, or arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third
party. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.

2
 .
Flintshire Map Page 1 of 1
"

eM!.,.,-flintshire
Si.’,.yFfli. ’nt Home I Contact Us I Links I Jobs
You are here: Maps & Travel> Fllntshlre Map
I Community Directory

A ~ Z Services Ii] Flintshire Map

Your Council

Business

News & Events

Paying the Council

On~line Services

Learning & Education

Your Health

Your Leisure

Your Community

Young Flintshire

~.
Life Events

Information

Job Opportunities

Planning

~
-,<.......~ !m!1
~---.... DIrect
.
~~"t~;~~
.......
,ontint!!! "tJ’j;:
.t.........

1..6.
.,’

WWA

,..u,’
FL\IC

Flintshlre County Council, County Hall, Mold, Flintshlre CH7 6NB

01352752121 click here to contact us disclaimer

http://www.flintshire.gov.uklwebcontlnewrealweb.nsf/vwa_docref/CKYE5PZJ5D?op... 04/01/2005
 . Page 1 of1
’.

.
,

~:;-.,

"-,,.’
-
Dtnbighshire
. . -.
(1

\
,
I
..

http://www.visitflintshire.comlimages/flintmap.gif 04/01/2005
~~.f~~~ ~ ~,,

~"
VA 5

. ~~
Z Nt -
Hit (N
\

t ()IV C
()J
\LJ
(

c9
ry
t)
~K ~V\ 8p-v^~~19~"l~
k De-~~vLLrc.c!-
-~ lifR~~~_
,1-00I!. 0,I :J. " r’^i^..{ &(b
~I

W ~
ofM 1
ri’’K

S’w\ ft :J..fLl.
. Our version of events begins at 1900 hrs on the evening
November 1990 with
confirmed that, at
reports
that
at
time
Rheindahlen
two of our
of a
Phantom
’sonic boom’.
aircraft were
of 5
We

over Germany,
carrying out practice intercepts at a very high level
under positive radar control and did not fly supersonic.
a
simultaneously, the crew of one of the Phantom aircraft reported
described as a large formation of aircraft all in
UFO sighting,
the Battle of
reheat in finger formation (similar to that seen in
disappearing to the north. The crews gave chase,
Britain films)
but did not establish further visual or radar contact. Separately,
aircraft returning at high level from the United
one of our Tornado
Kingdom saw an array of red lights in the sky and, similarly,
investigated to no avail. subsequently, the NATO Air Defence
organization reported that there were several unidentified high
in the same area
speed contacts during the course of that evening
border of Germany/Southern Belgium) as the sightings.
(western

We shall probably never know exactly what our crews saw or,
our people on the ground heard. Some days later you will be
interested to learn that a Chinese satellite re-entered the
atmosphere over North west Europe at about the same time on 5
November 1990. I must, however, also point out that the
meteorological conditions prevailing at the time were perfect for
~he propagation of the phenomenon known as anaprop which during
severe atmospheric temperature inversion trap particles in the
atmosphere which speckle on radar and produce spurious radar
symbols known as angels.
 .
AlRMISS REPORT No. 2195
,-~~.,.
I V ,r;(}hblO

DatelTime.’ 061648Jan
Position, N5318 W0200
NIGHT

(8NM SE Manchester Apt)

-t" -
~~
Airspace MTMA Class: A I:!
REporting Aircraft Reported Aircraft
Type: B737 Un traced
Operator: CAT
Alt/FI.- .j,
4000 ft
(QNH1027 mb) . .. .
. .,
"

Weatber YMC CLAC

Visibility, 10 km+

PABr A. SUMMAtn’OF INFORMAnON 1 ORTED TO JAS

’I’:bf!: B1 7 PII.OT reports.that lJe was over the Pennines, about 8 <:!T 9 NM SE of Manchester Airport,
at 4000 ft, while being radar : croretl by Manchester radar on 119k He was flying at 180..210
kt on a
N heading and squawking 5734 with’Mo C selected. Although it was dark,visibililY )Vas over 10 Ian
with a fairly strong NW wind (340/30). While flying JUSt above the tops of some ragged Cu both he
and the first officer saw a lighted (seeJAS notes) object fly down the RH side of the ac at high speed
from the opposite direction. He was able to track the object through the RH windscreen and side
window, having it in sight for a total of about 2 seconds. There was no apparent sound or wake. The
first offiC instinctively ’ducked’as it went by.
. The first officer reports that .rus
attention, in!ti~y
focused on the
diverted to something in his peripheral vision. He looked up in ti .
hield !no front of him, was
ea d rkobject paSS down
the right hand side of the ac at high s eedi it.was wedge-Sllape9 with what could have been.a black
stripe down the side. He estimated the object’s slae as someWhere between ’that of a light ac and a
]etstream, though he emphasises that this is pure speculation, It made 11.0 attempt to deviate from its
course and no sound was heard or wake felt. He felt certain that what he saw was a solid object not ~
a bird, I>>II00n or kite.

MANCHESTER ATe:; reports that the B737 was being radar vectored from Dayn<: to the ILS for RW 24
when the pilot reported a lighted obje passing close by above and in the o site direction. There
was no known traffic in the vl.cinilY at the time and no .radar contacts were seen.

JAS Note (1): Tele hone conversa ons sUDsequently took place WIth both the’captain and ’the first
officer. Tae captain remained convinc<:;d thai the object was its-elf1
. Allbough he could not
J;l,e
determine a definite pattern, .des (ibed it as having a number of small white lights, rather like a
Christmas tree. He confirmed the high speed of the object, and tbough unable to estimate its
distance, said he felt it was very close. Following the incident, the captain and first officer
independently drew what they had seen, both agreeing about the shape but differing in their
opinions about the lighting aspects, The first officer felt that the object was illuminated by their
landing lights, which at that stage were switched on. He was unable to assess Its distanC, other than
to say that he involuntarily ’du ked’, so it must have appeared to him to have been very close, He
was entirely convinced, as was the .captain, that what they had seen was a solid bject and not a Met
phenomenon, balloon, or any other craft with which they were ’familiar; or a Stealth ae, which he had
himself seen and which he feels he would have reeognised.

27
. .~",~-_..~--.,.,.-,---~

]AS Note (2): Despite exhaustive investigations the reported object remains untraced. A replay of the
Clee radar shows a number of secondary contacts, including the subject B737, being radar sequenced
in the Manchester TMA and zone. The B737 tracks over two almOSt stationary primary contacts just N
of Leek on a NW heading while descending through FL 7(H0. On entering the Manchester
passing FL 50,it is vectored right Onto about 040’, and continues to descend on a NE track along the
TMA,
E boundary of the Manchester TMA to Within 0.75NM of the aventry CTA, where the base of CAS is
FL 45. At this point, passing 3600 Mode C,the ac is turned onto a L base for RW 24 as part of a busy
sequence of inbound ac, At no time during this downWind leg is any other radar contact seen in the
vicinity. An extract from the RT recording on 119.4,
which shows that the B737 was given descent
clearance to 4000 at 1845:30,follows:

From:
B737 (1848)- ’C/s we just’had something go down the RHS just above us very fast.’
-
Manchestet ’Well,there’s nothing seen on radar. Was it er an ad’
- ’Well,it had lights, it went d the starb side very,qu;<:k.’
B737
Manchester
-
- ~d above you?’
’er,just slghrly above us, yeah.’
B737
-
Manchester ’Keep an eye out for something, er, I can’t see anything at all at the moment SO,et,
must have, er, been very fast or gone down very quickly after it passed you 1 think.’
B737 - ’OK.Well, there you,go!’
The possibility that the’,obje<:t might have been a hang glid~r, paraglio;h:;r or microlight was
investigated, but aD the,operating authorities, without exception, agreed thanbis was emdy
unlikely explanation, for various reasons, but mainly because none of these activities,takes pla<:e at
night. In addition, there are the obviou$ hliZaI’ds ’Of flying in the(lark,Jrom high ground/(the
this area along the Pennine ridge range from 1690 to OYer 2000 ft), strong Wi11ds, and b~use
pea~ in
,these
aircraft are unlit. ]AS also explored the possibility of military activity, but could fmdno evidence in
support of this from any official SGUoce. In any case, it seems most unlikely that such a flight would
have been conducted in CAS and so dose to a busy international airport. Because of the B737’s
proximity to uncontrolled airspace to the E of Manchester during the downwind leg, which covers the

cO pI~
airmiss period, the possibility of unknown military or civil activity in the adjacent FIR cannot be
diseounted. ’amVever,theliklibood of such activity escapit]g detection is remote, as the
area is well served by several ,radars and any movements at the levels .
in qUestion would almost
certainly have generated a radar response.

PART 8: SUMMARv OF TREWOUlNG GROUP’S DISCt)’SSIONS

Information available to theWorking Group induded reports from the pilot of the 8737, trans<:ripts of
the relevant RT frequencies, a video recording, and reportS from the air traffic controllers involved..
"

The Group were anxious to emphasise that this repon, submitted by two responsible airline pilots,
was considered seriously and they wished to corrunend the pilots for. their courage in submitting it,
and their company, whose enlightened attitude made it possible. ReportS such as these are often the
object of derision, but the Group hopes that this example will e!,!courage pilots who experience
unu$ual sightings to report them Without fear of ridicule. It was quickly realised by aU members that,
because of its unusual nature, they could only theorise on the possibilities on e normal avenues of
investigation had been explored. There is no doubt that the pilots both saw an obj and that it was
of sufficient significance to prompt an airmiss repon. Unfonumu:ely, the nature and identity of this
object remains unknown. To speculate about extra-terrestrial activity, fascinating though it may be, is
not Within the Group’s remit and must be left to those whose interest lies in that field. It is probably
true to say, however, that almost all unusual sightings can be attributed to a wide range of well known

28
.
.
natural phenomena. There are, of course, a few which defy explanation and thus fuel the
of those wh are convinced that there is ’something going on’ out there. Usually
is accompanied by a rash of ground sightings in the same geographic area; in this
known, there were no other reports and therefore the incident has to be reviewed incase,
imagination
activity of this kind
as far as is
isolation, with
no other witnesses, The resources normally available when investigating 3.irmisses are pilots’
reports,
corroborated by radar and RT recordings. Often these will provide all the clues
case there is no ’reported pilot’, and radar recordings do not show any unknown necesSary, but in this
of a radar contact is not necessarily ’unusual if weather suppressors are in
contacts. The lack
use on
particularly if the object generates a poor radar response, In these .conditions the radar the radar,
a non-transponding (primary)COntact as weather, and therefore disregards it, Enquiriescan interpret
into military
activity did not reveal any ac in the,area at the time, and it was considered inconceivable that such
activiry would take place sO close to a busy airport without some sort of pnor notification. Members
put fOrward other suggestions, such as a large model aircraft or a commercially operated
remotely
- - the.
controlled craft, such as those which are used for survey or photOgrphic
prevailing conditions darkness, high ground, strong NW wind, and
international airport
work.
Considering the
the’
proximity of a major
Group feJt that this kind of activity, together with the hang
ty.
glider/microlight theory, could not be regarded as a realistic possibil As was pointed out one
member, however, the extreme actions of a fooJ ardy individual cannot be entirely
there remains, therefore, the possibility’th t someone, perhaps in a
by
ruled out and
microlight ac (which most
accurately fits the shape described), had defied the conditions d got airborne. Fttrther
the microlight experts on this idea hig lighi:ed its extreme talkS with
and darkness would have rendered such a Bight almost suicidal.
improbability; the strong’ wind, te:rr

"
.. Having debated the various hypotheses at length the Group concluded that, in the
firm evidence which could identify or explain this object, it was not possible to assess absence of any
or the risk by any of the normal criteria applicable to airmiss reports, T e incident either the cause
unresolved. therefore remains

PART c, ASS:SSMBNT OF RlSJrAl’ CAUSE

~gretJ"ofRisk: Unassessable’
Cause; Unassessable

19

, , ,~ "..,
.
.
REPORT OF AN UNEXPLAINED AERIAL SIGHTING

1. ..
Date and time of sighting.
(Duration of sighting.)
15 January 2005
23.15L
v

2. Description of object. Just said it was a flying saucer.

(Noofobjects, size, shape, colour,
brightness, noise.)

3. Exact position of observer. Not given.

Geographical location.
(lodoorsJoutdoors,
stationary/moving.)

4. How object was observed. Not given.

(Naked eye, binoculars, other
optical device, camera or
camcorder.)

5. Direction in which object was Not given.

rust seen.
(Alandmark may be more helpful
than a roughly estimated bearing.)

6. Approximate distance. Not given.

7. Movements and speed. Not given.

(side to side, up or down,
constant, moving fast, slow)

8. Weather conditions during Not given.

observation.
(cloudy,haze, mist, clear)

1
.
81 I was wondering if you have received any reports to the
department of the phenomena which I have detailed above
or any other reports of strange lights or craft in the
skies over the South Staffordshire area in general but
particularly the Cannock, Rugeley and Lichfield areas for
("’)\. the last three years and if so, would it be possible to
\/)
send me a copy of any of the information which you hold
where this is possible.

As I mentioned above, locally, the most commonly reported

craft seen in the skies which people cannot readily
identify are these triangular shaped craft/vehicles,
which have also made their presence felt nationally and
internationally. This phenomenon is an area of study
which I have become very much involved in over the past
year or so.

It is my belief from the research that I have undertaken

that a large majority of these sightings of triangular
platforms in our skies are nothing more than
misidentified ’terrestrial’ phenomena such as newly
developed military technologies, stealth aircraft and
misidentified commercial aircraft. Indeed, I have just
begun the initial stages of research to show that from my
own observations, the landing light configuration of
commercial jet aircraft when seen at night on an aircraft
in a steep banking turn are identical to many of the
pieces of footage I have seen of purported
’extraterrestrial’ flying triangle craft. Having said
that however, there still remain some reports of these
craft which seem to defy what I would call an ’earthly’
explanation simply through the way the behave and the
characteristics they display which do not fit in with the
technology and physics that we understand. That is,
though, to say that they can’t be explained.
To assist me with my research into this fascinating area

( of Ufology, I was wondering if you have any information

which may be of use. What information or statistics, if
any do you hold on sightings of this type of phenomenon.
NcM.L
What is the Ministry’s (or the departments) view on these
sightings being new technologies and/or stealth aircraft
(can you comment on this?) although if they are new or
existing military aircraft surely the pilots would be
invited not to fly over restricted and sensitive
locations such as nuclear power stations as some of these
craft have been observed doing or not to fly in direct
conflict with civil airliners in some of the busiest
airspace in the UK, close to one of our busiest airports
(the infamous incident at Manchester Airport where a

Page 2 of 3
-express
"; ."

108311.......
!
- -
’’’.-’
Cannock & Rugeley

CIa..... WIdn..day,November 3,2004

&. .
." w ~ _ "’

.
~ ,1

.~.-_0
,

~ " -’

-iE en
,
.’}

By Andr FUchanIeon "

.
Video footage and photographs which show
’tJF

IL I --y.h_~ - ~ 0--~_.
over Cannock Chase and surrounding areu during

...
the summer have been released

i" The footage,from Stdonlahire UFO Oroap,ehow a number ofinci.-

delltII cauon camera over the Cannock CIiaIre area durin&"August 7

en’1u
...,
:. .> CD .~I
.Caa_CM.........
_vity_
j ! 8Dd8tbia,One IhowaiUilftJ’diecah~..d. afie1inPerton,
of"....t
W show
whiCh were captured in Heath
atra:DOVeJ
Milford SheD

IIan7
&Juj
o0
~"""’J’.1
of

_
baUs
of I!tIIII’ordIIIf UFO
ia
"""ovw UFO

.~. . 0IIJIIrtI-.-’"co_"fIop.’
.lIoIdial_
Cbut

__
wIdah
TIle ~""jlllt bOon
I

~:2CD,.1
It.

~~~.
to UFO

’s en .~"""""’Ja_
. . . . . ,.
world
MrAIIoB00III1bonbodll’&
oativitY

ica;:j .I
. f
Iiadbellhl1_

j-.c..I
.~
.ADea-.J.
.""......11Io_
.
~~ -.-CIIUo. Mr I

CD 0, ofupt ...
.....-nhcrnrilw098l’c.’\IIItw
triaDJu)ar
boIIo
ovwlbo ChaM j
llIopod UFO
.
"

..._ _OP_ _ .-_

. ~. .. . _
. . ~."’1IicL
!IPIot~
Mr "CaaIIoc6:
".
ChaM II """
.
of ilia
,"",Id’.

_---.
m t
:E III uro aoid
!IoIIpoIa

....a..c brcu to Ibo

’Th.wwId~of 11M
.

.5:.

C)~
’J:: .
’III .
’

=of~,~_
..:.wbo.....r.-..___ia-.....
tared by
pabllOllAupot 7 aad8111i1
"TIle

I~ ;:
;~::I
’t~ 0 ._1
.’
.

==
_ ~
.’,.00

...c
,j ~ "It RwIi<<I Iw
tIJ wbot ...
Tllefbolaae_.-.od
Iboftlm.
loft

It..,.;.!
taIk:4
_8Iofrord~Hol~ UFO
&aid II WaoIoD ,
i

J2 "

- .,
.. ..
"
 .
. . ’. ’. . :,.,. .:~. ,.-. ~1"oI; -.,
1
~.
:t.:,(

. .~
L:,
Lt }) q~O
u
(LIIlIWY JU(1p. )004)
’.1

"
~~.
..~.~
.’"
Camera Tel- 01543 258523 2 p

~hs:se~ty. .1,’ .~ft~~:~

captures

overcl .
..
.
r .~!!’.’!’,
be balllightinc, wl
IIII&urBl pi>eDw But has
fen!m.
.~ we tbia ftdeoiape
ly ucitoid.

. . . . . . . . . .bu__
t IIO
_ cathedral
....w-
=,~~j bmer....... I
of
oII:iee oftor
~
. oV-f. . . . . . . Md......
INdiDII UFO tIIpIrt has
told ’l’bo F.t be
A
the Li<IdieId
<aptur video
*_1I&hi
Som

mcwe a
a
like tbia Ia doee

iD.
real-
II Iiappoo YfIrT of\eII,’-
ly."Mr AIleD oaid the IIi
bi ah iIie
city. He oanumber
the
of di-

.-Islrisqulai-
tioDo
the city, At
to
one point the :
gI--...d
_~ _~- _ ....~ ~
Graham AIloa,Groupof i recor<IiiII zoomsbee a
the object
IiIape at its !
said a
reoomIed.
UJ’O
.,;q
StaI’lordIhiN noidaDt b;,’;t lag
wI_
00IItra,
"1’be
. . . ..-lb.
abov. the
.,
object I1118tiu1r
Li
tbia
..~
buu eu\ier
’-<1 I
011 f die diItrict,
h
Putof
a
Ibougbt then W8I
be sddecL
"W.haw deoene’
~frum
011
eIiw theOOlltraofthe ball.
of.dmnar
oil_the...
ib

~
-- -""’t; Jbre_
AIleD. aDd 011 ofthe", t.be t.bIDg
Mr who bu baeD .. ’.
of the
UJ’O aotinty for
expertAI on
a
I. . . . . ..-dinI
....U
. Md that
b-:SU
-:y . . . ._It..-..zeDe...
what. we
’ It Ia a

. . . . . u ,
decade,oaid the tbo1Ie4Jt Ia tbia

. ’
~.. bu..... ...
amonr the
Tbe
eaitU be

. .’"1’bia,. ."W.. t. ,IiIddi..a,. wholelie told Tbeof

would
acIted
Mr AIleD Mid the pI
the
the IDcidomt after It b
8I18I,ysed,
Of
we are
,

I
I
.’

-
~. . . ’-<1_. . ....... )

-=: ~
Nn Ia
bGet
Poel bad a
IigbU"", .t the
otertoflutmont.b&v..._
pie from Ud>/ieId. SIumIIoDe All of them

:=
iDd

ofa’bue.
the

’J
:=d.e .,..
alae
,

,
,...j
 ,. More sky ’triangles’ reported
I Stealth bombers
-,
,
-,
-.!

~
)
~. -

J
over the Chase? -m"
Tbe
by"
eki_
what’. _
__
)’iDc
d~ed ~
~
LocIdIJ
X.FiI_.,. . 1’)’ ....1IIeedof
our
""Hed_ford. .
.,
Dereace spokesman
.
And yeoterday a Minioby of
10 bt> drawn on wheth<’r the
.,.;ng man. . . . . .
.

lCi.r. lookinR aircraft aft’eat-

former RAF
the
camp nearby.OJ
There are twn
Iineo,
alterna~
theories for the trian lll’
enA being put forward

_
oul over
week
ti... tri......
with

1aMI a. .r.:
bve beeD a
there
ftood of
--
’t i

~
_.....n . -WI _
,"
of I

~ _
Stam. Gro....
craft.
.hire UFO
a. .
RuCi:.;.
8heJu1oaB. Bumtwood
. .. .. M.ot. .oIa
bao ....eived iafo frmia

. m.e-’do "(exereia..
........lIlall:.. ’...
C an Graham AIIoft
"E..h
told The Post:
.imilar deocript oftwo
_lor-shaped
J!ve a
craft yi"l
lri- doi.... . r.,ardin,
OIIr
commenl on whal the US are .
UFO -...t.11111: .
It blth<’ lalaot technoJomr
10 bt> developed al the
18w. ailent
around
stmighl at
6,3Opm on JanlW7
ad movements.
Acclaimed UFO ......reher rnearch centre in Whaton,
Blaekpool. "**
""" read- Inmc Bolt .till thinks the tri.
.

..
16,’ It ia the of
Only leat a Post
or told or her oIooe cncoun"’"
wnh the triangubu craft. at
oaJllIar objPeto could be from
oaOther world, ~ent
lA’ _",",ct-
enjJia,’: a claim thai
their ow-a crafts from
are

. . . ." you’verash
- "’ ovidenceaura.
She lIid: ’On past
to 11.1 U 0 debria.

=. ~ned
P tal Pool an area that baa there it ia

~ cur-
become a hotbed of UFO not something of
aetivity. And [reI\(’ ia not aurpriaed
Jlow~.
....wer eYideaee the
to the riddle not
there’s been a glut of unex-
The UFO group is
aetivily in lhe Pottal
has,. red I area, Two renlly interviewing the lat.
Y<"I""
at......gth.
be in the stara
est
a
of UFO spotters.
,. petrifird woman motorist
With Will’ eJouda pthertac, daimacl two large
new speei.’ ahelle" have of l::\hl seemod to
been ...natrncled at one "cate: 4UP’ with her vr ie .
Home Counti... RAF bale to
hou.e
Ire..
balbo
~I",i., stra’W:
seen IOI118Iting
in the skies
us Stealth bombero lita aU the crileria for para- tact e Post on 01543
added: "Pottal Pool
con- .’

258523.

L
..ri
baa appeared in I!>o daily

..
normal activity. Th(>I"(I’8 the

_:If’ ..

ARTICLE FROM:
The Rugeley Post .
L.- . , .
Thursday 6th February 2003
Page 11
 . .

_~
.. I.

. ,.. J
.
~
.~
~ ~,’~
.
/1’,.. .
5

Page . I ~-
) I

2003 war’ ’~-:.’"- .. .~

~ bombers .-.
J

-.
Februtuy
FQ Mi. 13th
. _ C h _.
,.,-".- ’-rd bomera 1.!’0 "I._DwhatbeUSr . ine a.~_id
~ . b re~", 5’-
Ionc-hed h*", -rosing -." . g
psoemoele
for
~ .
n
N81’." EDliner usi,!1
war
saId. . whn lota be I
10III

do refusad t\Ibjo<&
’

ARTICLE Thursday loud are 10 he here. mst Group.the

a
r u n n b i .b e n
SoI\ware the GuIfW. have"’ ’ne pea baI.of eye" <an Defence aourre,
A up
a that
said. and

.air- -.I
I
V I . , o n , they Ellis the
Post KevIn ogvoerner-old Bntaia the.fin&Saucb Ithimee,:be~Id theStaolDrnybire th~r.w iatiated them: Ministry we k over
.~la.hpetdh"’.
I
Mr on
’D atlOn I
<it
!
41.

are. 25-ybeliev~m Gulf",Before bl!" ’! they EDI8 the lutainft

S!"’\lti! ID 00
l:FO.

theyThe the "But Sa Mrfrom baYe..’"1’0 like Thedrawn

th.s
The’Rugel y ’
had
a
a

p r e a .
_ l
wtheery wer 8Dd iaofDtMd
and war have TheorRugel y war ghtingaUFO

e u of ,.

I i o d J e

~
enthuai-

)
"UFOs
Stealth
iprepa’ring the Jd.teGb Ind’fa sightnp prof area u_lainod driVing The
’Multi-mDloa
UliDe

are for
bombers
Llcbfteld

over

Butre1y claimed. pI._ .i1np_a a.-

t r i _
nI
l . s
Iold

pound wlt- riatoDftaoi .er the theoriea. are whiledbeolni’vt ".’

III

h a p e d
t _ n o
or over Iraq.,
a
craA

. US
ill

OD
s

beli ved Shenstone .eruesinaat ck . any

eyedti:;" to
EaglPoet am! tion The
an
in
a
includine was

the

"aiminga<tiv ’y,

alien
witnesacl
UFOs: FI-17.
lOr <nft the alt theythe
"I
OYer
fly
I

but

I IEms.Mike
saw night Shape
I

8’iatian what all.1’1-17

think
military’1 a
at a
was ’II
It
madecnA
4 . .
. .
 - "’. .

.;’,~Ui=.’,:’~’," u.-,. "

3.-’~".- I "’,i!.
":"~’

.c
,’ ’t’

.
~"-,:
,i;’[c";!
i .~"ijrR

;".ro~ MIi_1<. MJiIS.

F:" "i"
rl

\I,.p’

A~
’.J ., Ii
"! i
’. ’~ Iii
.. Airspace)

(Lower

Staff la Avenue
Policy
Air Defence
Building
of &
Of
6/73 Northumberland 5BP
Directorate Operations Metropole
Ministry LONDON
Room WC2N