You are on page 1of 1

I I6A

Earth retaining structures completion. Observation~ and measurements pro,,,.' that t n c


~all is stable against floods. The earth pressure is sho~n to he
See also. 863164. 863168. 863218. 863219 slightly higher than the designed ~a!u¢

863304 863309
Use of probability theory to assess the safety of propped Research on static earth pressure on retaining walls
embedded cantilever retaining walls Fukuoka. M; Imamura. Y
Smith, G N Proc 6th Budapest Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Geotechnique V35, ,V4. Dec 1985. P451-460 Foundation Engineering,Budapest, 2-5 October 1984 P495-
500. Publ Budapest. Akademiai Kia~b,. t984
The use of the probability theory in the assessment of the
reliability of a propped embedded cantilever retaining wall is Earth pressure of backfill was measured during and after the
described. The method of analysis is a numerical one and construction of a 6m high, ver.,, rigid L-shaped retaining wall.
involves an iterative procedure by which the reliability index No movements of the wall v, ere observed. Measured earth
of the system is evaluated. Knowing the reliability index, a pressure was slightly larger than the Coulomb earth pressure
nominal value of the probability of failure of the structure can but increased significantly with rain~ater percolation. This is
be obtained. It is shown that a powerful feature of the probably due to changes in soil properties. A stone block
probability approach is that, whereas the four methods gener- !uncemented) retaining wall, 4m high, had a ~er~ small earth
ally used to determine the factor of safety, F, of a propped pressure at rest, and collapsed similarly to a sliding failure in
embedded wall give four different F values, the same four an unretained slope. It is concluded that design earth pressures
methods all give the same value of reliability index. Auth. on retaining walls should be determined by case records.
rather than old earth pressure theories.
863305
Specification for cast in place concrete diaphragm walling 863310
Ground Engng VI8, ,V6, Sept 1985, PI l-19 Precast prestressed concrete retaining wall designed by a new
method of earth pressure estimation
863306 Fukuoka. M: Nakagawa, H
First 'Stent Wall' installed at Kingston upon Thames Proc 6th Budapest Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Ground Engng VI8. N7, Oct 1985. P27-31 Foundation Engineering,Budapest, 2-5 October 1984 P501-
506. Publ Budapest. Akademiai Kiado. 1984
A novel retaining wall construction method has had its first
contract application in a car park development at Kingston A precast, prestressed concrete retaining wall with a curved
upon Thames. It is the 'Stem Wall" secant pile wall, the princi- surface is described. It was designed after analysis of accumu-
ple of which is to use contiguous concrete male piles secanted lated data from many vertical and inclined retaining walls.
into female bentonite/cement/p.f.a piles. An account of the Model tests were first performed, which showed bending
method, construction of the concrete piles and tests carried moments at the bottom of a curved wall to be larger than for a
out is presented. straight one. This was overcome by designing a shelf into the
wall. Stability analysis using Taylor's friction circle showed
863307 the curved wall to be more stable than the straight one. In
Failure of an anchored shoetpile bulkhead addition, the curved walls increase sight distance, and conse-
LaGatta, D P; Shields,D R quently safety, of roads.
Proc International Conference on Case Histories in
Geotechnical Engineering, R oila, :~lissouri, 6-11 May 1984 863311
VI, P393-399. Publ St Louis: Geotechnical Engineering, 1984 Interaction between flexible sheet piling and eohesionless soil
Kuralowicz, Z; Tejchman, A
An anchored steel sheet pile bulkhead was constructed in soft Proc 6tb Budapest Conference on Soil 114echam'cs and
organic silt and clay. The bulkhead failed when the anchors Foundation Engineering,kdapest, 2-5 October I984 P527-
ruptured during dredging in front of the bulkhead. The con- 533. Publ Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 1984
struction and failure of the bulkhead are described. Analyses
were performed to investigate the cause of the failure. The Results of model tests on flexible sheet piling in a cohesionless
major factors which contributed to the failure were: (I) failure soil analogue are presented. The deformation and stress distri-
to design for the lowest tide condition; (2) use of design soil bution along the piling were measured for piles of different
strengths which were too high; (3) prestressing of the anchor flexibilities for the cases of backfilled and open excavations.
system which resulted in increased anchor loading due to soil Slip lines and plastic zones in the soil at limit equilibrium were
arching; and (4) bending stresses induced in the anchors by observed. Results were compared with those for a rigid wall. A
settlement and equipment loading. Particular emphasis is new analytical method to calculate earth pressures for flexible
placed on the effects of soil arching on the anchor loading. sheet piling is proposed.
Auth.
863312
863308 Definitive retaining wall structures
Anchor slab retaining wall stands overtOl~ng flood Lakatos, E; Encsy. B; Voros, J
Wang, Z L; Wu, X M; Zhang, Z S Proc 6tb Bm~pcst Conference on Soil Meckanics and
Proc International Conference on Case Histories in Foundation Et~gineering,~dape st , 2-5 October 1984 P535-
Geotecknical Engineering, Rolla, ~4issouri, 6-11 May 1984 544. Publ Budapest. Akademiai Kiado. 1984
VI, P401-404. Publ St Louis." Geotechnical Engineering. 1984 Requirements to cut materials and labour costs have led to the
An anchor slab retaining wall, able to stand seasonal overtop- adoption of new design practices for retaining walls in Hun-
ping floods, was constructed in 1980 beside a river in Fukien gary. Three solutions are described. The "crust packet' (a
Province, China. Stresses and deformations have been moni- braced steel box unit. concreted on one or both sides) can be
tored during the mean water level and flood seasons since its used in the production of underground structures or bridge

C 1986 Pergamon Press Ltd. Reproduction not permitted

You might also like