Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
SUMMARY
Global Outlook: Positive but Fragile
We align with the broad projections that emerging and frontier markets would
remain drivers of global growth even as advanced economies focus on debt,
deleveraging and fiscal consolidation (see our report titled Underlying
Assumptions – 2011 Outlook dated January 4, 2011). Notwithstanding the
positives of the emerging markets, it is important to watch out for rising
inflationary threats on the back of increasing commodities and energy prices.
January 2011 2
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 3
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Sector Outlook
Banking Sector: Risk gives way, eyes on fundamentals
We are overtly upbeat on 2011 earnings, as the key drags on growth fizzle
out. Aside our modest outlook on loan growth which is expected to enliven
interest income as well as fee and commission books, the steady uptick in the
overall yield environment will provide support for appreciable growth in FY’11
earnings over 2010 levels. Our top calls in the sector are ZENITHBANK,
ACCESS and FIRSTBANK. These three banks have an expected return of 27%,
25% and 17% respectively.
January 2011 4
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Our Bull case estimate for the equity market performance rises 606
bps above our base case scenario to 24%. Again the banks will lead with
a 40% return, Petroleum Marketing and Consumer sectors will follow with 25%
and 19% respectively. The Infrastructure sector will post 18% return, while
Insurance counters will return 10%.
Our Bear case estimate sees equities returning 10% for the year. This
scenario forecasts banks adding 25%, the Petroleum Marketing and Consumer
sectors posting gains of 10% and 6% respectively, while the Infrastructure
and Insurance sectors will shed 4% and 5% respectively.
Given the expected hyperactivity in local Bond issuances by AMCON and the
federal government early in the year, we expect the bond market to continue
to attract capital flows as bond yields would trend higher in 2011, hence
shaving off, only slightly though, some of the potential investments in equities.
Stronger still, the uncertainty in the Nigerian Political environment might delay
significant investments in the capital markets further into the year as
investors exhibit caution over the outcome of the elections.
January 2011 5
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
CONTENTS
Nigeria ...................................................................................................8
Disclosure........................................................................................... 165
January 2011 6
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
6 5.0
5 4.5
4 4.0
3 3.5
2 3.0
1
2.5
0
2.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011F
Q1'11 Q2'11 Q3'11 Q4'11
January 2011 7
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Nigeria
January 2011 8
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 9
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
... which was out of sync with the CBN’s restrictive policy
January 2011 10
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 11
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Six Presidential candidates A host of factors in Nigeria, including reforms across various sectors of the
emerged after the primaries; the economy, remain hinged on the outcome of the April polls. In our January
contest is now pitched between 2011 note, “Underlying Assumptions – 2011 Outlook”, we reviewed the
either PDP and other parties, or political terrain and gave 3 scenarios prior to the conclusion of the Presidential
PDP and a coalition. Primaries. Now that the primaries have come and gone, this is how each party
stands:
We expect the 2011 presidential polls to be keenly contested amongst the top
six candidates. However, we have narrowed our possible scenarios to two:
January 2011 12
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 13
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 14
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Currently only 5 states are implementing the programme and the World
Bank has further put in place an additional $50 million for states that
achieve a 30% implementation rate in 2011. We are optimistic that all these
factors will boost the productivity and performance of the agricultural sector
in Nigeria.
Crude Oil: Oil production which has been on an upward trajectory in recent
times becomes susceptible to increased volatility even as we approach the
2011 elections. Also, considering the gradual resurgence of attacks on oil
installations in the Niger Delta over the last few months, there are risks to a
stable level of production in the year. In our note, “Underlying Assumptions
– 2011 Outlook”, we provided our views on the outlook of crude oil prices
this year. Though its prognosis tilts favourably to the north, its sustenance in
that trajectory remains hinged on the performance of the global economy
especially the US, Asia and Europe.
The direction of crude oil exports are tilted towards the Americas, Asia and
Sustenance of oil prices Europe with the United States accounting for c.30% of imports. Despite a
remain hinged on the
positive 2011 outlook for the regions, growth remains very fragile and may
performance of the global
economy. be tipped over by the slightest negative developments such as a slowdown
in the Chinese economy and a deepening of the debt crisis in Europe. Crude
oil prices peaked at its 27-Month high on the 17th of January this year,
which feeds in favourably in terms of revenue for the Nigerian economy.
January 2011 15
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
The September MPR hike and the November SDF corridor adjustment have
significantly eased YOY inflation. The 12-month inflation rate fell from a peak
of 15.6% in February to 11.8% in December and is likely to continue to fall in
the early months of 2011 as the base effect kicks in. However, we believe
inflationary pressures are prevalent and are likely to increase as we approach
Election spending and
deregulation of the petroleum Q2 of 2011, with election spending spree set to kick in. months of 2011 as it
sector – forerunners of continues to ride on the effect of the CPI re-basing. More importantly, it has
inflationary pressure. become clearer that the causes of inflation are more structural than liquidity
driven. As such, we expect inflation to remain in double digits in 2011 in spite
of interest rate hikes by the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC).
Coupled with this is the recent depreciation of the Naira (declined by 1.1%
against the Dollar December to date) which we expect will push up the cost of
imported goods, thereby putting pressure on headline inflation through the
imported inflation index. As we switch from politics to policy in the second half
of the year, we expect the implementation of the deregulation of the
petroleum sector to take effect with short-term consequences which include
increase in consumer prices.
January 2011 16
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
We believe the government will depend a lot more on the private sector for
financing. For this purpose, the framework for a Viability Gap Fund (VGF) is
being designed in conjunction with the Infrastructure Concession and
Regulatory Commission (ICRC), and the World Bank to provide grants for
projects which have been identified as suitable for a PPP (Public Private
Partnership) arrangement. In our opinion, we are not likely to see much of
infrastructural activities until the successful conclusion of the April 2011
elections.
January 2011 17
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
CAPITAL MARKETS
High Expectations amid Uncertainty
Spirits Rekindled as Gains Return
The year 2010 opened with trades trending up, as investors adapted to the
initial shock of the Banking reforms of late 2009. As the fates of the Banks
took shape, cautious trading resumed in the Banking sector. Riding on this,
News on the operations of and backed by surges in the Building Materials and Food & Beverages sectors,
AMCON and the noteworthy
the All Share Index (ASI) rose through Q1’10 to peak at 28,029.78 (+34.51%)
listing of Dangote Cement Plc
revived interest the Market in April. Thereafter, the firm stance of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
through Q4’10 to keep the against the use of Bank stocks as collateral, administrative shake-ups in the
market vibrant, enabling it NSE (dismissal of the then DG, Dr. Okereke-Onyiuke and other executives) as
close the year 18.9% well as ripples of the Euro-zone sovereign debt crisis watered down trade
volumes, softening the momentum of the market over the tail-end of Q2’10
and early Q3’10. However, news on the operations of AMCON and the
noteworthy listing of Dangote Cement Plc revived interest the Market through
Q4’10 to keep the market vibrant, enabling it close the year 18.9% up at
24,770.52.
Beyond Satisfactory
Laudable for reversing the losses of the last two years to pitch the Index close
for the year in line with our forecast range of 24,603.33 (+18.06%) to
25,293.15 (+21.37%), 2010 was more remarkable for the positives it held.
Returning confidence in the bourse which saw foreign participation surge 88%
in 2010, and wider trading hours introduced in December led to a 16%
increase in traded volumes, meaning liquidity was improving from recent lows
of 2009. Fresh listings towards the end of the year brought more sectors
(most notably, the Building Materials sector) to the fore of the market,
evening out the spread of Index movement and softening the grip of the banks
on the market. This is expected to overshadow concerns raised by the
potential delisting of Nigerian Bottling Company and urge further foreign
investment in 2011. With the consummation of sizable M&A deals such as the
Dangcem-BCC combination, as well as the announcement of joint ventures like
the UAC-Tiger Brands deal and inklings of more to come, 2010 has set the
stage for further market growth in 2011 as investors anticipate performance-
based appreciation in the stocks of quoted companies.
January 2011 18
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Reforms Underway
Further on, refreshed talks about the Petroleum Industry Bill have placed its
passage behind the elections. On eventual execution, the bill would incite
shake-ups in the sector, with probable emergence of new companies built on
the local content clause even as existing ones flourish. Though the pay-offs
from the reforms fall in the long-term, increased interest in the sector is bound
to influence the stock market positively. In addition, on the slim chance that
the Power sector reforms take shape in 2011, other sectors that are heavy
The proposed upgrade of the energy spenders would enjoy the advantage of lower operating expenditure
trading platform through
via reduction in power costs.
partnership with the American
Express Company (AMEX) Within the stock market, the transformation that began last year is expected
would help the market
to start yielding dividends this year in the form of improved transparency
optimize the recent extension
of trading hours. more internal efficiency, and credible leadership. For one, the proposed
upgrade of the trading platform through partnership with the American
Express Company (AMEX) would help the market optimize the recent
extension of trading hours. This would draw the spotlight to the Nigerian
bourse as economic fog clouds Europe and foreign capital searches for
alternative investment destinations, especially Emerging and Frontier markets.
Driven by the incessant sovereign debt issuance in 2010 (an estimated N1.09
trillion), bond yields saw a sharp rise across all maturities. Despite the
We do not see a sharp decline protracted low interest rate environment, investors rode on the fiscal deficit
in yields, particularly as the and increasing debt profile of the government to demand higher returns.
monetary authority stands Though the matching upsurge of fixed income demand on the heels of
poised to tighten the system investors’ flight to safety relatively suppressed the short-end of the yield
curve, the impact was marginal as reflected in the 502bps and 135bps
increase on 3-year and 7-year tenor instruments (relative to the 704bps surge
on 20 year tenor). With due acknowledgment of the growing appetite of banks
to grow their loan books and the consequential impact of such asset allocation
on the yield curve; even as banks are prime players of the bonds market, we
do not see a sharp decline in yields, particularly as the monetary authority
stands poised to tighten the system. It is interesting to note that yields have
marginally retraced steps in the few trading days of the year as supply in the
secondary market eases on expectation of modest reduction in domestic
borrowing going forward, especially as the government tests the global market
with the launch of its debut US$500 million bond.
January 2011 19
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
SECTOR OUTLOOK
Banking: Risk gives way, eyes on fundamentals
We are overtly upbeat on 2011 earnings, as the key drags on growth fizzle
out. Aside our modest outlook on loan growth which is expected to enliven
interest income as well as fee and commission books, the steady uptick in
overall yield environment will provide support for appreciable growth in FY’11
earnings over 2010 levels.
Apt to say that the foregoing synchronized episodes in the Nigerian banking
system, are not just a fall-out of the H2’09 CBN/NDIC rounds of stress tests
but also of complimentary reforms and zero-tolerance for non-compliance
stance of the apex bank. The CBN’s streams of risk management reforms,
though with inevitable short term pains, have significantly changed the
business models of banks with consensus expectations of sustainable long-
term gains. While we are cautious to say that the apex bank is yet overdone
with strict reforms as it stands poised to consolidate on the modest stability
achieved in the last four quarters, we see the CBN putting up a relative
forbearance culture, especially as it persuades banks to buy-into its salient
objective of easing real sector financing.
January 2011 20
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Growth in private sector credit still down as banks take asylum in “risk-
free” assets (5.8% in 2010 Vs 5-year CAGR of 58.5%)
January 2011 21
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
The flight to safety over the last four quarters overshot banks’ exposure to
“risk-free” instruments as reflected in the currently high balance sheet liquidity
(c.42% Vs. regulatory requirement of 25%) with a preference for government
securities which was largely fuelled by incessant sovereign and sub-national
debt issuance.
In our opinion, this was a short term conservative strategy to preserve capital,
An attempt by the apex bank
given fears of further NPL formation, and we thus look forward to cautious
to narrow banks’ balance
sheet asylum is the regulation portfolio rebalancing. It was also a simultaneous necessity for a few banks
on maximum allowable with Capital Adequacy Ratios (CAR) in the threshold of management guidance
investment in sub-national (most Nigerian banks set 15% internal CAR guidance, 500bps above
debt issuance which is regulatory minimum). An attempt by the apex bank to narrow banks’ balance
expected to marginally incite sheet asylum is the regulation on maximum allowable investment in sub-
banks’ resumption to private
national debt issuance which is expected to marginally incite banks’
sector financing.
resumption to private sector financing.
Time series of banking sector balance sheet split; lenders take asylum in
“risk-free” investment securities
January 2011 22
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
More importantly, banks will, in the near term, distance their balance sheets
from volatile sectors, thus reducing the risk of near term NPL formation. With
the new stringent regulations on margin trading and repeal of universal
banking licence, banks’ probable irrational exuberance towards risk assets
creation is curbed. Though the CBN (as indicated in the new prudential
guidelines effective H2’10) plans to gather quarterly data over the next 5
years to guide its regulations on dynamic provisioning which is expected to
replace the general provisions on performing loans, we expect banks to initiate
this provisioning approach of their own volition. Nonetheless, it is noteworthy
that the current coverage ratio (percentage of NPLs that is provisioned for) of
our banking picks is adequate, especially the Tier-1 players with ≈100%
threshold coverage (ex-UBA and FBN).
January 2011 23
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 24
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Over 2010, the relatively high aversion of banks towards loan creation halted
the rally for deposits, as the lenders sit on huge liquid assets with little or no
need for fresh funds. At the other end of the spectrum, investors’ flight to
safety accelerated the flow of funds to banks in the form of time deposits, thus
suppressing rates to historic lows. Given that an average of 70% of banks’
balance sheets is funded with deposits, the crash in deposit rates thus offers
cheap funding for the lenders, albeit with less investible opportunities given
current market dynamics.
January 2011 25
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 26
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Figure 1: Growth stories from both top- and bottom- lines; a reflection of
low base and loan growth resumption.
January 2011 27
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Minimum
License Category Capital Scope of Operation Remarks
Operate within minimum of six (6) and Wema has filed application to
Regional N15 billion Maximum of twelve (12) contiguous states, operate in the South West
within two (2) geopolitical zones. Key lapse is region
the inability to carry out Settlement functions
National N25 billion Entitle to carry our business in all the states of We see Unity and Sterling Bank
the Federation treading this path
January 2011 28
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Beyond AMCON’s positive rub-offs on the operations of the banks and the
subsequent impact on their earnings, we believe that other sectors will take
The positive reaction of the
stock market to AMCON’s deal their share of the dividends of this intervention programme. Of particular
as reflected in the rally across significance is our outlook on the real estate market which has been bogged
all banking counters with down by the banking sector cyclone. The price erosion in real estate assets in
ripple effect on other sectors the last six quarters was majorly on the back of banks’ forced-sale of
on the bourse collaterals in respect of the real estate-backed NPLs; an attempt to recover
their capitals. Even though AMCON might continue on foreclosures, we expect
this to be at a gradual pace, thereby relieving pressure on real estate prices.
Equity
NPL (N'bn)* AMCON's Consideration (N'bn)
Bank (N'bn)*
Intercontinental Bank Plc (368.88) 526.21 146.00
Afribank Plc (249.89) 357.10 NA
Union Bank Plc (235.22) 113.56 239.00
Bank PHB Plc (189.45) 346.84 140.00
Finbank Plc (119.61) 157.42 44.00
Oceanic Bank Plc (108.31) 664.77 200.00
Spring Bank Plc (90.65) 130.52 23.00
Wema Bank Plc** (45.84) 70.61 15.20
* Based on Q3'10 positions
**WEMA has successfully recapitalized, meeting the N15bn requirement to operate as a regional bank
January 2011 29
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
The Face Value of the consideration bonds grossed N1.04 trillion; an implied
annualised yield of 10.125%.
What next?
Following the success of the first phase of the NPL purchase, the bad bank
indicated plans to reopen the deal for the purchase of other NPL of banks
which is expected to be around N500 billion. Nevertheless, recapitalising the
intervened banks to zero equity level is top priority. While an estimation of the
amount required to nil off the negative equity of the intervened banks is hazy
due to the dearth of information on a number of them, we believe the bad
bank still needs between N1.5 – N1.8 trillion to meet its objective of equating
the balance sheets of these banks.
Undervalued
Region
January 2011 31
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 32
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
B A S IC IN F O R M A T IO N
First Bank of Nigeria Plc (FBN)
A ddress Samual A sabia P lace Scale and Scope Economies are “Good Buys”
35 M arina, Lago s. Our fundamental valuation of Nigeria’s largest lender is compelling, trading at
Website www.firstbankplc.co m respective trailing book value multiple of 1.5x (vs. 2.1x African peers). Given
M anagement (Chairman) P rince A jibo la A fo nja the bank’s strong fundamentals and our upbeat outlook on its near term
earnings and asset quality, we are comfortable with our 12-months base case
M D/CEO B isi Onasanya
fair valuation of its equity which stands at N18.11. This estimate of the
Financial Year End December
bank’s share; an equally-weighted blend of Free Cash Flow to Equity and
Exchange Listing Nigerian Sto ck Exchange Excess Returns Models, implies 14.8% upside relative to the current market
Symbo l B lo o mberg: FIRSTB A :NL price. FBN’s equity deserves our “ACCUMULATE” rating.
January 2011 33
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets (2,021) (6,423) (40,625) (4,160) (6,636) (5,014)
Profit Before Tax 25,854 47,511 11,560 57,553 65,813 81,865
January 2011 34
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 35
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 36
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets (1,832) (6,327) (39,865) (3,321) (3,297) (4,855)
Profit Before Tax 25,676 56,119 35,085 54,945 71,853 82,167
January 2011 37
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets (53) (76) (329) (114) (51) (23)
January 2011 38
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 39
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets + EI (7,863) (11,402) (49,032) (16,950) (7,671) (3,467)
Profit Before Tax 25,419 48,029 6,637 15,986 37,727 52,875
January 2011 40
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 41
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 42
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets and EI (253) (4,042) (37,527) (6,993) (6,939) (6,796)
Profit Before Tax 15,716 35,177 27,963 46,385 51,268 59,332
January 2011 43
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets (2) (27) (252) (47) (47) (46)
Profit Before Tax 105 236 187 311 344 398
Taxation (17) (46) (29) (62) (69) (80)
Profit After Tax 88 190 159 249 275 318
January 2011 44
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
B A SIC IN F OR M A T ION
Stanbic-IBTC Bank Plc (IBTC)
Address I.B.T.C. Place, Walter Carringto n Investment Banking is the Cash Cow
Victoria Island, lago s IBTC which is largely an investment bank, with 76% of gross earnings traceable
Website www.stanbicibtc.com to Wealth Management and Investment banking operations, needs to further
M anagement (Chairman) Atedo N. A. Peterside diversify its business to avert probable regulatory constraint in the near term.
M D/CEO Chris Newso n
Though yet to announce, we think a HoldCo licence is sine non qua non for IBTC.
In line with its conventional ride on positive investors’ sentiments, the equity of
Financial Year End December
the bank is currently priced at a 137% premium to its book value (an expensive
Exchange Listing Nigerian Stock Exchange
valuation relative to the average P/BV of 1.1x of Nigerian Tier-II lenders). Just
Symbol Bloo mberg: IBTCCB:NL as a review of technical metrics on IBTC suggests that the current price is full,
our DCF valuation is rich, as we arrive at a base case target price of
OWN ER SH IP ST R UC T UR E (%)
N10.02/share for IBTC. This valuation presents a 4.6% downside risk; albeit we
Retail Shareholders 12.00%
are “NEUTRAL” on IBTC given market sentiments.
Institutio nal Shareholders 88.00%
Investment thesis
SH A R E ST A T IST IC S
Penetrating the market faster than we anticipated: With IBTC’s recent
Shares in issue (M ) 18,750
aggressive organic growth, we suspect the bank has rescinded its earlier
Share Price (N) 10.50 interest in acquiring a CBN-intervened bank. In spite of the lull in the industry,
M arket Cap. (N'm) 193,688 over 2010 IBTC added >50 branches to gross up its footprint to 128. In our
M arket Cap. (USD'm) 1,298 opinion, this aggressive move of IBTC to deepen its personal and business
Free Flo at (%) 12.00%
banking segment may not be unconnected with the implied stance of CBN to
direct banks’ focus to core financial intermediation and its strategy of
Daily Average Value Traded (N'000) 27,643
harvesting the attractive spread in the retail market.
Daily Average Value Traded (USD'000) 185.3 Spearheading the loan growth story: While not immune to the heightened
risk in the credit market, as at Q3’10, IBTC has grown its loan book by 33%
Year high (N) 11.38
(relative to FY’09 level), a reflection of its proactive steps to take full
Year low (N) 9.20 advantage of the waiver on the erstwhile regulatory cap on Loan-to-Deposit
(LTD) ratio of 80%. IBTC’s LTD currently stands at 105%. While this
VA LUA T ION M ET R IC S
aggressive appetite for risk is fuelled by the depressed yield on money market
Boo k Value (N'm) 82,984
instruments, and also supported by its high CAR (still 27.8% from 35.0% in
Trailing P/E (x) 21.88 FY’09), the bank takes on the risk of asset quality deterioration.
P/B (x) 2.37 We look forward to FY’11 PAT flight of 55%: In addition to our
Div. Yield (%) 2.9% expectation of earnings rub-off from loan book expansion, we believe the
ROE (%) 10.8% bank will further leverage on its rich investment banking income profile to
post a startling 55% bottom line growth in FY’11, as we look forward to a
Leverage Ratio (x) 4.70 post-tax earnings of N16.9 billion. Our confidence in IBTC earnings outlook
becomes stronger when we consider the recovery in the capital market; a
STANBIC IBTC VS BANKING VS NSE ASI PERFORMANCE
Rebased 04/01/2010
core niche of the bank. Our earnings forecast which translates to a RoAE of
18.3% is premised on the bank’s ability to achieve our target CIR of 62%.
January 2011 45
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets and EI (2,044) (5,020) (4,858) (1,336) (1,728) (2,434)
Profit Before Tax 10,992 14,627 10,342 14,066 22,589 26,613
January 2011 46
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 47
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
A ddress P lo t 1665, Oyin Jolayemi Str., A Tenacious Brand Posing Challenge to Market Leaders
Victo ria Island, Lagos. We bring back to mind investors’ acknowledgement of the attractive near term
Website www.accessbankplc.co m
earnings potentials of ACCESS as reinforced by the positive returns of its shares
amid 2009 investors’ aversion to banking counters. Notwithstanding the
M anagement (Chairman) G. Oyebo de
appreciable gains recorded in the last two years, our base case valuation which
M D/CEO A. I. Aig-Imo ukhuede
stands at N12.80/share justifies the gains with an attractive potential return
Financial Year End December outlook of 25.4%, thus informing our “BUY” rating on ACCESS.
Exchange Listing Nigerian Sto ck Exchange
Investment thesis
Symbo l Blo o mberg: ACCESS:NL Bridging the gap; ACCESS may join the big-4 Nigerian lenders soon:
OWN E R SH IP ST R UC T UR E ( %) To our mind, ACCESS tenacity to join the Tier-1 players may come to fruition
Retail Shareho lders 35.26%
earlier than anticipated as the bank steadily bridges the gap from loan market
share perspective. Amid fears of heightened credit risk, the bank grew its
Institutio nal (Do mestic) 37.68%
balance sheet and loan book by 18% and 10% correspondingly. We believe
Fo reign 27.06%
ACCESS’ capital buffer as reflected in its CAR of 28% offers adequate leeway
S H A R E ST A T IS T IC S for its convergence with Nigeria’s big-4 lenders. While we are buyers of
Shares in issue (M ) 17,888 efficiency as against bungling rivalry for size, we are confident that ACCESS’
Share Price (N) 10.19
relative hold on costs will buoy well for its organic expansion, especially as we
look forward to cost savings on the heels of a maturing low cost retail arm
M arket Cap. (N'm) 184,070
and imminent scale economies. With its steady organic growth and
M arket Cap. (USD'm) 1,234
penetration of the retail market which we believe will complement a modest
Free Flo at (%) 35.26% brand in the corporate space, ACCESS may post earnings surprise beyond our
Daily A verage Value Traded (N'000)
FY’11 outlook of N22.8 billion.
114,701
Improving asset quality and reporting are laudable: ACCESS’ fruitful
Dailly Average Value Traded (USD'000) 768.9
balance sheet repair is laudable, from a NPL of 19% in FY’09 to 11% as at
Year high (N) 11.10 Q3’10 with expectation that the sale of its margin-related NPLs to AMCON will
further scale down the bank’s toxic assets. More importantly, we have
Year lo w (N) 9.50
relative comfort in the quality of ACCESS’ earnings, given its modest
V A LUA T ION M ET R IC S coverage of +80% over NPLs and improved disclosure. Though the bank will
B oo k Value (N'm) 170,633 maintain a dual reporting till regulatory cut-off date set at January 2012,
Trailing P/E (x) 14.35
ACCESS has implemented full conversion of its system to IFRS.
January 2011 48
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets (1,775) (3,897) (21,530) (8,226) (4,836) (3,863)
Profit Before Tax 8,043 18,846 (2,705) 19,685 30,385 38,635
January 2011 49
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 50
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 51
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets and EI (2,595) (4,113) (34,847) (5,617) (4,505) (4,474)
Profit Before Tax 7,970 21,474 844 13,110 16,628 20,438
January 2011 52
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets (17) (28) (234) (38) (30) (30)
Profit Before Tax 53 144 6 88 111 137
January 2011 53
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
O WN ER SH IP ST R UC T UR E ( %) Investment thesis
Retail Shareho lders 20.00% Cheap funding and sustained high retail lending rates; drivers of
Institutional Shareho lders 80.00% margins: As a complement to its conviction of bankable opportunities in the
retail-end of the loan market, the bank achieved an impressive rebalancing of
S H A R E ST A T IST IC S
its deposit mix, with cheaper funding sources (savings and demand)
Shares in issue (M ) 14,475
constituting 74% of deposit base. Given our expectation of a sustained high
Share Price (N) 8.71 rates on retail loan and DIAMOND’s improving access to cheap funds, we are
M arket Cap. (N'm) 130,277 upbeat on its net interest margin which peaked at 10.3% in Q3’10 and expect
M arket Cap. (USD'm) 873 it to be a core driver for near term profitability.
High NPL mirrors retail lending risk: Despite modest coverage of +80%,
Free Float (%) 20.00%
all eyes are on DIAMOND’s worrying NPL which stood at 16.8% in Q3’10 (vs.
Daily Average Value Traded (N'000) 85,058 mid-tier peer average of 12%). It is imperative to note that the obstinate NPL
Daily Average Value Traded (USD'000)
ratio is also reflective of the 7.9% YoY decline in loans, as this obscures the N9
570.2
billion recovery in toxic assets in the last three quarters. Apt to say that this
Year high (N) 9.27 high percentage of NPL is a mirror of the bank’s sizable exposure to the retail
Year lo w (N) 7.50 end of the credit market which commands >50% of the bank’s loan book.
V A LUA T IO N M E T R IC S FY’11 RoAE still suppressed; albeit, we see swift near term recovery:
B ook Value (N'm) 105,647 Though the bank’s lending appetite may be constrained in the near term as it
rebalances portfolios to shore-up its declining CAR (15.4%, 680bps YoY
Trailing P/E (x) 19.36
decline), we are convinced that the bank’s top and bottom- lines will ride on
P /B (x) 1.19
resilient yield on assets and improving cost structures (declining funding and
Div. Yield (%) 0.0% operating costs) to deliver our FY’11 outlook of N113.8 billion and N12.0 billion
respectively. While this earnings projection translates to a RoAE of 10.6%; a
ROE (%) 6.1%
huge discount to its estimated cost of equity of 17.5%, we believe the market
Leverage Ratio (x) 5.84
s hould price-in the expected RoAE recovery post 2011 hurdle (an average of
17.1% over the near term).
January 2011 54
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets (2,240) (4,879) (24,745) (10,694) (4,165) (4,889)
Profit Before Tax 9,008 16,214 -12,374 11,090 20,587 22,646
January 2011 55
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 56
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 57
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Provision for risk assets + EI (3,159) (21,846) (5,733) 2,982 (1,323) (953)
January 2011 58
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 59
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Floods in Australia, excessively Floods in Australia, excessively hot weather in Latin America and climate
hot weather in Latin America, change-induced bad weather in the Black Region have also contributed to the
climate change-induced bad upward pressure on prices, as outlook for output continues to be reviewed
weather in the Black Region as downwards. The United States Department for Agriculture (USDA) revised
well as political unrest in Cote global outlook for crop harvests after the warning, as supply shocks continue
d’Ivoire have contributed to
to pressure already high prices. For example, wheat prices are expected to
price pressures, as outlook for
output continues to be remain volatile especially in H1’11, while wheat futures have risen 80% since
reviewed downwards. June 2010.
Weather conditions are not expected to abate in the nearest future; as such
there might be periods of sustained increases in food commodity prices. This
anxiety has impacted other food commodity prices such as rice, which should
ordinarily be on the decline due to improving supply and stock conditions.
However there seems to be a bandwagon effect, as all food commodities are
headed north. We review major commodities that are key input for Nigerian
manufacturers.
January 2011 60
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Wheat Prices
The outlook for wheat prices is quite dampened as demand outstrips supply;
although we had earlier stated in our report in the month of August - ‘Wheat
Prices - No Cause for Alarm’ - that the global output far outstrips global
The outlook for wheat prices is
dampened as demand demand/consumption, and this situation held up until September. We also
outstrips supply, exacerbated highlighted a major risk to our analysis being an extension of the ban on
by expectations of tighter wheat exports by Russia.
supplies of high-quality wheat
with a sharp reduction in grain The above stated risks did play out unfortunately and as a result the present
quality in 2011 for Germany,
situation and outlook for wheat prices seems gloomy for the rest of the year as
Canada and Australia.
it appears that there is a shortfall in global supply. This is further exacerbated
by expectations of tighter supplies of high-quality wheat with a sharp
reduction in grain quality in 2011 for Germany, Canada and Australia. For the
two major flourmillers, Flour Mills and Dangote Flour, we expect the above to
impact on margins but the effect will vary for both companies.
680 Deficit 9
of
670 22MT
8
660 7
650 6
640 5
630 4
620 3
610 2
We expect soaring wheat We are of the opinion that Flour Mills also has a wealth of experience in this
prices to impact margins for sector given its 50 years existence and would have long ago devised means of
the two major flour millers but dealing with this issue. On the other hand, Dangote Flour maybe relatively
the effect will vary for both more exposed in terms of shocks to its bottom-line. Overall, expectation is
companies. Should the burden that flour millers should have been proactive and hedged prices as far out as
become too heavy, the flour
possible. In any case, we expect flour millers to pass on costs if the burden
millers may pass on costs to
consumers. becomes too heavy.
Sugar Prices
January 2011 61
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
165
2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 45
160
40
155
35
150
30
145
25
140
20
135
15
Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10
130
Production Consum ption
In 2010, sugar began on a low key, as we saw prices taking a breather from
Even though production levels its northwards run in the previous year. Even though there were periods of
are still in line with spikes earlier in the year, this was not sustained given high supply and
consumption, global
production levels. Consequently, sugar prices continued to plummet from
consumption is rising pushing
up price, further exacerbated record highs. There was a reversal of fortunes in the later part of the year as
by the increasing use of sugar the trend of low sugar prices upturned and prices began a gradual ascent in
cane for alternative source of August, and by November were trading at 30-year highs driven by bad harvest
power/fuel. in major producing areas such as Brazil, India and China.
Even though, sugar production levels are still in line with consumption,
speculations are that the global recovery may spark a rise in consumption
hence creating a deficit in global supply and production of sugar. Global
consumption is rising and prices are moving upwards further exacerbated by
the increasing use of sugar cane for alternative source of power/fuel, e.g.
Ethanol.
Cocoa Prices
The perceived lack of In the cocoa market, the major driving force of the upsurge in prices is the
investment in the sector by perceived lack of investment in the sector by the producers, most of which are
the producers, most of which poor farmers in West Africa. The bulk of cocoa (c.75%) traded in the
are poor farmers in West international market is sourced from West Africa, in which most of the farmers
Africa who account for c.75% are poor and receive little or no assistance from their Governments towards
of world cocoa supply, is a
financing large/industrial scale production of cocoa, hence most remain on a
major driver of prices.
small-medium scale. Nigeria is the 4th largest producer of cocoa in the world
after Ivory Coast, Indonesia and Ghana.
January 2011 62
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
We note that the increase in global cocoa prices in 2010 was quite moderate
Our expectations are for cocoa compared to 2009 prices which were at record highs. Our expectations are for
prices to gradually firm up, cocoa prices to gradually firm up, owing to political uncertainty surrounding
owing to political uncertainty
top producer Ivory Coast, amid dwindling production. Production of Cocoa
surrounding top producer
Ivory Coast, amid dwindling from the Ivory Coast has been consistently decreasing and was down by
production. 175,000 tons in 2008/09 crop year. The cocoa harvest in Ivory Coast has
fallen by more than 15% in last five years, a base effect that pushed the
prices to peak levels in 30 years; this mainly due to diseases such as swollen
shoot and black pod.
COCOA PRICES
(December 2008 – December 2010) Dollar per metric ton
3,800.00
3,600.00
3,400.00
3,200.00
3,000.00
2,800.00
2,600.00
2,400.00
2,200.00
Dec-08 Jun-09 Dec-09 Jun-10 Dec-10
The confectionery companies The confectionery companies such as Nestle and Cadbury are usually not as
such as Nestle and Cadbury sensitive to the volatility in their input prices as the flour millers, so we expect
are usually not as sensitive to the impact on the these companies to be relatively mild. Also, we note that
the volatility in their input
both Cadbury and Nestle have invested in backward integration given Nigeria’s
prices as the flour millers, so
we expect the impact on the position as one of the top producers of cocoa in the world, most of these
these companies to be companies have to the best of their abilities hedged against upsurge in input
relatively mild. prices.
It is unlikely brewers will pass For sorghum, another mainstay ingredient for the brewers, expectations are
the pressures on to that production would match or slightly outstrip world consumption (according
consumers, in terms of price to the United States Department of Agriculture) so price should remain stable.
hikes in the near term, as they Nigeria is the second largest producer of sorghum in the world and consumes
would seek to consolidate almost all its produce, with Nigerian Breweries’ sorghum plantation initiative
brand loyalty and volumes providing significant headroom for it to manage costs on this front. However,
sales, given persistent
exchange rate shocks are a possible downside risk to this stability, especially
competition from new entrants
in the market. for Guinness which still imports the crop, although our expectations for a
stable exchange rate diminish this threat significantly. At any rate, the
brewers currently import about 25%-35% of their input needs through joint
purchase agreements with their parent companies, so we expect that they
have hedged against these risks.
January 2011 63
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
155
2.5
150
200 2
145
140 1.5
150
135
1
130
0.5
100 125
Mar-08
Jun-08
Mar-09
Jun-09
Mar-10
Jun-10
Dec-07
Sep-08
Dec-08
Sep-09
Dec-09
Sep-10
Dec-10
120 0
2000/01
2001/02
2002/03
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
Source: Index Mundi, Vetiva Research
Source: USDA, Vetiva Research
Overall, it is unlikely that if these pressures continue, the brewers will pass
them on to consumers, in terms of price hikes in the near term, as they would
seek to consolidate brand loyalty and volumes sales, given persistent
competition from new entrants in the market. Also, returns from growth in
volume sales on the back of increased marketing spend should provide a
buffer to significant erosion of earnings.
Like many manufacturers, Consumer companies have felt the pinch of slower
demand and tighter credit as consumers have reduced discretionary spending.
Also, wholesalers and distributors have faced challenges to funding working
capital positions for pushing products into the market. With growth in credit to
the private sector forecast at c.15% (Vetiva Research estimates) for 2011, an
improvement from 2010 levels (5%), but skewed toward low-risk blue chips,
access to credit would still remain tight for middlemen, thus impacting on their
ability to reach markets.
12.00 80.0%
Credit Annualized Growth
70.0%
11.00
60.0%
10.00
50.0%
9.00 40.0%
8.00 30.0%
20.0%
7.00
10.0%
6.00
0.0%
5.00 -10.0%
Q1'08
Q2'08
Q3'08
Q4'08
Q1'09
Q2'09
Q3'09
Q4'09
Q1'10
Q2'10
Q3'10
Q4'10
January 2011 64
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
While external shocks from commodity prices are expected to put pressure on
consumer companies, the winners the sector will be companies with relatively
easy access to funding and efficient distribution network. Diversification across
various product ranges can also be a critical success factor. Our preference will
be for products that are able to withstand economic cycles.
January 2011 65
[Type text]
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
1.2
YoY Change (%) 17.43% 28.13% 45.29% 41.05% 24.74%
Price to Earnings (x) 24.88 19.42 13.37 9.48 7.60
1
Dividend Per Share (N) 12.55 16.13 19.30 27.23 33.96
0.8
YoY Change (%) 0.00% 28.54% 19.65% 41.05% 24.74%
0.6
Dividend Yield (%) 3.41% 4.38% 5.24% 7.39% 9.22%
Net Assets Per Share (N) 15.96 18.82 20.98 23.38 26.10
Source: Company; Vetiva Research YoY Change (%) 16.76% 17.91% 11.46% 11.43% 11.65%
Price to Book (x) 23.09 19.58 17.57 15.76 14.12
Source: Company Financials; Vetiva Research
January 2011 66
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Other Receivables and Current Assets 956 979 854 1,158 1,107 4,583
January 2011 67
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
2012
INCOME STATEMENT (USD’Mill) 2007 2008 2009 2010 F 2011 F F
Turnover 295 347 458 561 853 1109
Cost of Sales -186 -210 -268 -308 -370 -436
Gross Profit 109 137 190 253 483 672
Other Creditors 16 20 21 25 33 39
Creditors & Accruals 7 12 8 10 12 21
Short Term Loan - - 20 24 30 51
Taxation 16 13 31 38 48 70
Long-Term Loans - 40 80 80 80 80
Provision for Gratuity 38 3 4 4 7 10
Prior Year Dividend 4 4 8 10 14 25
Deferred Taxation 8 17 14 15 17 18
Share Capital 2 2 2 2 2 2
Share Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0
Revenue and Capital reserve 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total Equity 38 38 38 38 38 38
January 2011 68
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Margins (%)
EBITDA/Sales 25.4% 25.3% 27.3% 25.5% 26.9%
EBIT/Sales 23.0% 23.0% 25.1% 24.0% 25.7%
Gross Profit Margin 39.5% 41.5% 45.1% 56.7% 60.7%
Pretax Income/Sales 22.9% 20.2% 22.0% 21.4% 23.2%
Net Profit Margin 16.1% 14.3% 15.0% 14.3% 15.5%
Liquidity Ratios (x)
Quick ratio 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2
Cash ratio 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Current ratio 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6
Net interest coverage (x) 176.5 7.7 8.1 9.1 10.4
Days in inventory 45.3 57.2 52.3 41.3 35.5
Days in accounts payable 12.9 6.3 6.2 5.1 7.1
Days in cash 25.7 9.4 17.0 14.0 13.4
Days in receivables 30.4 18.2 18.1 14.5 13.6
Capital Structure
Financial leverage (debt to equity) 66.2% 113.1% 436.1% 460.0% 509.0%
Payout ratio 99.5% 84.7% 85.0% 70.0% 70.0%
Total equity/Total assets 31.0% 23.8% 22.9% 20.8% 18.7%
Retention ratio 0.5% 15.3% 15.0% 30.0% 30.0%
Per Share Data
EPS 12.61 14.81 18.98 27.58 38.90
DPS 12.55 12.55 16.13 19.30 27.23
NAPS 13.67 15.96 18.82 20.98 23.38
Sales/Share 78.34 103.43 126.70 192.59 250.18
January 2011 69
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
1.6
Earnings Per Share (N) 14.81 18.98 27.58 38.90 48.52
January 2011 70
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Interest received and similar income 2,939 4,108 22,648 43,276 63,600
Bank and cash balances 19,361 19,835 6,389 3,898 4,873 6,091
Other Receivables and Current Assets 13,229 11,493 9,040 1,158 1,107 4,583
January 2011 71
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Debtors 36 36 43 28 34 41
Share capital 5 6 6 6 6 6
Share premium 39 39 39 39 39 39
Capital Reserve 28 28 28 28 28 28
Revaluation Reserves 6 6 6 6 6 6
Revenue/General Reserve 38 38 38 38 38 38
Shareholders' Equity 38 38 38 38 38 38
January 2011 72
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Growth (%)
Turnover growth 41% 15% 6% 8% 3%
Growth in EBITDA 40% 62% 15% -27% 59%
Growth in PBT -44% 347% 3% 9% 9%
Growth in PAT -39% 335% 4% 9% 9%
Profitability (%)
Margins (%)
Capital Structure
Financial leverage (debt to equity) 94% 70% 65% 47% 35%
Interest bearing debt/Total assets 26% 26% 26% 21% 16%
Payout ratio 22% 20% 20% 21% 24%
Total equity/Total assets 27% 37% 40% 44% 46%
Retention ratio 78% 80% 80% 79% 76%
January 2011 73
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
1
Dividend Per Share (N) 0.80 1.02 1.09 1.01 0.75
Net Assets Per Share (N) 5.69 5.68 6.72 8.06 9.67
Source: Company; Vetiva Research
YoY Change (%) 15.59% -0.25% 18.36% 19.83% 20.04%
January 2011 74
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Bank and cash balances 1,680 1,648 512 1,070 1,966 1,966
Other Receivables and Current Assets 9,546 8,264 5,045 5,267 2,547 0
Revaluation Reserves 0 0 0 0
January 2011 75
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Operating Expenses 8 30 64 90 67 79
Other Income 1 7 2 2 8 9
EBITDA 9 37 66 92 75 88
Depreciation
EBIT/Operating Profit 9 25 48 92 75 88
Inventories 77 66 55 67 81 101
Share capital 17 17 17 17 17 17
Share premium 79 79 79 79 79 79
Capital Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shareholders' Equity 38 38 38 38 38 39
January 2011 76
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Growth (%)
Turnover growth 14% 28% 15% 20% 38%
Growth in EBITDA 311% -96% 5454% -18% -4%
Growth in PBT 369% 70% 88% -25% -8%
Growth in PAT 432% 86% 27% 2% -5%
Profitability (%)
Margins (%)
Capital Structure
January 2011 77
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
3
Earnings Per Share (N) -0.39 0.48 0.81 1.28 1.44
2.5
YoY Change (%) n/a 21.10% 68.63% 59.12% 12.22%
2
Price to Earnings (x) 15.11 59.16 35.08 22.05 19.65
1.5
Dividend Per Share (N) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.48
1
YoY Change (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 23.44%
0.5
Dividend Yield (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.36% 1.68%
0
Net Assets Per Share (N) 0.00 4.55 5.36 6.26 7.23
YoY Change (%) 0.00% 0.00% 17.82% 16.76% 15.42%
Source: Company; Vetiva Research
Price to Book (x) 0.00 6.22 5.28 4.52 3.92
Source: Company Financials; Vetiva Research
January 2011 78
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 79
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
2012
INCOMESTATEMENT (USD’Mill) 2007 2008 2009 2010 F 2011 F F
Turnover 134 163 172 194 225 265
Cost of Sales -101 -115 -113 -114 -130 -146
Gross Profit 32 48 58 80 95 120
2012
BALANCE SHEET 2007 2008 2009 2010 F 2011 F F
Fixed Assets 107 98 96 102 106 109
Inventories 21 24 20 21 22 23
Debtors 17 26 19 19 19 19
Bank and cash balances 16 11 34 35 36 38
Other Receivables and Current
Assets 2 1 0 0 0 1
Shareholders' Equity 38 38 38 38 38 39
January 2011 80
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Growth (%)
Turnover growth 22% 5% 13% 16% 18%
Growth in EBIT -70% -284% 17% 12% 56%
Growth in PBT -41% -16% 190% 74% 59%
Growth in PAT 279% -55% 221% 69% 59%
Profitability (%)
Margins (%)
Capital Structure
January 2011 81
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Symbol
Investment thesis
Bloomberg: GLAXOSMITH:NL
Sector Healthcare
Regulatory Cleansing Brighten Prospects: The company has
consistently delivered on value, even though our outlook on its service
C ountry Nigeria
healthcare sector is Neutral, premised on the under developed state of the
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (%)
industry. . We acknowledge the National Agency for Food and Drug
Setfirst Limited 27.3
Administration and Control (NAFDAC)’s efforts at ridding the
SmithKline Beecham Plc 19.1
pharmaceutical industry of fake and substandard products, but we also note
Others 53.6
that a lot still needs to be done to establish a well-structured healthcare
SHARE STATISTICS
delivery system. GSK has over the years benefitted from the Over-The-
Shares in issue (M) 957.0
Counter (OTC) market, having carved a niche for itself especially with its
Share Price (N) 26.50
Panadol brand (the leader in the analgesic market). The OTC market is a
Market Cap. (N'm) 27,744.0
very important and large segment given the poor state of healthcare
Market Cap. (USD'm) 186.0
delivery in Nigeria.
Free Float (%) 53.58
On-going Plant Upgrade and Product Expansion - GSK has embarked
Year high (N) 31.50
on the modernization of its manufacturing process, and expansion of its
Year low (N) 20.85
product portfolio. We are beginning to see the results of product expansion
VALUATION METRICS
with the introduction of Horlicks and Panadol with Optizorb in Q3’10. The
Book Value (N'm) 7,259.0
Company has also strengthened the marketing and distribution of its
Trailing P/E (x) 14.7
products to improve consumer awareness and acceptance. GSK’s upgrade
P/B (x) 3.9
of plants is expected to increase efficiency and speed up production
Div. Yield (%) 2.1
process. We expect these initiatives to continually impact favourably on the
ROAE (%) 13.5
company’s sales and profitability profile going forward.
Debt/Equity (%) 0.0
Earnings Outlook: Our FY’11 projection for Sales and Earnings stands at
GSK VS HEALTHCARE VS NSE ASI PERFORMANCE N19.1 billion (18.0% YoY) and N2.2 billion (13.7% YoY), hence we expect a
Rebased 04/01/2010
Forward EPS of N2.26, Forward PE of 11.5x and Dividend of and N1.04. Our
expectation is that GSK will continue to maintain its leadership position in
the consumer healthcare sector and leverage on competitive advantage of
parent R&D support and product innovation.
Forecast Summary FY'09A FY'10F FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F
Earnings Per Share (N) 1.78 1.99 2.26 2.42 2.79
YoY Change (%) 33.26% 11.74% 13.74% 6.94% 15.20%
Price to Earnings (x) 14.90 13.33 11.72 10.96 9.51
Dividend Per Share (N) 0.75 0.85 1.04 1.14 1.31
YoY Change (%) 25.00% 13.96% 21.67% 9.27% 15.20%
Dividend Yield (%) 2.83% 3.23% 3.92% 4.29% 4.94%
Source: Company; Vetiva Research
Net Assets Per Share (N) 6.88 8.24 9.46 12.49 13.59
YoY Change (%) 20.76% 19.72% 14.82% 32.00% 8.83%
Price to Book (x) 3.85 3.22 2.80 2.12 1.95
Source: Company Financials; Vetiva Research
January 2011 82
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Bank and cash balances 512 1,192 2,149 2,321 3,482 3,830
Share premium 51 51 51 51 51 51
Revaluation Reserves 25 25 25 25 25 25
January 2011 83
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Gross Profit 26 36 44 51 62 75
EBIT 8 18 27 22 26 30
Taxation -2 -4 -5 -6 -6 -7
2012
BALANCE SHEET 2007 2008 2009 2010 F 2011 F F
Fixed Assets 24 27 32 38 45 53
Inventories 17 17 23 17 27 39
Debtors 14 13 11 23 20 30
Other Creditors 22 22 31 33 34 36
Total liabilities 22 22 31 33 34 36
Share capital 3 3 3 3 3 3
Share premium 0 0 0 0 0 0
Revaluation Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0
Revenue/General Reserve 27 33 40 49 57 80
Shareholders' Equity 31 37 44 53 61 91
January 2011 84
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 85
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Address 24, Oba Akran Avenue Further growth expected on capacity expansion
Ikeja, Lagos
Given its niche in the stout segment, rapid growth in Harp volumes, and
Website www.guinness-nigeria.com
growing beer consumption in Nigeria, our outlook on Guinness is positive. We
Management (Chairman) Babatunde Savage
expect ongoing capacity expansion to position Guinness to tap into this growth
MD/C EO D.M Hainsworth
story. Following adjustments in our DDM valuation model, our 12 month target
Financial Year End June price now stands at N195.01. However, at its current price of N220.00, the
Exchange Listing Nigerian Stock Exchange stock is trading at a downside of 23.8% to our target value, hence our
Symbol
“REDUCE” rating.
Bloomberg: GUINNESS:NL
January 2011 86
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 87
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 88
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Market Position
Nigerian Beer market size (mhl) 14.5 15.0 16.6 18.2 19.8
Beer market volume growth 16.0% 3.4% 10.6% 9.5% 8.7%
Population (mn) 147.81 151.87 156.05 160.34 164.75
Beer PCC (litres) 9.8 9.9 10.6 11.3 12.0
Guinness market share 25.0% 26.0% 28.0% 28.2% 28.5%
Guinness volume 3.6 3.9 4.6 5.1 5.6
Price/mhl 19,082.17 22,858.51 23,544.27 24,721.48 25,932.84
Growth (%)
Volume 20.8% 7.6% 19.1% 10.3% 9.9%
Price/mhl -8.1% 19.8% 3.0% 5.0% 4.9%
Turnover growth 11.1% 28.9% 22.7% 15.8% 15.3%
Core Operating profit 18.7% 23.5% -2.5% 25.8% 21.0%
Growth in EBITDA 17.7% 22.1% -0.1% 22.7% 20.9%
Growth in PBT 23.9% 10.5% 0.3% 29.3% 20.7%
Growth in PAT 11.8% 14.2% 1.4% 30.0% 20.7%
Profitability (%)
Return on Average Equity 34.6% 39.6% 41.8% 50.3% 56.0%
Return on Average Assets 16.4% 18.4% 18.0% 20.3% 20.6%
Gross Margin 48.5% 47.8% 43.6% 45.7% 46.0%
EBITDA Margin 28.9% 27.4% 22.3% 23.6% 24.8%
EBIT Margin 24.6% 23.6% 19.3% 20.2% 21.2%
Pretax Profit Margin 26.5% 22.7% 18.6% 20.7% 21.7%
Net Profit Margin 17.1% 15.2% 12.6% 14.1% 14.8%
Valuation Multiples
P/E (x) 10.9 18.0 20.5 18.2 15.1
P/B (x) 3.5 7.7 8.2 8.8 8.1
Dividend Yield (%) 6.8% 4.5% 4.3% 4.7% 5.6%
EV/EBITDA (x) 5.9 10.0 11.0 10.5 8.6
January 2011 89
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Financial Year End December revise our rating on the stock to “REDUCE”. In our opinion, the vast rally in
Exchange Listing Nigerian Stock Exchange price on the back of news of Heineken’s acquisitions, which pushed the price to
Symbol Bloomberg: NB:NL
N91.83, further stretched valuation for NB. However, should we see some
Sector Breweries more pull back in price; we would still play the beer market at these attractive
C ountry Nigeria valuations in order to buy into the underlying growth story.
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (%)
Heineken N.V. 54.1 Investment thesis
Others 45.9
SHARE STATISTICS
Pressure from input costs, but enhanced local content strategy to
Shares in issue (M) 7,563.0
provide buffer: Following the challenging outing brewers had in 2009,
Share Price (N) 89.85 recovery in volume growth and profitability improved in 2010. However, given
Market C ap. (N'm) 679,535.6 the sensitivity of margins to our valuation, the continued rise in the prices of
Market C ap. (USD'm) 4,555.4 key inputs (barley, aluminum) could weaken our outlook. However, the
Free Float (%) 45.90 continuous drive of the local content (production inputs) initiative is our basis
Daily Average Value Traded for positive margin outlook for NB. We note that any slack in this regard could
(N'000) 159,819.9
Daily Average Value Traded
further enlarge NB’s susceptibility to commodity price volatility, FX risk and
(USD'000) 1,071.4 margin depression.
Year high (N) 82.21
Strong Parent Support to Possibly Fend-off Competition: In our
Year low (N) 53.00
VALUATION METRICS
Breweries Sector Update (Brewing Growth, Malting Value published in October
Book Value (N'm) 40,892.0 2010) we had highlighted the potential source of alpha that exists through the
Trailing P/E (x) 24.5 direct acquisition and repositioning of fringe players. The recent acquisition of
P/B (x) 18.5
five breweries by the Heineken N.V. group weakens the competitive threat
Div. Yield (%) 3.8
from new entrants like SAB Miller because it reduces available acquisition
ROAE (%) 70.8
Debt/Equity (%) 2.9 targets. Given the synergies Heineken could derive from merging its beer
NB vs Breweries vs NSE ASI Performance businesses in Nigeria, its management may explore consolidating NB,
Rebased to December 31, 2009
1.6 Consolidated Breweries and the newly acquired subsidiaries. This scenario
NB NSE ASI BREWERIES
could be a potential game changer for the Nigerian beer market.
1.4 Earnings Outlook: We forecast that NB’s revenue would grow by 17.0% to
N213.55 billion by FY’11. We expect scale and cost reductions to deliver PAT of
N38.2 billion, a 37.0% increase from 2009 figures. Also, we expect EBIT
1.2
margins to increase to 26.4% by 2011 from FY’10E of 26.1%.
1
Forecast Summary FY'09A FY'10F FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F
Earnings Per Share (N) 3.69 4.25 5.05 5.93 6.90
YoY Change (%) 9% 15% 19% 17% 16%
0.8
Dec-09 Mar-10 Jun-10 Sep-10 Dec-10 Price to Earnings (x) 16.80 20.71 16.99 14.47 12.45
Source: NSE, Vetiva Research Dividend Per Share (N) 3.69 4.04 4.80 5.64 6.55
YoY Change (%) 9% 9% 19% 17% 16%
Dividend Yield (%) 5.95 4.59 5.59 6.57 7.63
Net Assets Per Share (N) 6.16 6.37 6.62 6.92 7.26
YoY Change (%) 45% 3% 4% 4% 5%
Price to Book (x) 10.07 13.81 12.96 12.41 11.82
January 2011 90
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 91
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 92
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Market Position
Nigerian Beer market size (mhl) 14.5 15.0 16.6 18.2 19.8
Beer market volume growth 16.0% 3.4% 10.6% 9.5% 8.7%
Population (mn) 147.81 151.87 156.05 160.34 164.75
Beer PCC (litres) 9.8 9.9 10.6 11.3 12.0
NB market share 57.0% 60.0% 58.0% 57.8% 57.7%
NB volume 8.3 9.0 9.6 10.5 11.4
Price/mhl 17,599.73 18,245.21 18,975.01 20,337.42 21,777.31
Growth (%)
Volume 18.1% 8.9% 6.9% 9.2% 8.5%
Price/mhl 10.2% 3.7% 4.0% 7.2% 7.1%
Turnover growth 30.2% 12.9% 11.1% 17.0% 16.2%
Core Operating profit 35.0% 13.5% 14.3% 18.4% 17.1%
Growth in EBITDA 30.6% 13.9% 12.9% 17.0% 16.2%
Growth in PBT 34.6% 10.3% 14.2% 18.9% 17.4%
Growth in PAT 35.7% 8.6% 15.1% 18.9% 17.4%
Profitability (%)
Return on Average Equity 68.2% 70.8% 67.8% 77.8% 87.6%
Return on Average Assets 26.4% 26.4% 28.6% 29.9% 30.7%
Gross Margin 48.7% 46.0% 48.0% 48.3% 48.6%
EBITDA Margin 29.2% 29.5% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0%
EBIT Margin 25.3% 25.4% 26.1% 26.4% 26.6%
Pretax Profit Margin 25.8% 25.2% 25.9% 26.3% 26.6%
Net Profit Margin 17.7% 17.0% 17.6% 17.9% 18.1%
Valuation Multiples
P/E (x) 10.1 16.8 20.7 17.0 14.5
P/B (x) 8.1 10.1 13.8 13.0 12.4
Dividend Yield (%) 9.9% 6.0% 4.6% 5.6% 6.6%
EV/EBITDA (x) 5.8 9.4 11.9 9.8 8.4
January 2011 93
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Symbol
White Goods sales growth expected, but high input costs threaten: As
Bloomberg: PZ:NL
Sector C onglomerates credit and discretionary spending gradually picks up, we expect the most
C ountry Nigeria impact to be on PZ’s high value electrical segment (especially refrigerators and
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (%) freezers). The renovation and re-launch of many of the personal and home
PZ C ussons Plc, UK 66.1
care products reflects an attempt at market share re-capture, as many
Others
SHARE STATISTICS 33.9
consumers switched to cheaper, private label alternatives following the
Shares in issue (M) 3,176.0
economic downturn of 2009. However, expectations of high input prices in
Share Price (N) 33.50
2011 would continue to weigh on costs. The announcement of a joint venture
Market C ap. (N'm) 106,396.0
agreement with the African subsidiary of Singapore-based Wilmar
Market C ap. (USD'm) 713.3
International Limited to establish a palm oil refinery as well as an edible oils,
Free Float (%) 33.92
Daily Average Value Traded
spreads and margarines business is geared toward securing the availability
(N'000) 23,309.6 and quality of oil ingredients, as well as expansion in the food and nutrition
Daily Average Value Traded
(USD'000) 156.3
category. With this backward integration (palm oil refinery expected in 2013),
Year high (N) 39.00 input cost pressure should ease going forward.
Year low (N) 24.97
VALUATION METRICS Efficiency Gains from Investment: PZ’s margins are expected to further
Book Value (N'm) 38,707.5 improve based on efficiency gains from investments in its manufacturing
Trailing P/E (x) 18.6
operations and supply chain facilities in 2009/10 (“Project Unity”; PZ’s N10
P/B (x) 2.4
Div. Yield (%) 2.9
billion investments spend). We expect efficiency gains from Project Unity to
ROAE (%) 14.3 continue to impact gross profit margin. Our expectation is a 100-150 bps
Debt/Equity (%) 6.1 increase in gross margins over the next two years owing to this investment.
PZ Cussons vs Conglomerates vs NSE ASI Performance
Rebased to December 31, 2009
1.6
Earnings Outlook: Our outlook for PZ is dampened by expectations of slack
PZ CUSSONS CONGLOMERATES NSE ASI
demand and high input costs. For FY’11 we expect a 1.4% decline in Turnover,
but PAT growth of 8.4% (N61.7 billion and N5.7 billion respectively) and a
1.4
Forward EPS of N1.81 implying a Forward PE of 18.5x and a Dividend of
N1.09.
1.2
January 2011 94
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 95
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 96
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Growth (%)
Turnover growth 21.4% 15.5% -1.8% -1.4% 15.9%
Growth in Core Operating Profit 36.9% 19.6% -0.4% 11.1% 28.3%
Growth in EBITDA 27.7% 19.9% 4.0% 7.6% 23.9%
Growth in PBT 11.7% 28.3% 3.7% 11.9% 28.0%
Growth in PAT 12.5% 22.0% 10.0% 8.4% 28.0%
Profitability (%)
Return on Equity 12.5% 14.1% 14.3% 14.4% 17.3%
Return on Assets 8.3% 9.2% 9.3% 10.1% 12.5%
Margins (%)
EBITDA/Sales 11.8% 14.6% 15.4% 16.8% 18.0%
EBIT/Sales 10.1% 12.4% 12.9% 14.5% 16.0%
Pretax Income/Sales 9.1% 12.0% 12.7% 14.4% 15.9%
Net Profit Margin 6.0% 7.6% 8.5% 9.3% 10.3%
Liquidity Ratios
Current ratio 2.3 2.2 2.2 3.3 2.7
Inventory Coverage (x) 16.1 29.3 56.8 113.0 204.6
Days in inventory 162.5 173.0 144.7 137.3 143.6
Days in accounts payable 35.9 44.4 54.5 48.2 49.4
Days in receivables 48.5 39.6 49.5 51.3 47.6
Cash Conversion Cycle 175.0 168.2 139.7 140.4 141.8
Asset Utilization
Inventory Turnover (x) 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.5
Asset Turnover (x) 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2
Fixed Assets Turnover (x) 3.2 3.2 2.7 2.6 3.0
Valuation Multiples
P/E (x) 12.7 16.5 18.8 18.5 14.5
P/B (x) 1.5 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.4
Dividend Yield (%) 3.9% 2.7% 2.7% 3.2% 4.1%
EV/EBITDA (x) 6.2 8.4 10.21 9.9 8.3
January 2011 97
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Unilever Plc
BASIC INFORMATION
Overpriced, in our view
Address 1, Billings Way, Oregun
Ikeja, Lagos
We downgrade to a “SELL” rating, given that the stock (at a current share
Website www.unilevernigeria.com price at N30.00) has an expected downside of 26.1% to N22.17, our 12 month
Management (C hairman) Apostle H.I. Alile target price. Our target valuation is based on the DCF and DDM methodology,
MD/C EO T. Boedinger
with Unilever fair value rolled one year forward at its weighted average cost of
Financial Year End December
capital. It is our belief that the stock’s price is reflective of the premium that
Exchange Listing Nigerian Stock Exchange
investor’s place on the blue-chip nature of the company, with its constant
Symbol Bloomberg: UNILEVER:NL
dividend payout and good corporate governance.
Sector C onglomerates
C ountry Nigeria Investment Thesis
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (%)
Unilever Overseas Holdings B.V. 50.0 Market leadership unchallenged across niches: The expected increased,
Odua Group of C ompanies 50.0 albeit slight, growth in consumer spending and credit environment should
SHARE STATISTICS positively impact on Unilever’s efforts, as the company continues its brand
Shares in issue (M) 3,783.3
investment in a bid to solidify her strong market presence. Product portfolio
Share Price (N) 30.00
optimization has been on the front burner with continuous product innovation
Market C ap. (N'm) 113,498.9
and retail market penetration. In the detergent market, additional market
Market C ap. (USD'm) 760.9
share has been captured with the launch of Sunlight and the re-launch of OMO
Free Float (%) 50.00
Daily Average Value Traded
which are currently gulping advert and promotional spends. In Oral care
(N'000) 53,524.5 market, where Unilever has an estimated market share of 80%, Close Up has
Daily Average Value Traded
(USD'000)
been performing quite impressively with innovative variants to ward-off
358.8
Year high (N) 31.29 competition.
Year low (N) 19.00
2011 recovery, hinged on cost savings: On the average, Unilever secures
VALUATION METRICS
Book Value (N'm) 7,394.0
about 48% of its input needs from import and this dependency has resulted in
Trailing P/E (x) 30.4 the exposure of margin to the combined risk of commodity volatility and FX
P/B (x) 14.4 movement. Savings have been achieved on finance cost which reduced by
Div. Yield (%) 2.4 77% over the past year following the 2009 deleveraging of its US$20 million
ROAE (%) 12.0
loan which infused some FX risk to earnings. Barring additional uptake of more
Debt/Equity (%) 3.8
Unilever vs Conglomerates vs NSE ASI Performance
expensive domestic borrowing, there should be no pressure on margin from
Rebased to December 31, 2009
finance cost. Apt to say that our expectation of sustained earnings rebound in
1.8
UNILEVER CONGLOMERATES 2011 is hinged on effective cost management.
1.6 Earnings Outlook: Our FY’11 projection for Sales and Earnings stands at
N53.3 billion (13.0% YoY) and N5.3 billion (25.0% YoY), hence we expect a
1.4 Forward EPS and Forward PE of N1.40 and 21.4x respectively. Our
expectations of a rebound in earnings growth in 2011 is driven by resumption
1.2
in double-digit sales growth, powerful base effect and efficiency gain.
January 2011 98
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
January 2011 99
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
Growth (%)
Profitability (%)
Return on Equity 44.3% 55.0% 49.4% 55.6% 56.2%
Return on Assets 11.8% 17.4% 17.3% 19.9% 20.8%
Margins (%)
EBITDA/Sales 14.0% 17.4% 16.0% 17.4% 17.5%
EBIT/Sales 12.0% 15.9% 14.0% 15.4% 15.5%
Pretax Income/Sales 11.1% 14.0% 13.3% 14.6% 14.7%
Net Profit Margin 6.9% 9.2% 9.0% 9.9% 10.0%
Liquidity Ratios
Asset Utilization
Valuation Multiples
P/E (x) 39.5 25.8 23.9 21.4 18.9
P/B (x) 15.3 12.9 11.3 11.3 10.0
Dividend Yield (%) 2.5% 3.8% 4.1% 4.6% 5.2%
EV/EBITDA (x) 19.5 13.6 13.4 12.2 10.7
Financial Year End December methodology, with the target price rolled forward by the weighted average
Exchange Listing Nigerian Stock Exchange cost of capital.
Symbol Bloomberg: UAC N:NL
Sector C onglometrates
Investment thesis
C ountry Nigeria
Restructuring in the Offing; UACN announced plans to restructure its
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (%)
Directors' Interest 0.9
businesses, unbundling operating divisions into limited liability companies in
Actis Africa Fund LLP 9.0 order to transform into a holding company by 2012. The first move in this
Others 90.1 direction is the merging of the UAC Foods and UAC Dairies divisions, along
SHARE STATISTICS
with their shares in the wholly-owned subsidiary, Spring Waters Nigeria
Shares in issue (M) 1,280.6
Limited, to form UAC Foods Limited. We expect the company to seek viable
Share Price (N) 39.00
opportunities for partnerships to boost its other business lines and laud the
Market C ap. (N'm) 49,942.5
company’s priority of growing the logistics business, boosting the Grand
Market C ap. (USD'm) 334.8
Cereals and Oil Mills business as well as repositioning the UAC Restaurants
Free Float (%) 90.13 division. We expect growth in the properties arm of the company (UPDC), to
Daily Average Value Traded
(N'000) 55,692.2
be muted this year as credit to the private sector for mortgages may remain
Daily Average Value Traded slow, boosted slightly by annuity property such as the Golden Tulip Hotel and
(USD'000) 373.3
Year high (N) 58.48
cost savings from cheaper, longer term financing.
Year low (N) 36.16
VALUATION METRICS
Brand Portfolio Expansion on New Joint Venture with Tiger Brands:
Book Value (N'm) 39,527.8 The resultant lower consumer discretionary spending, tighter credit as well as
Trailing P/E (x) 20.2 higher energy costs following the economic downturn significantly affected the
P/B (x) 1.5
dairy products, real estate and restaurant businesses. UACN’s Joint Venture
Div. Yield (%) 3.2
agreement (in principle) with Tiger Brands Limited of South Africa to sell 49%
ROAE (%) 23.8
Debt/Equity (%) 28.8 of the authorized shares of the resulting UAC Foods Limited is expected to
UACN vs Conglomerates vs NSE ASI Performance
Rebased to December 31, 2009
provide brand portfolio expansion as well as renewed growth prospects and
efficiencies for the business and its contribution to the UACN Group.
1.8
UACN CONGLOMERATES NSE ASI
Earnings Outlook: With its vibrant agri-business, the inherent potential for
1.6
UPDC in Nigeria’s huge housing deficit, we forecast FY’11 turnover growth of of
19.3% and After Tax Earnings growth of 18.5% (N59.9bn and N4.5bn) and a
1.4
Forward EPS of N2.81 implying a Forward PE of 14.41x and Dividend of N1.98.
1.2
Growth (%)
Profitability (%)
Valuation Multiples
With far reaching reforms in the pipeline in the oil, gas and power segments of
the Energy industry, electioneering for the April polls seems to be shifting the
focus of the legislators, and also the ability of the executive arm of government
to focus on implementation. We note that for most segments, less activity on
the reforms would be felt pre-election, whilst the Government is likely to put
more focus on the pressing issues in the Energy Industry, post-elections.
We expect the major review of the Multi Year Tariff Order (MYTO) to be
completed during the course of the year as part of the Federal government
plans to revamp the Power Sector. Notably, a new Board for the Nigerian
Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), was recently inaugurated, and would
Implementing the power sector
roadmap in 2011, we expect the be responsible for the completion of the major tariff review. The review which
retail tariff structure to be comes ahead of its initial 2013 schedule is expected to fully reflect the
increased by as much as 100% necessary costs in the generation, transmission and distribution segments, so
as to guarantee the financial viability of the potential private investments in the
Nigerian Power Sector. With interests burgeoning in the sector, partly fuelled by
the incumbent President’s initiation of an implementation roadmap for the
previously stalled Power Sector Reforms, we believe that the tariff review would
be completed by the April 2011 timeline posited by the NERC Board, whilst
actual implementation should follow within the year. We expect the retail tariff
structure to be increased by as much as 100%, as the current tariffs are far
below what is obtainable in other African countries and cost reflective estimates
by the Presidential Task Force on Power (PFTP).
50 51.00
44.36
40
38.22
30
27.82
26.61 22.00
24.77 24.51
23.33
20
16.85
15.48
10 13.05
7.00
*Rates incurred by the consumer, whilst the government paid a subsidy of N3.64
**Based on an analysis by the Presidential Task Force on Power (PTFP)
Though some of the key milestones of the Roadmap, such as the target
generation level for December 2010 and April 2011, the conclusion of the MYTO
review, and the approval of the Expression of Interests (EOI’s) for power
Despite delay in achieving key
milestones, we believe progress generating companies, were initially scheduled for end January 2011, we
will be made in the course of year. believe that the reform process is still much on track. More progress would be
This will be well supported of the made in the course of the year, which we anticipate would lead to the
incumbent president returns to completion of key milestones such as the privatisation and concessioning of the
power after the April elections generation companies, while divesting interests in the distribution companies.
However, we hold that political factors, such as a possible change in the
incumbent Federal Government post-elections, would likely slow down the
implementation of the Roadmap.
We expect that progress on the all encompassing reform bill for the Oil and Gas
industry would stall in the first half of the year, as members of both legislative
chambers shift focus from their primary legislative duties to the April elections,
and in most cases, their personalised re-election bids. Also, slight changes in
Passage of the PIB will likely stall
till H2’11 the post-election legislature might also increase the time span to passage, as
some key proponents who have been involved in the Bill’s procession in the
National Assembly are likely not to return to the legislative chambers. Notably,
the Chairman, Senate Committee on Petroleum Resources (Upstream), Senator
Lee Maeba, who has been in the forefront of the Bill’s procession and
amendments in the upper chamber, recently lost his primaries re-election bid
under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Given the foregoing, we expect
significant national discourse on the legislation to really resume in the second
half of the year, where pressing clauses which are currently in contention would
again take centre stage. Such contentious issues include the increased oil take
of the Federal Government through higher royalties and taxes, revised fiscal
framework for offshore projects, amendment on a 10% equity stake for the
communities etc. We note also that the initial bill, as proposed by the Oil and
Gas Sector Reform Implementation Committee, has gone through a series of
amendments, taking in some concerns of the stakeholders.
Whilst the Minister of Petroleum had repeatedly, in the last year, expressed
optimism about the licensing round for new oil blocks and a marginal field bid
program, both rounds failed to take place in 2010. We anticipate that the
Government would again broach the idea of holding the rounds this year.
However, due to current stalemate with the passage of the Petroleum Industry
Bill (PIB) and the April elections, we believe that if such an oil bid round holds it
would be in the second half of the year, post-elections.
Firstly, we judge that a pre-election round would not generate the required
The Next oil licensing rounds are confidence from the participating Oil and Gas companies, who can recall the
likely to held post – elections and litigations and license withdrawals that trailed the 2007 licensing rounds.
passage of the PIB Moreover, the multi-national oil companies would be more comfortable with
knowing the contents of the final version or reforming legislation (PIB), to
guarantee that they have a fair idea of the contractual terms for which they are
bidding.
With the new gas pricing initiative, the traditional complain of inadequate gas
supply to the power plants should subside, as the pricing framework can
With the new gas pricing support the gas production initiatives from the Oil Companies. Also, the
initiative, the traditional complain
implementation of robust commercial agreements between the power plants
of inadequate gas supply to the
power plants should subside, as and the oil companies, as well as a partial risk guarantee by the World Bank,
the pricing framework can support should increase the confidence level in gas suppliers that they would receive
the gas production initiatives from payments for their supplies, especially from the government controlled power
the Oil Companies. plants, which have had a history of defaulting in payments. The impact of this
revisions have started feeding through, as reflected by the delivery of 50mscf
of gas to the Nigerian Gas Company from Pan Ocean’s Ogharefe plant from
November 2010, following an agreement between Panocean/NNPC JV and the
Egbin Power Plant for the supply of 65mscf/day in June 2010 for a ten year
period.
The pricing framework would also reduce the volatility previously witnessed by
manufacturers in periods of high oil prices, when the reflective price of Low
Pour Fuel Oil (LPFO) is upwardly driven. Consequently, the cap of $2/mcf up
until 2012 would ensure that natural gas prices to manufacturers stays stable
around its current prices. This should provide a hedge for most manufacturers
in the current year, when oil prices are trending higher.
Downstream Marketing
NNPC to play a more active role in the mix
Though the major product importer into the country, the NNPC, had given
guidance of two ‘crude for refined products swap deals’ in December 2010,
which should cater for half of the country’s import requirements, there are no
clear indications how it would be priced. Consequently, as oil prices inch up
during the year, we expect the hikes to reflect in the prices of unregulated
products like Aviation Turbine Kerosene (ATK), Automotive Gas Oil (AGO) and
Low Pour Fuel Oil (LPFO), while the impact on regulated products like Premium
Motor Spirit (PMS) would be borne by the government, unless a policy shift is
effected.
120
99%
90 176%
65.00
60 50.00
30
-
Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) House Hold Kerosene (HHK)
BASIC INFORMATION
Oando Plc
Address 2, Ajose Adeogun Street
Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria
An Outlet to Ride the Opportunities in the Energy Space
Website www.oandoplc.com At our slightly revised DCF valuation for the energy conglomerate, we obtain a
Management J A Tinubu (Group Chief Executive) target range of N95.79 – N105.28. This indicates a midpoint of N100.38,
O Boyo (D/Group Chief Executive) which underpins an upside potential of 32% relative to the stock’s current
Financial Year End December price. We note also that our valuation on its high margin Exploration &
Exchange Listing
Primary Listing: Nigerian Stock Production Business is based on a conservative $80/bbl crude oil price and
Exchange
moderated growth rates in oil production volumes, peaking at 9,080 bpd in
Secondary Listing: Johannesburg
Stock Exchange 2015. We judge that near term acquisitions of producing assets through
Symbol Bloomberg: OANDO:NL
various outlets and the inflow of funds from its marketing subsidiary (OML)
divestment has the potential of increasing our valuation range by >20%. Thus,
Sector Petroleum Marketing
we maintain a “BUY” rating.
Country Nigeria
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE Investment Thesis
Shareholders % Ownership The upstream and midstream upside. Oando has invested extensively in
Ocean & Oil Invstmnts 24.67 the upstream and midstream segments of the energy value chain. This gives
Others 75.33 the company interests in 11 upstream assets and ownership of an extensive
SHARE STATISTICS gas pipeline infrastructure in Lagos and the South East, with plans to extend
coverage to other states in the South West. Our base estimates on Oando’s
Shares in issue (Mn) 1,810.17
business segments proffer a >20% PBT CAGR to 2015, in both Exploration &
Share Price (N) 75.00
Production and Gas & Power Divisions, while the Energy Services Division has
Market Cap. (N'm) 135,762.75
an intrinsic potential PBT CAGR of >50%.
Market Cap. (USD'm) 910.12
Free Float (%) 75.33 Industry reforms should provide added advantage. Favourable
Daily Average Value Traded (N'000) 147,238.56 conclusion of the ongoing reforms in Nigeria’s Oil and Gas sector, which would
Daily Average Value Traded (USD'000) 987.05
result in the passage of the much debated Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB),
Year High (N) 128.50
should increase, geometrically, the company’s potential. As an indigenous
player, the legislation, would allow more upstream acquisitions, international
Year Low (N) 53.00
partnerships’ and favourable fiscal terms.
VALUATION METRICS
Earnings Outlook; We anticipate a 15% YoY growth in the Group’s aggregate
Book Value (N'm) 78,961.00
revenues to N432.3 billion for FY’11, while we forecast that PAT would grow
P/E (x) 12.78
more aggressively, by c.31% to N13.9 billion. Fuelled by increased
Price/Book (x) 1.57
contributions from its Exploration & Production Division, improved margins in
Div. Yield (%) 3.19%
its Gas & Power and Energy Services Divisions, we believe that aggregate EBIT
ROE (%) 20.56
and PBT margins would improve to 7.6% and 5.2% in FY’11, from our
Debt/Equity (%) 303.31 estimates of 7.3% and 4.7% respectively in FY’10.
OANDO vs PM INDEX VS NSE ASI
Forecast
1.50
Summary FY'09A FY'10F* FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F FY'14F
OANDO PLC PMIndex NSE ASI
EPS (N) 11.16 5.87 7.67 9.60 11.34 12.87
1.30 YoY Change (%) 21.00 -47.37 30.58 25.26 18.09 13.50
P/E (x) 8.43 13.45 10.30 8.22 6.96 6.14
1.10 DPS (N) 3.00 1.46 1.91 2.39 2.82 3.20
YoY Change (%) -50.00 -51.32 30.58 25.26 18.09 13.50
0.90 Div. Yield (%) 3.19 1.85 2.41 3.02 3.57 4.05
NAPS (N) 58.91 47.69 53.51 60.81 69.42 79.20
0.70 YoY Change (%) 18.77 -19.05 12.21 13.63 14.17 14.08
P/B (x) 1.60 1.66 1.48 1.30 1.14 1.00
0.50 Source: Company Financials, Vetiva Research
4-Jan 4-Apr 3-Jul 1-Oct 30-Dec *The Company’s FY’10 outstanding shares includes additional shares from its scrip and right issues,
Source: NSE; Vetiva Research
effectively doubling in its issued shares with obvious effects on its’Per Share’ metrics
Income Statement (N' Mill) 2007 2008 2009 2010F 2011F 2012F
Turnover 185,892 339,420 336,860 376,984 432,291 485,625
Cost of Sales -164,443 -295,714 -301,283 -326,092 -373,931 -420,066
Gross Profit 21,449 43,706 35,577 50,893 58,359 65,559
Core Operating Profit 6,249 20,838 15,824 30,152 36,582 42,693
Other Operating Income 2,471 1,816 11,713 2,945 2,724 3,066
EBITDA 8,720 22,655 27,538 33,097 39,306 45,759
EBIT/Operating Profit 7,239 16,862 21,767 27,384 33,022 38,847
Interest Payable & Similar charges -1,297 -10,668 -11,826 -13,600 -14,960 -16,007
Interest received 871 4,549 3,571 3,928 4,321 4,753
Profit Before Taxation 6,814 10,743 13,512 17,713 22,383 27,593
Taxation -1,333 -2,399 -3,415 -7,085 -8,506 -10,209
PAT 5,480 8,343 10,097 10,628 13,878 17,383
Income Statement ($' Million) 2007 2008 2009 2010F 2011F 2012F
Turnover 1,246 2,275 2,258 2,527 2,898 3,256
Cost of Sales -1,102 -1,982 -2,020 -2,186 -2,507 -2,816
Gross Profit 144 293 239 341 391 439
Core Operating Profit 42 140 106 202 245 286
Other Operating Income 17 12 79 20 18 21
EBITDA 58 152 185 222 263 307
EBIT/Operating Profit 49 113 146 184 221 260
Interest Payable & Similar charges -9 -72 -79 -91 -100 -107
Interest received 6 30 24 26 29 32
Profit Before Taxation 46 72 91 119 150 185
Taxation -9 -16 -23 -47 -57 -68
PAT 37 56 68 71 93 117
Share capital 3 3 3 6 6 6
Share premium account 200 199 199 338 338 338
Revaluation Reserves 71 48 48 71 71 71
Retained Earnings 42 49 100 153 223 309
Shareholders' Equity 317 300 351 568 638 725
MOBIL VS PM INDEX VS NSE ASI Forecast Summary FY'09A FY'10F FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F
EPS (N) 9.46 12.68 12.93 14.34 17.22
2.20
MOBIL PMIndex NSE ASI YoY Change (%) 65.34 34.11 1.95 10.87 20.12
2.00
P/E (x) 10.45 11.12 10.90 9.84 8.19
1.80
DPS (N) 7.00 10.78 10.99 12.19 14.64
1.60
YoY Change (%) 40.00 54.01 1.95 10.87 20.12
1.40
Div. Yield (%) 7.09 7.65 7.79 8.64 10.38
1.20
NAPS (N) 13.90 15.80 17.74 19.89 22.47
1.00 YoY Change (%) 47.23 13.69 12.27 12.12 12.99
0.80 P/B (x) 7.11 8.92 7.95 7.09 6.27
0.60
4-Jan 4-Apr 3-Jul 1-Oct 30-Dec
Sources: Company Financials, Vetiva Research
Income Statement (N' Million) 2007 2008 2009 2010F 2011F 2012F
Profitability
Return on Equity 44.5% 67.6% 81.0% 85.4% 77.1% 76.2%
Return on Assets 6.3% 8.9% 13.5% 16.5% 15.6% 16.0%
Return On Total Capital 28.2% 34.4% 44.7% 56.0% 53.4% 57.0%
Operating ROE 104.9% 144.8% 124.7% 125.1% 120.2% 118.2%
Operating ROA 14.8% 19.1% 20.8% 24.2% 24.3% 24.8%
Margins
Gross Profit 12.0% 11.1% 12.5% 14.0% 14.0% 14.0%
EBITDA/Sales 5.9% 6.3% 8.0% 10.5% 10.7% 10.9%
EBIT/Sales 4.9% 5.5% 7.0% 9.4% 9.7% 9.9%
Exceptional Item -1.6% -1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Pretax Income/Sales 3.2% 3.8% 6.6% 9.2% 8.9% 9.2%
Net Profit Margin 2.1% 2.6% 4.6% 6.4% 6.2% 6.4%
Asset Utiisation
Sales to Cash (x) 410.2 1,113.1 2,845.6 230.3 3,837.8 594.6
Inventory Turnover (x) 16.7 17.1 14.2 12.3 11.7 11.5
Asset turnover (x) 2.9 3.4 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.4
Fixed Assets (x) 6.3 6.6 5.3 4.7 4.7 4.7
Liquidity Ratios
Cash ratio (x) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Current ratio (x) 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8
Acid Test (x) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Interest Coverage (x) 9.7 9.1 8.3 9.7 9.8 10.3
Days in inventory (x) 24.8 24.0 29.4 34.5 36.1 36.8
Days in accounts payable (x) 60.3 35.7 53.6 68.5 70.5 69.8
Days in receivables (x) 31.3 23.9 27.6 31.8 33.3 33.9
Cash Conversion Cycle -4.2 12.2 3.4 -2.2 -1.0 0.9
Capital Structure
Interest bearing debt/Total assets 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Debt to Total Capital 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2
Payout ratio 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9
Total equity/Total assets 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Retention ratio 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2
Financial Leverage 8.26 7.02 5.28 5.08 4.85 4.69
Per Share Data
EPS 4.71 5.72 9.46 12.68 12.93 14.34
DPS 4.70 5.00 7.00 10.78 10.99 12.19
NAPS 9.35 9.44 13.90 15.80 17.74 19.89
Sales/Share 226.88 222.10 206.43 197.14 207.00 223.56
EBITDA/Share 13.44 14.02 16.60 20.75 22.24 24.48
VALUATION METRICS Earnings Outlook. We expect revenues to record a 13% YoY growth to
N185.6 billion for FY’11, while we anticipate that its PAT would moderate by
Boo k Value (N'm) 8,367.00
17% YoY to N4.4 billion. We recall that the FY’10 earnings were boosted by an
P/E (x) 15.16
1.40
DPS (N) 11.68 15.19 12.63 15.51 17.67
YoY Change (%) -9.67 30.03 -16.81 22.74 13.98
1.20
Div. Yield (%) 7.84 6.49 5.40 6.63 7.55
1.00
NAPS (N) 20.57 20.88 21.13 21.45 21.81
0.80
YoY Change (%) -3.94 1.51 1.24 1.50 1.68
0.60 P/B (x) 7.24 11.21 11.07 10.91 10.73
4-Jan 4-Apr 3-Jul 1-Oct 30-Dec
Sources: Company Financials, Vetiva Research
Source: NSE; Vetiva Research
Income Statement (N' Million) 2007 2008 2009 2010F 2011F 2012F
Turnover 137,340 177,412 178,570 164,285 185,642 207,919
Cost of Sales (120,410) (158,265) (156,571) (140,463) (159,652) (178,810)
Gross Profit 16,930 19,147 22,000 23,821 25,990 29,109
Core Operating Profit 4,993 6,372 7,181 7,237 7,428 8,992
Other Operating Income 671 1,157 644 709 780 858
EBITDA 5,664 7,529 7,825 7,946 8,208 9,850
EBIT/Operating Profit 4,635 6,434 6,546 6,538 6,659 8,146
Interest Payable (77) (269) (516) (362) (416) (478)
Profit on Ordinary Activities 4,829 6,508 6,163 6,338 6,437 7,900
Exceptional Item - - - 1,400 - -
Profit Before Taxation 4,829 6,508 6,163 7,738 6,437 7,900
Taxation -1,573 -2,115 -2,195 -2,476 -2,060 -2,528
PAT 3,255 4,393 3,968 5,262 4,377 5,372
Income Statement ($' Million) 2007 2008 2009 2010F 2011F 2012F
Turnover 921 1,189 1,197 1,101 1,244 1,394
Cost of Sales (807) (1,061) (1,050) (942) (1,070) (1,199)
Gross Profit 113 128 147 160 174 195
Core Operating Profit 33 43 48 49 50 60
Other Operating Income 5 8 4 5 5 6
EBITDA 38 50 52 53 55 66
EBIT/Operating Profit 31 43 44 44 45 55
Interest Payable (1) (2) (3) (2) (3) (3)
Profit on Ordinary Activities 32 44 41 42 43 53
Exceptional Item - - - 9 - -
Profit Before Taxation 32 44 41 52 43 53
Taxation -11 -14 -15 -17 -14 -17
PAT 22 29 27 35 29 36
Share Capital 1 1 1 1 1 1
Capital reserve 2 2 2 2 2 2
General reserve 40 46 44 45 45 46
Shareholder's Fund 42 49 47 48 48 49
Net Assets 27 13 20 28 35 42
Profitability (%)
Return on Equity -7.6% 43.1% 49.9% 35.4% 36.8%
Return on Assets -1.4% 7.5% 10.5% 9.4% 11.7%
Return On Total Capital -7.6% 43.1% 49.9% 35.4% 36.8%
Operating ROE -13.0% 69.2% 72.3% 51.0% 53.2%
Operating ROA -2.4% 12.1% 15.2% 13.6% 16.9%
Margins (%)
Gross Profit 8.8% 7.5% 9.0% 9.0% 9.5%
EBITDA/Sales 0.6% 3.1% 4.2% 4.0% 4.6%
EBIT/Sales -0.8% 2.3% 3.4% 3.1% 3.6%
Exceptional Item 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Pretax Income/Sales -0.6% 2.3% 3.4% 3.1% 3.7%
Net Profit Margin -0.5% 1.4% 2.3% 2.1% 2.5%
Capital Structure
Payout ratio 0.0% 30.2% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%
Total equity/Total assets 16.9% 17.9% 23.9% 29.5% 33.8%
Retention ratio 100.0% 69.8% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Financial Leverage 5.9 5.6 4.2 3.4 3.0
1.80
Forecast Summary FY'09A FY'10F FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F
EPS (N) 3.33 3.21 3.68 4.24 5.48
1.60
1.20
P/E (x) 23.53 12.50 10.90 9.46 7.33
DPS (N) 1.50 1.61 1.84 2.12 2.74
1.00
YoY Change (%) 50.00 7.04 14.72 15.12 29.11
0.80
Div. Yield (%) 1.91 4.00 4.59 5.28 6.82
0.60
NAPS (N) 19.47 21.08 22.92 25.04 27.78
4-Jan 4-Apr 3-Jul 1-Oct 30-Dec
YoY Change (%) 13.59 8.25 8.74 9.25 10.93
P/B (x) 4.03 1.90 1.75 1.60 1.45
Sources: Company Financials, Vetiva Research
Income Statement (N' Million) 2007 2008 2009 2010F 2011F 2012F
Income Statement ($' Million) 2007 2008 2009 2010F 2011F 2012F
Stocks 50 44 27 30 32 36
Debtors & Prepayments 147 184 114 126 141 157
Cash and bank balances 6 98 71 63 61 59
Total Current Assets 204 326 212 219 235 252
Total Assets 264 381 267 279 301 325
Current Liabilities
Total Current Liabilities 163 288 161 165 179 192
Net Current Assets/(Liabilities) 41 37 51 54 56 59
Total Assets Less Current Liabilities 101 93 106 114 122 132
Non-Current liabilities
Deferred taxation 9 7 10 10 10 10
Retirement benefit obligation 7 - - - - -
Provision 3 3 3 3 3 3
Staff Retirement benefits 3 3 3 3 3 3
Total Non-Current Liabilities 21 13 15 15 15 16
Total Liabiities 205 314 191 196 210 224
Capital and Reserves
Share capital 2 2 2 2 2 2
General reserve 35 35 45 53 61 71
Revaluation Reserve 17 17 17 17 17 17
Shareholders' Fund 80 80 91 98 107 116
Building Materials
Our focus on the building materials sector is on the cement producers given
The cement sector is set to
witness major boost in supply their dominance in the sector. The outlook for the cement producers follows
though minimal consumption from our overall expectations of slow infrastructure development in the near
growth is expected term. In line with the additional capacities (13.2 million tonnes per annum)
expected to come from Dangote Cement and Lafarge WAPCO this year, the
sector is set to witness a major boost in cement supply. Therefore, the
dynamics of cement supply would even change further as imports become quite
negligible.
Construction
1.05
Forecast Summary FY'09* FY'10F FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F
Dangcem BMIndex ASI
EPS (N) 3.97 6.64 12.83 17.85 20.65
1.00 YoY Change (%) 76.4 67.3 93.2 39.1 15.7
P/E (x) 31.9 19.9 10.3 7.4 6.4
0.95 DPS (N) 2 4.98 9.32 12.96 14.99
YoY Change (%) 0 149 87.1 39.1 15.7
0.90 Div. Yield (%) 1.6 3.8 7.1 9.8 11.3
NAPS (N) 10.2 12.23 15.74 20.61 25.42
0.85 YoY Change (%) 117 19.9 28.7 30.9 23.3
Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10
P/B (x) 27 10.8 8.4 6.4 5.2
Sources: NSE, Vetiva Research
Country Nigeria
Rising costs savings: The most compelling attraction to Ashaka Cement, in
our view, is its potential to sustain long term efficiency and profitability despite
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (%)
Lafarge (foreign) 50.2
its relatively low scale of production. According to management’s insights, the
company can achieve 60% -70% savings in energy costs, when full
Others 49.8
substitution of LPFO with coal is achieved. Nonetheless, we have discounted
SHARE STATISTICS
management’s expectation and assumed only a 55% savings in energy costs.
Shares in issue (M) 2,240
Share Price (N)
Whilst noting that Ashaka will not likely meet its projection oncoal utilisation
29.49
Market Cap. (N'm)
level in 2010, (management achieved only coal utilisation rate as at half year
66,057.6
relative to a 60% projection), we still maintain long term optimism on its
Market Cap. (USD'm) 442.8
operating efficiency, though we have adjusted our expectation to reflect a long
Free Float (%) 49.8
time frame for the company to reach peak (c.100%) coal utilisation.
Daily Average Value Traded (N'000) 38,136.90
Therefore, we project that EBITDA margins would increase to 35% by FY’12
Daily Average Value Traded (USD'000) 255.6
and 42% by FY’15 (from 9% at FY’09). Similarly, we forecast an EBIT margin
Year high (N) 28.5 of 32% by FY’12 and 40% by FY’15, (from 5.9% at FY’09)
Debt/Equity (%) 0 Earnings Outlook: We forecast that Ashaka’s revenue would grow by 15.6%
to N21.0 billion by FY’11. Consistent with our expectations on Ashaka’s
ASHAKACEM VS BM VS NSE ASI PERFORMANCE
Rebased 31/12/2009
operating efficiency; we project that EBITDA margins would rise to 35.8% by
2.5
FY’11 from 8.9% at FY’09 and FY’10E of 24.6%. Also, we expect EBIT margins
Ashaka BMIndex ASI
to increase to 31% by 2011 from 5.9% as at FY’09 and FY’10E of 19.3%.
INCOME STATEMENT (N'Mill) 2006 2007 2008 2009 F 2010 F 2011 F 2012 F
Turnover 16,772 16,473 21,378 17,194 18,189 21,025 23,358
Cost of Sales (8,794) (10,868) (14,039) (11,771) (11,846) (10,132) (9,792)
Gross Profit 7,978 5,605 7,339 5,423 6,343 10,893 13,566
Selling and distri. Expenses (2,408) (1,486) (1,437) (432) (771) (1,472) (1,635)
Core Operating Profit 5,570 4,120 5,902 4,991 5,572 9,421 11,931
EBITDA 5,948 4,452 2,697 3,785 1,533 4,481 7,529
Depreciation & Amortization (436) (514) (519) (526) (966) (1,008) (1,054)
EBIT/Operating Profit 4,016 2,183 3,265 1,007 3,515 6,521 8,774
Interest Payable & Charges - - - - - - -
Profit Before Taxation 4,952 2,513 3,430 1,324 3,515 6,521 8,774
Taxation (1,574) (1,361) (911) (1,422) (984) (2,152) (2,808)
Profit After Taxation 3,378 1,153 2,519 943 2,531 4,369 5,966
Dividends 1,087 1,106 597 - 1,126 1,944 2,655
Retained Earnings 2,291 47 1,922 943 1,405 2,425 3,311
BALANCE SHEET (N'Mill) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 F 2011 F 2012 F
Non-Current Assets
Fixed Assets 2,685 3,811 5,686 5,218 19,478 19,522 19,635
Work in Progress 5,333 8,891 10,901 13,849 2,981 3,030 3,031
Current Assets
Inventories 4,931 4,220 4,706 4,707 5,017 4,292 4,148
Debtors 1,674 386 139 88 100 115 128
Bank and cash balances 3,798 2,137 1,636 850 508 5,062 9,085
Other Receivables and Current Assets - 2,785 1,958 908 1,200 1,388 1,542
Total Current Assets 10,403 9,528 8,440 6,552 6,826 10,856 14,902
Total Assets 18,421 22,230 25,027 25,618 29,285 33,408 37,568
Current Liabilities
Creditors & Accruals 887 1,151 1,921 2,296 1,099 1,986 2,206
Other Creditors 3,341 6,164 7,269 5,967 4,892 5,655 6,283
Short Term Loan - 968 - - - - -
Taxation 1,661 1,687 928 1,385 984 2,152 2,808
Total Current Liabilities 5,890 9,971 10,117 9,648 6,976 9,792 11,296
Non-current Liabilities
Long-Term Loans - - - - - - -
Provision for Gratuity 408 836 982 1,648 2,862 1,994 1,610
Deferred Taxation 526 710 1,144 1,181 1,920 1,621 1,349
Total Non-Current Liabilities 934 1,546 2,125 2,829 4,783 3,615 2,959
Total Liabilities 6,824 11,518 12,242 12,477 11,758 13,407 14,255
Net Assets 11,598 10,713 12,785 13,142 14,085 15,489 17,914
BASIC INFORMATION
CCNN Plc
Address Kilometre 10, Kalambaina Road,
Operational Uncertainties Dampen Earnings Outlook
Sokoto State, Nigeria
Website www.sokotocement.com We maintain a “SELL” rating on CCNN, given that the stock (at a current share
Management price at N14.52) has an expected downside of 55% to N8.05 the midpoint of
(C hairman) Abdulsamad Rabiu
our target price range N7.60 – N9.30 Our target valuation is based on the DCF
Managing Director Alf Karlsen
and EV/EBITDA methodology.
Financial Year End December
Primary Listing: Nigerian Stock Investment thesis
Exchange Listing Exchange
Symbol Bloomberg: C C NN:NL Present capacity inadequate to sustain market share: CCNN is the
Sector Building Materials last of the cement producers to announce definitive plans around its
C ountry Nigeria expansion. While there have been indications from management that the
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (%) company may expand capacity to 1.4 million tonnes, timelines and funding for
BUA Group 51 the expansion are still unclear. Compounded by its obsolete state, CCNN’s
Nasdal Bap Limited 11.6 500,000 tonnes plant is grossly inadequate to position the company
Kebbi, Sokoto, Kaduna, others 15 competitively in the industry. We highlight that CCNN has one of the highest
Other Nigerians 15 cement prices in the industry, evidently as a result of its higher energy costs,
Ferrostal A.G 0.1 relatively obsolete technology and small production capacity. Due to supply
Dantata Invst. & Sec. 7.1 deficit which has historically plagued the Nigerian cement industry and CCNN’s
SHARE STATISTICS relative isolation in North-West Nigeria, revenue growth has been somewhat
Shares in issue (M) 1,256 sustained through price increases. We recall in 2009 that the company
Share Price (N) 14.52 increased its cement price (per tonne) by c.12% and has consistently hiked
prices YoY since 2006. In-fact in FY’09 earnings, c.60% of revenue growth
Market C ap. (N'Mn) 18,073.80 came from the 12% increase in price. However, in our view, CCNN is unlikely
Market C ap. (USD'm) 121.2
to continue to enjoy such revenue growth from price increases as it has
historically done.
Free Float (%) 15
Daily Average Value Increasing cost exert additional pressure on top-line: CCNN is still
Traded (N'000) 17,249.30
Daily Average Value
having challenges getting around its increasing energy costs to remain
Traded (USD'000) 115.6 efficient and adequately profitable. In its FY’09 accounts, management had
Year high (N) 25.9 stated the huge increase in energy costs (c.40%) arising from transportation
Year low (N) 12.7
expenses incurred in moving imported LPFO from the south to its plant
VALUATION METRICS (located in Sokoto, North-West Nigeria).
Book Value (N'm) 4,465.00 Earnings Outlook: We forecast that revenue would grow by 6.5% to N11.9
Trailing P/E (x) 19.6 billion by 2011 from our FY’10E of N11.2 billion. We believe EBITDA margins
P/B(x) 3.9 would remain relatively flat at 14.5% based on our FY’10 and FY’11 estimates.
Div. Yield (%) 6.3 Also, we project that EBIT margins would remain flat at 11.3% in FY’10 and
ROAE (%) 44.2 FY’11.
Debt/Equity (%) 12
Forecast Summary FY'09 FY'10F FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F
CCNN VS BM VS NSE ASI PERFORMANCE
Rebased 31/12/2009 EPS (N) 1.44 0.62 0.66 0.72 0.88
2.1
CCNN BMIndex ASI
YoY Change (%) 18.0 -56.9 6.5 9.1 21.8
P/E (x) 10.08 23.42 22.00 20.17 16.56
1.8
DPS (N) 0.90 0.23 0.25 0.27 0.33
YoY Change (%) 0.0 -74.4 8.7 8.0 22.9
1.5
Div. Yield (%) 6.2 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.3
NAPS (N) 3.36 3.74 4.15 4.6 5.15
1.2
Sector Construction
Strong earnings prospect...Julius Berger remains the strongest listed
Country Nigeria
construction firm; its history of proven job quality in the Nigerian construction
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE (%)
space is largely unrivaled. In view of the rising emphasis on physical
Bilfinger 49.9
infrastructural development in Nigeria, we believe it is necessary for investors
Lagos State Govt. 10.1 to have some exposure to such infrastructure-linked equities like Julius Berger
Benue State Govt. 5.3 in a bid to benefit directly from the expected boom in the longer term. The
Others 34.8 renewed interest in the power sector also offers Julius Berger some growth
SHARE STATISTICS opportunities; we believe the company would participate actively in the
Shares in issue (M) 1,200 construction works in the power sector due to its dominant market share in
Share Price (N) 54.00 FG’s construction contracts
Market Cap. (N'm) 62,388.00
...though reputational risk calls for caution: Julius Berger, towards the tail
Market Cap. (USD'M ) 418.2
end of Q3’10 agreed to a plea bargain over its alleged involvement in the $180
Free Float (%) 34.8 million bribery scandal between Halliburton and the Federal Government of
Daily Average Value Nigeria. The company was consequently required to pay $29.5 million fine (c.
Traded (N'000) 23,099.90
Daily Average Value N4.425 billion), payable in two instalments. We had noted (in our previous
Traded (USD'000) 154.8 earnings update on Julius Berger) the impact of Julius Berger’s rising
Year high (N)
reputational risk on its earnings profile. Though the company is given the
61.88
opportunity to pay the legal fine in the Halliburton case in two instalments, we
Year low (N) 25.79 believe the liability would have some major impact on FY’10 and FY’11 net -
VALUATION METRICS earnings and more importantly cash flows, especially because of the
Book Value (N'Mn) 6,972 characteristically low profit margins of the business.
Trailing P/E (x) 20.7
Earnings Outlook: We forecast that Julius Berger’s revenue would grow by
P/B (x) 9.3
15.0% to N184.3.0 billion by FY’11 from our FY’10E of N160.3 billion. On
Div. Yield (%) 4.7
profitability we anticipate that EBITDA margins would somewhat be steady at
ROAE (%) 45.6
14.4% by FY’11, having declined from 15.4% to 14.4% (our estimate for
Debt/Equity (%) 0
FY’10). Also, we expect EBIT margins to decline 3.6% from our FY’10E of
JBERGER VS BM VS NSE ASI PERFORMANCE
Rebased 31/12/2009
5.7% and FY’09 figure of 3.6%.
2.5
JBerger Const. Index ASI
Forecast Summary FY'09 FY'10F FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F
EPS (N) 2.70 2.80 2.90 4.00 5.02
1.9 YoY Change (%) 28.6 3.7 3.6 37.9 25.5
P/E (x) 9.55 19.3 18.6 13.5 10.8
DPS (N) 2.40 2.40 2.50 3.40 4.28
1.3
YoY Change (%) 33.3 0.0 4.2 36.0 25.8
Div. Yield (%) 9.3 4.4 4.6 6.3 7.9
NAPS (N) 6.50 6.90 7.40 8.00 8.70
0.6
Dec-09 Apr-10 Aug-10 Dec-10 YoY Change (%) 18.2 6.2 7.2 8.1 8.7
Sources: NSE, Vetiva Research P/B (x) 4.0 7.8 7.3 6.8 6.2
Sources: Company Financials, Vetiva Research
Growth
Turnover growth 39.0 44.2 31.9 6.6 15.0 20.0
EBITDA Growth 13.1 45.6 81.9 -0.5 15.0 20.0
PBT Growth 182.8 66.2 80.2 -23.5 -28.2 37.6
PAT Growth 6008.9 41.8 31.6 2.5.0 4.3 37.6
Profitability
Return on Average Equity 36.3 40.9 45.6 41.9 41.1 52.7
Return on Average Assets 2.0 2.2% 2.3 2.0 1.6 1.9
EBITDA Margin 11.1 11.2% 15.4 14.4 14.4 14.4
EBIT Margin 3.6 4.0% 5.1 6.8 5.7 3.6
PBT Margin 4.0 4.6% 6.3 4.5 2.8 3.2
With the Nigerian economy forecast to grow at 7.0% in 2011, and given rising
We are cautiously optimistic about income levels and higher risk awareness among the populace, we are
the demand for insurance cautiously optimistic about the demand for insurance products. However,
products in 2011
intense competition with rate – undercutting, moderate returns from
investments, and adjustments to the new regulatory guidelines is likely to
continue to taper short-term profitability.
A major factor which has limited the Nigerian Insurance Market from reaching
We expect the better enforcement
full potential has been the lax enforcement of insurance policies and laws in
of the six mandatory insurance
Nigeria. In Nigeria, between 1987 and 2004, 16 insurance products were
policies in 2011 to provide a boost
to industry gross premiums directly or indirectly made compulsory, of which six are very prominent and
capable of generating about 58% of the insurance premium income. However
these products have remained largely undeveloped and unenforced.
In this regard the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) launched the “The
Nigeria Insurance Market Development and Restructuring Initiatives (MDRI)" in
a bid to ensure the enforcement of the compulsory insurance products starting
September 2009. Recently, the regulator embarked on an aggressive
awareness campaign to educate and enlighten the populace on the benefits of
purchasing insurance products.
This was part of the steps undertaken to tackle low public awareness thereby
deepening insurance penetration (0.73% of 2009 GDP). Though it is still
difficult to measure the effect of the public awareness in monetary terms, we
are optimistic that it will gradually begin to impact patronage of insurance
products.
We see oil and gas insurance as an engine of growth in the near to medium
term, given the increased focus in that segment by insurance companies and
the gap needed to meet the government’s target of 70% local content. A key
step taken to actualize this target is the enactment of the Nigerian Oil and Gas
“Local capacity” to underwrite Content Development Act 2010 (“The Act”). The Act aims at increasing, and in
risks is defined as the aggregate
certain cases gives exclusivity to Indigenous participation and use of local
capacity of all Nigeria registered
insurers and reinsurers resources in the Oil & Gas Industry and this has opened opportunities for
support industries like insurance. Issues around the capacity of insurance
companies to underwrite such huge risks have been cleared with local capacity
defined as “the aggregate capacity of all Nigeria registered insurers and
reinsurers”. Local capacity shall be fully exhausted prior to any application for
approval to reinsure any Nigeria Oil & Gas risk overseas. We believe YoY growth
in this segment will begin to ramp this year thereby impacting the performance
of insurance companies.
The Nigerian insurance industry has historically been dominated by the broker
channel, through which a bulk of total premium income is sourced, especially in
the corporate space thus making insurance brokers indispensible. However, in
We anticipate a gradual opening recent times other channels such as bancassurance, direct marketing and direct
up of the retail market for sales channels, are gaining importance as a channel to reach out to other
insurance in 2011 growth areas such as the retail space. This effort has already started paying off
for some companies and we believe it is one which could spur heavy growth in
the industry. We believe the time is ripe to explore micro-insurance as it has
the potential of reaching a large segment of Nigeria’s underserved market. This
requires a cautious and well thought after business model, as micro-insurance
has a higher risk exposure compared to conventional insurance and it is more
susceptible to volatile cash flows from the low-income market. Micro insurance
could be offered in different areas, including health risks like illness, injury,
death, property damages and agricultural risks.
The Catalysts
BASIC INFORMATION
Custodian and Allied Insurance Plc (CAI)
Address 14B, Keffi Street
1
Forecast
Summary FY'09A FY'10F FY'11F FY'12F FY'13F
0.9
EPS (N) 0.37 0.44 0.45 0.56 0.65
0.8
Assets
Cash at bank and in hand 132 240 595 714 857 1,028
Short-term deposits 1,671 7,363 8,173 9,808 11,769 14,123
Due from Insurance Companies, Agents and
Debtors 870 1,186 1,491 1,670 1,870 2,094
Other Assets 2,565 2,587 3,351 3,750 4,453 5,320
Fixed Assets 427 566 550 605 665 732
TOTAL ASSETS 5,665 11,942 14,160 16,546 19,614 23,297
Liabilities
Current Liabilities 349 566 451 677 1,015 1,523
Insurance Funds 687 1,177 2,240 3,248 4,060 5,075
Deferred Taxation 64 82 91 109 136 170
Other Liabilities 0 1,170 234 234 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES 1,100 2,995 3,016 4,268 5,211 6,768
Net Assets 4,565 8,947 11,144 12,278 14,402 16,529
Assets
Cash at bank and in hand 0.88 1.60 3.97 4.76 5.71 6.85
Short-term deposits 11.14 49.09 54.49 65.39 78.46 94.15
Due from Insurance Companies, Agents and
Debtors 5.80 7.91 9.94 11.13 12.47 13.96
Other Assets 17.10 17.25 22.34 25.00 29.69 35.47
Fixed Assets 2.85 3.77 3.67 4.03 4.43 4.88
TOTAL ASSETS 37.77 79.61 94.40 110.31 130.76 155.31
Liabilities 0.00
Current Liabilities 2.33 3.77 3.01 4.51 6.77 10.15
Insurance Funds 4.58 7.85 14.93 21.65 27.07 33.83
Deferred Taxation 0.43 0.55 0.61 0.73 0.91 1.13
Other Liabilities 0.00 7.80 1.56 1.56 0.00 0.00
TOTAL LIABILITIES 7.33 19.97 20.11 28.45 34.74 45.12
Net Assets 30.43 59.65 74.29 81.85 96.01 110.19
Assets
Cash at bank and in hand 188.3 350.3 459.4 292.9 384.1 503.9
Short-term deposits 5,338.5 10,465.4 8,657.0 10,861.2 13,544.9 16,891.9
Due from Insurance Companies, Agents
and Debtors 988.0 2,618.4 2,010.2 2,650.0 3,492.7 4,603.4
Other Assets 797.0 2,261.0 5,134.0 3,750.0 4,687.5 5,859.4
Fixed Assets 664.3 794.9 910.0 605.0 724.0 866.4
TOTAL ASSETS 7,976.1 16,490.0 17,170.7 18,159.0 22,833.3 28,724.9
Liabilities
Current Liabilities 424.7 2,195.6 673.5 677.0 846.9 1,059.5
Insurance Funds 555.3 932.4 1,595.0 2,437.0 3,723.5 4,758.3
Deferred Taxation 50.2 30.0 191.6 112.6 90.0 111.7
Other Liabilities 647.0 1,023.0 2,086.0 2,806.0 3,774.1 4,698.7
TOTAL LIABILITIES 1,677.1 4,181.0 4,546.1 6,032.6 8,434.5 10,628.1
Net Assets 6,298.7 12,309.6 12,625.0 12,901.0 13,534.0 14,621.0
Assets
Cash at bank and in hand 1.3 2.3 3.1 2.0 2.6 3.4
Short-term deposits 35.6 69.8 57.7 72.4 90.3 112.6
Due from Insurance Companies, Agents and Debtors 6.6 17.5 13.4 17.7 23.3 30.7
Other Assets 5.3 15.1 34.2 25.0 31.3 39.1
Fixed Assets 4.4 5.3 6.1 4.0 4.8 5.8
TOTAL ASSETS 53.2 109.9 114.5 121.1 152.2 191.5
Liabilities
Current Liabilities 2.8 14.6 4.5 4.5 5.7 7.1
Insurance Funds 3.7 6.2 10.6 16.3 24.8 31.7
Deferred Taxation 0.3 0.2 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.8
Other Liabilities 4.3 6.8 13.9 18.7 25.2 31.3
TOTAL LIABILITIES 11.2 27.9 30.3 40.2 56.2 70.9
Net Assets 42.0 82.1 84.2 86.0 90.2 97.5
INVESTMENT RATINGS
Vetiva uses a 5-tier ratings system for stocks under coverage: Buy,
Accumulate, Neutral, Reduce and Sell.
Definition of Ratings
Buy rating refers to stocks that are highly undervalued but with strong
fundamentals and where potential return in excess of or equal to 25.00% is
expected to be realized between the current price and analysts’ target price.
Accumulate rating refers to stocks that are undervalued but with good
fundamentals and where potential return of between 10.00% and 24.99% is
expected to be realized between the current price and analysts’ target price.
Neutral rating refers to stocks that are correctly valued with little upside or
downside where potential return of between +5.00 and+9.99% is expected to
be realized between current price and analysts’ target price.
Reduce rating refers to stocks that are overvalued but with good or weakening
fundamentals and where potential return of between -5% and -+4.99% is
expected to be realized between current price and analysts’ target price.
Sell rating refers to stocks that are highly overvalued but with weak
fundamentals and where potential return in excess less than -5% is expected
to be realized between current price and analysts’ target price.
Tel: +234-1-4617521-3
Fax: +234-1-4617524
Email: research@vetiva.com
info@vetiva.com
VETIVA
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
2011 Outlook
DISCLOSURES SECTION
Analyst Certification
Other Disclosures
Vetiva Capital Management Limited or any of its affiliates (collectively “Vetiva”) may have
financial or beneficial interest in securities or related investments discussed in this report,
potentially giving rise to a conflict of interest which could affect the objectivity of this
report. Material interests which Vetiva may have in companies or securities discussed in this
report are herein disclosed:
Vetiva may own shares of the company/subject covered in this research report.
Vetiva does or may seek to do business with the company/subject of this research
report
Vetiva may be or may seek to be a market maker for the company which is the subject
of this research report
Vetiva or any of its officers may be or may seek to be a director in the company which
is the subject of this research report
Vetiva may be likely recipient of financial or other material benefits from the
company/subject of this research report.
Disclaimer
This research report is based on public information which the research analyst(s) consider
credible and reliable. Facts and views presented in this material have not been reviewed by,
and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other business areas of Vetiva,
including the investment banking team, as Vetiva has established information barriers
between its Research team and certain business groups. Whilst reasonable care has been
taken in preparing this document, no responsibility or liability is accepted either by Vetiva,
its officers or any of its employees for any error of fact or opinion expressed herein. No
reliance should be placed on the accuracy, fairness or completeness of the information
contained in this report as it has not been verified by the research analyst(s) involved or
the companies whose securities have been referred to except as otherwise disclosed.
Neither Vetiva nor any of its officers or employees including the research analyst (s)
warrant or represent the accuracy or completeness of information set out in this report. Any
ratings, forecasts, estimates and opinions set forth in this report constitute the analyst(s)
position as at the date of this report and may not necessarily be so after the report date as
they are subject to change without notice. It is also instructive to note that a company’s
past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future performance as estimates are
based on assumptions that may or may not be realized.
The value, price or income from investments mentioned in this report may fall as well as
rise due to economic conditions, industry cycles, market indices, operational or financial
conditions of companies or other factors. Thus, Vetiva and its officers and employees shall
not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of this report or its contents in making
investment decisions or recommendations. This report provides general information only. It
is not intended to provide personal investment advice and does not take into account the
specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific
person. Investments discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors and the
reader(s) should independently determine their suitability and evaluate the investment risks
associated with such investments. All investors are solely responsible for their investment
decisions. Any decision to purchase or subscribe for securities in any offering must be based
solely on existing public information on such security or the information in the prospectus
or other offering document issued in connection with such offering, and not on this report.
Vetiva, through business units other than Vetiva Research, may have issued and may in the
future issue trading ideas or recommendations that are inconsistent with, and reach
different conclusions from, the information presented in this report.
Such ideas or recommendations reflect the different time frames, assumptions, views and
analytical methods of the persons who prepared them, and Vetiva is under no obligation to
ensure that such other trading ideas or recommendations are brought to the attention of
any recipient of this report. To the extent this report discusses any legal proceeding or
issue, it has not been prepared as nor is it intended to express any legal conclusion, opinion
or advice. Information relating to the tax status of companies whose securities are
discussed in this report is not intended to provide tax advice or to be used by anyone to
provide tax advice. By accepting this research report, you agree to be bound by the
foregoing limitations. Vetiva Capital Management Limited is registered with the Securities &
Exchange Commission to conduct Financial Advisory, Fund/Portfolio Management, and
Trusteeship business in Nigeria. This document is for information purposes only and for
private circulation. No portion of this document may be reprinted, sold or redistributed
without the written consent of Vetiva Capital Management Limited. Vetiva research report is
disseminated and available primarily electronically, and, in some cases, in printed form.