40 views

Uploaded by Vu Nguyen

- g7m3l9- solving multistep word problems equations
- Excel Auto Grading
- practice k 3-4
- whats in the bank aims activity
- Spreadsheet.doc
- video lesson plan
- Force Method
- Sec7.1 Excel Instructions
- الغاو لمعادلة من الدرجة الاولى.pdf
- lesson plan thales 8 s4
- Mathcad - CAPE - 2008 - Math Unit 2 - Paper 03-2
- practice k 3-5
- Using Kyplot
- 2.2 Multistep Equations
- Module Objectives
- METHODIST KL 2013 M1(Q&A)
- diploma_syllabus_1st_year-2nd_sem.pdf
- Computational Spreadsheets
- Differential Equations
- Front Page

You are on page 1of 4

Factors

In theory at least, the design of a column or of a beam-column starts with the evaluation of the

elastic restraints at both ends of the column, from which the effective length factor k is then

derived. To get a k-factor, the designer is much more likely to use the two charts provided in the

Column Design section

of the AISC Manuals 1,2 rather than to solve the transcendental equations on which the charts

are based.

However, having to read k-factors from an alignment chart in the middle of an electronic

computation, in a spreadsheet for instance, prevents full automation and can be a source of

errors. The fact that spreadsheets cannot accept so-called circular references makes their use

awkward for the automatic

solution of transcendental equations. A side benefit of an excellent article by Barakat and Chen

was the demonstration of how powerful an engineering tool the electronic spreadsheet can be: it

automates many routine calculations, and it is well suited for tedious column and beam-column

calculations.

Barakat and Chen did not elaborate on how they obtained the k-factors used in their examples;

from the context, it seems that the factors were manually entered into the spreadsheet.

Obviously, it would be convenient to have simple

equations take the place of the charts in the AISC Manuals. The American Concrete Institute

does publish equations, but their lack of accuracy may be why they seem not to be used in steel

design. Better equations have been available in the

French Design Rules for Steel Structures since 1966, and have been included in the European

Recommendations of 1978, with only a change in notation. These equations are accurate, yet

simple enough to be easily programmed within the confines of a spreadsheet cell. For this

reason, they may be useful to North American engineers.

1. EXACT AND APPROXIMATE EQUATIONS

Consider a column AB elastically restrained at both ends. The rotational restraint at one end, A

for instance, is represented by a restraint factor G4, expressing the relative stiffness of all the

columns connected at A to that of all the beams framing into A:

Braced frames are frames in which the sidesway is effectively prevented, and, therefore, the ^-

factor is never greater than 1.0. The "sidesway inhibited" alignment chart is the graphic solution

of the following mathematical equation:

This equation is mathematically exact, in that certain physical assumptions are exactly

translated in mathematical terms. Whether these assumptions can be reasonably extended to a

specific structure is a matter for the designer to

decide.

For the transcendental Eq. 2, which can only be solved by numerical methods, the French Rules

propose the following approximate solution:

Slightly simpler equations apply to special cases. If the column is hinged at B,GB is infinitely

large, and 1 / GB = 0

If a rigid frame depends solely on frame action to resist lateral forces, its sidesway is not

prevented. In this case, the K-factor is never smaller than 1.0. The mathematical equation for the

"sway uninhibited" case is:

Although simpler than Eq. 2, this equation cannot be solved in closed form either. The French

Rules recommend the following approximate solution:

When GA = GB= G:

The accuracy that we can readily measure is of course the mathematical accuracy, that is, the

comparison of the results given by an approximate formula to those obtained by solving the

corresponding "exact" equation. The accuracy of the alignment charts depends essentially on the

size of the charts,

and on the reader's sharpness of vision. For the small charts in the Column Section of the AISC

Manuals, this accuracy may be about five percent. In view of the many simplifying assumptions

needed to arrive at Eqs. 2 and 7, this accuracy is certainly sufficient.

The formula proposed by the ACI for braced frames gives K = 0.7 for a beam fully fixed at

both ends, instead of 0.5. If GA = GB = 3.0, it yields K=l.O, instead of the expected 0.89.

The equations for unbraced frames are somewhat better: for GA = GB = 2.0 for instance, they

yield K = 1.56, instead of 1.61. The French Rules indicate that Eq. 3 has an accuracy of -0.5

percent to +1.5 percent, while Eq. 8 is accurate within two percent. Tables 1 and 2 report the

accuracies found at a few sample points. Again because of the nature of the surrounding

assumptions, Eqs. 3 and 8 may be considered mathematically exact.

- g7m3l9- solving multistep word problems equationsUploaded byapi-276774049
- Excel Auto GradingUploaded byapi-26240528
- practice k 3-4Uploaded byapi-296726470
- whats in the bank aims activityUploaded byapi-302577842
- Spreadsheet.docUploaded byRuba Tarshne :)
- video lesson planUploaded byapi-301276389
- Force MethodUploaded bypraveennagarajan
- Sec7.1 Excel InstructionsUploaded byReyden Cabargada
- الغاو لمعادلة من الدرجة الاولى.pdfUploaded byHudaSEl-zerii
- lesson plan thales 8 s4Uploaded byapi-169562716
- Mathcad - CAPE - 2008 - Math Unit 2 - Paper 03-2Uploaded byNefta Baptiste
- practice k 3-5Uploaded byapi-296726470
- Using KyplotUploaded byAli Abdelrahem
- 2.2 Multistep EquationsUploaded byMrPeterson25
- Module ObjectivesUploaded byRhiza Navallasca
- METHODIST KL 2013 M1(Q&A)Uploaded bySTPMmaths
- diploma_syllabus_1st_year-2nd_sem.pdfUploaded bySonalini Behera
- Computational SpreadsheetsUploaded byaliseory100
- Differential EquationsUploaded byRavindra
- Front PageUploaded byAHMED BAKR
- Mechanical_Intro_16.0_L06_RemoteBC.pdfUploaded byAurelio Vera
- Advance Chart Properties of Drill Down TabUploaded byJaypaul Ocampo Acidera
- Weldgrp --- Weld Group Analysis ProgramUploaded byMario Sajulga Dela Cuadra
- inf 1060Uploaded byapi-321967710
- Subject Report June 2004-2Uploaded bywill bell
- HS Algebra 2009Uploaded byiitforum
- python multiple sessionsUploaded by芥川 龍
- probpcoffeeshopbusinessplan-100221104752-phpapp01Uploaded byAzhar Mirza
- An-Analysis-of-Errors-Made-by-Grade-7-Students-in-Solving-Simple-Linear-Equations-in-One-Variable(1).pdfUploaded byLito Larino
- mathregressionprojectUploaded byapi-270106607

- IDT Instalacion Manual3016_USMetricUploaded byCarlos Garcia
- Mooring OperationsUploaded bymendez529
- Sika 26-9-2011Uploaded byVu Nguyen
- 10 - Weld DesignUploaded byVu Nguyen
- TCVN cocbetongLYTAMUploaded byhiepkdo
- 14TCN197-2006Uploaded byVu Nguyen
- Kiem Dinh Bua Dong CocUploaded byVu Nguyen
- 01. Tính Nứt BtctUploaded byVu Nguyen
- RE-500-SD_FTM_2012-09Uploaded byVu Nguyen
- Delmag Dieselbaeren USUploaded byVu Nguyen
- 6B3_22TCN267-2000_dau_Uploaded byNguyen Thuan Duc
- Bluescope_HDGUploaded byVu Nguyen
- 10. U-00034-St-dal-0115 Mcc Switch Gear House 0Uploaded byVu Nguyen
- (10-07)Comparative Study Jae-Kwan KIM KoreaUploaded byVu Nguyen
- Bai Giang Kiem Dinh CAUUploaded byVu Nguyen
- Htc Desire Uscellular Ug2Uploaded byJennifer Mccoy
- Design of a Reinforced Concrete Deck-Girder Bridge to AASHTO & ACI CodesUploaded byJuan Pablo Lopez Carrasco
- Fillet weld designUploaded bysaj0205037
- Chuong IIIUploaded byTai Pham
- TCVN cocbetongLYTAMUploaded byhiepkdo
- PHAN_1Uploaded byVu Nguyen
- Tv047-Metering Model (1)Uploaded byVu Nguyen
- AustSmallBridgesConf2005Uploaded byredrik irawan
- Verification and Implementation of Strut-And-Tie Model InUploaded byrpatel5509
- badoux99Uploaded byGirinath
- Pgsuper Design GuideUploaded byLuis Ordoñez
- CONCRETE DECKSUploaded byVu Nguyen
- SFD_BMDUploaded byraj_anu13
- SFD_BMDUploaded byraj_anu13
- Bo Tri Chung- Rach Ho NeoUploaded byVu Nguyen

- Meteor ShowersUploaded byJenniferNovabosBercero
- VoltammetryUploaded byMahander Pratap Singh
- Lecture 3 Neuropsychoanalysis.pptxUploaded byjobin
- Non Linear Dynamics - Cable_tutorial_rev1Uploaded byCostynha
- ShadeTree V6.1 Interface Configuration User Guide.pdfUploaded byapelei9563
- AssignmentUploaded byRasool Seelab
- Bea - Understanding Macondo Well Failures-BB_DHSG-Jan 2011Uploaded byDr K Gallowglaich
- Recent Publications on Leaky-Wave AntennasUploaded bysambala4444
- Filsinger PD ACCTALKUploaded byJoaquin
- 1. Fodor Jerry Representations Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science Harvester Studies in Cognitive Science 1981Uploaded byXimena Cano
- PIP CVC01018 (Project Data Sheet)Uploaded bybowitchhazel
- DS18B20.pdfUploaded bybryandrei
- Micro FeederUploaded byJose Angel Gomez
- Marketing in Small FirmsUploaded byLagnajit Ayaskant Sahoo
- Golden Software Releases Surfer with 3D Viewer, Point Cloud Layer for LiDAR Data Processing, and Base Map SymbologyUploaded byPR.com
- CMS UserGuideUploaded byRodrigo Senador
- Creative Approaches to Writing MaterialsUploaded bySelma Caballero Hernandez
- Ternary simulationUploaded byChelo Zubieta
- ImageProcessing TutorialUploaded byoicfbd
- Business_Communication_and_Etiquettes__-_Session_5_PPT_kYgr8rPvZH.pptUploaded byAshutosh Srivastava
- Man on the Moon Short Version Def for ExpositionUploaded byEli E. Torres
- Effects of Team Teaching on Students' Academic Achievement In English Language ComprehensionUploaded byIOSRjournal
- Lytle&Poff2004Uploaded byDamary Fonseca Ayala
- LMTD CalculationUploaded bymusaveer
- Clearing_the_PathwayUploaded bymonikajp
- pidatoUploaded byLericka M Permadi
- author jim grayUploaded byapi-233448344
- Open PopulationUploaded bybrianlatorre
- Chem 442- Chapter OneUploaded byHarsh Vardhan
- quality controlUploaded bytushargkambli