Connecticut - Judicial Branch Law Libraries, Foreclosure Opinions

Foreclosure Opinions - Law Libraries' NewsLog Page 1 of 10
Law Libraries' NewsLog
Law Libraries' NewsLog > Categories
3/2/2011 See Also
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 3/2/11

NewsLog
Home
Below is today's foreclosure Appellate Court opinion: About Us

Archive by
Month
z AC31890 - Cadle Co. v. Clark ("On appeal, Maureen Clark claims that the court abused Archive by
its discretion in denying her motion to open because (1) the plaintiff allegedly did not Post
properly serve several of the parties cited in as defendants and (2) her property was Archive
incorrectly valued because of alleged misrepresentations made by the plaintiff.") 11/05-
11/07
Law by
Posted at 11:42 AM by Mazur, Catherine | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions | Permalink | Subject
Email this Post | Comments (0) Law
Libraries
Home
2/25/2011
Subscribe
to our RSS
Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion - 2/25/11 Feed
Disclaimer
SC18597, SC18598 - Connecticut National Bank v. Rehab Associates ("These appeals arise
from a foreclosure action and subsequent deficiency judgment against the defendants...
relating to a mortgage loan to Rehab that had been guaranteed by Hallahan and Ermler. The
defendants now appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying Hallahan’s motion to
determine that the deficiency judgment was fully or, alternatively, partially satisfied as a
result of a settlement agreement (agreement) between Ermler and Shawmut Bank
Connecticut, N.A. (Shawmut), the successor in interest of the original plaintiff, Connecticut
National Bank. On appeal, the defendants assert that the trial court improperly concluded
that the agreement did not release Hallahan from his obligation to pay the balance of the
deficiency judgment.")
Posted at 11:35 AM by Booth, George | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions | Permalink |
Email this Post | Comments (0)
1/26/2011

Below is today's foreclosure Appellate Court opinion:
z AC30474 - Unifund CCR Partners v. Schaeppi ("The plaintiff claims on appeal that the
trial court improperly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the court improperly (1) granted the defendants'
motion for summary judgment because it lacked the requisite memorandum of law
accompanying it pursuant to Practice Book § 11-10 and (2) concluded that the
judgment lien that formed the basis of the foreclosure action was invalid because it
sought to secure a money judgment of no amount.")
Posted at 12:32 PM by Mazur, Catherine | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions | Permalink |
12/15/2010
http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011


z AC30982 - Waterview Site Services, Inc. v. Pay Day, Inc. ("This appeal arises from a
business disagreement between the plaintiff, Waterview Site Services, Inc., and the
defendant, Pay Day, Inc. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly
found that (1) the defendant consented to the work that the plaintiff performed, (2)
the mechanic's lien was filed in a timely manner and (3) the defendant was unjustly
enriched in the amount of $224,959.24. The plaintiff filed a cross appeal challenging
the court's decision that, in calculating the unjust enrichment award, it would credit
the defendant for an amount equal to the fair rental value owed by the plaintiff for
occupying the land.")
Posted at 12:55 PM by Mazur, Catherine | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions; Property Law Opinions
| Permalink | Email this Post | Comments (0)
11/22/2010
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - 11/22/10

Below are today's foreclosure Appellate Court opinions:
z AC31456 - Danzig v. PDPA, Inc. ("On appeal, the defendants claim that the court
improperly: (1) rendered summary judgment against them, as guarantors, despite the
plaintiff's having withdrawn the complaint as to them, (2) granted the plaintiff's
motions for summary judgment and for foreclosure despite the plaintiff's
noncompliance with Practice Book § 17-44, (3) did not require the plaintiff's appraiser
to testify and (4) exhibited judicial bias against Ahmed and all pro se parties in
general.")
z AC31457 - Danzig v. PDPA, Inc. ("On appeal, PDPA claims that the court improperly
refused to allow it the opportunity to plead in response to the plaintiff's amended
complaint. Additionally, the plaintiff raises questions about PDPA's standing and
whether the appeal has been taken from a final judgment.")
Posted at 11:45 AM by Mazur, Catherine | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions | Permalink |
11/17/2010

z AC30145 - Equity One, Inc. v. Shivers ("On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial
court improperly (1) failed to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine if it had
subject matter jurisdiction, (2) failed to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction and (3) rendered judgment in violation of a bankruptcy stay.")
11/3/2010

z AC31489 - LaSalle Bank, N.A. Trustee v. Randall ("The defendant claims that the court
improperly approved the sale on the motion of the committee of sale because the
foreclosing lender, the substitute plaintiff, LaSalle Bank, N.A., Trustee, submitted an
inflated appraisal that discouraged other bidders and allowed the plaintiff to purchase
the property for a bid price that was inadequate and inequitable.")
z AC31098 - Myrtle Mews Assn., Inc. v. Bordes ("The defendant claims that the court
erred in denying its motion to open because the court lacked personal jurisdiction over
it as a result of insufficiency of process and insufficient service of process, thus
rendering the judgment void.")
z AC31471 - Rockville Bank v. Victory Outreach Ministries, Inc. ("On appeal, the
defendant claims that the court improperly (1) ordered the sale in light of evidence
that the defendant had complied with an agreement (agreement) entered into with the
plaintiff, Rockville Bank, in satisfaction of the mortgage, and (2) approved the sale
despite that compliance and evidence that the committee improperly administered the
sale.")
9/20/2010
Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion - 9/20/10

SC18393 - Lestorti v. DeLeo ("On appeal to this court, the defendant claims that the
Appellate Court's decision (1) conflicts with well established Connecticut law concerning the
rights of coguarantors to contribution, and (2) is improperly based on an assumption of a
fact that is not part of the record.")
z Concurrence
Posted at 11:42 AM by Mazur, Catherine | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions; Tort Law Opinions |
Permalink | Email this Post | Comments (0)
9/13/2010

z AC30911 - LaSalle Bank, National Assn. v. Bialobrzeski ("On appeal, the defendant
claims that it was improper for the trial court to deny his motion to dismiss the action
because the plaintiff lacked standing.")
z AC29884 - Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Bialobrzeski ("In this foreclosure
action, the pro se defendant, Paul Bialobrzeski, claims that the plaintiff lacked
standing to bring the action because it was not in possession of the subject note and
mortgage at the time the action was commenced.")
9/7/2010


z AC30802 - Daddario & Sons, Inc. v. Shelansky ("The defendants claim that the trial
court improperly (1) determined that the plaintiff had standing to bring this action, (2)
determined that the plaintiff's delay in foreclosing the mortgage did not indicate an
intent to abandon the mortgage or bar its action under the doctrine of laches, (3)
failed to find that the defendants were under duress when they signed the subject note
and mortgage and that the mortgage transaction was unconscionable and (4) failed to
find that the plaintiff had unclean hands and committed fraud in its dealings with
them.")
8/11/2010

z AC30059 - Trumbull v. Palmer ("The pro se defendant Helene B. Knopick and the
would-be intervenor, Linda A. Palmer, appeal from the judgment of the trial court
setting a new sale date and denying their motion to open and vacate the judgment
rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the town of Trumbull, and the court's denial of
Palmer's motions to intervene. The issues on appeal are whether the court abused its
discretion by denying (1) Palmer's motions to intervene in her individual and fiduciary
capacities, and (2) the motion to open and vacate the judgment.")
7/28/2010

z AC30530 - David M. Somers & Associates, P.C. v. Kendall ("The appellants claim that
the court improperly (1) held Somers in his individual capacity liable for damages and
(2) failed to apply the doctrine of judicial estoppel.")
Posted at 11:35 AM by Mazur, Catherine | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions; Contract Law Opinions
7/21/2010

z AC29874 - LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Lynch ("On appeal, the defendants claim that the
court erred in awarding (1) interest on the principal amount they owed under the
promissory note and (2) attorney's fees to the plaintiff under the note. On cross
appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in calculating the amount of (1)
principal debt due under the note and (2) attorney's fees under the note.")

Posted at 11:40 AM by Mazur, Catherine | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions; Property Law Opinions
6/30/2010
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - June 2010

Below are the foreclosure Appellate Court opinions issued in June 2010:
z AC30796 - Dreambuilders Construction, Inc. v. Diamond ("On appeal, the defendant

claims that the trial court's (1) order of a strict foreclosure instead of a foreclosure by
sale was improper, (2) finding that there was a contract between her and the plaintiff
was clearly erroneous, (3) finding of the value of the services and material furnished to
support the mechanic's lien was clearly erroneous, (4) finding that she could not avail
herself of the protection of the Home Improvement Act (act); General Statutes § 20-
418 et seq.; because she invoked it in bad faith was clearly erroneous and (5) finding
that a general release she executed in favor of the plaintiff, which included a release of
her counterclaim, also was a release of her defenses was improper.")
z AC31061 - Moasser v. Becker ("On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1)
improperly interpreted the remand as an order that the fees were mandated, (2)
improperly awarded fees against a party whose interest in the subject real property
was not foreclosed, (3) improperly awarded fees pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-
350f and 52-400c and (4) erred in its calculation of the fees.")
6/1/2010
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - May 2010

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in May 2010:
z Bank of New York v. Bell ("This petition for review, brought pursuant to General
Statutes § 51-164x (c) and Practice Book § 77-1, requires us to determine whether
the trial court abused its discretion by sealing certain documents in the underlying
foreclosure action. The pro se petitioner, Johnathan Bell, alleges in his brief that, by
sealing the documents at issue, the court (1) denied him due process by failing to
follow the relevant rules of practice, and (2) abused its discretion because (a) the
respondent, The Bank of New York, as trustee of BS ALT A 2005-9, waived its right to
have the documents sealed and (b) the court's factual findings do not support its legal
conclusions.")
{ Concurrence
3/31/2010
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - March 2010

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in March 2010:
z AC30728 - Savings Bank of Danbury v. Karam ("On appeal, Beaver Street, LLC, claims
that the court improperly marshaled the assets and ordered the properties to be
foreclosed in a manner that is inequitable.")

2/26/2010
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - February 2010

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in February 2010:
z AC31301 - Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Fequiere ("The defendant claims that the court
improperly concluded that the plaintiff had standing to bring the foreclosure action.
Specifically, the defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) the
plaintiff was a valid assignee of the mortgage securing the defendant's promissory note
to BNC Mortgage, Inc., the plaintiff's predecessor in interest and (2) the Structured
Asset Investment Loan Trust (SAIL), the entity for which the plaintiff is trustee, was a
valid express trust as required by General Statutes § 52-106.")
1/11/2010

Ruggiero v. Pellicci SC18399 (Foreclosure; "...[D]efendants contend that the trial court
improperly accepted the referee’s reports because the referee had abused his discretion in
denying the defendants’ motion for permission to amend their counterclaims, because: (1)
the law of the case doctrine obligated the referee to grant the motion since the trial court
already had granted that same relief; and (2) the plaintiff would not have been prejudiced by
the granting of the motion since no additional evidence was necessary, and the motion was
made to conform the pleadings to the facts adduced during the trial."
Posted at 2:31 PM by Dowd, Jeffrey | Category: Foreclosure Opinions; Recent Decisions | Permalink |
12/31/2009
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - December 2009

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in December 2009:
z AC30427 - Gagne v. Vaccaro ("On appeal, the defendant claims that §52-249 does not
authorize appellate attorney's fees, and, even if it does, the amount of fees awarded
was unreasonable.")
10/30/2009
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - October 2009

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in October 2009:
z AC29796, AC29906 - Brownstein v. Spilke (Foreclosure; “In these consolidated

appeals, the substitute plaintiff, J. Diamond Properties, LLC (Diamond), and the
defendant Georgina Spilke appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying
Diamond’s motion for a deficiency judgment as to the defendant Kenneth C. Spilke. In

AC 29796, Diamond claims that the court improperly determined that it failed to prove
the fair market value of the subject property as of the date title vested in Diamond
following a judgment of foreclosure and that it would be inequitable to grant the
deficiency judgment.”)
Posted at 11:25 AM by Roy, Christopher | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions | Permalink |
9/2/2009
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - August 2009

Below are the foreclosure Appellate Court opinions issued in August 2009:
z AC28286 - Sovereign Bank v. Licata (Foreclosure; “The substitute plaintiff, Seven

Oaks Partners, LP (Seven Oaks), appeals from the judgment of the trial court,
rendered after a jury verdict, in favor of the defendant…on her counterclaim alleging a
violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes §
42-110a et seq., and negligent misrepresentation. Seven Oaks claims that the court
improperly failed to grant its motions to set aside the verdict and for judgment
notwithstanding the verdict with respect to the counts of the defendant’s counterclaim
alleging a violation of CUTPA and negligent misrepresentation.”)
z AC29642 - Byars v. Berg (Collateral Estoppel; “…[T]he plaintiff filed a revised

complaint in the present action, alleging, inter alia, fraudulent misrepresentation.
Essentially, the plaintiff alleged that because it was not legally constituted, the
association and its various agents, including the defendants, lacked the authority
either to enter into legally binding contracts or to take legal action on behalf of the
association. The plaintiff claimed that he suffered harm from the actions of the
defendants that resulted in the association successfully having foreclosed liens against
his property.”)
Posted at 4:24 PM by Roy, Christopher | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions | Permalink |
5/4/2009
Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - April 2009

Below are the foreclosure Appellate Court opinions issued in April 2009:
z AC29058 - Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Lax ("In this foreclosure action, the
defendants...appeal from the trial court’s partial judgment rendered against them after
the court granted the motion filed by the substitute plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company (Deutsche Bank), to strike their counterclaim.")
z AC29012 - Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. Partnership ("On appeal,
Centimark claims that the court improperly (1) found in favor of Village Manor on
Village Manor’s claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent misrepresentation,
breach of contract and a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act
(CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., and (2) assessed damages on certain
counts of Village Manor’s counterclaim.")
z AC29578 - Lestorti v. DeLeo ("The defendant...appeals from the judgment the trial
court rendered following its granting of the motion of the plaintiff...to strike the
defendant’s counterclaim for equitable contribution.")

z AC29916 - Oronoque Shores Condominium Assn. No. 1, Inc. v. Smulley ("On appeal,
the defendant claims that (1) both special assessments were incorrectly apportioned,
thereby rendering them invalid, (2) notice of the special litigation assessment was
improperly published and (3) because the special assessment liens were invalid, the
association was not a prevailing party and, therefore, not entitled to an award of
attorney’s fees.")
3/31/2009
Foreclosure Appellate Opinion - March 2009

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in March 2009:
z AC29131 - Antonino v. Johnson ("On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court
improperly (1) determined that written notice was not a prerequisite of the foreclosure
action and (2) granted the plaintiffs’ motion for the appointment of a receiver of
rents.")
3/3/2009
Foreclosure Appellate Opinion - February 2009

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in February 2009:
z AC28991 - First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLC ("This is a

foreclosure appeal about a committee sale conducted during the pendency of an
appellate stay. The defendant Homes of Westport, LLC, challenges the propriety of the
judgment of the trial court approving the committee sale of certain real property in
Westport.")
12/10/2008

PNC Bank, N.A. v. Kelepecz - SC18129 (Mortgage foreclosure; determination of priorities
between subsequent encumbrancers of mortgaged property; supplemental judgment;
whether trial court properly determined that judgment lien recorded by one encumbrancer
was valid where lien certificate failed to set forth original amount of judgment secured by
lien as required by statute (§ 52-380a [a]); plenary review of validity of judgment lien based
on application of § 52-380a (a); claim that judgment lien holder failed to give statutory (§
52-351a) notice to defendant judgment debtor; whether subsequent encumbrancer had
standing to assert claim for previous encumbrancer's failure to comply with notice
requirement; standing and aggrievement, discussed.)

12/1/2008
Foreclosure Appellate Opinion - November 2008

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in November 2008:
z AC29428 - Astoria Federal Mortgage Corp. v. Matschke (“In this foreclosure action, the
defendants, Arthur Matschke and Elaine Matschke, appeal from the judgment of the
trial court denying their motion to open a judgment of foreclosure by sale.”)
10/31/2008
Foreclosure Appellate Opinion - October 2008

Below is the foreclosure Appellate Court opinion issued in October 2008:
z AC27491 - Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Book ("In this mortgage
foreclosure action, the defendant Ethan Book, Jr., appeals from the supplemental
judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the lienor defendant...This is the
second appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the trial court in this case. In the
first appeal, this court noted the "tortuous" and "labyrinthine" "factual and procedural
history" of the case...")
8/18/2008
Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion- 8/18/08

Argent Mortgage Co., LLC v. Huertas- SC18002 (Mortgages; motion to open judgment of
strict foreclosure; whether trial court correctly concluded that foreclosed property of
defendant, who was incarcerated when service was made at that property, constituted her
'usual place of abode' within meaning of statute (§ 52-57 [a]) governing, inter alia, abode
service; whether trial court had personal jurisdiction over defendant; whether defendant's
motion to open was moot because it was filed after title to property had vested in plaintiff
mortgagee)
Posted at 11:37 AM by Yeltema, Karen | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions | Permalink |
6/4/2008

Allstate Life Ins. Co. v. BFA Ltd. Partnership - SC18017 (Contracts; interpretation of
conflicting language concerning duration of indemnity obligation in environmental indemnity
agreement and subsequent reaffirmation of agreement; whether defendants' indemnification
obligation was not extinguished by foreclosure because the reaffirmation of the indemnity
agreement was a ratification of the indemnity agreement that incorporated its durational
terms).
Posted at 11:37 AM by Dowd, Jeffrey | Category: Recent Decisions; Contract Law Opinions; Foreclosure Opinions |
6/2/2008


White Sands Beach Association, Inc. v. Bombaci - SC17904 (Tax lien foreclosure;
municipalities; whether plaintiff's failure to comply strictly with procedures dictated by
enabling act rendered annexation of defendants' property ineffective; whether claim that
property was wrongfully assessed was barred by laches).
Posted at 2:29 PM by Dowd, Jeffrey | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions | Permalink |
3/17/2008
Supreme Court Advance Release Opinions - 3/17/08

Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade - SC17848, SC17849 [docket summary - Mechanic's
Liens; Foreclosure; Recovery for Materials Furnished or Services Rendered under General
Statutes § 49-33 (a); Whether Finding of Substantial Performance is Required in Order to
Recover on Mechanic's Lien Based on Contract Price; Whether Complaint was Properly
Amended After Trial.]
Posted at 1:55 PM by Roy, Christopher | Category: Recent Decisions; Contract Law Opinions; Foreclosure Opinions |
11/5/2007

Deutche Bank National Trust Co. v. Angle - SC17657
(Foreclosure; application for protection from foreclosure and for restructuring of debt
pursuant to homeowner protection statute ( §49-31d et seq.); challenge to state agency
regulation ( §49-31j-4) as exceeding statutory authority conferred on banking
commissioner; inadequate record for review; purpose of motion for articulation, discussed.).
Posted at 11:35 AM by Roy, Christopher | Category: Recent Decisions; Foreclosure Opinions; Property Law Opinions

Connecticut - Judicial Branch Law Libraries, Foreclosure Opinions

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Connecticut - Judicial Branch Law Libraries, Foreclosure Opinions

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Foreclosure Opinions - Law Libraries' NewsLog Page 1 of 10

Law Libraries' NewsLog

Law Libraries' NewsLog > Categories

3/2/2011 See Also

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 3/2/11

Below is today's foreclosure Appellate Court opinion: About Us

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 1/26/11

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 12/15/10

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - 11/22/10

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 11/17/10

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - 11/3/10

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Below are today's foreclosure Appellate Court opinions:

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion - 9/20/10

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - 9/13/10

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 9/7/10

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 8/11/10

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 7/28/10

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - 7/21/10

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - June 2010

z AC30796 - Dreambuilders Construction, Inc. v. Diamond ("On appeal, the defendant

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - May 2010

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - March 2010

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - February 2010

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion - 1/11/10

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - December 2009

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinion - October 2009

z AC29796, AC29906 - Brownstein v. Spilke (Foreclosure; “In these consolidated

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - August 2009

z AC28286 - Sovereign Bank v. Licata (Foreclosure; “The substitute plaintiff, Seven

z AC29642 - Byars v. Berg (Collateral Estoppel; “…[T]he plaintiff filed a revised

Foreclosure Appellate Court Opinions - April 2009

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Foreclosure Appellate Opinion - March 2009

Foreclosure Appellate Opinion - February 2009

z AC28991 - First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLC ("This is a

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion - 12/10/08

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Foreclosure Appellate Opinion - November 2008

Foreclosure Appellate Opinion - October 2008

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion- 8/18/08

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion - 6/04/08

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion - 6/02/08

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinions - 3/17/08

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinion - 11/05/07

http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Categories/Category.aspx?Name=Foreclosure Opini... 3/12/2011

You might also like