3/9/2011 The Hindu : Opinion / Lead : Hard ques…

Opinion » Lead

Published: February 21, 2011 01:50 IST | Updated: February 21, 2011 02:56 IST ​
Hard questions about soft questions
P. Sainath

PTI Even a doting corporate media find that the Professor did not come out looking good from his interaction with a few favoured students. That
is, electronic media chiefs and editors who have mostly adored Dr. Manmohan Singh for nearly two decades. File photo
There was in fact a successful auction of spectrum — only it was not conducted by the government but by its corporate sector
cronies who made a fortune on the deal.
On one pronouncement of his, you have to agree with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. His is not a ‘lame-duck
government.' Cooked goose seems the more appropriate soubriquet. However, not a single new scam worth over Rs. 1
lakh crore has surfaced for 10 days now. So maybe things are getting better. Yet, even a doting corporate media find
that the Professor did not come out looking good from his interaction with a few favoured students. That is, electronic
media chiefs and editors who have mostly adored Dr. Singh for nearly two decades. If even the largely free ride they
gave him left him unnerved and defensive, it's a measure of how much things have changed. Not that the editors
emerged looking better. If asking the right questions is at the heart of journalism, then somebody had a bypass. At no
point did it occur to them that the corruption they questioned him on with some passion, flowed entirely out of
policies and from a policy altar at which they have worshipped for years.
Some of the questions in fact indicated a need by worried editors to be reassured that those very policies would
continue. For instance, a fear that there is “no big reformist wave coming from UPA II. Have we lost the will to take
hard reformist decisions?” “No way,” responded the Prime Minister. “We have not lost the will. We will persist.” In
asserting that what he (and the editors) view as “reforms” are on track, Dr. Singh speaks the truth. The chaos and
corruption troubling the editors was the outcome of those very ‘reforms', if they cared to see it.
Even on corruption, the questions ranged from those revolving around some Ministers' actions to a couple implying
wrongdoing by people within the PMO or Cabinet. Nothing that suggested the country's basic direction under the
Professor's guidance is destructive and dangerous. But once you've accepted the neo-liberal economic framework
scripted since 1991 as wonderful and beyond reproach, then your questions get limited to asking who fluffed his lines.
And as for corporate criminality, editors step on to that terrain only when left without a choice and at their own risk.
The first question, fair enough, was about the 2G scam and the lack of an auction in the sale of spectrum. There's
something missing here, though. There was in fact an auction of spectrum — a successful one. Only it was not
conducted by the government but by its corporate sector cronies who gave it away for a pittance. Having been gifted
that scarce public-owned resource by the government, the cronies then auctioned it privately for astronomical sums of

thehindu.com/…/article1474880.ece?css… 1/3
3/9/2011 The Hindu : Opinion / Lead : Hard ques…
money. The argument that consumers today enjoy low prices because the privateers got it cheap is a fraud. Customers
are getting those cheap prices even after this double sale. After the crony cabal milked huge profits in its own private
auction. Had that process been cut out, consumer benefits would have been far greater. Also auctioned alongside were
the government's individual Ministers, posts and integrity. Two auctions for the price of none.
Abstract query
The press conference saw one abstract query and a no less abstract reply on ‘black money.' Not a single question on
Indian illegal funds parked overseas in Swiss and other banks. None on why the government does not reveal the names
it has in this connection. The illegal flow of such funds, according to the startling report from Global Financial
Integrity, costs the nation Rs.240 crore every single day, on average. As much as Rs. 4.3 lakh crore (twice the highest
estimate of the 2G scam losses) has been lost in just five years, between 2004 and 2008. And who are the main
culprits? “High net-worth individuals and private companies were found to be the primary drivers of illicit flows out
of India's private sector.” Seems a good subject to ask the Prime Minister some questions about. But it didn't happen.
Nor was there a single question about the Amnesty/Immunity schemes his government seems to be planning for such
criminals. This, even as it plans tougher and tougher laws for ordinary citizens, abridgement of rights for displaced
persons, gutting of the public distribution system and arrests of those protesting the incredible price rise.
Nor, while on morality and corruption, was there a single question from the editors about the Prime Minister making
Vilasrao Deshmukh Union Minister of Rural Development. A man castigated by the Supreme Court for protecting
moneylenders in Maharashtra now controls rural development across the country. The Maharashtra government has
even paid up the Rs.10-lakh fine imposed by the court in that case, signalling acceptance that wrong had been done
while he was Chief Minister. Dr. Singh cannot plead ‘coalition compulsions' here. Mr. Deshmukh is from his own
party. If he remains in the Union Cabinet after the Supreme Court trashes him, it is only because Dr. Singh wants him
there. There were no ‘coalition compulsions' in brewing the CWG scam either, but that too wasn't touched upon in the
questions.
It would, of course, be insane to expect the editors to raise a question on the nearly quarter of a million farmers who
have committed suicide in this country since 1995, going by the data of the National Crime Records Bureau. Or on
migrations out of villages going berserk. Or on worsening levels of unemployment. But there was not a single one on
hunger either.
The only serious question on food inflation, linking that to its impact on the poor in a country with 8.5 per cent
growth came from a foreigner. Now our editors present knew this to be a burning issue, even for their middle class
audiences. Yet Sara Sidner of CNN was the only one to raise it. The other question on inflation related to the need for
“the second [round of] structural reforms to be done in agriculture.” Another query on price rise — not linked to
hunger or poor people — was not answered at all. The Prime Minister was not challenged when he virtually equated
losses in the 2G scam with subsidies to the poor. “If auctions are not taking place then what is the basis for you to
calculate a loss? ... It is very much a function of what is your starting point. And also depends upon your opinion. We
have a budget which gives subsidy for food, Rs.80,000 crores per annum, some people may say these foodgrains
should be sold at marketplace. Will we say then because they are not sold at market prices, because you are giving
them a subsidy, it is a loss of Rs. Rs.80,000 crores?”
Plunder and subsidy
Firstly, he equates plunder with the pathetic subsidies tossed at the world's largest hungry population. We rank 67th
out of 84 nations in the Global Hunger Index. Secondly, subsidies for the super-rich soar each year. While food
subsidies for hundreds of millions were cut by Rs. 450 crore in the last budget.
All those carping critics attacking direct cash transfers miss the point that the government has become really good at
this. It routinely transfers billions of rupees, directly or indirectly, at each opportunity to the corporate world. And it
is equally good at corporate karza maafi — Rs.5,000 billion under just three heads (direct corporate income tax,
customs and excise duties) in the last budget. That's two-and-a-half times the 2G scam estimate. It also gets bigger
with each new budget. The dominant media have never once raised a peep of protest against the corporate plunder of
public money, thanks to the government Dr. Singh presides over. Nor did they in this conference with the Prime
Minister. So Dr. Singh is understandably peeved when asked about the petty cash transfers of the 2G scam to a
handful of hucksters. The Prime Minister wanted to know if the editors would view the Rs.80,000 crore his
government commits to food subsidies as ‘losses.' Actually, most of them do. Quite a few of them would like to see all
subsidies directed at the poor to be wound up. The politically correct way of going about this is to call for the
“streamlining of systems,” or “proper targeting,” or “efficiency.” A demand never once made of the tsunami of
subsidies given to a handful of super-rich (media owners amongst them).

thehindu.com/…/article1474880.ece?css… 2/3
3/9/2011 The Hindu : Opinion / Lead : Hard ques…
One positive point: Dr. Singh announced no new Group of Ministers at his conference with the editors. Though one's
probably required to conduct a GoM Census. That might help Pranab Mukherjee figure out how many of these he
chairs. And spare him the embarrassment of having to ask “so which GoM is this?” at his next meeting. A ‘lame duck'
government? Not really. More like an integrity-challenged Cuckoo.
Keywords: 2G spectrum scam, CBI probe, Manmohan interaction, A. Raja, S-band deal

Ads by Google

Download Google Chrome

Searching is fast and easy with Google's web browser.
www.Google.com/Chrome
Printable v ersion | Mar 9 , 201 1 7 :50:06 PM | http://www.theh indu.com /opinion/lea d/article1 47 4880.ece
© The Hindu

thehindu.com/…/article1474880.ece?css… 3/3