Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
1.1 Type of Foundation on Rock
1.2 Input Parameter For Bearing Capacity Calculation
1.3 Loadings From Upper Structures Analysis For Foundation
2. Shallow Foundation
2.1 Bearing capacity
- Strength Properties Based on Rock Mass Classification System
( RMR)
- Hoek And Brown Bearing Capacity
- Empirical Formula
3 Deep Foundation
3.1 Bearing Capacity
3.1.1 Piles on intact ( unweathered ) rocks.
3.1.2 Piles on weathered rocks.
Bearing capacity ( BC) is a capacity and capability of soil or rock and foundation
either shallow or deep foundation to retain loading from upper structure.
The upper structure can be bridge, tower, building or any structure which resting
on the foundation.
In design and analysis of foundation, three steps as mentioned above should be
performed, in order to calculate bearing capacity, some aspects should be taken
into account.
Bearing capacity can be obtained from site investigation to the area of soil or
rock where any structure will be built resulting in some parameters.
1. BC from building code
BC taken from this method is very rough value, only recommended when
site investigation data not available.
2. BC from the measurement of particular parameter in in-situ test and
laboratory test.
The figure 2 shows how the load is transferred into the rock, the loading from
upper structure ( dead load and live load ) is collected in the column of the
building, at the same time the column is attached to the top part of the foundation
then the loading is given by the foundation to the soil / rock resulting in a system
of equilibrium.
High rise building
Soil / rock
Foundation
2. SHALOW FOUNDATION
The allowable bearing pressure for three classes of rock ( soft rock, medium rock
and hard rock ) can be used using building code as shown in the fig.3
fig.3 BC from building code
The effect of fractured intensity on bearing capacity of the above rock types can
be estimated from RQD of drill core as follow :
Fractured rock will of course have a much lower compressive strength than intact
rock.
A strength criterion
Has been developed by Hoek and Brown :
Where :
Cf 1 s 1 / 2σ u ( r ) [1 + (ms −1 / 2 + 1)1 / 2 ]
qa =
SF
Where : Cf1 = correction factor for foundation shape shown in the table 2.
SF = safety factor 2 – 3
m and s = material factor of discontinuity
σu ( r ) = uniaxial compressive strength
In the case of footing which recessed into the rock surface, it is necessary to
modify equation above to account for the increase in the stress as a results of
confining stress applied at the ground surface.
The modified value of allowable bearing pressure is as follows :
3. BC from Bell
For weak rock with little fracturing , Bell provide the formula which utilizes the
bearing capacity factor Nc Nq Nγ described in the fig 6
C f 1cNc + C f2 ( Bγ / 2) N γ + γDN q
qa =
SF
Where :
Nc = 2 Nθ1/2(Nθ+1)
Nq = Nθ2
Nγ = 0.5 Nθ1/2(Nθ2 – 1 )
Nθ= tan2(45 + φ / 2 )
γB c
σ 3A = N φ 2 + ( 2 )( N φ 2 − 1)
2 tan ψ 1 tan φ2
Nθ1= tan2(45 + φ1 / 2 )
Nθ2= tan2(45 + φ2 / 2 )
fig.6 BC factors
Example 1
a. Building code
From the table 5.1 and 5.2 a bearing capacity of about 1 – 2 MPa can be
interpreted for rock which is moderately strong and has a moderate discontinuity
spacing
qa = 1.14 Mpa
c. Bell solution
Bell solution needs c and φ of rock mass. For an average pressure on the
foundation = 2 MPa , the instantaneous values for c and φ are 0.54 and 25 o
respectively. Then Nθ = 2.47
Nc = 10.92 and Nγ = 4.01.
5.9 + 0.09 + 0
Assuming strip foundation of width 2 m and SF = 3, qa = = 2 MPa.
3
To control the structure is safe under such loading, the stability analysis is
performed by comparison between the loading from upper structure with
allowable bearing capacity.
The allowable bearing capacity is ultimate bearing capacity divided by safety
factor.
qall = qult / SF
the value of SF is recommended 2 – 3 depends on standard requirement.
Column
Footing
Rock
Fig.8
H
M
DEEP FOUNDATION
3.1 BEARING CAPACITY
As shown in the figure 9 , two types of piles are generally installed on rock.
The measurement of bearing capacity can be based on RQD value and
properties of rock cores.
The table 3 can be used to obtain q a , for this contact pressure, the settlement
of foundation should not exceed 0.5 in ( 12.5 mm ).
table 3 Allowable contact pressure
q a = ( qu ) core K sp d
Where :
Qall = p Ls Cbs
p = pile perimeter ( = πB for circular pile )
Ls = socketed pile length in the rock
Cbs = allowable bond strength between concrete and rock.
a. Single Pile
V
< SF
Qult
where Qult = Capacity of single pile under vertical load
b. Piles In Group
The control of pile stability in group requires complex analysis, will be described
in the next subject.
Example :
A 36 in ( 900 mm ) diameter drilled pile is supported on unweathered rock by
socketting 6 ft into it. The rock was sandstone with qu core of 90 t/ft2. Estimate the
allowable BC of the pile.
Solution:
qa = ( qu )core Ksp d
= 90 x 0.3 x 1.2 t/ft2 = 32 t/ft2
Qv(all) = p Ls Cbs
The value for a allowable bond stress Cbs is not available for unweathered
Sandstone and the pile material ( concrete ). A conservative value of 4.5 t/ft2
Can be estimated from table.
qall = 36 t / ft2
From the case b and c , the lower value of allowable BC = 32 t/ft2 can be
obtained.