Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Justice Magdangal M. de Leon
Basic principles
Rule 1
General Provisions
(Sections 1 to 6)
Jurisdiction
1. Generally
a. subject matter
b. res or property
c. issues
d. parties
2. Estoppel to deny jurisdiction
Heirs of Bertuldo Hinog vs. Melicor, 455 SCRA
460 (2005)
3. Jurisdiction at time of filing of action
People vs. Cawaling, 293 SCRA 267 (1998)
Special Courts
Sandiganbayan
PD 1616, as am. by RA 7975 and RA 8249
Kinds of action
1. As to cause or foundation
a. personal
b. real
*distinction important in determining venue
2. As to object
a. in rem
b. in personam
c. quasi in rem
*distinction important in service of summons
Commencement of action
1. Condition precedent
Katarungang Pambarangay
Lumbuan vs. Ronqullo, G.R. No. 155713, May 5, 2006
2. Payment of filing fee
Heirs of Bertuldo Hinog vs. Melicor, 455 SCRA 460 (2005), reiterating Sun Insurance
Office, Ltd. vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274 (1989)
Rule 2
Cause of Action
(Rules 1 to 6)
Rule 3
Parties to Civil Actions
(Sections 1 to 22)
Defendants
1. Unwilling co-plaintiff (Sec. 10)
2. Alternative defendant (Sec. 13)
3. Unknown defendant (Sec. 14; Rule 14, Sec. 14)
4. Entity without juridical personality as defendant (Sec. 15; Rule 14, Sec. 8)
Rule 4
Venue of Actions
(Sections 1 to 4)
4
Venue defined
Distinguished from jurisdiction
Venue of real actions (Sec. 1)
Venue of personal actions (Sec. 2)
Venue of actions against non-residents (Sec. 3)
Quasi in rem = action affects personal status
of plaintiff -- residence of plaintiff
In rem = action affects property of defendant
in Phils. -– location of property
Pleadings
(Substantial Requirements)
In general
Defined (Rule 6, Sec. 1)
Distinguished from motion (Rule 15, Sec. 1)
What allowed (Rule 6, Sec. 2)
Parts of a pleading (Rule 7)
How allegations made
In general (Rule 8, Sec. 1)
Capacity (Rule 8, Sec. 4)
Alternative claims and defenses (Rule 8, Sec. 2)
Conditions precedent (Rule 8, Sec. 3)
Fraud and mistake, condition of mind (Rule 8, Sec.
5)
Judgments (Rule 8, Sec. 6)
Official documents (Rule 8, Sec. 9)
Need to bring in new parties (Rule 6, Sec. 12)
Complaint
Defined and in general (Rule 6, Sec. 3)
Allegations
In general (Rule 8, Sec. 1)
Mathay vs. Consolidated Bank and Trust
Company, 58 SCRA 559 (1974)
Capacity of parties (Rule 8, Sec. 4)
5
Answer
Defined and in general (Rule 6, Sec. 4)
Types of defenses
Negative (Rule 6, Sec. 5(a))
How alleged, generally (Rule 8, Sec. 10)
Capacity of parties (Rule 8, Sec. 4)
Genuiness of documents (Rule 8, Sec. 8)
Negative pregnant
PHILAMGEN vs. Sweet Lines, 212 SCRA 194
(1993)
Affirmative (Rule 6, Sec. 5(b))
Implied admissions (Rule 9, Sec. 1)
Counterclaims
Defined and in general (Rule 6, Sec. 6)
How raised
Included in answer (Rule 6, Sec. 9; Rule 11, Sec. 8)
After answer (Rule 6, Sec. 9; Rule 11, Sec. 9)
Kinds of counterclaims
Compulsory (Rule 6, Sec. 7; Rule 9, Sec. 2)
- cannot be independently adjudicated
- jurisdiction (both as to amount and nature; exception)
- filing fees and non-forum certification not
required
Permissive
Korea Exchange Bank vs. Gonzales, 456 SCRA 224
(2005)
BA Finance Corp. vs. Co, 224 SCRA 163
(1993)
Remedies
For failure to raise compulsory counterclaim (Rule 9, Sec. 2)
Oversight, inadvertence, excusable neglect (Rule 11, Sec. 10)
In case main action fails
BA Finance Corp. vs. Co, supra
Answer to counterclaim
In general (Rule 6, Sec. 4)
Period to plead (Rule 11, Sec. 4)
Reply
Defined and in general (Rule 6, Sec. 10)
When required (Rule 6, Sec.10)
Challenge due to authenticity of documents (Rule 8, Sec. 8)
(Formal Requirements)
Filing and Service of Pleadings,
Motions and Orders
Amendments
Kinds
Formal amendments (Rule 10, Sec. 4)
Substantial amendments
Matter of right (Rule 10, Sec. 2)
Matter of discretion (Rule 10, Sec. 3)
To conform to evidence (Rule 10, Sec. 5)
Swagman Hotels & Travel, Inc. vs. CA,
G.R. No. 161135, April 8, 2005
Remedies
Periods to answer
Amendments (Rule 11, Sec. 3)
Supplemental complaint (Rule 11, Sec. 7)
7
Bill of Particulars/Intervention
Rule 14
Summons
(Sections 1 to 20)
personal (Sec. 6)
substituted (Sec. 7)
Robinson vs. Miralles, G.R. No. 163584, December 12, 2006)
publication (Sec. 14)
extraterritorial (Secs. 15,16)
Valmonte vs. CA, 252 SCRA 92 (1996)
Perkin Elmer Singapore Pte Ltd. vs. Dakila Trading Corporation, G.R. No. 172242, August
14, 2007
♦ registered mail invalid service of summons
Voluntary appearance (Sec. 20)
Delos Santos vs. Montesa, 221 SCRA 15 (1993)
Orion Security Corporation vs. Kalfam Enterprises, Inc., G.R. No. 163287, April 27,
2007
Return of service (Sec. 4)
Proof of service (Sec. 18)
publication (Sec. 19)
Rule 15
Motions
(Sections 1 to 10)
In general (Sec. 1)
Form (Sec. 2)
Generally (Sec. 10)
May be oral (Sec. 2)
Motion for leave (Sec. 9)
Prohibited motion
Contents (Sec. 3)
Omnibus motion rule (Sec. 8)
Exceptions (Rule 9, Sec. 1)
Notice of hearing (Secs. 4, 5)
General rule = without compliance – scrap of paper
Exceptions
Motions which may be granted ex parte
Where adverse party had opportunity to oppose
Lanto vs. Dimaporo, 16 SCRA 599 (1966)
Vlason Enterprises Corp. vs. CA, 330 SCRA 26
(1999)
Proof of service (Sec. 6)
Hearing of motions (Sec. 7)
Rule 16
Motion to Dismiss
(Sections 1 to 6)
4. Motion to dismiss appeal either in RTC (Rule 41, Sec. 13), CA (Rule 50, Sec. 1) or
SC (Rule 56, Sec. 5)
Grounds (Sec. 1)
Lack of jurisdiction
Boticano vs. Chu, 148 SCRA 541 (1987)
Res judicata
Del Rosario vs Far East Bank and Trust Company, G.R. No. 150134, October 31,
2007
No cause of action
Halimao vs. Villanueva, 253 SCRA 1 (1996)
Tan vs. CA, 295 SCRA 247 (1998)
Statute of frauds
Asia Production Co., Inc. vs. Pano, 205 SCRA 458
(1992)
Condition precedent
Sunville Timber Products, Inc. vs. Abad, 206 SCRA 482
(1992)
Who files
How pleaded
Period (Sec. 1)
As affirmative defense (Sec. 6)
- counterclaim which may be prosecuted in same or separate action refers to
permissive counterclaim
Hearing and resolution (Secs. 2, 3)
Municipality of Binan vs. CA, 219 SCRA 69 (1993)
- preliminary hearing not mandatory
- preliminary hearing on an affirmative defense for
failure to state a cause of action is not necessary
Effects
Of dismissal (Sec. 5)
On periods for pleading (Sec. 4)
On other grounds and omnibus motion rule (Rule 9, Sec. 1; Rule 15, Sec. 8)
Remedies
If motion granted – appeal or refile complaint
If motion denied - file answer, unless without jurisdiction, in which case, Rule 65 petition
NPC vs. CA, 185 SCRA 169 (1990)
Rule 17
Dismissal of Actions
(Sections 1 to 4)
Perkin Elmer Singapore Pte Ltd. vs. Dakila Trading Corporation, G.R. No. 172242,
August 14, 2007
Remedy of plaintiff
Ko vs. PNB, 479 SCRA 298, January 28, 2006
Dismissal of counterclaims (Sec. 4)
Default
Rule 9, Sec. 3
Order of default
When some answer and others default (Sec. 3 (c))
Extent of relief to be awarded (Sec. 5)
Where not allowed (Rule 9, Sec. 3 (e))
Procedure after order of default (Sec. 3, first par.)
Remedy from order of default
Motion to set aside (Sec. 3(b))
Ramnani vs. CA, 221 SCRA 582 (1993)
Remedies from judgment by default
Before finality
Rule 18
Pre-Trial
(Sections 1 to 7)
Nature (Sec. 2)
When (Sec. 1)
11
LCK Industries Inc. vs. Planters Development Bank, G.R. No. 170606, November 23, 2007
Requirements for appearance (Sec. 4)
Procedure
Duty to set (Sec. 1)
Effect of I.A.1.2, A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC (Rule on Guidelines to be Observed by Trial Court
Judges and Clerks of Court in the Conduct of Pre-Trial and Use of Deposition-Discovery
Measures), which took effect on August 16, 2004
Notice (Sec. 3)
Pre-trial brief required (Sec. 6)
Record or order of pre-trial (Sec. 7)
Consequences
Order (Sec. 7)
Rule 20
Calendar of Cases
(Sections 1 and 2)
Calendar (Sec. 1)
Preferences (Sec. 1)
Assignment of cases (Sec. 2)
Rule 22
Computation of Time
(Sections 1 and 2)
Rule 30
Trial
(Sections 1 to 9)
Subpoena, Rule 21
Conduct
Order of trial (Sec. 5)
Agreed statement of facts (Sec. 6; Rule 18, Secs. 2(d), 7)
12
Consolidation of trial, Rule 31, Sec. 1. Compare with Rule 2, Sec. 5 & Rule 3, Sec. 6.
Severance of trial, Rule 31, Sec. 2
Lack of cause of action may be cured by evidence presented during the trial and
amendments to conform to the evidence.
Swagman Hotels & Travel, Inc. vs. CA, G.R. No. 161135, April 8, 2005
Rule 33
Demurrer to Evidence
(Section 1)
Rule 34
Judgment on the Pleadings
(Section 1)
Meneses vs. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, G.R. No. 156304, October 23, 2006
Distinguished from summary judgment
Diman vs. Alumbres, 299 SCRA 459 (1998)
Rule 35
Summary Judgments
(Sections 1 to 6)
Rule 36
Judgments, Final Orders and Entry
(Sections 1 to 8)
Amendment of judgment
Before it becomes final and executory
Eternal Gardens Memorial vs. IAC, 165 SCRA 439
(1988)
After it becomes final and executory
Nunal vs. CA, 221 SCRA 26 (1993)
Industrial Timber Corp. vs. NLRC, 233 SCRA 597
(1994)
Supplemental judgment
Esquivel vs. Alegre, 172 SCRA 315 (1989)
Judgments nunc pro tunc
Cardoza vs. Singson, 181 SCRA 45 (1990)
Law of the case
Bar by former judgment and conclusiveness of judgment
distinguished
14
Del Rosario vs Far East Bank and Trust Company, G.R. No. 150134, October 31,
2007
Periods (Sec. 1)
For filing
Effect of motion for extension of time to file
See also Rule 41, Sec. 3, par. 2; Rule 40,
Sec. 2. par. 2
Contents
In general (Sec. 2). See also Rule 15, Sec. 3
Motion for new trial (Sec. 2, par. 2)
Motion for reconsideration (Sec. 2, par. 3)
15
Action by court
Options in general (Sec. 3)
Grant of motion for new trial (Sec. 6)
Partial new trial or reconsideration (Secs. 7, 8)
Denial
Remedies (Sec. 9; Rule 41, Sec. 1 (a))
Appeal
Ordinary Appeal
Rule 40
MTC to RTC
(Sections 1 to 9)
Where to appeal (Sec. 1)
When to appeal (Sec. 2)
How to appeal (Sec. 3)
Perfection of appeal (Sec. 4)
See Rule 41, Sec. 9
Appellate court and other lawful fees (Sec. 5)
Same as Rule 41, Sec. 4
Procedure in RTC (Sec. 7)
Rule 41
RTC to CA
(Sections 1 to 13)
Subject of appeal (Sec. 1)
Non-appealable orders
A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC (dated December 4, 2007 – took effect on December 27, 2007) –
Amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65
Modes of appeal (Sec. 2)
Period of ordinary appeal (Sec. 3)
Interrupted by timely MNT or MR
No motion for extension of time to file MNT or MR
MR filed on last day of 15-day period
Manila Memorial Park vs. CA, 344 SCRA 769 (2001
New rule on appeal after denial of MR or MNT
Neypes vs. CA, 469 SCRA 633 (2005)
Appellee who has not appealed may not obtain affirmative relief from appellate court
Custodio vs. CA, 253 SCRA 483 (1996)
Exception – when there is solidarity in obligations
Citytrust Banking Corp. vs. CA, 196 SCRA 553 (1991)
Rule 42
RTC to CA
(Sections 1 to 8)
.
Appeal from RTC decision rendered in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction
Ross Rica Sales Center, Inc. vs. Ong, G.R. No. 132197, August 16,
2005
Rule 43
Quasi-Judicial Agencies to CA
17
(Sections 1 to 13)
Scope (Sec.1)
Fabian vs. Desierto, 295 SCRA 440 (1998)
Ombudsman criminal cases – Supreme Court via
Rule 65
Garcia-Rueda vs. Pascasio, 278 SCRA 269 (1997)
Cases not covered (Sec. 2)
St. Martin Funeral Home vs. NLRC, 295 SCRA
494 (1998)
Decisions of Secretary of Labor and Director of Bureau of
Labor Relations – petition for certiorari to CA under Rule 65
Decisions of DOJ Secretary in petitions for review prosecutors’ resolutions – petition for
certiorari to CA under Rule 65
Santos vs. Go, 473 SCRA 350 (2005)
Not applicable where there is error of jurisdiction
Fortich vs. Corona, 289 SCRA 624 (1998)
Where to appeal (Sec. 3)
Pure questions of law may be raised
Period of appeal (Sec. 4)
How appeal taken (Sec. 5)
Form and contents (Sec. 6)
Effect of failure to comply with requirements (Sec. 7)
- sufficient ground for dismissal
Action by court (Sec. 8)
a. Require fiing of comment or
b. Dismiss petition outright
PPQ
When petition given due course (Sec. 10)
- prima facie finding that court or agency committed
errors of fact or law warranting reversal or modification
Effect of appeal (Sec.12)
General rule: shall NOT STAY award, judgment, final order
or resolution
Exceptions:
a. when CA directs otherwise
b. when the law directs otherwise (additional exception)
Lapid vs. CA, 334 SCRA 738 (2000
Rule 45
(Sections 1 to 9)
Annulment of Judgment
Rule 47
(Sections 1 to 10)
Certiorari
Rule 65
Distinction between certiorari under Rule 45 as a mode of appeal and certiorari under
Rule 65 as a special civil action
Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank vs. CA, 334 SCRA 305 (2000)
Exceptions
May be availed of even when appeal is available or period to appeal has expired
Luis vs. CA, 184 SCRA 230 (1993)
When appeal not adequate, or equally beneficial,
speedy or adequate
Jaca vs. Davao Lumber Co., 113 SCRA 107
(1982)
Motion for reconsideration required; exceptions
Tan vs. CA, 275 SCRA 568 (1997)
Discovery
Read Rules 23 to 29
Deposition - definition and purposes
People vs. Webb, 312 SCRA 573 (1999)
When taken
Dasmarinas Garments, Inc. vs. Reyes, 225 SCRA 622 (1993)
When leave of court required
Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 204 SCRA 212 (1991)
Request for admission
Po vs. CA, 164 SCRA 668 (1988)
Importance of discovery procedures
A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC dated July 13, 2004
Guidelines to be observed by trial court judges and clerks
of court in the conduct of pre-trial and use of deposition- discovery procedures
Hyatt Industrial Manufacturing Corps. vs. Ley Construction and
Development Corp., G.R. No. 147143, March 10, 2006
Rule 39
Execution
(Secs. 1 to 48)
Bonds in execution
1. Bond filed by judgment debtor to stay execution pending
appeal – supersedeas bond (Sec. 3)
2. Bond of judgment obligor to enable sheriff to continue
holding levied property after affidavit of third party claim
filed with him (Sec. 16)
Provisional Remedies
Rule 57
Preliminary Attachment
(Secs. 1-20)
Nature of attachment
Davao Light & Power Co., Inc. vs. CA, 204 SCRA 343
(1991)
Olib vs. Pastoral, 188 SCRA 692 (1990)
Writ may issue ex parte; prior or contemporaneous sevice of summons required for
enforcement (Sec. 5)
Davao Light & Power Co., Inc. vs. CA, supra
When attachment may be enforced without service of
summons
Valmonte vs. CA, 252 SCRA 92 (1994)
Discharge of attachment
1. Upon giving counterbond (Sec. 12)
2. On other grounds (Sec. 13)
3. Judgment rendered against attaching party – dismissal
24
Rule 58
Preliminary Injunction
(Secs. 1 to 9)
Rule 59
Receivership
(Sections 1 to 9)
Receiver defined
Normandy vs. Duque, 29 SCRA 385 (1969)
Rule 60
Replevin
(Sections 1 to 10)
Replevin defined
BA Finance Corp. vs. CA, 258 SCRA 102 (1996)
Nature
26
Rule 61
Support Pendente Lite
(Sections 1 to 7)
Rule 62
Interpleader
(Sections 1 to 7)
Interpleader defined
Beltran vs. People’s Homesite and Housing Corp.,
29 SCRA 145 (1969)
Rule 63
Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies
(Sections 1 to 6)
RTC has exclusive jurisdiction – SC has no jurisdiction over petitions for declaratory relief
Rule 64
Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of
COMELEC and COA
(Sections 1 to 9)
Rule 65
Prohibition and Mandamus
Prohibition (Sec. 2)
Nature and purpose
Vergara vs. Rugue, 78 SCRA 312 (1977)
The writ of prohibition does not lie against the exercise of a quasi-legislative function
Holy Spirit Homeowners Association vs. Defensor, G.R. No. 163980, August 3, 2006
Mandamus (Sec. 3)
Will not issue to compel a discretionary act
Sharp International Marketing vs. CA, 201 SCRA
299 (1991)
Mandamus is available only to compel the doing of an act specifically enjoined by law as a
duty
Henares, Jr. vs. Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board, G.R. No. 158290,
October 23, 2006
Exception – where there is grave abuse of discretion
First Philippine Holdings vs. Sandiganbayan, 253
SCRA 30 (1996)
Rule 66
Quo Warranto
(Sections 1 to 12)
Definition
Period for filing – within one (1) year from date petitioner
ousted from his position
Galano vs. Roxas, 67 SCRA 8 (1975)
Exception
Cristobal vs. Melchor, 78 SCRA 175 (1977)
Rule 66 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure does not apply to quo warranto
cases against persons who usurp an office in a private corporation.
29
Rule 67
Expropriation
(Sections 1 to 14)
Stages of expropriation
Period to appeal from order of expropriation
Municipality of Binan vs. Garcia, 180 SCRA 576 (1989)
Writ of possession
Republic vs. Tagle, 299 SCRA 549 (1998)
Rule 68
Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage
(Sections 1 to 8)
Equity of redemption
Limpin vs. IAC, 166 SCRA 87 (1988)
Filing of court action to enforce redemption has effect of preserving redemptioner’s rights
and “freezing” expiration of one year period.
30
Rule 69
Partition
(Sections 1 to 13)
Partition defined
Villamor vs. CA, 162 SCRA 574 (1988)
Rule 70
Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer
(Sections 1 to 21)
31
When the complaint fails to aver facts constitutive of forcible entry or unlawful detainer
Valdez, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R No. 132424, May 4, 2006
Possession by tolerance
Heirs of Rafael Magpily vs. De Jesus, 474 SCRA 366 (2005)
Rule 71
Contempt
(Sections 1 to 12)
Contempt defined
Distinction between
Direct and indirect contempt
Criminal and civil contempt
Remedies
Direct contempt (Sec. 2)
Indirect contempt (Sec. 11)
Use of falsified and forged documents constitutes indirect contempt not direct
contempt
Judge Dolores Espanol vs. Atty. Benjamin Formoso, G.R. No. 150949, June 21, 2007