Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jeukendrup, A.E., Craig, N.P., & Hawley, J.A. (2000). The Bioenergetics of Worl Class Cycling.
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 3 (4): 414-433.
Professional cycle racing is one of the most demanding of all sports combining
extremes of exercise duration, intensity and frequency. Riders are required to
perform on a variety of surfaces (track, road, cross-country, mountain), terrains
(level, uphill and downhill) and race situations (criterions, sprints, time trials, mass-
start road races) in events ranging in duration from 10 s to 3 wk stage races covenng
200 m to 4,000 km. Fm~hermore, professional road cyclists typically have ~100 race
d/yr. Because of the diversity of cycle races, there are vastly different physiological
demands associated with the various events. Until recently there was little
information on the demands of professional cycling dunng traitKng or competition.
However, with the advent of reliable, valid bicycle crank dynanometers, it is now
possible to quantify real-time power output, cadence and speed during a variety of
track and road cycling races. This article provides novel data on the physiological
demands of professional and world-class amateur cyclists and characterises some
of the physiological attributes necessary for success in cycling at the 61ite level.
Introduction
Cycling is one of the m o s t efficient forms of h u m a n locomotion requiring less
energy per u n i t m a s s per unit distance t h a n a n y form of land transportation
(Brooks, 1989; Wilson, 1973). However, unlike walking or running, d u I ~ g cycling
m a n is combined with a machine: accordingly, there are n u m e r o u s p e r m u t a t i o n s
b y which p e r f o r m a n c e c a n be modified a n d improved. The power required to cycle
at a given velocity d e p e n d s on a complex interaction of m a n y physiological (ie. a n
athlete's maximal oxygen u p t a k e [VO2max], lactate threshold [LT], e c o n o m y of
movement, gross mechanical efficiency), environmental (wind velocity, temper-
ature, humidity, altitude) a n d m e c h a n i c a l (type of bicycle, wheels, tyres a n d
components) variables. A recent article in this j o u r n a l described the physiological
d e t e r m i n a n t s of e n d u r a n c e cycling p e r f o r m a n c e in moderate to weB-trained
cyclists (Coyle, 1999). Here, we p r e s e n t novel d a t a on the physiology and bio-
energetics of the world class t r a c k a n d road cyclist during competition.
Nomenclature and criteria for classification of a World Class
cyclist
There is no c o n s e n s u s in the scientific literature as to w h a t constitutes a n '61ite',
'world-class', 'trained', 'well trained' or a n 'untrained' cyclist. Subjects in several
published studies have b e e n classified as '61ite cyclists' w h e r e a s subjects with
similar physiological characteristics have b e e n t e r m e d 'moderately-trained' in
414
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
Table 1: Criteria for the classification of trained, well-trained, elite and World Classroad cyclists.
The capacity and power of the aerobic and anaerobic systems for producing
adenosine triphosphate (ATP) has been estimated from a n u m b e r of studies
undertaken on h u m a n s performing maximal cycling exercise (Bogdanis, et al.,
1996; Boobis, et al., 1982; McCartney, et al., 1983) and taking muscle biopsy
samples from the vastus lateralis muscle immediately before and after the
workbout. When combined with measurements of an individual's VO2max,
maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD), anaerobic or LT a n d / o r VO 2
kinetics for the aerobic energy system and deficit kinetics for the anaerobic
system (Bangsbo, et al., 1990; Craig, et al., 1993; Gastin & Lawson, 1994; Medbo
& Tabata, 1989; Medbo, et al., 1988; Withers, et al., 1993), the power and
capacity of an energy system can be quantified. By measuring the gross
mechanical efficiency (ie. the power output relative to the oxygen uptake [VO2] to
produce that power), it is possible to estimate the external power of a biological
system from the following equation:
416
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
417
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
Table2: Currentworld record times for selectedtrack cyclingeventsand estimationsof the contributionsfrom the
energysystems.
estimate the mechanical power requirements of the different track cycling events.
While such models have been reasonably accurate (Martin, et al., 1998), the SRM
bicycle crank dynamometer has made it possible to accurately quantify instan-
taneous power output during track cycling. An additional feature of the SRM
dynamometer is that it can also provide useful information to the sport scientist
and coach for assessing a rider's technique and bike handling sldlls (Walsh,
C.B.V. personal conmmnication). As such, there are now data characterising the
demands of 6lite track cyclists during international competition.
4,000 m team pursuit
Broker et al. (1999) were the first to report SRM power output profiles on elite
track cyclists during simulated competition. These workers collected data on
seven members of the United States 4,000 m pursuit team during a 2,000 m
ridden at a speed (60 km/h) which would place a team in first position at most
international competitions. When cycling at this speed, the riders in first, second,
third and fourth position generated average power outputs of 607_+45, 430_+39,
389_+32 and 389_+33 W, respectively. In relative terms, riders in second, third and
fourth positions only needed to generate 71, 64 and 640/0 of the power output
sustained by the lead cyclist. When the data were averaged over all four riding
positions, it ranged from 70-75% (425-455 W) of the power of the lead rider
(Broker et al. 1999). These data are in good agreement with that collected on elite
Australian team pursuit cyclists during the 1998 World Cup. These data, which
are the first to profile power output during 6lite track competition, are displayed
in Table 3.
418
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
Table3". Power output data collectedon the Australianmen's Nationalteam duringa 4000 m team pursuit race in
a 1998WorldCupevent.
1400 250
HR
1200
2OO ~"
A- E E
1000
PO 150
800
t~
08 000 100 "~"
D...
400
~-tj
5o ~
200
0 I , 'l | RPM 0
0 0.5 1 1,5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4,5
Time (rain)
Figure 1: Poweroutput (PO),heart rate (HPJ,cadence(RPM)and speedprofile for a cyclist riding a 4000m team
pursuit race duringa WorldCupcompetition.
The average power output of 607 W reported by Broker et al. (1999) for their
lead rider is higher than the 581 W value found for Australian riders under
competition conditions (Table 3). Such a discrepancy can probably be explained
by the differences in riding speed: the data of Broker et al. (1999) were
'normalised' for a riding speed of 60 k m / h , whereas the actual speed during the
World Cup competition was 56-58 k m / h . In addition, riding skill and technique,
riding position, body mass and frontal surface area, equipment design and
environmental and track conditions would all be expected to affect riding speed
and the power output necessary to sustain that speed. Although the average
power output data provide useful information as to the minimum requirements of
a 4,000 m team pursuit, the individual rider profile highlights the stochastic
demands of this event. Figure 1 presents the power profile, cadence, speed and
HR response of a rider during a 4,000 m team pursuit in World Cup competition.
419
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
Instantaneous power output was -1,250 W at the start and only dropped to
<1,000 W after the first 8-10 s of the race. Thereafter, depending on the rider's
position in the team, power output fluctuates between 600-650 W in the lead
position and 350-400 W when riding behind other team members. This clearly
illustrates the stochastic power demands of team pursuit racing and highlights
the need for rapid response times to accelerate and decelerate into team
formation, depending on the rider's position within the race.
1200
1000
800
D.
600
400
n
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4,5
Time (min)
Figure 2: Poweroutput profile for a male cyclistriding a 4,000mindividualpursuit and a female cyclistridinga 3,000m
individual pursuit race during WorldCup competition.
420
The Bioenergeticsof World ClassCycling
421
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
Recently, Padilla et al. (2000) determined the exercise intensity during time
trials in a group of professional cyclists by monitoring HR. Heart rate w a s
recorded in a number of time-trials, including prologues (<10 km), short time-
trials (<40 km), long time-trials (>40 km) and uphill time-trials. These workers
reported significant difference in HR's between the various time trials, which was
largely a fimction of the different duration of the events. The highest HRs were
recorded durtng the short prologues (~88-90% of HRmax). The short time-trials of
27.0-36.5 k m were raced at 82-88% of HRmax and the longer (49 km) time trials
were raced at a slightly lower intensity of between 79 and 84% of HRmax. Speeds
in these events on relatively level roads averaged 4 6 . 3 k m / h , 4 3 . 1 k m / h and
4 4 . 7 k m / h respectively. As would be expected, speed in the uphill time-trial w a s
significantly lower (40 km/h). Similarly, Lucia et al. (1999) reported that during
a 60 k m time-trial in the Tour de France, cyclists spent 95% of race time (70 min)
at HR between 88% and 100% of HRmax. In that time trial, it w a s estimated that
the winner maintained an intensity of >90% of VO2max for 70 min, averaging 50
k m / h . It should be noted, however, that time-trials within stage races m a y not
1400 100
1200
1000
-',~\ "!, ' ,;,,,i', ,'~,~',,, ~, . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
/", ~z~/'~
I " , ,gv', f 40
800
600
¢ -20
400
200
F ~'t -80
0
0;45 1 ;00 1:15 1:30 1:45
T i m e {h:min}
4O0
8O
200 ~ ~ ~,
60
40 A
.E
20 ~
600
-20 el
4OO
-40
2OO
-60
0 -80
0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30
Time (h:min)
Figure 3: Power output (--) and speed (-----) for a male professionalcyclistriding a 30kin (1A) and a 381o11(1B) uphill
time trial.
422
The Bioenergeticsof World ClassCycling
always be raced at maximal level. The role of a n individual rider within a team
often determines the intensity at which a time trial is raced. This is illustrated by
the findings of Padilla et al (2000). Riders who were aiming at a high overall
ranking rode the 27-70 k m time trials at a n intensity of 81-88% of Wmax, whereas
riders with a strategic role, rode at a slightly lower intensity of 75%-81% of Wmax.
Riding "slow" is not an option for any rider because if riders do not finish each
days stage within a certain time s p a n from the winner (usually 10%) they are
eliminated from the overall race.
Using a power-measuring device, we have collected data dining time trials in
major international races. The HR's measured during these time-trials is in good
agreement with data from previous studies (Lucia, et al., 1999, Padilla, et al.,
2000). Because power output data are highly individual and dependent on a
cyclist's m a s s and anthropometric profile, equipment and, position on the bicycle,
this data will be presented as a case study. The data of an uphill time-trial of a
professional cyclist are displayed in Figure 3.
The average power output during this 30 k m time trial was 381+61 W for an
average speed of 30_+ 11 k m / h . Whereas most time-trials on a fiat course will be
characterised by a relatively constant power profile, this uphill time trial displays
a highly intermittent profile with power outputs varying from 260 to 460 W, HR
ranging from 135 to 165 b e a t s / m i n and speeds as low as 17 k m / h up to 62
k m / h . A further example of a n uphill time-trial is displayed in Figure 3b. This 38
k m time-trial was predominantly uphill, b u t included a downhill section. Average
power output was 320_+148 W and average speed 33.1 k m / h : this illustrates the
dissociation between speed and power output (Figure 3b). As h a s been noted
previously, (Jeukendrup & Van Diemen, 1998), speed is often a poor indicator of
the exercise intensity during cycling, especially when riding on hilly terrain. In the
mountains, speed and exercise intensity seem almost inversely related: the
highest speed is recorded at the lowest power output in a downhill section of the
race (Figure 3b).
The power output recorded with power measuring devices corresponds to the
power outputs calculated from heart rate via a pre-determined relationship
between power output and HR in a laboratory (Grazzi, et al., 1999; Padilla, et al.,
2000). Padilla et al. (2000) estimated that the power output during uphill time
trials was 331-376 W, representing 75-83% of Wmax. There are also case reports
of world h o u r record holders, indicating the extreme physiological d e m a n d s of
time trials (Hawley & Burke, 1998; Padflla & Mujika, 2000). For example, it h a s
been estimated that the current world record holder, Britain's Christopher
Boardman, had to produce an average power output of 442 W for 60 min in order
to ride at an average speed of 56.375 k m / h . This equates to an average oxygen
uptake of 5.6 L/rain or 81 m l / k g / m i n . Although such a sustainable power output
is extreme, a cyclist with a m u c h larger drag coefficient set a previous world 1 h
record of 53.040 k m by producing an estimated average power output of 510 W
(Padilla and Mujika, 2000). It can be estimated that the VO2 during this ride m u s t
have been around 6.25 L / m i n or close to 80 m l / k g / m i n . This rider had a Wmax of
572 W and was able to sustain close to 90% ofWmax for the duration!
In conclusion, professional cyclists produce exceptional power outputs (>320-
450 W) during time-trials ranging in distance from 5-70 km. The absolute power
output will depend on the duration of the time-trial, the course profile and on the
role of a cyclist within the team.
423
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
~ 8o
40 ~
8O
"T"
4O
Figure4: Heart rates determined duringindividualtime trial and team time trial races(Figureadapted from Padillaet
al., 2000).
Team time-trials
T e a m time-trials are usually part of longer stage races. T e a m s of 4-9 riders try to
cover a fixed distance (usually 100 km) as fast as possible, similar to the
individual time-trial. The physiological d e m a n d s of t e a m time-trialing differ sub-
stantially from individual time-trials, being more intermittent in nature due to the
alternating d e m a n d s of riding in first position and drafting behind the other
riders. In addition to conventional time-trials, there are also a few one-day races
in which two riders (two-ups) ride a time-trial (for example Grand Prix des Nations
and Grand Prix Eddy Merckx). Unfortunately there is very limited information on
the physiological d e m a n d s during t e a m time trials. A recent study (Padflla et al.,
2000) compared the physiological differences between individual time trials and
t e a m time trials. As can be seen (Figure 4), the t e a m time-trial is m u c h more
intermittent compared to the individual race.
Early studies have reported that drafting behind another rider/riders reduces
the oxygen cost of cycling by 25-40% (Kyle, 1979; McCole, et al., 1990). The
largest effect of drafting is seen at high speeds when a cyclist is surrounded by
other riders. Drafting is therefore a very important sldll in professional road
racing. An excellent example of this drafting skill during a road race is displayed
in Figure 5.
This world class cyclist participated in the Tour de France and while the average
speed in this 6 h level stage was 40 k m / h , this cyclists with excellent drafting
skills managed to reduce his average power output to j u s t 98 W. It can be
424
The Bioenergetics of World ClassCycling
'im
8O
(3
Figure5: Poweroutput ( - - ) and speed ( ) duringa 220kinroadrace. Thelow power ouput relative to the high
averagespeedindicatesthis rider wasa sldlleddrafter.
calculated that in optimal conditions with no wind and level roads, and with a
good aerodynamic position, riding at that speed would require ~275 W (Martin, et
al., 1998). Drafting in a team time trial, however, does not result in the same
drafting effect that a rider might obtain in the peloton. Drafting allows for some
recovery, however, as can be seen in the HR trace in Figure 4.
In conclusion, compared to individual road race time-trials, team trials are
characterised by a more intermittent nature due to the longer periods of drafting
and recovery. Average HR and power outputs, however, are comparable to
individual time trials of similar duration.
Road races
Road races typically last 60 km (criteriums) up to about 300 km and are
characterised by a mass (bunch} start. Some road races are as long as 600 km
(Paris-Brest-Paris) but most professional classics such as the Tour of Flanders,
Paris-Roubaix and the Amstel Gold race are generally 250-300 km. All riders
begin together as part of the peloton and the first rider who crosses the finish line
is the ~ n n e r , independent of finish time. Although this is an individual race with
only one rider the winner, individuals are usually members of a team and team
tactics can determine a large part of the developments and the physiological
intensity of a race. The principal concerns affecting road race performance are
team tactics and drafting. Because riders remain grouped in the peloton, only the
few who are in the front at any one time face the full effects of wind resistance,
while others can maintain the peloton's pace by drafting. Usually, breakaway
riders can outdistance the petoton only when the complex dynamics of team
support allow it. The major exception to this rule occurs when the peloton
encounters hills. The average power output during road races over 200 km
typically vary between 150 and 300 W (Jeukendrup A.E. et al. Unpublished
observations).
425
The Bioenergeticsof World ClassCycling
Criterium races are shorter road races held on a small, looped course. Riders
perform multiple circuits of the course, with high-speed sharp turns. Bike
handling skills and sprint speed become more important in this event, b u t from
a physiological point of view criteriums are very similar to other road races.
Stage races
Stage races are multiple day events combining time trials and road races (stages)
and sometimes t e a m time-trials. Stage races m a y last 2 days up to 3 wk s u c h as
the major three European stage races (The Vuelta a Espafia, The Giro d'Italia and
the Tour de France). Each day, overall classification is calculated from the Finish
position and times, and there is an overall classification with the leader of the race
being the rider with the lowest overall time. In professional stage races, s u c h as
the Tour de France, time-trial stages and m o u n t a i n stages are often crucially
important and will separate contenders from support riders (ie. domestiques) in
the overall standings, as well as winners from contenders. Stage races are usually
won or lost by very small margins (ie. 200-400 s), which, over the course of a 3
wk stage race lasting ~300,000 s represents 0.07-0.13% of total race time.
Lucia et al. (1999) recorded the HR's of eight professional cyclists during 22
stages of the Tour de France and calculated the time spent in three arbitrarily
chosen exercise intensity zones. These zones were determined by measuring
ventilatory threshold in a laboratory exercise test before the race. A first
ventilatory threshold (VTI) was determined as an increase in VE/VO 2 with a n
increase of VE/VCO2 and the departure from linearity OfVE. VTII was established
using the criteria of a n increase in b o t h VE/O 2 and VE/VCO 2. While
acknowledging the limitations of this method, and the likelihood that these
thresholds m a y have changed during the 22 d of the Tour de France, the data give
an indication of the physiological d e m a n d s of cycling in stage races. Cyclists spent
71, 23, and 8 h in the low-, medium- and high-intensity zones respectively. The
relative contributions were 70%, 23% and 7% of total race time. However, there
were substantial differences between time-trials, fiat stages, high m o u n t a i n
stages, and m e d i u m mountain stages, and between riders depending on their role
within the team.
Associated with the high power outputs sustained by these cyclists over
prolonged periods are very high daffy energy expenditures. Saris et al. (1989)
studied cyclists during the Tour de France using doubly labelled water techniques
and estimated that energy expenditure was 24 M J / d (5,700 kcal/d) with extremes
of up to 40 M J / d a y (9,500 kcal/d) during very long, m o u n t a i n o u s stages. More
recently power output was m e a s u r e d during stages of the Tour de France and it
was demonstrated that the average power output over a 6 h stage was over 240
W with a n estimated energy expenditure of 24 MJ or 5,700 k c a l / d (Jeukendrup
2000). Garcia-Roves et al (1997) reported average energy intakes during the
Vuelta Ciclista a Espafia of 23.5 MJ/d. These data suggest that energy
expenditures reported for riders during stages of the Tour de France in the late
1990's have not changed considerably from those determined in the late 1980's.
With such extreme and high absolute energy expenditures (Brouns et al., 1989,
J e u k e n d r u p , 2000; Saris, 1997; Saris, et al., 1989;) these cyclists have major
problems maintaining energy balance. While eating large a m o u n t s during the race
is impractical or even impossible, time to eat is mainly limited to breakfast and
dinner. Appetite is suppressed immediately after exhausting exercise, which sets
426
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
73
72
71
~ 7o
.~ 69
~ 68
67
66
65
5 10 15 20
Time (days)
a further hurdle for a large food intake. However, despite conditions that make it
difficult for riders to maintain energy balance, body mass d u i ~ g long stage races
like the Tour de France is remarkably well maintained. The body weight of 6
cyclists participating in the Tour de France was recorded daily for 20 d in the
morning after an overnight fast and after voiding (Jeukendrup A.E. Unpublished
observations). Figure 6 shows that although, there was a trend towards a
decreasing body mass at the end of the 3 wk race, this decrease was modest and
not statistically significant.
PhySiOlogical measurements of world class track and road
CyCliStS
With recent advances in the physiological testing of athletes, along with
monitoring training and racing responses, it is slowly becoming accepted that
sport science can make valid contributions to assist coaches in the preparation of
their athletes. However, only recently have data on some of the physiological
characteristics of 61ite amateur and professional cyclists been published (Craig, et
al., 1998; Hawley & Burke, 1998; Jeukendrup & Van Diemen, 1998; Padilla, et
al., 1999). It is of note that most of these data have been obtained from male
cyclists: there is currently little published information on the physiological profiles
of 61ite female cyclists.
Unfortunately there have been few attempts to identify the key physiological
variables associated with 6lite track cyclists. However, an examination of long-
itudinal data collected from the Australian Institute of Sport's track cycling
laboratory (Craig, N P., unpublished observations), in conjunction with previously
published modelling data (Craig, et al., 1993; Olds, et al., 1993) provide an insight
into the major factors impacting on success in international track cycling. One of
the variables frequently discussed by coaches, sport scientists and cyclists is body
mass, which increases the energy cost of acceleration, rolling resistance and the
projected frontal area of the cyclist (and hence air resistance). Olds et al. (1995)
have estimated that an extra fat mass of 2 kg would increase a 4,000 m individual
427
The Bioenergetics of World ClassCycling
2" 651 r * 1
i
g
E
FT TT AT UH FT ~ AT UH
Figure~ The maximal physiological characteristics of professional cyclists (n=24). F[ fiat terrain; T[, time-trial; AT,all
terrain; UH, uphill. See text for details. All values are mean+-SD.Data arefrom Padllla et al. (1999). * P<0.05
428
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
the FT and TiC riders were significantly higher t h a n the UH riders. The highest
Wmax values were m e a s u r e d in the FT riders (461+39 W), which was higher t h a n
AT and UH (432+27 and 404_+34 W, P<0.05). T r (457_+46 W) was also significantly
higher t h a n UH (P<0.05). Absolute VO2max values were also significantly higher
in FT and TI" t h a n UH (5.67_+0.44 and 5.65_+0.53 versus 5.05_+0.39 L/min;
P<0.05), b u t none of these were different from AT (5.36+0.30 L/min). These
findings are predictable based on the specialised role of the team members, and
several anthropometric m e a s u r e m e n t s (not shown) which reveal that the FT and
T r riders were also taller, heavier, and had greater body surface areas t h a n their
AT and UH counterparts. However, when these s a m e parameters are expressed
relative to a riders body m a s s (BM), a different picture emerges, with the UH riders
gaining the ascendancy. The UH riders have the highest power: BM ratio (6.47
(0.33 W/kg) followed by Tr, AT and FT (6.41_+0.12, 6.35_+0.18 and 6.04-+0.29
W/kg, respectively). These values were significantly different between UH and NF.
VO2maxvalues expressed relative to BM were significantly lower in FT t h a n all
other groups (74.4_+3.0 versus 79.2_+1.1, 78.9-+1.9 and 80.9_+3.9 n l l / k g / m i n for
TF, AT and UH; P<0.05).
Although the m a m m a l data reported on these professional cyclists (Padilla et al.
1999) is impressive, perhaps the single m o s t striking physiological attribute of
these riders is their submaMmal exercise capacity, determined by the power
output (W) at the individual LT, defined as the exercise intensity that elicited a 1
mM increase in blood lactate above baseline concentrations when riding at -50-
60% of VO2max(Coyle, et al., 1983). Both FT and TT riders had higher power
outputs at LT t h a n did AT and UH riders (356_+31,357_+41,322_+43 and 308_+46
W respectively). Perhas to emphasise the point, it h a s previously been reported
that in a group of 6lite cyclists whose average 40 kin time was ~54 min, power
output at LT was 311 W (Coyle, et al., 1991). As m o s t professional cyclists com-
plete time-trial races of this distance at speeds in excess of 50 k m / h , with m a n y
riders able to sustain power outputs over 400 W for the duration (see section on
time trials), sport scientists need to exercise caution when classifying their subject
pool (see subsequent section).
Another interesting observation is t h a t gross efficiency m e a s u r e d in
professional road cyclists is high b u t not markedly different to well-trained riders.
Gross efficiency was recently assessed in a group of 16 professional cyclists
during a n incremental exercise test. Gross efficiency was 21.4_+0.2% (Jeukendrup
A. E. Unpublished observations). This value is slightly higher t h a n values reported
for cyclists of a lower ability level (Coyle, et al., 1992). In that study, Coyle et al.
(1992) suggested that cycling efficiency was related to the percentage of type I
muscle fibres: the more type I fibres a cyclists possessed then the higher their
efficiency. Indeed, these workers observed that at a given power output, two
cyclists could vary by as m u c h as 15-20% in their absolute oxygen cost for cycling
(Coyle, et al., 1992). These workers reported that a group of cyclists with a high
proportion of type I fibres (67_+40/0) were capable of generating higher power output
(10%) t h a n a group whose m u s c u l a t u r e contained a lower (53_+6%) percentage of
type I fibres (Coyle, et al., 1992). It was also concluded that cycling performance
was largely determined by gross efficiency, suggesting that a large percentage type
I muscle fibres is a necessary prerequisite for success as a professional cyclist
(Burke, et al., 1977; Coyle, et al., 1992).
At present, however, a causal relationship between muscle fibre type and gross
429
The Bi0e'nergetics of World ClassCycling
431
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
C.B.V. (1995). Influence of test duration and event specificity on maximal accumulated
oxygen deficit of high performance track cyclists. International J o u r n a l of Sports Medicine
16: 534-540.
Craig, N. P., Walsh, C., Martin, D., Woolford, S., Bourdon, P.C., Stanef, T., Barnes, P. & Savage,
B. (1998). High performance track, road and mountain cyclists. Test m e t h o d s manual:
sport specific guidelines for the physiological a s s e s s m e n t of elite athletes, C. J. Gore,
ed., Australian Sports Commission, Canberra.
Garcia-Roves, P., N. Terrados, et al. (1997}. Macronutrients intake of top level cyclists during
continuous competition-change in the feeding pattern. International Journal of Sports
Medicine 19: 61-67.
Gastin, P. (1998). Energetics of high intensity running. Modern Athlete and Coach 36: 3-9.
Gastin, P.B., & Lawson, D.L. (1994). Variable resistance all-out test to generate accumulated
oxygen deficit and predict anaerobic capacity. European Journal of Applied Physiology 69:
331-336.
Grazzi, G., N. Aifieri, C. Borsetto, I. Casoni, F. Manfredini, G. Mazzoni, & F. Conconi (1999). The
power output/heart rate relationship in cycling: test standardization and repeatability.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 31: 1478-1483.
Hawley, J.A., and Burke, L.M. (1998). The limits to human performance. In: Peak performance:
Training and nutritional strategies for sport, pp.402-406.
Hawley, J.A., Myburgh, K.H., Noakes, T.D., & Dennis, S.C. (1997). Training techniques to
improve fatigue resistance and enhance endurance performance. Journal of Sports
S c i e n c e s 15: 325-333.
Hawley, J.A., & Noakes, T.D. (1992). Peak power predicts maximal oxygen uptake and
performance time in trained cyclists. European Journal of Applied Physiology 65: 79-83.
Jeukendrup, A. E., Saris, W.H.M., Brouns, F., & Kester, A.D.M. (1996). A new validated
endurance performance test. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise 28: 266-270.
Jeukendrup, A.E., & Van Diemen, A. (1998). Heart rate monitoring duling training and
competition in cyclists. Journal of Sports S c i e n c e s 16: $91-$99.
Jeukendrup, A. E. (2000). Cycling. IOC Encyclopaedia of Sports Medicine: Nutrition in Sport.
R. J. Maughan (Editor)., BlackweU Science, Oxford, pp.562-573.
Keen, P. (1994). The truth behind the race of truth. Cycle Sport 7: 46-50.
Kyle, C.R. (1979). Reduction of ~ n d resistance and power output of racing cyclists and runners
travelling in groups. Ergonomics 22: 387-397.
Kyle, C. R. (1994). Energy and aerodynamics in cycling. Clinics in Sports Medicine 13: 39-73.
Lindsay, F. H., Hawley, J.A., Myburgh, K.H., Schomer, H.H., Noakes, T.D., & Dennis, S.C. (1996).
Improved athletic performance in highly trained cyclists after interval training. Medicine and
S c i e n c e in Sports and Exercise 28: 1427-1434.
Lucia, A., J. Hoyos, A. Carvajal, & J. L. Chicharro. (1999) Heart rate response to professional road
cycling: the Tour de France. International Journal of Sports Medicine 20:167-72.
Martin, J.C., D.L. Milliken, J.E. Cobb, K.L. McFadden, & A.R. Coggan. (1998). Validation of a
mathematical model for road-cycling power. J o u r n a l of Applied B i o m e c h a n i c s 14:276-291.
McCamaey, N., Heigenhauser, G.J.F., & Jones, N.L. (1983) Power output and fatigue of human
muscle in maximal cycling exercise. J o u r n a l of Applied Physiology 55:218-224.
McCole, S.D., Claney, K., Conte, J.C., Anderson, R., Hagberg, J.M. (1990). Energy expenditure
during bicycling. Journal of Applied Physiology 68: 748-53.
Medbo, ,J.I., Burgers, S. (1990). Effect of training on the anaerobic capacity. Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise 22: 501-507.
Medbo, J. I., Mohn, A.C., Tabata, I., & Sejersted, O.M. (1988). Anaerobic capacity determined by
maximal accumulated 02 deficit. J o u r n a l of Applied Physiology: 64:50-60.
Medbo, J.L., & Tabata, I. (1989). Relative importance of aerobic and anaerobic energy release
during short-term exhausting bicycle exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology 67: 1881-
1886.
Olds, T. S., Norton, K., & Craig, N.P. (1993). Mathematical model of cycling performance. Journal
of Applied Physiology 75: 730-737.
Olds, T.S., Norton, K., Craig, N.P., Olive, S., & Lowe, E. (1995). The limits of the possible: Models
of power supply and demand in cycling. The Australian Journal of Science and Medicine
in Sport 27: 29-33.
Padilla, S., Mujika, I., Cuesta, G., & Goiriena, J. (1999}. Level ground and uphill cycling ability
in professional road cycling. Medicine and S c i e n c e in Sports and Exercise 31: 878-885.
Padilla, S., & Mujika, I. Scientific approach to the 1-h cycling world record. A case study (2000}.
432
The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling
433