Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The energy density per atomic transition of ionizing radiation is very high; it can break
apart molecules and induce ionization, which is not achieved by mere heating. This is the
reason for both new effects and new concerns. The treatment of solid food by ionizing
radiation can provide an effect similar to heat pasteurization of liquids, such as milk.
However, the use of the term "cold pasteurization" to describe irradiated foods is
controversial, since pasteurization and irradiation are fundamentally different processes.
Food irradiation is currently permitted by over 40 countries, and the volume of food so
treated is estimated to exceed 500,000 metric tons annually worldwide.
Technologies
Electron irradiation
Electron irradiation uses electrons accelerated in an electric field to a velocity close to the
speed of light. Electrons are particulate radiation and, hence, have cross section many
times larger than photons, so that they do not penetrate the product beyond a few inches,
depending on product density. Electron facilities rely on substantial concrete shields to
protect workers and the environment from radiation exposure.
Gamma irradiation
One variant of gamma irradiators keeps the Cobalt-60 under water at all times and lowers
the product to be irradiated under water in hermetic bells. No further shielding is required
for such designs.
X-ray irradiation
Similar to gamma radiation, X-rays are photon radiation of a wide energy spectrum and
an alternative to isotope based irradiation systems. X-rays are generated by colliding
accelerated electrons with a dense material (target) such as tantalum or tungsten in a
process known as bremsstrahlung-conversion. X-ray irradiators are scalable and have
deep penetration comparable to Co-60, with the added effect of using an electronic source
that stops radiating when switched off. They also permit dose uniformity. However, these
systems generally have low energetic efficiency during the conversion of electron energy
to photon radiation requiring much more electrical energy than other systems. Like most
other types of facilities, X-ray systems rely on concrete shields to protect the environment
and workers from radiation.
Nominal X-ray energy is usually limited to 5 MeV; however. Another development is the
availability of electron accelerators with extremely high power output, up to 1,000 kW
beam. At a conversion efficiency of up to 12%, the X-ray power may reach (including
filtering and other losses) 100 kW; This power would be equivalent to a gamma facility
with Co-60 of about 6.5 MCi.
Some foods, particularly fruits and vegetables, are not available for sale on the global
market unless treated to prolong shelf life for transportation. This may include radiation
processing. However, this application has not yet been exploited. In contrast, irradiation
to eliminate insect pests to fulfill quarantine requirements is gaining commercial
significance.
The actual cost of food irradiation is influenced by dose requirements, the food's
tolerance of radiation, handling conditions, i.e., packaging and stacking requirements,
construction costs, financing arrangements, and other variables particular to the situation.
Irradiation is a capital-intensive technology requiring a substantial initial investment,
ranging from $1 million to $5 million. In the case of large research or contract irradiation
facilities, major capital costs include a radiation source (cobalt-60), hardware (irradiator,
totes and conveyors, control systems, and other auxiliary equipment), land (1 to
1.5 acres), radiation shield, and warehouse. Operating costs include salaries (for fixed and
variable labor), utilities, maintenance, taxes/insurance, cobalt-60 replenishment, general
utilities, and miscellaneous operating costs
Consumer protection
Irradiation has not been widely adopted due to an asserted negative public perception, the
concerns expressed by some consumer groups and the reluctance of many food
producers. Consumer organizations, environmentalist groups, and opponents to food
irradiation refer to some studies suggesting that a large part of the public questions the
safety of irradiated foods, and will not buy foods that have been irradiated. On the other
hand, other studies indicate the number of consumers concerned about the safety of
irradiated food has decreased in the last 10 years and continues to be less than the number
of those concerned about pesticide residues, microbiological contamination, and other
food related concerns. The number of people reporting no concerns about irradiated food
is among the lowest for food issues, comparable to that of people with no concern about
food additives and preservatives. Consumers, given a choice and access to the real
irradiated product, appear ready to buy it in considerably large numbers.
Safety aspects
Safety, security and wholesomeness aspects
Alternatives
Other methods to reduce several pathogens in food include heat-pasteurization, ultra-high
temperature processing, UV radiation, ozone or fumigation with ethylene oxide. For
quarantine purposes, insect pests can also be eliminated by fumigation with methyl
bromide or aluminum phosphine, vapour heat, forced hot air, hot water dipping, or cold
treatment. Other methods to extend shelf life of food items include modified atmosphere
packaging, carbon monoxide, dehydration, vacuum packaging, freezing and flash
freezing as well as chemical additives.
Opponents to food irradiation and consumer activists (cf. Public Citizen) maintain that
the best alternative to food irradiation to reduce pathogens is in good agricultural
practices. For example, farmers and processing plants should improve sanitation
practices, water used for irrigation and processing should be regularly tested for E. coli,
and production plants should be routinely inspected. Concentrated animal feeding
operations near farmland where produce is grown should be regulated.
Proponents of food irradiation have said that practices of organic farming can only reduce
the extent of the microorganism load. They assert that residual flora including pathogen
germs always persist, and that processing by ionizing radiation could be the ultimate
measure to practically eliminate such risks.
Yes. Irradiated foods are wholesome and nutritious. All known methods of food
processing and even storing food at room temperature for a few hours after harvesting
can lower the content of some nutrients, such as vitamins. At low doses of radiation,
nutrient losses are either not measurable or, if they can be measured, are not significant.
At the higher doses used to extend shelf-life or control harmful bacteria, nutritional losses
are less than or about the same as cooking and freezing.
No. Radioactivity in foods can occur by two routes: contamination of foods with
radioactive substances or by penetration of energy into the nuclei of the atoms that make
up the food. The irradiation process involves passing food through an irradiation field;
however, the food itself never contacts a radioactive substance. Also, the ionizing
radiation used by irradiators is not strong enough to disintegrate the nucleus of even one
atom of a food molecule.
Irradiation, at the levels normally used in food processing, destroys most, but not
necessarily every single microorganism present; it does not sterilize the food. As with any
food, consumers must take appropriate precautions, such as refrigeration and proper
handling and cooking, to make sure that potentially harmful organisms do not present a
problem. After treatment, the surviving disease-causing and food spoilage organisms may
start to multiply again if the food is not properly handled. The disease-causing organisms
in irradiated food are just as dangerous, but not more so, as the same organisms in non-
irradiated food. One concern has been that irradiation does not kill the bacteria that
causes botulism. However, studies also have shown that in both irradiated and non-
irradiated food, spoilage organisms will grow and alert consumers to spoilage before
botulism-causing bacteria can produce toxin.
Does irradiation cause chemical changes in food, producing substances not known
to be present in non-irradiated food?
Yes, irradiation does produce chemical changes in foods. These substances, called "radio-
lytic products", may sound mysterious, but they are not. They have been scrutinized by
scientists in making safety assessments of irradiated foods. Any kind of treatment causes
chemical changes in food. For instance, heat treatment, or cooking, produces chemicals
that could be called "thermolytic products." Scientists find the changes in food created by
irradiation minor to those created by cooking. The products created by cooking are so
significant that consumers can smell and taste them, whereas only a chemist with
extremely sensitive lab equipment may be able to detect radiolytic products.
No. The use and transportation of radioactive materials, including the facilities in which
they are used and the equipment in those facilities, is closely monitored by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, state agencies and the Department of Transportation. The
radioactive material itself is sealed within two layers of metal that prevent corrosion and
oxidation. When shipped, it is placed within brick layers of lead that prevent gamma rays
from escaping. Facilities must include many safety features to prevent both
environmental and worker exposure. For example, when radioactive cobalt is in the
storage position in an irradiator, it is under water and otherwise shielded. The irradiator is
operated by remote control, and many other protections are required to prevent workers
form entering the irradiation enclosure.
References
1. ^ a b c anon., Food Irradiation — A technique for preserving and improving the safety of
food, WHO, Geneva, 1991
2. ^ NUCLEUS — Food Irradiation Clearances
3. ^ Food irradiation, Position of ADA, J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:246-253.
http://www.mindfully.org/Food/Irradiation-Position-ADA.htm retrieved 2007-11-15
4. ^ C.M. Deeley, M. Gao, R. Hunter, D.A.E. Ehlermann, The development of food
irradiation in the Asia Pacific, the Americas and Europe; tutorial presented to the
International Meeting on Radiation Processing, Kuala Lumpur, 2006.
<ef>http://www.iiaglobal.org/index.php?
mact=News,cntnt01,detail,0&cntnt01articleid=488&cntnt01detailtemplate=resourceCent
er-publication-detail-template&cntnt01returnid=231&hl=en_US last visited 2010-02-18
5. ^ Kume, T. et al., Status of food irradiation in the world, Radiat.Phys.Chem. 78(2009),
222-226
6. ^ Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA,
International Database on Insect Disinfestation and Sterilization — IDIDAS —
http://www-ididas.iaea.org/IDIDAS/default.htm last visited 2007-11-16
7. ^ EU: Food Irradiation — Community Legislation
http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/irradiation/comm_legisl_en.htm
8. K. Mehta, Radiation Processing Dosimetry — A practical manual, 2006, GEX
Corporation, Centennial, USA
9. D.A.E. Ehlermann, The RADURA-terminology and food irradiation, Food Control 20
(2009), 526-528, doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.07.023
10. ^ Minck, F. (1896) Zur Frage über die Einwirkung der Röntgen'schen Strahlen auf
Bacterien und ihre eventuelle therapeutische Verwendbarkeit. Münchener Medicinische
Wochenschrift 43 (5), 101-102.
11. ^ S.C. Prescott,The effect of radium rays on the colon bacillus, the diphtheria bacillus
and yeast. Science XX(1904) no.503, 246-248
12. ^ Appleby, J. and Banks, A. J. Improvements in or relating to the treatment of foodstuffs,
more especially cereals and their products. British patent GB 1609 (January 4, 1906).
13. ^ D.C. Gillet, Apparatus for preserving organic materials by the use of x-rays, US Patent
No. 1,275,417 (1918-08-13)