PTO Form (Rev 4/2000)

OMB No. 0651-.... (Exp. 08/31/2004)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action

The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 77788382
LAW OFFICE
LAW OFFICE 110
ASSIGNED
MARK SECTION (no change)
ARGUMENT(S)
Applicant's mark and the registered mark are not likely to be confused given the differences in the
services and the marks themselves. Applicant hereby incorporates the arguments made previously in its
March 18, 2010 response to office action.

FURTHERMORE, Applicant and registrant have entered into a consent agreement whereby Registrant
agrees that the marks are not likely to be confused and registrant consent to registration of the
Applicant's mark. See attached Consent Agreement at Paragraph 10.

Wherefore, Applicant requests the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal and approve the mark for
publication.
EVIDENCE SECTION
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)

ORIGINAL PDF FILE evi_69173799-083703442_._GOLOOKONAGREEMENT_Fully_Signed.pdf

CONVERTED PDF
FILE(S) \\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\777\883\77788382\xml1\RFR0002.JPG
(3 pages)

\\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\777\883\77788382\xml1\RFR0003.JPG
\\TICRS\EXPORT11\IMAGEOUT11\777\883\77788382\xml1\RFR0004.JPG
DESCRIPTION OF
EVIDENCE FILE
Consent Agreement between Applicant and the cited Registrant.

SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /ErikMPelton/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Erik M. Pelton
SIGNATORY'S
 POSITION
Attorney of Record; NJ, DC Bar Member

DATE SIGNED 10/08/2010

AUTHORIZED
YES
SIGNATORY

CONCURRENT APPEAL
NOTICE FILED
NO

FILING INFORMATION SECTION

SUBMIT DATE Fri Oct 08 08:42:21 EDT 2010
USPTO/RFR-69.17.37.99-201
01008084221285443-7778838
TEAS STAMP 2-470641b3e9ab4a2c68da06d
66a834735d88-N/A-N/A-2010
1008083703442198

PTO Form (Rev 4/2000)

OMB No. 0651-.... (Exp. 08/31/2004)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action

To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
Application serial no. 77788382 has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

Applicant's mark and the registered mark are not likely to be confused given the differences in the
services and the marks themselves. Applicant hereby incorporates the arguments made previously in its
March 18, 2010 response to office action.

FURTHERMORE, Applicant and registrant have entered into a consent agreement whereby Registrant
agrees that the marks are not likely to be confused and registrant consent to registration of the Applicant's
mark. See attached Consent Agreement at Paragraph 10.

Wherefore, Applicant requests the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal and approve the mark for
publication.

EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of Consent Agreement between Applicant and the cited Registrant. has been
attached.
Original PDF file:
evi_69173799-083703442_._GOLOOKONAGREEMENT_Fully_Signed.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) (3 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3

SIGNATURE(S)
Request for Reconsideration Signature
Signature: /ErikMPelton/ Date: 10/08/2010
Signatory's Name: Erik M. Pelton
Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record; NJ, DC Bar Member

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the
highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal
territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an associate thereof; and to
the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian
attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in
this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power
of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to
withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the
applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing
him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

The applicant is not filing a Notice of Appeal in conjunction with this Request for Reconsideration.

Serial Number: 77788382

Internet Transmission Date: Fri Oct 08 08:42:21 EDT 2010
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RFR-69.17.37.99-201010080842212854
43-77788382-470641b3e9ab4a2c68da06d66a83
4735d88-N/A-N/A-20101008083703442198