Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted By
SANTHOSH HEGDE
Registration Number:
04XQCM6077
1
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
DECLARATION
Place:
2
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
GUIDE’S CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Research Report entitled “TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND
ITS RELEVANCE”, done by SANTHOSH HEGDE bearing Registration No.04
XQCM 6077 is a bonafide work done carried under my guidance during the academic
year 2005-06 in a partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of MBA degree by
Bangalore University. To the best of my knowledge this report has not formed the basis
for the award of any other degree.
Date :
3
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
PRINCIPAL’S CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that this dissertation entitled "Technical analysis and its
relevance” is the result of research project work carried out by
Mr.Santhosh Hegde under the guidance and supervision of Prof. B, V
Rudramurthy, M.P. Birla Institute of Management, Bangalore.
Date: Principal
4
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Finance, for his significant advice and suggestions at every stage of the project.
Further, I would like to thank all my lovely friends who have directly
Place:
Date: Santhosh Hegde
5
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 LITERATIVE REVIEW 11
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 18
4 PROBLEM STATEMENT 18
6 DATA ANALYSIS 26
7 CHARTS 50
8 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS 74
9 RESEARCH FINIDINGS 78
10 SUMMARY 78
11 CONCLUSION 79
12 GLOSSARY 81
13 BIBLIOGRAPGY 82
6
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
CHAPTER -1
INTRODUCTION 7
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
It is important to form a view on the likely trend of the over all market, and it is helpful
to have some idea of how to go about selecting individual stocks. Naturally, all investors
would like their investments to appreciate rapidly in price, but stocks, which may satisfy
this wish, tend to accompanied by a substantially greater amount of risk then many
investors are normally willing to accept. However, it is important to understand that
investors can be very conscious when it comes to stock ownership.
Primarily, but not exclusively, technical analysis is conducted by studying charts of past
price movement. Many different methods and tools are used in technical analysis, but
they all rely on the assumption that price patterns and trends exist in markets, and that
they can be identified and exploited Technical analysis does not try to analyze the
financial data of a company such as cash flow, dividends and projection of future
dividends. That type of analysis is called Fundamental analysis. Nor does it claim to be
100% accurate. It attempts to give the "most likely" outcome.
Some speculators combine elements from both technical and fundamental analysis.
Technical analysis is viewed by many of its practitioners as more art than science. Many
academic studies conclude that technical analysis has little, if any, predictive power.
However, the practice has a dedicated following especially among active traders and does
have support amongst the academic community.
As an example of the debate regarding the efficacy of technical analysis, Peter Lynch, a
very well-known and successful fundamental analyst, once commented, "Charts are great
for predicting the past." On the other hand, the U.S. Federal Reserve once published a
8
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
study saying that certain elements of technical analysis were effective in price
forecasting.
The premises of technical analysis were derived from empirical observations of financial
markets over hundreds of years. Perhaps the oldest branch of technical analysis is the use
of candlestick techniques by Japanese traders at least as early as the 18th century, and
still very popular today.
Dow Theory, a theory based on the collected writings of Dow Jones co-founder and
editor Charles Dow, inspired the increasingly widespread use and development of
technical analysis from the end of the 19th century. Modern technical analysis considers
Dow Theory its cornerstone.
New tools and theories have been produced and existing tools have been enhanced at a
rapid rate in recent decades, with an increasing emphasis on computer-assisted
techniques.
Technical analysis is not concerned with why a price is moving but rather whether it is
moving in a particular direction or in a particular chart pattern. Technical analysts believe
that profits can be made by "trend following." In other words if a particular stock price is
steadily rising (trending upward) then a technical analyst will look for opportunities to
buy this stock. Until the technical analyst is convinced this uptrend has reversed or ended,
all else equal, he will continue to own this security. Additionally, technical analysts look
for various price patterns to form on a price chart and will take positions in anticipation
of the expected move following that pattern. The various tools of technical analysis assist
the technician in determining when trends have formed, ended, etc. and when particular
patterns are unfolding.
9
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
and reprice the security. In contrast, a technical analyst is not interested in a security's
"correct" price, only in price movement.
The beauty of technical analysis lies in its versatility. Because the principles of technical
analysis are universally applicable, each of the analysis steps above can be performed
using the same theoretical background. You don't need an economics degree to analyze a
market index chart. You don't need to be a specialist to analyze a stock chart. It does not
matter if the time frame is 2 days or 2 years. It does not matter if it is a stock, market
index or commodity. The technical principles of support, resistance, trend, trading range
and other aspects can be applied to any chart. While this may sound easy, technical
analysis is by no means easy. Success requires serious study, dedication and an open
mind.
10
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
a few hours or many years. In addition, some technical analysts include volume or open
interest figures with their study of price action.
Technical analysts believe that their methods will permit them to beat the market.
Economists have traditionally been skeptical of the value of technical analysis, affirming
the theory of efficient markets that holds no strategy should allow investors and traders to
make unusual returns except by taking excessive risk.
Technical analysis holds that because every possible bit of information is immediately
included in the price of a security, it is not necessary to explicitly analyze the
fundamental, economic, political, etc. factors that might influence that price. Because all
possible information is reflected in the price, only a study of the price movement is
required.
This theorem is similar to the strong and semi-strong forms of market efficiency.
Technical analysts believe that the current price fully reflects all information. Because all
information is already reflected in the price, it represents the fair value, and should form
the basis for analysis. After all, the market price reflects the sum knowledge of all
participants, including traders, investors, portfolio managers, buy-side analysts, sell-side
analysts, market strategist, technical analysts, fundamental analysts and many others. It
would be folly to disagree with the price set by such an impressive array of people with
impeccable credentials. Technical analysis utilizes the information captured by the price
to interpret what the market is saying with the purpose of forming a view on the future
Prices move in trends
Most technicians agree that prices trend. However, most technicians also acknowledge
that there are periods when prices do not trend. If prices were always random, it would be
extremely difficult to make money using technical analysis. A technician believes that it
11
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
is possible to identify a trend, invest or trade based on the trend and make money as the
trend unfolds. Because technical analysis can be applied to many different time frames, it
is possible to spot both short-term and long-term trends.
While it cannot be shown that prices must trend, technical analysis relies on
empirical evidence and common sense to assert that prices do trend. To a technician,
markets are trending up, trending down, or trending sideways (flat). This definition of a
price trend is essentially the one put forward by Dow Theory. A person who does not
believe that prices move in trends will find little use for technical analysis. The
assumption that prices must trend is probably the most important concept in technical
analysis.
To a technical analyst, the human characteristics of the market might be irrational, but
they exist. Because investors' attitudes often repeat, investors' actions in the marketplace
often repeat as well. I.e., patterns of price movement will develop on a chart that a
technical analyst believes have predictive qualities.
12
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
With most investors long, there are more potential sellers in the market than buyers
despite the fact that the overall attitude of investors is bullish.
Analyst Bias
Just as with fundamental analysis, technical analysis is subjective and our personal biases
can be reflected in the analysis. It is important to be aware of these biases when analyzing
a chart. If the analyst is a perpetual bull, then a bullish bias will overshadow the analysis.
On the other hand, if the analyst is a disgruntled eternal bear, then the analysis will
probably have a bearish tilt.
Open to Interpretation
Furthering the bias argument is the fact that technical analysis is open to interpretation.
Even though there are standards, many times two technicians will look at the same chart
and paint two different scenarios or see different patterns. Both will be able to come up
with logical support and resistance levels as well as key breaks to justify their position.
While this can be frustrating, it should be pointed out that technical analysis is more like
an art than a science, somewhat like economics. Is the cup half-empty or half-full? It is in
the eye of the beholder.
Too Late
Technical analysis has been criticized for being too late. By the time the trend is
identified, a substantial portion of the move has already taken place. After such a large
move, the reward to risk ratio is not great. Lateness is a particular criticism of Dow
Theory.
Even after a new trend has been identified, there is always another "important" level close
at hand. Technicians have been accused of sitting on the fence and never taking an
13
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
unqualified stance. Even if they are bullish, there is always some indicator or some level
that will qualify their opinion.
Trader's Remorse
Not all technical signals and patterns work. When you begin to study technical analysis,
you will come across an array of patterns and indicators with rules to match. For instance:
A sell signal is given when the neckline of a head and shoulders pattern is broken. Even
though this is a rule, it is not steadfast and can be subject to other factors such as volume
and momentum. In that same vein, what works for one particular stock may not work for
another. A 50-day moving average may work great to identify support and resistance for
IBM, but a 70-day moving average may work better for Yahoo. Even though many
principles of technical analysis are universal, each security will have its own
idiosyncrasies.
Lack of evidence
Although chartists assert that their techniques provide excess returns over time, this
assertion is controversial. Many academics believe that technical analysis has no
predictive power. Burton Malkiel in his book "A Random Walk Down Wall Street" (8th
edition, 2003) and Eugene Fama in "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and
Empirical Work," May 1970 Journal of Finance summarize many early studies,
conducted from the 1950s-70s, that show that after trading costs are considered, the
returns generated by many technical strategies under perform a simple buy and hold
strategy.
Critics of technical analysis include well known fundamental analysts. Warren Buffett
has exclaimed, "I realized technical analysis didn't work when I turned the charts upside
down and didn't get a different answer" and "If past history was all there was to the game,
the richest people would be librarians."
14
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
Proponents of technical analysis counter that technical analysis does not completely
contradict the efficient market hypothesis. Technicians agree with EMH in that they
believe that all available information is reflected within a security's price; that is why
technicians say a study of the price movement is necessary. Technicians argue that EMH
ignores the realities of the market place, namely that many investors base their future
expectations on past earnings, track records, etc. Because future stock prices can be
strongly influenced by investor expectations, technicians claim it only follows that past
prices can influence future prices.
Technicians point to the new field of behavioral finance. Behavioral finance essentially
says that people are not the rational participants EMH makes them out to be. Market
participants can and do act irrationally. Technicians have long held that irrational human
behavior influences stock prices and claim to have ways of predicting probable outcomes
based on this behavior.
15
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
Also, with regards to EMH and Random Walk Theory, technicians claim that both
theories ignore the realities of the marketplace. To a technician, the market is neither
composed of completely rational participants as EMH assumes (participants can be
greedy, overly risky, etc. at any given time) nor is its stock price movement completely
independent of its prior movement
16
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
17
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
CHAPTER -2
LITERATURE
REVIEW
18
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature review has under taken for analyze various literature and research papers
available in the related field. Further research can be undertaken where sufficient study is
not done in particular field. Various sources of information have been used in this review
include technical analysis books, financial journals, articles and research papers.
Research papers
1. TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND TYPICAL COGNITIVE BIASES
Piotr Zielonka, Warsaw University SGGW and Leon Kozminski Academy of
Entrepreneurship and Management, Poland
ABSTRACT
The paper describes a study carried out on a group of 24 Polish financial analysts. The
analysts responded to a questionnaire with 24 items (signals). They were asked to rate the
predictive value of different signals for the movements of stock prices. The signals were
of three types:
(a) regular technical analysis signals, representing some common psychological biases
(gambler's fallacy, ignoring the principle of regression to mean, anchoring effect and
herd behavior)
(b) technical-like signals created by the author of the research that imitated technical
signals and represented the same types of biases as real technical signals,
(c) other technical-like signals that did not represent any biases.
It turned out that the analysts tended to ascribe high predictive value to the questionnaire
items associated with psychological biases (either technical or technical-like signals). At
the same time, these items were rated very similarly by different analysts. On the other
hand, the technical-like signals not related to any biases were given very low predictive
19
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
values by the analysts. These results suggest that popularity of technical analysis is
associated with its relation to the typical cognitive biases of humans.
METHODOLOGY
The study was carried out in Warsaw in January-February 2002. The participants were 24
financial analysts or dealers employed by banks and Polish capital market institutions.
The sample was not random. Each participant was administered a 24–item questionnaire.
There were three groups of items within the questionnaire. Each group consisted of 8
items. The first group consisted of regular technical analysis signals representing four
common psychological inclinations. Each inclination was represented by two signals.
Usually one from a pair of signals was a predictor of a stock fall (-), whereas the other
signal was a predictor of a stock rise (+).
20
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
All real technical analysis signals were assigned a high predictive value by the financial
analysts who responded to the questionnaire. The “technical” signals created by the
author of the research either represented psychological biases or not. If they did, they
received high scores from respondents as good predictors the of stock market behavior. If
they did not, the respondents estimated them as bad predictors. In addition, the
respondents were in general agreement about their judgments. These results confirm both
hypotheses of this research: technical analysis signals represent some common
psychological biases and financial analysts are subject to these biases.
Most technical analysis studies are concerned with the profitability of technical trading
rules and almost all of them focus exclusively on trend following patterns. In this paper
they examine a different kind of technical indicator which suggests a structural
relationship between High, Low, and Close prices of daily exchange rates. Since, for a
given exchange rate, it can be shown that these prices have different time series
properties, it is possible to explore the structural relationships between them using
multivariate co-integration methods. This methodology facilitates the construction of
dynamic structural econometric models, which are used to derive dynamic out of- sample
forecasts over different time horizons. Compared to standard benchmarks, it turns out that
these models have extremely good forecasting properties, even when allowance has been
made for transactions costs and risk premium
21
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
22
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
Abstract
They investigate and provide interpretation for the intriguing Brock, Lakonishok, and
LeBaron (1992) finding that simple forms of technical analysis contain significant
forecast power for U.S. equity index returns. They document that the forecast ability is
partially, but not solely, attributable to return measurement errors arising from non
synchronous trading. They argue that the evidence of technical forecast power need not
be inconsistent with market efficiency. "Breakeven" one-way trading costs are computed
to be 0.39% for the full sample and 0.22% since 1975, which are small compared to
recent estimates of actual trading costs. Further, they test but fail to reject a key
restriction that most equilibrium models place on return forecast ability: that the technical
rules should not reliably identify periods of negative market risk premium.
Methodology
A. Description of the Rules.
Brock et. al. emphasize the danger of obtaining spurious empirical results if
trading rules are both discovered and tested in the same data set. They note that there is
no complete remedy for “data snooping” biases, but attempt to mitigate the problem by
using a long data series and by reporting results for all rules evaluated. To avoid
compounding the dangers of data snooping biases, they evaluate precisely the same set of
twenty six technical rules as Brock et. al. These include ten Variable Length Moving
Average (VMA) rules, ten Fixed Length Moving Average (FMA) rules, and six Trading
Range Break (TRB) rules.
23
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
B. Measuring Returns
The results reported by Brock et al. are based on percentage changes in the DJIA,
data on which was available for a long time horizon. However, some limitations of the
Dow Jones data potentially affect the interpretation of their evidence. First, changes in
the [stock index] understate actual returns due to the omission of dividends. They do not
expect this omission to have much effect on measures of differences between mean
returns during technical buy signals and mean returns during technical sell signals, or on
tests of whether the technical rules possess forecast power. However, the omission of
dividends will introduce bias to tests of whether mean returns during periods of technical
sell signals differ significantly from zero (or any other specific benchmark).
Conclusions
Brock, et. al. (1992) demonstrate that a set of relatively simple technical trading rules
possess statistically significant forecast power for changes in the Dow Jones Industrial
Average over a long sample period. They extend their analysis to ascertain whether this
evidence can be reconciled with market efficiency.
Abstract
This article reports the results of a questionnaire survey conducted in February 1995 on
the use by foreign exchange dealers in Hong Kong of fundamental and technical analyses
to form the forecasts of exchange rate movements. Findings of this study reveal that >
85% of respondents rely on both fundamental and technical analysis for predicting future
price at different time horizons. At shorter horizons, there exists a skew towards reliance
on technical analysis as opposed to fundamental analysis, but the skew becomes steadily
reversed as the length of horizon considered is extended.
24
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
METHODOLOGY
To prepare the survey, they concluded dealers at the Hong Kong monetary Authority and
most of the major banks. After consultation, they designed a questionnaire investigating
the following.
1. The usefulness of fundamental and technical analysis is forecasting trends and
turning points.
2. Dealers give personal importance to fundamental and technical analyses over
seven forecasting horizons.
3. Dealers views of the complimentarily of fundamental and technical analyses in
exchange rate forecasting.
4. The usefulness of central bank intervention in influencing exchange rates over the
horizons of intraday, intra-month and month.
The Hong Kong Forex Association with its membership list as of September 1994
provided them. A total of 153 fully completed questionnaires were returned. A response
rate of 19%. Most respondents firms are active participants in the market, with over 60%
in number having a daily average turnover greater than US $ 100 million.
Conclusion:
At all the time horizons, a very high proportion of respondents place some weight on both
fundamental and technical analysis when forming views. Dealers perceive value in using
both fundamental and technical analyses to predict both trends. Technical analysis is
considered only slightly more useful than fundamental analysis.
25
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
CHAPTER -3
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
26
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
PROBLEM STATEMENT
The above study is undertaken to compare the selected technical analysis tools available
for forecasting. The study tries to capture the contradicting views of different tools used
in technical analysis. This study is aims to exploration of the topic “TECHNICAL
ANALYSIS AND ITS RELEVANCE”.
1. To find out the accuracy of technical analysis in individual stock price prediction.
2. To introduce a structured approach to market analysis that will helps to perform a
quick top to bottom assessment of the market, to decide which actions are
appropriate
Technical analysis is very useful because it provides tools that allow investors to identify
the signs that new information is being priced into a stock before news is released. Stocks
that trade abnormally often do so because of significant new information, both positive
and negative. In this way, technical analysis helps to reveal fundamental changes in the
company before the broader market is aware of it.
27
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
In spite of a long list of publications showing that market movement is random or at least
very difficult to predict, a lot of effort has been made in forecasting future stock prices In
this dissertation, the market data is investigate to find out the future stock price
movements. The charts we will keep will become increasingly valuable to the traders as
the charts history builds up. In this connection I hope this study is resourceful to the
technical analysts. This study is useful for those who are risk avers and those who wants
to protect themselves from the risk arising from the unexpected market movements and
also this study focuses on the effectiveness of the hedged portfolio and also tests that
effectiveness
DATA:
The data collected for the research purpose are secondary data. Index prices were
collected through National Stock Exchange website and through prowess website. The
data employed in this study comprises of one year observations on the NIFTY stock
index Closing price. Daily data are preferred in this study. The choice of daily closing
price is realistic and helpful to calculate and testing the results in technical analysis.
DATABASE:
Technical analysis of stock trends, 8th Edition, Robert D. Edwards, John Magee.
Technical analysis of stock trends by Martin Pring.
Financial journals, dailies like capital market, dalal street, and Economic times are
also used.
28
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
SAMPLE SIZE:
The one year nifty index has taken for testing the relevance of technical analysis.
The two most popular types of moving averages are the daily Moving Average(SMA)
and the Exponential moving Average (EMA). In this study day moving average has
taken.
For example: a 5-day simple moving average is calculated by adding the closing prices
for the last 5 days and dividing the total by 5.
The calculation is repeated for each price bar on the chart. The averages are then joined
to form a smooth curving line - the moving average line. Continuing our example, if the
next closing price in the average is 15, then this new period would be added and the
oldest day, which is 10, would be dropped. The new 5-day simple moving average would
be calculated as follows:
29
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
averaging process then moves on to the next day where the 10-day SMA for day 12 is
calculated by adding the prices of day 3 through day 12 and dividing by 10.
Moving average crossovers can also be used as signals to buy and sell. This is normally
done in two ways: (1) by watching for price to cross whatever moving average you may
be using, or (2) running two moving averages of the same price or index, one faster than
the other, and buying or selling when the faster average crosses the slower.
The weakness of moving average buy and sell systems is that they will most likely
become unprofitable when the stock or index begins moving sideways in a narrow
trading range. Under these circumstances price never moves above or below the average
far enough to become profitable.
I don't recommend pure moving average systems for timing purposes, but, in spite of
their weaknesses, if you are trying to develop your own system of timing, the use of
moving averages is a good place to start looking.
The Rate of Change (ROC) indicator is a very simple yet effective oscillator that
measures the percent change in price from one period to the next. The ROC calculation
compares the current price with the price n periods ago.
30
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
The plot forms an oscillator that fluctuates above and below the zero line as the Rate of
Change moves from positive to negative. The oscillator can be used as any other
momentum oscillator by looking for higher lows, lower highs, positive and negative
divergences, and crosses above and below zero for signals.
ROC can be plotted using different periods such as 10 days or 30 days by changing the
value. The longer the time span used, the greater the fluctuation in the indicator (in terms
of both magnitude and duration).
There is another popular indicator called "Momentum" that is almost identical to the Rate
of Change indicator. The only difference is that the Rate of Change indicator adds 100 to
the ROC's value. Momentum also uses 100 as its center line instead of zero like the
ROC. Because both indicators give identical signals, StockCharts.com has choosen to
only implement the Rate of Change version. People that are used to using the
Momentum indicator can simply replace that with the ROC indicator on their charts.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is an extremely useful and popular momentum
oscillator. The RSI compares the magnitude of a stock's recent gains to the magnitude of
its recent losses and turns that information into a number that ranges from 0 to 100. It
takes a single parameter, the number of time periods to use in the calculation.
Calculation:
31
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
To simplify the formula, the RSI has been broken down into its basic components which
are the Average Gain, the Average Loss, the First RS, and the subsequent Smoothed
RS's.
For a 20 -period RSI, the Average Gain equals the sum total all gains divided by 20. Even
if there are only 5 gains (losses), the total of those 5 gains (losses) is divided by the total
number of RSI periods in the calculation (20 in this case). The Average Loss is computed
in a similar manner.
Calculation of the First RS value is straightforward: divide the Average Gain by the
Average Loss. All subsequent RS calculations use the previous period's Average Gain
and Average Loss for smoothing purposes. See the "Smoothed RS" formula above for
details. The table below illustrates the formula in action.
Closing Relative
Date price Gain loss Avg.gain Avg.loss Strenght RSI
31-Dec-03 1879.75
1-Jan-04 1912.25 32.5
2-Jan-04 1946.05 33.8
5-Jan-04 1955 8.95
6-Jan-04 1926.7 28.3
7-Jan-04 1916.75 9.95
8-Jan-04 1968.55 51.8 0
9-Jan-04 1971.9 3.35 0
12-Jan-04 1945.6 26.3
13-Jan-04 1963.6 18 0
14-Jan-04 1982.15 18.55 0
15-Jan-04 1944.45 37.7
16-Jan-04 1900.65 43.8
19-Jan-04 1935.35 34.7 0
20-Jan-04 1893.25 42.1
21-Jan-04 1824.6 68.65
22-Jan-04 1770.5 54.1
32
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
The momentum
The momentum is certainly the easiest one to compute. The momentum is the difference
between today's price and the one of n days before.
With:
Pt today's price.
Pt-n the price at the date t-n
MOt = Pt - Pt-n
33
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
The most often used are 5, 10, 20, 25 and 28 days. Here 20 days momentum is used to
find out the short term appliance of the momentum.
34
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
CHAPTER – 4
ANALYIS OF DATA
AND
INTERPRETATION
35
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
Closing 20 days
Date price DMA
31-Dec-04 2059.85
3-Jan-05 2080
4-Jan-05 2100.55
5-Jan-05 1990.15
6-Jan-05 1984.25
7-Jan-05 1992.55
10-Jan-05 1974.8
11-Jan-05 1947.35
12-Jan-05 1900.85
13-Jan-05 1916.95
14-Jan-05 1922.85
17-Jan-05 1902.45
18-Jan-05 1925.35
19-Jan-05 1922.35
20-Jan-05 1900.05
24-Jan-05 1902.9
25-Jan-05 1894.4
27-Jan-05 1929
28-Jan-05 1950.85
31-Jan-05 2006.35 1960.1925
1-Feb-05 2045.25 1959.4625
2-Feb-05 2045.5 1957.7375
3-Feb-05 2052.35 1955.3275
4-Feb-05 2060.8 1958.86
7-Feb-05 2049.85 1962.14
8-Feb-05 2043.6 1964.6925
9-Feb-05 2055.2 1968.7125
10-Feb-05 2049.85 1973.8375
11-Feb-05 2063.35 1981.9625
14-Feb-05 2083.05 1990.2675
15-Feb-05 2081.2 1998.185
16-Feb-05 2059.45 2006.035
17-Feb-05 2045.85 2012.06
18-Feb-05 2048.85 2018.385
21-Feb-05 2039.9 2025.3775
22-Feb-05 2036.6 2032.0625
23-Feb-05 2051.35 2039.91
24-Feb-05 2052.4 2046.08
25-Feb-05 2051.2 2051.0975
28-Feb-05 2047.7 2053.165
1-Mar-05 2073.8 2054.5925
2-Mar-05 2080.55 2056.345
36
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
37
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
38
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
39
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
40
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
41
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
Closing
Date price Momentum
31-Dec-04 2059.85
3-Jan-05 2080
4-Jan-05 2100.55
5-Jan-05 1990.15
6-Jan-05 1984.25
7-Jan-05 1992.55
10-Jan-05 1974.8
11-Jan-05 1947.35
12-Jan-05 1900.85
13-Jan-05 1916.95
14-Jan-05 1922.85
17-Jan-05 1902.45
18-Jan-05 1925.35
19-Jan-05 1922.35
20-Jan-05 1900.05
24-Jan-05 1902.9
25-Jan-05 1894.4
27-Jan-05 1929
28-Jan-05 1950.85
31-Jan-05 2006.35
1-Feb-05 2045.25 -14.6
2-Feb-05 2045.5 -34.5
3-Feb-05 2052.35 -48.2
4-Feb-05 2060.8 70.65
7-Feb-05 2049.85 65.6
8-Feb-05 2043.6 51.05
9-Feb-05 2055.2 80.4
10-Feb-05 2049.85 102.5
11-Feb-05 2063.35 162.5
14-Feb-05 2083.05 166.1
15-Feb-05 2081.2 158.35
16-Feb-05 2059.45 157
17-Feb-05 2045.85 120.5
18-Feb-05 2048.85 126.5
21-Feb-05 2039.9 139.85
22-Feb-05 2036.6 133.7
23-Feb-05 2051.35 156.95
24-Feb-05 2052.4 123.4
25-Feb-05 2051.2 100.35
28-Feb-05 2047.7 41.35
1-Mar-05 2073.8 28.55
2-Mar-05 2080.55 35.05
3-Mar-05 2093.35 41
42
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
43
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
44
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
45
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
46
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
47
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
48
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
49
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
50
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
51
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
52
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
53
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
54
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
55
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
56
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
57
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
58
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
59
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
The entire monthly vice charts formed for Nifty index closing price 2005
2150
2100
2050
PRICE
1900
1850
1800
05
5
00
00
00
00
20
/2
/2
/2
/2
3/
10
17
24
31
1/
1/
1/
1/
1/
PERIOD
DMA IN FEBRUARY
2120
2100
2080
2060
2040
PRICE
05
5
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
2/
2/
2/
2/
PERIOD
60
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
DMA OF MARCH
2200
2150
2100
ACTUAL CLOSING
PRICE
2050 PRICE
2000 DMA
1950
1900
1850
3/1/2005
3/8/2005
3/15/2005
3/22/2005
3/29/2005
PERIOD
DMA OF APRIL
2150
2100
2050
PRICE
1900
1850
1800
5
5
5
00
00
00
00
00
/2
/2
/2
2
2
1/
8/
15
22
29
4/
4/
4/
4/
4/
PERIOD
61
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
DMA OF MAY
2150
2100
2050
PRICE
1900
1850
1800
5/2/2005
5/9/2005
5/16/2005
5/23/2005
5/30/2005
PERIOD
DMA OF JUNE
2250
2200
2150
PRICE
2000
1950
1900
6/1/2005
6/8/2005
6/15/2005
6/22/2005
6/29/2005
PEROID
62
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
DMA OF JULY
2350
2300
2250
PRICE
ACTUAL CLOSING
2200
DMA
2150
2100
2050
7/1/2005
7/8/2005
7/15/2005
7/22/2005
PERIOD 7/29/2005
DMA OF AUG
2450
2400
2350
PRICE
ACTUAL CLOSING
2300
DMA
2250
2200
2150
8/1/2005
8/8/2005
8/15/2005
8/22/2005
8/29/2005
PERIOD
63
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
DMA OF SEPT
2650
2600
2550
2500
PRICE
5
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
9/
9/
9/
9/
9/
PERIOD
DMA OF OCT
2700
2600
2500
PRICE
ACTTUAL CLOSING
2400
DMA
2300
2200
2100
10/10/2005
10/17/2005
10/24/2005
10/31/2005
10/3/2005
PERIOD
64
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
DMA OF NOV
2800
2700
2600
PRICE
ACTUAL CLOSING
2500
DMA
2400
2300
2200
11/1/2005
11/8/2005
11/15/2005
11/22/2005
PERIOD 11/29/2005
DMA OF DEC
2900
2850
2800
2750
PRICE
12/8/2005
12/15/2005
12/22/2005
12/29/2005
PERIOD
65
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
MOMENTUM OF JAN
2500
2000
1500
PRICE
MOMENTUM
1000 CLOSING
500
0
05
5
5
04
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
7/
1/
14
21
28
1/
/3
1/
1/
1/
12
PERIOD
MOMENTUM OF FEB
2300
2250
2200
2150
PRICE
2/8/2005
2/15/2005
2/22/2005
PERIOD
66
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
MOMENTUM OF MARCH
2500
2000
1500
PRICE
MOMENTUM
CLOSING
1000
500
5
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
3/
3/
3/
3/
3/
PERIOD
MOMENTUM OF APRIL
2500
2000
1500
PRICE
MOMENTUM
CLOSING
1000
500
0
5
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
29
22
4/
4/
4/
4/
4/
PERIOD
67
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
MOENTUM OF MAY
2500
2000
1500
PRICE
MOMENTUM
CLOSING
1000
500
0
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
2/
9/
16
23
30
5/
5/
5/
5/
5/
PERIOD
MOMENTUM OF JUNE
2400
2350
2300
2250
2200
PRICE
MOMENTUM
2150
CLOSING
2100
2050
2000
1950
1900
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
6/
6/
6/
6/
6/
PERIOD
68
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
MOMENTUM OF JULY
2450
2400
2350
2300
PRICE
MOMENTUM
2250
CLOSING
2200
2150
2100
2050
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
PERIOD
MOMENTUM OF AUG
2600
2550
2500
2450
PRICE
2400 MOMENTUM
2350 CLOSING
2300
2250
2200
2150
8/1/2005
8/8/2005
8/15/2005
8/22/2005
8/29/2005
PERIOD
69
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
MOMENTUM OF SEPT
2900
2800
2700
2600
PRICE
MOMENTUM
2500
CLOSING
2400
2300
2200
2100
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
9/
9/
9/
9/
9/
PERIOD
MOMENTUM OF OCT
3500
3000
2500
PRICE
2000 MOMENTUM
1500 CLOSING
1000
500
0
5
05
05
05
05
00
20
20
20
20
/2
0/
7/
4/
1/
/3
/1
/1
/2
/3
10
10
10
10
10
PERIOD
70
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
MOMENTUM OF NOV
3500
3000
2500
PRICE
2000 MOMENTUM
1500 CLOSING
1000
500
0
5
05
05
05
00
00
20
20
20
/2
/2
5/
2/
9/
/1
/8
/1
/2
/2
11
11
11
11
11
PERIOD
MOMENTUM OF DEC
3200
3100
3000
2900
PRICE
MOMENTUM
2800
CLOSING
2700
2600
2500
2400
5
05
05
05
00
00
20
20
20
/2
/2
5/
9/
2/
/1
/8
/1
/2
/2
12
12
12
12
12
PERIOD
71
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
80
70
60
50
PRICE
40 Series1
30
20
10
0
05
5
04
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
7/
1/
14
21
28
1/
/3
1/
1/
1/
12
PERIOD
RSI OF FEB
90
80
70
60
PRICE
50
Series1
40
30
20
10
0
5
5
05
05
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
2/
2/
2/
2/
PERIOD
72
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
RSI OF MARCH
80
70
60
50
PRICE
40 Series1
30
20
10
0
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
3/
3/
3/
3/
3/
PERIOD
RSI OF APRIL
50
45
40
35
30
PRICE
25 Series1
20
15
10
5
0
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
4/
4/
4/
4/
4/
PERIOD
73
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
RSI OF MAY
90
80
70
60
PRICE
50
Series1
40
30
20
10
0
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
2/
9/
16
23
30
5/
5/
5/
5/
5/
PERIOD
RSI OF JUNE
80
78
76
74
72
PRICE
70
Series1
68
66
64
62
60
58
5
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
6/
6/
6/
6/
6/
PERIOD
74
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
RSI OF JULY
80
70
60
50
PRICE
40 Series1
30
20
10
0
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
PERIOD
RSI OF AUG
90
80
70
60
PRICE
50
Series1
40
30
20
10
0
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
PERIOD
75
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
RSI OF SEPT
100
90
80
70
60
PRICE
50 Series1
40
30
20
10
0
5
5
05
05
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
9/
9/
9/
9/
PERIOD 9/
RSI OF OCT
80
70
60
50
PRICE
40 Series1
30
20
10
0
5
05
05
05
05
00
20
20
20
20
/2
1/
0/
7/
4/
/3
/2
/3
/1
/1
10
10
10
10
10
PERIOD
76
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
RSI OF NOV
100
90
80
70
60
PRICE
50 Series1
40
30
20
10
0
05
05
05
5
5
00
00
20
20
20
/2
/2
9/
5/
2/
/1
/8
/1
/2
/2
11
11
11
11
11
PERIOD
RSI OF DEC
90
80
70
60
PRICE
50
Series1
40
30
20
10
0
05
05
05
5
5
00
00
20
20
20
/2
/2
5/
2/
9/
/1
/8
/1
/2
/2
12
12
12
12
12
PERIOD
77
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
ROC OF JAN
8
6
4
2
PRICE
0
Series1
05
5
-2
00
00
00
00
20
/2
/2
/2
/2
3/
10
17
24
31
-4
1/
1/
1/
1/
1/
-6
-8
-10
PERIOD
ROC OF FEB
10
4
PRICE
Series1
2
0
05
05
5
00
00
-2
20
20
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
2/
2/
2/
2/
-4
PERIOD
78
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
ROC OF MARCH
2
PRICE
0 Series1
05
05
5
00
00
00
20
20
-2
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
3/
3/
3/
3/
3/
-4
-6
PERIOD
ROC OF APRIL
0
-1
05
05
5
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
-2
15
22
29
4/
4/
4/
4/
4/
-3
-4
PRICE
-5 Series1
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10
PERIOD
79
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
ROC OF MAY
10
8
6
4
PRICE
2
Series1
0
05
05
-2 5
5
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
2/
9/
16
23
30
-4
5/
5/
5/
5/
5/
-6
-8
PERIOD
ROC OF JUNE
8
7
6
5
PRICE
4 Series1
3
2
1
0
05
05
5
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
6/
6/
6/
6/
6/
PERIOD
80
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
ROC OF JULY
5
PRICE
4
Series1
3
0
05
05
5
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
PERIOD
ROC OF AUG
10
9
8
7
6
PRICE
5 Series1
4
3
2
1
0
05
05
5
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
8/
8/
8/
8/
8/
PERIOD
81
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
ROC OF SEPT.
12
10
8
PRICE
6 Series1
0
05
05
5
00
00
00
20
20
/2
/2
/2
1/
8/
15
22
29
9/
9/
9/
9/
9/
PERIOD
ROC OF OCT
15
10
5
PRICE
0 Series1
05
05
05
05
5
00
20
20
20
20
/2
0/
7/
4/
1/
-5
/3
/1
/1
/2
/3
10
10
10
10
10
-10
-15
PERIOD
82
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
ROC OF NOV
20
15
10
5
PRICE
Series1
0 05
05
05
5
5
00
00
-5
20
20
20
/2
/2
5/
2/
9/
/1
/8
/1
/2
/2
11
11
11
11
11
-10
-15
PERIOD
ROC OF DEC
14
12
10
PRICE
8
Series1
6
4
2
0
5
05
05
05
00
00
20
20
20
/2
/2
5/
2/
9/
/1
/8
/1
/2
/2
12
12
12
12
12
PERIOD
83
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
It is evident from the plotted graphs that trends in a stock prices can be very volatile. One
technique for dealing with volatile stock price is day moving average. It is constructed by
totaling a set of data and dividing the sum by the number of observation. Here in this
study 20 day moving average is constructed for the Nifty index price of 2005. The actual
closing price and the calculated DMA are plotted in the same graph monthly vice basis. A
rising DMA indicates market strength and a declining one denotes weakness. Changes in
the price trend are identified by the price itself crossing its day moving average.
84
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
The most popular method of interpreting a daily moving average is to compare the
relationship between a daily moving average of the security's closing price and the
security's closing price itself. A sell signal is generated when the security's price falls
below its daily moving average and a buy signal is generated when the security's price
rises above its moving average. This type of daily moving average trading system is not
intended to get in at the exact bottom and out at the exact top. Rather, it is designed to
keep in line with the security's price trend by buying shortly after the security's price
bottoms and selling shortly after it tops.
The critical element in a daily moving average is the number of time periods used in
calculating the average. When using hindsight, we can always find a moving average
that would have been profitable. The key is to find a moving average that will be
consistently profitable. Here I used 20-day moving average to find out the significance of
moving average in short term trading.
A change from a rising trend to declining price is signaled when the price moves
below its day moving average. A bullish signal is given when the price goes above the
DMA. The technicians gets the sell signal at the point where declining DMA crossover
the price line. Traders will buy the share at the point where rising trend crosses the actual
price line. The buy and sell signals generated by seeing the related graph in this study.
Day moving average exhibited sell signal in January, March, April, May, October and
November in the year 2005 (Nifty Index). It has given buy signals in the months of
February, June, July, August, September and the December.
RATE OF CHANGE
The Rate of Change indicator (ROC) is a way of showing how rapidly the price of a
particular share (or other financial instrument) is moving. The theory is that if a price is
rising (or falling) very quickly there will soon come a time when it is thought to be
85
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
overbought (or oversold). When this occurs the price may still continue to rise (or fall),
but not as rapidly as it was before.
This oscillator always has a value between 0 and 10. And is calculated from the average
of all price rises in a given period divided by the average of all price falls in the same
period. Again the choice of period is arbitrary and dependent on your position in the
markets.
The major use of this oscillator is to identify the overbought and oversold zones. To
identify the overbought zone, look at the historic high values on the ROC chart for the
scrip that is been studied. If one finds that the current value is in the peak of the historic
high values, the scrip can be said to have entered the overbought zone. On the same
count, if the ROC touches the historic low values, the scrip can be said to have entered
the oversold zone. The Rate of change indicator is not necessarily same with the other
indicators. It has given 7 time sell signal and only 5 time buy signal for the nifty index
price 2005. This is because of different parameters are used for construction ROC.
A popular method of analyzing the RSI is to look for a divergence in which the market
index is making a new high, but the RSI is failing to surpass its previous high. This
divergence would be an indication of an impending reversal. When the RSI then turns
down and falls below its most recent trough, it is said to have completed a failure swing.
The failure swing would be considered a confirmation of an impending reversal.
If the RSI goes above 70 the shares are overbought, and you should consider selling at
that price level. If the RSI goes below 30 the shares are oversold, and you should be
looking for buying opportunities. The neutral position of this oscillator is at 50; if it rises
above 50, the instrument is becoming overbought, if it falls below it is becoming
oversold. Critical levels exist at 75 and 25. An ROC above or below these levels indicates
the instrument is overbought or oversold. It has given 5 times buy signals and 7 times sell
signals in year.
86
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
The Momentum
The Momentum indicator measures the amount that a security's price has changed over a
given time span.
Interpretation:
There are basically two ways to use the Momentum indicator: You can use the
Momentum indicator as a trend-following oscillator similar to the MACD. Buy when the
indicator bottoms and turns up and sell when the indicator peaks and turns down(this is
the method I prefer in this study).
If the Momentum indicator reaches extremely high or low values (relative to its
historical values), you should assume a continuation of the current trend. For example, if
the Momentum indicator reaches extremely high values and then turns down, you should
assume prices will probably go still higher. In either case, only trade after prices confirm
the signal generated by the indicator (e.g., if prices peak and turn down, wait for prices to
begin to fall before selling).
We can also use the Momentum indicator as a leading indicator. This method assumes
that market tops are typically identified by a rapid price increase (when everyone expects
prices to go higher) and that market bottoms typically end with rapid price declines
(when everyone wants to get out). As a market peaks, the Momentum indicator will climb
sharply and then fall off- diverging from the continued upward or sideways movement of
the price. Similarly, at a market bottom, Momentum will drop sharply and then begin to
climb well ahead of prices. Both of these situations result in divergences between the
indicator and prices. It has given both buy and sell signals 6 times each in year.
87
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
CHAPTER – 5
SUMMARY
AND
CONCLUSION
88
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
Summary
In this study, I have made 48 predictions in year. All tools are tested monthly vice for the
nifty index closing price 2005. The price movement plotted on the graph for calculated
data made the predictions. Relevance of the share price are tested by comparing the
actual price and signals of the graphs. Totally 26 predictions of the graphs were able to
make right decision and helped to investors to profitable trade. 24 predictions of the
graphs were false. They did not fetch the profit to the traders. Therefore, we can say
technical analysis is worked here to the extent of 54%.
FINDINGS
WHICH IS BETTER?
The result of this study shows that day moving average is the best tool to pick up the
stock. The day moving average prediction in the year 2005 for nifty index price is more
efficient compare to other tools. 9 out of 12 time the day moving average has given right
prediction. The traders who invested in the share according to the day moving average
trend were able to make maximum profit.
The Momentum also proven to be satisfactory to the traders in case of nifty index price
2005. It has given 7 times right prediction out of 12. Other tools which I have used in this
study are Relative strength index and Rate of change method. Both were given only 5
89
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
times right prediction. The investors who made their investment according to these
predictions have occurred a loss. It may not be 100% true, because the tools and the
software used in the chart here are not very advanced one as traders use in their analysis.
However, the day moving average is the one tool which is very simple to construct the
graph and more reliable to the regular traders.
Which technical analysis tool we use will depend on your trading and investing style and
preferences. The day moving average obviously has a lag, but the other tools which are
used here also be prone to quicker breaks. Some traders prefer to use Relative Strength
Index for shorter time periods to capture changes quicker. Some investors prefer simple
moving averages over long time periods to identify long-term trend changes. In addition,
much will depend on the individual security in question. The technical chart type and
length of time will depend greatly on the individual security and how it has reacted in the
past.
The initial thought for some is that greater sensitivity and quicker signals are bound to be
beneficial. This is not always true and brings up a great dilemma for the technical analyst:
the trade off between sensitivity and reliability. The more sensitive an indicator is, the
more signals that will be given. These signals may prove timely, but with increased
sensitivity comes an increase in false signals. The less sensitive an indicator is, the fewer
signals that will be given. However, less sensitivity leads to fewer and more reliable
signals. Sometimes these signals can be late as well.
CONCLUSION
Technical analysis can offer great insight, but if used improperly, they can also produce
false signals. While trend lines have become a very popular aspect of technical analysis,
they are merely one tool for establishing, analyzing, and confirming a trend. Trend lines
should not be the final arbiter, but should serve merely as a warning that a change in
trend may be very useful.
The price set by the market reflects the sum knowledge of all participants, and we
are not dealing with lightweights here. These participants have considered (discounted)
90
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
everything under the sun and settled on a price to buy or sell. These are the forces of
supply and demand at work. By examining price action to determine which force is
prevailing, technical analysis focuses directly on the bottom line: What is the price?
Where has it been? Where is it going?
Even though there are some universal principles and rules that can be applied, it
must be remembered that technical analysis is more an art form than a science. As an art
form, it is subject to interpretation. However, it is also flexible in its approach and each
investor should use only that which suits his or her style. Developing a style takes time,
effort and dedication, but the rewards can be significant
91
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
GLOSSARY
The Random Walk Hypothesis: the hypothesis claims that stock price moments either
independent or uncorrelated increments.
The Rate of Change: The Rate of Change indicator (ROC) is a way of showing how
rapidly the price of a particular share (or other financial instrument) is moving.
Market-based valuation: valuing a stock is not only to estimate its fair value, but also to
determine its potential price range, taking into account market behavior aspects.
Momentum: The Momentum indicator measures the amount that a security's price has
changed over a given time span.
Moving Average: is an indicator that shows the average value of a security's price over a
period of time.
Value investing: the strategy of selecting stocks that trade for less than their intrinsic
value.
92
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
BIBLIOGRAPHY
TEXT BOOKS:
ARTICLES:
93
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Technical Analysis
Websites:
1. www.nseindia.com
2. www.google.com
3. www.investopedia.com.
5. www.valuepro.net.
6. www.myiris.com.
7. www.Valuenotes.com.
94
M. P. BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT