Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This pamphlet has been prepared by the Sydney Atheists Meet-Up Group - http://atheists.meetup.com/524/ - July 2008
Suffering is good
“We suffer from ill-health, from pains, headaches, rheumatism, arthritis, from accidents, from enemies. We
may have financial difficulties. Some suffer for weeks in their homes, some in hospitals or nursing homes.
In a word, we are in a vale of tears. Almighty God could have saved us from all suffering, but He did not
do so because He knows in His infinite goodness that suffering is good for us.”
Father Paul O’Sullivan. http://www.catholic-pages.com/life/suffering.asp
War is good
“War has a supernatural end that the world is unaware of…In the end we will have to love it as the
religious should love his disciples.” Jose Maria Escriva De Balaguer, Opus Dei Founder.
http://www.escrivaworks.org/book/the_way-point-311.htm
Cruelty is good
“But if you do not give ear to me, and do not keep all these my laws. And if you go against my rules and if
you have hate in your souls for my decisions and you do not do all my orders, but go against my
agreement. This will I do to you: I will put fear in your hearts, even wasting disease and burning pain,
drying up the eyes and making the soul feeble, and you will get no profit from your seed, for your haters
will take it for food. And my face will be turned from you, and you will be broken before those who are
against you, and your haters will become your rulers, and you will go in flight when no man comes after
you. …And the pride of your strength will be broken, and I will make your heaven as iron and your earth
as brass. And your strength will be used up without profit; for your land will not give her increase and the
trees of the field will not give their fruit… I will let loose the beasts of the field among you, and they will
take away your children and send destruction on your cattle, so that your numbers will become small and
your roads become waste… And I will send a sword on you to give effect to the punishment of my
agreement; and when you come together into your towns I will send disease among you and you will be
given up into the hands of your haters. When I take away your bread of life, ten women will be cooking
bread in one oven, and your bread will be measured out by weight; you will have food but never enough…
Then you will take the flesh of your sons and the flesh of your daughters for food. “
Leviticus 26:14-29
Bestialism is good
“And Jacob fled into the country of Syria, and Israel served for a wife, and for a wife he kept sheep.”
Hosea 12:12
"Do not keep back training from the child: for even if you give him blows with the rod, it will not be death
to him. Give him blows with the rod, and keep his soul safe from the underworld."
Proverbs 23:13-14
“No man whose private parts have been wounded or cut off may come into the meeting of the Lord's
people.”
Deuteronomy 23:1
Jesus had a mild psychotic episode [distorted sense of objective reality by blaming an innocent tree]
“Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered. And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he
came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee
henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away. And when the disciples saw it, they
marvelled, saying, How soon is the fig tree withered away!”
Matthew 21:18-20
Accusing of heresy was very profitable
“Innocent IV in the bull Ad Exstirpanda conceded to the State a portion of the property to be confiscated
[from heretics]; and the State in return assumed the odium and burden of inflicting the penalty, even to
capital execution, if need were.”
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc06/Page_2.html
“The burning of heretics was first decreed in the eleventh century. The Synod of Verona (1184) imposed
on bishops the duty to search out the heretics in their dioceses and to hand them over to the secular power.
Everyone was bound to denounce heretics, the names of the witnesses were kept secret. After 1243, when
Innocent IV sanctioned the laws of Emperor Frederick II and of Louis IX against heretics, torture was
applied in trials; the guilty persons were delivered up to the civil authorities and actually burnt at the
stake.”
http://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/CEHERESY.TXT
“The confiscation of the property of convicted heretics had already been introduced by the medieval
Inquisition. In 1199 Pope Innocent III issued the Bull Vergentis in Senium, which for the first time
identified heresy with the offense of treason in Roman Law, to incur the same punishments. This meant
that, just as persons guilty of treason suffered confiscation of all their property, so also were the goods of
heretics liable to confiscation. In 1252, Pope Innocent IV decreed that the property of heretics should be
divided between the secular authority, the officials of the Inquisition, and the Bishop. It later became the
established norm to divide the property into three parts: a third went to the secular authority, a third to the
Inquisition, and a third to the Pope.”
“The Former Jews of this Kingdom”, 2003, p. 163, by Nadia Zeldes - PhD in Jewish History - Tel Aviv University
Poo-poo is yummy
“And let your food be barley cakes, cooking it before their eyes with the waste which comes out of a man.”
Ezekiel 4:12
In 2001 Cardinal Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) states that 1962 instructions are still in force
“Lawyers point to a letter the Vatican sent to bishops in May 2001 clearly stating the 1962 instruction was
in force until then. The letter is signed by Cardinal Ratzinger, the most powerful man in Rome beside the
Pope and who heads the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which ran the Inquisition in the Middle
Ages.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/aug/17/religion.childprotection
Major Settlements and monetary awards in civil suits in the United States
“Total settlements and awards from 1950-present would appear to be over US$3 billion, not including
treatment costs and legal fees….Our table shows payouts to 3,514 survivors, only about 27% of the over
13,000 survivors who the bishops say have come forward….The total number of victims maybe 100,000.”
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/settlements/
His Holiness the Dalai Lama (spiritual leader of Buddhism, born 1935)
“Whether you believe in God or not does not matter so much, whether you believe in Buddha or not does
not matter so much. You must lead a good life.”
Photo: In Africa, billboards urging condom use have been replaced by posters urging youth to delay their
sexual debut until they marry.
The man just chosen to head South Africa’s leading political party, Jacob Zuma, had rape charges
dismissed last year. But he did admit having unprotected sex with the woman involved, though he knew
she had HIV. According to Zuma, the woman indicated “she wanted sex” by wearing a skirt and he
protected himself by showering. The incident reflects the difficulty of controlling the disease in sub-
Saharan Africa, where sexual violence runs rampant, and multiple partners are the norm. It also indicates
the all-too-common unscientific views held in the region about the spread of HIV/AIDS.
For years, health groups tried to educate people throughout sub-Saharan Africa about the role of condoms
for protection. Now, a controversial U.S. debate over prevention methods has spilled into Africa, pitting
social conservatives who seek to promote abstinence against many health experts who say condoms
combined with education is best. In 2003, the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)
pledged $15 billion over five years focusing on fifteen nations, most of them in Africa. The money comes
with conditions: A third of funds must go to abstinence and monogamy education; promotion of condom
use is restricted to “high-risk” adults; and the groups receiving funding must vow to end prostitution. With
the program up for renewal by Congress in 2008, a number of health advocates hope to remove these
restrictions.
However, a 2007 report published by the U.S. National Academies of Sciences says a lack of information
makes it difficult to evaluate the efficacy of the abstinence programs. Also, for some women in the
developing world, abstinence is not up to them. Some turn to sex for survival, and others are coerced into
sex or raped, even in marriage, reports U.S.-based government watchdog the Center for Public Integrity. In
attempts to debunk abstinence-until-marriage arguments, some critics point to statistics that show
infections rising in married women, sometimes at a greater rate than infections of sexually active single
women. Laurie Garrett, a global health expert, said designing foreign policy “to stamp out sexual activity
among consenting adults is a fool’s errand.”
1
Extracts from “The Challenge of Preventing AIDS”, by Tony Johnson, published in “Council on Foreign Relations”
magazine, on December 28, 2007.
Time to Grow Up: “Abstinence only” education does not slow the spread of AIDS
Sep 20th 2007
From “The Economist” print edition
THERE can be no surer way of averting a sexually transmitted infection such as AIDS than avoiding sex.
That much is obvious. And it is also convenient for religious lobbyists who believe that premarital sex is a
sin. But is it realistic? Those lobbyists argue that a popular alternative—known in the jargon as
“abstinence-plus”—which recommends chastity but also explains how to use condoms, is likely to make
things worse by encouraging earlier intercourse. “Abstinence-only” teaching, they reckon, should be more
effective. That, of course, is a possibility. But it is a testable possibility. And Kristen Underhill and her
colleagues at the University of Oxford have, over the past few months, been testing it. Their conclusion is
that it is wrong. Abstinence-only does not work. Abstinence-plus probably does.
Last month Dr Underhill published a review of 13 trials involving 16,000 young people in America. The
trials compared the sexual behaviour of those given an abstinence-only education with that of those who
were provided with no information at all or with whatever their schools normally taught. Pregnancies were
as numerous in both groups. Sexually transmitted diseases were as widespread. The number of sexual
partners was equally high and unprotected sex just as common. Having thus discredited abstinence-only
teaching, Dr Underhill and her colleagues decided to evaluate the slightly more complicated message of
“abstinence-plus” using 39 trials that involved 38,000-odd young people from the United States, Canada
and the Bahamas. Their results are published in the current issue of Public Library of Science Medicine.
This tuition—compared, as before, with whatever biology classes and playgrounds provide—reduced the
number of pregnancies in three out of seven trials (the remaining four recorded no difference). Four out of
13 trials found that abstinence-plus-educated teenagers had fewer sexual partners, while the remainder
showed no change. Fourteen studies reported that it increased condom use; 12 others reported no
difference. Furthermore, in the vast majority of cases, abstinence-plus participants knew more about AIDS
and HIV (the virus that causes the disease) than their peers did. And the tuition often reduced the frequency
of anal sex (which brings a greater chance of passing on HIV than the vaginal option). In contrast to the
fears of the protagonists of abstinence-only education, not one of the trials found that teenagers behaved in
a riskier fashion in either the long or the short term after receiving abstinence-plus instruction.
Unfortunately (and surprisingly) only two of the studies addressed the question of disease transmission
directly, and the numbers involved were too small to find a statistically significant difference between
groups. Nevertheless, Dr Underhill's pair of reviews should make informative reading for policymakers.
America's government earmarks money for abstinence-only teaching, which is matched by individual
states. It should review that policy—which is clearly no better than the alternatives, and is probably worse.
Its generosity to needy foreigners is similarly prescriptive. Of the $15 billion promised over five years by
PEPFAR (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), President George Bush's personal anti-AIDS
initiative, $1 billion is reserved for groups that intend to fight AIDS without mentioning condoms. Though
Dr Underhill's results apply only to North America, they do suggest a need to investigate what happens
elsewhere, in case PEPFAR's policy, too, needs to be reviewed.
Catholic Church Apologies
The Catholic Church on its past support for slavery
• August 9, 1993: Pope John Paul II apologizes for Catholic involvement with the African slave trade.
• March 12, 2000: Pope John Paul II asks forgiveness for the sins of Catholics throughout the ages.
During a public Mass of Pardon, the Pope says that "Christians...have violated the rights of ethnic
groups and peoples, and shown contempt for their cultures and religious traditions..."