You are on page 1of 4

A case study of multi-layered wind structure over Tokyo associated with sea

breeze circulation by use of a coherent Doppler lidar and the WRF model
Nobumitsu Tsunematsu, Hironori Iwai, Shoken Ishii, Yasuhiro Murayama,
Motoaki Yasui, Kohei Mizutani, Seiji Kawamura, Yuichi Ohno
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
4-2-1 Nukui-kita, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8795, JAPAN
n.tsunematsu@nict.go.jp

INTRODUCTION at 5 km. The number of vertical layers was set at 31.


In the Kanto Plain, a steady sea breeze originating The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data (Kalnay et al.,
from the Pacific coast frequently prevails under the 1996) was used for the initial and boundary conditions.
cloudless weak synoptic wind condition. This sea
breeze is called the extended sea breeze because its LIDAR OBSERVATION RESULTS
horizontal scale exceeds 100 km (Kondo, 1990). The Figure 2 shows results of the Doppler lidar
extended sea breeze can transport atmospheric constant-azimuth-angle radial wind velocity scans at
pollutants to the inland area (Kurita et al., 1990). The 1600 local standard time (LST) 10 August 2006. The
sea breeze is, therefore, familiar to people living in negative velocities at altitudes below 1 km above
the Kanto Plain including the Tokyo metropolitan mean sea level (MSL) and the positive velocities at
area. To investigate horizontal and vertical wind altitudes of 1–2 km MSL formed a distinct vertical
fields associated with the sea breeze circulation, this wind shear. This wind structure appeared in the
study performed ground-based coherent Doppler afternoon and persisted until the evening. The cause
lidar observations on 10 August 2006 at the National of this structure is investigated in the present study.
Institute of Information and Communications
Technology (NICT), located in the metropolitan area. METEOROLOGICAL CONDITION
The north Pacific anticyclone covered the Japanese
DOPPLER LIDAR SYSTEM island on 10 August 2006, resulting in a weak
The NICT coherent Doppler lidar consists of a pressure gradient and weak synoptic wind condition
transceiver system manufactured by CTI, a two-axis (Figure 3). This synoptic condition was favorable to
mirror scanning system, and a data acquisition system the development of local wind circulations in Japan.
(Ishii et al., 2005). Figure 1 shows a photograph of Figure 4 shows the 4-hourly surface wind fields
the lidar. The Tm:YAG laser pulse is transmitted into around the Kanto Plain on the daytime of 10 August
the atmosphere at a 2 μm wavelength through a
8-cm-effective-diameter telescope and a scanning
device. The backscattered signals that are Doppler-
shifted by moving aerosol particles are digitized by 8
bit A/D converters. In this observation, the constant-
azimuth-angle radial wind velocity scans at an
azimuth angle of 213° and elevation angles of 4–90°
were carried out, in addition to the Doppler Beam
Swing (DBS) scans at an elevation angle of 80°.

NUMERICAL MODEL
Numerical experiments by use of the Weather
Research and Forecasting (WRF) model (Skamarock
et al., 2005) were conducted for reproduction of the Figure 1. Photograph of the Doppler lidar system.
local winds. The interval of horizontal grids was set
Figure 2. Results of the Doppler lidar constant-azimuth-angle radial wind velocity scans at 1600 LST 10 August
2006. The axes of X and Y indicate horizontal distance from the lidar (km) and above mean sea level
(km), respectively. The solid contour lines show the radial wind velocities at intervals of 1 m/s. The dense
shading represents airflow away from the lidar. Airflow toward the lidar is represented by the thin shading.
The barbs and pennants in the right side show a vertical profile of horizontal winds above the lidar at the
same time, observed by DBS. Each barb and pennant indicates the velocity of 1 m/s and 5m/s,
respectively.

SIMULATED WIND FIELDS


Figure 5 shows the simulated surface wind field
and the horizontal divergences in the Kanto Plain at
1230 LST 10 August 2006. A convergence zone
between the southwesterly sea breeze originating
from Sagami Bay and the sea breeze originating
from Tokyo Bay and fronts of those sea breezes can
be recognized. An image by the MoDerate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) of the satellite
AQUA (figures not shown here) shows that cumulus
clouds were formed along both the surface wind
convergence zone and the sea breeze fronts.
Figure 6 shows a vertical cross section of the
simulated winds along 139.5°E at 1600LST 10
aFigure 3. Surface weather chart around Japan at August 2006. The front of the sea breeze originating
a0900 LST 10 August 2006. from Sagami Bay toward the inland area passed the
Doppler lidar observation site in the afternoon. Both
2006, which were obtained from the Automated the Doppler lidar and a wind profiler installed at
Meteorological Data Acquisition System (AMeDAS) NICT observed strong updrafts with vertical velocities
of the Japan Meteorological Agency. The wind of approximately 3 m/s when the sea breeze front
velocities in the plain were small at 0500 LST (Fig. passed. Also, strong backscattered signals that appear
4a), but the sea breeze appeared in the coastal area of to be caused by the cumulus clouds were observed
Tokyo Bay by 0900 LST (Fig. 4b). The wind fields at by the Doppler lidar and a ceilometer at NICT.
1300 LST show inland penetration of the sea breeze
(Fig. 4c). Airflow originating from the Pacific coast MULTI-LAYERED WIND STRUCTURE
toward mountainous regions in the north and west of After the passage of the sea breeze front, vertical
the plain prevailed in the plain at 1700 LST (Fig. 4d). wind fields over Tokyo had a sharp multi-layered
wind structure, as recognized in Figure 2. The SUMMARY
multi-layered wind structure was composed of 1) the Ground-based coherent Doppler lidar observations
sea breeze layer at altitudes below 0.9 km MSL, 2) a were performed in Tokyo on 10 August 2006 in
layer of weak winds at altitudes of 0.9–1.1 km MSL, order to observe horizontal and vertical wind fields
3) the compensatory return flow layer at altitudes of associated with sea breeze circulation. Results of the
1.1–2.2km MSL, and 4) a prevailing synoptic wind lidar observations were analyzed through numerical
at altitudes above 2.2km MSL. Southerly and experiments and meteorological analyses. Strong
northerly winds prevail in the sea breeze layer and updrafts and strong signals backscattered from
the compensatory return flow layer, respectively. The cumulus clouds were observed when a sea breeze
synoptic wind direction is the northwest, which is front passed the lidar. After the passage of the sea
almost perpendicular to the radial wind, resulting in breeze front, a multi-layered vertical wind structure
the small radial wind velocities. The same wind was formed above Tokyo. The layered structure was
structure has been observed in the West Coast and composed of 1) the sea breeze layer, 2) a layer of
the coastal area of the Mediterranean sea (Banta, weak winds, 3) the compensatory return flow layer,
1995; Darby et al., 2002; Lemonsu et al., 2006). and 4) a prevailing northwesterly synoptic wind.

Figure 4. Observed surface wind fields around the Kanto Plain on 10 August 2006: (a) 0500 LST, (b) 0900 LST, (c)
a aa1300 LST, and (d) 1700 LST.
a
Darby L. S., R. M. Banta, and R. A. Pielke, 2002:
Comparison between Mesoscale Model Terrain
Sensitivity Studies and Doppler Lidar
Measurements of the Sea Breeze at Monterey Bay.
Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2813–2838.
Ishii, S., K. Mizutani, T. Aoki, M. Sasano, Y.
Murayama, and T. Itabe, 2005: Wind profiling with
an eye-safe coherent Doppler lidar system:
Comparison with radiosondes and VHF radar. J.
Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 83, 1041–1056.
Kalnay, E., et al., 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year
Reanalysis Project, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77,
437–472.
Kondo, H., 1990: A numerical experiment of the
“extended sea breeze” over the Kanto Plain. J.
Meteor. Soc. Japan, 68, 419–433.
Figure 5. Simulated surface winds and the horizontal Kurita, H., H. Ueda, and S. Mitsumoto, 1990: Combination

adivergences around the Kanto Plain at 1230 of local wind systems under light gradient wind

aLST 10 August 2006. The solid lines within the conditions and its contribution to the long-range transport

abox show the divergence value of –1x10-5s-1. of air pollutants. J. Appl. Meteorol., 29, 331–348.

aThe shading within the box shows the Lemonsu A., S. Bastin, V. Masson, and P. Drobinski,
adivergence values of less than –1x10-4s-1. The 2006: Vertical wind structure of the urban boundary
amesh shows the topography. layer over Marseille under sea-breeze conditions.
Boundary Layer Meteorol., 118, 477–501.
Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill,
REFERENCES D. M. Barker, W. Wang, and J. G. Powers, 2005: A
Banta, R. M., 1995: Sea breezes shallow and deep on the description of the advanced research WRF version
California coast. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 3614–3622. 2. NCAR. Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-468+STR, 88pp.

Synoptic wind

Compensatory return flow

Weak wind
Sea breeze

Sagami Bay Coast Obs.

Figure 6. Vertical cross section of the simulated wind vectors along 139.5°E at 1600 LST 10 August 2006.

You might also like