You are on page 1of 4

Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110481539 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2011

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________

No. 10-3000
____________

LISA LIBERI; PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE;


THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG; EVELYN
ADAMS, a/k/a MOMMA E; LISA M. OSTELLA;
GO EXCEL GLOBAL

v.

ORLY TAITZ, a/k/a DR. ORLY TAITZ, a/k/a LAW OFFICES OF


ORLY TAITZ, a/k/a WWW.ORLYTAITZESQ.COM, a/k/a
WWW.REPUBX.COM, a/k/a ORLY TAITZ, INC.; DEFEND OUR
FREEDOMS FOUNDATIONS, INC.; YOSEF TAITZ; THE
SANKEY FIRM; SANKEY INVESTIGATIONS, INC.; NEIL
SANKEY; JAMES SUNDQUIST; ROCK SALT PUBLISHING;
LINDA SUE BELCHER, a/k/a LINDA S. BELCHER, a/k/a LINDA
STARR, a/k/a NEWWOMENSPARTY, a/k/a STITCHENWITCH,
a/k/a EVA BRAUN, a/k/a WEB SERGEANT, a/k/a KATY, a/k/a
WWW.OBAMACITIZENSHIPDEBATE.ORG; EDGAR HALE,
a/k/a JD SMITH; CAREN HALE; PLAINS RADIO NETWORK,
a/k/a PLAINS RADIO NETWORK, INC., a/k/a PLAINS RADIO;
BAR H FARMS; KPRN AM 1610; DOES 1 THROUGH 200
INCLUSIVE

Orly Taitz; Defend Our Freedoms


Foundations, Inc., Appellants
____________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(D.C. Civ. No. 2-09-cv-01898)
District Judge: Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
____________

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)


February 9, 2011
1
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110481539 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2011

Before: JORDAN, GREENAWAY, JR., and WEIS, Circuit Judges.


____________

JUDGMENT
____________

This cause came to be heard on the record from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was submitted on February 9, 2011.

On consideration whereof, it is here now ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Costs accrued in this litigation to this date will be determined by the

transferee courts.

All of the above is in accordance with the Opinion of this Court.

ATTEST:

/s/ Marcia M. Waldron


Clerk

Dated: 28 March 2011

2
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110481556 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2011

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

MARCIA M. WALDRON UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TELEPHONE


CLERK FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 215-597-2995
21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE
601 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790
Website: www.ca3.uscourts.gov

March 28, 2011

Ms. Linda S. Belcher


201 Paris Street
Castroville, TX 78009

Philip J. Berg
555 Andorra Glen Court
Suite 12
LaFayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Mr. Neil Sankey


4230 Alamo Street
Simi Valley, CA 98063

Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

RE: Lisa Liberi v. Orly Taitz


Case Number: 10-3000
District Case Number: 2-09-cv-01898

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

Today, March 28, 2011 the Court entered its judgment in the above-captioned matter pursuant to
Fed. R. App. P. 36.

If you wish to seek review of the Court's decision, you may file a petition for rehearing. The
procedures for filing a petition for rehearing are set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 40, 3rd Cir.
LAR 35 and 40, and summarized below.
Case: 10-3000 Document: 003110481556 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2011

Time for Filing:


14 days after entry of judgment.
45 days after entry of judgment in a civil case if the United States is a party.

Page Limits:
15 pages
Attachments:
A copy of the panel's opinion and judgment only. No other attachments are permitted without
first obtaining leave from the Court.

Unless the petition specifies that the petition seeks only panel rehearing, the petition will be
construed as requesting both panel and en banc rehearing. If separate petitions for panel
rehearing and rehearing en banc are submitted, they will be treated as a single document and will
be subject to a combined 15 page limit. If only panel rehearing is sought, the Court's rules do not
provide for the subsequent filing of a petition for rehearing en banc in the event that the petition
seeking only panel rehearing is denied.

A party who is entitled to costs pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 39 must file an itemized and verified
bill of costs within 14 days from the entry of judgment. The bill of costs must be submitted on
the proper form which is available on the court's website.

A mandate will be issued at the appropriate time in accordance with the Fed.R.App.P. 41.

Please consult the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the timing and
requirements for filing a petition for writ of certiorari.

Very truly yours,

Marcia M. Waldron,
Clerk

By: Anthony Infante,


Case Manager

You might also like