Baas Crimes DAVIDSON

As of July 14, 2010 and upon an Order handed down by Magistrate Elizabeth Mattingly, Hamilton
County acknowledged lack of Jurisdictional Ability in these matters, and has only accepted jurisdiction
over Melissa Davidson, and William Andrew Davidson regarding Divorce proceedings in these matters,
at this date/time having constituted a bifurcated action, whereupon Hamilton County denies jurisdiction
over Megan Davidson
CORRUPT ACTIVITY
2923.01 [Effective Until 3/24/2011] Conspiracy.
(A) No person, with purpose to commit or to promote or facilitate the commission of aggravated
murder, murder, kidnapping, compelling prostitution, promoting prostitution, aggravated arson, arson,
aggravated robbery, robbery, aggravated burglary, burglary, engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity,
corrupting another with drugs, a felony drug trafficking, manufacturing, processing, or possession
offense, theft of drugs, or illegal processing of drug documents, the commission of a felony offense of
unauthorized use of a vehicle, illegally transmitting multiple commercial electronic mail messages or
unauthorized access of a computer in violation of section 2923.421 of the Revised Code, or the
commission of a violation of any provision of Chapter 3734. of the Revised Code, other than section
3734.18 of the Revised Code, that relates to hazardous wastes, shall do either of the following:
On March 11., 2010 William Andrew Davidson filed Motion/Affidavit for waiver of filing fees due to
Indigent Status, acknowledged BY the court, by its action of allowing proceedings without fee from this
point forth, THEN again on November 29., 2010 an entry by Judge Elizabeth Mattingly reaffirmed both
party's states of Indigent status.
On March 30th, 2010 Patricia Baas did perpetrate Extortion, Intimidation, Criminal Coercion, within the
action of Racketeering whereupon whilst HOLDING MEGAN DAVIDSON hostage by Legal Durress,
and making Threats to William Andrew Davidson...Alluding allegations of neglect against William
Andrew Davidson that are not subject matter, alluding that Megan is not happy with William Andrew
Davidson, dominating the conversation in attempt to place W.A.D under duress...William Andrew
Davidson Requests uncontested divorce, and attempts neutrality as to shared parenting, whereupon P.B.
Requests he email her, rather than discussing the issue at hand, insuring the “divide and conquer”
needed to complete her next schemes against this family. Offering William Andrew Davidson
Supervised visitation, KNOWING he has done nothing wrong, in attempt to garner consent agreement
by ALLUDING he has committed a crime, without a crime having been committed...within eight
minutes, P.B. Begins making threats to William Andrew Davidson Whereupon she REMOVES his
Parenting Time by threat placed upon him upon action of duress...then TELLS HIM, via threat, that he
either AGREES or she will continue and he will NOT see his daughter, by action of
extortion/blackmail/racketeering using MEGAN as HOSTAGE within what appears to be
Piracy...corralling William Andrew Davidson Mentally into agreeing to her Pre-determined outcome,
with a result of her original offer, with a sigh of relief that William Andrew Davidson is BEING
ALLOWED to have ANY time with his daughter, after having been threatened with COMPLETE and
TOTAL loss of PARENTING TIME OR agreeing with said offer...THEN has the audacity to reprimand
William Andrew Davidson For his use of audio and video devices to PROTECT him self from falling
victim as Prey to this Predator, acting under Color of Law as an officer of This Court.
On October 1, 2010 Patricia Baas did allow to occur a finding by the Court that William Andrew
Davidson REFUSED to pay for Melissa Davidson's medical records, upon oral testimony of her self,
although acting as attorney she is fully aware that when a party is Indigent, and there is a question of
matter of fact, record, and or substance, that this be maintained at the expense of the State, as to the
ability to maintain Justice, as well as the Ability of the court to function...
On July 8, 2010 Patricia Baas USED her client, and maintained Melissa Davidson as defendant in a
MOTION to DISMISS SANCTIONS whilst practicing BLATANT extortion with Retaliatory INTENT
by also Motioning for Attorney Fees and Costs, related to Sanction ability, outside of this Courts
Jurisdictional Ability, whereupon using Fraud upon the Court within Corrupt activity, she maintains in
view of the Court that William Andrew Davidson upon Motion for Sanction (a non-attorney) has
somehow having Abused Melissa with such Petition, once again, misimprisoning William Andrew
Davidson as a vexatious litigent, without subject matter, and with Void Motion to dismiss sanctions
against her...Again, practicing Collusion whereupon this very subject of Sanction was also HAND
DELIVERED to the Cincinnati Bar Association, and has since “mysteriously” disappeared, and the
only evidence, being this VOID order to dismiss Sanctions, under Action of Criminal Coercion the least
of Offenses against Administration of Justice, within what appears to be a Racketeering scheme
perpetrated by Patrick Baas. Going so far, in her motion to request Attorney fees on behalf of her
client, constituting Solicitation of Improper Compensation, by action of Criminal Coercion (alluding to
a crime having been committed by William Andrew Davidson and asking This Court to lay Contempt
action upon an Innocent Victim of her Fraudulent Practice w.hereby the Court acted on said motion,
lodged contempt against William Andrew Davidson, maintaining he was responsible for Attorney Fees
and Costs, without having found him by Evidence other than her Fraudulent Testimony, and what
appears to be a childish fit, without Subject Matter, ONLY LATER to be PARTIALLY rectified,
whereupon Patricia Baas allowed once again, by FRAUD and Omission for another Entity to maintain
responsibility for frees and costs, via findings of Indigent status of both parties, which laid the Costs of
her Corrupt actions DIRECTLY upon this Court.
On July 28th., 2010 Patricia Baas did allow her client to file an emergency ex parte motion, that was
DENIED by Magistrate John T. Bruewer in Butler County
On July 29th., 2010 Patricia Baas did file a Motion to Set Aside Magistrates Order in Butler County,
rather than motion to reconsider, as is correct according to court procedure, creating vexatious
litigation, and abuse of process. (now Implicating full KNOWLEDGE of her client's actions, regardless
of attempt to employ Clean Hands Doctrine whilst making it appear that Melissa Davidson was the
vexatious party, maintaining Inefficient Counsel, and allowing a suspected adult in need of services,
and irresponsible Innocent as per crime of Complicity definition. Using sham legal process to
extrapolate her own client, whilst obstructing Justice, and practicing what appears to be racketeering,
whereupon Criminal Coercion is displayed by practice, using subtle threats, and innuendo to infer that
William Andrew Davidson has committed a crime, where none exists. (the child in question, ONE was
not under Jurisdiction of Hamilton County as of July 14, 2010, AND Megan Davidson was not set to
begin going to school until on or about August 23, 2010 (leaving another vexed question as to
EMERGENCY motion, maintaining that the situation is one of EMERGENCY, implicating Abuse of
Process, Criminal Contempt by impeding the ability of the court to function, as well as maintaining a
pattern of Corrupt behavior so egregious whilst maintaining her own sick and twisted agenda, she is not
only failing her client, failing this court, but she is failing ALL real victims of domestic violence that
could otherwise be served by use of the Safety of this Court, and all legal Procedures maintained to
SAVE them from befalling REAL perpetrators of Crimes against them, and or their children. Not to
mention that due to Melissa Davidson's confirmed mental illnesses, which is at least REQUIRING her
REPRESENTATION to work to the best of her ABILITY to PROTECT Melissa, Patricia Baas is
seemingly on a quest to extort not only William Andrew Davidson via Abuse of Process, and all other
Actions, but appears to be extorting an Adult in Need of Services, by fraudulent means, and actions,
using their shared child as a pawn, held hostage by Fraud upon this court, and all parties involved,
including Megan Davidson, whose wishes have been maintained on record to be done with this fiasco.
Patricia Baas has maintained a pattern of Corrupt behavior whereby her client believes that William
Andrew Davidson is responsible for the majority of Litigation, however, every Action besides ONE
petition for CPO and the initial Divorce Petition has been in Defense against NUMEROUS fraudulent
claims facilitated by Patricia Baas and her client, known to be mentally disabled, whereupon Melissa
Davidson has gone from a wife/mother willing to attempt reconciliation with William Andrew
Davidson, with William Andrew Davidson willing to work WITH Melissa Davidson and help her work
through her mental disability to his own detriment having been assaulted, having had his teenage
daughter from a previous marriage assaulted by Melissa during one of her “episodes” whereby she had
failed to maintain her prescribed medications, and or therapy needed to maintain a healthy mental state,
whereupon she IS capable of taking care of her self, and their shared child, HOWEVER, Patricia Baas
has established a pattern of Victimizing her client to the extent that Melissa Davidson believes that all
of her problems, and or mental disability hasve been Caused by William Andrew Davidson however, on
RECORD with Hamilton County is the Initial child protection reports from 2005 whereupon Melissa
was KNOWN by the Court, and her Representation to have had a long standing mental disability far at
least that many years, and in FACT, during that horrific time for this family Melissa had shown a
pattern of suicidal idealization, on at Least four occasions in the preceding two years, suggesting
ongoing mental health issues, perhaps dating back to her childhood, whereupon she was made the
victim of sexual abuse (as per her claims to her then Husband, William Andrew Davidson) , as well as
suffering at the hands of bullies throughout high-school, whereupon she presents as a very shy, quiet,
timid female without ability to realize her self, and her potential as a human being. When William
Andrew Davidson met Melissa he felt endeared as her Protector of sorts, due to her shyness, but
watched her grow whilst they were together into a slightly more assertive individual, until the incidents
in 2005 which were preceded by the death of her biological father whom she had recently learned of,
having been lied to by her mother and told that her Step-Father had been her biological father, which
was traumatic enough to prompt a down-word turn as to Melissa's mental state, whilst William Andrew
Davidson watched on, helpless, whilst she spun so far out of control, that she began having delusion as
to having been the victim of assault so egregious she claimed he had broken her arm, then recanted, and
was so delusional at one point, she made claims that her own mother, and or significant other (report
states “Megan's Maternal Grandparents”) were making Megan and her self, eat and drink poison, after
alleging that Megal had been physically, and sexually abused by Several family members...on this
occasion Melissa was remanded for a 72 hour psychiatric hold.
On July 30, 2010 Patricia Baas did allow Melissa Davidson to file Petition for Domestic Violence Civil
Protection Order (CPO) (after July 14, 2010 whereupon Hamilton County denied JURISDICTION over
Megan Davidson , in ATTEMPT to fraudulently maintain jurisdiction over Megan Davidson in
Hamilton County, in BLATANT disregard to Judicial Order, constituting Contempt of Court, Fraud
upon the Court, whilst having KNOWLEDGE that upon impending expiration of a CPO one must
motion for extension within fourteen days of expiration, HOWEVER Patricia Baas instead set out on a
journey of Vexatious Litigation, practicing Abuse of Process, and a myriad of other Offenses Against
Justice and Public Administration.
On August 17, 2010 Patricia Baas did file motion for contempt against William Andrew Davidson for
failure to comply with the ex parte TEMORARY CPO issued by the Court on July 30, 2010 in
Hamilton County, again attempting to FORCE this court to maintain Jurisdiction after this Court had
already denied jurisdiction over Megan Davidson, HAVING KNOWLEDGE that the hearing on August
16, 2010 , was taken UNDER ADVISEMENT, and no FULL CPO had been issued , although this is
what she maintained in Hamilton County...although by this time, there had been one CPO denied in
Butler County, by Judge Bruewer,
On August 25, 2010 Magistrate Bruewer issued order for Butler County Children's Services to facilitate
a home/parenting evaluation (Social Summary) on both parties...which was completed on September
21, 2010 however, not given to either party until December, PROMPTING William Andrew Davidson
not only to defend against Melissa's and Patricia Baas allegations, but to once again attempt to
PROTECT their shared child, due to various OMMISSIONS within the report, failure of Patricia and
her client to be forthcoming in regards to Melissa's mental disability, and once again, maintaining that
William Andrew Davidson is the aggressor in this situation, whilst maintaining that her client is the
Victim of Vexatious Litigation...at this time, William Andrew Davidson caused action of Subpoena
whereupon Patricia Baas not only attempted to Quash said Subpoena at detriment to the child involved,
and the REASON this Court (Butler County) is maintaining Jurisdiction and ORDERED
aforementioned Evaluation of BOTH parents to insure Megan Davidson's safety...Patricia Baas went so
far as to make WILLFUL contact by WRITTEN instrument to AT LEAST one WITNESS so
subpoenaed, constituting yet again, Tampering With Evidence, Intimidation, Fraud upon the Court,
Criminal Contempt, Obstruction of Justice, Obstructing Official Business, whilst using Sham Legal
Process, and a myriad of other offenses, against this Court, the entire Legal Community, and general
public at large within now, an extremely noticeable, and prevalent pattern of corrupt behavior not only
unbecoming of an officer of this Court, but of ANY citizen within the realms of natural Society as a
whole, making her an imminent, hostile, aggressive, contentious, malevolent, malignant and repugnant
member of society, appearing to Prey upon the weakest and or most vulnerable members of our once
believed to be quiet, safe, secure Hamlets prior to having been exposed to such a vile individual capable
of such atrocities upon not only William Andrew, and Melissa Davidson, but upon an innocent child,
now within the context of such aggression wrought by this Corrupt, soul-less being, forced to watch this
play out, as Patricia Baas maintains her own client in a state of constant anxiety, mistrust, apprehension,
causing such aggressive behavior as seen this past summer, whereupon back to back, there were
numerous Fraudulent Emergency temporary CPOs sought by Melissa without cause, although likely
caused by Constant reminder of Patricia Baas that Someone was out to get her, FORCING via Fraud,
actions performed by an Innocent, Adult in Need of Services.
On August 18th., 2010 Patricia Baas did file an affidavit in HAMILTON COUNTY upon a Motion for
ex parte emergency order regarding school placement
On August 18th., 2010 Patricia Baas did file a motion for ex parte emergency order regarding school
placement in BUTLER county, maintaining an allegation in a previous fraudulent ex parte CPO to
obtain an exparte order of Butler County on emergency basis to enroll Megan Davidson in Melissa
Davidson's district as a Protected Person, after a Consent agreement had expired, posing a vexed
question, as well as Abuse of Process, using back to back emergency ex parte motions to facilitate this
order, although the previous CPO motion had not been heard, and this was not included within the
original motion...also alleging that William Andrew Davidson was in Contempt of that order, although
an order did not yet exist, constituting Criminal Coercion, whereby Patricia Baas actions resulted in the
laying of Coercive action upon William Andrew Davidson, and Megan Davidson was enrolled in
Melissa's district, also maintaining Fraud upon the Court
On August 19 ., 2010 Judge Kathleen D. Romans entered Judgement/Entry on motion to set aside
Magistrate's order, maintaining the motion is NOT well taken, and DENIED at 10:09 a.m. In Butler
County, Ohio, regarding the CPO Motion on July 29, 2010 .
(August 19, 2010) THEN at 10:46 a.m. In Butler County, OH, Patricia Baas did allow Melissa
Davidson to Motion for Emergency Ex Parte Order naming again, Megan Davidson as a VICTIM,
having been DENIED CPO forty six minutes prior on the SAME claim, by Kathleen D. Romans,
whereby Judge Breuewer Ordered temporary emergency orders upon yet another fraudulent claim,
using Megan as a pawn in this game of extortion/intimidation/criminal coercion, and kidnapping by
Fraud upon the court.
On August 23, 2010 Patricia Baas caused by her own Actions, pertaining to Criminal Contempt and
Fraud upon this Court, Judge Kathleen Romans to INFER that an EMERGENCY existed regarding
Megan Davidson, as a Protected Minor, through the use of NUMEROUS fraudulent Ex Parte
EMERGENCY motions, whereupon Consensus Reality had been created to the extent that Judge
Romans felt the need to protect Megan Davidson from her Father, without Cause...as so noted, within
the following incident, whereupon Magistrate Kathy King VACATES the CPO, DENYING the CPO,
which is the final of “the summer of hell” Facilitated by the Actions of Patricia Baas, whereupon in
action of Corruption, this Monster, perpetrating all manner of crime against this Family, including an
adult in need of service, and a minor child, SUCCEEDED in fraudulently KIDNAPPING Megan
Davidson, whilst also holding her Parents hostage in variant forms of duress, compulsion, and both
blatant and subtle usage of extortion techniques, this family, now lies at the mercy of the steady hands
of Law enforcement, in hopes that at last, Justice may be served, a child can be free from bonds of bail
placed upon her and her family by Patricia Baas, and these two parents can again, enjoy their rights,
maintained by Citizenship in this Great Country, KNOWN around the Globe for upholding Our
Foundation, and Swiftly removing any and all forms of Corrupt Activity from our midst in Our
Collective Quest to Maintain Liberty, and Justice for ALL.
On August 25., 2010 Magistrate Kathy King enters a dismissal on the ex parte motion (vacating CPO,
DENYING CPO) (res judicata {already been decided upon} in HAMILTON COUNTY
On August 25, 2010 Magistrate Bruewer issued order for Butler County Children's Services to facilitate
Butler County Children's Services CLOSES their Investigation on September 27, 2010...by default upon
Action of BCCS , and DIRECTLY and indirectly due to Miss Baas' Corrupt Activities BCCS appears to
be maintaining that Melissa is without mental disability, having not been provided any Pertinent mental
health records, or diagnosis, and relying on yet another set of Actions set in motion by Patricia Baas,
whereupon rather than the Original experts having been witness to Melissa's “episodes” and actual
mental ability, Miss Baas appears to have handpicked within fraudulent practice a NEW set of
“experts” having at best seen Melissa a handful of times, at the Convenience of Miss Baas, and outside
of any Problematic mental state, whereupon all of a sudden Melissa Davidson is now with diagnosis to
match Baas' coaching, inferring, promoting, insisting and otherwise grooming techniques, normally
seen in the context of psychopathy within child sexual Predation practice, whereupon the Perpetrators
of such atrocity, objectifies their victims to maintain material and equitable title as to states of Control,
and subjugation of the most frail, meek, and requiring that Village mentality, whereupon it is Human
nature to surround and Protect such members of our “herd” rather than pick them off for what appears
to be some type of entertainment value, combined with the revenue being generated through Victim
Compensation Funds, and the yet more sinister action of not only extorting this family in all facets,
extorting not ONE disabled individual on limited income, but William Andrew Davidson is also
receiving Social Security Disability due to having been a type 1 diabetic for 33 years of his life, without
realizing what was the cause of such as the severe neuropathy and other adverse effects of having gone
undiagnosed for so long...But, all in all, one must constantly remained focused on Miss Baas' egregious
actions, upon the child involved in this case...the SUBJECT of this case, seeking, through her Father,
Protections offered by the Court, and finding nothing but Impediment after Impediment in perpetual,
habitual, and malicious action by Patricia Baas, not only maintaining this fraud upon the Court, and
Community at large, but by Actively and with viscous intent, and reprehensible and a moral actions
have denied this child, not only her father, and a mentally healthy mother, but Justice, which is the
Foundation of not only This Court, our Community, but our entire Nation....
2923.03 Complicity.
(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do
any of the following:
(1) Solicit or procure another to commit the offense;
(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense;
(3) Conspire with another to commit the offense in violation of section 2923.01 of the Revised Code;
(4) Cause an innocent or irresponsible person to commit the offense.
obtain an ex parte order of Butler County on emergency basis to enroll Megan Davidson in Melissa
THEN at 10:46 a.m. In Butler County, OH, Patricia Baas did allow Melissa Davidson to Motion for
Emergency Ex Parte Order naming again, Megan Davidson as a VICTIM, having been DENIED CPO
forty six minutes prior on the SAME claim, by Kathleen D. Romans, whereby Judge Breuewer Ordered
temporary emergency orders upon yet another fraudulent claim, using Megan as a pawn in this game of
extortion/intimidation/criminal coercion, and kidnapping by Fraud upon the court.
DENYING CPO)
On Autust 25, 2010 Magistrate Bruewer issued order for Butler County Children's Services to facilitate
Chapter 2921: OFFENSES AGAINST JUSTICE

AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
2921.01 Offenses against justice and public administration
general definitions.
As used in sections 2921.01 to 2921.45 of the Revised Code:
2921.03 Intimidation.
(A) No person, knowingly and by force, by unlawful threat of harm to any person or property, or by
filing, recording, or otherwise using a materially false or fraudulent writing with malicious purpose, in
bad faith, or in a wanton or reckless manner, shall attempt to influence, intimidate, or hinder a public
servant , party official, or witness in the discharge of the person’s duty.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of intimidation, a felony of the third degree.
(C) A person who violates this section is liable in a civil action to any person harmed by the violation
for injury, death, or loss to person or property incurred as a result of the commission of the offense and
for reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, and other expenses incurred as a result of prosecuting the
civil action commenced under this division. A civil action under this division is not the exclusive
remedy of a person who incurs injury, death, or loss to person or property as a result of a violation of
this section.
On August 19 ., 2010 Judge Kathleen D. Romans entered Judgment/Entry on motion to set aside
actions performed upon this Innocent, Adult in Need of Services.
2921.11 Perjury.
(A) No person, in any official proceeding, shall knowingly make a false statement under oath or
affirmation, or knowingly swear or affirm the truth of a false statement previously made, when either
statement is material.
(B) A falsification is material, regardless of its admissibility in evidence, if it can affect the course or
outcome of the proceeding. It is no defense to a charge under this section that the offender mistakenly
believed a falsification to be immaterial.
(C) It is no defense to a charge under this section that the oath or affirmation was administered or taken
in an irregular manner.
(D) Where contradictory statements relating to the same material fact are made by the offender under
oath or affirmation and within the period of the statute of limitations for perjury, it is not necessary for
the prosecution to prove which statement was false, but only that one or the other was false.
(E) No person shall be convicted of a violation of this section where proof of falsity rests solely upon
contradiction by testimony of one person other than the defendant.
(F) Whoever violates this section is guilty of perjury, a felony of the third degree.
Effective Date: 01-01-1974
On July 29th., 2010 Patricia Baas did file a Motion to Set Aside Magistrate's order in Butler County
On August 18th., 2010 Patricia Baas did file an affidavi in HAMILTON COUNTY upon a Motion for
Protection Order (CPO) in Hamilton County (after July 14, 2010 whereupon Hamilton County denied
JURISDICTION over Megan Davidson , in ATTEMPT to fraudulently maintain jurisdiction over
Megan Davidson in Hamilton County, in BLATANT disregard to a Judicial Order, constituting
Contempt of Court, Fraud upon the Court, whilst having KNOWLEDGE that upon impending
expiration of a CPO one must motion for extension within fourteen days of expiration, HOWEVER
Patricia Baas instead set out on a journey of Vexatious Litigation, practicing Abuse of Process, and a
myriad of other Offenses Against Justice and Public Administration.
Melissa's district, also maintaining Fraud upon the Court.
DENYING CPO)
2921.12 Tampering with evidence.

(A) No person, knowing that an official proceeding or investigation is in progress, or is about to be or
likely to be instituted, shall do any of the following:
(1) Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or thing, with purpose to impair its value
or availability as evidence in such proceeding or investigation;
(2) Make, present, or use any record, document, or thing, knowing it to be false and with purpose to
mislead a public official who is or may be engaged in such proceeding or investigation, or with purpose
to corrupt the outcome of any such proceeding or investigation.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of tampering with evidence, a felony of the third degree.
Regarding NUMEROUS attempts by Patricia Baas to RESTRAIN release of Melissa's mental health
records, REQUIRED to insure the safety of not only her client, but the child involved in these
proceedings, of material, substantive, and factual nature, as required in a Court of Justice
On August 19 ., 2010 Judge Kathleen D. Romans entered Judgment/Entry on motion to set aside
2921.14 Making or causing false report of child abuse or neglect.
(A) No person shall knowingly make or cause another person to make a false report under division (B)
of section 2151.421 of the Revised Code alleging that any person has committed an act or omission that
resulted in a child being an abused child as defined in section 2151.031 of the Revised Code or a
neglected child as defined in section 2151.03 of the Revised Code.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of making or causing a false report of child abuse or child
neglect, a misdemeanor of the first degree.
On July 29th., 2010 Patricia Baas did file a Motion to Set Aside Magistrates Order in Butler County
DENYING CPO)
2921.31 Obstructing official business.

(A) No person, without privilege to do so and with purpose to prevent, obstruct, or delay the
performance by a public official of any authorized act within the public official’s official capacity, shall
do any act that hampers or impedes a public official in the performance of the public official’s lawful
duties.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of obstructing official business. Except as otherwise
provided in this division, obstructing official business is a misdemeanor of the second degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to any person, obstructing official business is a
felony of the fifth degree.
On August 25., 2010 Magistrate Kathy King enters a decision Vacating the CPO, DENYING request for
CPO
2921.32 Obstructing justice.

(A) No person, with purpose to hinder the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, conviction, or
punishment of another for crime or to assist another to benefit from the commission of a crime, and no
person, with purpose to hinder the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, adjudication as a delinquent
child, or disposition of a child for an act that if committed by an adult would be a crime or to assist a
child to benefit from the commission of an act that if committed by an adult would be a crime, shall do
any of the following:
(1) Harbor or conceal the other person or child;
(2) Provide the other person or child with money, transportation, a weapon, a disguise, or other means
of avoiding discovery or apprehension;
(3) Warn the other person or child of impending discovery or apprehension;
(4) Destroy or conceal physical evidence of the crime or act, or induce any person to withhold
testimony or information or to elude legal process summoning the person to testify or supply evidence;
(5) Communicate false information to any person;
(6) Prevent or obstruct any person, by means of force, intimidation, or deception, from performing any
act to aid in the discovery, apprehension, or prosecution of the other person or child.
(B) A person may be prosecuted for, and may be convicted of or adjudicated a delinquent child for
committing, a violation of division (A) of this section regardless of whether the person or child aided
ultimately is apprehended for, is charged with, is convicted of, pleads guilty to, or is adjudicated a
delinquent child for committing the crime or act the person or child aided committed. The crime or act
the person or child aided committed shall be used under division (C) of this section in determining the
penalty for the violation of division (A) of this section, regardless of whether the person or child aided
ultimately is apprehended for, is charged with, is convicted of, pleads guilty to, or is adjudicated a
delinquent child for committing the crime or act the person or child aided committed.
(C)(1) Whoever violates this section is guilty of obstructing justice.
(2) If the crime committed by the person aided is a misdemeanor or if the act committed by the child
aided would be a misdemeanor if committed by an adult, obstructing justice is a misdemeanor of the
same degree as the crime committed by the person aided or a misdemeanor of the same degree that the
act committed by the child aided would be if committed by an adult.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in divisions (C)(4) and (5) of this section, if the crime committed by
the person aided is a felony or if the act committed by the child aided would be a felony if committed
by an adult, obstructing justice is a felony of the fifth degree.
(4) If the crime committed by the person aided is aggravated murder, murder, or a felony of the first or
second degree or if the act committed by the child aided would be one of those offenses if committed
by an adult and if the offender knows or has reason to believe that the crime committed by the person
aided is one of those offenses or that the act committed by the child aided would be one of those
offenses if committed by an adult, obstructing justice is a felony of the third degree.
(5) If the crime or act committed by the person or child aided is an act of terrorism, obstructing justice
is one of the following:
(a) Except as provided in division (C)(5)(b) of this section, a felony of the second degree;
(b) If the act of terrorism resulted in the death of a person who was not a participant in the act of
terrorism, a felony of the first degree.
(D) As used in this section:
(1) “Adult” and “child” have the same meanings as in section 2151.011 of the Revised Code.
(2) “Delinquent child” has the same meaning as in section 2152.02 of the Revised Code.
(3) “Act of terrorism” has the same meaning as in section 2909.21 of the Revised Code.
DENYING CPO)
2921.45 Interfering with civil rights.
(A) No public servant, under color of his office, employment, or authority, shall knowingly deprive, or
conspire or attempt to deprive any person of a constitutional or statutory right.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of interfering with civil rights, a misdemeanor of the first
degree.
On July 28., 2010 Patricia Baas did allow her client to file an emergency ex parte motion that was
On August 25th., 2010 Magistrate Kathy King enters decision Vacating CPO, DENYING request for
CPO
2921.52 Using sham legal process.

(A) As used in this section:
(1) “Lawfully issued” means adopted, issued, or rendered in accordance with the United States
constitution, the constitution of a state, and the applicable statutes, rules, regulations, and ordinances of
the United States, a state, and the political subdivisions of a state.
(2) “State” means a state of the United States, including without limitation, the state legislature, the
highest court of the state that has statewide jurisdiction, the offices of all elected state officers, and all
departments, boards, offices, commissions, agencies, institutions, and other instrumentalities of the
state. “State” does not include the political subdivisions of the state.
(3) “Political subdivisions” means municipal corporations, townships, counties, school districts, and all
other bodies corporate and politic that are organized under state law and are responsible for
governmental activities only in geographical areas smaller than that of a state.
(4) “Sham legal process” means an instrument that meets all of the following conditions:
(a) It is not lawfully issued.
(b) It purports to do any of the following:
(i) To be a summons, subpoena, judgment, or order of a court, a law enforcement officer, or a
legislative, executive, or administrative body.
(ii) To assert jurisdiction over or determine the legal or equitable status, rights, duties, powers, or
privileges of any person or property.
(iii) To require or authorize the search, seizure, indictment, arrest, trial, or sentencing of any person or
property.
(c) It is designed to make another person believe that it is lawfully issued.
(B) No person shall, knowing the sham legal process to be sham legal process, do any of the following:
(1) Knowingly issue, display, deliver, distribute, or otherwise use sham legal process;
(2) Knowingly use sham legal process to arrest, detain, search, or seize any person or the property of
another person;
(3) Knowingly commit or facilitate the commission of an offense, using sham legal process;
(4) Knowingly commit a felony by using sham legal process.
(C) It is an affirmative defense to a charge under division (B)(1) or (2) of this section that the use of
sham legal process was for a lawful purpose.
(D) Whoever violates this section is guilty of using sham legal process. A violation of division (B)(1) of
this section is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. A violation of division (B)(2) or (3) of this section is
a misdemeanor of the first degree, except that, if the purpose of a violation of division (B)(3) of this
section is to commit or facilitate the commission of a felony, a violation of division (B)(3) of this
section is a felony of the fourth degree. A violation of division (B)(4) of this section is a felony of the
third degree.
(E) A person who violates this section is liable in a civil action to any person harmed by the violation
for injury, death, or loss to person or property incurred as a result of the commission of the offense and
for reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, and other expenses incurred as a result of prosecuting the
civil action commenced under this division. A civil action under this division is not the exclusive
remedy of a person who incurs injury, death, or loss to person or property as a result of a violation of
this section.
of her problems, and or mental disability have been Caused by William Andrew Davidson however, on
alleging that Megan had been physically, and sexually abused by Several family members...on this
DENYING CPO)
2905.12 Coercion.
(A) No person, with purpose to coerce another into taking or refraining from action concerning which
the other person has a legal freedom of choice, shall do any of the following:
(1) Threaten to commit any offense;
(2) Utter or threaten any calumny against any person;
(3) Expose or threaten to expose any matter tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt, or
ridicule, to damage any person’s personal or business repute, or to impair any person’s credit;
(4) Institute or threaten criminal proceedings against any person;
(5) Take, withhold, or threaten to take or withhold official action, or cause or threaten to cause official
action to be taken or withheld.
(B) Divisions (A)(4) and (5) of this section shall not be construed to prohibit a prosecutor or court from
doing any of the following in good faith and in the interests of justice:
(1) Offering or agreeing to grant, or granting immunity from prosecution pursuant to section 2945.44 of
the Revised Code;
(2) In return for a plea of guilty to one or more offenses charged or to one or more other or lesser
offenses, or in return for the testimony of the accused in a case to which the accused is not a party,
offering or agreeing to dismiss, or dismissing one or more charges pending against an accused, or
offering or agreeing to impose, or imposing a certain sentence or modification of sentence;
(3) Imposing a community control sanction on certain conditions, including without limitation
requiring the offender to make restitution or redress to the victim of the offense.
(C) It is an affirmative defense to a charge under division (A)(3), (4), or (5) of this section that the
actor’s conduct was a reasonable response to the circumstances that occasioned it, and that the actor’s
purpose was limited to any of the following:
(1) Compelling another to refrain from misconduct or to desist from further misconduct;
(2) Preventing or redressing a wrong or injustice;
(3) Preventing another from taking action for which the actor reasonably believed the other person to
be disqualified;
(4) Compelling another to take action that the actor reasonably believed the other person to be under a
duty to take.
(D) Whoever violates this section is guilty of coercion, a misdemeanor of the second degree.
(E) As used in this section:
(1) “Threat” includes a direct threat and a threat by innuendo.
(2) “Community control sanction” has the same meaning as in section 2929.01 of the Revised Code.
2921.43 Soliciting or accepting improper compensation.

(A) No public servant shall knowingly solicit or accept, and no person shall knowingly promise or give
to a public servant, either of the following:
(1) Any compensation, other than as allowed by divisions (G), (H), and (I) of section 102.03 of the
Revised Code or other provisions of law, to perform the public servant’s official duties, to perform any
other act or service in the public servant’s public capacity, for the general performance of the duties of
the public servant’s public office or public employment, or as a supplement to the public servant’s
public compensation;
(2) Additional or greater fees or costs than are allowed by law to perform the public servant’s official
duties.
(B) No public servant for the public servant’s own personal or business use, and no person for the
person’s own personal or business use or for the personal or business use of a public servant or party
official, shall solicit or accept anything of value in consideration of either of the following:
(1) Appointing or securing, maintaining, or renewing the appointment of any person to any public
office, employment, or agency;
(2) Preferring, or maintaining the status of, any public employee with respect to compensation, duties,
placement, location, promotion, or other material aspects of employment.
(C) No person for the benefit of a political party, campaign committee, legislative campaign fund,
political action committee, or political contributing entity shall coerce any contribution in consideration
of either of the following:
(1) Appointing or securing, maintaining, or renewing the appointment of any person to any public
office, employment, or agency;
(2) Preferring, or maintaining the status of, any public employee with respect to compensation, duties,
placement, location, promotion, or other material aspects of employment.
(D) Whoever violates this section is guilty of soliciting improper compensation, a misdemeanor of the
first degree.
(E) A public servant who is convicted of a violation of this section is disqualified from holding any
public office, employment, or position of trust in this state for a period of seven years from the date of
conviction.
(F) Divisions (A), (B), and (C) of this section do not prohibit a person from making voluntary
contributions to a political party, campaign committee, legislative campaign fund, political action
committee, or political contributing entity or prohibit a political party, campaign committee, legislative
campaign fund, political action committee, or political contributing entity from accepting voluntary
contributions.
Effective Date: 07-13-1998; 03-31-2005; 04-26-2005
On July 8, 2010 Patricia Baas USED her client, and maintained Melissa Davidson as defendant in a
MOTION to DISMISS SANCTIONS whilst practicing BLATANT extortion with Retaliatory INTENT
by also Motioning for Attorney Fees and Costs, related to Sanction ability, outside of this Courts
Jurisdictional Ability, whereupon using Fraud upon the Court within Corrupt activity, she maintains in
view of the Court that William Andrew Davidson upon Motion for Sanction (a non-attorney) has
somehow having Abused Melissa with such Petition, once again, misimprisoning William Andrew
Davidson as a vexatious litigent, without subject matter, and with Void Motion to dismiss sanctions
against her...Again, practicing Collusion whereupon this very subject of Sanction was also HAND
DELIVERED to the Cincinnati Bar Association, and has since “mysteriously” disappeared, and the
only evidence, being this VOID order to dismiss Sanctions, under Action of Criminal Coercion the least
of Offenses against Administration of Justice, within what appears to be a Racketeering scheme
perpetrated by Patrick Baas. Going so far, in her motion to request Attorney fees on behalf of her
client, constituting Solicitation of Improper Compensation, by action of Criminal Coercion (alluding to
a crime having been committed by William Andrew Davidson and asking This Court to lay Contempt
action upon an Innocent Victim of her Fraudulent Practice w.hereby the Court acted on said motion,
lodged contempt against William Andrew Davidson, maintaining he was responsible for Attorney Fees
and Costs, without having found him by Evidence other than her Fraudulent Testimony, and what
appears to be a childish fit, without Subject Matter, ONLY LATER to be PARTIALLY rectified,
whereupon Patricia Baas allowed once again, by FRAUD and Omission for another Entity to maintain
responsibility for frees and costs, via findings of Indigent status of both parties, which laid the Costs of
her Corrupt actions DIRECTLY upon this Court.

Baas Crimes DAVIDSON

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Baas Crimes DAVIDSON

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

As of July 14, 2010 and upon an Order handed down by Magistrate Elizabeth Mattingly, Hamilton

Chapter 2921: OFFENSES AGAINST JUSTICE

2921.12 Tampering with evidence.

2921.31 Obstructing official business.

2921.32 Obstructing justice.

2921.52 Using sham legal process.

2921.43 Soliciting or accepting improper compensation.

You might also like