ATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICTCOTIRT

OF HENNEPIN FOURTHJTIDICIALDISTRICT

itv of Orono. a Minnesota CourtFile No.:

cipal corporation,
CaseType: OtherCivil
Plaintifl

SUMMONS

T. Nygard and Kendall M. Nygard,

Defendants.

IS SI.]MMONSIS DIRECTEDTO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:

1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. ThePlaintiffhasstarteda lawsuitagainstyou. The

aintiff s Complaint againstyou is attachedto this Summons. Do not throw thesepapersaway.
are official papersthat affect your rights. You must respondto this lawsuit even though it
ay not yet be filed with the Court and theremay be no court file number on this Summons.

2. you MUST REpLy WITHIN TWENTY (20)DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR

GHTS. You must give or mail to the personwho signedthis Summonsa written response
led an Answer within twenty (20) days of the date on which you received this Summons. You
ust send a copy of your Answer to the personwho signedthis Summonslocated at:

CampbellKnutson,P.A.
1380CorporateCenterCurve,Suite317
Eagan,Minnesota 55121

3. YOU MUST RESPOND TO EACH CLAIM. The Answer is your written

ponseto the Plaintiff s Complaint. In your Answer you must statewhether you agreeor
sagreewith eachparagraphof the Complaint. If you believethe Plaintiff shouldnot be given
'erything askedfor in the Complaint, you must say so in your Answer.

4. YOU WILL LOSE YOUR CASEIF YOU DO NOT SENDA WRITTEN

SPONSETO THE COMPLAINT TO THE PERSONWHO SIGNED THIS
MMONS. If you do not answerwithin twenty (20) days,you will lose this case. You will
t get to tell your side of the story, and the Court may decide againstyou and award the
tiff everything askedfor in the Complaint. If you do not want to contestthe claims statedin
 Complaint, you do not need to respond. A default judgment can then be enteredagainstyou
the relief requestedin the Complaint.

5. LEGAL ASSISTANCE. You may wish to get legal help from a lawyer. If you
not have a lawyer, the Court Administrator may have information about placeswhere you can
legal assistance.Even if you cannot get legal help, you must still provide a written
wer to protect your rights or you may lose the case.

6. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties may agreeto or be

to participatein an altemativedisputeresolutionprocessunderRule 114 of the
innesotaGeneralRules of Practice. You must still sendyour written responseto the
omplaint even if you expectto use alternativemeansof resolvingthis dispute.

IK ,2 0 1 7 CAMPBELL KNUTSON
ProfessionaI Association

,T"h.hrr,ffiarrt
SorenM. Mattick, #27785X
317 EagandaleOffice Center
1380 CorporateCenterCurve
Eagan,Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (651) 452-5000
Attorneys for Plaintiff
 ATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICTCOURT

LINTY OF HENNEPIN FOI'RTH JI.IDICIALDISTRICT

ty of Orono, a Minnesota Court File No.:

icipal corporation,
CaseType: Other Civil
Plaintifl

COMPLAINT

y T. Nygard and Kendall M. Nygard,

Defendants.

Plaintiff, for its Complaint againstDefendants,statesand allegesas follows:

COMMON ALLEGATIONS

Plaintiff is a Minnesotamunicipal corporationlocatedin HennepinCounty,

2. Defendantsare the ownersof propertylocatedat 1386Rest Point Road in the City

Orono, County of Hennepin,Stateof Minnesotaand legally describedas follows:

Lot 5, Subdivision of Lot 14, Rest Point Park, Lake Minnetonka,

Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recordedplat thereof

ubjectProperty'').

3. The SubjectPropertyis zonedLR-IB OneFamilyLakeshore

Residential.The

bjectPropertyis alsoShorelandpropertyasdefinedby OronoCity CodeSection78-l2ll and

subjectto the ShorelandOverlayDistrict Standards.

 4. On October1,2010 Defendantsappliedfor a Building Permit from Plaintiff for a

generator.

5. On October 15,2010 Plaintiff deniedthe Building Permit becausea wind

is not an allowed useunderthe Orono City Code.

6. On November 12,2010 Plaintiff becameawarethat the Defendantsbegan

ling concretefootings on the Subject Property for the wind generatorwithout a permit. The

ty issueda Stop Work Order on November 16,2010 directingDefendantsto ceaseall

ction activity and removethe concretefootings.

7. In violation of the Stoo Work Order. on or aboutFebruarv12.2011 Defendants

lled a metal supportpole for the wind generatorand installed the turbine and rotors on or

ut February23,2011.

8. The wind generatorand concretepad continueto be locatedupon the Subject

9. Defendantsdo not have an adequateremedy at law.

10. Defendantsare entitledto injunctive relief to enjoin the on-goingviolations of the

City Code.

COUNT ONE
(PROHIBITED USE)

11. Orono City Code Sections78-327(permitteduses),78-328(conditionaluses)and

329 (accessoryuses)governthe typesof usesthat are allowed within LR-18. Wind

rs are not an allowed use.

COUNT TWO
(LAKESHORE SETBACA

12. statesin relevantpartasfollows:

OronoCity CodeSection78-1279(6)
 No principal or accessorystructureshall be located closer to the lakeshorethan
the averagedistancefrom the shorelineof existing residencebuildings on
adjacentlots; exceptthat this doesnot apply to stairways,lifts, landings and
lockboxes. Further,the averagelakeshoresetbackshall apply only to classified
lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The averagelakeshoresetbackline shall
be a straightline connectingthe most lakewardprotrusionsof the residence
buildings on the immediatelyadjacentlakeshorelots.

13. The concretepad and wind generatorare locatedcloserto the lakeshorethan

lowedby City CodeSectionTS-L279.

COUNT THREE
(SIDE YARD SETBACK)

t4. City CodeSection78-1405(6)states:

(6) In side yardsonly, no accessorystructureshall be closerthan ten feet from

any side lot line.

15. The concretepad and wind generatorare located closer to the side lot line than ten

0') feet.

COUNT FOUR
(SETBACK FROM PRINCIPAL BUILDING
AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURE)

16. City CodeSection78-1438states:

No accessorybuilding or structure,unless an integral part of the principal

building, shall be erected,alteredor moved within ten feet of the principal
building, nor within ten feet of anotheraccessorystructure.

17. The concretepad and wind generatorare locatedcloserthan ten (10') feet to the

ipal building md anotheraccessorystructure.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demandsjudgment againstDefendantas follows:

1. Determinationthat the wind generatorviolatesthe Orono City Code;

2. Enjoining Defendantsfrom locating and operating a wind generatorupon the

bjectProperty;
 . Directing that Defendantsimmediately terminate the operation of the wind

r and remove the wind generator,concretepad and concretefootings; and

. Awarding the City its costs and disbursements.

\J l( ,2 0 1 r CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Profes sio n al As sociatio n

SorenM. Mattick, #27785X

3I7 EagandaleOffice Center
1380 CorporateCenterCurve
Eagan,Minnesota 55121
Telephone:(651)452-5000
Attomevs for Plaintiff

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The undersignedhereby acknowledgesthat sanctionsmay be imposed pursuantto Minn.

5s49.2r1.

SorenM. Mattick.#21785X: