1. THE 'EVOLUTIONARY THEORY' IS The 'First Law Of Thermodynamics'?
w Of Thermodynamics'? ving organisms are constantly in flux ('evolving'),
PREPOSTEROUS.
1.1 It Is A Tragi-Comedy. It is both tragic and
comical ... Evolutionists who still argue against
Intelligent Design and Special Creation ... with
'arguments' they 'intelligently designed' and
'specially created' ... the Theory Of Evolution!
Surely it will go down in history as the most tragi-
comical ideological anomaly of all time. It is
also the only religious cult still doggedly trying to
convince the world that ugly frogs can turn into
handsome princes ... if one waits long enough! If
Evolution were true, why does it need the energy
and intelligence of people to defend itself and
perpetuate the Theory? Why does Mother Nature
simply not write and publish her own pro-
evolution propaganda ... brainlessly,
purposelessly and randomly?
1.2 Survival Of The Fittest. The term 'Survival
Of The Fittest' is a perfectly useless tautology
(reasoning in circles!): “Why did the Panda
survive? ... Because it's the fittest! ... Why is it
the fittest? ... Because it survived!” (They call this
Natural Science?).
1.3 Evolution Is Impossible For A Number Of
Reasons.
(a) Mathematics & Probability. The
mathematicians have, as far back as the 1966
Wistar Symposium (USA), already told the
Evolutionists that Evolution is mathematically
not feasible. The chances for Evolution are, in
terms of mathematical probability, so remote as
to be virtually non-existent. Yes, you've got to
have a lot of faith to be an Evolutionist!
(b) Discovery Of DNA. The discovery of DNA
has rendered the Evolutionary Theory totally
defunct. Scientists working with DNA everyday
of their lives will tell you that the (encoded) DNA
has a built-in firewall (security code) that will not
allow Evolution across species.
(c) Biogenesis. Biogenesis means only a Living
Cell can give rise to another Living Cell. Life
cannot evolve from Non-Life.
(d) The First Law Of Thermodynamics. The
'First Law Of Thermodynamics' states that
Energy & Matter (sister-phenomena) can be
neither created nor destroyed. No one can add
to or take away from the total portfolio of
Energy & Matter available in the Universe. We
may harness and manipulate it, but that's all.
Now, if Energy & Matter cannot be created or
destroyed, how then did Evolutionary Theory not
only (i) 'create' Nature out of the raw materials
at the time, but also (ii) first 'create' those very
raw materials apparently out of nothing? How
did the Evolutionary Theory abrogate/override
(c) First Civilisations? Where are the proofs of
(e) The Second Law Of Thermodynamics. The
'Second Law Of Thermodynamics' states that the
Universe is running down ... time's arrow points
downwards. There is a 'Law Of Decay And
Death' at work in Nature, and nothing we do can
stop it. We may delay the process perhaps by
greasing, lubricating and cleaning things, but
ultimately everything dies and turns to dust. This
'Law' states that random events (such as
Evolution) cannot lead to Order out of Chaos
(low entropy) but always to Chaos out of Order
(high entropy). That is why a career built on
random events (such as institutionalised
gambling or 'luck') will fail dismally. The hopes,
dreams and illusions behind Evolutionary Theory
is built on the same hopeless mathematical
probabilities as the natural laws governing
gambling and betting. Evolution, if it were true,
will have relied solely on 'luck'.
(f) The Universe Is Running Down. The
Universe, like a huge old grandfather-clock, is
winding down ... it too must, eventually, stop
ticking, decay and die. But then, Who wound it
up in the first place? Thus, the very existence of
'The Second Law Of Thermodynamics' demands
the existence of a Creator, an Intelligent First
Cause. The 'First And Second Laws Of
Thermodynamics' stand unchallenged in the
world of physics ... it is only Evolutionists who
propose to override the natural laws of the
Universe with such non-chalant impunity.
(g) Irreducible Complexity. The principle of
'Irreducible Complexity prohibits Evolution from
ever taking place. For instance, how long can
any living organism, 'evolving' over many
'millions of years', afford to wait for its blood to
learn to clot ... musn't blood be able to clot
instantly within a matter of minutes for a living
organism to survive?
(h) Charles Darwin, the father of 'Evolution' in
his younger days, ultimately realised the lack of
evidence for his evolutionary speculation and
wrote: 'In terms of thus theory an innumerable quantity of
transitional, intermediary forms must have existed ... but
why do we not find them in the crust of the earth? Why is
Nature not in total confusion instead of the clearly
recognisable, delineated species as we can see?' ” [H. Enoch,
'Evolution Or Creation', p.139 (1968)].
(i) French Taxonomists' Society. In the early
1960's the French Taxonomists' Society (France)
decided to renounce Evolution as an unworkable
theory. These are the people who make it their
life's work to classify and categorise animals,
which means that Evolution cannot be true ... the
very fact that animals can be classified and
categorised at all makes Evolutionary Theory
fallacious. Evolutionary Theory states that all li-
with the result that (if Evolution were true) there
ought to be no distinct species in Nature at all!
Yet, everywhere we look we find only distinct,
classifiable species ... amphibians, reptiles,
mammals, birds, insects etc. (called Stasis).
1.4 Earth Is Only About 6 000 Years Old. The
Earth certainly is not '5 billion years' old. The
Evolutionists' claims on the age of the Earth are
ridiculous: (a) In 1862, Thompson said the
Earth was '20 million years' old. (b) In 1897,
Thompson doubled it to '40 million years'. (c) In
1899, Joly decided that the Earth was '90 million
years' old. (d) In 1921, Raleigh said the Earth was
'1 billion years' old. (e) In 1932, W.O. Hotchkiss
moved the figure up to '1,6 billion years'. (f) In
1947, A. Holmes declared Planet Earth to be
exactly '3,35 billion years' old but, (g) in 1956, A.
Holmes raised it to '4,5 billion years'. (h) At present,
the so-called age of the Earth stands at '4,6 - 5
billion years'! The only missing link here appears to
be a competent psychiatrist. (i) If the Earth
were really '5 billion years' old, why are the
oldest living trees (Sequoia Redwoods), the
oldest and largest coral reef (Australia's Great
Barrier Reef) and the oldest and largest desert
(Sahara) only about 4 000 years old? (Simple: A
planetwide Flood about 4 400 years ago in ±
2 348 B.C. ... a deluge with the impact of probably
millions of tsunami's or the equivalent of about 8
billion hydrogen bombs (according to geo-
physicist Walt T. Brown) would have made
survival impossible. (j) Polonium-218 Radio
Haloes. Why does Robert Gentry's research with
the Polonium-218 Radio Halo (a phenomenon
observed by geo-physicists microscopically in all
granites) show that all the granites on our planet
could only have coagulated (after its formation)
within 3 minutes, and not over 'millions' of
years? (k) Earth From Granite? If the Earth
were really formed out of redhot, molten lava
(granite), then why do geo-physicists find that,
when they melt down granite and allow it to cool
back to solids, it never cools back to solid granite
again, but to rhyolite? If the Earth were really
made from molten granite, the foundation-stone
today would have been rhyolite, not granite.
1.5 'Maropeng' ... Cradle Of Humankind? Now,
if Sterkfontein ('Maropeng') were really the
Cradle Of Humankind:
(a) Who Took The Pyramid? Where are its
great pyramids, primitive astronomical
observatories, ancient ruins, artifacts and relics?
(b) Languages & Writing Systems? Where are
the proofs of the first rudimentary languages,
judicial systems, the mathematical & writing
systems that were supposed to have evolved
there?
its first rudimentary civilisations spanning a
period of 1,75 – 3 million years? What did Mrs.
Ples and the rest of the 'Flintstones' do all the
time ... watch 'Oprah?
1.6 Evolusionists Disillusioned. Many disillu-
sioned Evolutionists, disgusted with Darwinism,
may today rightly say: (a) “If only somebody had told
us earlier that Neanderthal Man was not a robust new
species 'evolving' (going up), but, instead, a very aged,
sickly, arthritic human suffering from diabetes, Vitamin D-
deficiencies and rickets (going down)”. (b) “If only
somebody had told us that Archaeopteryx, Java Man,
Piltdown Man, Orce Man, Nebraska Man, Rhodesian Man,
Peking Man and Lucy were either fabrications or mis-
representations.” (c) “If only somebody had told us that
Taung Man, Mrs. Ples and the rest of the Australopithecines
were only apes”. (d) “If only somebody had told us that we
Evolutionists date our fossils by the strata and the strata by
our fossils” (circular reasoning!). (e) “If only somebody had
told us that the Geologic Column (Cenozoic, Mesozoic,
Paleozoic etc.) didn't really exist in Nature, but only in
textbooks, on wall-charts and in the imaginations of
Evolutionists”. (f) “If only somebody had told us that the
Coelacanth-fish (supposedly extinct for 70 million years,
until a live specimen was picked up off the coast of South
Africa on 22 December 1938) were not extinct at all!”
1.7 There Are No Transitional Fossils!
(a) Who Took The Fossil? Evolutionists cannot
produce any transitional fossils as proof of
across-species Evolution for the intermediary
stages between the distinct, major species we
encounter today ... and they have been searching
for one for over 100 years! There are an
estimated 100 million catalogued fossil-
specimens in the World (if not many more), and
not one of them is a transitional fossil. There are
probably still billions of fossils still buried in the
Karoo-formation ... if there were any transitional
fossils as required by Evolutionary Theory,
wouldn't the paleontologists have found some by
now?
(b) Sir Arthur Keith. A famous Evolutionist (Sir
Arthur Keith) concedes: “Evolution is unproved and
unprovable; the only reason we adhere to it is because the
only alternative is Special Creation, and for us that is
unthinkable.”
2. THE 'EVOLUTIONARY THEORY' IS SOSIO-
POLITICALLY DANGEROUS.
2.1 The Theory Is Virulently Racist.
(a) Darwin's Book. How many people today,
including those who helped to stablish
'Maropeng', realise that Darwin's Theory is
racist? The full title of his book, 'On The Origin
Of Species' is actually as follows:
'On The Origin Of The Species By Means Of Natural
Selection Or The Preservation Of Favoured Races In The
Struggle For Life'.
(b) Darkskinned 'Homonids'? Also, this habit of
the Evolutionists to always depict the homonids
in books as dark-skinned savages, (the more
savage the prototype, the darker the skin) is a
grave insult to the indigenous peoples of Africa,
as if they are biologically lesser 'evolved' than
'Europeans'.
2.2 The Terrible Legacy Of The 'Evolutionary
Theory'.
(a) Darwin's Racism? Following Darwin's racist
slant on the survival of 'favoured races', Evolution
today is irrevocably associated with agnosticism,
atheism, bolshevism, communism, death,
'eugenics-science', fascism, genocide, hedonism,
mass executions, nazism, occultism, racism,
reincarnation, satanism, stalinism, xenophobia
and war.
(b) Patterson And Goethe. Evolution was once
aptly described by (i) Colin Patterson (British
Museum's Paleontology Dept.) as “An Anti-Theory
producing Anti-Knowledge” and by (ii) Goethe as
“Knowledge not worth knowing”. It is the sick
brainchild of raving atheistic and racist
desperadoes living in a science-fiction world of
natural selection, mutations, the inheritance of
acquired characteristics and punctuated
equilibrium.
(c) Holocaust & Eugenics. Millions of innocents
perished in Nazi-Germany's Holocaust (during
Hitler's Eugenics-experiment) and from purges
during Stalin's Pogroms, thanks to this rabid
Evolution-madness. This fairy tale of Evolution
(where no handsome frog in his right mind will
willingly turn into an ugly, tax-paying prince) has
been delaying the progress of true Natural
Science for 150 years!
3. THE 'THEORY' IS LETHAL.
3.1 What If Christians Were Wrong About The
'Evolutionary Theory'? Well, Evolution suggests
no 'God', no Bible', no 'Moral Accountability', no
'Judgment Day' and no 'Divine Retribution'. If
Christians were wrong about Evolution (i.e. if
Evolution were true) Christians will just, as
nothing more than bio-degradable 'primates', be
absorbed organically back into Nature and re-
cycled ... there can be no remorse or regrets
where there is no 'Afterlife'.
3.2 What If Evolutionists Were Wrong About
God And Creation?
(a) Jesus Of Nazareth. Evolutionists (just like
the rest of us) will have to face Jesus Christ in
person ... not the humble carpenter from
Nazareth, but the Master of the Universe! They
may yet live to regret their error forever
(“Houston ... we've got a problem!”).
(b) What Ransom? As there is obviously no
'escape clause' in the contract, will this myth of
Evolution then really have been worth it all?
What shall those who had rejected the precious
Blood of Christ's sacrifice (for their sins at
Calvary), now in the eleventh hour of their lives
offer as ransom for their eternal souls ...
MONEY? What shall these articulate
Evolutionists say when they try, in vain, to pit
their pathetic IQ's (of between ± 70 to ± 210)
against this Intellectual Giant (Jesus) with His
unfathomable IQ of ∞ (infinity)?
4. ANATOMY OF A WORLDWIDE DELUGE
CALLED 'THE FLOOD'.
4.1 Flood Expectations? What could one have
expected from the fossil-evidence in sedimentary
strata if the Flood, and not Evolution, had caused
the rock-strata wherein fossils today are found?
The questions below (including the responses =
) demonstrate how the Flood obviously must
have, en masse, caused Worldwide fossilisation
exactly the way one would have expected it to do:
 Were animals that lived on the LOWEST
LEVELS also buried in the LOWEST STRATA? 
 Were animals from the SAME
ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY buried
TOGETHER?  years)
 Were animals with the SIMPLEST FORMS
buried FIRST? [HIDROLOGICAL FORCES
i.e. the sucking and pulling of fastmoving water
would have sorted creatures with
CORRESPONDING SHAPES].  5. THERE IS STILL HOPE!
 Were (INVERTEBRAE) SEA CREATURES
found in the LOWEST STRATA as they live at the
bottom of the sea? 
 Were the FISH found in HIGHER STRATA as
it could have escaped through water to higher
levels? 
 Were the FIRST LAND PLANTS found where
the FIRSTS AMPHIBIANS were found?  and only Son, so that whoever believes in Him, shall
 Were AMPHIBIANS and REPTILES found
buried HIGHER UP than FISHES, but LOWER
than or BELOW LAND ANIMALS; and were very
FEW LAND PLANTS and LAND ANIMALS found
in the LOWER STRATA? 
 Were ANIMALS and BIRDS in general found
on HIGHER LEVELS than REPTILES and
AMPHIBIANS? 
 Were HERD ANIMALS that may have
The Curse Of
escaped TOGETHER found TOGETHER in the
SAME STRATA?  The
 Were very FEW BIRDS found in STRATA as
they probably would have escaped to HIGHER
LEVELS? 
EVOLUTION
 Were HEAVIER, STRONGER ANIMALS
sorted SEPARATELY from WEAKER, SMALLER
Cult
ANIMALS? 
 Were very FEW PEOPLE (HUMANS) found
in STRATA? 
4.2 Study The Fossil Record. Study the fossil
record and see if the facts correspond with the
abovementioned research results.
5. DEMAND PROOF.
To prove it to yourself, demand some credible
proof for 'evolution' from the evolutionists. Ask
for evidence of the following articles or items
having made itself, i.e. a paper-airplane; an
ordinary mousetrap; a laptop-computer; a
nuclear-plant and a solar system. How long did
“Scat ... all of you! According to
it take? (Please write in the figures in the spaces
Evolutionary Theory distinct, identifiable
provided below).
species do not exist!”
Paper Airplane: □□□□□□□ (in Millions of years)
Mousetrap: □□□□□□□ (in Billions of years)
Laptop Computer: □□□□□□□ (in Trillions of
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Nuclear Plant: □□□□□□□ (in Quadrillions of
'The Holy Bible' (NIV & KJV)
years)
Solar System: □□□□□□□ ( in Mega-zillions of Sources & Illustration: Vance Ferrell BA,
years) MA, BD: 'Science vs. Evolution', & 'The
Evolution Handbook', Evolution Facts
Inc. (2001)
5.1 Jesus Christ Or Charles Darwin? If you
had, upon your deathbed, a choice between Jesus Contact Us For Our Pamphlet
Christ and Charles Darwin for a last-minute On How To Print And Distribute
conversation to discuss eternal-issues ... which These Christian Tracts From
one would you choose? 5.2 It Is Safer To Trust Home.
In Jesus Christ. The problem is that no
guarantees exist for the luxury of a deathbed.
Jesus has said:
“For God so loved the world, that He gave His one
© P.J. Stassen 2007
not perish but have Eternal Life” (John 3:16 NIV). “Though
your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as EvangelismRSA
snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be P.O. Box/Posbus 14492 Sinoville 0129 Pretoria RSA
Cell/Sel 072 237 5793
like wool” (Isaiah 1:18b NIV). “And the blood of Jesus
Christ His Son cleanseth us from all sin.” (1 John 1:7b
KJV).