Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MICROECONOMICS NOTES
Based on Hal Varian: Intermediate Microeconomics
Peter C. May
Economics & Management
Worcester College, Oxford
-2-
- Optimization Principle: People try to choose the best patterns of consumption that
they can afford
- Equilibrium Principle: Prices adjust until the amount that people demand of
something is equal to the amount that is supplied
- Exogenous Variable: Determined outside the model; assumed to be fixed
- Endogenous Variable: Determined within the model
- Heterogeneity: Differences between individuals, not everyone the same; opposite to
homogeneity
- Reservation Price: A person’s maximum willingness to pay for something, i.e. the
price at which the consumer is just indifferent between purchasing or not purchasing
the product
- Demand Curve: Measures how much people wish to demand/consume at each price
- Supply Curve: Measures how much people wish to supply/produce at each price
- Equilibrium Price: Where demand = supply; imbalances are unsustainable
o If qD>qS → excess demand, price will go up!
o If qD<qS → excess supply, price will go down!
- Pareto Efficiency: Situation when there is no way to make some group of people
better off without making some other group worse off
- Underlying principle: “Consumers choose the best bundle of goods they can afford”
- Budget set: Consists of all bundle goods that the consumer can afford at the given
prices and income → affordable consumption bundles, e.g. p1x1 + p2x2 ≤ m
- Budget line: The set of bundles that cost exactly m, e.g. p1x1 + p2x2 = m
- Good 2 can represent a composite good that stands for everything else that the
consumer might want to consume other than good 1
x2
Vertical Rearranging budget line:
intercept
= m/p2 x2 = m/p2 – p1/p2 × x1
Budget Line:
Slope: - p1/p2
→ Budget Set
- Numeraire price: when we set one of the prices to 1; numeraire good: good whose
price has been set equal to one
- Quantity tax: To pay a fixed amount per unit → In QS equation: p changes to (p−t)
- Value/ad valorem tax: Percentage tax → In QS equation: p changes to p×(1−t)
- Lump sum tax: Fixed amount independent of units
C3: PREFERENCES
x2
In this case the consumer would be
C indifferent between A and C, as well
as A and B, and therefore
B indifferent between B and C. BUT
A
C must be strictly preferred to B
x1
- Examples of preferences:
1. PERFECT SUBSTITUTES
Two goods are perfect substitutes if the consumer is wiling to
substitute one good for the other at a constant rate → e.g. consumer
only cares about the total number of pencils, not about their colours
IC: Straight lines
2. PERFECT COMPLEMENTS
Goods that are always consumed together, e.g. right shoes and left
shoes → Consumer always wants to consume the goods in fixed
proportions to each other (not necessarily one-to-one)
IC: L-shaped
3. BADS
Commodity that the consumer doesn’t like, i.e. from which he gets
negative utility
-4-
C4: UTILITY
- Monotonic transformations don’t change the MRS because the MRS is measured along
an indifference curve, and utility remains constant along an indifference curve
Mathematical Appendix
"u(x1, x 2 ) "u(x1, x 2 )
du = dx1 + dx 2 = 0
"x1 "x 2
"u(x1, x 2 )
dx 2 "x1 MU1
MRS = =# =#
dx1 "u(x1, x 2 ) MU 2
"x 2
C5: CHOICE
!
- Underlying principle: “Consumers choose the best bundle of goods they can afford”
→ “Consumers choose the most preferred bundle from their budget sets”
- Optimal choice of the consumer is that bundle in the consumer’s budget set that lies
on the highest indifference curve
- The optimal consumption position is where the indifference curve is tangent to the
budget line
x2
x2 *
x1 * x1
- 3 exceptions:
a) Indifference curve might not have a tangent line, e.g. when there is a kink at
the optimal choice
b) If budget constraint is kinked and convex, there might be more than one
optimum
c) When there is a boundary optimum (consuming 0 of one good)
- BUT: tangency condition is sufficient if preferences are strictly convex
- Tangency condition: Slope of indifference curve = slope of budget line
p
MRS = " 1
p2
- If everyone faces the same prices for two goods, then everyone will have the same
MRS, and will thus be willing to trade off the two goods in the same way
C6: DEMAND
x1
- Engel Curves:
m
x1
- Luxury good: Demand increases by a greater proportion than income
- Necessary good: Demand increases by a smaller proportion than income
- Homothetic preferences: Preferences only depend on the ratio of good 1 to good 2
→ consumer prefers (tx1, tx2) to (ty1, ty2) for any positive value of t
- If preferences are homothetic, then the income offer curves are straight lines through
the origin
- Ordinary good: Demand increases when the price decreases Δx1/Δp1 < 0 → demand
curve slopes downwards
- Giffen good: Demand increases when the price increases Δx1/Δp1 > 0 → demand
curve slopes upwards
- Price offer curve: Connecting the optimal points when let p1 change while we hold p2
constant
- Demand curve: How demand for a good changes as we change its price → plot of the
demand function x1(p1, p2, m) while holding p2 and m fixed
-7-
x2
x1
- Demand Curves:
p1
x1
- Substitutes: Goods that, to some degree, substitute for each other, e.g. pens and
pencils → Δx1/Δp2 > 0
- Complements: Goods that tend to be consumed together, albeit not always, e.g. shoes
and socks → Δx1/Δp2 < 0
- Inverse demand function PD(Q): Measures the price at which a given quantity will be
demanded
- The height of the demand curve at a given level of consumption measures the marginal
willingness to pay for an additional unit of the good at that consumption level;
p1=p2×|MRS|
- Principle of Revealed Preference: Let (x1, x2) be the chosen bundle when prices are
(p1, p2), and let (y1, y2) be some other bundle such that p1x1 + p2x2 ≥ p1y1 + p2y2 → (x1,
x2) f (y1, y2)
x2
Y
x1
- Indirectly Revealed Preferences: (Transitivity assumption) → If we know that (x1, x2) is
directly revealed preferred to (y1, y2), and (y1, y2) is directly revealed preferred to (z1, z2),
then we can conclude that (x1, x2) is indirectly revealed preferred to (z1, z2)!
-8-
Slutsky
- Graphically: First pivot the budget line around the original demanded bundle and then
shift the pivoted line out to the new demanded bundle
Equations of Lines:
1) Original BC: pxx + pyy = m
→ (x*, y*)
C
2) Pivoted Line: pxx + 0.5pyy = pxx* + 0.5pyy*
2y*
3) Final BC: pxx + 0.5pyy = m
Income
Effect B
ySS
Substitution
Effect y* A
- Mathematical Description:
Substitution Effect " #x1s = x1 ( p1$, m$) % x1 ( p1,m), m$ = m + x1#p1
Income Effect " #x1n = x1 ( p1$,m) % x1 ( p1$, m$)
Total Change " #x1 = #x1s + #x1n
Substituting #x1m = %#x1n
#x1 = #x1s % #x1m
#x1 #x1s #x1m
= %
#p1 #p1 #p1
!
-9-
- Normal goods: Income effect works in the same direction as substitution effect
- Giffen goods: Income effect works in the opposite direction as substitution effect, and
! outweighs it
Hicks
- Graphically: Adjust budget constraint to new prices and find the point where it is
tangent to the original indifference curve
C
2y
Income *
Effect
ySH B
Substitution
Effect y* A
- The Law of Demand: If the demand for a good increases when income increases,
then the demand for that good must decreases when its price increases! → normal
goods must have downward sloping demand curves
- 10 -
- Assumptions: non-labour ! income (M), consumption (C), wage rate (w), price level (p)
and labour in hours (L):
pC = M + wL
pC – wL = M
pC + w(LMAX – L) = M + wLMAX
- Leisure (R): R = LMAX – L and the endowments RE = LMAX and CE = M/p, thus M =
pCE:
pC + wR = pCE + wRE
→ Endowment BC with p1 = p, p2 = w, x1 = C, x2 = R, 1 ω1= CE, ω2 = RE
- Slutsky Decomposition for the effect on leisure R of an increase in wage w:
!R !R S !R M
= + ( R E # R) "
!w !w !m
(?) = (– ) + (–) × (+) [assuming leisure is a normal good]
o When Substitution Effect > Total Income Effect → Total effect negative
(leisure decreases and labour increases as the wage rate increases)
o When Total Income Effect > Substitution Effect → Total effect positive
(leisure increases and labour decreases as the wage rate increases)
RESULT: Backward-bending labour supply curve!
P
Supply curve
GREEN AREA –
Consumers’ surplus
BLUE AREA –
P* Producers’ surplus
Demand curve
Q* Q
- The change in consumers’ surplus associated with a price change has a roughly
trapezoidal shape → change in utility associated with the price change
- 2 more ways to measure the monetary impact of a price change on consumer:
a) Compensating Variation – How much money would you have to
give the consumer after the price change to make him just as well
off as before the price change
b) Equivalent Variation – How much money would you have to take
away from the consumer before the price change to make him just
as well off as after the price change
x2 COMPENSATING x2 EQUIVALENT
VARIATION VARIATION
CV
EV
x1 x1
*CV & EV negative in this case
- 12 -
∞
elastic
1
inelastic
0
Q
- Elasticity and Marginal Revenue:
!
- 13 -
- Linear demand curve: MR has the same y-intercept and is twice as steep (MR=a-bq)
- Another expression for elasticity, e.g. PED:
d ln x1
"x1 , p1 =
d ln p1
C16: EQUILIBRIUM
!
- Equilibrium Price: D(p*)=S(p*)
- With tax: PS=PD – t → D(PD)=D(PS)
- Deadweight Loss of a Tax: Net loss in consumers’ surplus plus producers’ surplus that
arises from imposing the tax → measures the value of the output that is not sold due
to the presence of the tax
P Supply + tax
Demand
Q
- Pareto Efficiency: No way to make any person better off without hurting anybody
else
- Pareto efficient amount of output to supply in a single market is that amount where
demand and supply curves cross → only point where the amount that demanders are
willing to pay for an extra unit of output equals the price at which suppliers are willing
to supply an extra unit of output
C18: TECHNOLOGY
o CONVEX: if you have two ways to produce y units of output, (x1, x2) and (z1, z2),
then their weighted average will produce at least y units of output
- Marginal product MP1(x1, x2): The extra output per extra unit of an input, holding all
other inputs fixed
"f (x1, x 2 )
→ MP1 = #0
"x1
- Diminishing marginal product: We typically assume that the total output will go up
at a decreasing rate as we increase the amount of only one factor, holding all others
equal
! - Technical Rate of Substitution TRS(x1, x2): (=MRTS) How much extra of factor 2
you need if you give up a little of factor 1 → Measures the slope of an isoquant
MP1
→ TRS = "
MP2
e.g. Y(L, K) → TRS=−MPL/MPK
- Diminishing TRS: As we increase the amount of factor 1, and adjust factor 2 so as to
stay on the same isoquant, the TRS declines → Convexity
! - 2 time periods:
o Short run: Time period where at least one input is fixed (e.g. fixed amount of
land)
o Long run: All the factors of production can be varied
- Returns to scale: The factor by which output changes as we change the scale of
production (e.g. multiply all inputs by a constant factor)
o CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE: ƒ(tx1, tx2) = tƒ(x1, x2)
o DECREASING RETURNS TO SCALE: ƒ(tx1, tx2) < tƒ(x1, x2)
o INCREASING RETURNS TO SCALE: ƒ(tx1, tx2) > tƒ(x1, x2)
pMP1 = #1
→ The value of the marginal product of a factor should equal its price
!
- 15 -
x1 *
x1
- The firm chooses the input and output combination that lies on the highest isoprofit
line (tangency condition: MP1=ω1/p)
! Long-run profit maximization:
max pf (x1, x 2 ) " #1 x1 " # 2 x 2
x1 ,x 2
pMP1 = "1
pMP2 = " 2
!
→ Factor demand curves: measure the relationship between the price of a factor and the
profit maximizing choice of that factor
!
- Inverse factor demand curve: Measures the price of a factor for some for some given
quantity of inputs to be demanded
ω1
x1
- Implication: Each factor demand function must be a decreasing function of its price
- If pMP1>ω1 → firm should increase factor 1; if pMP1<ω1 → firm should decrease
factor 1
- Important relationship between competitive profit maximization and returns to scale:
o If the firm’s production function exhibits constant returns to scale and the firm
is making positive profits in equilibrium, then doubling the outputs would
double profits → contradict the assumption that previous output was profit-
maximizing
o RESULT: If a competitive firm exhibits constant returns to scale, then its long-
run maximum profits must be zero!
- 16 -
y
y’
y* If the output price increases, the isoprofit lines
become flatter (since slope = ω1/p) → increase in
supply from y* to y’
x1 * x1
→ The supply function of a competitive firm must be an increasing function of the
price of output (upward sloping supply curve!)
- Cost function: C(ω1, ω2, y) → measures the minimum costs of producing a given level
of output at given factor prices
- Isocost lines: Every point on an isocost curve has the same cost (C)
C = "1 x1 + " 2 x 2
C "1
x2 = # x1
"2 "2
- Cost-minimization problem: Find the point on the isoquant that has the lowest
possible isocost line associated with it:
! x2
OPTIMAL
CHOICE
Isocost lines
Slope=-ω1/ω2
Isoquant
ƒ(x1, x2)=y
x1
- Tangency condition: Slope of production isoquant = slope of isocost lines:
MP1 #
" = TRS = " 1
MP2 #2
- Conditional Factor Demands (or derived factor demands): x1(ω1, ω2, y) using the
equation above → measure the relationship between the prices and of output and the
! factor choice of the firm conditional on the firm producing a given level of
optimal
output y (in short: give the cost-minimizing choices for a given level of output)
→ always downward sloping (Δω1Δx1≤0)
- Average cost function: cost per unit to produce y units of output (AC=C(ω1, ω2, y)/y
- Relationship between returns to scale and cost function:
- 17 -
!
- 18 -
MC
Costs AC
AVC
Q
- The area under the MC curve = Total Variable Costs!
y
" 0
MC(y)dy = TVC(y) = CV (y)
MC
Costs
Q
- The optimal division of output between two plants must have the MC of producing
output at plant 1 = MC of producing output at plant 2
→ MCP1=MCP2
- Long run cost function = Short run cost function adjusted to/evaluated at the optimal
choice of the fixed factors: C(y)=cS(y, k(y))
- Firm must be able to do at least as well by adjusting plant size as by having it fixed:
C(y)≤cS(y, k*)
- At y*: C(y*)=cS(y*, k*) → optimal choice of plant size is k*
- HENCE: short run average cost curve must be TANGENT to the long run average cost
curve!
- Thus, the LAC is the lower envelope of the SAC:
Costs
SACs
LAC
Q
- 19 -
- Relationship between long-run and short-run marginal costs with continuous levels of
the fixed factor:
Costs SAC
SMC LMC
LAC
y*
Q
- Firm faces:
a) Technological constraints (production function)
b) Economic constraints (cost function)
- Perfect competition: Market structure with many small firms producing a
homogeneous product → firm = PRICE TAKER: price independent of own level of
output; HOMOGENEOUS PRODUCT: Regardless of the number of firms in the market, if
consumers are well informed about prices, the only equilibrium price is the lowest price
offered
- Demand curve faced by a competitive firm:
P
Demand Curve:
• 0 above p*
• Horizontal at p*
• Entire market demand curve below p*
p*
Q
- In a perfectly competitive industry, supply decision: p=MC(y); MC curve of a
competitive firm is precisely its supply curve
- Two exceptions:
o When there are two levels of output where p=MC, the profit-maximizing
quantity supplied can lie only on the upward sloping part of the MC curve
o Shutdown-condition – Firm is better off going out of business when:
CV (y)
"F > # = py " CV (y) " F → = AVC > p
y
- IN THE SHORT RUN: The supply curve is the upward sloping part of the MC curve that
lies above
! the AVC curve
!
- 20 -
MC
Costs AC
Supply Curve:
AVC • 0 below p=AVC
• Horizontal at p=AVC
• MC curve above p=AVC
p=AVC
Q
- Profits: Difference between total revenue and total costs
→ Π(y) = y×p(y) − y×AC(y) = y×(p(y) − AC(y)) or Π(y) = py − cV(y) − F
- Producer’s surplus: Profits + Fixed costs → PS = py − cV(y) = Π(y) + F
- 3 ways to measure PS:
1) Total Revenue – Total Variable Costs
2) Area above the MC curve and below the price
3) Area to the left of the supply curve
1) Total Revenue – Total Variable Costs: 2) Area above MC Curve and below Price
MC MC
P AC
P AC
AVC AVC
p* p*
q* Q q* Q
3) Area to the left of the supply curve
MC
P AC
AVC
p*
q* Q
- Long Run supply curve: p = MCl(y) = MC(y, k(y))
→ In contrast: Short run supply curve p = MCS(y) = MC(y, k) involves holding k fixed!
- Typically, long run supply curve will be more elastic than short run supply curve
- Shutdown condition in the long-run: p ≥ AC(y) → LRS curve is the upward sloping
part of the long run marginal cost curve that lies above the LRAC (not LRAVC)!
- 21 -
- If constant returns to scale → LRS curve: horizontal line at cmin, level of constant AC!
- Long run cases:
o If constant AC with or without free entry: LRS curve flat, profit = 0, number
of firms indeterminate
o Increasing AC: a) restricted entry – LRS curve slopes up, positive accounting
profits but 0 economic profit; or b) free entry – infinite number of firms
producing infinitesimal output (implausible)
o Decreasing AC: incompatible with perfect competition
o U-shaped AC: a) restricted entry – like SR situation, profits can persist; or b)
free entry – profits driven down to a minimal level, if market large relative to
firms within it the LR industry supply curve is almost flat
n
- Industry supply curve = sum of individual demand curves: S( p) = " Si ( p)
i=1
P S1
S2 → Horizontal addition
S1+S2 ! KINKED
Example:
If S1(p)=p−10 and S2(p)=p−15
→ p1(q)=q+10, p2(q)=q+15, by
drawing we can see that kink at p=15
Q
- Short run industry equilibrium:
If p* = AC → 0 profits
If p* < AC → negative profits (loss)
If p* > AC → positive profits
- Long run industry equilibrium (given free entry & exit)
If positive profits made in the short run, new firms will enter, driving
down prices until p* = AC → 0 profits
If negative profits made in the short run, some firms will exit, so prices
rise until p* = AC → 0 profits
- If there is free entry and exit, then the long run equilibrium will involve the maximum
number of firms consistent with nonnegative profits!
- Approximate long run supply curve:
P
We can eliminate portions of the
supply curves that can never be
S1 intersections with a downward
sloping market demand curve in the
S2 S3 S4
long run → If there are a reasonable
p* number of firms in the long run, the
Approximate supply
curve p* = min(AC) equilibrium price cannot get far
from minimum average costs!
Q
- 22 -
- The more firms there are in a given industry, the flatter is the long run industry supply
curve
- HENCE, in the long run in a perfectly competitive industry without barriers to entry,
profits cannot go far from 0!
- If a firm is making positive profits, it means that people value the output of the firm
more highly than they value the inputs!
- If there are forces preventing the entry of firms into a profitable industry, the factors
that prevent entry will earn economic rents; the rent earned is determined by the price
of the output of that industry
- Economic Rent: Payments to a factor of production that are in excess of the
minimum payment necessary to have that factor supplied → Rent = p*y* − cV(y*) = PS
- Equilibrium rent will adjust to be whatever it takes to drive profits down to 0
- EXAMPLES:
o Convenience stores near the campus do not have high prices because they have
to pay high rents, but they are able to charge high prices and earn high profits,
so that landowners in turn are able to charge high rents!
o If a New York City cab operator appears to be making positive profits in the
long run after carefully accounting for the operating and labour costs, he still
does not make economic profits because he does not take into account the
price/value of the licence!
- TAXATION in the short and long run:
P SRS1
PD’’
GREEN AREA:
LRS1 Consumer tax burden
PD’ t
SRS0 RED AREA:
PS’’=PS=PD LRS0 Producer tax burden
PS’
Q
- In the short run: part of the tax burden falls on consumers, and part of the tax burden
falls on producers, BUT: in the long run, the ENTIRE tax burden falls on the consumer!
- 0 profits in the long run → industry will stop growing since there is no longer an
inducement to enter
C24: MONOPOLY
- Monopoly: When there is only one supplier in the industry → PRICE MAKER:
monopolist recognizes its influence over the market price and chooses that level of
price and output that maximized its overall profits
- Properties:
o Monopolist faces the total market demand curve, which slopes downward due
to diminishing marginal utility
o Monopolist has to take into account the effect of its changes in output on the
inframarginal units, which could have been sold at the old price
- 23 -
o Entry into the industry is completely blocked; barriers to entry can include
patents, extensive economies of scale and control over supplies or outlets
through vertical integration
- HENCE: Whilst perfectly competitive firm has the condition MR=p because it
behaves as if the impact of its output (qi) decision on price (p) was 0, a monopolist
takes into account that increasing q brings about a fall in p, hence MR<p (demand)
TR PC (y) = p " y # MR PC (y) = p
TR M (y) = p(y) " y # MR M (y) = p(y) + p$(y) " y
% 1 (
MR(y) = p(y) " '1# * + MR < p
& $(y) )
- ! Monopolist’s profit-maximization problem:
max r(y) " c(y) # optimization condition MR(y) = MC(y)
y
! & 1 ) MC(y)
MR(y) = p(y) $ (1" + = MC(y) # p(y) =
' %(y) * 1"1/ %(y)
- Mark-up Price: Compared to perfect competition, the monopolist sells its product at
a market price that is a mark-up over marginal cost:
1
! → Monopolist will never choose to operate where
1"1/ #(y) demand is inelastic (MR would be negative!)
- Market power: The more price inelastic (the closer ε(y) to -1) demand is, the greater
the mark-up on the price and the market power of the monopolist!
!
PRICE
MC
→ Deadweight Loss due
to Monopoly
pM Move from PC to M:
- Loss in CS: A+B
A B - Loss in PS: C
p*
- Gain in PS: A
C
D=AR
MR
QM Q* OUTPUT
- Monopolist produces less than the competitive amount of output (QM instead of Q*)
at a higher price (pM instead of p*) and is therefore Pareto inefficient
- Total Welfare = Consumer Surplus + Producer Surplus; maximized when p=MC, but
the monopolist produces where p>MC → DEADWEIGHT LOSS DUE TO MONOPOLY
(there are consumers who would derive benefits from the additional output that are
greater than the marginal costs of producing these units)
- Reason: Monopolist would always be ready to sell an additional unit at a lower price
than it is currently charging if it did not have to lower the price of all the other
inframarginal units that it is currently selling
- 24 -
PRICE
AC
MC
pM If a natural monopolist is
forced to operate at the
socially efficient level of
p*
output (Q*) it will make a loss
(BLUE AREA); monopolist
would make 0 profit/loss
D=AR
MR
QM Q* OUTPUT
- Monopolists have an incentive to use their market power for Price Discrimination
(charging different prices for different units/customers) in order to increase profits (by
decreasing the effect of the inframarginal units)
- 3 Types:
1) First-degree price discrimination = Perfect price discrimination: Selling each
unit of the good to the individual who values it most highly at the maximum
price this individual is willing to pay for it (at each consumer’s reservation price)
→ Entire CS is shifted to PS!
RESULTS:
The effect on the inframarginal units disappears
Producers ends up getting the entire surplus generated in the market
Producer earns supernormal profits
Perfectly PD monopolist is Pareto efficient, producing where p=MC
DANGERS:
High-willingness-to-pay person can pretend to be the low-willingness-
to-pay-person → monopolist must be able to separate the individuals
Costs of price discriminating may be very high
X0 X1 QUANTITY
3) Third-degree price discrimination: Most common form; monopolist charges
different prices to different groups of people
- 26 -
PRICE
If the owners of the park set a price of p* per
ride, then x* rides will be demanded →
Demand curve consumer surplus = orange area and area A is
the profits earned. HOWEVER, if the owners
set the price p=MC per ride, they can then
A B increase profits by charging the entire triangle
p* (orange + A + B) as the entrance fee
MC
X* QUANTITY
PRICE
AC
3 Observations:
- Although profits are 0, the
pMC situation is still Pareto
inefficient → there is an
efficiency argument for
expanding output
- Firms will always operate to
the left of the MES
D=AR - Monopolistic competition can
result in too much or too little
product differentiation
QMC OUTPUT
- 27 -
C27: OLIGOPOLY
- Oligopoly: When few firms dominate the industry, e.g. newspaper or airline industry
- Duopoly: When there are only two suppliers
- Results:
o Firms are interdependent; a firm’s behaviour will dependent on the behaviour
of its competitors → strategic interdependence
o Each firm is a PRICE MAKERS, and also recognizes that its actions have a
noticeable effect on the prices that other firms can receive
o No single equilibrium price/quantity, but several ways to model strategic
interdependence
- 5 ways:
o Sequential:
Stackelberg Duopoly/Quantity leadership – Sequential quantity
setting
Price leadership – Sequential price setting
o Simultaneous:
Cournot Duopoly – Simultaneous quantity setting
Bertrand Duopoly – Simultaneous price setting
o Cartel
Stackelberg Duopoly
- Sequential quantity setting:
o Follower maximizes profits by setting its quantity in terms of unknown
quantity of leader
o Then, the leader maximizes its profits taking into account the decision of the
follower
→ Asymmetric: one firm is able to make its decision before the other firm!
- Reaction function: Tells us how each firm will react to the other’s choice of output,
e.g. y2=f2(y1)
X2
Reaction curve of Knowing the reaction curve
Firm 1 (leader) of the follower (blue line), the
leader will choose the output
on the highest isoprofit line
Reaction curve of on his reaction curve → QL
Firm 2 (follower) and QM
QF
Isoprofit
lines
QL X1
Output if firm 1
was a monopolist
- 28 -
MR of leader
QL QT QUANTITY
Cournot Duopoly
- Simultaneous quantity setting:
o Two firms are simultaneously trying to decide what quantity to produce
o Equilibrium: Situation where each firm finds its beliefs about the other firm to
be confirmed; each firm optimally chooses to produce the amount of output
that the other firm expects it to produce
o Reaction functions: y1 = ƒ1(y2e) and y2 = ƒ2(y1e)
X2
QC X1
- 29 -
- If both firms have identical, constant marginal costs (c), then we can mathematically
deduce:
Y = y1 + y 2
% s (
MR1 (y1 ) = p(Y ) " '1# 1 * = MC = c Cournot duopolists sell at a lower
& $(y1 ) )
price and therefore, the sum of
c their individual outputs is greater
p(Y ) = if si = 0.5
1# si / $(y i ) than the output of a monopolist
→ smaller deadweight loss!
c c
p(Y ) = <
1#1/2 " $(y i ) 1#1/ $(y i )
- If more than 2 firms: each firm has a small market share → price will be very close to
MC (industry will be nearly competitive)
! Duopoly
Bertrand
- Simultaneous price setting:
o Both firms are setting the prices and letting the market determine the quantity
sold
o At any price above p=MC, each firm has an incentive to offer a price just
below its competitor, thereby getting the total market demand and earning
higher supernormal profits!
o Graphically:
PRICE PRICE
p0
p1
MC MC
D D
- If both firms offer a price p0, each one produces Q0/2 and firm 1 makes profits
represented by the red box. However, it has an incentive to offer a price just below p0,
e.g. p1, getting the total market demand and increasing profits to the blue box → Only
equilibrium where p=MC!
Cartel
- A cartel consists of a number of firms colluding to restrict output and maximize
industry profit (e.g. OPEC) → behave like a monopolist
- If collusion is possible, the firms do better to choose the output that maximizes total
industry profits and then divide up the profits among themselves
- 30 -
PRICE
Reaction curve of Cartel will produce
Firm 1 (leader) somewhere along the red
dotted line!
Reaction curve of
Firm 2 (follower)
QUANTITY
Mathematically:
max p(y1 + y 2 ) " [ y1 + y 2 ] # c1 (y1 ) # c 2 (y 2 )
y1 ,y 2
$p(y1 + y 2 ) $p(y1 + y 2 )
y2 + y1 + p(y1 + y 2 ) # MC1 (y1 ) = 0
$y1 $y1
$p(y1 + y 2 ) $p(y1 + y 2 )
y1 + y 2 + p(y1 + y 2 ) # MC2 (y 2 ) = 0
$y 2 $y 2
% MC1 (y1 ) = MC2 (y 2 )
- HENCE: the two marginal costs will be equal in equilibrium; if one firm has a cost
advantage, it will necessarily produce more than the other in equilibrium!
- A cartel will typically be unstable in the sense that each firm will be tempted to sell
! more than it has agreed upon if it believes that the other firms will not respond, i.e.
TEMPTATION TO CHEAT → need for punishment strategy!
"1 (y1 ) = p(y1 + y 2 ) # y1 $ c1 (y1 )
%"1 %p(y1 + y 2 )
= p(y1 + y 2 ) + y1 $ MC1 (y1 )
%y1 %y1
%"1 %p(y1 + y 2 ) %" %p(y1 + y 2 ) %p(y1 + y 2 )
+ y1 = 0 & 1 = $ y1 where y1 < 0
%y1 %y1 %y1 %y1 %y1
%"
& 1 >0
%y1
- THUS: if firm 1 believes that firm 2 will keep its output fixed, then it will believe that it
can increase profits by increasing its own production!
- Example for punishment strategy: “If I discover you cheating by producing more that your
! amount, I will punish you by producing the Cournot level of output forever”
o Present value of cartel behaviour: Πm+Πm/r
o Present value of cheating: Πd + Πc/r, where Πd = profit from cheating (only
once)
→ Strategy useful if present value of cartel behaviour > present value of cheating
" " " $ "c
"m + m > "d + c # r < m >0
r r "d $ "m
RESULT: As long as interest rate (r) is sufficiently small, i.e. the prospect of future
punishment is sufficiently important, it will pay the firms to stick to their quotas
!
- 31 -
C31: EXHANGE
- Partial equilibrium analysis: How demand and supply are affected by the price of a
particular good
- General equilibrium analysis: How demand and supply conditions in several markets
determine the prices of several goods
o Simplest model: Pure exchange economy
- Assumptions for pure exchange economy:
1) Competitive markets → Producers & Consumers = Price takers
2) 2 goods, 2 consumers
3) 2 stages:
a. Start with fixed endowments
b. Trade; no production involved → quantities supplied = fixed
Edgeworth Box
- Allows us to depict the endowments, possible allocations and preferences of 2
consumers in one diagram
- Feasible allocation: When total amount consumed = total amount available
x 1A + x 2A = "1A + "2A
x 1B + x 2B = "1B + "2B
ω2A ω2B
Endowment
GOOD 2
Person
A x1 A ω1A
GOOD 1