You are on page 1of 11

c 

 

÷  

 

use
 
 apply

     
P.4


 

  

it͛s what you do with the questions you encounter on the
exam. P.5


  

 
  ambiguity

  


!p Ôndergraduate exams and information dump÷ 


 "   

 

       
 
 


 


 
  
 apply

  #


 $
know the
issues. P.7-8
›p %%

  
  
 
 building


    P.5
&!p xaw school rumors:'  

    & (     

 ÷    P.8-10
›p ëpot the Issues)
    
  
›p ÿrasping the Fundamentals of the Course: -
     
   

 
    


 
  *


 !
›p IRAC Method
    
  
 #+÷  

 
·p  Î
 
  

 

  
 
·p 'Î,%-#%


 
 
 

ap , $ 
   
·p - Î. 
 

  

 
 





·p )   Î" 
  /


    
 
 
 
    

  
 
  
(!p ëocratic Method Problem; The Rulebook vs. The xoose Cannon:0


 


 
" 
 
    
   

  
 

      
   
P.11-17
›p The Rulebook: ÷  

   
1÷ 
 2
÷  


 3

     % 
 



 
    


*
  

 !
 
 

›p The Judge as a xoose Cannon4    
     
  
        
 

 
 "





   

  
 


›p ëimultaneous" 

 

  %
  


 


    

    

©   

c    


  

÷ % 
 
 

 
 

 
   

 
  P.21

   $
1  
 2
 
  
 


 P.21-2

15  
 6
 2  
 
7  


 

 


 
   
  ÷  
 
 
 

   '

 
7  1  
32 P.22-
3

÷ 
  
  



 

 1 

2P.23-4

#        



    
 
 
 

 


  ÷   

  



 P.24

÷MOëT important  


  
  
   P. 25

c  c 
 

-p Patterns

- 
!p ÷
 ' 0 '
p   
 
 



  


 
 ÷-

 
  

3
P. 29
&!p ,
"
   
  
p ,
$ 
   

     
  
   

$ 
  
 %  
''
  

  

 
 
   

   
 %
P. 30
(!p )  "



p ,   
)  "


    
 
"

 
 


  -
   
    
  
 
8 1   2  



  
 

P. 31-2
7p †ow ©   ÷
' ) 
3'
!p  
   

  
  


 
 
9
 
 

 P. 32


&!p %
   
 

 

     
 
 


 
3 issue spotting pointsP. 33
(!p 
  


        
÷

 


 




  P. 33-5
a.p Ônintended or Imaginary Jurisdiction
p ©  

 

 
3
  


b.p Jurisdiction whose law was explored in course
p ÷  

    

   1

  
2 1 $ 
   
2
  $ 
  
p  $ 
   
 

   
 

 
:  
 9 
    
 

  
 




p Traditional vs. Modern Rule, where Modern Rule has not been judicially adopted
p 0 

   0    
 

  
  
 
  $ 
    
  


p ÷'

 
 
p #+÷



&p  #+÷
 
 

 

    
 
À p © ;;;;;;
p   
$ 
 

 
  
 


p   


    
 

 
  
  


c À 
 c 


 

÷      

  
  #   

  <
÷common definition      
   
reasons 
  
 
 ÷  statutory ambiguity
 

 

  P. 37-8

-p Patterns - 


P. 39
!p ©0 ©    P. 39
p 0
 

 
       language purpose
p ©0*! 
 <
p © ÷   
   

 
 
p "  + 
  



"      


p © %
     
 


1
2
p © %
           
&!p      <P. 40-1
p xegislative Intent=


 

  *   


 ! 
   
p  
5
 + 
  

 

 
 
 
   
 

  

p 1#  2 

 
   


  

 

  
p +
©     "



p ©       
     
 
 

 
p +) 
8  


  
1  
2
p   

 

1
     
 2
p ' )

 




p 1# > 2 





$  



   



   
  
p Policy Analysis='
)
 ?P. 42-3
(!p ©     


 - 

a.p Competing Purposes P. 43-6
p 0
  
  
 



 



  
 
÷  
   
 @
p ÷   
   
    
 
      
÷
  

   
p , 
 

   
   
  
 
 
p The Pattern of Conflict: Broad vs. Narrow PurposesP. 46-7
   




  


  
   

      ÷  


    
p ëpin vs. Counter-ëpin
p " 
  
  


  

 
 
   

p )    


   1   
 
  2
   1



  $
2
p Floodlight vs. xaser Beam
p 7   
  

 



   
 
 


p 1#  2 "

   
  
  

 
 "

  1




 2


 
       
A!p  "  "


 - 
) 
0 P. 48-51
÷  
 
  

 
 
 B
  + ,
  
p The Dictionary of ëtatutory Context
p ÷ 
 
  
 





 
 
p The Dictionary of †istory
p ÷    
    
  
 
p %   &?&?   
 
  

   


 12
p The Dictionary of Commercial Context
p ) 
 
 


 

  
   

  




  





     
p  

A?1 
2

"
  


   
 
 
 
    
  

p The Dictionary of the Common xaw
p "


 
  
 

  
) "


  


 +



  

  
 
p "


  
  
 
 
C!p -
"

  

- P. 52-3
a.p ariation on a †ypothetical Examined Closely in Class
p 
   
 
  
 

 
 
p New Application of an Old ëtatute
p -




     
   
 




   


  

+


3 

3  


 3   
c.p New or Imaginary ëtatute
p D
     


        
 



    
p ëtatute Making a Cameo Appearance in a Common xaw Claim
p "

  
  
) 
  






c   


 c 


 c

%   
     
 "    
 <÷  1  2
D
    $

  

   
 ÷


   P 55-6

p , 
 "" 

-  ©
p. 56-7
p 
   

  


 
 
 


    
 
, 
 
  

 Casey  
 
 *

  !
p ÷  
 
)  * 

 
 
!
p 
  
 

´p " ,

  

0,p57-9
p % 
   



   
    




    


p %    
 
p %   


!p 

   
 
     
cp ©

   




 p. 59-64
p The case says so
p ) 
 
  

 
!p Rule vs. Rationale
p ÷
      


    

  
"p xevels of generality: Narrow vs. Broad †oldings
p #    
        
 



p 7       
   



        

 
 


 


   
p %
        
  
  
p Finding the rationale in case language
p " 
   
  

   
     
    
p Multiple rationales
p ,

     


  
 

{ p A word about technique: Applying vs. extending a case
p -  

 


p %
 

  
#p ,
0
)  p 64-6
p %    
    

       
  

p +
$
) 
p 0 
  
 
 
which  

c $ 
 "

- $ 
    
 




     

 
 


 

+  
     
    

   
  


-p 5 
 1  

2 )
  0

p 68-74
  

 

  

  



  *
 
  <!

  


   

  
  

 

  

     

p ' %


 
p 0
   
  
     


      

  
p ÷ 


  

    



p %    


 

  
p "


 7  
p ÷ 


  
 



  


 


 
p 8)) 
1     2   *
!  
 

  

p 0
 
   

 

   


  
p "
)
  
p 0    9     


p )      
     

-   
 $
 
   

  
 


p %  
   
      
p ) 

p 
  
 

 

  
 


1 
2
p %  

   

  
  
p )
   % 
 ' '
.


p 0    

   

  
 
p 

 

 
  
   

p 


1


2   
 
 

 
p %   
 

  
 
 
1

2
p ÷   08÷©% 
  
     

 
p +3% 1%
2)
  
p %
  
   
 
  
    
 * #  !

   3 
  

p )  
 1 
2"  
    


 
 
 
#   

  



<
7p  )
  , 
"

÷ "   -


) 
- 
p 75-85
p -
 
   

  
p ©  

 3
  
  
 


 

  
p : 
    
 
  
 

  
&p © 
 3


  
 
  
 
 

 
+
   

     

p ÷
 
   

 
p ,
 

p -
    
   
  

 
p "   
  96  1) 
    
 
 
  
2%      

    
    

  
p ÷
 
    


  

p ,÷ -  
p "  
 
   
  
  
p #  
   

   
 

"     
 
   
 
      
 
 
   
  
       

    )  
 

 
 
p 0

     
 


p ÷ 
  
 


 


  
 

 
p :  
   
  
  


p , 
    


i.p Take things one at a time or view them as a totality
p -  

 1
  
21    
 (??21 (??
2%

 
 
 
 
  




   
&p " 
  
  


 

 
(p ÷  

 
 
 
     
   
 




ii.p xenses of generality
p 0 

      

   

&p % 
 
    
   
p   
 

 

  


    $     
  
 
<÷    


$

    *  
   


  
   

 
!
p -      


 
(p © 


 
 
  

 

   



   

 
   

 
iii.p xinguistic Ambiguity
p     
  
 
  

 
 
 and  
 
   


&p %   

 
   
(p , 
   


     
  



p  


   
 
 
 

E 
 


 meant

    


 
Ap Borderline cases
p " 
   

      
p    
   
+
 


     

   


 
p %    
 
  <: 
  

   
   
Cp aords vs. action
p +
 

   

  
p  
      
  
 $  

 *


    $   ! 
 
 
$

 
  
   ) 

  
  


 ,  
  
 
 <   


   
 
Bp aritten vs. Oral statements
p +
 
   



 

    
 


Fp xiberalism vs. reasonable expectations
p  
   



    

  

1  2
 
     

 
 

 )    



 
 : 




  



  

     



8.p Multiple sources of meaning
p ©
       




  
  


p 7  9  (

  &

c &
   %
 

0 % 


  
  
  

   
   

  -


 

 



  *3   
 !- 

1 
2 

 

   
 8
 
 

   


 
 1 

2

÷  
  
     
 

 
  

     


     

  
  

  
 
  
 <

ap :  
  


  
  
 
 
 
ap  

      
 
  *
   
  
!)       
  



ap :  




    
 


-
ap +
  
!p -  
!p 1  
 2
 

 

 
  - 
 
 *      
 
  
G!
"AC
*    
      !- 

  

  
 

    
  
!p #

 
relationships 
  
!p -  -  

  



 
     

!p     
 
   
   

 



!p -

 

    
 

&!p ' -  
!p '     
  
!p - 
  



  "&3&?  8)) 1 
2
*3  3  !
!p    3 
 

 

0
   

 

 
÷    





  1 
2

  
   
!p ÷   

    
!p ÷ 
 
 

 
!p :  


  


!p :  

  



!p ÷       
    

(!p ) 
  



   
!p - 
  $

   
 




   
!p   
   
&& 
 

 &A
!p


    
    *8))
!   * 
!
!p :  
  



    
  


!p 5    
  

!p ÷  
    

 

 

determines


 
 

* !p     


  
 

!p 
  



  
  
  


A!p © 
   
  
!p % 
 


 



 
       
!p ) 

1  
 21   
2
!p © 
 
  
   






   
!p %  
 






      



  
!p  1 
2    


 ÷
<
!p - 

   
  
<
!p ) 
  
 
 


  
  

!p ÷     

 

  
 6


 
9
  5 


  
     



 
!p ' 

 
     
   
!p "  3
 
C!p 5-  , 




!p %   
)    
   

  
 
 

!p ©3       
!p 7  
  *
 
!   





  



     
!p  

  
 





  
  
  

  
 

!p )  



 


B!p 7   
   
 
 
!p #
     
 
 
!p : 
  
 
   

 

!p : 

  
      
 
!p 7. 
!p "   
  


 


  
 
!p :