Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00339-009-5532-4
Received: 13 July 2009 / Accepted: 14 December 2009 / Published online: 22 December 2009
© Springer-Verlag 2009
Abstract Cesium metal clusters strongly affect the optical Efficiency (QE) [5]. Studies on cesium iodide films have
properties of cesium iodide thin films. The metal clusters are shown that their stability depends on the substrate on which
formed during film formation by thermal evaporation. The they are grown [6], the rate at which the films are grown [7]
cesium cluster of 30–40 nm in the matrix of cesium iodide and the method of deposition [8]. Even doped cesium iodide
insulating thin films results in Surface Plasmon Resonance composites have been studied for applications in the detec-
(SPR). The peak position of these SPR peaks showed a red tors [9–11]. Of the methods used for cesium iodide film de-
shift. This was shown to be due to changes in the dielectric position, thermal evaporation has been reported as the best.
constant of CsI resulting from the strains in the films caused Even with such potential applications, detailed characteri-
by the metal clusters themselves. zation and accumulation of data on CsI films for different
thickness is absent in the literature. With this in view, we
have studied the optical properties of thermally evaporated
1 Introduction thin films of cesium iodide for a thickness of 400–900 nm.
and oxygen peaks contributed from the substrate; it has in- of grains size as determined from AFM images with corre-
creased (proportion of these peak intensities in Fig. 2b) sug- sponding size determined from SEM micro-graphs. The lin-
gesting the dark background is thinner than regions where earity shows a correlation between the cesium iodide grain
the white grains exist. Senesi et al. [7] did not report lack size and the average grain size (considering both cesium and
of iodine in the dark background. We believe they might cesium iodide grains). Hence, we can infer the grain size of
have missed this since the films in their study were very CsI from the AFM images. Figure 3 shows that variation of
thin (∼300 nm). Hence, the amount of cesium present would the average grain size (as determined from AFM) increased
have been too small to give a strong enough signal in EDX. linearly for increasing film thickness. Using the equation of
It appears that as the film is being deposited, chemi- a least square fit line of the two figures, we have an equation
cal dissociation takes place followed by iodine sublimat- describing the variation of CsI grain size with film thickness:
ing from the film surface. Hence, the samples are multi-
phased films of CsI and Cs. However, as the film thickness CsI = 3.527T − 1416 (1)
increases, disassociation is discouraged and we successfully
where ‘T ’, is the film thickness in nm.
obtain uniform films of CsI. The whole surface is tightly
X-Ray diffraction studies showed that the films of CsI
packed with white large grains of CsI if the grown films have
grown at room temperature were polycrystalline in nature
a thickness greater than 780 nm.
without exception. The existence of cesium in elemental
Figure 1(b) and (d) shows some of the sample’s surfaces
state in the films whose thicknesses lie below 780 nm is also
as seen using the AFM. As compared to SEM, AFM shows
evident from the X-ray diffractograms of our samples shown
a larger grain density, which is uniformly distributed on the
in Fig. 4. They show a prominent broad peak at 27.5o that
surface for the same sample. Grains are even seen in the
on close examination can be deconvoluted into two peaks
SEM’s dark background regions. The disparity between the
(Fig. 4). The first deconvoluted peak matches the peak po-
two images is basically due to the difference in image for-
sition listed in ASTM Card No. 42-1245 of pure cesium
mation of the two methods. The dark contrast region of ce-
(2θ = 27.4).
sium showed no distinct morphology in SEM due to poor
X-ray diffractograms also show two other peaks of vary-
formation of secondary electrons. However, Van der Waals
ing prominence, marked as (211) and (220) in Fig. 4. These
interaction makes the granularity of this region visible in
peaks match the peak positions listed for cesium iodide in
AFM. On the other hand it is not possible to resolve which
ASTM No. 06-0311. Thus, as our morphology studies sug-
grains are of cesium metal and which are of cesium iodide.
gested, our film have two phases, namely cesium metal that
The cesium metal grains, however, seem to be smaller than
exists in tetragonal phase (a = 3.3645 Å and c = 12.552 Å)
the cesium iodide grains, since the average grain size as
and CsI in cubic phase (a = 4.568 Å). The second of the de-
determined from AFM images is smaller than that deter-
convoluted peaks can be ascribed to the (110) peak of CsI.
mined from SEM. The inset of Fig. 3 shows the variation
This peak is shifted from the 2θ = 27.59° position listed in
the ASTM card. A shift in the peak position when compared
to its position for single crystal of the sample indicates that
the crystal is in a stressed state. A displacement of the X-ray
peak to the right as compared to the peak position of single
crystal indicates a decrease in d-spacing, implying compres-
sive stress acting on the film, and vice versa the increase in
d-spacing is indicative of tensile stress. The term “residual
stress” (or simply stress) emphasizes the fact that the stress
remains after all external forces are removed. These stresses
acting in the film can cause important effects on the prop-
erties of the material. Hence, we shall try to understand the
role of stress on our samples. The stress in the film is calcu-
lated after evaluating the strain using the relation
d dobs − dASTM
= (2)
d dobs
Fig. 3 Variation of average grain size (grains of both phases, cesium
metal and cesium iodide) with film thickness. The inset shows the re- where dobs is the d-spacing measured for the thin film and
lation of grain size of cesium iodide (determined from SEM) with av- dAST M is the corresponding peak’s d-spacing of the single
erage grain size (determined from AFM), using which the variation
of cesium iodide grain size with film thickness was found to follow crystal as reported in the ASTM Card. The stress then can
3.527T − 1416, where T is the film thickness in nm be determined by multiplying the average strain d/d by
308 K. Kumar et al.
Table 1 Table compares the grain size of cesium clusters as obtained the optical properties of cesium iodide in the nanoparticle
from deconvoluted X-ray peaks, SPR peaks and the surrounding CsI
grains (from (1)) state.
References
Fig. 9 The absorbance spectra (inset) shows classical SPR peaks due 1. F. Piuz, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 433, 222 (1999)
to metal cesium clusters scattered in the films. The SPR’s peak posi- 2. E. Schyns, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 494, 441 (2002)
tion decreases linearly with increasing grain size (the grain sizes were 3. R. Gernhauser, J. Friese, J. Homolka, A. Kastenmulter, P. Kiewe,
determined using SPR peaks) H.I. Korner, P. Maier-komor, M. Peter, K. Zeitelhack, Nucl. In-
strum. Methods A 438, 104 (1999)
4. E. Nappi, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 471, 18 (2001)
Figure 9 shows the correlation of the Cs cluster size with 5. B.K. Singh, M.A. Nitti, A. Valentini, E. Nippi, C. Coluzza, G.
DiSanto, R. Zanoni, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 581, 651 (2007)
peak position. The graph shows a red shift in SPR peak posi-
6. M.A. Nitti, A. Tinti, A. Valentini, E. Nappi, P. Acquafredda,
tion with decreasing grain size. Link [14] and Liu [15] have E. Fanizza, C. Ingrosso, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A (2009).
shown that the SPR peaks of metal nanoparticles show a red doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.05.169
shift when they are embedded in a host with higher per- 7. S.G. Senesi, M.A. Nitti, A. Valentini, Microsc. Microanal. 11, 124
(2005)
mittivity. A careful examination of Fig. 9 with inferences
8. M.A. Nitti, A. Valentini, G.S. Senesi, G. Ventruti, E. Nappi, G.
of this manuscript shows that the less strained films with Casamassima, Appl. Phys. A 80, 1789 (2005)
near-cubic structure have metal nanoparticles of ∼30 nm di- 9. A.L.N. Stevels, J. Lumin. 12, 13 (1997)
ameter. However, the strained samples with tetragonal lat- 10. C.K. Ong, K.S. Song, R. Monnier, A.M. Stoneham, J. Phys. C,
Solid State Phys. 12, 4641 (1979)
tice have metal nanoparticles of ∼40 nm diameter with their 11. M.A.H. Chowdhury, D.C. Imrie, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 432,
SPR peaks at ∼300 nm. This implies that the lattice defor- 138 (1999)
mities may lead to a lowering of the dielectric constant of 12. L.-F. Lou, Introduction to Phonons and Electrons (World Scien-
the cesium iodide host. A search of the literature does not tific, Singapore, 2003), p. 138
13. B.D. Cullity, Elements of X-Ray Diffraction (Addison Wesley,
give any experimental confirmation to this idea. However, New York, 1956)
Shukla et al. [16] theoretically show that an increasing lat- 14. S. Link, M.B. Mohamed, M.A. El-Sayed, J. Phys. Chem. B 103,
tice constant of cubic CsI would result in a decreased dielec- 3073 (1999)
tric constant. These results, hence, could be useful to further 15. Z. Liu, H. Wang, H. Li, X. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1823
(1998)
theoretical investigations to understand the dependency of 16. S. Shukla, D. Kumar, N.N. Shukla, R. Prasad, J. Phys. Chem.
the crystal structure on the dielectric constant and in turn Solids 66, 1150 (2005)