DECREE OF SOVEREIGNTY

United States of America )

) SS
President of the United States .)
By the knowledge of the Writer, with the conviction of the Conscience, this Declaration admits,
as fact and truth, that, the President never dies as does not the King or Queen; neither does the
Parson, whose Office lives forever.

With the “Express Written Trust” of extant statutes and the dissolution of the states “de jure,” this
Writer’s “assumption” that all skeletal structures of corporate de facto State government are,
indeed, under “Territorial” jurisdiction and rule.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 1860, reviewing the Act of the 34 th Congress, ordered ALL the states
in existence at that time to close down all the Court’s of law and all courts complied in 1860.
None of the Court’s of any State are created by the Constitution of their State.

Every Court, from top to bottom, the justice of the peace courts, the police courts, the municipal
courts, the district courts and the circuit courts are ALL Statutory Courts created by Statutes
which were enacted by the Legislature and in fact, and law, merely Administrative Agencies and
only have the authority conferred by Statute. They are Legislative Courts, not Judicial Courts.

This action transformed the “Judicial Process” into a “Legislative Process” wherein the states of
the Union were “set-aside” and the Territorial Jurisdiction was instituted upon all the
“corporate” States of the Corporate United States.

As per referenced material found at 48 USC 1406f: “All judicial process shall run in the name of
"United States of America, scilicet, the President of the United States", and all penal or
criminal prosecutions in the local courts shall be conducted in the name of and by authority of
"the People of the Virgin Islands of the United States."

To solidify this position of, strictly, “territorial” jurisdiction, Writer makes reference to the
foundational stipulation that there shall be “One Supreme Court.” This “one” Supreme Court is
the only (available) remnant of an Article III “Judicial” Court. So, what does the Supreme Court
have to say concerning this topic of territorial jurisdiction ruled by the President of the United
States? Answer: 28 USC APPENDIX - RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT, Rule 45, Process;
Mandates -STATUTE- 1. All process of this Court issues in the name of the President of the
United States.

Now, I wonder, where did “We Thee People” and the “Republic” go?

Please be mindful that when you get to Article 10, PL 88-243, 77 Stat 630, - Construction with
other laws that you begin to see that the laws of the Republic were left in place in Section 28:10-
104; Laws not repealed. So, “with the lights on and nobody home,” the de jure system of
government, having a judicial branch, was effectively removed from the People.
The de facto, ruling “elite,” brought in all of the Uniform (Commercial) Codes through District of
Columbia; and, because all of the states are subdivisions with interlocking directorates, all are
simply municipal (territorial) corporations of D.C., and the D.C. code applies - if you are a
corporation.

How does the “court system” see this? Many illustrations could be included, but this document
does not have room. I will take only the space for one small example:

In 1976 our court system (what was left of it) was flushed away. Senate Bill 94-204 deals
with the court system and Senate Bill 94-381 deals with Public Law. These solidified changes
in all operations of law by utilizing the words "construe and construct." Slight deviations
transfer meaning of words to fit a dolus agenda.

Lawyers, judges, and the "court system" are now allowed to change any word they wish to
mean any thing they choose. The "law" now means whatever they choose it to mean. It is no
longer a court of "law," but a court of "construe and construct".

Lawyers are the guilty culprits that make these devious changes. Often their answers will
reflect such changes. They intentionally misquote past cases, or other issues, as facts by
making such changes. Illegal? Not according to the above Senate Bills.

So, be aware, "they" can construe "their" copyrighted laws any way they wish to fit the
situation for their own betterment; and, you have no say about it. Can you use the same
copyrighted codes, laws, statutes, and regulations against them? Not unless you have a
license from the BAR. You will be in violation of copyright infringement and punishment is
mandatory.

Learn this - there is NO LAW in this nation, or the world, for that matter. There is ONLY
contract. And, the only Bill of Rights the "courts" are required to take cognizance of is the
13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th.

"Judicial Notice" was commanded in the case of Hooven and Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S.
652, where the Supreme Court ruled that particular case was the last time it would address
"official definitions" of the term "United States," affirming that there are two (2) distinctly
different United States with two (2) opposite forms of governments, both having the same
congress. [“Opposite” means opposing!!]

CONCLUSION:

By the knowledge conferred within this document this Writer decrees Himself
subordinate to the Sovereign, de jure, President of the United States; but Superior to
every office de facto, including every corporate office of every “territorial” enterprise
under the de facto President of the United States as made explicit in previous and
annexed documents. Writer is Seated in Office of Parson, in parity with all other de jure
offices and makes this Decree, not of a Sovereign, but of one of the Sovereign ty of The
United States of America, de jure, a Republic.