Professional Documents
Culture Documents
According to the Wikipedia, Web analytics is the ment from marketing (Parasuraman et al., 1985; 1988)
study of online behavior in order to improve it. There to operationalize the IS service quality construct. They
are two categories; off-site and on-site web analytics. propose modification of the wording of the instrument
Off-site web analytics refers to web measurement and to better accommodate its use in the context. They
analysis irrespective of whether you own or maintain a conclude that SERVQUAL is proper to assess service
website. On-site web analytics measure a visitor's jour- quality.
ney once on your website. Web analytics is to reveal Kettinger & Lee (1997), for IS services, suggest
the knowledge hidden in the log files on one or more four dimensions of SERVQUAL, excluding tangibles
Websites. The goal is to capture, model, and analyze
out of the original five dimensions proposed by Pitt et
the behavioral patterns and profiles of users interacting
al.(1995) and Parasuraman et al. (1985; 1988) since
with a Website. Web analytics use on the secondary
web data such as Web server access logs, proxy server most IS services are requested, not by a visit to the
logs, browser logs, user profiles registration data, user department of IS, but rather by sending mail, phoning,
sessions or transactions, cookies, user queries, book- or by visiting a Web site. As a result, the tangibles of
mark data, mouse clicks and scrolls and any other gen- an IS department is not important to the user of infor-
erated by the interaction between users and the web. mation. Service quality of transactions, likewise, in in
The discovered patterns are usually represented as col- the web analytics services can be measured by four
lections of pages, objects, or resources that are fre- dimensions of SERVQUAL: (1) reliability, (2) respon-
quently accessed by groups of users with common sibility, (3) assurance, and (4) empathy.
needs or interest. Although service quality and satisfaction are closely
Up to now, many researchers have taken an interest correlated, their concepts may be clearly separated
in about web analytics. Cooley et al. (1997; 2000) do (Bitner et al., 1994). Cronin & Taylor (1992) validate
in-depth research to all the procedure of web usage that service quality is a preceding variable of satisfac-
mining. They discuss methods to pre-process the user tion from their research. As a consequence, it is possi-
log data and to separate web page references into those ble that service quality is measured by SERVQUAL,
made for navigational purposes and those made for
which has an affirmative effect on satisfaction.
content purposes. Ramli (2005) explores the use of
Web usage mining techniques to analyze web log
H-1: Service quality has an effect on service client
records collected from e-learning portal using apriori
algorithm. Drott (1998) explains the various Web serv- firm˅s satisfaction.
er logs mining methods that could be used to improve
site design. Sarukkai(2000) has discussed about link H-1a: Reliability has an effect on a service client
prediction and path analysis for better user navigations. firm˅s satisfaction.
He propose a Markov chain model to predict the user H-1b: Responsibility has an effect on service
access pattern based on the user access logs previously client firm˅s satisfaction.
collected. H-1c: Empathy has an effect on service client
firm˅s satisfaction.
2.2 Service Quality and Satisfaction H-1d: Assurance has an effect on service client
firm˅s satisfaction.
Based on an extensive series of focus group inter-
views, Parasuraman et al. (1985) argue that service
quality is founded on a comparison between what the 2.3 Satisfaction and Continuous Service Usage
customer feels should be offered and what is provided. Intention
Other marketing researchers also support the notion
that service quality is the discrepancy between custom- With respect to the cost and benefit by exit, the de-
ers' perceptions and expectations. Parasuraman and his pendency of inter-firms is related to the expected value
colleagues (Parasuraman et al., 1985; 1988) assert that which is served by the transaction partner (Lim et al.,
service quality could be assessed by measuring cus- 1995). The expected value is determined by competen-
tomers' expectations and perceptions of performance cy advantages like service quality or product quality
levels for a range of service attributes. They suggest through a comparison of existing and new channels.
SERVQUAL with five dimensions (tangibles, reliabili- Competency is defined as the particular skills and re-
ty, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy) that are sources a firm possesses, and the superior way in
which they are used (Reed & Defilippi, 1990).
used by customers when evaluating service quality,
Rusbult et al. (1982; 1988) suggest that high satis-
regardless of the type of service. In addition, Pitt et al.
faction and investment not only encourage voice and
(1995) proposed the use of the SERVQUAL instru-
2
Authorized licensed use limited to: K J Somaiya College of Engineering. Downloaded on July 29,2010 at 07:16:36 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2009
loyalty but also discourage exit and neglect. Withey & H-3: Service client firm's service usage period has an
Cooper (1989) propose that prior satisfaction is posi- effect on service client firm's continuous
tively related to voice but it is inversely related to exit. usage intention.
Ping (1993) argues that the more satisfied the more
reduced the exit. He shows that overall satisfaction is 2.5 Switching Cost and Continuous Service Usage
negatively related to exit. Thus, we can hypothesize Intention
that overall satisfaction will be positively associated
with continuous usage intention. Switching cost which occurs by changing an existing
transaction firm is one of the important factors that can
H-2: Service client firm's satisfaction has an effect on explain dependency (Weiss & Anderson, 1992).
service client firm's continuous usage intention. Switching cost includes cost of retraining personnel,
capital requirements for changeover, and costs of ac-
2.4 The Service Usage Period and Continuous quiring new ancillary equipment (Porter, 1985). If the
Service Usage Intention switching cost is, the service client firm's dependency
on its service provider will be increased.
With regard to transaction cost analysis, the switching Also, the switching cost is changed by product attri-
cost for the changing of an existing partner may be in bution, the consumer's characteristic, and the firm's
proportion to the scale of transaction-specific assets in strategy. Fornell (1992) claims that the switching cost
the view of service clients. If service client firms, in- consists of search costs, transaction costs, learning
vest their transaction-specific assets on the firm for a costs, loyal customer discounts, customer habits, the
transaction to change an existing service firm, this will emotional cost, and the cognitive effort. These are
result in losing transaction-specific assets. Thus, de- coupled with financial, social, and psychological risks
pendency on an existing service firm is related to ser- on the part of the buyer. Jones (1998) note that the
vice client firm's assets which are specialized to the switching cost has its sub-dimensions of continuality
transaction. If changing an existing transaction partner costs, contractual costs, learning costs, search costs,
increases switching cost, the service client firm's de- setup costs, and sunk costs. His further research with
pendency on the partner (or immersion of relation- his colleagues (2002), also propose the following six
ships) will be heightened. dimensions of switching costs: lost performance costs,
Transaction-specific assets, mainly, are determined by uncertainty costs, pre-switching search and evaluation
education for salespersons or know-how which is spe- costs, post-switching behavioral and cognitive costs,
cialized to sale. Also, if the service usage period is setup costs, and sunk costs.
long, the knowledge and experience of the firm will be
H-4: The service client firm's switching cost has an
accumulated. Thus, the service usage period in the
effect on service client firm's continuous usage
Web Analytics Services will increase transaction-
intention.
specific assets.
3
Authorized licensed use limited to: K J Somaiya College of Engineering. Downloaded on July 29,2010 at 07:16:36 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2009
Swit- Jones(1998)
Switching cost which occurs by changing of an service provider
ching cost Jones et al(2002)
Satisfaction Degree of sufficiency for using service compared to expectation Oliver (1997)
Oliver (1997)
Continuous service usage
Intention through the service satisfaction McDougall & Levesque
intention
(2000)
4
Authorized licensed use limited to: K J Somaiya College of Engineering. Downloaded on July 29,2010 at 07:16:36 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2009
5
Authorized licensed use limited to: K J Somaiya College of Engineering. Downloaded on July 29,2010 at 07:16:36 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2009
6
Authorized licensed use limited to: K J Somaiya College of Engineering. Downloaded on July 29,2010 at 07:16:36 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2009
7
Authorized licensed use limited to: K J Somaiya College of Engineering. Downloaded on July 29,2010 at 07:16:36 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.