You are on page 1of 5

Ø Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing

food-producing sectors.
Ø 10% annual growth between 1984 - 1995
Ø 3 % livestock meat
The Use of Probiotics in Ø 1.6% capture fisheries
Aquaculture Ø Disease outbreaks are a significant
constraint on aquaculture.
Ø The use of disinfectants and antimicrobials
have had limited success
Ø growing concern about the use of antibiotics
which encourage the emergence of bacterial
resistance.

Ø Need to reduce the use of antimicrobials.


Ø Emphasis needs to be on prevention.
Probiotics
Ø Probiotics are considered to be one of the
Ø Antibiotic use in Norway dropped from 50 most significant technologies to have
metric tons pa in 1987 to 746.5 kg in 1997.
evolved in response to disease control.
Ø Production of farmed fish in Norway increased
from 5 x 104 to 3.5 x 10 5 metric tons. Ø FAO defined the development of affordable,
Ø Vibrio alginolyticus has been used as a efficient vaccines, the use of
probiotic in Ecuadoran shrimp hatcheries immunostimulants and non-specific
since 1992. immune enhancers, and the use of
Ø Hatchery down time reduced from 7 days / probiotics and bioaugmentation for the
month to < 21 days / year. improvement of aquatic environmental
Ø Production ↑ by 35%, while antibiotic use ↓ by quality as major areas for further research
94% between 1991 and 1994. in disease control in aquaculture.

Definition of probiotics Definition of probiotics


Ø Fuller - a live microbial feed supplement
which beneficially affects the host animal A probiotic is a live microbial adjunct which
by improving its intestinal balance. has a beneficial effect on the host by
modifying the host-associated or ambient
Ø Not adequate for aquatic organisms. microbial community, by ensuring
Ø Terrestrial - gut represents a moist habitat in a improved use of feed or enhancing its
water-limiting environment. nutritional value, by enhancing the host
Ø Aquatic - hosts and microorganisms share the response towards disease, or by improving
ecosystem. Probiotic bacteria could also be the quality of its ambient environment.
active on the gills and skin of the host, as well
as in its ambient environment.
Verschuere et al. (2000) MMBR 64: 655-671

1
Can microbial communities be Ø Microbial communities influenced by
manipulated? deterministic and stochastic factors.
Ø Deterministic factors include:
Ø Aquaculture practices do not provide Ø salinity
appropriate environments for the Ø temperature
establishment of stable microbial Ø oxygen concentration
communities. Ø quantity and quality of feed
Ø Discontinuous culture cycles.
Ø Stochastic factors:
Ø Disinfection or cleaning of ponds or tanks
Ø chance favours organisms which happen to
prior to stocking.
be in the right place at the right time to enter
Ø sudden increases in nutrients due to the habitat and to proliferate if the conditions
exogenous feeding. are suitable.

Ø Instead of allowing spontaneous primary


colonisation of the rearing water by bacteria Ø Lactic acid bacteria
accidentally present, the water could be pre- Ø Not dominant in the normal intestinal
emptively colonised by the addition of microbiota of fish.
probiotic bacteria.
- recognised that pre-emptive colonisation Ø Addition of high doses in juvenile fish resulted
extends the reign of pioneer organisms. in a temporary change of the intestinal
microbial community.
Ø A single addition would suffice if the probiotic
bacteria are well adapted to the prevailing Ø Lost within a few days after inoculations
environmental conditions. halted.

Ø If the host / environment already carries a


stable microbial community, repeated
inoculations will be necessary.

Ø Accepted that fish contain a specific Application


intestinal microbiota that is established at
the juvenile stage or after metamorphosis.
Ø Probiotics are applied in the feed or added
Ø Unlikely that a single inoculum of a probiotic to the culture tank / pond as preventative
bacteria will result in long term dominant agents against infection by pathogenic
colonisation. bacteria.
Ø It will be necessary to supply the probiotic on
a regular basis if a continuous colonisation at Ø Nutritional effects are also often attributed
high densities is required. to probiotics (especially for filter feeders).
- especially if the bacterial species used do
not belong to the normal dominant intestinal
microbiota of the cultured species or its
particular development stage.

2
Application Fish eggs and larvae

Ø Most probiotics used in aquaculture are: Ø It is assumed that uncontrolled microbial


Ø Lactobacillus; Carnobacterium (lactic acid development in hatcheries is one of the
bacteria). main reasons for the unpredictable results.
Ø Vibrio s p. (V. alginolyticus) Ø Probiotics may be beneficial as control.
Ø Bacillus Ø 2 week old halibut larvae is affected by
incubation with indigenous fish bacteria
Ø Pseudomonas
Ø survival in presence of V. salmonicida-like
strains and Lactobacillus plantarum = 95%.

Fish eggs and larvae Fish juveniles and adults


Ø Several strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens
Ø Improved the survival rate of larval turbot were able to exclude a pathogenic A.
(Scophthalmus maximus) by daily addition salmonicida strain from Atlantic salmon
presmolts with stress-inducible furunculosis
of lactic acid bacteria to the enrichment
infection and to limit the mortality of rainbow
medium of the rotifers used as live food for trout (40 g) infected with V. anguillarum.
the turbot larvae (Gatesoupe, 1994).
Ø Short-term bathing of the fishes in a bacterial
Ø The added lactic acid bacteria could be suspension of the probiotic, long-term
retrieved in large amounts from the turbot exposure in the rearing water, or a
larvae, and a significant reduction of larval combination of the two treatments led to a
mortality was observed when the larvae were significant decrease in mortality after the
challenged with a pathogenic Vibrio on day 9. challenge trial.

Fish juveniles and adults Fish juveniles and adults


Ø A V. alginolyticus strain was applied in a bath
Ø A good correlation was found between the treatment to Atlantic salmon (21 g) maintained
production of siderophores and the protective in freshwater.
action of P. fluorescens, suggesting that
competition for free iron is involved in the Ø V. alginoiyticus was found in the intestine up
mode of action. to 21 days after the initial probiotic
application.
Ø P. fluorescens exerted its effect from the
host’s exterior, since the strain did not Ø Challenge experiments revealed that the
significantly invade the fish following bath probiont led to a reduction in mortality after
treatment. exposure to A. salmonicida and to a lesser
extent after exposure to V. anguillarum and V.
ordalii.

3
Penaeid shrimps Penaeid shrimps
Ø A non-pathogenic V. alginolyticus strain was Ø The use of several Bacillus cultures in
inoculated daily into 25-and 60-ton larval penaeid culture ponds in Indonesia allowed
rearing tanks containing Litopenaeus culture of the shrimps for over 160 days
vannamei postlarvae. without problems.
Ø Survival and wet wt. were higher in the Ø Farms that did not use the Bacillus cultures
probiotic-treated shrimps compared to experienced almost complete failure in all
shrimps receiving prophylactic doses of ponds, with luminescent Vibrio disease killing
oxytetracycline and the control group. the shrimps before 80 days of culture was
reached.
Ø V. parahaemolyticus was not detected in any
of the probiotic treated shrimps, while control Ø A cost-benefit analysis of the use of Bacillus
tanks and those containing shrimps receiving cultures on a particular farm in Thailand
antibiotics had V. parahaemolyticus in showed a clear benefit to the producer.
approximately 10% of the samples.

Penaeid shrimps Crabs


Ø After an inoculation of diatoms and rotifers,
Ø Strain BY-9 was produced on large scale and the bacterial strain PM-4 was introduced daily
inoculated at 10‘ CFU/ml into an 18-ton larval for 7 days in 200-m3 tanks containing crab
rearing tank for mass production of P. (Portunus trituberculatus) larvae and was also
monodon larvae. inoculated with diatoms and rotifers.

Ø The strain is known to inhibit the in vitro Ø There was a negative correlation between the
growth of V. harveyi. presence of PM-4 and the densities of Vibrio
spp.
Ø BY-9 inoculation gave a lower Vibrio density
Ø In 7 trials, the ave. survival of crab larvae +
(46.1%) and a higher survival rate (10.6%) than
strain PM-4 was 27.2%. In 6/9 trials without
control larvae cultured up to the tenth
PM-4, no larvae grew into adults, resulting in
postlarval stage.
an ave. survival of only 6.8%.

Bivalve molluscs Bivalve molluscs


Ø Alteromonas holoplanktis was isolated
from the gonads of Chilean scallop Ø Aeromonas media A199 inhibited 89 strains of
aeromonads and Vibrio in vitro.
(Argopecten purpuratus) broodstock.
Ø Prevented mortality in oyster (Crassostrea
Ø Displayed in vitro inhibitory activity against gigas) larvae challenged with Vibrio tubiashii.
the known pathogens V. ordalii, V.
parahaemolyticus, V. anguillarum V. Ø Since A. media A199 could no longer be
detected on the host only 4 days after the
alginolyticus, and Aeromanas hydrophila. probiotic treatment, it would be necessary to
introduce the probiotic at regular intervals if a
Ø Protected the scallop larvae against V.
prolonged protective effect is required.
anguillarum in an experimental infection.

4
Live food Unicellular algae
Ø Strain SK-05 was selected for its active growth
in organic-poor substrates and inoculated it
Ø Unicellular algae are often given as a first into a Skeletonema costatum culture.
food or are included in the culture system
as a food for rotifers and Artemia. Bacteria Ø V. alginolyticus was inoculated as a typical
contaminant.
increase the growth rate and yield of algae.
Ø Strain SK-05 prevented V. alginolyticus
Ø Since bacteria may also inhibit algal growth.
growth, careful screening is necessary Ø Since it exerted no in vitro inhibitory action
when bacteria are to be used as probiotics against V. alginolyticus, it seems that the
in larval rearing or in the green-water protection was due to competitive exclusion
technique. as only strain SK-05 was able to utilise S.
costatum exudates.

Artemia Nutritional effects


Ø Verschuere et al. selected 9 bacterial strains
that positively influenced the growth and/or
survival of juveniles of the brine shrimp Ø Addition of bacteria to the rearing water of
Artemia cultured as a live food for other filter feeders such as rotifers, bivalve larvae
species. or adults, and crustacean larvae may result
in massive uptake of these bacteria
Ø All 9 strains delayed the death of the Artemia
when experimentally infected with pathogenic Ø Bacteria may act as a (complementary)
V. proteolyticus CWST2.
food source or contribute to the digestion
Ø While all Artemia in the axenic control died within 2 of the food.
days after infection, the survival rates of the
Artemia cultures inoculated with strain LVSS or a
mixture of the 9 strains showed > 80% survival
after 4 days.

You might also like