Viraj Profiles Limited

Performance Appraisal System

Year : 2010 - 11
1 Employee Name Employee Code
Designation Head, IT Role Title
Department IT D.O.J
Direct Reporting to Unit / Plant
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)
2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl. Weightage %
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria Achievement % Supporting Instances
No. (Out of 100%)

1 Timely Implementation of applications/ softwares/ programs/

procedures/ developed within the year.

2 Improvement in internal customer satisfaction score

3 Costs saved through introduction of new applications / technology

4 Web based applications developed within the year

5 Certification of IT systems as per ISO 9001-2000 within specified

time
6

TOTAL 100%
Employee's signature Immediate Superior's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior 2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee

5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS) Rating by IS

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any) ___________________________________________________________________________

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH) Rating by HOD / FH

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O) Needs Improvement ( C )

Above Expectations (A) Poor (P)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH) Signature

9. Identified Training Needs

Program Description
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training) Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training Medium IT Department 2 Months

Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance criteria/ expectations

Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expectations
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the performance criteria
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performance
minimum performance criteria criteria
Poor (P)
 Head Office

Rating by
immediate
Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

Date
____________
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name
Designation IT Engineer,
Department I
Direct Reporting to

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 Increase IT literacy

2 Complaints resolved within specified time

3 Effective implementation of IT Initiatives

4 Timely completion of assigned duties

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11

IT Engineer, Networking
IT

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code
Role Title
D.O.J
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name
Designation IT Assistant,
Department I
Direct Reporting to

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 Ensure good maintenance of the IT infrastructure

2 Effective implementation of IT Initiatives

3 Complaints resolved within specified time

4 Timely completion of assigned duties

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11

IT Assistant, Infrastructure
IT

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code
Role Title
D.O.J
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name
Designation Manag
Department I
Direct Reporting to

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 New techniques introduced to enhance Productivity

2 Development of assigned programs for SAP module within

specified time
3 New Initiatives in regards to network facilities ( phones, email,
internet & nodes)
4 Improvement in email & internet connectivity

5 Introduction of firewall & data security measures within specified

targeted time
6

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11

Manager, IT
IT

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code
Role Title
D.O.J
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name
Designation Trai
Department I
Direct Reporting to

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 Complaints resolved within specified time

2 Timely completion of duties

3 Upgrading IT facilities as per plan

4 Ensure good co-ordination to have speedy functioning

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11

Trainee
IT

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code
Role Title
D.O.J
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name
Designation Sr. O
Department I
Direct Reporting to

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 Development and implementation of appropriate IT systems as per

plan

2 Complaints resolved within specified time

3 Optimization of resources to reduce cost

4 New techniques introduced to enhance IT personnel's productivity

5 Development of IT infrastructure (LAN/ WAN) as per plan

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11

Sr. Officer
IT

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code
Role Title
D.O.J
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name
Designation Basis Adm
Department I
Direct Reporting to

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 Efficiently handle the entire processes and systems related to SAP

2 Complaints resolved within specified time

3 Develop and implement new initiatives in SAP

4 Optimization of resources to reduce cost

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11

Basis Administrator
IT

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code
Role Title
D.O.J
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name
Designation In Cha
Department I
Direct Reporting to

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 Ensure effective implementation of IT initiatives

2 Inventory management

3 Ensure good maintenance of IT infrastructure

4 Optimization of resources to reduce cost

5 Maintenance and development of IT softwares

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11

In Charge, IT
IT

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code
Role Title
D.O.J
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name
Designation Server & Netwo
Department I
Direct Reporting to

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 Ensure effective security system

2 Complaints resolved within defined timeframe

3 Ensure implementation of best networking system

4 Ensure minimum downtime of the systems or network

5 Optimization of resources to reduce cost

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11

Server & Network Administrator

IT

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code
Role Title
D.O.J
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11
1 Employee Name G.GOVIND RAJU
Designation GET/PO
Department IT/EDP
Direct Reporting to MR. ZAMEER SHAIKH

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

Helpdesk coordination. Daily call loging. Trub

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

1 Increase IT literacy

2 Complaints resolved within specified time

3 Effective implementation of IT Initiatives

4 Timely completion of assigned duties

Ensure good maintenance of the IT infrastructure

5

A) SAP/ABAP under Mr. Gourav Kuchhal & Mr. Satis

6 Maika. B)PPS Project
under Mr. Satis Maika.

TOTAL
Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
 1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee Thanque to Viraj group which has given me a plateform to start my
Also thanque to my IT Department which provide us to learn basic about technology running into industry and
I have given my best in all areas of my performances/assignments. I know about programing and I feel
I have worked a bit in ABAP, So I request you all to give me chance to utilize my programing/logical

5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any) ___________________________________

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)
 Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions
(Assigning Mentor /
Area for Development OJT / Ext. Training) Criticality (High / Medium / Low)
SAP Development ABAP Training Medium
Administration Server Medium
Administration Network Medium

Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance criteria/ expectations

Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expectations
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the performance criteria
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meetstoameet
Fails few key
theexpectations of the performance
minimum performance criteria criteria
Poor (P)
es Limited
ppraisal System
010 - 11
D RAJU Employee Code 906314
PO Role Title
DP D.O.J 21-Jun-10
R SHAIKH Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

coordination. Daily call loging. Trubleshooting. Domain management. IT infrastructure.

Rating by
Weightage % immediate
Achievement % Supporting Instances Self Rating
(Out of 100%) Supervisor/
Manager

A)Truble shooting : As per company/users

requirement installation of various software.
B)Hardware support for the laptops,
desktops, printers, scanners in the company.
 A) Windows Server 2008 training by Mr.
Benkat from HCL.
B) Video conferrencing by Mr.
Mitas from Syndrome.
C) PPS implementation study
by Algorythem.

A) Domain management project under Mr.

Prakshit Panchal.
B) Inventory Management
(SMS1,VPL,VFL) under Mr. Indresh Chandra.
C)
Biometric verification on all punching
terminals under Mr. Mritunjay Kumar.

A) Proper updation of Antivirous. B)

Periodical scanning of system.

100%
Immediate Superior's signature Date
 2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

as given me a plateform to start my bright career and providing a wonderfool environment.

echnology running into industry and guide us to make easier to understand.
know about programing and I feel I can do better in development area.
e to utilize my programing/logical skills into SAP development area.

Rating by IS

_____________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)
 Signature

Description

Responsibility Time Frame

IT Department 2 Months
IT Department 1 Months
IT Department 1 Months

e criteria/ expectations
pectations
rformance criteria
ance
ria criteria
 Viraj Profi
Performance A
Year : 2
1 Employee Name BIRENDRA K
Designation GET
Department I
Direct Reporting to MR. INDRES

2. Nature and scope of responsibilities

3. Performance Objectives

Sl.
Objectives / Key Result Area Measurement Criteria
No.

Efficiently handle the helpdesk and reduced the response time.

A) Was assigning calls to Engineers
& Managing them.
1 B) Was submitting daily calls report to HOD & concern people.

2 Daily complaints log resolved within specified time

3 Develop and implement new initiatives in SAP

4 Optimization of resources to reduce cost

Employee's signature
At the time of setting of KRA
At the time of review

Note :
1. Objectives, Key Result Areas and Targets should be jointly set with Superior
3. Number of objectives set should be around five

4. Comments by Employee
5. Comments by Immediate Superior (IS)

Name of Immediate Superior (IS)

6 Comments by HR (Disciplinary Action Taken (if any)

7. Comments by Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

8. Final rating (Normalization committee will decide the final rating)

Outstanding (O)
Above Expectations (A)
Meets Expectations (M)

Name of Department Head (HOD) / Functional Head (FH)

9. Identified Training Needs

Program
Functional
Technical
Managerial/ Behavioral

10. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Agreed Actions (Assigning Mentor / OJT /
Area for Development Ext. Training)
e.g : Functional Training SAP Training
Outstanding (O) Consistently exceeds most of the performance c
Above Expectations (A) Exceeds many of the performance criteria/ expe
Meets Expectations (M) Meets all expectations exceeds few of the perfo
Needs Improvement ( C ) Meets
Fails toameet
few key
theexpectations of the performanc
minimum performance criteria
Poor (P)
 Viraj Profiles Limited
Performance Appraisal System
Year : 2010 - 11
BIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH
GET/PO
IT
MR. INDRESH CHANDRA

Weightage %
Measurement Criteria Achievement %
(Out of 100%)

TOTAL 100%
ignature Immediate Superior's signature

2. All objectives and achievements should be measurable

 Rating by IS

___________________________________________________________________________

Rating by HOD / FH

Needs Improvement ( C )
Poor (P)

Signature

Description

Criticality (High / Medium / Low) Responsibility Time Frame

Medium IT Department 2 Months
ost of the performance criteria/ expectations
rformance criteria/ expectations
xceeds few of the performance criteria
ations of the performance
um performance criteria criteria
 Employee Code 906316
Role Title
D.O.J 21-Jun-10
Unit / Plant Head Office
Unauthorized Leave (IF Any)

Rating by
immediate
Supporting Instances Self Rating
Supervisor/
Manager

e Date

nts should be measurable

________________________________________

Description