Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

For the Rating Period : November 2010-March 2011

Employee's Name: School:

Position: SST - 1
PART I
TARGET AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS
PERFORMANCE
Weight Work/ Unit of Measure Quantity Quality Time Supervisor
Activity Indicator TARGET Accomplishment TARGET Accomplishment TARGET Accomp. QN QL T
20% A. Improve- Improve A.1 75% of the 88% of the students No student No student First
ment of of School students shall have have achieved 75% shall obtain obtain a score End of week
school Performance achieved 75% level level of proficiency a score lower than 5o% March of
Performance of proficiency in in all subject areas lower than 50% 2011 March
all subject areas
A.2 40-55% MPS 52% MPS have been Increase MPS 2% increase of Third Third
shall have been obtained of the class by 2-3% in MPS in all subject week week
obtained by the in RAT all subject areas of of
class in DAT/ areas March March
RAT/NAT
A.3 90% readers 95% readers have All students are All students are End of
shall have been been achieved by at least in the in the instructional March March
achieved by the the class instructional level 2011 2011
class. level
A.4. 88% nume- 95% numerates have 60% of the stu- 89% of the students
rates shall have been achieved by dents shall have have gained the End of Nov.
been achieved the class gained mastery mastery of fundamental March 2011
by the class of fundamental operations 2011
operations
A.5 80% of the 89% of the school's At least
school's academic/ academic/non- 3rd placer 3rd placer End of First
non-academic academic competitions Feb. week
competitions have been participated 2011 of
shall have been by the students Feb.
participated by
the students
c of the Philippines
ment of Education
VII, Central Visayas

CE EVALUATION SYSTEM
d : November 2010-March 2011

RATINGS

Supervisor Employee
APS EPS QN QL T APS EPS

10 8 8 8.67 1.73

8 6 6 6.67 1.33

10 8 10 9.33 1.87

10 8 10 9.33 1.87

8 10 10 9.33 1.87
 SUMMARY OF RATINGS
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SCORES
RATER
PART I PART II
Supervisor
Self 5.62 2.7
Total Overall Score
Add rating on intervening tast if ( any )

FINAL NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING

EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL RATING

CLAUDIO F. MACAHILOS
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON
THE ABOVE RATINGS:
Rater

CLAUDIO F. MACAHILOS
PERC Action:
School Head

RECOMMENDATION:
RY OF RATINGS
OVERALL POINT OVERALL
RAGE SCORES
SCORE WEIGHT % WEIGHTED
PART II SCORE
50%
2.7 8.3 50% 4.2

LIZA V. NAVALES
Confirmed by the Next Higher
Ratee
Supervisor

MERLYN J. SOLUTAN MA. MILAGROS C. VELEZ

President, Teachers' Organization Schools Division Superintendent

.
PART II. CRITICAL FACTORS

1. COURTESY

2. HUMAN RELATIONS

3. PUNCTUALITY AND
ATTENDANCE

4. INITIATIVE

5. LEADERSHIP
(For supervisory only)
6. JUDGEMENT/DECISION
MAKING
7. STRESS TOLERANCE
8. OTHERS ( specify )
 CRITICAL FACTORS

Polite, kind and thoughtful towards the public/clientele in manner of speech

and action.
Integrate concerns for people at work, office clientele and supervisor subordinate
relationship into work situation.
Observed behavior of coming to the office on time or to be present at work to
complete assigned responsibilities.
Starts action, projects and performs assigned task without being told under minimal
supervision.
The manner of guiding, influencing, motivating and developing confidence of
subordinates to work as a team and accomplish tasks, leading the organizational unit
Ability to develop alternative solutions to problems, to evaluate facts or cources of
action, and to reach sound decision and readiness to take action or commit oneself.
Stability of performance under pressure or opposition

Total Point Score

Divide by # Entries
Average Point Score
Multiply by Part II Weight (30%)
Weighted Average Score
 RATINGS
SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE

10

10

N/A

52
6
8.67
0.3
2.6