Professional Documents
Culture Documents
their keen interest, constant encouragement and invaluable guidance during the
Srinivasu, for a kind patronage. We express our sincere thanks to Dr. K Sivaji Babu,
Department of mechanical Engineering for providing the lab during the entire
Project Associates,
Prathyusha Achanta,
Pranoy Yerraguntla,
Ashish Kalipatnapu.
Abstract
One of the most important damage mechanisms in composite
structures.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2. FIBER REINFORCED POLYMERS
1.3. INTRODUCTION TO FRACTURE
1.3.1 MODES OF FAILURES
1.3.2EXAMPLES OF STRUCTURAL FAILURES CAUSED BY
FRACTURE• MECHANICAL, AERONAUTICAL, OR marine•
CIVIL ENGINEERING
1.4. FRACTURE MECHANICS VS. STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
2. LITERATURE SURVEY
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 TYPOLOGY OF FRP DELAMINATION
2.2.1 INTERLAMINAR CRACKS AND LINEAR ELASTIC
FRACTURE MECHANICS
2.2.2 BASIC ANALYSIS OF INTERLAMINAR FRACTURE
TOUGHNESS
2.3. FRACTURE MODES
2.3.1. MICROSCOPIC ASPECTS
2.4. MAJOR HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN FRACTURE
MECHANICS
2.5. THE STUDY OF DELAMINATION USING NUMERICAL
METHODS
7 REFERENCES
List of Figures
Fig.2.2 Internal delamination: (a) disposition across the laminate and (b)
(c) open buckled; (d) closed buckled; (e) edge buckled and (f) edge buckled
Fig.2.7.Crack propagation modes: (a) mode I; (b) mode II and (c) mode III
Fig.2.8.Stress field of a resin rich area point and matrix micro crack
Fig.2.9 Crack growth at (a) θ/0 and (b) 0/0 ply interfaces illustrating the
interface: (a)micro crack formation ahead of the crack tip; (b) micro crack
growth and opening and (c) micro crack coalescence accompanied by shear
cusps
reversed Delamination
Fig. 4.1 Geometry and Loaded model for edge crack at centre interface.
Fig 4.3 Deformed model after cylindrical bending due to uniform pressure
Fig 4.4: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-0-0-0
laminate.
Fig 4.5: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-90-90-
90 laminate.
Fig 4.6: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-90-90-0
laminate.
Fig 4.7: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-0-0-90
laminate.
Fig 4.8: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-90-0-90
laminate.
Fig 4.9: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-0-90-0
laminate.
Fig: 4.10 Loaded model for edge crack opening at centre interface
Fig. 4.11 Deformed model for edge crack opening at centre interface
Fig 4.12 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-
0-0-0 laminate
Fig 4.13 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with
90-90-90-90 laminate
Fig 4.14 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-
90-90-0 laminate.
Fig 4.15 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with
90-0-0-90 laminate.
Fig 4.16 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-
90-0-90 laminate
Fig 4.17 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with
90-0-0-90 laminate.
load
Fig 5.5: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-0-0-0
laminate.
Fig 5.6: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-90-90-
90 laminate.
Fig 5.7: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-90-90-0
laminate.
Fig 5.8: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-0-0-90
laminate.
Fig 5.9: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-90-0-90
laminate
Fig 5.10: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-0-90-
0 laminate.
Fig. 5.12 Deformed model for centre crack opening at centre interface
Fig 5.13 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-
0-0-0 laminate.
Fig 5.14 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with
90-90-90-90 laminate.
Fig 5.15 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-
90-90-0 laminate.
Fig 5.16 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with
90-0-0-90 laminate.
Fig 5.17 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-
90-0-90 laminate.
Fig 5.18 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with90-
0-90-0 laminate
NOMENCLATURE
1.1 INTRODUCTION
wood, due to their better specific properties. The excellent stiffness to weight
those reinforced with glass or carbon fibres make them very attractive for certain
manufacturing costs, these materials are being used more and more in different
implants, car parts, fluid containers and pipes, small boats and road bridges
increment in the use of this type of material by the general industrial sector.
composite element not only requires the design of the element geometry, but the
design of the material itself. Traditionally, due to the reduced knowledge of the
The oldest composite materials appeared long time ago in the nature.
Wood can be seen as a lignin matrix reinforced by cellulose fibres. Human and
bone matrix. The first man made composite was straw-reinforced clay for bricks
and pottery. Present composite materials use metal, ceramic or polymer binders
possible to identify the interface between components. Taking into account their
or light metals) with different fibres (glass, carbon, organic and polymeric
They can be distinguished in function of their typology (long o short fibres, random
properties of the resulting composite, which is then known as hybrid. This is the
reinforced with steel rods. When a light core material is sandwiched between two
faces of stiff and strong materials, the result is an improved material called
sandwich.
1.3. INTRODUCTION TO FRACTURE
various modes of structural failure and highlight the importance of fracture induced
failure and contrast it with the limited coverage given to fracture mechanics in
Engineering Education. In the next section we will discuss some examples of well
shall compare the failure load predicted from linear elastic fracture mechanics with
to resist mechanical failure through any (or a combination of) the following modes:
5. Fracture
Most of these failure modes are relatively well understood, and proper
occurring after earthquakes constitute the major source of structural damage, and
are the least well understood. In fact, fracture often has been overlooked as a
simplification is not new, and finds a very similar analogy in the critical load of a
design may result as instability (or buckling) is overlooked for slender members.
Thus failure curves for columns show a smooth transition in the failure mode from
analogy, a cracked structure can be designed on the sole basis of strength as long as
the crack size does not exceed a critical value. Should the crack size exceed this
critical value, then a fracture-based failure results. Again, on the basis of those two
theories (strength of materials and fracture mechanics), one could draw a failure
air during the fifties, or more recently fatigue fracture of bulkhead in a Japan
4. Fatigue fractures found in the Grumman buses in New York City, which
6. Fatigue crack that triggered the sudden loss of the upper cockpit in the Air
• Civil engineering
cases fractures are man-made and induced for beneficial purposes examples
include:
3. “Biting” of candies.
1.4. FRACTURE MECHANICS VS. STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
We will seek to determine its safe load-carrying capacity using the two
approaches.
KI≤ KIc
Where K Iis a measure of the stress singularity at the tip of the crack and KIc is the
The two equations governing the load capacity of the beam according to
On the basis of the above, we can schematically represent the failure envelope of
this beam in fig.where failure stress is clearly a function of the crack length.
the curve shown in Fig. We thus identify four corners: on the lower left we have our
usual engineering design zone, where factors of safety are relatively high; on the
bottom right we have failure governed by yielding, or plasticity; on the upper left
failure is governed by linear elastic fracture mechanics; and on the upper right
zone has been called elasto-plastic in metals, and nonlinear fracture in concrete.
2
LITERATURE SURVEY
2.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter, it has been stated that the main objective of the
present work is the study of inter-laminar fracture behaviour of four layered cross-
inter-laminar cracks and continues with the application of fracture mechanics basic
mechanism of composite laminates that can form during any moment of the life of
and [2] the technological causes of the delamination can be grouped in two
pressurised containers. In all these cases, the normal stresses in the interface of
two adjacent plies can originate the loss of adhesion and the initiation of the inter-
laminar crack. The second category includes abrupt changes of section, such as ply
drop-offs, unions between stiffeners and thin plates, free edges, and other
bonded and bolted joints. A third category related to temperature and moisture
effects can be added. The difference between the thermal coefficients of matrix
may originate delamination [3]. Similarly, the differential inflation of the plies
due to the shrinkage of the matrix, formation of resin-rich areas due to poor
quality in lying the plies, etc. [5-6]. Impact is an important source of delamination
laminate and can be due to the interaction of matrix cracks and ply interfaces.
the 90º plies of cross-ply laminates are common examples of this type of
delamination. Figure 2.1 shows a replica with an inner delamination growing from a
laminate subjected to axial load [8]. In the replica, some fibre breaks in the 0º ply
can be seen due to the stress concentration near the transverse crack.
elements. In particular, when compression loads are applied, the overall flexural
2.2). Although the delamination separates the laminate in two parts, there is an
interaction between the deformation of the one part of the laminate and the
other. Due to this interaction, both parts of the laminate deflect in a similar way.
Fig.2.2 Internal delamination: (a) disposition across the laminate and (b)
deformation of the rest of the laminate. Therefore, the deformation of the near-
surface delaminated part does not necessary follow the deformation of the rest
of the laminate. Consequently, not only the growth of the near-surface
delamination has to be taken into account but also its local stability. [5-6] classified
static loads either under fatigue conditions. In both cases, the reduction in strength
are very stiff in the laminate plane and behave as linear elastic materials in
materials are in most cases very low compared to the in-plane tensile strength.
of impacts, fabrication problems, etc.) are present in the material [9]. After
release rate, the delamination will propagate when the energy release rate
achieves a critical value, Gc. According to [10], for any form of elastic behaviour,
the energy release rate can be expressed as a function of the increment of
external work Ue, strain energy Us (kinetic energy is ignored in this case) and
crack increment ∆a. Therefore, for a crack of width b and length a, the
length a+∆a. In point A1 the applied load is P1, the displacement is 1 and
delamination length a. In point A2 the applied load and displacement are P2 and 2,
Therefore, the external work and strain energy of the linear variation
figure). If linear deformation behaviour is assumed, the straight lines showed in the
For the considered crack increment and width, the increment in crack area
would be b∆a. Thus, as the critical energy release rate can be defined as the change
The compliance of the system depends on the crack length and is defined
as
Taking into account the increments of load and displacement and equation,
materials, the variation of the applied load with respect the obtained displacement,
as shown in Figure 2.4, is basic. This experimental data, together with the crack
length, is the basis for the calculation of G and the generation of the R-
matrix composites the non-linearity point coincides with the point at which
the initiation of the crack can be observed (see Figure 2.5(a)). However, for tough
matrices a region of non-linear behaviour may precede the observation of the crack
intersection between the load-displacement curve and the line that corresponds to
load occurs before intersection, then the maximum load and corresponding
crack growth cases. Unstable crack growth is characterised by one or more periods
a local peak load when delamination growth restarts. This behaviour is usually
curves [11]. Figure 2.6 shows a typical load-displacement curve for the case of
(shearing), mode III (tearing) and in any combination of these (see Figure 2.7). Every
mode has a fracture toughness value and an R-curve associated which are intrinsic
considered. For these materials, the fracture toughness is lowest in this mode
and even if the crack starts to grow under a different mode, the crack will
Fig.2.7.Crack propagation modes: (a) mode I; (b) mode II and (c) mode III
The propagation of delaminations in laminated composite materials is
mainly limited to lie between the strong fibre reinforced layers. In this way, it is
propagation modes. A clear example is the case of transverse matrix cracks growing
in the 90º plies of cross-ply laminates loaded in tension (see Figure 2.1). Once the
crack reaches the strong fibres at the (0/90) interface, the crack is forced to deviate
and change direction in order to remain in the interface. Then, the propagation
mode is changed. In fact, composite delaminations are mostly studied under pure
mode I, pure mode II and mixed-mode I/II. It is generally accepted that the mode III
of the constraints of adjacent plies, as shown by [12] for a layered structure and
delamination in composite laminates are higher in mode III than in the other
modes [9]. In the foregoing the term mixed-mode will stand for the mixed-
critical energy release rate. The stress intensity factor is governed by the local
laminates complicates. [2] state that the use of G for composite materials is
certainly more consistent with the analytical models in use than K, even
energy release rate, Gc, instead of the critical stress intensity factor, Kc, to
preceded by the formation of a damage zone ahead of the crack tip. This damage
zone is characterised by the formation of microcracks in the resin rich areas that
exist between the plies. According to [14], at this microscopic level, the matrix can
will only crack under tensile load conditions (local mode I). Therefore, matrix
microcracks will form and grow in the plane subjected to maximum tensile
stress. Figure 2.8 shows schematically a point of a resin rich area in the ply
interface subjected to mode I (opening) and mode II (shearing) loading and the
Under mixed-mode load condition, microcracks ahead of the crack tip form
at an angle from the plane of the plies and grow in this direction. According to [15],
when such a microcrack is located at 0/0 ply interface, where 0 stands for an off-
axis ply, fibres on the off-axis ply allow the propagation of the microcrack through
the ply. Consequently, the crack tip of the delamination migrates through the off-
axis ply. A change in the crack plane can be achieved if the crack tip
encounters the next ply interface. In this case, the study and characterisation
ply interface, the fibres at both 0º plies prevent the propagation of the crack
through the plies. The interlaminar crack is forced to remain adjacent to the fibres
of the ply. The mechanism is represented in Figure 2.9(b). In this case, no change in
the crack plane is present and the study and characterisation of the delamination
become easier. Actually, in order to avoid the crack plane migration, the study of
delaminations in composite laminates is usually carried out using unidirectional
Fig.2.9 Crack growth at (a) θ/0 and (b) 0/0 ply interfaces illustrating the
crack plane migration mechanism [15]
As mentioned, since further growing would require fibre fracture, at 0/0 ply
interfaces the growth of the microcracks is arrested when they reach the
fibres of one of the boundaries of the interlaminar zone. In the general case of
mode I, the matrix microcracks grow relatively parallel to the plane of the
interply boundaries, where the presence of the fibres modifies the damage zone
ahead of the crack tip and increases the stress concentration. This results in the
growth of the delamination by the peeling of the matrix from the fibres. According
to [14], this process justifies the presence of fibres in one of the fracture surfaces
The presence of fibres bridging both fracture surfaces near the crack tip is
arrest or reduce the propagation of the delamination. In fact, the growth of the
crack involves pulling these bridging fibres from the resin under a tensile stress
state until they finally break. Accordingly, an artificial increment of the material
fracture toughness that depends on the crack extension is observed. For longer
crack lengths, more fibres from both fracture surfaces are bridging the crack. It has
been experimentally found that this effect is more important for higher mode I
contributions and less important for higher mode II dominated fractures [15],[17].
In this case, fibre breakage, broken pullout fibres, behind the crack tip can
structures. Figure 2.10 shows an interlaminar crack with the presence of fibre
Fig.2.10. Fibre bridging in a mode I interlaminar crack. The vertical arrow indicates a
point 20 mm behind the crack tip [19]
For a greater contribution of mode II the size of the damage zone
distance ahead of the crack tip. In addition, the angle between the direction
of the microcracks and the plane of the plies increases up to 45º. The coalescence
of the microcracks results in the growth of the interlaminar crack but with uneven
surfaces. These uneven surfaces are due to the formation of shear cusps or hackles.
For a greater contribution of mode II, more shear cusps form and deeper they
are. In addition, less influence of fibre bridging is observed [20]. The increased
the increases of the measured fracture toughness for this mode, since more
atomic bonds have to be broken [14]. Figure 2.11 shows schematically the
formation and coalescence of mode II microcracks that result in the formation and
surfaces are subsequently subjected to a fatigue process in mode II, the shear
cusps will degrade into matrix rollers due to the effect of the friction between
The previous figure shows the formation of the damage zone ahead of
the crack tip for mode II delamination for a non-reversed loading condition. If a
the normal direction to the previous, this is at -45º. Therefore, two sets of
microcracks form at approximately 90º [21]. Figure 2.12 shows the schema of the
microcrack formation ahead of the crack tip for mode II reversed and non-
As with any engineering discipline approached for the first time, it is helpful
to put fracture mechanics into perspective by first listing its major developments:
2. While investigating the unexpected failure of naval ships in 1913, [23] extended
the solution for stresses around a circular hole in an infinite plate to the more
general case of an ellipse. It should be noted that this problem was solved 3 years
however history remembers only Inglis who showed that a stress concentration
factor of
Prevails around the ellipse (where a is the half length of the major axis, and ρ is the
radius of curvature) 5.
3. Inglis’s early work was followed by the classical studies of Griffith, who was not
not yet a discipline), but rather in the tensile strength of crystalline solids and its
equal to E/10 where E is the Young’s Modulus *24+. With his assistant Lockspeiser,
Griffith was then working at the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) at Farnborough,
England (which had a tradition of tolerance for original and eccentric young
researchers), and was testing the strength of glass rods of different diameters at
different temperatures [25]. They found that the strength increased rapidly as the
size decreased. Asymptotic values of 1,600 and 25 Ksi were found for infinitesimally
small and bulk size specimens, respectively. On the basis of those two observations,
Griffith’s first major contribution to fracture mechanics was to suggest that internal
minute flaws acted as stress raisers in solids, thus strongly affecting their tensile
strengths. Thus, in reviewing Inglis’s early work, Griffith determined that the
glass strength from the theoretical value to the actually measured value.
dynamical criterion
for fracture by considering the total change in energy taking place during cracking.
During crack extension, potential energy (both external work and internal strain
night Lockspeiser forgot to turn off the gas torch used for glass melting, resulting in
a fire. Following an investigation, (RAE) decided that Griffith should stop wasting his
about 20 years until 1939 when Westergaard [26] derived an expression for the
6. Up to this point, fracture mechanics was still a relatively obscure and esoteric
science. However, more than any other single factor, the large number of sudden
and catastrophic fractures that occurred in ships during and following World War II
5,000 welded ships constructed during the war, over 1,000 suffered structural
damage, with 150 of these being seriously damaged, and 10 fractured into two
parts. After the war, George Irwin, who was at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory,
made use of Griffith’s idea, and thus set the foundations of fracture mechanics. He
made three major contributions: (a) He (and independently Orowan) extended the
Griffith’s original theory to metals by accounting for yielding at the crack tip. This
resulted in what is sometimes called the modified Griffith’s theory. (b) He altered
surround it by a corrosive environment. In either case the original crack length, and
loading condition, taken separately, are below their critical value. Paris in 1961
proposed the first empirical equation relating the range of the stress intensity
utilized the crack opening displacement (COD) as the parameter to characterize the
strength of a crack in an elasto-plastic solid, and by Rice, who introduce his J
integral in 1968 in probably the second most referenced paper in the field (after
Griffith); it introduced a path independent contour line integral that is the rate of
change of the potential energy for an elastic non-linear solid during a unit crack
extension.
9. Another major contribution was made by Erdogan and Sih in the mid ’60s when
laminates and composites; (iii) numerical techniques; (iv) design philosophies; and
others.
11. In 1976, [27] introduced the fictitious crack model in which residual tensile
stresses can be transmitted across a portion of the crack. Thus a new meaning was
12. In 1979 [28] showed that for the objective analysis of cracked concrete
structure, fracture mechanics concepts must be used, and that classical strength of
materials are solved using finite element methods (FEM) and other numerical
shortly after the first studies about delamination in composites. [29] used a
numerical elasticity solution based on finite differences for the analysis of free
edge delaminations. [30] studied the same problem using a 3-D finite
the distribution of the axial displacements was taken into account. Until this work,
FEM solutions were only available under plane stress or strain conditions. [32]
were the first to obtain sufficiently accurate results of the free edge problem using
a 2-D finite element model. [33] were the first to report the calculation of the
stress singularities in the free edge of the laminate. This work, based on
Lekhnitskii’s stress potentials, was an important contribution and the basis for
other analytical models in the field of composite delaminations. This work was
followed by [34] with a solution to the free edge problem for a ±45 angle ply
laminate.
virtual crack closure technique (VCCT). This technique is based on Irwin’s crack
closure integral [35-37] and assumes that the energy ∆E released when the crack
methods, are based on finite element methods and solve a submodel for
every integration point of the model. It is in the submodel where the mechanical
3.1. INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter, the relevant literature available has been reviewed
and scope for the present work has been identified. In this chapter, statement of
the problem of present work and method used for solution of the problem has
been explained.
composite laminates with delamination at two different locations (edge crack and
centre crack) using virtual crack closure technique (VCCT) in combination with finite
element method.
3.3 METHODOLOGY
and bottom crack surfaces. The nodes at both discontinuity (crack) sides have the
same coordinates and are coupled through multi-point constraints. This multi-
point constraint type ties all the degrees of freedom at the tied node to the
coincides with the energy required to close the crack to its original condition, from
reaction forces developed due to the multi-point constraints at the crack tip per
unit area of virtual cracked surface for the considered loading condition.
material properties and crack length are explained in forth coming chapters.
3.4 ASSUMPTIONS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the analysis of edge crack laminates supported along two
opposite edges and subjected to two different load cases. In first case, a uniform pressure
is applied on the top surface of the laminate. And in second case, a uniform line load is
applied along the top edge of the laminate parallel to the supported end.
dimension of the plate taken as 100 mm span (L) with a span/depth ratio of 10. Four layers
of equal thickness (10/4=2.5mm) are considered. The width of the plate is considered to be
infinite. The crack location is at one end of the laminate. The length of the crack is varied
from 15mm to 85mm. By trial and error method, comparison of theoretical and analytical
Energy release rate for isotropic material, the crack extension is found to be 0.11mm. . The
Fig. 4.1 Geometry and Loaded model for edge crack at centre interface.
Finite element mesh is generated using 20 node quadratic solid element SOLID95 in
ANSYS software. This element is defined by 20 nodes having three degrees of freedom per
node: translations in the nodal x, y and z directions. The element may have any spatial
orientation. SOLID95 has plasticity, creep, stress stiffening, large deflection, and large strain
capabilities. It has the capability to inherit orthotropic material properties and hence, best
The surfaces between the laminates, apart from those at the crack, are bonded
together using a contact pair. The coincident nodes at the surface of the crack extension
length are coupled. Simply supported boundary condition is applied on the bottom edges
of the x-z plane, i.e.; degrees of freedom along the z-axis are constrained. The plate is also
constrained in the y-direction to imply infinite length, and plane strain condition.
E1=147GPa; E2=E3=10.3GPa
G12=G13=7GPa; G23=3.7GPa
4.3 CASE ONE: PRESSURE LOADING
The transverse uniform pressure of 1 MPa is applied on the surface along the top
Fig 4.3 Deformed model after cylindrical bending due to uniform pressure
The position of the crack is varied between different laminate interfaces, along
with the increase in the length of the crack. The nature of deflection in the Z-axis direction
is studied and the Strain Energy Release Rate in the plate is calculated from the element
tables.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS:
With respect to Fig 4.4 to 4-9, the total amount of Energy is first used to deform
the crack region transversely and then for the extension of the crack longitudinally. Initially,
the energy required to deform is less. But, as the crack length increases, the energy
required to deform the crack region increases. Hence, more amount of energy has to be
supplied to shear the crack. After a certain crack length, the material resistance of the
laminate decreases. As a result of this the amount energy required to shear the crack
decreases.
4.3.1 ALL LONGITUDINAL FIBRES
120
Edge Crack 0-0-0-0
Top Interface
100 Bottom Interface
Centre Interface
80
G (J/m2)
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
a (mm)
Fig 4.4: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-0-0-0 laminate.
1600
Edge Crack 90-90-90-90
1000
G (J/m2)
800
600
400
200
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
a (mm)
Fig 4.5: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-90-90-90 laminate.
The amount of energy required shear the crack is very much less when all the fibres are
oriented longitudinally than transversely, as the fibre and crack extension are in the same
direction.
4.3.3 SYMMETRIC FIBRE ORIENTATION
700
Edge Crack 0-90-90-0
Top Interface
600
Bottom Interface
Centre Interface
500
G (J/m2)
400
300
200
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
a (mm)
Fig 4.6: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-90-90-0 laminate.
450
Edge Crack 90-0-0-90
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
a (mm)
Fig 4.7: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-0-0-90 laminate.
In symmetric fibres there is a very slight difference in the Strain energy release rate at the
top and bottom interfaces. The symmetric nature of the Energy distribution is disrupted by
the proximity of the boundary conditions applied on the bottom layer of the laminate.
4.3.4 ANTISYMMETRIC FIBRE ORIENTATION
Top Interface
500 Bottom Interface
Centre Interface
400
G (J/m2)
300
200
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
a (mm)
Fig 4.8: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-90-0-90 laminate.
600
Edge Crack 90-0-90-0
Top Interface
500 Bottom Interface
Centre Interface
400
G (J/m2)
300
200
100
0
0 20 40
a (mm) 60 80 100
Fig 4.9: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-0-90-0 laminate.
The structural resistance when the top layer is oriented 00 is greater than fibres oriented
with 900 at the top layer.
4.4 CASE TWO: LINE LOADING
A line load of 10 N is applied on the line along the top edge of the laminate, parallel
to the supported end.
Fig: 4.10 Loaded model for edge crack opening at centre interface
Fig. 4.11 Deformed model for edge crack opening at centre interface
Analysis of Results:
Fig 4-12 to 4-17 show that the opening up of a crack requires more amount of energy, as
the energy required for deformation of the crack dominates more than the energy required
0.7
0.6
0.5
G (J/m2)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
a (mm)
Fig 4.12 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-0-0-0 laminate
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
a (mm)
Fig 4.13 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 90-90-90-90
laminate
5.4.3 SYMMETRIC FIBRE ORIENTATION
2.5
2
G (J/m2)
1.5
0.5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
a (mm)
Fig 4.14 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-90-90-0
laminate.
2.5
2
G (J/m2)
1.5
0.5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
a (mm)
Fig 4.15 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 90-0-0-90
laminate.
4.4.4 ANTISYMMETRIC FIBRE ORIENTATION
2.5
2
G (J/m2)
1.5
0.5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
a (mm)
Fig 4.16 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-90-0-90
laminate
2.5
2
G (J/m2)
1.5
0.5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
a (mm)
Fig 4.17 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 90-0-0-90
laminate.
5
5.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the analysis of centre crack laminates supported along two
opposite edges and subjected to two different load cases. In first case, a uniform pressure
is applied on the top surface of the laminate. And in second case, a uniform line load is
applied along the top edge of the laminate parallel to the supported end.
In this model the cross-section of the rectangular dimension plate are taken as 100
mm span (L) with a span/depth ratio of 10. Four layers of equal thickness (10/4=2.5mm)
are considered. The width of the plate is considered to be infinite. The crack location is at
centre of the laminate. The length of the crack is varied from 15mm to 75mm. The crack
ANSYS software. This element is defined by 20 nodes having three degrees of freedom per
node; translations in the nodal x, y and z directions. The element may have any spatial
orientation. SOLID95 has plasticity, creep, stress stiffening, large deflection, and large strain
capabilities. It has the capability to inherit orthotropic material properties and hence, best
The surfaces between the laminates, apart from those at the crack, are bonded
together using a contact pair. The coincident nodes at the surface of the crack extension
length are coupled. Simply supported boundary condition is applied on the bottom edges
of the x-z plane, i.e.; degrees of freedom along the z-axis are constrained. The plate is also
constrained in the y-direction to imply infinite length, and plane strain condition.
E1=147GPa; E2=E3=10.3GPa
G12=G13=7GPa; G23=3.7GPa
5.3 CASE ONE: UNIFORM PRESSURE
The transverse uniform pressure of 1 MPa is applied on the surface along the top
The position of the crack is varied between different laminate interfaces, along
with the increase in the length of the crack. The nature of deflection is studied and the
Strain Energy Release Rate in the plate is calculated from the element tables.
Fig 5.4 Deformed model after laminate bending due to uniform pressure load
5.3.1 ALL LONGITUDINAL FIBRES
45
Centre Crack 0-0-0-0
40 Top Interface
Bottom Interface
35
Centre Interface
30
G (J/m2)
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.5: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-0-0-0 laminate.
400
Centre Crack 90-90-90-90
Top Interface
350
Bottom Interface
300 Centre Interface
250
G (J/m2)
200
150
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.6: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-90-90-90 laminate.
Due to the symmetric nature of crack when at centre interface, the amount of resistance to
deformation is more. When the crack is at the top or bottom interface, the required energy
to propagate the crack is lesser. Due to the constraints on the bottom layer, forces develop
in opposite direction, hence propelling easier crack growth.
5.3.3 SYMMETRIC FIBRE ORIENTATION
180
Centre Crack 0-90-90-0
160 Top Interface
Bottom Interface
140
Centre Interface
120
G (J/m2)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.7: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-90-90-0 laminate.
160
Centre Crack 90-0-0-90
Top Interface
140
Bottom Interface
120
Centre Interface
100
G (J/m2)
80
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
-20
a (mm)
Fig 5.8: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-0-0-90 laminate.
The symmetric nature of the orientation, the energy required at bottom and top surfaces is
almost the same amount. Minor variations in the value of G are only a result of constraints
applied. And also, it is easier to open up a crack at the interface of 0-0 fibres than 90-90.
5.3.4 ANTISYMMETRIC FIBRE ORIENTATION
180
Centre Crack 0-90-0-90
160 Top Interface
Bottom Interface
140
Centre Interface
120
G (J/m2)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.9: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 0-90-0-90 laminate
80
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
-20
a (mm)
Fig 5.10: Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ from an edge crack with 90-0-90-0 laminate.
The resistance when the top layer is oriented 00 is greater than when oriented at 900.
5.4 CASE TWO: LINE LOADING
A line load of 1000N is applied on the line along the centre of the laminate, parallel
to the supported end.
Fig. 5.12 Deformed model for centre crack opening at centre interface
Analysis of Results:
The graphs 5.13-5.18 show the constant trend of the amount of energy required to open
up the crack to be a continuous increasing curve with respect to the crack length.
5.4.1 All Longitudinal Fibres
300
250
G (J/m2)
200
150
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.13 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-0-0-0 laminate.
2500
2000
G (J/m2)
1500
1000
500
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.14 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 90-90-90-90
laminate.
5.4.3 SYMMETRIC FIBRE ORIENTATION
1000
800
G (J/m2)
600
400
200
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.15 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-90-90-0
laminate.
1000
800
G (J/m2)
600
400
200
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.16 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 90-0-0-90
laminate.
5.4.4 ANTISYMMETRIC FIBRE ORIENTATION
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.17 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with 0-90-0-90
laminate.
1000
G (J/m2)
800
600
400
200
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
a (mm)
Fig 5.18 Variation of ‘G’ with respect to ‘a’ of opening a centre crack with90-0-90-0
laminate
6
INTRODUCTION
The energy required for the growth of a crack under shear and opening conditions is
analysed for a four layered cross ply unidirectional fibre reinforced composite laminate
with delamination at two different locations (edge crack and centre crack) using
Trend Pattern
Edge Crack
The energy required to shear the crack in the laminate under shear follows an increasing
trend until a certain crack length and then decreases as the length of the crack increases.
When in opening mode, the energy required to open up the crack almost follows a linear
increasing trend until a definitive crack length and then shows a parabolic growth.
Centre Crack
The energy required to shear and also open up the crack are in a progressively in a
It is much safer to have centre crack structures than those with an edge crack.
Transverse fibres are safer than longitudinal fibres in the case of presence of a
SCOPE
The above analysis can be extend at various levels
REFERENCES
[1]. Kedward, K.T., 1995. Mechanical Design Handbook. (ed.) Rothbart, H.A., Harold, A.
[2]. Pagano, N.J., Schoeppner, G.A., 2000. Delamination of polymer matrix composites:
[3]. Tay, T.E., Shen, F., 2002. Analysis of delamination growth in laminated composites with
[4]. Crasto, A.S., Kim, R.Y., 1997. Hygrothermal influence on the free-edge delamination of
ASTM STP 1285. (ed.) Armanios, E.A. American Society for Testing and Materials,
[5]. Bolotin, V.V., 1996. Delaminations in composite structures: Its origin, buckling,
[7]. Greenhalgh, E., Singh, S., 1999. Investigation of the failure mechanisms for
[9]. Robinson, P., Hodgkinson, J.M., 2000. Interlaminar fracture toughness. Mechanical
[10]. Hashemi, S., Kinloch, A.J., Williams, J.G., 1990a. The analysis of interlaminar
London Series A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 427 (1872), pp.
173-199.
[11]. Kusaka, T., Hojo, M., Mai, Y.W., et al., 1998. Rate dependence of mode I
thin films at high stress levels. International Journal of Fracture 110 (4), pp. 371-385.
[13]. Glaessgen, E.H., Raju, I.S., Poe, C.C., 2002. Analytical and experimental studies
carbon fibre reinforced plastics at multidirectional ply interfaces under static and
cyclic loading. Plastics Rubber and Composites Processing and Applications 27 (5), pp.
220-226.
[18]. Olsson, R., Thesken, J.C., Brandt, F., Jonsson, N., Nilsson, S., 1996. Investigations of
[19]. Compston, P., Jar, P.Y.B., 1999. The influence of fibre volume fraction on the mode
[20]. Tanaka, K., Tanaka, H., 1997. Stress-ratio effect on mode II propagation of
Fatigue and Fracture 6, ASTM STP 1285. (ed.) Armanios, E.A. American Society for
[21]. Dahlen, C., Springer, G.S., 1994. Delamination growth in composites under
[22]. Timoshenko, S. and Goodier, J.: 1970, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw Hill.
[23]. Inglis, C.: 1913, Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp corners,
[24]. Kelly, A.: 1974, Strong Solids, second edn, Oxford University Press.
[25]. Gordon, J.: 1988, The Science of Structures and Materials, Scientific American
Library.
[26]. Westergaard, H.: 1939a, Bearing pressures and cracks, J. Appl. Mech.
[27]. Hillerborg, A. and Mod´eer, M. and Petersson, P.E.: 1976, Analysis of crack
formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite
[28]. Baˇzant, Z. and Cedolin, L.: 1991, Stability of Structures, Oxford University Press.
[29]. Pipes, R.B., Pagano, N.J., 1970. Interlaminar stresses in composite laminates under
laminates under inplane loading. Journal of Composite Materials 5 (JUL), pp. 354-360.
[31]. Herakovich, C.T., Renieri, G.D., Brinson, H.F., 1976. Finite element analysis of
[32]. Wang, A.S.D., Crossman, F.W., 1977. Some new results on edge effect in symmetric
[33]. Wang, S.S., Choi, I., 1982. Boundary-layer effects in composite laminates: I Free-
[34]. Wang, S.S., Choi, I., 1983. The interface crack between dissimilar anisotropic
pp. 169-178.
[35]. Irwin, G.R., 1958. Fracture I. Handbuch der Physik, VI. (ed.) Flüge, S.
[38]. Camanho, P.P., Dávila, C.G., 2002. Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for
the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA-Technical Paper
[39]. Kim, I.G., Kong, C.D., Uda, N., 2002. Generalized theoretical analysis method
[40]. Krueger, R., 2002. The virtual crack closure technique: history, approach and
[41]. Caiazzo, A.A., Costanzo, F., 2001. Modeling the constitutive behavior of
[42]. Rand, O., 2001. A multilevel analysis of solid laminated composite beams.
[43] Villaverde, N.B., 2004. Variable mix mode delamination in composite laminate
[45] Daniel, Isaac M., Ishai, O. 2006. Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials,
Oxford University Press.