You are on page 1of 33

708

CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –


TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS -
ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY AND
TREATMENT MODALITIES –
LITERATURE REVIEW *

DESORDENS CRÂNIOMANDIBULARES -
ASPECTOS ANATÔMICOS, FISIOLÓGICOS,
PATOLÓGICOS E FORMAS DE TRATAMENTO -
REVISTA DA LITERATURA

Gissa Alexandra Nuñez BALDERRAMA **


Gustavo Lopes TOLEDO ***
Clovis MARZOLA ****
Daniel Luiz Gaertner ZORZETTO ****
João Lopes TOLEDO-FILHO ****
Marcos Maurício CAPELARI ****
Cláudio Maldonado PASTORI ****

____________________________________________________________________
* Based on a monograph submitted to the Posgraduate Program in Oral and Maxillo Facial Surgery
and Traummatolog, São Paulo Association of Dental Surgeons (APCD) - Bauru-São Paulo
state, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Specialist degree, 2010.
** Specialist in Oral and Maxillo Facial Surgery and TraumMatology. Author of the monograph.
*** Professor of the Residency and Specialization in Buco Maxillo Facial Surgery and
Traummatology of the Brazilian Oral and Maxillo Facial Surgery and Traummatology
School, Base Hospital of São Paulo, Association of Dental Surgeons (APCD)-Bauru-São
Paulo State. Supervisor of the monograph.
****Professors of the Residency and Specialization in Bucco Maxillo Facial Surgery and
Traummatology of the Brazilian Oral and Maxillo Facial Surgery and Traummatology
School, Base Hospital of São Paulo, Association of Dental Surgeons (APCD)-Bauru-São
Paulo State
709
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

ABSTRACT

There are countless problems related to the temporomandibular joint


known as temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD). Successful treatment of
patients with TMD depends mainly on a correct diagnosis which will lead us to the
best treatment plan among the many options found in the literature as physical
therapy, medication, interoclusal devices and arthroscopy, eminectomy and articular
devices, divided into conservative and surgical type of treatment, respectively. Thus,
this work aims to describe through literature review some aspects involving the
temporomandibular joint disorders most commonly diagnosed, the choice of
treatment more appropriate to the type of disorder and mainly to create the ability to
discern when conservative or surgical treatment are indicated.

RESUMO

Inúmeros são os problemas relacionados com a Articulação


Temporomandibular, as conhecidas Desordens Craniomandibulares (DCM). O
sucesso do tratamento dos pacientes portadores de DCM depende, principalmente, da
realização de um correto diagnóstico, que quando bem feito, nos conduz a escolha do
melhor plano de tratamento dentre as inúmeras opções encontradas na literatura tais
como: fisioterapia, tratamento medicamentoso, dispositivos Interoclusais e
Artroscopia, Eminectomia e dispositivos articulares, divididos em conservador e
cirúrgico, respectivamente. Sendo assim, este trabalho tem como objetivo uma
revista da literatura para o conhecimento da anatomia, fisiologia, patologias, DCM
mais comumente diagnosticadas, a escolha do melhor tratamento condizente com o
tipo de desordem em particular. Sobretudo, obter a capacidade de discernir quando é
necessário um tratamento conservador e um tratamento cirúrgico.

Uniterms: Temporomandibular joint; Craniomandibular disorder; Mini-anchors.

Unitermos: Articulação temporomandibular; Desordens Craniomandibulares; Mini-


âncora.

INTRODUCTION
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ), part of the stomatognathic
system, along with maxilla and mandible, nerves and glands, is one of the most
important joints in the human body. Given its complexity, is subject to interference
and depends on the anatomical and functional stability of the entire stomatognathic
system (MACIEL; TURELL, 2003).
The TMJ is a bicondyloid synovial joint, formed by the squamous
portion of temporal bone and mandibular condyle. These two elements are
surrounded by a bony capsule of fibrous tissue brought by a disc consisting of
connective tissue. This disc is fixed to the joint capsule and in the condylar process
margin. The joint cavity is divided in superior and inferior compartments
(HEFFEZ; MAFEE; ROSENBERG, 1995; OKESON, 2000 and MACIEL;
TURELL, 2003).
Functionally, it allows the mandible to open, close, protrude, retried,
and to perform lateral movements as well as the combination of all. To make this
710
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

dynamic mechanism, the condylar process performs rotation and translation on its
long axis through the action of muscles and ligaments attached to bone and fibrous
structures that surround it (NORMAN; BRAMLEY, 1990; SARNAT; LASKIN,
1992 and DAWSON, 1993).
Among the structures responsible for movements of TMJ the articular
disc is emphasized. The articular disc has a convex shape in its upper portion and
concave in its lower portion dividing the joint into two functionally distinct units.
The supradiscal compartment performs the movements of translation since it is more
mobile and loose allowing sliding movements, on the other hand, the infradiscal
performs rotational movement. It joins the head of the condylar process through
collateral ligaments, sometimes called discal ligaments. The lateral discal ligament
connects the lateral end to the extreme lateral side of the articular disc. The discal
medial ligament connects the medial end of the disc to the medial pole of the
condylar process (MANNS; DÍAZ, 1983; DAWSON, 1993 and OKESON, 2003).
On many occasions the temporomandibular joint harmony is broken
creating temporomandibular disorders (TMD) or Craniomandibular Disorders as well
(CMD). In this context, the TMD include a number of diseases whose etiology is
mostly multifactorial. Furthermore, the complex anatomy and dynamics of TMJ
makes the treatment considerably challenging (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ,
1988; GRAY, 1995 and MORAIS; OLIVEIRA; OLIVEIRA, 2001).
This study was performed using references on the therapy of
Craniomandibular Disorders, through a literature review, in this manner this paper
aims to discuss the most important points related to TMJ such as anatomy aspects,
normal dynamics of ATM and physiological aspects, craniomandibular disorders and
the treatment of craniomandibular disorders.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Anatomic Considerations
The TMJ, according to the literature, appears as a set of anatomical
structures that aided by a group of muscles develops various movements in
mastication (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989;
OLIVEIRA, 1994 and GRAY, 1995). It is classified as a complex biaxial synovial
articulation, with its anatomical components such as the articular surfaces, the
articular disc, the capsules, ligaments, and synovial membranes (OLIVEIRA, 1994).
The joint surfaces are formed by a surface of the condyle and an articular surface of
the temporal bone (Figure 1) (FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989).
The bony parts of the ATM are the condyle, articular eminence and
glenoid fosse of the temporal bone. The articular processes can be defined as two
oval-shaped protrusions located in the posterior superior angle of the mandibular
ramus, whose major axis oriented obliquely dorso-medially, measuring
approximately 20 to 22 mm. They are convex on its sagittal and frontal aspects,
wide on its lateral aspect, and narrow medially. His side poles are rough and often
sharp, joining the ramus by a narrow, slightly bent forward portion of the neck of the
mandible, which holds a depression called the pterygoid fovea where the lateral
pterygoid muscle is inserted. The TMJ is surrounded by a fibrous capsule rather
weak, which allows large movements of the joint. It is attached above the articular
portion of the temporal bone and below the mandibular neck. This disc is quite
711
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

innervated, sensory, proprioceptive that relates to the auriculotemporal, posterior


deep temporal and masseteric nerves (Figures 2 and 3) (SICHER; DU BRUL,
1991).

Figure 1 - Skeletal components of the TMJ. (1) Mandibular condyle, (2) Articular Eminence of the
Temporal bone, (3) Articular disc, (4) lateral pterygoid muscle, (5) temporal muscle tendon,
(6) Auditory Canal.
Source - Figure taken from site: www.fosjc.unesp.br/anatomia/atm/ATM1-
1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.fosjc.unesp.br/anatomia/atm/ATM1.htm

Figure 2 – TMJ inervation.


Source - Figure taken from the website: www.fosjc.unesp.br/anatomia/quiz-
trigemeo/mandibular01.jpg&imgrefurl
712
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

Figure 3 - Articular capsule, temporomandibular ligament, sphenomandibular ligament.


Source - Figure taken from the website: http://www.fosjc.unesp.br/anatomia/atm/ATM6.jpg

Its blood supply is accomplished through the superficial temporal


artery branches and later branches of the maxillary artery posteriorly. Previously, the
posterior temporal artery, the masseter and lateral pterygoid, contribute to its
irrigation (Figures 4 and 5).

Figure 4 – Maxillary artery and its branches: anterior tympanic, deep auricular and middle meningeal
artery.
Source - Figure taken from the book: SOBOTTA, J. Atlas de anatomia humana. 18ª ed. Rio de
Janeiro: Ed.Guanabara Koogan, 1990.
713
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

Figure 5 - Venous supply: Pterygoid plexus, superficial temporal and maxillary.


Source - Figure taken from the book: SOBOTTA, J. Atlas de anatomia humana. 18ª ed. Rio de
Janeiro: Ed.Guanabara Koogan, 1990.

The articular eminence would also be defined as the articular tubercle


(GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY,
1995), however some authors are unanimous in considering that the articular tubercle
is a protrusion on the external end of the anterior root of the zygomatic process of the
temporal bone and therefore not articulated, serving for insertion of the capsular
ligaments. The articular eminence of the temporal is the transverse root of the
zygomatic arch. Prior to the articular fossa; its anatomic deviation determines the
trajectory of condylar movements (GRAY, 1973 SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; SICHER;
DU BRUL, 1991; DAWSON, 1993 and GRAY, 1995).
The mandibular fosse is situated below and in front of the external
acoustic meatus and is limited medially by the squamo tympanic fissure and
posteriorly by the temporal bone that forms the posterior border of the glenoid fossa.
It is a depression of varying depth, which in ventral-dorsal direction, extends from
the articular eminence until the anterior segment of the external acoustic meatus. In
the transverse direction, descends from the base of the zygomatic arch to the spine of
the sphenoid, but only the anterior portion is articular, while the posterior part forms
the anterior wall of external auditory canal. It is noted here that as active elements in
the process of the dynamics of the joint, the articular eminence and the mandible are
convex in their sagittal and lateral plane. The articular surface of the temporal bone
is also covered by fibrous tissue with few cartilage cells, free of vessels and nerves
that make it impossible to develop inflammation and scarring. Their nutrition occurs
by soaking of synovial fluids, however, dependent on the movement and in cases of
restriction there may occur degeneration of this tissue. The coverage of the
mandibular fossa, separating it from the middle cranial fossa, is always thin and
translucent, allowing concluding that it is not a part of functional pressure, making
sure that the functional pressure is between the condyle, the articular disc and
714
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

between the disc and articular eminence (GRAY, 1973 SPALTEHOLZ, 1988;
FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY, 1995).
The articular disc is a small fibrocartilaginous plate with a slightly
oval and italic "S" aspect in the sagittal section, it is concave anteriorly, relating to
the eminence and convex posteriorly, in contact with the mandibular fossa of the
temporal bone, and directed downward and forward. The disc divides the TMJ into
two parts, the central portion of the disc is devoid of vessels, and one that supports
the higher pressures. The peripheral portion is covered by synovial membrane,
richly vascularized (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; SICHER; DU BRUL,
1991 and GRAY, 1995).
The disc is slightly compressible, thick across its border, large in its
posterior perimeter and considerably narrower in its central portion. The
intermediate or central portion of the disk is thin at around 1 to 2 mm and is located
between the articular surfaces that support pressure. This portion of the disc consists
of a dense fibrous tissue completely avascular and aneural and, consequently, in any
type of lesion shows the character of irreversibility. The articular disc is attached to
the joint capsule and to the lateral and medial poles of the condyle by strong fibrous
loops. The anterior portion of the disc is connected to the anterior capsule with a
projection of the disc itself, which does not happen posteriorly, where there is an
extension of soft cushioning with two separate layers of fibers, placing it among the
structure of blood vessels and nerves. Its saddle shape in its upper portion is to
adjust to the cranial contour and its concavity in the bottom, to accommodate with
the articular process of mandible (Figure 6) (OLIVEIRA, 1994).

Figure 6 - (1) Articular disc (2) articular eminence, (3) Supradiscal compartment, (4) Condile, (5)
Articular Cartilage, (6) Infradiscal compartment; (7) Articular Capsule; (8) Retrodiscal
cushion; (9) External acoustic meatus; (10) lateral pterygoid muscle, (11) temporal muscle
tendon.
Source - Figure taken from website: www.fosjc.unsp.br/anatomia/atm/ATM2.htm
715
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

In an important study which intended to emphasize the action of the


lateral pterygoid muscle during the dynamics of TMJ via 22 human cadavers
concluded that:
1. The upper and medial fibers of the superior lateral pterygoid muscle
is inserted in the medial portion of the articular disc.
2. Approximately 29.5% of the fibers of the superior portion of the
muscle were inserted into the articular disc.
3. The portion of fibers that are inserted in the disc can be interpreted
as a tendon insertion in the articular disc and,
4. The proportion of muscle fibers embedded in the articular disc and
articular process are not influenced by age (NAIDOO; JUNIPER 1997).
Subsequently, the disk interface with the capsule is made by a spongy
pad called retrodiscal cushion that curves inferiorly and laterally from the head of the
mandible.
The two posterior layer bands are called bilaminar zone (GRAY,
1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; SICHER; DU BRUL, 1991 and GRAY, 1995). The
superior attaches to the post-glenoid process and is secured by elastic fibers that have
a retractable effect to the disc, its medial portion is the true posterior limit of the
joint. The bottom blade curves downward to the side of the condyle merging into the
capsule at the inferior articular joint space in the mandibular neck.
Its function is to supply the anatomical deficiency between the joint
surfaces of the condyle and articular eminence of the temporal bone, which are
convex, interposing between them as a "cushion" of relative elasticity. Laterally, the
disc fuses with the deep fibers of the masseter muscle (GRAY, 1973;
SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY, 1995).
The articular capsule or ligament is a thin fibrous membrane that
surrounds the joint and unites its parts. It consists of connective tissue, rich in
collagen fibers which do not stretch. It is represented by two layers, a fibrous loose
and tough membrane that is external and a synovial membrane that forms the inner
layer of the capsule. The deepest is inserted within the limit of the articular disc,
determining the existence of the supra and infradiscal articulations.
Their upper limit in the temporal bone are on the anterior portion of
the articular tubercle anteriorly, in the squamous tympanic suture posteriorly,
laterally in the articular tubercle and zygomatic arch and medially at the base of the
spine of the sphenoid. Their lower limits are narrower, being limited to the condyle,
standing in the contour of the articular surface except for the posterior part, where the
insertion is approximately 5 mm below the fibrocartilage coverage, reaching the neck
of the mandible. Thus, the back of the neck is included in the joint (GRAY, 1973;
SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY, 1995).
Due to the characteristics of the joint capsule, a considerable range of
motion and even dislocation of the condyle without its rupture is allowed. The
posterior portion of the joint, the retrodiscal, is richly innervated and vascularized,
and of undoubted importance in the pathogenesis of craniomandibular disorders
(FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989).
The lateral ligament can be considered as the one truly functional in
the TMJ (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; SICHER; DU BRUL, 1991;
DAWSON, 1993 and GRAY, 1995).
This function of limiting movement or medial displacement of the
condyle is made by a bony prominence belonging to the temporal bone, in the medial
716
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

wall of the articular cavity of the temporal glenoid fossa. Although it is believed that
this ligament limits the retrusive movements of the mandible, protecting the tissues
of the posterior region of the ATM (DAWSON, 1993).
The medial ligament is described as small in volume and of dubious or
questionable function, lifting off the base of the spine of the sphenoid bone and
descending obliquely backward and outward, inserting in the posterior medial part of
the neck of the mandible, 10 to 15 mm below the articular line (GRAY, 1973;
SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY, 1995).
The combination of ligaments works as a valuable protection
considering that the effects of trauma which should be directed to the articular
structure against the tympanic plate or on the roof of the middle cranial fossa reaches
initially the anterior portion of the mandible producing fractures in the symphysis
and / or in the mandibular angle (DAWSON, 1993).
The posterior ligament is represented by elastic fibers that connect the
squamous tympanic fissure to the neck of the condyle and the posterior edge of the
disc. It is responsible for limiting the excursion of the mandibular condyle and disc in
the protrusion of the mandible (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; FIGÚN;
GARINO, 1989 and GRAY, 1995).
In addition to the described ligaments there are accessory ligaments
(DAWSON, 1993).
Described as a group of fibrous elements in an apparent anatomical
and functional relation to the structures of the TMJ (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ,
1988; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY, 1995).
These ligaments would be the sphenomandibular the estilomandibular
and the pterigomandibular.
The temporomandibular ligament has its fibers oriented in such a way
that during movements of the articulation these fibers are not distended or relaxed
indicating that the TMJ ligaments do not restrict the funcitonal movement of the jaw
and are not necessary for the functioning of the joint. Although it is believed that
this ligament limits the retrusive movements of the mandible, protecting the tissues
of the posterior region of the TMJ (SICHER; DU BRUL, 1991 and DAWSON,
1993).
Sphenomandibular ligament is a remnant of Meckel's cartilage. Rises
from the angular spine of the sphenoid bone and petrotympanic fissure and then run
backwards and externally to insert in the mandibular lingula. This ligament is
passive during jaw movement, keeping on the same stress intensity during the
opening and closing of the mouth (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; SICHER;
DU BRUL, 1991; DAWSON, 1993 and GRAY, 1995).
The stylomandibular ligament is a dense concentration located in the
cervical fascia, extending from the styloid process to the mandibular angle, covering
the outer surface of the styloid process, inserting to the bone connecting in the
posterior surface of the mandibular angle, spreading anteriorly as a broad fascial
layer covering the inner surface of the medial pterygoid muscle (SICHER; DU
BRUL, 1991 and DAWSON, 1993).
The stylomandibular ligament is loose when the jaws are closed or
when the mandible is at rest and relax remarkably when the mouth is open, because
the angle of the mandible swings up and back, while the condyle slides down and
forward (Figure 7) (SICHER; DU BRUL, 1991 and DAWSON, 1993).
717
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

Figure 7 - (1) Esfenomandibular ligament (2) Temporomandibular ligament; (3) Articular capsule; (4)
Styloid apophysis (5) Estilomandibular ligament.
Source: Figure taken from website www.auladeanatomia.com/artrologia/atm.htm

The synovial membranes create internally the articular supradiscal and


infradiscal spaces. The supradiscal is a cylinder limited superiorly by the insertion of
the articular capsule in the temporal bone and inferiorly implants into the upper
surface of the articular disc. The infradiscal extends from the edge of the articular
disc to the mandibular neck. In case of perforation of the articular disc, there is a
communication between these two cavities. It is abundant in the vascularized and
innervated portions of the upper and lower surfaces of the retrodiscal area. The
supradiscal space is bulkier than the infradiscal, both joint compartments are
irrigated by the synovial fluid, which is responsible for alleviating the friction of
joint surfaces (GRAY, 1973; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY, 1995).
The TMJ receives vascularization from the posterior temporal and
masseteric deep arteries. The middle and posterior surfaces of TMJ are irrigated by
branches of the maxillary artery, anterior tympanic artery, and middle meningeal.
The posterior and lateral sides of the joint are irrigated by branches of the superficial
temporal artery. The veins that drain the joint arising into the pterygoid plexus,
superficial temporal and maxillary arteries correspond to the arteries that irrigate it
(GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY,
1995).
Regarding the innervation was observed that the anterior portion of
the TMJ is innervated by the anterior branch of the mandibular nerve (branch of the
trigeminal nerve) and branches of the masseteric nerve. The posterior portion of the
TMJ is innervated by branches of the auriculotemporal nerve from the posterior
division of the mandibular branch of trigeminal nerve (GRAY, 1973;
SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; FIGÚN; GARINO, 1989 and GRAY, 1995).

TMJ DYNAMICS

Functionally, the TMJ allows the mandible to be able to make opening


and closing movements including protrusion, retrusion and lateral movements as well
718
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

as the combination of all. To make this dynamic, the condylar process performs
rotation and translation due to the presence of muscle, bone and fibrous structures.
The major muscles involved in this condition are the temporal
muscles, which guide the condyles superiorly in the fossa, the masseter and medial
pterygoid, the lateral inferior pterygoid muscles in an anterior and superior position
guiding the condiles horizontally on the posterior wall of articular eminence
(SARNAT; LASKIN, 1992 and MACIEL, 1996).
It is known that the mandible is the only mobile bone of the face being
attached to the skull base through a double joint bilaterally.
The TMJ appears as the most complex articulation of the body
capable of performing sophisticated movements. The articulation assist in several
vital processes such as chewing, swallowing, speech and posture and it is protected
by the articular disc and ligaments formed from collagen fibers (CABEZAS, 1997).
According to the literature the presence of ligaments causes restriction
of certain functional movements as rotation and translation, within acceptable limits
for proper function and integrity of the joint capsule, ligaments and muscles
(MOLINA, 1995).
Some pathological changes observed in the TMJ result from
functional overload to the ligaments since they do not have great capacity for
dimensional changes. The inferior joint is composed of condyle and articular disc
inserted by ligaments that form the disc-condyle complex where the rotation occurs.
The upper joint is formed by the disc-condyle complex that articulates with the
mandibular fossa, where the translation occurs (OKESON 1991).
Temporal, masseter, medial pterygoid and lateral mandibular muscles
are essencial in mandibular masticatory movement as others, as mentioned (Figure
8) (DOUGLAS 1988).

Figure 8 – Muscles responsible for movement of the joint.


Source - Figure extracted from website: http://www.miologia.hpg.com.br/atm2.jpg

The temporal muscle is well known to elevate the jaw when its
anterior fibers contract in maximum aperture and subsequent retraction of the
mandible by the posterior fibers and acts in the contralateral displacement and
elevation of the mandible. Its dorsal fibers contract at translation with occlusion and
719
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

the ventral fibers contract at rotation with occlusion. This muscle is crucial in
determining muscle tone in the postural position of mandible.
The masseter muscle helps not only in the mandibular anterior
projection but also in lateral movements bilaterally. The medial pterygoid muscle, as
well as masseter muscle lifts the jaw acting in protrusion and lateral movements
(SARNAT; LASKIN, 1992).
Another important group is that of the depressor muscles which have
the basic function of opening the mouth and also execute other secondary functions.
This group is divided into lateral pterygoid and digastrics muscles, and also the
mylohyoid and geniohyoid muscles. The lateral pterygoid muscle is responsible for
the opening of the mouth, anterior projection and movements of laterality, with
unilateral contraction and contralateral loosening.
The digastric muscle, a suprahyoid muscle, is primarily a depressor,
like all the suprahyoid muscles. It is important to emphasize that mouth opening
starts with the lateral pterygoid and followed by the digastrics muscle. The other
muscles responsible for mouth opening are the following. The geniohyoid muscle
which is also suprahyoid and mandible depressor. When the mouth is closed it pulls
the hyoid upward, lowering the floor of the mouth and making swallowing easier. It
is also responsible for retruding the mandible as the digastrics (Figure 9) (SICHER;
DU BRUL, 1991; SARNAT; LASKIN, 1992 and MACIEL, 1996).

Figure 9 – Digastric Muscle.


Source - Figure extracted from website: www.fotosearch.com

More than a suprahyoid muscle, the mylohyoid depresses the jaw


when hyoid bone is fixed, otherwise it helps swallowing pulling the hyoid bone up,
as does the geniohyoid (Figure 10) (SICHER; DU BRUL, 1991; SARNAT;
LASKIN, 1992 and MACIEL, 1996).
According to this becomes clear the action of the mandibular elevator
muscles which assisted by ligaments induce the mandibular condyle to articulate
with the glenoid fosse and maintain its movement. Despite the pressure between the
condyle, disc and glenoid fosse comply with the activity of the elevator muscles
some pressure is always maintained to prevent separation of joint surfaces. If the
contact between them is lost, displacement may occur.
720
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

Figure 10 – Suprahyoid muscles.


Source - Figure extracted from the website of Anatomy:
www.transtornostemporomandibulares.blogspost.com/20.htm

During mouth opening, the articular disc spins posteriorly near the
mandibular condyle, while the disc-condyle complex moves forward and down, close
to the articular eminence. The posterior ligament tension during half opening of the
mouth helps to bring back the disc rotating around the condyle (SOLBERG 1989).
Anteriorly to disc-condyle complex is the lateral pterygoid muscle
with its upper and lower fibers. It is believed that the lower portion of the pterygoid
is activated along with the depressor muscles of the mandible during mouth opening
(CABEZAS 1997).
During the full mouth opening, slide of the disk is nullified by the
stretching limit of the muscle, by resistance of the capsule and the lack of articular
surface available. The exaggerated movement of mandible opening beyond this
point causes subluxation, as the irregular, spasmodic movement of the disc-condyle
complex on the non articular surfaces. When the mouth is opened completely, the
soft tissue is sucked into the posterior lateral sides of the joint (BARROS; RODE
1995).
Mouth opening or mandibular depression is performed by bilateral
contraction of both lateral pterygoid muscles, with the assistance of the digastric
anterior and milohyoid. At the same time, in each TMJ, the disc-condyle complex is
moved down the articular eminence, leading to a stretch of the superior retrodiscal
compartment, resulting in posterior movement of the articular disc in the mandibular
head or condyle (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; SICHER; DU BRUL,
1991; SARNAT; LASKIN, 1992; GRAY, 1995 and MACIEL, 1996).
In the first phase of opening there is a small movement of the condyle,
which rotating around its axis determines the rotational movement. In the opening
sequence, the entire disc-condyle structure slides along the posterior wall of articular
eminence, characterizing the movement of translation. It is reported that during
closure of the mouth, the basic contraction function of the superior lateral pterygoid
muscle appears to be to coordinate the return of the articular disc smoothly to its
resting position (MACIEL 1996).
721
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

During closure the joint receives the maximum tension. At this point,
sudden disruptive forces are created on the condyle, by the resistance of the bolus.
The activity in the upper fibers of the lateral pterygoid muscle along with the
mandible elevator muscles produces an anterior component of strain on the disc and
causes it to move forward. The author claims that during closing, the disc acts as a
wedge in motion to ensure full contact between the components of articulation for
maximum function (SOLBERG 1989).
During the opening and closing of the mandible, disc and condyle
move together which is not determined by insertion of the ligaments, but for two
main reasons: morphology of the disc and intra-articular pressure. The protrusion is
achieved by simultaneous contraction of the bilateral inferior branches of the lateral
pterygoid muscle. The retrusion of the mandible is accomplished by the middle
portion of the middle temporal muscle and suprahyoid, perhaps with some assistance
from the deep portion of the masseter and posterior branch of the temporal muscle
(SICHER; DU BRUL, 1991).
The movement of the mandible to the left or right side involves the
contraction of the lower lateral pterygoid muscle on the opposite side, aided by the
posterior and middle fibers of the temporalis muscle on the same side. For example,
the movement of the jaw to the left involves the contraction of the right inferior
lateral pterygoid muscle, assisted by the middle and posterior fibers of the temporalis
muscle on the left. As this movement is accomplished, the disc-condyle complex is
rotated on the left and relocated on the right side of the TMJ. Usually, the lateral
excursion is formed in combination with protrusive excursion, producing a
anterolateral dislocation of the mandible (SICHER; DU BRUL, 1991; SARNAT;
LASKIN, 1992 and MACIEL, 1996).
The morphology of the disc and intra-articular pressure always present
ensure maintenance of the condyle in the intermediate thinner disc zone. If there is
any change in morphology of the disc or a change in intra-articular pressure, the
dynamic condyle-disc can be changed and, indeed, is the beginning of disc disorder
interference (CABEZAS 1997).
To understand the biomechanics of the joint, rotational movement
between the disc and head of the mandible or condyle and translation between the
upper surface of the disc and articular eminence should be carefully studied,
especially its relation to dental occlusion.
Because the mandible is unable to achieve full opening through only a
hinge-like movement, a combination of both, rotation and sliding motion, come to
characterize most of the mandibular movements (DOUGLAS, 1988; OKESON,
1991).
During movement, the stability of the TMJ is provided by anterior and
posterior rotation of the disc which keeps its intermediate zone between the articular
process of the mandible and the temporal articular eminence. The superior
retrodiscal zone rotates the disc posteriorly and the superior lateral pterygoid muscle
moves the disc in an anterior direction (DOUGLAS, 1988).
The translation cycle starts from the rest position, consisting of an
earlier stage, in which the disc-condyle complex moves down and forward along the
eminence and a return phase in which it moves up and returns to its resting position.
In this position, the thin intermediate zone of the disc is maintained between the
articular process of the mandible and the temporal articular eminence. The upper
retrodiscal structure is relaxed at rest position, but as the disc-condyle complex
722
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

moves forward towards the articular eminence, it becomes active, then retracting the
disc posteriorly to the head or condyle. This action prevents the disc from being
displaced anteriorly during the full opening of the mouth. During the previous phase,
the superior lateral pterygoid muscle is inactive.
In the return phase, the upper retrodiscal blade becomes inactive and
the superior lateral pterygoid muscle contracts to spin the disc above the condyle.
With their integration into the neck of the articular process of the mandible, the
superior lateral pterygoid muscle also exerts some control over the movement of the
disc-condyle complex at the return stage (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988;
OKESON, 1991 and GRAY, 1995).
The articular surfaces of the synovial joint require continuous contact
at all times to maintain stability. Since the TMJ articular surfaces are not directly
connected, this contact is achieved by muscular action. In the rest position, joint
stability is achieved by the muscle tone in the elevator muscles. During translation,
interposed between the posterior temporal and inferior portion of the lateral
pterygoid the disc-condyle complex and the temporal articular eminence remain in
firm contact. Occlusion of the teeth provides the necessary stability in maximum
intercuspal position. The temporomandibular ligament does not contribute actively
to stabilize the joint, serving rather passively to limit the posterior and inferior
condylar displacement (GRAY, 1973; SPALTEHOLZ, 1988; OKESON, 1991 and
GRAY, 1995).
Perhaps the most important element in maintaining stability of the
joint is the position of the articular disc in relation to the articular process of the
mandible. This position depends in the contour of the central zone of the disc, as
well as in the antero-posterior motion of the disc. Another important factor is the
intra-articular pressure between the condyle and eminence. When teeth are occluded,
this pressure is increased, the disk space is reduced and the lower portion of the disc
thickness twists between the condyle and eminence. At rest, the opposite occurs;
intra-articular pressure is insignificant, the disk space is wide and the slightly thicker
portion of the disc spins to occupy or fill the space between the condyle and
eminence.
The intra-articular pressure can be divided into two types, active and
passive. The passive intra-articular pressure is the result of contraction of skeletal
muscles during function and is due to muscle tone that can be modified by gravity, is
also influenced by emotional stress, fatigue, illness and age (OKESON, 1991).
No discussion involving the biomechanics of the TMJ could be
complete without addressing the role of occlusion. Since most of the mandibular
movement does not involve dental contact, occlusion does not appear to directly
influence the function of the joint. The closure also does not play an important role
when the jaw is at rest because the teeth are not in touch, heads or condyles are
stabilized by muscle tone. Only when the teeth are tightly occluded, the relationship
between the teeth of the maxilla and mandible in fact occurs.
The optimal stable musculoskeletal joint position can be defined as
"one in which the head or condyles are in their most superior and anterior position in
the glenoid fossa, lying along the slope or posterior inclination of articular eminence,
with the articular disc properly superposed".
This is the best alignment to prevent injury to the articular structures,
when forces of great intensity are applied, this position is similar to the currently
most accepted definitions for centric relation (OKESON, 1998).
723
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ), ranked as the most complex of


the human body can be affected by the same diseases and disorders that affect other
joints of the musculoskeletal system, such as disc displacement, degenerative joint
disease (osteoarthritis), inflammatory arthritis and synovitis (WOLFE; SMYTHE;
YUNUS et al., 1990; MACIEL; WESTESSON; TURELL et al., 2003 e LASKIN;
GREENE; HYLANDER, 2006).
For the appropriate function of the temporomandibular joint, the very
temporomandibular joint, dental occlusion and neuromuscular balance must relate
harmoniously, but it does not always happen. During life, the individual can not
always maintain its stable stomatognathic system, being often submitted to dental
treatments, deficient anatomical restorations, unsatisfactory prosthetic devices,
untimely dental extractions, among others, causing occlusal maladjustments,
producing, consequently, damage to the entire masticatory apparatus (JUNQUEIRA,
1990).
The etiology of TMD is multifactorial, has no single cause, where
various aspects such as: changes in occlusion (tooth loss, tooth wear, loose or ill-
fitting dentures, caries, inappropriate restorations among others); traumatic or
degenerative alterations of the TMJ; skeletal problems ; psychological factors (cause
tension and increase muscle activity, generate spasm and fatigue) and deleterious
habits (nail biting, hand in support of mandible, inadequate posture of mandible,
smoking, biting objects, thumb sucking or pacifier, bruxism and others ) can be
harmful and lead to imbalance and disharmony of the TMJ and the entire
stomatognathic system.
The temporomandibular disorders (TMD) was suggested (BELL,
1982) and gained wide acceptance and popularity. The term includes not only
problems related to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), but also includes the
functional disturbances of the masticatory system (OKESON, 1997). Since the
symptoms are not always restricted to the temporomandibular joint, some authors
believe that a more collective term should be used, then going to the term
Craniomandibular Disorders (PAIVA; VIEIRA; COSTA et al., 1993).
Population studies have reported that about 70% of the population has
one or more symptoms of temporomandibular and muscular disorders. Although
most patients are women (5:1) when compared to men, the rate of symptoms in both
is only slightly different. Most patients seeking treatment are women between 20 and
40 years old (ASH; RAMFJOR; SCHMIDSEDER 1998).
Similarly to terminology and etiology, classification of
temporomandibular disorders has also been very diverse.
Based on the literature, the classification that seems to be most
accepted is that proposed (BELL, 1990 e LASKIN; GREENE; HYLANDER,
2006), which divides temporomandibular disorders in: A - Acute muscle disorders
(muscle spasm, myositis). B – Disc-condyle complex disorders. C - Inflammatory
disorders of TMJ. D - Changes in mandibular mobility. E - Changes in growth and
development.
The main signs and / or symptoms of TMD are pain in the masticatory
muscles or temporomandibular joint or in surrounding areas. The pain is
spontaneous or during chewing. There are also noises, limitation of opening,
724
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

uncoordinated movements, marked mandibular dental abrasions or frequent fractures


of teeth and / or restorations (TAKAHASHI; ARAÚJO 1995).
Other authors argue that the main symptoms are pain in the
preauricular area, temporal, pterygoid and masseter muscles sensitivity, popping in
the temporomandibular joint, eccentric movement limitations of mandible, sensitivity
to all cervical muscles and stomatognathic system (RHODEN; NICOLINI; SORDI
et al., 1992).
The most common initial symptom is localized pain in the masticatory
muscles or TMJ region, often exacerbated during chewing or during mandible
movements (SOVIEIRO; ABREU; CASTRO et al., 1997).
Other symptoms include earaches, headaches and pain in the face as
well as difficulty in swallowing, deviation of the mandible during opening,
modification in dental occlusion, small cracks to open and close the mouth, sensation
of locking of the jaw, pain in joint, face , shoulders and neck, asymmetry of the
mandible, facial asymmetry, micrognathia and macrognathia. Noises in the joint and
limitations in mandibular movements represent the clinical signs most frequently
observed. Other signs include tightness of the masticatory muscles and jaw locking
or dislocation (AGUIAR, 1988).

EVALUATION OF
CLINICAL SYMPTOMS

There are several diseases which can settle in the TMJ, although not
presenting defined etiology, it is believed that functional, structural and
psychological factors aspects are combined, featuring the multifactorial origin of this
dysfunction (SOVIEIRO; ABREU; CASTRO et al., 1997). The authors classified
it as (VALMASEDA; ESCOBA 2002):
1. Masticatory muscle disorders:
The disorders related to masticatory muscles are most often found on
temporomandibular disorders, some related to noxious stimuli that when disappear,
cease the related painful symptoms, although there are others who tend to follow a
chronic course for which treatment can be very complex (STEGENGA,
SCHOUTEN, 2007).
2. Protective muscle contraction:
In some situations, the muscle tone increases in response to central
nervous system in defense of certain sensory stimuli such as bruxism, constant
emotional tension, intubation, and others (OKESON, 1999). The stimulus may be
temporary or may cease with time simply displaying the etiologic agent and limiting
jaw movements (VALMASEDA; GAY ESCODA, 2002).
3. Muscle spasm:
It is a tonic prolonged contraction induced by central nervous system.
Does not fit as an inflammatory disorder caused by prolonged muscle contraction or
myofascial pain, as a central excitatory effect produced by a painful stimulus, or an
extrapyramidal effect originated from the use of phenothiazine. The contraction may
cause a malocclusion and limitation of mandible movement. The restriction is
extracapsular, there is a spasm of the elevator muscles although the lateral
movements may be perfectly normal, data of extreme importance in the final
diagnosis of a craniomandibular disorder (RAMFJORD, 1984).
725
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

4. Myofascial pain:
It is a prolonged painful disorder, characterized by areas of
hypersensitivity presenting muscular trigger points on which increased pain appears
when stimulation occurs. Some people associate it with the emotional stress,
systemic changes and deleterious postural habits. There is a slight deficit of
mandibular movements as well as in their velocity. This condition is defined by the
American College of Rheumatology as a muscular-skeletal disorder in which there
is widespread pain in more than 3 months at many points (18 or more) in 3 or 4 body
quadrants being one of the muscle-related disorders most commonly found in the
TMJ. Diagnosis is difficult since it must first rule out all possible organic causes.
Transcranial, transpharingeal or panoramic radiographs, computed tomography and
magnetic resonance imaging to determine the position of the intra-articular disc can
help in diagnosis (WOLFE; SMYTHE; YUNUS et al., 1990; DAWSON, 1993 e
BROWNE; EDMONDSON; ROUT, 1995). Laboratory tests may also be useful to
exclude systemic diseases such as, for example, rheumatoid arthritis.
5. Myositis:
It is a muscle inflammation due to local injury either by trauma,
infection or excessive physical activity. It is characterized by signs of inflammation
with pain at rest that increases as there is movement. It usually affects the elevator
muscles of the mandible producing limited mouth opening with lateral and protrusion
movement preserved (WOLFE; SMYTHE; YUNUS et al., 1990 and OKESON,
1992).
6. Disorders caused by interference of the articular disc:
Due to an overload in TMJ there is a decrease in joint space leading to
a collapse of the disc in relation to the articular space. The causes of adhesions are
dental clenching, bruxism, chewing hard foods. This fact is common in people with a
habit of nocturnal bruxism which is likely to be observed as a clear limitation of the
mouth opening resulting in a click sound in the joint when trying to open the mouth.
Disc displacements are caused by ligamentous disruption between the
intra-articular disc and condyle with consequent displacement of the lateral pterygoid
muscle with reduction in which the disc is moved anteriorly and medially or laterally
from its position, with reduction in total openness, often resulting in a noise and
without reduction and with limited opening, in which the disc is displaced from its
normal position to a position anterior and medial or lateral, with limited mandibular
opening (OKESON, 1997 and GARCIA; MADEIRA; PAIVA et al., 2008).

DEVELOPMENTAL, TRAUMATIC AND


CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

Condylar agenesis

In condylar agenesis concomitant problems may be present in other


parts of the mandible, middle and inner ear, temporal bone, parotid gland,
masticatory muscles and facial nerve. One way to diagnose this condition is by
means of a radiographic examination of the mandible (condyles projection) and TMJ
showing the level of involvement of associated bones. Treatment is often early
surgical / orthodontic settling the normal height of the mandible and restoration of
growth alteration (CABEZAS, 1997).
726
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

Condylar hypoplasia

The condylar hypoplasia may be in the majority of cases of infectious


origin or also congenital, or caused by trauma or irradiation during growth. One
consequence of this anomaly is the facial deformity as a result of the reduction of the
mandibular body deviating towards the affected side and enlargement of the
contralateral side. The diagnosis is made by anamnesis, physical and radiographic
evaluation. The surgical treatment is based on lengthening of the hypoplastic portion
or shortening of the normal side in the adult, followed by orthodontic treatment, to
establish a normal occlusion (CABEZAS, 1997).

Traumatic injuries

The articular fosse is rarely affected by condylar trauma due to the


absortion of the impact by the articular disc, the condylar head is angled forward
over the neck of the mandibular ramus, the neck of the condyle, being much thinner
than the ramus or the condyle tends to fracture first, thus protecting the thin roof and
the middle cranial fosse. The most common signs and symptoms observed are pre-
auricular pain, trismus, deviation of the mandible on the affected side, and usually
anterior open bite. The diagnosis is based on physical and radiological findings. The
treatment consisted of maxillomandibular fixation and sometimes open reduction
(BARROS; RODE 1995 and CABEZAS, 1997).

Luxation

Obvious feature here is the inability to close the mouth. Three forms
can be defined: 1. Simple acute episode. 2. Chronic recurrent dislocation. 3.
Permanent chronic dislocation. The first requires manual reduction under local
anesthesia and sedation or general anesthesia. Chronic recurrent dislocation and
chronic permanent dislocation require surgical treatment (BARROS; RODE 1995
and CABEZAS, 1997).

Ankylosis

The most common etiologic factor in TMJ ankylosis is possibly


trauma and / or rheumatoid arthritis, possibly congenital abnormalities, infections
and cancers, and the two most frequent types of joint involvement found are the
involvement of the joint alone or involving extra-articular structures. An important
factor in diagnosis is the condylar deformity, followed by narrowing and irregularity
of the intra-articular space or obliteration of the normal morphology of the bone.
Surgical treatment is mandatory (BARROS; RODE 1995 and CABEZAS, 1997).

Arthritis
Among the malignancies most commonly found in association with
TMJ arthritis is largely found due to some major origins such as: 1. Traumatic:
causes increase in intra-articular space or bleeding. In the case of children, parents
should be counseled about the possible delay of mandibular growth. Treatment is
727
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

symptomatic with restricted mobility of TMJ. 2. Infections: these are rare in the
TMJ. May be associated with systemic infections such as syphilis, gonorrhea or
tuberculosis, derived from local infection or through hematogenic route. It is
characterized by signs of inflammation and trismus. Treatment is with antibiotics
and anti-inflammatories, surgical drainage may eventually be required. 3.
Rheumatoid arthritis: it might not always be the first symptom. Clinically is
represented by bilateral pain, stiffness and joint swelling and limitation of movement.
Treatment is with NSAIDs, corticosteroids and eventually hydroxychloroquine and
penicilamide. Surgery may be necessary in the presence of ankylosis (RINTALA;
METSARANTA; SAAMANEN, 1997 and WOLFORD; PITTA; MEHRA,
2001).

Neoplasias

Chondromas, osteomas and osteochondromas are quite unusual but


might be found. The rarest benign tumors are: myxoma, fibrous dysplasia, giant cell
granuloma, sinovialoma, chondroblastoma, osteoblastoma and synovial
hemangioma. Malignant tumors are even more unusual fibrosarcoma,
chondrosarcoma and multiple myeloma. There may be invasion of TMJ by the
cheek or parotid tumors. Signs and symptoms are pain, limited movement of the
mandible and difficulty of dental occlusion. The x-ray shows bone destruction with
images of apposition and resorption. Surgical treatment is indicated (CZLUSNIAK;
FERES, 1993).

TREATMENT OF
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS
The treatment of TMD requires a thorough knowledge of the etiology
of the problem. Structural, functional and psychological aspects seem to be related,
determining a multifactorial origin. In order to promote a correct treatment plan a
proper diagnosis is required. It is vital to understand that patients respond differently
to different therapies, and the practitioner must adequate the treatment to the patient,
to obtain the best possible results.
There are actually several types of treatment for TMD, as they have a
variety of symptoms and have a multifactorial etiology. The treatment modalities
include: patient education and self-care, behavior modification (including relaxation
techniques), medications, physical therapy, occlusal stabilizing plates, occlusal
therapy (orthodontics, oral rehabilitation) and surgery (FAVERO, 1999;
STECHMAN NETO et al. 2001 e LASKIN; GREENE; HYLANDER, 2006).

1. Occlusal splints:
The occlusal splints have gained noticeable importance in the
treatment of TMD explained by the low-cost treatment and the achievement of a high
success rate. The occlusal splint stabilizer also called conventional occlusal splint or
Michigan is the most widely used because it causes less risk of irreversible occlusal
changes: as anterior open-bite, pathologic extrusions and tooth migration
(PORTERO; KERN; KUSMA et al., 2009). The use of occlusal splints is an
effective therapy for various types of structural disturbances of the masticatory
system (RAMJORD; ASH 1984). The splints are made of rigid or resilient
728
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

materials, the resilient splints can reduce the symptoms of TMD, but the hard acrylic
reduce symptoms more quickly and better, so the resilient splints are mainly
indicated for protection against injuries to the teeth (OKESON 2000). It is
important to observe that occlusal splints or so-called miorrelaxant splints have an
important role in the treatment of TMD, but they are not the only treatment option
and should never be considered that way, but as part of or even as an adjunct to other
therapies as medication or physical therapy and it is necessary that the etiology of the
disorder be well established.

2. Physical therapy:
The main goal here is to guide the patient, eliminate pain and
inflammation, restore muscle tone, relax muscles in hyperactivity and working those
into disuse, cryotherapy, electrotherapy, exercise and postural reeducation. Each one
provides physiological effects that will assist in reducing pain, muscle strengthening,
and postural reeducation (FÁVERO, 1999).
The TMJ disorders are basically composed of musculoskeletal,
orthopedic and neurological nature (KURODA; TANIMOTO; IZAWA et al.,
2009). Injection of local anesthetic in trigger points and physiotherapy treatment
modalities are used recently, in these types of disorders. This is because these
approaches have a long history of success in treating problems similar to those of
TMJ, in different parts of the body (FARELLA; MICHELOTTI; GARGANO et
al., 2000 and MURAYAMA; STUGINSKI-BARBOSA; MORAES, 2009).
A variety of techniques is responsible for the physical treatment
among these are thermotherapy and the use of ultrasound. Thermotherapy the heat
causes an impaired vasodilatation in tissues and leads to reduction of symptoms. The
cooling therapy promotes relaxation of the contracted muscle and so relieving the
associated pain (OKESON, 2000).
The ultrasound produces a temperature increase in the tissue interface
and affects the tissue more deeply than hot surfaces, increases blood flow in deep
tissues and improves flexibility and extensibility of connective tissues.
Between the physiological and therapeutic effects: increased
metabolism, increased blood supply, effects on muscle tissue, effects on
inflammatory process, and decrease pain (BASSANTA, 1997).
The use of laser as a physical therapy resource in the treatment of
TMJ dysfunction is being increasingly used, due to several advantages, as well as
acting as a healing factor and supporting tissue reorganization, it is a resource that
produces rapid response to treatment, being easy to handle, and can be used both in
acute and chronic pain, even in the absence of medication, it also promotes analgesy
(LASKIN, 2007).
The cold laser speeds up the synthesis of collagen, increases vascular
tissue, decreases the number of microorganisms and decreases pain (OKESON,
2000).
The therapeutic effects are: analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anti-
edematous effect and healing effect, the first step of treatment is to relieve pain, the
effect being sought by the therapist (FAVERO, 1999).
After a literature review, authors have concluded that the
recommended treatments for craniomandibular disorders are the use of drugs,
physical therapy procedures, muscle relaxation, in addition to the correction of dental
occlusion, using or not splints.
729
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

As medication NSAIDs can be prescrit and is generally the most


suitable for the treatment of TMJ internal derangement and myofascial pain, and
sometimes administered with benzodiazepine (DONALDSON; KROENING, 1979;
FAVERO, 1999 e PORTERO; KERN; KUSMA et al., 2009).

3. Speech therapy:
After physical therapy it is important to adequate the muscle tone and
mobility in order to relieve muscle pain, especially during inactivity, and also during
function (FÁVERO, 1999 e SZUMINSKI, 1999). Speech therapy consists in
advising the patient on what he can or can not do in certain phases of the proposed
therapy, thermotherapy to enable changes in oxygenation and muscle relaxation,
massage therapy and functional myotherapy.
This therapy is assisted by heat especially in chronic cases where there
is increased muscle tension. Its effect is relaxing and analgesic however to the same
authors, the application of heat is contraindicated in acute cases, the occurrence of
inflammatory processes, as well as in cases of neurological alterations, and
cryotherapy is indicated in cases of joint limitations, spasms relaxation and acute
pain processes. Exercises are essential to the maintenance of muscle function
without pain and producing muscle relief, with the principle of breath and is directly
related to the proprioceptive activity. The ultimate goal of the myofunctional therapy
is the adequacy of the stomatognathic function and relieve pain by better blood
supply afforded by the workouts (ANELLI; QUINTO; SANTOS, 1997;
BIANCHINI, 1998 e SZUMINSKI, 1999).

4. Pharmacological therapy:
The primary goal of pharmacological therapy is to control pain but
without eliminating it. Among the palliative drugs used to control pain and anxiety
caused by it are the anxiolytics that produce an calming and mild muscle relaxation
effect. For the TMD, the drugs should be prescribed at regular intervals for a
specific period, and at the end of this time, it is expected that the definitive treatment
improves the symptoms and is not necessary to extend the use of medication
(FAVERO, 1999). As described the indicated pharmacological treatment for TMD
is: analgesics, corticosteroids, and anxiolytics, to treat acute pain, NSAIDs, muscle
relaxants, local anesthetics for acute and chronic condition, and tricyclic
antidepressants for chronic pain (OKESON 2000).

5. Medication dynamics:
- Analgesics are indicated when the profound pain leads to the
disorder. NSAIDs are indicated to relieve moderate inflammatory conditions and
acute postoperative pain, especially musculoskeletal pain, promote symptomatic
relief and does not stop the progression of pathological tissue injury (ibuprofen). It is
indicated as a short term therapy, when anxiety and muscle spasms are prominent,
but the patient must be warned that prolonged use can cause side effects (FAVERO,
1999).
- Anti-inflammatory drugs suppress the body's overall response to the
irritation. Corticosteroids are not prescribed by their side effects.
- Anxiolytics are indicated for supportive therapy (diazepam). -
Muscle relaxants are given to prevent the increase in muscle activity associated with
TMD (mephesin, flexeril).
730
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

- Tricyclic Antidepressants require increased dosage therapy. It is


indicated as a short term therapy, when anxiety and muscle spasms are prominent,
but the patient must be warned that prolonged use can cause side effects. Local
anesthetics are used for localized pain in muscle, myofascial trigger point (lidocaine,
mepivacaine) (OKESON, 2000).

6. Surgical therapy:
In some situations, as previously mentioned, drug treatment can not by
itself be responsible for remission of symptoms and not fully deal with the problem
of the patient. So if conservative treatment for TMD is not effective, an option to
consider is TMJ surgery. Regarding the surgical treatment of TMD, some conditions
are imposed with respect to the modality in the surgical management: a joint surgery
should be performed only when conservative treatment was not effective; forms of
pre-surgical treatment should follow rational and appropriate criteria, and various
types of therapy should have been used before referring for surgery, patients who
have persistent chronic or acute signs and symptoms, in which pain is the main
component and the signs and symptoms are resistant to conventional therapy. The
TMJ surgery can be open or closed (MOLINA 1995; FAVERO 1999 and
CABEZAS 2006).
For some authors in closed TMJ surgery (arthroscopy or
arthrocentesis), a cannula is introduced with a video lens in the superior articular
joint space. A lateral incision can be made to allow introduction of instruments for
biopsy, remodeling of articular disc and lysis of adhesions. Among the indications is
failure of conservative treatment, uncertain diagnosis; disc displacement without
reduction, adhesions of the disc, and arthralgia. For these authors, open surgery of
the TMJ is the last treatment option to be considered. Arthrotomy can be performed,
discoplasty, discectomy. TMJ open surgery shall be performed only in much
selected cases. The decision to surgically treat a patient depends on the degree of
pathology he shows (Figure 11) (FAVERO, 1999; CARDOSO; BELMIRO;
VASCONCELOS et al., 2005 e CABEZAS, 2006).

Figure 11 - Articular eminence osteoplasty.


Source: Figure extracted from the article: CARDOSO, A. B.; BELMIRO, C. E.; VASCONCELOS et
al., Estudo comparativo da eminectomia e do uso de miniplaca na eminência articular para
tratamento da luxação recidivante da articulação temporomandibular. Rev. bras.
Otorrinolaringol., v.71, n.1, p.32-7, jan.,/fev., 2005.
731
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

The articular disc covers the head or condyle until the adhesion points,
medially and laterally, and its posterior margin is relatively thick. As much more
inclinated the eminence is, the thicker the distal edge of the disc becomes. The
functional position of the articular disc is a key factor in mandibular movements,
many disorders may result from its lack of coordination. Chronic dislocations of the
articular disc that could be treated invasively are currently treated with devices used
to stabilize it in the posterior aspect of the condyle. It is known as "Minianchor"
used years ago as: (1) articulate endosseous stabilizer, (2) restoration of the articular
disc, (3) condylar restoration, (4) restoration of the articular fosse and (5) total joint
prostheses.
Some of these devices have been used in the treatment of TMJ
disorders although in some situations they lead to functional impairment to patients.
Other factors should also be considered in choosing a articular device: (1)
Autoimmune disorders, (2) endocrine dysfunction, (3) biomechanical problems, (4)
nutritional deficiencies, and (5) genetic predispositions that lead to joint disturbs.
Considering this, it becomes relevant to highlight the actions of the devices used in
TMJ, knowing the dynamics of them and how they are responsible for functional
improvement of patient’s quality of life.

ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS
Endosseous implants can be used fixed in the condyle to assist in the
positioning of joint structures. Several approaches can be used to expose the
posterior condylar head to place a device known as minianchor (Mitek Mini Anchor,
Mitek, Inc., Norwood, Mass.) stabilizing the position of the articular disc. This
mininchor is composed of titanium with 5 mm in length and 1.8 mm wide. Two
titanium "wings" provide lateral intraosseous locking making suture viable in the
region and the formation of artificial ligaments (VAN LOON; DE BONT;
STEGENGA et al., 2002).
In a study conducted in 63 patients (59 women and 4 men), designated
group 1, with a mean follow up of 12.2 months (range 8 to 16 months), with 12
bilateral and 51 unilateral cases, a total of 114 joints. Group 2 consisted of 32
patients (30 women and 2 men) followed for a median of 25.5 months (range 18 to
36 months), 7 cases with unilateral and 25 bilateral, a total of 57 joints
(WOLFORD; PITTA; MEHRA et al., 2001).
In group 1, 57 of 63 patients (90%) had successful results with an
incisal opening of 35 mm or more, jaw and occlusal stability, and a significant
reduction in pain, with an average of 4.1 points in a -10 0-visual analog scale. In
group 2, 29 of 32 patients (91%) had successful results with the same criteria, with
an average decrease in pain of 4.0 points on a 0-to-10 visual analog scale. It was
demonstrated osseointegration in two condyles of the anchors in about 3 months after
implantation. Absence of inflammation or bone resorption was observed around
these devices (FIELDS; FRANCO; WOLFORD, 1997).
A cephalometric study was conducted to evaluate changes in long-
term positioning of the anchor in the condyle and the effects of the process on the
morphology of the condyle. The sample consisted of 29 patients (n = 54 joints) with
a mean age of 31.3 years (ranging from 15 to 52 years) and a mean follow up of 16.8
months (between 12 and 29 months). Positional changes were minimal for the
horizontal and vertical movement, with an average change of 0.01 mm (range, -1.5 to
732
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

1.5 mm). Condylar and ramus average height changes were -0.02 mm (range -1 to 1
mm). These studies support the use of Mitek mini anchors for the stabilization of the
articular disc of TMJ (CARDENAS; WOLFORD; GONCALVES et al., 1997).

USE OF MINI-ANCHORS FOR ARTICULAR DISC, FOSSA,


CONDYLE, AND COMPLETE ARTICULAR REPOSITIONING

Numerous materials are used for either partial or total reconstruction


of the TMJ. Materials such as polimethyl methacrylate, polyethylene of high
molecular weight, and a series of metals (Figures 12 and 13) (MEHRA;
WOLFORD, 2001).

Figure 12- Mini-anchor body.


Source - Figure extracted from: MEHRA, P.; WOLFORD, L. M. The Mitek mini anchor for TMJ disc
repositioning: surgical technique and results. J. oral Maxillofac. Surg., v. 30, p. 497–503,
2001.

Figure 13A – Cross-sectional image of condyle showing fixed mini-anchor.


Fig. 13B – Coronal section of condyle showing fixed mini-anchor.
Source - Figure extracted form: WOLFORD, L. M.; DALLAS, A. T. Temporomandibular joint
devices: Treatment factors and Outcomes. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol.
Endod., v. 83, p. 143-9, 1997.
733
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

This procedure is widely used in the constant displacement of articular


disc that leads to inability to perform normal mandible movements, leading to a
better condylar position preventing dislocations, producing a slight lock, limiting non
physiological movement (MEHRA; WOLFORD, 2001).
Numerous metals have been used for that purpose. The basis of
chromium and cobalt are used for reconstruction of the condylar head and high
molecular weight polyethylene to the surface of the glenoid fosse. TMJ models are
initially produced on a computer in three - dimensions, of course adapted to the
structure to be reproduced, and copied according to the peculiar anatomy of each
patient in addition to the essential use of CT scans for the same purpose (VAN
LOON; DE BONT; STEGENGA et al., 2002).
The replacement of the articular disc for alloplastic materials was
popular technique in the 1970s and 1980s. Two materials were shown to be the first
choice as joint implants interpositional discs that were Proplast Teflon (Vitek, Inc.,
Houston, Tex.), And Silastic (Dow-Corning, Midland, Mo.). Later it was observed
that the formation of microscopic particles of these materials in the human body was
unable to degrade and can cause severe foreign body reactions, and lesions of giant-
cell, particle migration, pain, lymphadenopathy, severe osteoarthritis, bone
resorption, perforation of the fosse, and immune dysfunction (WOLFORD;
MEHRA, 2000 and DATAMORE; ATHANASIOU, 2003).
One hundred and seven patients were evaluated with the use of these
types of materials when failed in the use of Teflon was observed. The reconstruction
was performed using autogenous bone grafts, including temporal fascia and muscle
grafts, and also cartilage, dermis, costochondral and sternoclavicular grafts, with a
follow-up of 4 years a success rate around 8% to 31% was observed. The failures
were noticed, especially by the presence of giant cell lesions, pain, foreign body
reaction and ankylosis. Patients who had previous implants were treated with Teflon
denture materials for orthopedic, improved function and occlusal stability with a
significant decrease in pain in 84% of cases (HENRY; WOLFORD, 1993).
Such articular devices have being used successfully for some years.
There are reports of success around 86% with a clinical follow up 16 to 46 months.
In this study the mini-anchors replaced successfully Teflon widely used for several
decades, in 49% of cases. In 14 patients had had one or no symptoms of pain,
instability and occlusal function and 19% had up to two such nuisance.
A clinical study was published in which the use of mini-anchors as a
treatment for TMD was considered as a well established treatment because it leads to
a success rate of about 91% of a total of 43 patients and 78 treated TMJ with clinical
follow-up time of over 2 years (COTTRELL; WOLFORD, 1993).
Sixty-six mini-anchors and their action on changes in vertical and
horizontal cephalometric tracings were studied and it was observed that this device
leads to an excellent joint stability in condylar replacement (CARDENAS;
WOLFORD; GONÇALVES, 1997).

MATERIAL AND METHOD


This study was performed using references on the therapy of
Craniomandibular Disorders, through a Literature Review so this paper aims at
discuss the very important points regarding the Temporomandibular Joint concerning
734
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

- anatomy - normal dynamics of TMJ; physiological aspects - craniomandibular


disorders - treatment of craniomandibular disorders.

DISCUSSION
Through the literature a large number of Craniomandibular Disorders
are verified. According to a study of 12% to 87% of the population carries some
form of disorder, with symptoms ranging from joint pain, headaches, myofascial
pain, decreased ability to jaw movements by vertigo (KIEHN; DESPREZ, 1962;
SILVER; SIMON, 1963; FLYNN; BROWN; LAPP et al., 1990 and LASKIN,
2007).
Treating cases of TMD requires a thorough knowledge of the etiology
of the problem. The multifactorial origin of TMD is characterized as structural,
functional and psychological problems that appear to be fulfilled. Thus it is evident
that the correct diagnosis is the key to successful treatment. It is vital to understand
that patients respond differently to different therapies, and the practitioner must tailor
the treatment to the patient, to obtain the best possible results. Thus it is evident that
the correct diagnosis is the key to successful treatment. It is vital to understand that
patients respond differently to different therapies, and the practitioner must adapt the
treatment to the patient, to obtain the best possible results (FAVERO, 1999 and
STECHMAN NETO, 2001).
Other predisposing factors are cited in literature such as trauma, TMJ
deleterious habits, malocclusion, viral or bacterial infections and systemic or local
diseases. For both the range of treatment options is also large and the main
indications for treatment of recurrent chronic TMD are pain and dysfunction
(MONGINI, 1998 and MEHRA; WOLFORD, 2001).
Therefore, for any treatment to be successful it is imperative to know
the particulars of each treatment, either surgical or nonsurgical (LASKIN;
GREENE; HYLANDER, 2006 and LASKIN, 2007).
There is a consensus in the literature regarding the need for
multidisciplinary treatment (FAVERO, 1999 and OKESON, 2000), being the non-
surgical treatment based in medication, psychological management, intermaxillary
fixation, physical therapy and the application of sclerosing agents in the articular
capsule, ligaments and bilaminar tissue.
In the surgical treatment there are procedures performed in soft tissue,
removal of the structure that is causing some kind of interference, creating an
obstruction to certain translation movements and mandibular osteotomy
(WEINBERG, 1984; ALMEIDA; RODRIGUES; TOLEDO-FILHO et al., 1991
and VASCONCELOS; CAMPELLO; OLIVEIRA et al., 2004).
Regarding surgical treatment, several methods have been described as
eminectomy (MYRHAUG, 1951; IRBY, 1957 and HALE, 1972), scarification of
the tendon of the temporalis muscle by intraoral approach, intending thereby to limit
mandible movements (VASCONCELOS; CAMPELLO OLIVEIRA et al., 2004),
scarification of the articular capsule (VASCONCELOS; CAMPELLO OLIVEIRA
et al., 2004), the oblique osteotomy of the root of the zygomatic bone or Dautrey
procedure (VASCONCELOS; CAMPELLO OLIVEIRA et al., 2004). One can
cite the myotomy of the lateral pterygoid muscle via intraoral (VASCONCELOS;
CAMPELLO OLIVEIRA et al., 2004), the use of miniplates in the articular
eminence (BUCKLEY, TERRY, 1988 and PUELACHER; WALDHART, 1993),
735
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

the articular eminence augmentation by the use of alloplastic graft and the
employment of the use of mini-anchors "Mitek" in the condyle and the posterior root
of zygomatic arch (VASCONCELOS; CAMPELLO OLIVEIRA et al., 2004).
Specifically regarding the use of mini-anchors the nickel-titanium is
used mainly for the purpose of repositioning the disc, which is relevant to note is that
according to the literature this method overlaps in terms of advantages over other
mechanisms with the purposes (WOLFORD; COTTRELL; KARRAS, 1994;
WOLFORD, 1997 and MEHRA; WOLFORD, 2001).
The use of mini-anchors for disc repositioning was reported in more
than 400 TMJ with successful results (WOLFORD, 2007).
A favorable result was also obtained when a minimal change in the
position of mini-anchors in human condyles in long postoperative follow-up was
noted (CARDENAS; WOLFORD; GONÇALVES, 1997).
An interesting feature of the use of mini-anchors was demonstrated
(FIELDS; FRANCO; WOLFORD, 1997): osseointegration. This fact is a unique
aspect, provides a stable anchor position. Also showed that osseointegration occurs
in 3 months despite the application of forces in this period. The same authors also
mention, mini-anchors used in 5 patients with control of 4 years in which there were
no failures demonstrating excellent clinical results. This technique shows how you
can realize the following advantages: 1. Translational control of mandibular
movements. 2. Effectively prevents the displacement of the condyle without altering
the anatomy of the joint (WOLFORD; DALLAS, 1997 and FIELDS; FRANCO;
WOLFORD, 2001).
Just as it has been for osseointegration in dental implants, surgery here
in joints, the force that will be exercised on the TMJ should be minimal. Excessive
force may lead to peri-implantitis and mobility, with the formation of fibrous tissue
at the interface of the implant and bone tissue (ISIDOR, 1996). Low mobility is
perceived when the placement of mini-anchors, however, there is no consensus about
the strength and the vector that can focus on the relationship notwithstanding, more
studies should be made to that effect. Some items should be considered before
placing mini-anchors for the treatment of TMD (MEHRA; WOLFORD, 2001):
1. The implanted devices must be safe, do no injury any joint structure
and not change the anatomical site unless necessary.
2. Access to the temporomandibular joint should be as small as
possible in order to preserve a greater amount of soft tissue.
3. The positioning of the articular disc should be passive in relation to
the condyle.
4. During surgery the periosteum should be preserved and the bone
should be carefully worked and plenty irrigated.
5. Keep at least 2 mm in the bilaminar tissue in the distal portion of
the posterior band of articular disc to be sutured to the mini-anchor.
6. The occlusion should always be checked if necessary an
orthodontic treatment followed by orthognathic surgery can be performed.
As reported one of the great advantages of using this device, is the
predictability of a good positioning in the joint structure, not changing the three
dimensional conformation of the mandibular condyle (WOLFORD; DALLAS,
1997).
Based on this it is clear that the use of mini-anchors for treatment of
Craniomandibular Disorders is a reality, especially in treatment of recurrent
736
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

dislocations of the articular disc in which there is no control in eccentric mandible


movements. It is imperative for this procedure that the surgeon be aware not only of
the surgical technique, but also the complex anatomy of the Temporomandibular
Joint, one of the most complex and elaborate structures of the human body.
Interventions without an adequate preparation would not be prudent. What would be
made of the numerous articles published in the literature if not to help to increase
satisfactory surgical results. The study of techniques and new materials should be
done constantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on literature review, we conclude that:


1. A correct diagnosis is the key to successful treatment for this,
anatomical knowledge of the temporomandibular joint is of paramount importance.
2. The use of mini-anchors as a treatment of TMD was highly
effective and, therefore, is a technique of choice when properly indicated.
3. One of the most important aspects of the use of mini-anchors is the
possibility of osseointegration when used in condyles. Existing mini-anchors which
have this advantage makes the results more predictable and positive

REFERENCES *
AGUIAR, A. P. Introducción al diagnóstico y terapia miofuncional su integración
tratamiento ortopédico maxilofacial. Odont. Postgrado, v. 2, n. 1, p. 3-20, 1988.
ALMEIDA, S. C.; RODRIGUES, C. B. F.; TOLEDO-FILHO, J. L. et al.
Eminectomia articular como tratamento para luxações mandibulares recidivantes.
Rev. Odonto Ciência, v. 1, p. 51-9, 1991.
ANELLI, W.; QUINTO, C. A.; SANTOS, S. R. M. Proposta de Mioterapia nos
casos de DTM: restrição de abertura bucal e desvios na abertura e/ou fechamento
bucal. São Paulo, 1997. [Monografia – Aprimoramento – Irmandade da Santa Casa
de Misericórdia de São Paulo].
ASH, M. M.; RAMFJORD, S. P.; SCHMIDSEDER, J. Oclusão. São Paulo: Ed.
Santos, 1998.
BARROS, J. J.; RODE, S. M. – Tratamento das disfunções crâniomandibulares
ATM. São Paulo: Ed. Santos, 1995. p. 205-7.
BASSANTA, A. D. Estimulação elétrica neural transcutânea. TENS: sua aplicação
nas disfunções temporomandibulares. Rev. Odontol Univ São Paulo, v. 11, n. 2,
p.109-16, abr.,/jun., 1997.
BELL, W. E. Temporomandibular disorders. 3rd ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical
Publishers, 1990.
BIANCHINI, E. M. G. – A Cefalometria nas Alterações Miofuncionais Orais –
Diagnóstico e Tratamento Fonoaudiológico. 4ª ed., São Paulo, Ed. Pró-Fono Dep.,
1998c. 107p.
BROWNE, R. M.; EDMONDSON, H. D.; ROUT, P. G. J. Atlas of dental and
maxillofacial radiology and imaging. London: Ed. Mosby-Wolfe, 1995.
BUCKLEY, M. J.; TERRY, B. C. Use of bone plates to manage chronic mandibular
dislocation: report of cases. J. oral Maxillofac. Surg., v. 46, n. 11, p.998-1002, 1988.
____________________________________________
* According of the ABNT norms.
737
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

CABEZAS, N. T. - Desordens temporomandibulares. Tratado de Fonoaudiología.


São Paulo, Ed. Roca, 1997.
CABEZAS, N. T. Princípios Básicos e Seqüência de Tratamento das Desordens
Temporomandibulares. UNINCOR, 2006.
CARDENAS, L.; WOLFORD, L. M.; GONÇALVES, J. Mitek anchor in TMJ
surgery: positional changes and condylar effects. J. oral Maxillofac. Surg., v. 1997,
n. 55, p. 114, 1997.
COTTRELL, D. A.; WOLFORD, L. M. The Mitek mini anchor in maxillofacial
surgery. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Educat. Summaries and Outlines, v. 57, n. 3, p.
150, 1993.
CZLUSNIAK, G. S.; FERES, M. A. L. - Avaliação radiográfica da posição condílea
em pacientes portadores de más-oclusões classe II divisão 1 e classe divisão 2 de
Angle. Ortodontia, v. 26, n. 2, p. 37-45, 1993.
CARDOSO, A. B.; BELMIRO, C. E.; VASCONCELOS et al., Estudo comparativo
da eminectomia e do uso de miniplaca na eminência articular para tratamento da
luxação recidivante da articulação temporomandibular. Rev. bras. Otorrinolaringol.,
v. 71, n. 1, p. 32-7, jan.,/fev., 2005.
DATAMORE, M. S.; ATHANASIOU, K. A. Structure and function of the
temporomandibular joint disc: implications for tissue engineering. J. Oral
Maxillofac. Surg., v. 61, n. 4, p. 494- 506, 2003.
DAWSON, P. E. Avaliação, diagnóstico e tratamento dos problemas oclusais. Rio
de Janeiro: Ed. Artes Médicas, 2a. ed. 1993.
DONALDSON, D.; KROENING, R. Recognition and treatment of patients with
chronic orofacial pain. J. Am. dent. Assoc., v. 99, p. 961-6, 1979.
DOUGLAS, C. R. - Fisiologia aplicada à prática odontológica. São Paulo: Ed.
Pancast, 1988.
FARELLA, M.; MICHELOTTI, A.; GARGANO, A. et al., Myofascial pain
syndrome misdiagnosed as odontogenic pain: a case report. Crânio, v. 20, p. 307–11,
2000.
FAVERO, K. Disfunções da articulação temporomandibular: Uma visão etiológica
e terapêutica multidisciplinar. Dissertação (Mestrado) - CEFAC: Centro de
Especialização em Fonoaudiología Clínica Motricidade Oral. São Paulo, 1999.
FIELDS, T.; FRANCO, P. F.; WOLFORD, L. M. Osseous-integration of the Mitek
anchor in the human condyle. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., v. 55, n. 92, p.1-8, 1997.
FIGÚN, M. E.; GARINO, R. R. Anatomia odontológica funcional e aplicada. São
Paulo: Ed. Panamericana, 1989.
FLYNN, B.; BROWN, D. T.; LAPP, T. H. et al., A comparative study of
temporomandibular symptoms following mandibular advancement by bilateral
sagittal split osteotomies: rigid versus non-rigid fixation. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med.
Oral. Pathol., v. 70, p. 372–380, 1990.
GARCIA, A. R.; MADEIRA, M. C.; PAIVA, G. et al., Joint vibration analysis in
patients with articular inflamation. Cranio., v. 18, n. 4, p. 272-9, 2008.
GRAY, H. Gray’s anatomy. 35ª ed., Edinburgh: Ed. Longman, 1973.
GRAY, H. Gray’s anatomy. 38ª ed., London: Ed. Churchil Livingstone, 1995.
HALE, R. H. Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the mandible: review of literature
and report of cases. Oral Surg., v. 30, p. 527-30, 1972.
HEFFEZ, L. B.; MAFEE, M. F.; ROSENBERG, H. M. Imaging atlas of the
temporomandibular joint. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Ed. Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
738
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

HENRY, C. H.; WOLFORD, L. M. Treatment outcomes of temporomandibular joint


reconstruction after Proplast-Teflon implant failure. J. oral. Maxillofac. Surg., v. 51,
p. 352-8, 1993.
IRBY, W. B. Surgical correction of chronic dislocation of the temporomandibular
joint not responsive to conservative therapy. J. oral Surg, v. 15, n. 4, p. 307-12,
1957.
ISIDOR, F. Loss of osseointegration caused by oclusal load of oral implants. A
clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin. oral Implants Res., v. 7, p.143,
1996.
JUNQUEIRA, P. S. – A Importância do Trabalho Fonoaudiológico Integrado a
Dentistas e Psicólogos nas Disfunções da Articulação Temporomandibular. São
Paulo, 1990. [ Monografia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo].
KIEHN, C. L.; DESPREZ, J. D. Meniscectomy for internal derangements of the
temporomandibular joint. Br. J. Plast. Surg., v. 15, p. 199–204, 1962.
KURODA, S.; TANIMOTO, K.; IZAWA, T. et al., Biomechanical and biochemical
characteristics of the mandibular condylar cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, v. 4, n.
25, 2009, Article in press.
LASKIN, D. M.; GREENE, C. S.; HYLANDER, W. L. Temporomandibular
disorders: an evidenced-based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Quintessence
Publishers, p. 469–81, 2006.
LASKIN, D. M. Temporomandibular disorders: the past, present, and future.
Odontology, v. 95, p. 10–15, 2007.
MACIEL, R. N.; TURELL, J. C. F. Anatomía da ATM. In: MACIEL, R. N.;
WESTESSON, P. L.; TURELL, J. C. F. et al., ATM e dores craniofaciais –
Fisiopatologia básica. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Ed. Santos, 2003, p. 63-90.
MACIEL, R. N.; WESTESSON, P. L.; TURELL, J. C. F. et al., ATM e dores
craniofaciais–Fisiopatologia básica. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Ed. Santos, 2003, p. 63-90.
MACIEL, R. N. - Oclusão e ATM: procedimentos clínicos. São Paulo, Santos, 1996.
MANNS, A.; DÍAZ, G. Sistema Estomatognático. Santiago: Ed. Empigraf, 1983.
MEHRA, P.; WOLFORD, L. M. The Mitek mini anchor for TMJ disc repositioning:
surgical technique and results. J. oral Maxillofac. Surg., v. 30, p. 497–503, 2001.
MIRHAUG, H. A new method of operation for habitual dislocation of the mandible
– review of former methods of treatment. Acta Odontol. Scand., v. 9, p.247-61, 1951.
MOLINA, O. F. - Fisiopatologia crâniomandibular: oclusão e ATM. São Paulo:
Pancast, 1995.
MONGINI, F. ATM e músculos craniocervicofaciais: fisiopatologia e tratamento.
São Paulo: Santos, 1998.
MORAIS, L. E.; OLIVEIRA, M. G.; OLIVEIRA, H. W. Análise da articulação
temporomandibular de pacientes adultos com artrite reumatóide por tomografia
computadorizada de alta resolução. J. Passo Fundo, v. 1, n. 6, p. 59-66, 2001.
MURAYAMA, R. A.; STUGINSKI-BARBOSA, J.; MORAES, N. P. et al.
Toothache referred from auriculotemporal neuralgia: case report. Int. Endod. J., n.
1599, p. 1-7; 2009.
NAIDOO, L.C.; JUNIPER R. P. Morphometric analysis of the insertion of the upper
head of the lateral pterygoid muscle. Oral Surg., v. 83, p. 441-6, 1997.
NORMAN, J. E.; BRAMLEY, P. A textbook and colour atlas of the
temporomandibular joint. England: Wolf Medical Publications, 1990.
OKESON, J. P. - Nonsurgical management of disc interference disorders. Dent. Clin.
N. Amer., v. 35, p. 29-51, 1991.
739
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

OKESON, J. P. – Current Diagnostic Classification Schema and Assessment of


Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., v.
83, n. 1, p. 61-4,1997.
OKESON, J. P. Dores bucofaciais de Bell. 5 a ed. São Paulo: Quintessence, 1998.
OKESON, J. P. Tratamiento de la oclusión y las afecciones temporomandibulares.
4th ed. Madrid: Harcourt, 1999.
OKESON, J. P. Tratamento das desordens temporomandibulares e oclusão. 4ª ed.
São Paulo: Ed. Artes Médicas, 2000.
OKESON, J. P. Tratamiento de Oclusión y Afecciones Temporomandibulares. 5ª Ed.
Elsevier, 2003.
OKESON, J. P. Fundamentos da oclusão e desordens temporomandibulares. 2ª ed.
São Paulo: Ed. Artes Medicas, 449p.
OKESON, J. P. Current terminology and diagnostic classification schemes. Oral.
Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pat. Oral Radiol. Endod., v.83, n.1, p.61-4, 1997.
OLIVEIRA, M. G. Manual de anatomia da cabeça e do pescoço para estudantes de
odontologia. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs, 2a ed., 1994.
PAIVA, H. J.; VIEIRA, A. M. F.; COSTA, H. C. C. et al. Disfunções do sistema
mastigatório e da articulação temporomandibular: uma cartilha para o paciente. Rev.
Period., v. 2, n. 3, p. 65-72, 1993.
PORTERO, P. P.; KERN, R.; KUSMA, S. Z. et al., Placas oclusais no tratamento da
disfunção temporomandibular (DTM). Rev. Gestão Saúde, v. 1, n. 1, p. 36-40. 2009.
PUELACHER, W. C.; WALDHART, E. Miniplate eminoplasty: a new surgical
treatment for TMJ dislocation. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., v. 21, p. 176-8, 1993.
RAMJORD, S. I.; ASH, M. Oclusão. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Interamericana, 1984.
RINTALA, M.; METSARANTA, M.; SAAMANEN, A. M. et al., Abnormal
craniofacial growth and early mandibular osteoarthritis in mice harbouring a mutant
type II collagen transgene. J. Anat., v. 190, n. 2, p. 201–8, 1997.
RHODEN, R. M.; NICOLINI, I.; SORDI, N. N. et al., Disfunção muscular da
articulação temporo - mandibular. Rev. Médica HSVP, v. 3, n. 8, p. 15-18, 1992.
SPALTEHOLZ, W. Atlas de anatomia humana. 16ª ed., São Paulo: Ed. Livraria
Roca, 1988.
SARNAT, B.; LASKIN, D. The temporomandibular joint: A biological basis for
clinical pratice. 4ª ed. Philadelphia: Ed. W. B. Saunders Co., 1992.
SICHER, H.; DU BRUL, E. L. Anatomia oral. 8 a ed. São Paulo: Ed. Artes Médicas,
1991.
SILVER, C. M.; SIMON, S. D. Meniscus injuries of the temporomandibular joint:
further experiences. J. Bone Joint Surg., v. 45, p. 113–24, 1963.
SOBOTTA, J. Atlas de anatomia humana. 18ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed.Guanabara
Koogan, 1990.
SOLBERG, W. K. Disfunções e desordens temporomandibulares. 2 ª. Ed. São Paulo:
Ed. Santos, 1989.
SOVIEIRO, V. M.; ABREU, F. V.; CASTRO, L. A. et al., Disfunção da articulação
têmporo-mandibular em crianças: revisão de literatura. J. brasil. Ortod. Ortop. Maxi,
v. 2, n. 9, p. 49-52, 1997.
STEGENGA, B.; SCHOUTEN, H. Mandibular pain and movement disorders,
focusing on the temporomandibular joint. Ned. Tijdschr. Tandheelkd., v. 114, n. 1, p.
41-6, 2007.
STECHMAN NETO, J. Protocolo para diagnóstico e tratamento das disfunções
temporomandibulares (DTM). JBO, v.6, n.34, p.317- 24, 2001.
740
CRANIOMANDIBULAR DISORDERS – ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY –
TREATMENT MODALITIES – LITERATURE REVIEW

SZUMINSKI, S. M. A Fonoaudióloga e as Disfunções da Articulação


temporomandibular. Dissertação (Mestrado) - CEFAC: Centro de Especialização em
Fonoaudiologia Clínica Motricidade Oral. São Paulo, 1999.
TAKAHASHI, F. E.; ARAÚJO, M. A. M. - Distúrbios funcionais da oclusão e sua
correlação com radiografias transcranianas da articulação temporomandibular em
pacientes portadores de fissuras labiopalatais. Rev. Odontol. UNESP, v. 24, n. 1, p.
137-51, 1995.
VALMASEDA, E.; GAY ESCODA, C. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la patología de
la articulación temporomandibular. ORL-DIPS, v. 29, n. 2, p. 55-70, 2002.
VAN LOON, J. P.; DE BONT, L. G.; STEHGENGA, B. et al., Groningen
temporomandibular joint prosthesis. Development and first clinical application. Int.
J. oral Maxillofac. Surg., v. 31, n. 1, p. 44-52, feb., 2002.
VASCONCELOS, B. C. E.; CAMPELLO, R. I. C.; OLIVEIRA, D. M. et al.
Luxação da articulação temporomandibular – Revisão da literatura. Rev. Cirurg.
Traumat. BMF. v. 4, n. 4, p. 218-22, out.,/dez., 2004.
WADHWA, S.; KAPILA, S. TMJ Disorders: Future Innovations in Diagnostics and
Therapeutics. J. dent. Educ., v.72, n.8, p.930–947, 2008.
WEINBERG, S. Eminectomy and meniscorhaphy for internal derangements of the
temporomandibular joint. J. oral Surg., v. 57, n. 3, p. 241-9, 1984.
WOLFE, F.; SMYTHE, H. A.; YUNUS, M. B. et al., The American College of
Rheumatology 1990 criteria of the classification of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum., v.
33, p. 160-72, 1990.
WOLFORD, L. M.; DALLAS, A. T. Temporomandibular joint devices: Treatment
factors and Outcomes. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., v.83,
p.143-9, 1997.
WOLFORD, L. M.; KARRAS, S. C. Simultaneous TMJ and orthognathic surgery. J.
Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., v. 52, n. 98, p. 1-8, 1994.
WOLFORD, L. M.; PITTA, M. C.; MEHRA, P. Mitek anchors for treatment of
chronic mandibular dislocation. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral pathol. Oral Radiol.
Endod., v. 92, p. 495–8, 2001.
WOLFORD, L. M.; P. MEHRA. Custom-made total joint prosthesis for
temporomandibular joint reconstruction. Proc. Baylor Univ. Med.Cent., v. 13, p.
135–8, 2000.
WOLFORD, L. M. Clinical indications for simultaneous TMJ and orthognathic
surgery. Cranio, v. 25, n. 4, p. 273-82, oct., 2007.

o0o

You might also like